Management of Injuries to the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament: A Review

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Case Report for an Integrated Rehabilitation Approach

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is a surgical treatment, primarily indicated for patients grappling with recurrent patellar instability stemming from traumatic injury or underlying anatomical anomalies. This abstract aims to elucidate the indispensable role of physiotherapy in the post-operative rehabilitation trajectory for individuals subjected to MPFL reconstruction. Physiotherapy emerges as a linchpin in securing a triumphant outcome, fostering the healing of patellar stability, augmentation of range of motion (ROM), and bolstering muscular strength while concurrently mitigating potential complications. The abstract accentuates salient facets of a physiotherapeutic regimen, encompassing prompt post-operative mobilization, meticulously tailored exercise paradigms, adept utilization of manual therapy modalities, and comprehensive patient education. Notably, this collaborative endeavor between orthopedic surgeons and physiotherapists is pivotal in optimizing patient convalescence, restoring them to their pre-injury functional acumen. A paramount emphasis is placed on individualized rehabilitation strategies, gradual and systematic exercise protocols, and patient adherence, thereby underscoring how the harmonious synergy between surgical and physiotherapeutic interventions augments the prospects of achieving a successful MPFL reconstruction outcome.

Comparison of patellar anchor fixation graft and graft through patellar tunnel reconstruction of medial patellofemoral ligament in the treatment of recurrent patellar dislocation: A protocol for a meta-analysis of comparative studies

BACKGROUND

Recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD) occurs in people who have their own patellofemoral dysplasia and who have not been properly treated after their first patellar dislocation. For RPD where conservative treatment is ineffective, medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is the first choice for surgical treatment, but there are various and controversial ways of MPFL reconstruction and fixation. Initially, more scholars adopted the patellar lateral tunneling (PT) approach to contain and stabilize the graft, but with the newer materials and techniques, some experts adopted the lateral patellar anchor fixation (AF) of the graft, which can avoid the collateral damage caused by the patellar lateral tunneling and can obtain the same definite efficacy. Therefore, a meta-analysis must be performed to provide evidence whether there is a difference between AF and PT reconstruction of the MPFL in the treatment of RPD.

METHODS

We will search, with no time restriction, without any restriction of language and status, the time from the establishment of the database to October 2022, on the following databases: PubMed (MEDLINE), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data (WF), Chinese Scientific Journals Database (VIP), and Chinese databases SinoMed (CBM) electronic databases. The electronic database search will be supplemented by a manual search of the reference lists of included articles. We will apply the risk-of-bias tool of the Cochrane Collaboration for randomized controlled trials to assess the methodological quality. Risk-of-Bias Assessment Tool for Non-randomized Studies was used to evaluate the quality of comparative studies. Statistical analysis will be conducted using RevMan 5.4 software.

RESULTS

This systematic review and meta-analysis will evaluate the functional outcomes of the two fixation modalities, AF and PT, in reconstructing MPFL for RPD.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study will provide a basis for clinical judgment of whether there is a difference between the two forms of AF and PT reconstructed MPFL for RPD.

Femoral tunnel malposition is the most common indication for revision medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with promising early outcomes following revision reconstruction: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to identify the causes of failure of previous medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL-R), and to furthermore report the surgical techniques available for MPFL revision surgery.

METHODS

Four databases [PubMed, Ovid (MEDLINE), Cochrane Database, and EMBASE] were searched until September 29, 2020 for human studies pertaining to revision MPFL. Two reviewers screened the literature independently and in duplicate. Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria, or the CAse REport guidelines (CARE), where appropriate.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies (one level II, one level III, two level IV, ten level V) were identified. This search resulted in a total of 76 patients with a mean age (range) of 22 (14-39) years. The patients were 75% female with a mean (range) time to revision of 24.1 (1-60) months and mean (range) follow-up of 36.2 (2-48) months. The most common indication for revision surgery was malpositioning of the femoral tunnel (38.1%), unaddressed trochlear dysplasia (18.4%), patellar fracture (11.8%). Femoral tunnel malposition was typically treated via revision MPFL-R with quadriceps tendon or semitendinosus autograft and may retain the primary graft if fixation points were altered. Unaddressed trochlear dysplasia was treated with deepening trochleoplasty with or without revision MPFL-R, and patella fracture according to the nature of the fracture pattern and bone quality. Though generally, outcomes in the revision scenario across all indications were inferior to those post-primary procedure, overall, revision patients demonstrated positive improvements in pain and instability symptoms. Transverse patella fractures treated with debridement and filling with demineralized bone matrix if required with further fixation according to the fracture pattern.

CONCLUSION

The most common causes of MPFL failure in literature published to date, in order of decreasing frequency, are: malposition of the femoral tunnel, unaddressed trochlear dysplasia, and patellar fracture. Although surgical techniques of revision MPFL-R to manage these failures were varied, promising outcomes have been reported to date. Larger prospective comparative studies would be useful to clarify optimal surgical management of MPFL-R failure at long-term follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

CLINICAL RESULTS OF MEDIAL PATELLOFEMORAL LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION

Objective

To assess clinical results of patients who underwent medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction after a minimum of two years of follow-up.

Methods

Patients' medical records were assessed for residual instability, patient satisfaction, and post-operative functional outcomes.

Results

Fifty-one patients were analyzed, out of which 56.87% were women. Patients' mean age was 30.8 years (16 to 57 years). The mean follow-up time was 68.7 months (37 to 120 months). Length between first dislocation and surgery was less than 1 year for 58.82% of patients, between 1 and 5 years for 37.25%, and over 5 years for 3.93%. Patients showed a high degree of satisfaction (96.08% would undergo surgery again), with recurrence rate of 11.76%. Twenty-two patients reported knee symptoms, including pain from movements (72.72%), weakness (18.18%), constant pain (13.63%), and crepitus (4.54%). Considering dissatisfied patients, patients with dislocation recurrence, and patients with symptoms, five cannot practice physical activity, out of which only three blame their knee.

Conclusion

MPFL reconstruction showed a recurrence rate of 11.7%, with high patient satisfaction, good functional results, and high rate of return to sports, after a minimum of two years of follow-up. Level of Evidence IV, Case Series.

Biomechanical Comparison of 2 Patellar Fixation Techniques in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: Transosseous Sutures vs Suture Anchors

Background

Multiple techniques for fixing a graft to the patella in medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction have been described; however, no single technique has been shown to be superior to another.

Purpose/Hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical performance of 2 different patellar fixation techniques: suture anchor (SA) and transosseous suture (TS) fixation. The hypothesis was that there would be no significant differences between the groups in ultimate failure load, stiffness, or elongation.

Study Design

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods

In this study, a new TS technique was biomechanically compared with the SA technique for MPFL reconstruction using 24 fresh-frozen mature porcine patellae and porcine flexor profundus tendons. The specimens were randomized into 2 groups undergoing MPFL reconstruction using either the SA technique or the TS technique (n = 12 per group). Fixation with TS was completed using 3 No. 2 UltraBraid sutures and three 2-mm transosseous tunnels. SA reconstruction was completed using 2 parallel 3.5-mm titanium SAs with 2 No. 2 UltraBraid sutures. We preconditioned each graft using a force between 5 and 20 N before cyclic loading. Then, the specimens were biomechanically tested (1000 cycles; 5-100 N; 1 Hz) and loaded under tension at 200 mm/min until failure. The ultimate failure load, stiffness, elongation, and failure mode were recorded for each specimen. The Shapiro-Wilk test and independent t tests were used to assess the data.

Results

The TS technique resulted in a significantly higher mean failure load than did the SA technique (496.18 ± 93.15 vs 399.43 ± 105.35 N; P = .03). The TS technique resulted in less stiffness than did the SA technique (55.42 ± 7.92 vs 72.11 ± 10.64 N/mm; P < .01). There was no significant difference between the groups in elongation. None of the graft fixation/patellar complexes failed during cyclic testing in either group. During the load-to-failure test, the most common mode of failure in the SA group was an anchor being pulled out of the bone, whereas that in the TS group was rupture of the suture material.

Conclusion

MPFL reconstruction with 3 TSs provided a higher load to failure than did the commonly used fixation method involving SAs.

Anatomic and Biomechanical Properties of Flat Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Using an Adductor Magnus Tendon Graft: A Human Cadaveric Study

BACKGROUND

In contrast to the majority of existing techniques for reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL), the technique described in this article uses the adductor magnus muscle tendon to gain a flat, broad graft, leaving its distal femoral insertion intact, and does not require drilling within or near the femoral physis. It also allows for soft tissue patellar fixation and could facilitate anatomic MPFL reconstruction in skeletally immature patients.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the anatomic and structural properties of the native MPFL and the adductor tendon (AT), followed by biomechanical evaluation of the proposed reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

The morphological and topographical features of the AT and MPFL were evaluated in 12 fresh-frozen cadaveric knees. The distance between the distal insertion of the AT on the adductor tubercle and the adductor hiatus, as well as the desired length of the graft, was measured to evaluate this graft's application potential. Load-to-failure tests were performed to determine the biomechanical properties of the proposed reconstruction construct. The construct was placed in a uniaxial testing machine and cyclically loaded 500 times between 5 and 50 N, followed by load to failure, to measure the maximum elongation, stiffness, and maximum load.

RESULTS

The mean ± SD length of the AT was 12.6 ± 1.5 cm, and the mean distance between the insertion on the adductor tubercle and adductor hiatus was 10.8 ± 1.3 cm, exceeding the mean desired length of the graft (7.5 ± 0.5 cm) by 3.3 ± 0.7 cm. The distal insertion of the AT was slightly proximal and posterior to the insertion of the MPFL. The maximum elongation after cyclical loading was 1.9 ± 0.4 mm. Ultimately, the mean stiffness and load to failure were 26.2 ± 7.6 N/mm and 169.7 ± 19.2 N, respectively. The AT graft failed at patellar fixation in 2 of the initially tested specimens and at the femoral insertion in the remaining 10.

CONCLUSION

The described reconstruction using the AT has potential for MPFL reconstruction. The AT graft presents a graft of significant volume, beneficial anatomic topography, and adequate tensile properties in comparison with the native MPFL following the data from previously published studies.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Given its advantageous anatomic relationship as an application that avoids femoral drilling and osseous patellar fixation, the AT may be considered a graft for MPFL reconstruction in skeletally immature patients.

Does surgical treatment produce better outcomes than conservative treatment for acute primary patellar dislocations? A meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials

Purpose

The objective of this study was to conduct the latest meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compare clinical results between surgery and conservative therapy of acute primary patellar dislocation (APPD), focusing on medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction.

Methods

We performed a literature search in Embase, The Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Medline to identify RCTs comparing APPD surgical treatment with conservative treatment from the establishment of each database to January 2019. The methodological quality of each RCT was assessed independently by the two authors through the Cochrane Collaboration’s “Risk of Bias” tool. Mean differences of continuous variables and risk ratios of dichotomous variables were computed for the pooled data analyses. The I² statistic and the χ² test were used to evaluate heterogeneity, with the significance level set at I² > 50% or P < 0.10.

Results

Ten RCTs with a sum of 569 patients (297 receiving surgical treatment and 263 receiving conservative treatment) met the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. Pooled data analysis showed no statistical difference in the field of subluxation rate, Kujala score, patient satisfaction, and frequency of reoperation between the two groups. Tegner activity score and recurrent dislocation rate in the conservative group were significantly higher than those in the surgically treated group.

Conclusions

Conservative treatment may produce better outcomes than surgery for APPD in consideration of Tegner activity score. However, in view of limited research available, the interpretation of the discoveries should be cautious. More convincing evidence is required to confirm the effect of MPFL reconstruction.

Isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction significantly improved quality of life in patients with recurrent patella dislocation

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to measure the improvement in quality of life (QoL) following isolated anatomical double-bundle medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.

METHODS

This is a single-centre, prospective study of 56 consecutive patients (57 knees) who underwent isolated MPFL reconstruction between 2014 and 2017. Functional outcome and QoL were assessed with the Kujala score and the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire, respectively. Objective outcomes were obtained through clinical examination at the latest follow-up assessing redislocation rate, patella apprehension test, patellar tilt, pain and range of motion.

RESULTS

The median Kujala score increased from 60 (range 31-96) to 92 (range 34-100) at latest follow-up (p < 0.001). The median EQ-5D index also increased, from 0.69 (range 0.10-1) at baseline to 1 (range 0.16-1) at latest follow-up (p < 0.001), as well as the median EQ-5D VAS from 75 (range 20-95) to 92 (range 40-100) (p < 0.001). Four dimensions of the EQ-5D were significantly improved except for the anxiety/depression scores. Female patients reported lower scores at baseline and at latest follow-up, for all three outcomes (Kujala, EQ-5D index, EQ-5D VAS), however there was no evidence that gender negatively impacted on the benefit of surgery. The re-dislocation rate was 0%. Apprehension and patellar tilt test were negative in all patients and no flexion deficit was identified at latest follow-up. Two patients had tenderness along the reconstruction requiring femoral screw removal in one of them.

CONCLUSIONS

Isolated anatomical double-bundle aperture MPFL reconstruction, offered significantly improved short-term QoL along with excellent functional outcome. Female patients scored lower, but this did not affect the overall outcome. Including QoL tools in the assessment of ligament reconstruction operations, such as the MPFL, can provide more accurate understanding of the overall patient benefit.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

A new classification of injury patterns of the medial patellofemoral ligament after acute lateral patella dislocation detected using magnetic resonance imaging studies

INTRODUCTION

Acute lateral patellar dislocation is a very common condition in orthopedics, especially among adolescents and physically active patients. To evaluate distinct medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) injury patterns and the associated knee pathology after acute lateral patellar dislocation (ALPD) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies, which is essential for the development of treatment protocols.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MRI images of 74 ALPD patients were taken between January 2015 to December 2016. Images were evaluated using standardized protocols.

RESULTS

The prevalence of MPFL injury following ALPD was 97.3% (72/74 patients). Among the 72 patients with MPFL, the prevalence of Type Ⅰ injury was 26.4% (19/72). Since only bone marrow edema and a partial tear were showed on MRI of these patients, conservative treatment was given. Tear of the MPFL occurred at the patellar attachment (Type Ⅱa) in 16 patients (16/72, 22.2%), at the middle area of the ligament (Type Ⅱb) in 5 patients (5/72, 6.9%), and at the femoral attachment (Type Ⅱc) in 27 patients (27/72, 37.5%). For Type Ⅱ injuries, all patients had the surgery to reconstruct the MPFL. The prevalence of Type Ⅲ MPFL injury was 6.9% (5/72) after the surgery.

CONCLUSION

MPFL injury of is a common sequel following ALPD. We assessed the distinct injury pattern and associated pathology of MPFL using MRI studies. A good understanding of the injury pattern and associated knee pathology of MPFL is essential in managing patients with ALPD, especially if surgical intervention is considered.