99mTc-markierte Anti-CEA-Antikörper in der intraoperativen Diagnostik kolorektaler Karzinome

Experimental radioimmunoguided surgery for peritoneal metastases of gastric cancer using anticarcinoembryonic antigen-specific T84.66 F(ab')2

PURPOSE

In gastric cancer, peritoneal dissemination is the most frequent cause of the noncurative resection and recurrence after curative resection. We therefore evaluated the feasibility of radioimmunoguided surgery (RIGS) in the treatment of peritoneal metastases of gastric cancer and the use of anti-CEA-specific T84.66 F(ab')2 as an efficient immune agent.

METHODS

Two human gastric cancer cell lines, MKN45 and RF48, were intraperitoneally xenografted into nude mice, which were later injected with 125I-labeled T84.66 F(ab')2. Peritoneal tumors were localized by RIGS 5 days after antibody injection. The minimum number of cells detected by a gamma probe was assayed by in vitro tumor cell localization.

RESULTS

We observed 37 peritoneal metastases: 8 invisible (long diameter, <1 mm), 6 small (1- < 5 mm), and 23 large (> or =5 mm) tumors. The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of RIGS in detecting peritoneal metastasis were 82% (69/84), 76% (28/37), and 87% (41/47), respectively. RIGS accuracy did not differ with respect to tumor diameter. Mean labeling indices over minimal and maximal normal counts were 6.1+/-1.2 (mean +/- SEM) and 4.7+/-1, respectively. Mean scores of CEA immunostaining and silver grains in tumors were significantly higher than those in the nontumor-bearing peritoneum (P < 0.001). There was a close correlation among radioactivity, immunostaining and microautoradiography (P < 0.001-0.005). We observed six false-positive and nine false-negatives which may have been due to high blood background and negative radioimmune reactivity, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

125I-labeled T84.66 F(ab')2 efficiently targeted peritoneally disseminated gastric cancer cells, suggesting that RIGS using this immune agent may accurately detect occult peritoneal metastases in patients with gastric cancer.

Positron emission tomography (PET) and other nuclear medicine modalities in staging gastrointestinal cancer

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers account for the second highest number of new tumor cases and deaths per year in the United States and Western Europe. The most frequently involved sites are, in descending order, the colorectum, stomach, pancreas, liver, bile duct, and esophagus. The most common tumor type is adenocarcinoma. Among the epithelial cancers, great attention has recently been given to the tumors of neuroendocrine origin. These concepts are relevant because nuclear medicine imaging is based on visualization by means of a particular uptake of radiolabelled tracers in cancer cells that concentrate the radioactive signal. This signal is detected and reconstructed in planar or tomographic images. Different radiopharmaceuticals have been proposed for diagnostic application in oncology (such as radiolabelled monoclonal antibodies (MAbs), receptor tracers, and positron-emitting radiopharmaceuticals), and they are currently used as tracers for tumor detection with different modalities and techniques. Most of these techniques demonstrate their clinical usefulness in the diagnosis of GI cancer. This work is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all the extensive experience and possibilities of nuclear medicine for the diagnosis of GI tumors; rather, it aims to summarize the current status of the most important approaches and their main indications in staging GI cancers.

[Clinical value of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy. Studies of pre- and intraoperative localization of gastrointestinal and pancreatic tumors]

BACKGROUND

[111In-DTPA-D-Phe1]-pentetreotide scintigraphy is able to detect neuroendocrine tumors not shown by radiological methods.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In 270 patients with neuroendocrine gastroenteropancreatic tumors (GEP tumors) 400 somatostatin receptor scintigraphies were performed. 70 patients (38 female, 32 male, aged 28 to 74 [56 +/- 12.6] years) underwent surgery and follow-up over 2 years. The aim of the present study was the comparison of preoperative somatostatin receptor scintigraphy with radiological methods (sonography, CT) and intraoperative localization of GEP tumors with a hand-held gamma-probe.

RESULTS

Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy was successful in localizing primary tumors in all patients. Liver- and lymph node metastases could be visualized with a sensitivity of 94 and 95 percent. In 7 patients 35 lesions could be identified by intraoperative tumor localization using a hand held gamma probe. Radiological methods identified only 11, surgical palpation 15 and preoperative somatostatin receptor scintigraphy 27 lesions.

CONCLUSION

Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy improves detection of small and occult GEP tumors. Intraoperative probe counting with a hand-held gamma probe can identify tumors even when they are small and impalpable, but receptor positive.