Risk of Hepatitis A in Dutch Hemophilia Patients

Vaccination Against Hepatitis A for Hemophilic Patients: Is It Necessary?

BACKGROUND

Hemophilic patients require long-life intravenous infusion of factor concentrates to treat bleedings. This could increase the risk of transmission of blood-borne infections like hepatitis C.

OBJECTIVES

The current study was aimed at investigating the immunity status against hepatitis A in hemophilic patients in south Khorasan and evaluating the necessity of hepatitis A vaccination for this population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted between 2014 and 2015 on all hemophilic patients of south Khorasan province, Iran (n = 108) for anti-HAV total, anti- HCV, HBs-Ag, anti-HIV, and anti-HTLV-I /II. Note that no one had already received a hepatitis A vaccine.

RESULTS

As our results show, 77.8% of the participants (59% under 20 and 88.4% above 20 years old) were seropositive for anti-HAV total; 20.4% and 2.8% (three patients) of the cases were anti-HCV positive and anti-HTLV-1 positive, respectively, while none of the subjects were HBS-Ag or HIV-Ab positive. Seventeen of the patients (15.75%) showed a co-infection of HAV with HCV, and five HCV-infected patients (22.73%) had no immunity against hepatitis A. There was a significant relationship between age, rural life, and anti-HAV positive state in our patients (P < 0.001). No significant relationship between positive anti-HAV status and sex (P = 0.16), severity of hemophilia (P = 0.23), and infection with HIV, HCV, HTLV-1, and hepatitis B (P > 0.05) was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

More than 40% of the hemophilic patients under 20 years of age in the present study had no immunity against hepatitis A, and 23% of hepatitis C patients had not had a hepatitis A co-infection yet. Since hepatitis A can show a fulminant course in hepatitis C patients, vaccination against hepatitis A seems necessary in hemophilic patients in the region.

Implementation of a hepatitis A prevention policy in haemophiliacs: results from the French cohort

In the early nineties, the occurrence of hepatitis A outbreaks in some patients with haemophilia in some countries led French health authorities to recommend hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccination in HAV-seronegative haemophiliacs. The French 'Suivi thérapeutique National des Hémophiles' cohort permitted to assess the implementation of this recommendation by the analysis of the vaccinal process, i.e. HAV seropositivity assessment and vaccination of HAV-seronegative patients, in a survival approach. In a subgroup of 812 patients diagnosed earlier than 1990 (prevalent cohort), the implementation of vaccinal process increased quickly from 0% in 1993 to 41.8% in 1994 and to 71.2% in 1996, suggesting a 'notification effect'. The vaccinal process was associated to three cofactors in a Cox model analysis (age, severity of haemophilia, centre of treatment). No infection was observed during the survey in this group. In another subgroup of 201 boys born since 1993 (incident cohort), 27.5% and 15.4% patients remained exposed to the risk at 3 and 5 years from diagnosis respectively, again with a 'centre effect', which might be linked to various factors such as regain in confidence for products or economic reasons. Only five infectious seroconversions were assessed over the 7-year survey, which represents 14.5 cases per 1000 person-year incidence without any relationship with products. Our data combined with the contemporary hepatitis A epidemiology and the current safety of anti-haemophilic concentrates, should lead to a new assessment of the risk of hepatitis A in haemophiliacs. We suggest that among patients with bleeding disorder, as well as in other populations, HAV prevention policy might be stressed on those who already suffer from chronic liver disease and/or travel in endemic countries.

Prévalence et facteurs de risque de l'hépatite A au sein d'une population de patients infectés par le virus de l'immunodéficience humaine

BACKGROUND

There are common risk factors between hepatitis A virus (HAV) and human immuno deficiency virus (HIV) infections.

OBJECTIVES

We tried to evaluate if HIV-infected patients could be at risk for HAV. More over, HAV could worsen prognosis of HIV infection and HAV vaccination was then to be considered. Thus we assessed the prevalence and risk factors of HAV infection in an HIV-infected population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seroprevalence and risk factors for HAV were studied among 154 HIV-positive patients followed in a Parisian hospital (mean age: 42 years, male patients: 70.8%, female patients: 29.2%). They were screened for HAV antibodies and answered a questionnaire on risk factors for HAV and means of HIV contamination.

RESULTS

The global prevalence was 72.7% [IC95%: 65.7-79.7]. We excluded patients who were born in highly endemic areas where seroprevalence reached 60% [IC95%: 51.2-70]. The HAV seroprevalence was almost 100% in migrants from highly endemic countries and for those born before 1946. The multivariate analysis showed that risk factors were the geographic origin [OR=20.88; IC95%: 2.40-181], age [OR = 2.33; IC95%: 1.24-4.39], and hemophilia [OR = 13.78; IC95%: 1.34-141].

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that a screening test for HAV antibodies should be performed before vaccination, especially in HIV-infected patients born after 1946 or in non-endemic countries.

Risk groups for hepatitis A virus infection

We report the conduct and results of a systematic search for evidence of risk of infection with hepatitis A virus (HAV) among blood transfusion recipients, travellers, the military, healthcare workers, sewage workers, foodhandlers, day care assistants, institutionalised subjects, blood transfusion recipients, drug addicts, homosexuals, prisoners and other risk groups such a liver transplantees. We report our recommendations for the use of the HAV vaccine in these groups.

Viral safety of blood derivatives by immune neutralization

Despite careful donor selection and virus inactivation procedures, transmission of viruses by transfusion of blood and blood derivatives is still a threat. Outbreaks of hepatitis A among hemophiliacs having received highly purified, immune globulin depleted coagulation factor concentrates, put the importance of immune neutralization of viruses in blood derivatives in focus. Neutralizing antibodies may block several steps in the virus infection of a cell, from binding of virus to the cellular receptor to the uncoating of virus after uptake in the cell. The efficacy of antibody neutralizing activity depends on the availability and stability of the neutralizing epitopes. Hepatitis A and B viruses are very efficiently neutralized by antibodies and immune escape mutants rarely emerge. Anti-parvovirus B19 antibodies do not fully inactivate the virus, at least in low concentrations, but may prevent development of disease. The neutralizing epitopes on hepatitis C virus and human immunodeficiency virus are located on hypervariable regions of virus membrane proteins. The effects of neutralizing antibodies are thus marginal as immune escape mutants emerge at a relatively high frequency for both viruses. The neutralizing activity of anti-cytomegalovirus antibodies is also questionable as persons may become reinfected with cytomegolvirus despite high levels of antibodies. Plasma and plasma derivatives produced from large donor pools have the potential of being very efficient transmitters of viruses. Neutralizing antibodies are Nature's own, and very important barriers against the spread of many known and unknown viruses contaminating the plasma pools.