Distal Radioulnar Joint Replacement in the Scarred Wrist

Performance of the Aptis distal radioulnar joint implant: kinematic and geometric analysis

This study reviews the performance of the Aptis distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty by comparing multiple kinematic and geometric measurements in the operated and contralateral healthy forearm to elucidate whether these are altered after arthroplasty. Forearm geometry and motion were captured using 3-D and 4-D computed tomography in 12 patients with unilateral Aptis arthroplasties. After segmentation and registration, the axis of forearm rotation, translation of the radius along the ulna and range of wrist flexion-extension were measured, and the Dice coefficient and Hausdorff distance were calculated. The forearm rotation axis in the corrected arm deviated 2.3° from the healthy contralateral rotation axis, radial translation along the ulna decreased by 45% and wrist flexion-extension also decreased significantly. Multiple intra-individual geometric differences were observed. The Aptis distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty considerably alters forearm kinematics, which can have clinical implications.Level of evidence: IV.

Aptis Distal Radioulnar Joint Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Evaluation of Functional Outcomes, Complications, and Patient Satisfaction

Background  The Aptis distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) implant has been commonly used to replace the DRUJ and restore wrist function in patients with a severely destroyed DRUJ. Objective  Promising results have been described in the literature. However, the clinical results in a multicenter setting are sparse and variable. This study evaluates the short- to midterm clinical results of 53 patients with a (mean) follow-up of 51 months. Patients and Methods  Fifty-three patients (59 implants) treated between 2011 and 2020 in three different institutions were retrospectively identified in a prospectively collected database. The main indication for Aptis DRUJ arthroplasty was a destroyed DRUJ and gross distal radioulnar instability and isolated DRUJ osteoarthritis. Functional outcome, complications, and patient satisfaction were evaluated. Patients completed the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) questionnaire and an additional questionnaire about patient satisfaction and return to hobby/work. Results  Implant survival was 92%, the surgical follow-up showed many complications (64,4%), and revision surgery was needed frequently (40.7%). In 13 cases, the follow-up was longer than 5 years. Three reimplantations had to be performed and two implants were permanently explanted. In spite of this all, wrist and forearm motion as well as pain reduction was adequate and patient satisfaction was reasonable (72.2%). Conclusion  The Aptis DRUJ arthroplasty is a viable option that can provide adequate wrist and forearm function after secure patient selection and surgical placement of the implant in the wrist with a good bone stock of the radius. The complication rate was found to be high, yet patient satisfaction was reasonable. In the case of secondary surgery, additional surgery seems to be needed. For primary surgery, the implant seems to be successful without complications. Different complications have been described, but further analysis is warranted to find the causes of complications and to objectify the performance of the Aptis DRUJ implant. Level of Evidence  IV.

Long-term results of the AptisTM total distal radioulnar joint prosthesis after previous failed surgical procedures

We present a prospective study with the results of ten Aptis total distal radioulnar joint replacements in patients who had one to five previous operations. The mean postoperative follow-up was 9.7 years (range 3-14.7). The mean postoperative range of motion of the wrist improved by 9° for extension, 15° for flexion, 10° for pronation and 14° for supination, achieving values equivalent to 88%, 78%, 97% and 88% of those of the non-operated hand. There were minimal changes in radial and ulnar deviations. Grip strength improved by 7 kg, pain decreased by 8 points, QuickDASH and Mayo wrist scores improved by 51 and 53 points, respectively. Two implants had radiolucency less than 1 mm. Serum titanium ion levels were slightly elevated in two patients. Three prostheses required revision surgery for heterotopic ossification, a prominent radial screw and a periprosthetic fracture. No prostheses were removed. Six patients returned to their former professional activities and four patients adapted their jobs.Level of evidence: IV.

The semiconstrained DRUJ prosthesis: blessing or curse?

PURPOSE

There are numerous operative procedures to treat osteoarthritic changes or a significant instability of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ). The key problem of most methods is the destabilization of the forearm leading to secondary painful impingement between the radius and ulna, as well as a significant limitation of forearm rotation. The Aptis-Prosthesis designed by Scheker represents a complete substitute for the DRUJ. It is mostly used after the failure of various treatment options to solve the primary problems (arthritis, instability). We have used this type of prosthesis mostly after multiple operative treatments for more than 25 years.

METHODS

In the following retrospective study, we analyzed the data of patients that received an Aptis-prosthesis between 2016 and 2021. We have implanted this prosthesis in 13 cases (11 female, 2 male). Routinely, we document the clinical outcome concerning range of motion (ROM), grip strength, and pain according to numeric rate scaling (NRS) after more than 12 months (month 12-24). In addition, complications, osseous changes, and the rate of loosening of the prosthesis were registered. Furthermore, DASH-Score and patients ' satisfaction were evaluated. Also-as with other implants-follow-up x-rays were performed.

RESULTS

Removal or significant revision of any of the prostheses was not needed. The ROM was 68.1° ± 19.7° for pronation and 72.3° ± 20.9° for supination, grip strength amounted to 27.7 kg ± 11.0 kg equaling 83% of the contralateral side. NRS was 0 at rest and 1.2 (0-2) under weight-bearing. A lysis margin of the radial tap was noted in the radiological examination in 2 patients but without any signs of loosening. The DASH-Score added up to 31.8 ± 13.8 (13-55). All patients were satisfied or very satisfied having this implant.

CONCLUSION

The semiconstrained Aptis-prosthesis is a safe and efficient treatment option after failed DRUJ surgeries. It is striking that of the 20 implanted prostheses no significant revision or explantations were necessary over a period of 25 years.

Performance of the Aptis Distal Radioulnar Joint Implant: A Clinical Case Series Including Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography Kinematic Analysis

High complication rates and surgical revision rates following Aptis implant placement have been reported in the literature. This study evaluates the performance of the Aptis implant of twelve patients using four-dimensional kinematic analysis. The (mean) follow-up was 58 months. Wrist motion, grip strength, and kinematic analysis of both arms were used to investigate possible causes of the reported complications. In nine cases (75%), the proximal to distal translation of the distal radius along the ulnar axis in the affected forearm was too little or absent. Significant correlations were found between postoperative extension and translation of the distal radius along the ulnar axis and between the radial deviation and combined error. The four-dimensional kinematic analysis suggests that the current design of the implant could lead to limited restoration of the position of the forearm rotation axis and the translation of the radius along the ulnar axis.

Retrospective and Prospective Outcomes of Distal Radioulnar Joint Prosthesis Arthroplasty at a Single Center

Purpose

Distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) arthritis can cause painful and limited motion of the forearm leading to decreased function. When conservative treatment options are exhausted, surgical treatments are the next step. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively and prospectively evaluate outcomes of Scheker DRUJ total arthroplasty at a single center and add to the limited data on this procedure.

Methods

In a retrospective and prospective cohort of 12 patients, 13 DRUJ prosthetics implanted from 2014 to 2021 were evaluated from a single center. The primary outcome was patient satisfaction with the procedure, including comparisons of preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, and willingness to repeat the procedure. Secondary outcomes included range of motion, subjective grip strength, need for hardware revision, subsequent procedures, and postoperative complaints.

Results

Out of 12 patients that were at least 1-year after surgery from DRUJ arthroplasty, 1 was deceased at the time of final survey and 1 underwent bilateral DRUJ arthroplasty. Seven of 12 available patients were surveyed over the phone. On average, patient range of motion after surgery was 76° in each direction for pronation and supination. There was a clinically significant improvement in the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score and a statistically significant improvement in visual analog scale pain rating. Seventy-five percent of patients surveyed were satisfied with their outcomes and would undergo the surgery again. Only one patient required additional surgery, and there were no instances of hardware failure at an average follow-up of 40 months.

Conclusions

Our study has shown positive outcomes with decrease in pain, improvement in function via Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand evaluation, and subjective patient satisfaction, with a 100% prosthesis survival rate. The DRUJ arthroplasty prosthesis is a viable alternative to other DRUJ salvage procedures.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic Level III.

Outcome of Preoperative Asymptomatic or Minimally Symptomatic DRUJ Arthritis after Total Wrist Arthrodesis: A Single-Institution Case Series

Background  Concomitant severe radiocarpal (RC) arthritis with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) arthritis can be debilitating for patients. Surgical management of these combined arthritides can pose a dilemma for surgeons and patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patients with concomitant RC and DRUJ arthritides who underwent only total wrist arthrodesis (TWA) to determine the need for subsequent surgical management of preoperative asymptomatic/minimally symptomatic DRUJ arthritis. Materials and Methods  All patients who underwent TWA between 2008 and 2018 at a single institution were evaluated. Those patients who underwent TWA for degenerative, inflammatory, or posttraumatic arthritis with concomitant asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic DRUJ arthritis preoperatively were included. A retrospective review was performed for demographic variables, TWA indications, pre- versus post-TWA DRUJ symptoms, and severity of DRUJ arthritis on radiographs. Primary outcome measure was survivorship from subsequent DRUJ surgery for development of symptomatic arthritis after initial TWA. Results  One hundred and eighty-three patients underwent TWA during the study period, of which 39 wrists met inclusion criteria. Indications for TWA included posttraumatic arthritis ( n  = 22), avascular necrosis of the lunate ( n  = 10), and inflammatory arthritis ( n  = 7). The mean clinical follow-up was 5.7 years (range: 1.5-12.7 years). Four patients (10%) who underwent TWA ultimately required a subsequent procedure to address DRUJ arthritis at a mean time of 20 months (range: 3-60 months) after initial TWA. The initial indication for TWA in these patients included symptomatic posttraumatic arthritis ( n  = 3) and lunate avascular necrosis ( n  = 1). Conclusion  In patients with symptomatic RC and asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic DRUJ arthritides undergoing TWA alone, 10% in this series required subsequent surgical management for progressive DRUJ arthritis. Clinical Relevance  Surgical management of concomitant symptomatic RC and asymptomatic/minimally symptomatic DRUJ arthritides with TWA alone is a reasonable initial approach. Patients should be counseled preoperatively that subsequent surgical management of progressive DRUJ arthritis may be necessary in ∼10% of patients.

Distal Radioulnar Joint Osteoarthritis: An Update on Treatment Options

The distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ), the articulation between the sigmoid notch of the radius and the distal ulna, plays a pivotal role in stability and load bearing and allows for pronation and supination of the forearm. Osteoarthritis (OA) of the DRUJ commonly occurs due to distal radius trauma but may also be the result of conditions such as joint instability, septic arthritis, or primary OA. It is initially managed with conservative therapy, but surgery is often considered when nonoperative methods fail. The surgical approaches available to treat this pathology have grown over the years. The procedures have generally favorable outcomes, each with their own unique complications and considerations. This paper comprises a review of the outcomes and complications for the different procedures commonly used to surgically treat DRUJ OA.

Outcomes following Distal Radioulnar Joint Arthroplasty in the Setting of Total or Partial Wrist Fusion

Purpose  To evaluate the functional outcome and complications following primary ulnar head or total distal radial ulnar joint (DRUJ) arthroplasty in patients who have a partial or total wrist fusion. Methods  We conducted a retrospective review of 33 primary DRUJ implants in 31 patients who had a partial or total wrist fusion. Follow-up time averaged 67 months. There were 11 partial and 22 total wrist fusions with 22 ulnar head prosthesis and 11 total DRUJ implants. The mean age of the patients was 49 years. Eighty-one percent had previous surgeries with an average number of 4.6 previous wrist procedures. Pre- and postoperative pain levels were recorded. Mayo Wrist Scores were calculated. Grip strength, range of motion (ROM), and post-operative complications were noted. Results  The pain scores improved in 67% of the patients. The Mayo Wrist Score improved significantly from a mean of 39 preoperatively to 51 postoperatively. The grip strength and pro-supination remained stable. The wrist ROM also remained stable in the patients with partial wrist fusions. During the follow-up period, 10 (30%) of the DRUJ implants were explanted, with a trend toward higher explantation rates in total wrist fusions with one in the partial fusion group and nine in the total wrist fusion group. Four of the explantations happened in the first postoperative year. Nineteen (61%) of the patients required a second surgery for a DRUJ implant-related complication; this rate was similar between the partial and total fusion groups. Conclusions  DRUJ replacement resulted in improved pain scores and Mayo wrist scores in the majority of patients; however, the combination of primary DRUJ arthroplasty and total wrist fusion was associated with high complication rates. Surgeons should be aware of the high complication rate seen with DRUJ arthroplasty when combined with total wrist fusion.

Midterm Functional Outcome of the Linked Semiconstrained Distal Radioulnar Joint Prosthesis

Background  A painful unstable distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) can seriously compromise hand and wrist function. The semiconstrained prosthesis was developed to restore DRUJ function. To date, most outcome reports are coauthored by the designer. Questions  Does independent reporting confirm the promising results of the semiconstrained DRUJ prosthesis? Are complication and failure rates acceptable? Patients and Methods  We evaluated patients with the semiconstrained DRUJ implant and a minimum follow-up of 2 years. We monitored patient satisfaction and function with functionality questionnaires and measured wrist range of motion, grip, and key pinch strength. Statistical analysis was done using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation coefficients, linear and logistic regression. Results  We included 41 patients with 42 implants. Mean follow-up was 46 months (range: 24-102 months). Eighty percent of wrist had undergone previous surgery. We found a mean pronation of 83 degrees (0-90 degrees), supination of 70 degrees (0-90 degrees), flexion of 42 degrees (0-90 degrees), extension of 49 degrees (0-90 degrees), ulnar deviation of 24 degrees (0-60 degrees), and radial deviation of 14 degrees (0-40 degrees). Grip and key pinch strength were 20.1 (1-50 kg) and 6 kg (1-12 kg), respectively. Average patient-rated wrist and hand evaluation score was 42.7 (0-95), disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand score was 38 (0-88), and visual analog scale score was 3.6 (0-8). We found a 43% complication rate (mostly minor: ulnar or radial tendinopathy, temporary hypoesthesia) with 24% reoperation and 92% prosthesis survival rate. Conclusion  The linked semiconstrained DRUJ prosthesis has its value in the surgical treatment of DRUJ failure. Currently, most implants are used in secondary surgery and multioperated wrists. More research is required to assess the value of the DRUJ prosthesis as a primary procedure. Level of evidence  This is a level IV, therapeutic study.

Clinical and radiological results of distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty with the Aptis prosthesis

We report the results of the treatment of disorders of the distal radioulnar joint with the semi-constrained Aptis prosthesis. Nineteen patients were assessed at a mean follow-up of 7 years. All patients had been operated on previously at the wrist, forearm or elbow. The Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand score had a mean value of 40, the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score had a mean of 49 and the visual analogue scale for pain had a mean of 3.9. The mean ranges of pronation, supination, wrist flexion and wrist extension were 78°, 76°, 60° and 51°, respectively. The mean grip strength was 23 kg. Complications were noted in ten patients. Eighteen patients would undergo the operation again. The 10-year cumulative survival rate was 84%. The Aptis prosthesis may be a solution to treat patients in whom previous surgery at the distal radioulnar joint has failed.Level of evidence: IV.

Distal Radio-Ulnar Joint Reconstruction after failed Darrach operation using free autogenous second toe Metatarso-phalangeal joint transfer. Development of the technique and a long-term (over 25 year) follow-up

During the development of microvascular surgery in 1980-95 many new methods to overcome different traumatic disorders were studied. Previously unsolved problems could be treated using free tissue transfer. Typical problems in wrist surgery were the painful complications from ulna head resection. No sound or acceptable artificial protheses for ulna head were available. Author did study the possibilities of reversal of resected ulna head using an autogenous microvascular joint transfer. First it was done using cadaver models and evaluating the possibilities of a toe MTP-II joint in replacing the distal radio-ulnar joint. Then same principle was used in three clinical cases. All patients had suffered a poor result after ulna head resection or Darrach procedure. First two cases had complications but third case from year 1994 resulted in a good outcome. This paper introduces the development of a surgical technique for the replacement of the resected ulna head. Also, it will describe the excellent long-term result achieved in the last case with 26-year follow-up. Although today many sophisticated prosthetic replacement techniques have become developed for this purpose, this kind of autogenous reconstruction might have a place in treating similar problems in young posttraumatic patients. Also it demonstrates the potential benefit of microsurgery in a difficult wrist problem.