Comparison of Wear Rate between Ceramic-on-Ceramic, Metal on Highly Cross-linked Polyethylene, and Metal-on-Metal Bearings

Magnetic Resonance Safety Evaluation of a Novel Alumina Matrix Composite Ceramic Knee and Image Artifact Comparison to a Metal Knee Implant of Analogous Design

Background

Image artifacts caused by metal knee implants in 1.5T and 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems complicate imaging-based diagnosis of the peri-implant region after total knee arthroplasty. Alternatively, metal-free knee prostheses could effectively minimize MRI safety hazards and offer the potential for higher quality diagnostic images.

Methods

A novel knee arthroplasty device composed of BIOLOX delta, an alumina matrix composite (AMC) ceramic, was tested in a magnetic resonance (MR) environment. American Society for Testing and Materials test methods were used for evaluating magnetically induced displacement force, magnetically induced torque, radiofrequency-induced heating, and MR image artifact.

Results

Magnetically induced displacement force and magnetically induced torque results of the AMC ceramic knee indicated that these effects do not pose a known risk in a clinical MR environment, as assessed in a 3T magnetic field. Moreover, minimal radiofrequency-induced heating of the device was observed. In addition, the AMC ceramic knee demonstrated minimal MR image artifacts (7 mm) in comparison to a cobalt-chromium knee (88 mm). The extremely low magnetic susceptibility of AMC (2 ppm) underlines that it is a nonmetallic and nonmagnetic material well suited for the manufacturing of MR Safe orthopaedic implants.

Conclusions

The AMC ceramic knee is a novel metal-free total knee arthroplasty device that can be regarded as MR Safe, as suggested by the absence of hazards from the exposure of this implant to a MR environment. The AMC ceramic knee presents the advantage of being scanned with superior imaging results in 3T MRI systems compared to alternative metal implants on the market.

[Tribology in hip arthroplasty : Benefits of different materials]

When it comes to total hip replacements, choosing the suitable material combination is of clinical relevance. The present review article examines the technical differences in wear and corrosion of the relevant material combinations of ceramics, metals, ceramized metals and various types of polyethylene. The material characteristics, which were often tested under standardized conditions in the laboratory, are compared with clinical results on the basis of evidence-graded clinical studies and on the basis of register studies. This article thus represents an up-to-date snapshot of the expectations and actual clinical outcomes of the present choice of material combinations. It shows that some tendencies from the field of materials research, e.g. with regard to cross-linked polyethylene, coincide with observations from practical clinical experience, while for other materials, a proven technical superiority has not yet been confirmed as an evident advantage in clinical practice.