Is The Size of the Currently Available Implants for Total Hip Arthroplasty Adequate for Our Population?

A smaller femoral stem is needed for asian females

BACKGROUND

Current femoral implants are manufactured based on Western anatomical structures and may be too large for smaller physiques, such as those of Asian females. This study reviewed the femoral stem size distribution used in a high-volume total hip arthroplasty (THA) practice and evaluated malalignment in patients receiving a size one implant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A consecutive cohort of female patients self-reported as Asian (257 patients, 331 hips) or Caucasian (158 patients and 190 hips) were retrospectively evaluated. A single femoral stem type was used in all cases, performed by a single surgeon. Global hip offset (GHO) and leg length difference (LLD) were measured before and 6 weeks following THA. Differences between races were evaluated through Mann-Whitney U tests and chi-squared tests for continuous and categorical variables, respectively.

RESULTS

The proportion of size one implants was higher amongst Asian patients (20.5%) than Caucasian patients (2.6%) (p < 0.001). A LLD greater than 6 mm was noted in 24.6% of size one patients and 11.4% of all other sizes (p = 0.010). Varus malalignment occurred in 47.9% of size one patients and 22.1% of all other sizes (p < 0.001). No fractures occurred in size one patients, and nine fractures (one intraoperative and eight post-operative) occurred in all other sizes (p = 0.258).

CONCLUSION

The high proportion of size one stems required in Asian females and the higher incidence of LLD > 6 mm and varus malalignment suggest a distinct need for smaller femoral implants, especially for Asian females.

Cementless femoral stem fixation and leg-length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty in different proximal femoral morphological types

PURPOSE

Leg-length changes at total hip arthroplasty (THA) may result from too proximal position of the femoral component, i.e. not being sunk deep enough into the femoral canal due to the size and shape of both medullary canal and implant. Some femoral implants are designed to achieve such fixation in the mediolateral dimension, while others also engage the bone anteroposteriorly. Our aim was to examine the relationship between proximal femoral morphology, osseointegration and leg-length equalization at THA. We asked whether the Dorr classification, femoral cortical index and canal flare index on preoperative radiographs had significant impact on THA aseptic loosening rates and post-operative leg-length discrepancy (LLD).

METHODS

Literature review included original articles on proximal femoral morphology with post-operative LLD and other clinical outcomes of THA, published in the last decade. Case reports and biomechanical studies without clinical data were excluded.

RESULTS

Higher femoral cortical index and/or canal flare index (corresponding to the Dorr type A) increases the risk of leg lengthening at THA. This is particularly notable in femoral stems with metaphyseal fixation, where high canal flare index has also been linked to osseointegration failure and implant loosening. On the other hand, lower canal flare index (corresponding to the Dorr type C) is more prevalent in the elderly population and increases late periprosthetic fracture rates and stress shielding. Even the most commonly used cementless femoral stems cannot offer optimal fit to intra-/extramedullary geometry or offset restoration in up to 30% of clinical cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Femoral morphology can have significant impact on post-operative LLD and osseointegration of cementless THA. Quantitative measurements of the proximal femoral canal may improve the choice of a particular implant and fixation method.