Current and Future Medical Therapies for Adenomyosis

Endometriosis and adenomyosis unveiled through single-cell glasses

Single-cell technologies are expanding our understanding of endometriosis and adenomyosis, which are sister disorders of the uterine endometrium that contain similar complements of lesion cell types but in different locations-outside and inside the uterus, respectively. Both diseases cause significant morbidity and impaired quality of life among those affected, and current therapies mitigate most of the symptoms although with highly variable efficacy, duration of effect, and frequent intolerable side effects. Thus, there is a pressing need for transformative approaches and to develop individualized therapies for the variety of presentations of endometriosis and adenomyosis symptoms and the heterogeneity of lesion types, both histologically and architecturally. Single-cell technologies are transforming the understanding of human physiology and pathophysiology in the reproductive system and beyond. This manuscript reviews the clinical characteristics of endometriosis and adenomyosis and the recent studies focused on eutopic endometrium and ectopic lesions at single-cell resolution, the myriad of cell types and subtypes, cell-cell communications, signaling pathways, applications for novel drug discovery and therapeutic approaches, and challenges and opportunities that accompany this type of research. Key take-home messages from the studies reviewed herein include the following: We conclude the review with an eye to the future-what Alice might see beyond the single-cell looking glass that connects endometrium and endometrial disorders with the trillions of cells of other tissues and organs in health and disease throughout the human body and the opportunities for novel diagnostic modalities and drug discovery for endometriosis, adenomyosis, and related uterine and inflammatory conditions.

Efficacy and safety of hormone therapies for treating adenomyosis-associated pelvic pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

To date, there are no clear guidelines available on the treatment of adenomyosis-associated pelvic pain (AAPP); however, numerous hormonal treatments (HTs) are currently being used off-label. We conducted a systematic review and network metanalysis with the aim of assessing the efficacy and safety of HTs to reduce AAPP and ranking the available options.

Methods

MEDLINE, LILACS, EMBASE, Scielo.br, PROSPERO, Cochrane Library, conference proceedings, and international registries were searched with no time, region, or language restrictions. Randomized controlled trials that analyzed AAPP in women undergoing HTs were deemed suitable.

Results

Six studies (563 women affected by adenomyosis) were included. At 3 months, women who received a placebo or a levonorgestrel-based intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) experienced more AAPP than those who received dienogest [mean difference of visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores (MD) 4.10 (95% CI 0.49 to 7.71); high evidence; MD 3.05 (95% CI 0.45 to 5.65); high evidence]. At 6 months, women who received dienogest experienced significantly less AAPP compared to those who received combined oral contraceptives [MD -2.85 (95% CI -5.30 to -0.39); moderate evidence], while the prevalence of AAPP was higher among those who received a LNG-IUS than those who received dienogest [MD 1.79 (95% CI 0.06 to 3.53); low evidence].

Conclusion

Dienogest seems to be the most effective HT for AAPP. However, although rare, it is also related to more adverse effects compared to other HTs.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024535472.

Dienogest treatment of symptomatic adenomyosis: An in-depth meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Adenomyosis is a common gynecological disease and a major contributor to dysmenorrhea that substantially reduces the quality of life of the affected. Dienogest has emerged as a promising drug for treating adenomyosis. A few systematic reviews and meta-analyses on this topic have been published recently. However, these meta-analyses were typically based on 2-7 studies, even though numerical data could have been extracted and more studies have been published. Moreover, it is unclear whether there is any characteristic of the patients that is associated with more pronounced improvement after treatment, or which patient subgroup, if any, would benefit most from the dienogest treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of dienogest in alleviating dysmenorrhea associated with adenomyosis and identifying study/patient characteristics that contribute to a better therapeutic response.

DESIGN

An in-depth meta-analysis incorporating more recent published studies.

METHODS

An in-depth meta-analysis of 14 studies published up to March 2024, involving 637 patients was conducted, using the visual analog scale (VAS) scores on dysmenorrhea severity as the primary outcome measure. Subgroup analyses and multivariable regression were performed to explore potential factors influencing the treatment effect.

RESULTS

Dienogest significantly improved dysmenorrhea, with a mean reduction in VAS scores of 6 on a 10-point scale. Subgroup analyses indicated that dienogest was effective across varying severities of dysmenorrhea and different treatment durations. Notably, patients with higher baseline VAS scores and longer treatment durations experienced greater reductions in VAS scores.

CONCLUSION

Dienogest substantially alleviates dysmenorrhea in women with adenomyosis, particularly among those with severe baseline dysmenorrhea and extended treatment periods. However, variability in patient responses and the potential for adverse effects underscores the importance of individualized treatment strategies. Further large-scale, long-term comparative studies and randomized clinical trials are warranted to optimize treatment outcomes and better understand patient-specific factors.

The oral GnRH antagonists, a new class of drugs in gynecology: from pharmacokinetics to possible clinical applications

INTRODUCTION

In ovarian steroid-dependent diseases such as uterine fibroids, endometriosis and adenomyosis, oral GnRH antagonists have emerged as new therapeutic alternatives. These oral GnRH antagonists offer key advantages, including oral administration, dose-dependent estrogen suppression and rapid reversibility.

AREAS COVERED

This review examines the pharmacological, clinical and therapeutic profiles of the latest non-peptide oral GnRH antagonists, through an analysis of clinical evidence and randomized clinical trials, to provide a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of their clinical applications and potential benefits.

EXPERT OPINION

The clinical trials examined demonstrated significant efficacy in reducing heavy menstrual bleeding in women with fibroids and pelvic pain in women with endometriosis, with more than 70% of patients achieving primary endpoints. The use of add-back therapy minimized bone mass density loss, ensuring long-term safety. Adverse events were dose-dependent but generally well tolerated. In our opinion, the strength of oral GnRH antagonists lies in their pharmacological properties. Oral administration increases convenience, allows adjustable dosing and ensures a dose-dependent effect. These drugs provide an immediate antagonistic effect without the flare-up phenomenon. Furthermore, they are expected to act on ectopic endometrial and smooth muscle cell receptors, potentially providing additional anti-proliferative effects. However, further research is needed: long term clinical trials must compare them with existing treatments.

Efficacy and uterine bleeding patterns in initiating goserelin therapy during different menstrual phases in patients with adenomyosis: a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

We carried out this study to explore the possibility of initiating goserelin therapy during the non-menstrual period in patients diagnosed with adenomyosis.

METHODS

115 premenopausal adenomyosis patients were enrolled and divided into three groups based on their menstrual cycle phase during the initial outpatient visit: menstrual, follicular, and luteal. Each received a 3.6 mg subcutaneous dose of goserelin monthly for three months. The endpoints encompassed alterations in uterine volume, dysmenorrhea Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score, CA125 level, hemoglobin (HGB) after a 12-week treatment course, and the occurrence and duration of uterine hemorrhage during the first treatment cycle.

RESULTS

Analysis revealed that the timing of goserelin therapy initiation in the menstrual cycle did not significantly impact its effectiveness in reducing uterine size, alleviating pain, lowering CA125 levels, or improving hemoglobin concentrations. However, patients starting treatment during the luteal phase experienced increased uterine bleeding (reference: menstrual period, OR = 4.33, 95% CI 1.23-15.25, p = .023).

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggested non-inferiority of goserelin therapy initiated during the non-menstrual period, but the uterine bleeding rate was higher in the luteal phase group. Therefore, goserelin treatment for outpatient adenomyosis patients should not be limited to starting during the menstrual period; it can also be initiated outside the menstrual period, providing more convenience for patients as most consultations occur outside the menstrual period. However, the use of goserelin during the luteal phase should be avoided to reduce the risk of exacerbated bleeding, especially in anemic patients with heavy menstrual bleeding. This study highlights the importance of individualizing treatment initiation based on the patient's health profile to optimize therapeutic outcomes and minimize adverse effects.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR2200059548.

Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery for Gynecologic Indications

Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS) appears to be an effective and safe treatment for uterine fibroids and adenomyosis, particularly in women who wish to preserve fertility. In abdominal wall endometriosis and painful recurrent gynecologic malignancies, MRgFUS can relieve pain, but more research is needed. There is no widespread reimbursement due to the lack of large prospective or randomized controlled trials comparing MRgFUS with standard therapy.

The use of dienogest in treatment of symptomatic adenomyosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Adenomyosis is a gynaecological problem that impacts women's quality of life by causing dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, and menorrhagia. The search continues for the best medical treatment for symptomatic adenomyosis. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the role of dienogest, an oral progestin, in reducing pain and bleeding associated with adenomyosis. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched in January 2024. The primary outcome was pain scores for dysmenorrhea, whereas secondary outcomes were chronic pelvic pain (CPP), uterine volume (UV), and menorrhagia. One comparison was performed comparing outcomes in symptomatic adenomyosis before and after treatment with dienogest. Pooled analysis of included studies reported a statistically significant reduction of dysmenorrhea pain score after dienogest treatment (mean difference -5.86 cm on a 10-cm visual analogue scale, 95 % CI -7.20 to -4.53, I2 = 97 %). Regarding chronic pelvic pain, a meta-analysis of included studies showed a significant decline in pain after treatment (standardized mean difference -2.37, 95 % CI -2.89 to -1.86, I2 = 60 %). However, uterine volume did not differ significantly after treatment (mean difference -4.65 cm3, 95 % CI -43.22 to 33.91). Menorrhagia was improved significantly after treatment (Peto odds ratio 0.07, 95 % CI 0.03 to 0.18). In conclusion, dienogest seems to be effective in controlling painful symptoms and uterine bleeding in women with adenomyosis at short and long-term therapy.

A systematic review and Bayesian analysis of the adverse effects of dienogest

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Endometriosis and adenomyosis are two common diseases that impair women's health, and dienogest is one of the pharmacologic treatments which is the first-line therapeutic option for patients with pelvic pain and individuals who have no desire for immediate pregnancy. The goal of this study was to summarize the current evidence of adverse events associated with dienogest as well as the prevalence of these adverse events during treatment with dienogest.

METHODS

Several databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central and Clinicaltrials.gov, etc.) and the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Public Dashboard were searched on May 31, 2023, using the topic words alongside free words of dienogest and "adverse reaction". Studies were incorporated into this research if they reported or assessed safety issues or adverse reactions of dienogest during the period of endometriosis treatment or adenomyosis therapy. The extracted information comprised trial design, dienogest and control group demographics, as well as reported side effects.

RESULTS

This systematic review comprehended 39 publications in total. The mean age of patients in the included studies was 34.43 years. The follow-up duration varied from 3 to 60 months. Most adverse reactions were common and not serious, and the most common adverse reactions during dienogest medication were abnormal uterine bleeding (55%, 95% CI 37-73%), amenorrhea (17%, 95% CI 2-42%) and swelling (13%, 95% CI 3-28%). Uncommon adverse reactions included dysmenorrhea (0.2%, n = 1), dyspepsia (0.4%, n = 1), and (lower) abdominal pain (1%, 95% CI 0-3%), urticaria (1%, 95% CI 0-3%) and peritonitis (1%, n = 1). Serious adverse reactions including decreased lumbar spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), depression, peritonitis and so on have been reported. Heterogeneity assessment revealed that patient number and study design are influencing factors to adverse reaction prevalence. Moreover, abdominal pain, diarrhea, nausea and vomiting, back pain and anemia are side effects reported both in the FAERS database and in the systematic review.

CONCLUSIONS

Dienogest's most frequent side effects were not severe. Dienogest is generally safe for treating endometriosis and adenomyosis. Nevertheless, people should be aware of serious adverse reactions, such as decreased lumbar spine BMD and hemorrhagic shock.

Endometriosis and Adenomyosis: Modern Concepts of Their Clinical Outcomes, Treatment, and Management

Endometriosis and adenomyosis are complex gynecological conditions characterized by diverse clinical presentations, including superficial peritoneal endometriosis (SPE), ovarian endometrioma (OMA), and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). The hallmark features of these pathologies involve the manifestation of pain symptoms and infertility, and approximately 30% of patients are asymptomatic. Despite ongoing research, definitive treatments for these conditions remain elusive, and clinical management primarily revolves around medical or surgical interventions. Recent advancements in our understanding of the efficacy of various treatment modalities, including medical therapy and surgical interventions, have provided clinicians with valuable insights into pain relief and fertility preservation. This review aims to provide an updated overview of the latest literature on clinical outcomes, treatment options, and management strategies for different types of endometriosis. By synthesizing the newest available data, this review seeks to inform clinicians and guide decision making based on factors such as patients' symptom severity, childbearing desire, and overall health.

Meclizine improves endometrial repair and reduces simulated menstrual bleeding in mice with induced adenomyosis

BACKGROUND

Adenomyosis is one of the structural causes of abnormal uterine bleeding, which often presents as heavy menstrual bleeding. Mostly because of the poor understanding of its pathophysiology, medical management of adenomyosis-induced heavy menstrual bleeding is still a challenge. We have previously reported that glycolysis is crucial to endometrial repair following menstruation and that suppressed glycolysis can cause heavy menstrual bleeding.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to test the hypothesis that meclizine, a drug with an excellent safety profile, alleviates heavy menstrual bleeding in mice with induced adenomyosis using a simulated menstruation model.

STUDY DESIGN

Adenomyosis was induced in 36 female C57BL/6 mice using endometrial-myometrial interface disruption. Three months after induction, the mice were randomly divided into the following 3 groups: low-dose meclizine, high-dose meclizine, and controls. Treatment with meclizine or vehicle started shortly before the simulated menstruation procedure and ended before progesterone withdrawal. The amount of blood loss was quantified and uterine tissue was harvested for histologic evaluation of the grade of endometrial repair. We performed immunohistochemistry analysis of 4 proteins critically involved in glycolysis: Glut1 (glucose transporter 1), Hk2 (hexokinase 2), Pfkfb3 (6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-biphosphatase 3), and Pkm2 (pyruvate kinase M2). The extent of tissue fibrosis in both ectopic and eutopic endometria was evaluated using Masson trichrome staining.

RESULTS

In mice with induced adenomyosis, meclizine accelerated endometrial repair in a dose-dependent manner and reduced the amount of menstrual bleeding. Meclizine administration raised endometrial immunoexpression of Hk2 and Pfkfb3 but not of Glut1 or Pkm2. The extent of endometrial fibrosis was reduced following the meclizine administration. Remarkably, these favorable changes were accompanied by the suppression of lesional progression, as evidenced by the dose-dependent reduction in the extent of fibrosis (a surrogate for lesional progression).

CONCLUSION

These encouraging results, taken together, suggest that glycolysis may be a promising therapeutic target and that meclizine may hold therapeutic potential as a nonhormonal treatment for adenomyosis-induced heavy menstrual bleeding without exacerbating the disease.

Health benefits of combined oral contraceptives - a narrative review

PURPOSE

This review presents an update of the non-contraceptive health benefits of the combined oral contraceptive pill.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search for (review) articles that discussed the health benefits of combined oral contraceptives (COCs), in the period from 1980 to 2023.

RESULTS

We identified 21 subjective and/or objective health benefits of COCs related to (i) the reproductive tract, (ii) non-gynaecological benign disorders and (iii) malignancies. Reproductive tract benefits are related to menstrual bleeding(including anaemia and toxic shock syndrome), dysmenorrhoea, migraine, premenstrual syndrome (PMS), ovarian cysts, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS), androgen related symptoms, ectopic pregnancy, hypoestrogenism, endometriosis and adenomyosis, uterine fibroids and pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). Non-gynaecological benefits are related to benign breast disease, osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, asthma and porphyria. Health benefits of COCs related to cancer are lower risks of endometrial cancer, ovarian cancer and colorectal cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of combined oral contraceptives is accompanied with a range of health benefits, to be balanced against its side-effects and risks. Several health benefits of COCs are a reason for non-contraceptive COC prescription.

Women's experiences of the diagnostic journey in uterine adenomyosis: a scoping review protocol

INTRODUCTION

Uterine adenomyosis is a benign gynaecological disease that causes physical and psychological problems, impacting on relationships. It is poorly understood and consequently may be diagnosed late. This protocol describes the process of conducting a systematic scoping review to retrieve and describe literature examining the daily experience and impact of living with uterine adenomyosis. It will explore the journey to diagnosis (and perceptions of what this process is like); identify the main concepts currently used in the literature and highlight gaps in knowledge for future research in relevant populations.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology, the population-concept-context approach is used to form clear review questions. A three-phase search strategy will locate published and unpublished evidence from multiple sources. All articles reporting on the personal experiences of women diagnosed with uterine adenomyosis will be considered. Findings from qualitative, quantitative and mixed-method study designs from all settings will be included, not limited by geography but restricted to English. Documents will be screened by the primary researcher, supported by university supervisors. Search outputs will be presented using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 flow diagram. No formal quality appraisal will be conducted. Review findings will be descriptively collated and reported consistent with the Scoping Review Extension of the PRISMA checklist. Patient and public involvement engagement reflected a positive response for the project that this protocol supports.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

As primary data will not be collected, formal ethical approval is not required. Prepared as part of a professional doctorate thesis, the findings of this study will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, support groups and social media networks.

Efficacy and safety of percutaneous microwave ablation for adenomyosis in the posterior uterine wall

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous microwave ablation (PMWA) for treating adenomyosis in the posterior uterine wall.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients with symptomatic adenomyosis in the posterior uterine wall who had been subjected to PMWA were retrospectively enrolled in this study. 20 patients who had no ideal transabdominal puncture path due to the retroverted or retroflexed uterine position were treated with PMWA combined with Yu's uteropexy (Group 1). The other 16 patients were treated with PMWA only (Group 2). The non-perfused volume (NPV) ratio, symptomatic relief rate, recurrence rate, changes in clinical symptom scores, economic cost, and complications were compared.

RESULTS

The mean NPV ratio for the 36 patients was 90.2±18.3%, and the percentage of patients who obtained complete relief of dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia was 81.3% (26/32), and 69.6% (16/23) respectively. The recurrence rate was 11.1% (4/36). No major complication was observed. Minor complications included lower abdominal pain, fever, vaginal discharge, nausea, and/or vomiting after ablation, with incidences of 55.6%, 41.7%, 47.2%, and 19.4% respectively. Subgroup analysis showed no significant difference in the median value of NPV ratio, symptomatic relief rate of dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia, changes in clinical symptom scores, recurrence rate and economic cost between the two groups (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

PMWA is an effective and safe treatment for adenomyosis in the posterior uterine wall.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This study focused on the ultrasound-guided PMWA treatment for adenomyosis in the posterior uterine wall. Yu's uteropexy, a new ancillary technique allowing safe PMWA for deep posterior uterine wall lesions in retroverted uterus, expanded the indications of PMWA for symptomatic adenomyosis.

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for adenomyosis with abnormal uterine bleeding: clinical outcome and associated factors

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the factors affecting the efficacy of ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (PMWA) for adenomyosis with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB-A).

METHODS

Baseline data of patients with AUB-A who underwent US-guided PMWA treatment between October 2020 and October 2021, including demography characteristics, laboratory and imaging examination results were retrospectively analyzed. 3D reconstruction of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was applied to quantitatively assess the local treatment responses, including ratio of non-perfusion volume to adenomyosis volume (NPVr), ablation rate of the endometrial-myometrial junction (EMJ), and surface area (SA) of the ablated part of the EMJ. Patients were followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment, and divided into two groups: group with complete relief (CR), and group with partial relief (PR) or no relief (NR). Data were compared between them.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were analyzed with a mean age of 38.7 ± 6.8 years (range: 24-48): 48.4% (15/31), 63.3% (19/30), and 65.5% (19/29) achieved CR at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. In univariate analysis, compared with the PR/NR group, serum CA125 levels were significantly lower in CR group at 3 months, while ablation rates of EMJ and SA of the ablated part of the EMJ were significantly higher at the three time points. Other baseline characteristics and NPVr did not differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Baseline CA125 and ablation rate of the EMJ and SA of the ablated part of the EMJ are associated with the outcome of AUB-A patients after US-guided PMWA treatment.

Effect of Mifepristone vs Placebo for Treatment of Adenomyosis With Pain Symptoms: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Adenomyosis is a common chronic gynecological disorder, and its treatment is an unmet need. New therapies need to be developed. Mifepristone is being tested for adenomyosis treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether mifepristone is effective and safe for adenomyosis treatment.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted in 10 hospitals in China. In total, 134 patients with adenomyosis pain symptoms were enrolled. Trial enrollment began in May 2018 and was completed in April 2019, and analyses were conducted from October 2019 to February 2020.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive mifepristone 10 mg or placebo orally once a day for 12 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary end point was the change in adenomyosis-associated dysmenorrhea intensity, evaluated by the visual analog scale (VAS) after 12 weeks of treatment. Secondary end points included the change in menstrual blood loss, increased level of hemoglobin in patients with anemia, CA125 level, platelet count, and uterine volume after 12 weeks of treatment. Safety was assessed according to adverse events, vital signs, gynecological examinations, and laboratory evaluations.

RESULTS

In total, 134 patients with adenomyosis and dysmenorrhea were randomly assigned, and 126 patients were included in the efficacy analysis, including 61 patients (mean [SD] age, 40.2 [4.6] years) randomized to receive mifepristone and 65 patients (mean [SD] age, 41.7 [5.0] years) randomized to received the placebo. The characteristics of the included patients at baseline were similar between groups. The mean (SD) change in VAS score was -6.63 (1.92) in the mifepristone group and -0.95 (1.75) in the placebo group (P < .001). The total remission rates for dysmenorrhea in the mifepristone group were significantly better than those in the placebo group (effective remission: 56 patients [91.8%] vs 15 patients [23.1%]; complete remission: 54 patients [88.5%] vs 4 patients [6.2%]). All the secondary end points showed significant improvements after mifepristone treatment for menstrual blood loss, hemoglobin (mean [SD] change from baseline: 2.13 [1.38] g/dL vs 0.48 [0.97] g/dL; P < .001), CA125 (mean [SD] change from baseline: -62.23 [76.99] U/mL vs 26.89 [118.70] U/mL; P < .001), platelet count (mean [SD] change from baseline: -28.87 [54.30]×103/µL vs 2.06 [41.78]×103/µL; P < .001), and uterine volume (mean [SD] change from baseline: -29.32 [39.34] cm3 vs 18.39 [66.46] cm3; P < .001). Safety analysis revealed no significant difference between groups, and no serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This randomized clinical trial showed that mifepristone could be a new option for treating patients with adenomyosis, based on its efficacy and acceptable tolerability.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03520439.

Individualized conservative therapeutic strategies for adenomyosis with the aim of preserving fertility

Adenomyosis is a diffuse or localized organic disease caused by benign invasion of endometrial glands and stroma into the myometrium. It is a common disease that seriously affects reproductive health of women in childbearing age. Due to the unknown etiology and pathophysiological mechanism, and the lack of unified diagnostic criteria and effective treatment methods, total or subtotal hysterectomy has become a radical treatment for adenomyosis, which will lead to the complete loss of fertility. With the continuous exploration of the treatment to adenomyotic patients who have infertility or fertility intentions, new drugs, surgical methods and treating concepts appears. Adopt individualized conservative therapeutic strategies for patients with different conditions, preserve the uterus as much as possible and protect the patient’s fertility, which will play an important role on the follow-up assisted reproductive treatment and long-term management of adenomyosis.

Changes in adenomyosis following elagolix vs leuprolide treatment in a patient with pelvic pain and infertility: A case report

Adenomyosis is a uterine form of endometriosis that poses unique challenges in the management of infertility. Severe pelvic pain and menorrhagia associated with these conditions are commonly managed with intramuscular injections of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (leuprolide acetate). Since receiving approval by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2018, a novel oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, elagolix, has also been increasingly used to manage endometriosis-associated pain. However, the efficacy of elagolix in the treatment of adenomyosis and infertility remains uncertain. In this clinical case of an infertile patient with endometriosis and diminished ovarian reserve, treatment with elagolix effectively controlled her severe endometriosis-related pelvic pain but, surprisingly, failed to prevent concurrent progression of adenomyosis. Subsequently, elagolix was changed to treatment with leuprolide acetate, which led to improvement of adenomyosis in preparation for an embryo transfer during an in vitro fertilization cycle. Women's health providers should be aware that elagolix may not as effectively suppress adenomyosis as leuprolide acetate, particularly in infertility patients undergoing treatment with assisted reproductive technologies.

Transvaginal ultrasound- and laparoscopy-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for adenomyosis has short- and long-term benefits: a single-center study

OBJECTIVES

Transvaginal ultrasound- and laparoscopy-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (TLPMA) is a minimally invasive alternative technique with low risk, fast recovery and few side effects. We aimed to evaluate the safety and long-term efficacy of TLPMA for treating adenomyosis.

METHODS

We included 79 patients with symptomatic adenomyosis who underwent TLPMA and 44 patients with adenomyosis who received the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS). We evaluated the role of laparoscopy in TLPMA as well as the short- and long-term effects of TLPMA.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 79 patients who underwent TLPMA was 41.8 years. There was no difference in the mean age between the TLPMA and LNG-IUS groups. Laparoscopy could help to separate pelvic adhesions, provide a wide antenna path, and observe the uterine surface and bowel movement. No major complications were found in patients who underwent TLPMA. There was a significant post-treatment reduction in both the uterine and lesion volumes (p < 0.001). After a median follow-up duration of 36 months (range: 1-60 months), the uterine and lesion volumes remained stable. Additionally, most patients remained without dysmenorrhea, which confirms the long-term efficacy of TLPMA.

CONCLUSIONS

TLPMA is a feasible, minimally invasive technique for the treatment of adenomyosis, which significantly decreases the uterine and lesion volumes and has a good long-term effect.

In Search of an Imaging Classification of Adenomyosis: A Role for Elastography?

Adenomyosis is a complex and poorly understood gynecological disease. It used to be diagnosed exclusively by histology after hysterectomy; today its diagnosis is carried out increasingly by imaging techniques, including transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, the lack of a consensus on a classification system hampers relating imaging findings with disease severity or with the histopathological features of the disease, making it difficult to properly inform patients and clinicians regarding prognosis and appropriate management, as well as to compare different studies. Capitalizing on our grasp of key features of lesional natural history, here we propose adding elastographic findings into a new imaging classification of adenomyosis, incorporating affected area, pattern, the stiffest value of adenomyotic lesions as well as the neighboring tissues, and other pathologies. We argue that the tissue stiffness as measured by elastography, which has a wider dynamic detection range, quantitates a fundamental biologic property that directs cell function and fate in tissues, and correlates with the extent of lesional fibrosis, a proxy for lesional "age" known to correlate with vascularity and hormonal receptor activity. With this new addition, we believe that the resulting classification system could better inform patients and clinicians regarding prognosis and the most appropriate treatment modality, thus filling a void.

Impact of Adenomyosis on Infertile Patients-Therapy Options and Reproductive Outcomes

Adenomyosis is associated with a negative impact on reproductive outcomes. Although adenomyosis is detected more frequently in women of late reproductive age, its impact on pregnancy rates is important because, in today's world, family planning has shifted towards the late reproductive phase of life for many women. Although the diagnostic indications for imaging studies are well-known, we lack strict diagnostic criteria and classification systems concerning the extent of the disease. Selecting the optimal evidence-based treatment option for adenomyosis is difficult because of the paucity of evidence concerning the association between fertility and the degree and composition of adenomyosis. Furthermore, the treatment of infertility might interfere with the treatment of adenomyosis due to the presence of pain. The aim of this review is to analyze the association between adenomyosis and infertility, and describe treatment options to enhance reproductive outcomes. The following aspects will be addressed in detail: (a) prevalence and causes of adenomyosis, (b) diagnostic tools with imaging techniques, (c) clinical symptoms, (d) proposed pathomechanism of adenomyosis and infertility, and (e) different treatment approaches (pharmacological, surgical, others) and their impact on reproductive outcomes.

Cracking the enigma of adenomyosis: an update on its pathogenesis and pathophysiology

In brief

Traditionally viewed as enigmatic and elusive, adenomyosis is a fairly common gynecological disease but is under-recognized and under-researched. This review summarizes the latest development on the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of adenomyosis, which have important implications for imaging diagnosis of the disease and for the development of non-hormonal therapeutics.

Abstract

Traditionally considered as an enigmatic disease, adenomyosis is a uterine disease that affects many women of reproductive age and is a contributing factor for pelvic pain, heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB), and subfertility. In this review, the new development in the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of adenomyosis has been summarized, along with their clinical implications. After reviewing the progress in our understanding of the pathogenesis and describing the prevailing theories, in conjunction with their deficiencies, a new hypothesis, called endometrial-myometrial interface disruption (EMID), which is backed by extensive epidemiologic data and demonstrated by a mouse model, is reviewed, along with recent data implicating the role of Schwann cells in the EMI area in the genesis of adenomyosis. Additionally, the natural history of adenomyotic lesions is elaborated and underscores that, in essence, adenomyotic lesions are fundamentally wounds undergoing repeated tissue injury and repair (ReTIAR), which progress to fibrosis through epithelial-mesenchymal transition, fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transdifferentiation, and smooth muscle metaplasia. Increasing lesional fibrosis propagates into the neighboring EMI and endometrium. The increased endometrial fibrosis, with ensuing greater tissue stiffness, results in attenuated prostaglandin E2, hypoxia signaling and glycolysis, impairing endometrial repair and causing HMB. Compared with adenomyosis-associated HMB, the mechanisms underlying adenomyosis-associated pain are less understood but presumably involve increased uterine contractility, hyperinnervation, increased lesional production of pain mediators, and central sensitization. Viewed through the prism of ReTIAR, a new imaging technique can be used to diagnose adenomyosis more accurately and informatively and possibly help to choose the best treatment modality.

Nonsurgical management of adenomyosis: an overview of current evidence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Adenomyosis is a condition where endometrium-like tissue spreads within the myometrium. Although its prevalence in the general population is not exactly known, its clinical manifestations are well established and include pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea (painful periods), heavy menstrual bleeding and subfertility [1] . Adenomyosis often coexists with other gynaecological conditions, such as endometriosis or fibroids, and may cloud the clinical presentation [2] . The aim of this article is to review current noninterventional, nonsurgical management modalities and wherever possible offer information that allows women to make safe and informed choices regarding their treatment options.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies support that medical strategies, including the Mirena coil, Dienogest and GnRH antagonists, are efficient in improving adenomyosis-associated symptoms. High-quality evidence is scarce and is needed to properly counsel women with this condition. Future research should prioritize overall pain, menstrual bleeding, quality of life and live birth as primary outcomes and assess women with different grades of adenomyosis.

SUMMARY

This review provides the most current evidence with regards to the nonsurgical management of adenomyosis. In light of the paucity and low quality of existing data, high-quality trials are needed to definitely determine the impact of conservative and medical treatment on the clinical management of adenomyosis.

Ultrasound-guided microwave ablation for symptomatic adenomyosis: More areas of concern for more uniform and promising outcomes

Adenomyosis is a common gynecological disease in reproductive women, which causes serious dysmenorrhea, menorrhagia, anemia, and infertility, and has a serious impact on the physical and mental health of women. Considering that the efficacy of the traditional medication and surgical treatment is not ideal, an increasing number of patients are searching for more effective and less invasive therapies. Ultrasound (US)-guided microwave ablation (MWA) has emerged as a new effective and minimally invasive alternative treatment for symptomatic adenomyosis, and it is widely being used in clinical settings. Several studies have proven that it is an efficient and safe treatment modality for symptomatic adenomyosis, but a significant variance in clinical outcomes reported in previous studies was also observed. Herein, we have analyzed the potential causes of this problem from the aspects of the diagnosis of adenomyosis, symptom evaluation before ablation, steps of US-guided ablation treatment, and outcome evaluation after ablation. Simultaneously, the clinical problems existing in the ablation treatment of adenomyosis are discussed, and the directions of future research are pointed out.

Unveiling the Pathogenesis of Adenomyosis through Animal Models

Background: Adenomyosis is a common gynecological disorder traditionally viewed as “elusive”. Several excellent review papers have been published fairly recently on its pathogenesis, and several theories have been proposed. However, the falsifiability, explanatory power, and predictivity of these theories are often overlooked. Since adenomyosis can occur spontaneously in rodents and many other species, the animal models may help us unveil the pathogenesis of adenomyosis. This review critically tallies experimentally induced models published so far, with a particular focus on their relevance to epidemiological findings, their possible mechanisms of action, and their explanatory and predictive power. Methods: PubMed was exhaustively searched using the phrase “adenomyosis and animal model”, “adenomyosis and experimental model”, “adenomyosis and mouse”, and “adenomyosis and rat”, and the resultant papers were retrieved, carefully read, and the resultant information distilled. All the retrieved papers were then reviewed in a narrative manner. Results: Among all published animal models of adenomyosis, the mouse model of adenomyosis induced by endometrial–myometrial interface disruption (EMID) seems to satisfy the requirements of falsifiability and has the predictive capability and also Hill’s causality criteria. Other theories only partially satisfy Hill’s criteria of causality. In particular, animal models of adenomyosis induced by hyperestrogenism, hyperprolactinemia, or long-term exposure to progestogens without much epidemiological documentation and adenomyosis is usually not the exclusive uterine pathology consequent to those induction procedures. Regardless, uterine disruption appears to be a necessary but not sufficient condition for causing adenomyosis. Conclusions: EMID is, however, unlikely the sole cause for adenomyosis. Future studies, including animal studies, are warranted to understand how and why in utero and/or prenatal exposure to elevated levels of estrogen or estrogenic compounds increases the risk of developing adenomyosis in adulthood, to elucidate whether prolactin plays any role in its pathogenesis, and to identify sufficient condition(s) that cause adenomyosis.

Uterine Adenomyosis Treated by Linzagolix, an Oral Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor Antagonist: A Pilot Study with a New 'Hit Hard First and then Maintain' Regimen of Administration

(1) Background: The aim of the present pilot study was to study the effect of a new oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist on adenomyosis. (2) Methods: Eight premenopausal women, aged between 37 and 45 years, presenting with heavy menstrual bleeding, pelvic pain, and dysmenorrhea due to diffuse and disseminated uterine adenomyosis, confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), received 200 mg linzagolix once daily for a period of 12 weeks, after which they were switched to 100 mg linzagolix once daily for another 12 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in volume of the adenomyotic uterus from baseline to 24 weeks, evaluated by MRI. Secondary efficacy endpoints included the change in uterine volume from baseline to 12 and 36 weeks by MRI, and also weeks 12, 24, and 36 assessed by transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS). Other endpoints were overall pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, non-menstrual pelvic pain, dyspareunia, amenorrhea, quality of life measures, bone mineral density (BMD), junctional zone thickness, and serum estradiol values. (3) Results: Median serum estradiol was suppressed below 20 pg/mL during the 12 weeks on linzagolix 200 mg, and maintained below 60 pg/mL during the second 12 weeks on linzagolix 100 mg. At baseline, the mean ± SD uterine volume was 333 ± 250 cm³. After 24 weeks of treatment, it was 204 ± 126 cm³, a reduction of 32% (p = 0.0057). After 12 weeks, the mean uterine volume was 159 ± 95 cm³, a reduction of 55% from baseline (p = 0.0001). A similar pattern was observed when uterine volume was assessed by TVUS. Improvements in overall pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, non-menstrual pelvic pain, dyspareunia, and dyschezia, as well as quality of life measured using the EHP-30 were also observed. Mean percentage BMD loss at 24 weeks was, respectively, -2.4%, -1.3%, and -4.1% for the spine, femoral neck, and total hip. The most common adverse events were hot flushes, which occurred in 6/8 women during the first 12 weeks, and 1/8 women between 12 and 24 weeks. (4) Conclusions: Linzagolix at a dose of 200 mg/day reduced uterine volume, and improved clinically relevant symptoms. Treatment with 100 mg thereafter retains the therapeutic benefits of the starting dose while minimizing side effects. This 'hit hard first and then maintain' approach may be the optimal way to treat women with symptomatic adenomyosis.

Mode Switch of Ca2 + Oscillation-Mediated Uterine Peristalsis and Associated Embryo Implantation Impairments in Mouse Adenomyosis

Adenomyosis is a debilitating gynecological disease of the uterus with no medicinal cure. The tissue injury and repair hypothesis for adenomyosis suggests that uterine hyperperistalsis or dysperistalsis plays a pivotal role in establishing adenomyotic lesions. However, specific impairments in uterine peristalsis and the underlying cellular signals for these changes in adenomyosis remain elusive. Here, we report a precision-cut uterine slice preparation that preserves in vivo uterine architecture and generates peristalsis similar to that seen in the whole uterus. We found that uterine peristalsis in neonatal mice at day 14 and adult mice at day 55 presents as bursts with multiple peaks induced by intracellular Ca²⁺ oscillations. Using a mouse model of adenomyosis induced by tamoxifen, a selective estrogen receptor modulator, we discovered that uterine peristalsis and Ca²⁺ oscillations from adenomyotic uteri on days 14 and 55 become spikes (single peaks) with smaller amplitudes. The peak frequency of Ca²⁺ oscillations or peristalsis does not show a difference between control and adenomyotic mice. However, both the estimated force generated by uterine peristalsis and the total Ca²⁺ raised by Ca²⁺ oscillations are smaller in uteri from adenomyotic mice. Uteri from adenomyotic mice on day 14, but not on day 55, exhibit hyperresponsiveness to oxytocin. Embryo implantations are decreased in adenomyotic adult mice. Our results reveal a mode switch from bursts to spikes (rather than an increased peak frequency) of uterine Ca²⁺ oscillations and peristalsis and concurrent hyperresponsiveness to oxytocin in the neonatal stage are two characteristics of adenomyosis. These characteristics may contribute to embryo implantation impairments and decreased fertility in adenomyosis.

Treatment of symptomatic uterine adenomyosis with linzagolix, an oral gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist: a pilot study

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does a once-daily regimen of linzagolix, a new oral gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist, given at a fully suppressive dose (200 mg) for 12 weeks, followed by a partially suppressive dose (100 mg) for a further 12 weeks, reduce adenomyotic uterine size and associated symptoms?

DESIGN

Eight women (aged 37-45 years) with adenomyosis confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were enrolled in a single-centre, open-label pilot study. The primary efficacy end-point was the change in uterine volume on MRI at 24 weeks. Secondary efficacy end-points included serum oestradiol, overall pelvic pain, dysmenorrhoea, non-menstrual pelvic pain, dyspareunia, dyschezia and quality of life (QoL). Bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed at baseline and 24 weeks.

RESULTS

At baseline, uterine volume (mean ± SD) was 333 ± 250 cm³. After 24 weeks, it was 204 ± 126 cm³, a reduction of 32% from baseline (P = 0.0057). After 12 weeks, it was 159 ± 95 cm³, a reduction of 55% (P < 0.0001). Median serum oestradiol was suppressed below 20 pg/ml during the 12 weeks on 200 mg linzagolix, and maintained below 60 pg/ml on 100 mg linzagolix. Improvements in overall pelvic pain, dysmenorrhoea, non-menstrual pelvic pain, dyspareunia, dyschezia and QoL were observed. Mean percentage change in BMD loss at 24 weeks was -2.4%, -1.3% and -4.1% for the spine, femoral neck and total hip, respectively. The most common adverse events were hot flushes.

CONCLUSIONS

A once-daily regimen of 200 mg linzagolix for 12 weeks and then 100 mg for another 12 weeks decreased adenomyotic uterine volume and improved associated symptoms.

Uterine Adenomyosis: From Disease Pathogenesis to a New Medical Approach Using GnRH Antagonists

Uterine adenomyosis is a common chronic disorder frequently encountered in reproductive-age women, causing heavy menstrual bleeding, intense pelvic pain, and infertility. Despite its high prevalence, its etiopathogenesis is not yet fully understood, so there are currently no specific drugs to treat the disease. A number of dysregulated mechanisms are believed to contribute to adenomyosis development and symptoms, including sex steroid signaling, endometrial proliferation and invasiveness, and aberrant immune response. Abnormal sex steroid signaling, particularly hyperestrogenism and subsequent progesterone resistance, are known to play a pivotal role in its pathogenesis, which is why various antiestrogenic agents have been used to manage adenomyosis-related symptoms. Among them, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists are swiftly gaining ground, with recent studies reporting efficient lesion regression and symptom alleviation. The aim of the present review is to compile available information on the pathogenesis of adenomyosis, explore the etiology and mechanisms of hyperestrogenism, and discuss the potential of antiestrogenic therapies for treating the disease and improving patient quality of life.

Proposal for developing treatment algorithms of women with symptomatic adenomyosis: A single-center experience

AIMS

The most common symptoms of adenomyosis include heavy menstrual bleeding and dysmenorrhea. A variety of medical or surgical techniques are utilized for the treatment of adenomyosis, but there are currently no specific treatment guidelines and best practice recommendations for management. The aim of this study is to summarize current treatment strategies for women with symptomatic adenomyosis in a single-center university hospital in order to provide reliable information for developing treatment algorithms.

METHODS

We conducted an observational cross-sectional study using data from the adenomyosis cohort study from January 2008 to December 2020. Detailed information, including demographic, clinicopathological, and imaging data, were collected from 220 pathologically confirmed patients with adenomyosis.

RESULTS

First, we identified clinical and imaging characteristics in women who underwent surgery or hormone therapy, especially dienogest (DNG) treatment, as first-line treatment. Surgery was generally recommended for multiparous women over the age of 43, especially for patients with intrinsic adenomyosis. Next, we identified the parameters that allowed the continuation of DNG treatment. Oral DNG was given to certain patients with a myometrium thickness of 35 mm or greater and coexisting with endometriosis and/or uterine fibroids. To prevent serious bleeding, DNG treatment can be limited to women with extrinsic adenomyosis with a uterine length of 125 mm or less.

DISCUSSION

Our findings may provide useful information in developing an evidence-based treatment guideline for patients with symptomatic adenomyosis, nevertheless, further investigation is needed for the validation of treatment algorithms.

Study of dienogest clinical efficacy in the treatment of adenomyosis

Background:

A number of works provide information on the effectiveness of dienogest in uterine adenomyosis. However, information on the use of the drug at various degrees of the adenomatous nodes, is not presented in the available literature.

Aim:

The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of dienogest in the treatment of patients with adenomyosis 2nd and 3rd stage and chronic pelvic pain.

Materials and methods:

A comprehensive clinical survey and treatment of 46 patients with signs of adenomyosis were carried out. Patients were divided into two groups: 28 patients with stage 2 adenomyosis, 18 patients with type 3 adenomyosis were included in the 2nd group. On the first phase of the menstrual cycle all patients underwent hysteroscopy for endoscopic verification of the diagnosis using the traditional Karl Storz hysteroscopic stand with separate treatment and diagnostic curettage of the uterine cavity and cervical canal, followed by histological examination. After surgical treatment all patients received dienogest at a dose 2 mg/day for 6 months. The treatment was performed during 6 months. After 3, 6, and 12 months of the study, the patients included in the survey underwent a comprehensive examination with a clinical assessment of the manifestations of the disease. The level of pain manifestations was evaluated on a visual analog scale (VAS) with a range of 0–10 points. During pain assessment, its manifestations were differentiated—pain due to dyspareunia, dysmenorrhea, dyschezia, and chronic pelvic pain were evaluated.

Results:

In the group of patients with 2nd adenomyosis stage, the intake of dienogest for 6 months led to the absence of manifestations of uterine bleeding and dyschezia, a decrease in the frequency of dyspareunia—by 7.7 times. In patients with the 3rd stage of the disease, the decrease in the symptoms of adenomyosis was less pronounced, however, after taking the drug, a decrease in the frequency of uterine bleeding was found to be 6 times, dyspareunia 4 times, and dyschezia 5 times. Twelve months after the start of observation (6 months after the end of treatment), none of the patients with 2nd stage of disease showed severe pelvic pain, in the group with 3rd stage of adenomyosis there were only two of these patients (11.1%). At the same time, the vast majority of patients included in the study did not have manifestations of chronic pelvic pain—78.6% of patients with 2nd stage of adenomyosis and 55.6% of patients with 3rd stage of disease, the remaining 21.4% and 33.3% of patients of the first and second groups reported a significant decrease in the severity of pain.

Conclusions:

The inclusion of dienogest in the combined treatment of adenomyosis is clinically effective, contributing to the rapid and reliable relief of the main manifestations of the disease in patients with adenomyosis with grade 2 and 3 nodes. Treatment of adenomyosis with the use of dienogest is clinically effective, contributing to the rapid and reliable relief of the main manifestation of the disease.