1
|
Ioannou E, Humphreys H, Homer C, Purvis A. Beyond the individual: Socio-ecological factors impacting activity after gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med 2024; 41:e15286. [PMID: 38291570 DOI: 10.1111/dme.15286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
AIM The risk of Type 2 Diabetes is 10 times higher after a pregnancy with Gestational Diabetes. Physical activity can independently reduce this risk, yet engagement with physical activity remains low after Gestational Diabetes. Therefore, the present study aimed to explore the barriers and facilitators to the uptake of physical activity after Gestational Diabetes in the United Kingdom, using a socio-ecological approach. METHODS The paper was written following the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research. Patient and Public Involvement contributed to the study's conceptualisation and design. Participants were recruited through an audit of Gestational Diabetes cases at a local Teaching Hospital in 2020. Twelve participants took part in semi-structured one-to-one interviews. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to generate themes in iterative rounds of refinement. The final themes were then organised using the socio-ecological model. RESULTS Participants were all over 31 years old, predominantly self-identified as White British and were all in employment but were evenly spread across UK-based deprivation deciles. Ten themes were generated and organised according to the four levels of the socio-ecological model: intrapersonal (beliefs about activity, recovering from birth), social (health care professionals, family and partner, role as a mother), organisational (access and cost, environment, childcare and work) and community (connecting women with recent Gestational Diabetes). CONCLUSIONS Many of the amenable barriers and facilitators to physical activity were beyond the intrapersonal level, based on higher levels of the socio-ecological model (social, organisational and community). Multi-level interventions are needed to effectively address all barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elysa Ioannou
- Sport and Physical Activity Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
| | - Helen Humphreys
- Centre for Behavioural Science and Applied Psychology (CeBSAP), Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
| | - Catherine Homer
- Sport and Physical Activity Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
| | - Alison Purvis
- Sport and Physical Activity Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
O'Reilly SL, McAuliffe FM, Geraghty AA, Burden C, Davies A. Implementing weight management during and after pregnancy to reduce diabetes and CVD risk in maternal and child populations. Proc Nutr Soc 2023:1-12. [PMID: 38037711 DOI: 10.1017/s0029665123004883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
Maintaining a healthy weight during pregnancy is critical for both women's and children's health. Excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) can lead to complications such as gestational diabetes, hypertension and caesarean delivery. Insufficient GWG can cause fetal growth restriction and increase infant mortality risk. Additionally, postpartum weight retention raises risk of obesity, type 2 diabetes and other chronic diseases for both mother and child. This review seeks to identify current obstacles in weight management research during and after pregnancy and explore evidence-based strategies to overcome them. Pregnancy offers a window of opportunity for health behaviour changes as women are more receptive to education and have regular contact with health services. Staying within Institute of Medicine's recommended GWG ranges is associated with better maternal and fetal outcomes. Systematic review evidence supports structured diet and physical activity pregnancy interventions, leading to reduced GWG and fewer complications. Health economic evaluation indicates significant returns from implementation, surpassing investment costs due to decreased perinatal morbidity and adverse events. However, the most effective way to implement interventions within routine antenatal care remains unclear. Challenges increase in the postpartum period due to competing demands on women physically, mentally and socially, hindering intervention reach and retention. Flexible, technology-supported interventions are needed, requiring frameworks such as penetration-implementation-participation-effectiveness and template-for-intervention-description-and-replication for successful implementation. Greater research efforts are necessary to inform practice and investigate fidelity aspects through pragmatic implementation trials during the pregnancy and postpartum periods. Understanding the best ways to deliver interventions will empower women to maintain a healthy weight during their reproductive years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharleen L O'Reilly
- School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin College of Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
- UCD Perinatal Research Centre, National Maternity Hospital, University College Dublin School of Medicine, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Fionnuala M McAuliffe
- UCD Perinatal Research Centre, National Maternity Hospital, University College Dublin School of Medicine, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Aisling A Geraghty
- School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin College of Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
- UCD Perinatal Research Centre, National Maternity Hospital, University College Dublin School of Medicine, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Christy Burden
- Academic Women's Health Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Anna Davies
- Academic Women's Health Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
O'Reilly SL, Laws R, Maindal HT, Teede H, Harrison C, McAuliffe FM, Geraghty A, Campoy C, Bermúdez MG, Pirhonen L, Burden C, Davies A, Laursen DH, Skinner T. A Complex mHealth Coaching Intervention to Prevent Overweight, Obesity, and Diabetes in High-Risk Women in Antenatal Care: Protocol for a Hybrid Type 2 Effectiveness-Implementation Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2023; 12:e51431. [PMID: 37721798 PMCID: PMC10546269 DOI: 10.2196/51431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women with overweight and obesity are at higher risk of developing complications in pregnancy such as gestational diabetes and longer-term chronic conditions. Research concerning health behavior change interventions during pregnancy and postpartum shows promising effects, but implementation into routine services is sparsely investigated. Most interventions focus on the antenatal or postpartum life stages, failing to meet the needs of women. IMPACT DIABETES Bump2Baby is a multicenter project across 4 high-income countries developed to test the implementation of an antenatal and postpartum evidence-based mobile health (mHealth) coaching intervention called Bump2Baby and Me (B2B&Me) designed to sit alongside usual care in the perinatal period. OBJECTIVE We aim to explore the feasibility and implementation of the B2B&Me intervention and investigate the effectiveness of this intervention in women at risk of gestational diabetes. METHODS IMPACT DIABETES Bump2Baby is a hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation study, which integrates an evidence-based mHealth coaching app that includes personalized health behavior change coaching provided by health care professionals alongside antenatal care from the first antenatal visit to 12 months postpartum. The mHealth app offers the possibility of synchronous calls, asynchronous contact (including coach-participant text and video messaging exchanges tailored to the participant's needs), and ongoing access to an extensive library of bespoke intervention materials. Participants will interact asynchronously with their health coach throughout the intervention via the app. This randomized controlled trial across 4 clinical sites within Ireland, the United Kingdom, Spain, and Australia will recruit 800 women in early pregnancy to evaluate the effectiveness on postpartum weight. The Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment implementation framework is the theoretical underpinning of the study. The implementation evaluation will be assessed at the individual, hospital staff, and broader community levels using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Data sources for the RE-AIM evaluation will include app and platform analytics, screening and training records, participant medical records, key informant interviews, participant and partner exit interviews, cost data, study questionnaires, staff surveys, and blood sample analyses. RESULTS The study was approved and registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry on November 19, 2020. Recruitment commenced on February 9, 2021, and data collection is ongoing. Publication of the results is expected in 2024. CONCLUSIONS This is the first hybrid effectiveness-implementation study of an 18-month mHealth coaching intervention in at-risk women that we are aware of. As research aims to move toward real-world implementable solutions, it is critical that hybrid studies are conducted. The data from this large multicenter study will be useful in planning the potential implementation and scale-up of evidence-based perinatal health behavior change interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12620001240932; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=380020&isReview=true. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/51431.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharleen L O'Reilly
- School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- University College Dublin Perinatal Research Centre, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Rachel Laws
- School of Exercise and Nutrition Science, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia
| | | | - Helena Teede
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Cheryce Harrison
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Fionnuala M McAuliffe
- University College Dublin Perinatal Research Centre, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Aisling Geraghty
- School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- University College Dublin Perinatal Research Centre, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Cristina Campoy
- Department of Paediatrics, School of Medicine, EURISTIKOS Excellence Centre for Paediatric Research, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria, Health Sciences Technological Park, Granada, Spain
| | - Mercedes G Bermúdez
- Department of Paediatrics, School of Medicine, EURISTIKOS Excellence Centre for Paediatric Research, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria, Health Sciences Technological Park, Granada, Spain
| | - Laura Pirhonen
- Institute of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christy Burden
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Anna Davies
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | | | - Timothy Skinner
- Institute of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Timm A, Kragelund Nielsen K, Alvesson HM, Jensen DM, Maindal HT. Motivation for Behavior Change among Women with Recent Gestational Diabetes and Their Partners-A Qualitative Investigation among Participants in the Face-It Intervention. Nutrients 2023; 15:3906. [PMID: 37764690 PMCID: PMC10535498 DOI: 10.3390/nu15183906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Revised: 08/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Promoting diet and physical activity is important for women with recent gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and their partners to reduce the risk of future type 2 diabetes (T2D). The study aimed to understand how motivation for changing diet and physical activity behaviors among women with recent GDM and their partners was experienced after participation in the Danish Face-it intervention. Fourteen couples' interviews were conducted. Data analysis followed a reflexive thematic analysis. Guided by self-determination theory and interdependence theory, we identified four themes affecting couples' motivation for health behavior change: (1) The need to feel understood after delivery; (2) adjusting health expectations; (3) individual and mutual preferences for health behaviors; and (4) the health threat of future T2D as a cue to action. We found that couples in general perceived the Face-it intervention as useful and motivating. Using couple interviews increased our understanding of how the women and partners influenced each other's perspectives after a GDM-affected pregnancy and thus how targeting couples as opposed to women alone may motivate health behavior change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Timm
- Health Promotion Research, Copenhagen University Hospital—Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, 2730 Herlev, Denmark; (K.K.N.); (H.T.M.)
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Karoline Kragelund Nielsen
- Health Promotion Research, Copenhagen University Hospital—Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, 2730 Herlev, Denmark; (K.K.N.); (H.T.M.)
| | | | - Dorte Møller Jensen
- Steno Diabetes Center Odense, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark;
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Helle Terkildsen Maindal
- Health Promotion Research, Copenhagen University Hospital—Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, 2730 Herlev, Denmark; (K.K.N.); (H.T.M.)
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|