Mobile Stroke Units: Current and Future Impact on Stroke Care

Costs and Benefits of the Melbourne Mobile Stroke Unit Compared With Standard Ambulance: Causal Analysis Using Observational Linked Data

BACKGROUND

Evidence of the cost implications and health outcomes associated with the use of mobile stroke units (MSU) is required to support their utilization. We aimed to evaluate the causal effect of the use of an MSU compared with a standard ambulance on hospitalization costs and 90- to 180-day health outcomes.

METHODS

Causal effect estimation was performed using patient-level data from a cohort of patients with stroke in 2018 identified from the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry (Victoria) and Melbourne MSU. These data were linked to Ambulance Victoria and government-held administrative data sets. In total, linked data from 8657 patients were available. Propensity score matching was used to define comparator groups within a target trial framework. Costs included emergency department and hospital admission costs in the first 180 days after stroke. Multivariable regression analyses of the matched data were used to compare costs and outcomes (mortality and modified Rankin Scale) between MSU and standard ambulance groups.

RESULTS

The target trial sample included 96 patients transported by the MSU (intervention) and 198 patients transported by standard ambulance services (control). Of these, the mean age was 76 years and 157 (53%) were men. A greater proportion of patients received mechanical thrombectomy in the intervention group than the control group (40% versus 23%; P<0.001). The adjusted hospital costs were $17 949 greater in the intervention group than the control group (95% CI, $4682-$31 214; P=0.01). Patients in intervention group doubled the odds of achieving nondisability (modified Rankin Scale scores of 0-1, adjusted odds ratio of 2.11 [95% CI, 1.07-4.18]) and halved the mortality rate (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.32-0.86]) within 90 to 180 days poststroke compared with the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

There are important cost implications and improved outcomes from using the MSU that are likely related to increased provision of reperfusion therapy.

Lifetime economic potential of mobile stroke units in acute stroke care: A model-based analysis of the drivers of cost-effectiveness

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To simulate patient-level costs, analyze the economic potential of telemedicine-based mobile stroke units for acute prehospital stroke care, and identify major determinants of cost-effectiveness, based on two recent prospective trials from the United States and Germany.

METHODS

A Markov decision model was developed to simulate lifetime costs and outcomes of mobile stroke unit. The model compares diagnostic and therapeutic pathways of ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, and stroke mimic patients by conventional care or by mobile stroke units. The treatment outcomes were derived from the B_PROUD and the BEST-mobile stroke unit trials and further input parameters were derived from recent literature. Uncertainty was addressed by deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. A lifetime horizon based on the US healthcare system was adopted to evaluate different cost thresholds for mobile stroke unit and the resulting cost-effectiveness. Willingness-to-pay thresholds were set at 1x and 3x gross domestic product per capita, as recommended by the World Health Organization.

RESULTS

In the base case scenario, mobile stroke unit care yielded an incremental gain of 0.591 quality-adjusted life years per dispatch. Mobile stroke unit was highly cost-effective up to a maximum average cost of 43,067 US dollars per patient. Sensitivity analyses revealed that MSU cost-effectiveness is mainly affected by reduction of long-term disability costs. Also, among other parameters, the rate of stroke mimics patients diagnosed by MSU plays an important role.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that mobile stroke unit can possibly be operated on an excellent level of cost-effectiveness in urban areas in North America with number of stroke mimic patients and long-term stroke survivor costs as major determinants of lifetime cost-effectiveness.

Establishing an MSU service in a medium-sized German urban area-clinical and economic considerations

Background and purpose

Mobile stroke units (MSU) have been demonstrated to improve prehospital stroke care in metropolitan and rural regions. Due to geographical, social and structural idiosyncrasies of the German city of Mannheim, concepts of established MSU services are not directly applicable to the Mannheim initiative. The aim of the present analysis was to identify major determinants that need to be considered when initially setting up a local MSU service.

Methods

Local stroke statistics from 2015 to 2021 were analyzed and circadian distribution of strokes and local incidence rates were calculated. MSU patient numbers and total program costs were estimated for varying operating modes, daytime coverage models, staffing configurations which included several resource sharing models with the hospital. Additional case-number simulations for expanded catchment areas were performed.

Results

Median time of symptom onset of ischemic stroke patients was 1:00 p.m. 54.3% of all stroke patients were admitted during a 10-h time window on weekdays. Assuming that MSU is able to reach 53% of stroke patients, the average expected number of ischemic stroke patients admitted to MSU would be 0.64 in a 10-h shift each day, which could potentially be increased by expanding the MSU catchment area. Total estimated MSU costs amounted to € 815,087 per annum. Teleneurological assessment reduced overall costs by 11.7%.

Conclusion

This analysis provides a framework of determinants and considerations to be addressed during the design process of a novel MSU program in order to balance stroke care improvements with the sustainable use of scarce resources.

Hemorrhage Enlargement Is More Frequent in the First 2 Hours: A Prehospital Mobile Stroke Unit Study

Background:

Hematoma enlargement (HE) after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a therapeutic target for improving outcomes. Hemostatic therapies to prevent HE may be more effective the earlier they are attempted. An understanding of HE in first 1 to 2 hours specifically in the prehospital setting would help guide future treatment interventions in this time frame and setting.

Methods:

Patients with spontaneous ICH within 4 hours of symptom onset were prospectively evaluated between May 2014 and April 2020 as a prespecified substudy within a multicenter trial of prehospital mobile stroke unit versus standard management. Baseline computed tomography scans obtained <1, 1 to 2, and 2 to 4 hours postsymptom onset on the mobile stroke unit in the prehospital setting were compared with computed tomography scans repeated 1 hour later and at 24 hours in the hospital. HE was defined as >6 mL if baseline ICH volume was < 20 mL and 33% increase if baseline volume >20 mL. The association between time from symptom onset to baseline computed tomography (hours) and HE was investigated using Wilcoxon rank-sum test when time was treated as a continuous variable and using Fisher exact test when time was categorized. Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests evaluated differences in baseline volumes and HE. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with HE and variable selection was performed using cross-validated L1-regularized (Lasso regression). This study adhered to STROBE guidelines (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) for cohort studies.

Results:

One hundred thirty-nine patients were included. There was no difference between baseline ICH volumes obtained <1 hour (n=43) versus 1 to 2 hour (n=51) versus >2 hours (n=45) from symptom onset (median [interquartile range], 13 mL [6–24] versus 14 mL [6–30] versus 12 mL [4–19]; P =0.65). However, within the same 3 time epochs, initial hematoma growth (volume/time from onset) was greater with earlier baseline scanning (median [interquartile range], 17 mL/hour [9–35] versus 9 mL/hour [5–23]) versus 4 mL/hour [2–7]; P <0.001). Forty-nine patients had repeat scans 1 hour after baseline imaging (median, 2.3 hours [interquartile range. 1.9–3.1] after symptom onset). Eight patients (16%) had HE during that 1-hour interval; all of these occurred in patients with baseline imaging within 2 hours of onset (5/18=28% with baseline imaging within 1 hour, 3/18=17% within 1–2 hour, 0/13=0% >2 hours; P =0.02). HE did not occur between the scans repeated at 1 hour and 24 hours. No association between baseline variables and HE was detected in multivariable analyses.

Conclusions:

HE in the next hour occurs in 28% of ICH patients with baseline imaging within the first hour after symptom onset, and in 17% of those with baseline imaging between 1 and 2 hours. These patients would be a target for ultraearly hemostatic intervention.

Mobile Stroke Units: Current Evidence and Impact

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Several approaches have been developed to optimize prehospital systems for acute stroke given poor access and significant delays to timely treatment. Specially equipped ambulances that directly initiate treatment, known as Mobile Stroke Units (MSUs), have rapidly proliferated across the world. This review provides a comprehensive summary on the efficacy of MSUs in acute stroke, its various applications beyond thrombolysis, as well as the establishment, optimal setting and cost-effectiveness of incorporating an MSU into healthcare systems.

RECENT FINDINGS

MSUs speed stroke treatment into the first "golden hour" when better outcomes from thrombolysis are achieved. While evidence for the positive impact of MSUs on outcomes was previously unavailable, two recent landmark controlled trials, B_PROUD and BEST-MSU, show that MSUs result in significantly lesser disability compared to conventional ambulance care. Emerging literature prove the significant impact of MSUs. Adaptability however remains limited by significant upfront financial investment, challenges with reimbursements and pending evidence on their cost-effectiveness.

Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke Detection in the Prehospital Environment

Purpose of Review

Endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke secondary to large vessel occlusion (LVO) is time-dependent. Prehospital patients with suspected LVO stroke should be triaged directly to specialized stroke centers for endovascular therapy. This review describes advances in LVO detection among prehospital suspected stroke patients.

Recent Findings

Clinical prehospital stroke severity tools have been validated in the prehospital setting. Devices including EEG, SSEPs, TCD, cranial accelerometry, and volumetric impedance phase-shift-spectroscopy have recently published data regarding LVO detection in hospital settings. Mobile stroke units bring thrombolysis and vessel imaging to patients.

Summary

The use of a prehospital stroke severity tool for LVO triage is now widely supported. Ease of use should be prioritized as there are no meaningful differences in diagnostic performance amongst tools. LVO diagnostic devices are promising, but none have been validated in the prehospital setting. Mobile stroke units improve patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness analyses are underway.

Use of Portable Imaging Modalities in Patients With Neurologic Disorders: A Case-Based Discussion

Imaging technologies have significantly improved over the past few decades and play a critical role in the diagnosis and management of patients with neurologic conditions. With the evolution of these technologies to portable versions, significant implications exist for current neurologic care as well as potential improvements for the future. This article serves to describe portable imaging technologies and their potential impact on the field of neurology highlighted through the case of a patient who presented with symptoms consistent with a stroke.