Comparing Simultaneous Electrocochleography and Auditory Brainstem Response Measurements Using Three Different Extratympanic Electrodes

High-Resolution EEG Amplifiers Are Feasible for Electrocochleography Without Time Restriction

OBJECTIVES

The gold standard for electrocochleography (ECochG) is using dedicated recording devices for auditory evoked potentials. However, these have a very limited time window for recording. The aim of this study is to evaluate EEG amplifiers for ECochG, in particular for recording cochlear microphonics (CMs) without time restriction.

METHODS

Three high-resolution EEG amplifiers and different types of electrodes were analyzed and compared with a clinical system for recording auditory evoked potentials. For this, CMs were recorded after stimulation with various stimuli in a dummy and in human subjects. In the latter, recordings were made from the tympanic membrane and, during otosurgical procedures, from the promontory. Our evaluation focused on comparing signal amplifiers and electrode types, considering the signal-to-noise ratio, recording characteristics, and measurement reliability.

RESULTS

Using a dummy model, we observed significant differences among devices, electrode types, and stimulus frequencies. These findings were subsequently confirmed in human participant measurements. Nevertheless, EEG amplifiers proved to be feasible for ECochG recordings and offered a recording fidelity comparable to proprietary clinical methods. Importantly, with EEG amplifiers, we were able to record cochlear potentials in response to speech stimuli, revealing a strong correlation (r = 0.78) between recorded signals and the input stimulus.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that high resolution EEG amplifiers are suitable for recording cochlear potentials, in particular, CMs. This allows for evaluating cochlear signals in response to extended stimuli, in particular, speech stimuli.

Effects of Tympanic Membrane Electrodes on Sound Transmission From the Ear Canal to the Middle and Inner Ears

OBJECTIVES

The first objective of the study was to compare approaches to eardrum electrode insertion as they relate to the likelihood of introducing an acoustic leak between the ear canal and eartip. A common method for placing a tympanic membrane electrode involves securing the electrode in the canal by routing it underneath a foam eartip. This method is hypothesized to result in a slit leak between the canal and foam tip due to the added bulk of the electrode wire. An alternative approach involves creating a bore in the wall of the foam tip that the electrode can be threaded through. This method is hypothesized to reduce the likelihood of a slit leak before the electrode wire is integrated into the foam tip. The second objective of the study was to investigate how sound transmission in the ear is affected by placing an electrode on the eardrum. It was hypothesized that an electrode in contact with the eardrum increases the eardrum's mass, with the potential to reduce sound transmission at high frequencies.

DESIGN

Wideband acoustic immittance and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) were measured in eight human ears. Measurements were completed for five different conditions: (1) baseline with no electrode in the canal, (2) dry electrode in the canal but not touching the eardrum, secured underneath the eartip, (3) dry electrode in the canal not touching the eardrum, secured through a bore in the eartip (subsequent conditions were completed using this method), (4) hydrated electrode in the canal but not touching the eardrum, and (5) hydrated electrode touching the eardrum. To create the bore, a technique was developed in which a needle is heated and pushed through the foam eartip. The electrode is then thread through the bore and advanced slowly by hand until contacting the eardrum. Analysis included comparing absorbance, admittance phase angle, and DPOAE levels between measurement conditions.

RESULTS

Comparison of the absorbance and admittance phase angle measurements between the electrode placement methods revealed significantly higher absorbance and lower admittance phase angle from 0.125 to 1 kHz when the electrode is routed under the eartip. Absorbance and admittance phase angle were minimally affected when the electrode was inserted through a bore in the eartip. DPOAE levels across the different conditions showed changes approximating test-retest variability. Upon contacting the eardrum, the absorbance tended to decrease below 1 kHz and increase above 1 kHz. However, changes were within the range of test-retest variability. There was evidence of reduced levels below 1 kHz and increased levels above 1 kHz upon the electrode contacting the eardrum. However, differences between conditions approximated test-retest variability.

CONCLUSIONS

Routing the eardrum electrode through the foam tip reduces the likelihood of incurring an acoustic leak between the canal walls and eartip, compared with routing the electrode under the eartip. Changes in absorbance and DPOAE levels resulting from electrode contact with the eardrum implicate potential stiffening of eardrum; however, the magnitude of changes suggests minimal effect of the electrode on sound transmission in the ear.

Exploring Electrode Placements to Optimize the Identification and Measurement of Early Auditory Evoked Potentials

Cochlear synaptic loss (termed cochlear synaptopathy) has been suggested to contribute to suprathreshold hearing difficulties. However, its existence and putative effects in humans remain inconclusive, largely due to the heterogeneous methods used across studies to indirectly evaluate the health of cochlear synapses. There is a need to standardize proxies of cochlear synaptopathy to appropriately compare and interpret findings across studies. Early auditory evoked potentials (AEPs), including the compound action potential (AP)/Wave I of the auditory brainstem response are a popular proxy, yet remain variable based on technical considerations. This study evaluated one such consideration-electrode array (i.e., montage)-to optimize the use of early AEP waveforms. In 35 young adults, electrocochleography (ECochG) responses were collected using vertical and horizontal montages. Standard ECochG measures and AP/Wave I and Wave II peak-to-trough amplitudes and latencies were compared between montages. Vertical montage recordings consistently produced significantly larger AP/Wave I peak-to-trough amplitudes compared to horizontal recordings. These findings support the use of a vertical electrode montage for optimal recordings of peripheral cochlear nerve activity. As cochlear synaptopathy continues to be explored in humans, the methods highlighted here should be considered in the development of a standardized assessment.

Examining the Profile of Noise-Induced Cochlear Synaptopathy Using iPhone Health App Data and Cochlear and Brainstem Electrophysiological Responses to Fast Clicks Rates

Little is known about objective classifying of noise exposure risk levels in personal listening device (PLD) users and electrophysiologic evidence of cochlear synaptopathy at very fast click rates. The aim of the study was to objectively classify noise exposure risk using iPhone Health app and identify signs of cochlear synaptopathy using behavioral and electrophysiologic measures. Thirty normal-hearing females (aged 18-26 years) were grouped based on their iPhone Health app's 6-month listening level and noise exposure data into low-risk and high-risk groups. They were assessed using a questionnaire, extended high-frequency (EHF) audiometry, QuickSIN test, distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE), and simultaneous recording of electrocochleography (ECochG) and auditory brainstem response (ABR) at three click rates (19.5/s, 97.7/s, 234.4/s). A series of ANOVAs and independent samples t -test were conducted for group comparison. Both groups had within-normal EHF hearing thresholds and DPOAEs. However, the high-risk participants were over twice as likely to suffer from tinnitus, had abnormally large summating potential to action potential amplitude and area ratios at fast rates, and had slightly smaller waves I and V amplitudes. The high-risk group demonstrated a profile of behavioral and objective signs of cochlear synaptopathy based on ECochG and ABR recordings at fast click rates. The findings in this study suggest that the iPhone Health app may be a useful tool for further investigation into cochlear synaptopathy in PLD users.

No effect of occupational noise exposure on auditory brainstem response and speech perception in noise

The primary aim of this study was to investigate whether auditory brainstem response (ABR) and speech perception in noise (SPiN) were associated with occupational noise exposure in normal hearing young factory workers. Forty young adults occupationally exposed to noise and 40 non-exposed young adults (control group) from Zhejiang province in China were selected. All participants presented with normal hearing thresholds and distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Participants were evaluated with the Mandarin Bamford-Kowal-Bench (BKB) test and ABR. The latter was obtained for click stimulus at 50, 60, 70, 80, and 90 dBnHL. Peak-to-trough amplitudes and latencies for waves I and V were obtained. The ABR wave I amplitude, the wave I/V amplitude ratio, the slope of the wave I amplitude growth as a function of stimulus intensity (AMP-I_Slope), and the wave V latency shift with ipsilateral noise (LAT-V_Slope) were used as ABR outcomes. Finally, equivalent continuous average sound pressure level normalized to 8 h (L_Aeq.8h) and cumulative noise exposure (CNE) were obtained for noise-exposed participants. No significant differences between groups were found for any ABR outcomes. Noise-exposed participants exhibited worse BKB scores than control group participants. A multivariate regression model showed that 23.3% of the variance in BKB scores was explained by group category (exposed vs. non-exposed) and hearing thresholds. However, since none of the ABR outcomes exploring cochlear synaptopathy were associated with noise exposure, we cannot conclude that cochlear synaptopathy was the contributing factor for the differences between groups for BKB scores. Factors that go beyond sensory processing may explain such results, especially given socio-economic differences between the noise-exposed and control groups. We conclude that in this sample of participants, occupational noise exposure was not associated with signs of cochlear synaptopathy as measured by ABR and BKB.