LI-RADS-CEUS - Proposal for a Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Algorithm for the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in High-Risk Populations

Assessment of arterial-phase hyperenhancement and late-phase washout of hepatocellular carcinoma-a meta-analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with SonoVue® and Sonazoid®

OBJECTIVES

The recognition of arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) and washout during the late phase is key for correct diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). This meta-analysis was conducted to compare SonoVue®-enhanced and Sonazoid®-enhanced ultrasound in the assessment of HCC enhancement and diagnosis.

METHODS

Studies were included in the analysis if they reported data for HCC enhancement in the arterial phase and late phase for SonoVue® or in the arterial phase and Kupffer phase (KP) for Sonazoid®. Forty-two studies (7502 patients) with use of SonoVue® and 30 studies (2391 patients) with use of Sonazoid® were identified. In a pooled analysis, the comparison between SonoVue® and Sonazoid® CEUS was performed using chi-square test. An inverse variance weighted random-effect model was used to estimate proportion, sensitivity, and specificity along with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

In the meta-analysis, the proportion of HCC showing APHE with SonoVue®, 93% (95% CI 91-95%), was significantly higher than the proportion of HCC showing APHE with Sonazoid®, 77% (71-83%) (p < 0.0001); similarly, the proportion of HCC showing washout at late phase/KP was significantly higher with SonoVue®, 86% (83-89%), than with Sonazoid®, 76% (70-82%) (p < 0.0001). The sensitivity and specificity for the detection of APHE plus late-phase/KP washout detection in HCC were also higher with SonoVue® than with Sonazoid® (sensitivity 80% vs 52%; specificity 80% vs 73% in studies within unselected patient populations).

CONCLUSION

APHE and late washout in HCC are more frequently observed with SonoVue® than with Sonazoid®. This may affect the diagnostic performance of CEUS in the diagnosis of HCCs.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Meta-analysis data show the presence of key enhancement features for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma is different between ultrasound contrast agents, and arterial hyperenhancement and late washout are more frequently observed at contrast-enhanced ultrasound with SonoVue® than with Sonazoid®.

KEY POINTS

• Dynamic enhancement features are key for imaging-based diagnosis of HCC. • Arterial hyperenhancement and late washout are more often observed in HCCs using SonoVue®-enhanced US than with Sonazoid®. • The existing evidence for contrast-enhanced US may need to be considered being specific to the individual contrast agent.

Intra-individual comparison of Sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultrasound and SonoVue contrast-enhanced ultrasound in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

To assess whether the diagnostic performance of Sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultrasound (SZUS) is non-inferior to that of SonoVue contrast-enhanced ultrasound (SVUS) in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in individuals with high risk.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study was conducted from October 2020 to May 2022 and included participants with a high risk of HCC who underwent SZUS and SVUS. All lesions were confirmed by clinical or pathological diagnosis. Each nodule was classified according to the Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2017 (CEUS LI-RADS v2017) for SVUS and SZUS and the modified CEUS LI-RADS (using Kupffer phase defect instead of late and mild washout) for SZUS. The diagnostic performance of both two modalities for all observations was compared. Analysis of the vascular phase and Kupffer phase imaging characteristics of CEUS was performed.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifteen focal liver lesions from 113 patients (94 HCCs, 12 non-HCC malignancies, and 9 benign lesions) were analysed. According to CEUS LI-RADS (v2017), SVUS and SZUS showed similar sensitivity (71.3% vs. 72.3%) and specificity (85.7% vs. 81.0%) in HCC diagnosis. However, the modified CEUS LI-RADS did not significantly improve the diagnostic efficacy of Sonazoid compared to CEUS LI-RADS v2017, having equivalent sensitivity (73.4% vs. 72.3%) and specificity (81.0% vs. 81.0%). The agreement between SVUS and SZUS for all observations was 0.610 (95% CI 0.475, 0.745), while for HCCs it was 0.452 (95% CI 0.257, 0.647).

CONCLUSION

Using LI-RADS v2017, SZUS and SVUS showed non-inferior efficacy in evaluating HCC lesions. In addition, adding Kupffer phase defects to SZUS does not notably improve its diagnostic efficacy.

The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with microflow imaging in predicting microvascular invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma before operation

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the preoperative predictive value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) combined with microflow imaging (MFI) in microvascular invasion (MVI) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

In our study, 80 patients with HCC were analyzed retrospectively. According to the gold standard of postoperative pathology, the patients were divided into MVI positive group (n = 39) and MVI negative group (n = 41). we were to analyze the correlation between CEUS and MVI in combination with MFI, to identify independent risk factors for the occurrence of MVI positive, and to analyze the predictive efficacy of every independent risk factor and their combination in preoperative prediction of MVI.

RESULTS

In our study, 80 patients were enrolled, including 39 patients in the MVI-positive group and 41 patients in the MVI-negative group, with a MVI-positive rate of 48.8%. By univariate analysis and multivariate analysis, it was found that there were statistically significant differences in enhancement range extension, start time of wash out and CEUS-MFI between the two groups, which were independent risk factors for MVI-positive. The combination of three independent risk factors is more effective than single one in predicting MVI of HCC.

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS combined with MFI is feasible for the preoperative prediction of MVI in HCC, and can provides meaningful help for individualized clinical treatment.

[Ultrasound systems for abdominal diagnostics - current methods, clinical applications and new technologies]

Abdominal ultrasound is the method of first choice in many clinical situations. Gray scale imaging (B-mode) and conventional Doppler techniques are nowadays complemented by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), elastography, fat quantification and further technologies which allow multimodal characterization of organs and tissue structure using panoramic imaging, 3D-techniques and image fusion. The development of small portable devices augments the spectrum for sonographic diagnostics. In this review, we describe the current status of ultrasound technology based on published evidence. In addition, we provide guidance for quality assurance.

Combining serum AFP and CEUS LI-RADS for better diagnostic performance in Chinese high-risk patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of revised contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version by combining LR-M category and serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) under different cut-off values.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 152 high-risk patients with 152 histology-proven nodules. For revised LI-RADS, nodules in LR-M with different elevated AFP thresholds have been reclassified as the LR-5 category. The diagnostic performances of original and revised CEUS LI-RADS were evaluated and compared.

RESULTS

To compare with the original version, the sensitivity of revised LR-5 (adjusted with AFP value > 200 ng/ml or 400 ng/ml) for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) improved from 52.5 to 69.2% or 65.0%, respectively (both p < 0.001) without compromising specificity (87.5% vs. 71.9% or 78.1%, respectively, both p > 0.05). For the diagnosis of non-HCC malignancy, the specificity of the LR-M after reclassification was improved (69.6% vs. 84.4% or 80.7%, respectively, both p < 0.001) with a non-significant sensitivity reduction (100.0 vs. 70.6% or 82.4%, respectively, both p > 0.05). After modification, the sensitivity of LR-5 also increased to 69.1% or 64.9% (both p < 0.001), while the specificity and PPV did not change (both p > 0.05) for larger nodules (> 20 mm).

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic performance of CEUS LI-RADS can be further improved by reclassifying LR-M nodules with elevated AFP thresholds to LR-5.

Identification of the origin of tumor in vein: comparison between CEUS LI-RADS v2017 and v2016 for patients at high risk

Objectives

To compare the diagnostic performance of the Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Report and Data System (LI-RADS) v2016 and v2017 in identifying the origin of tumor in vein (TIV).

Methods

From April 2014 to December 2018, focal liver lesions (FLLs) accompanied by TIV formation in patients at high risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were enrolled. Histologic evaluation or composite imaging reference standard were served as the reference standard. Each case was categorized according to the CEUS LI-RADS v2016 and v2017, respectively. Diagnostic performance of CEUS LI-RADS v2016 and v2017 in identifying the originated tumor of TIV was validated via sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value.

Results

A total of 273 FLLs with TIV were analyzed finally, including 266 HCCs and 7 non-HCCs. In v2016, when adopting all TIV as LR-5V, the accuracy and PPV in identifying the originated tumor were both 97.4%. In v2017, when assigning TIV according to contiguous FLLs CEUS LI-RADS category, the accuracy and PPV were 61.9% and 99.4% in subclass of LR-5 as the diagnostic criteria of HCC, and 64.1% and 99.4% in subclass of LR-4/5 as the criteria of HCC diagnosis. There were significant differences in diagnostic accuracy between CEUS LI-RADS v2016 and v2017 in identifying the originated tumor of TIV (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

CEUS LI-RADS v2016 could be better than v2017 in identifying the originated tumor of TIV.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12880-022-00912-4.

Evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound LI-RADS version 2017: application on 271 liver nodules in individuals with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2017 in a population with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH).

METHODS

Between January 2013 and December 2020, consecutive patients diagnosed with NASH with untreated liver nodules were enrolled in this retrospective study. A prospective evaluation was performed between January 2021 and August 2021 as a validation set. Diagnostic performance was assessed.

RESULTS

We included 217 nodules in 211 patients (mean age, 49.7 ± 21.7 years; male, 156) in the retrospective study. The positive predictive value (PPV) of CEUS LR-5 in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was 70.8% (56/79). In total, 28 of 217 (12.9%) nodules were classified as LR-M, of which 12 showed arterial phase hyper-enhancement, early washout, and absence of a punched-out appearance within 5 min; 10 of the 12 (83%) were HCC. When these nodules were reclassified as LR-5, the specificity of LR-M as a predictor of non-HCC malignancy increased from 91.0 (181/199) to 96.5% (192/199) (p = .023). Despite the reclassification, LR-5 specificity and PPV remained high (80.6% and 72.5%, respectively). Following reclassification, LR-M specificity increased from 90.0 (45/50) to 100% (50/50) (p = .022) in the validation set.

CONCLUSION

CEUS LI-RADS category LR-5 is effective in predicting the presence of HCC. In NASH patients, diagnostic performance can be further improved by reclassifying LR-M nodules with arterial phase hyper-enhancement, early washout, and punched-out appearance as LR-5.

KEY POINTS

• The LI-RADS classification of CEUS has a high application value for differentiation of HCC in NASH patients. • When LR-M nodules with arterial phase hyperenhancement and early washout but not punched-out appearance at < 5 min are reclassified as LR-5; the modification of LI-RADS has a better performance. • The PPV of modified LR-5 in the non-cirrhotic group was better than that of LR-5. The PPV of modified CEUS LR-5 in the non-cirrhotic group was comparable to that in the cirrhotic group (p both = 0.065).

Real-life assessment of standardized contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and CEUS algorithms (CEUS LI-RADS®/ESCULAP) in hepatic nodules in cirrhotic patients-a prospective multicenter study

OBJECTIVES

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be diagnosed non-invasively with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in cirrhosis if the characteristic pattern of arterial phase hyperenhancement followed by hypoenhancement is present. Recent studies suggest that diagnosis based on this "hyper-hypo" pattern needs further refinement. This study compares the diagnostic accuracies of standardized CEUS for HCC according to the current guideline definition and following the newly developed CEUS algorithms (CEUS LI-RADS®, ESCULAP) in a prospective multicenter real-life setting.

METHODS

Cirrhotic patients with liver lesions on B-mode ultrasound were recruited prospectively from 04/2018 to 04/2019, and clinical and imaging data were collected. The CEUS standard included an additional examination point after 4-6 min in case of no washout after 3 min. The diagnostic accuracies of CEUS following the guidelines ("hyper-hypo" pattern), based on the examiner's subjective interpretation ("CEUS subjective"), and based on the CEUS algorithms ESCULAP and CEUS LI-RADS® were compared.

RESULTS

In total, 470 cirrhotic patients were recruited in 43 centers. The final diagnosis was HCC in 378 cases (80.4%) according to the reference standard (histology 77.4%, MRI 16.4%, CT 6.2%). The "hyper-hypo" pattern yielded 74.3% sensitivity and 63% specificity. "CEUS subjective" showed a higher diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, 91.5%; specificity, 67.4%; positive predictive value, 92%; negative predictive value, 66%). Sensitivity was higher for ESCULAP (95%) and "CEUS subjective" (91.5%) versus CEUS LI-RADS® (65.2%; p < 0.001). Specificity was highest for CEUS LI-RADS® (78.6%; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS has an excellent diagnostic accuracy for the non-invasive diagnosis of HCC in cirrhosis. CEUS algorithms may be a helpful refinement of the "hyper-hypo" pattern defined by current HCC guidelines.

KEY POINTS

• Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has a high diagnostic accuracy for the non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhosis. • The CEUS algorithm ESCULAP (Erlanger Synopsis for Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound for Liver lesion Assessment in Patients at risk) showed the highest sensitivity, whereas the CEUS LI-RADS® (Contrast-Enhanced UltraSound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System) algorithm yielded the highest specificity. • A standardized CEUS examination procedure with an additional examination point in the late phase, after 4-6 min in lesions with no washout after 3 min, is vital.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Algorithms (CEUS-LIRADS/ESCULAP) for the Noninvasive Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma - A Prospective Multicenter DEGUM Study

BACKGROUND

 This prospective multicenter study funded by the DEGUM assesses the diagnostic accuracy of standardized contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in high-risk patients.

METHODS

 Patients at high risk for HCC with a histologically proven focal liver lesion on B-mode ultrasound were recruited prospectively in a multicenter approach. Clinical and imaging data were entered via online entry forms. The diagnostic accuracies for the noninvasive diagnosis of HCC were compared for the conventional interpretation of standardized CEUS at the time of the examination (= CEUS on-site) and the two CEUS algorithms ESCULAP (Erlanger Synopsis for Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound for Liver lesion Assessment in Patients at risk) and CEUS LI-RADS (Contrast-Enhanced UltraSound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System).

RESULTS

 321 patients were recruited in 43 centers; 299 (93.1 %) had liver cirrhosis. The diagnosis according to histology was HCC in 256 cases, and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) in 23 cases. In the subgroup of cirrhotic patients (n = 299), the highest sensitivity for the diagnosis of HCC was achieved with the CEUS algorithm ESCULAP (94.2 %) and CEUS on-site (90.9 %). The lowest sensitivity was reached with the CEUS LI-RADS algorithm (64 %; p < 0.001). However, the specificity of CEUS LI-RADS (78.9 %) was superior to that of ESCULAP (50.9 %) and CEUS on-site (64.9 %; p < 0.001). At the same time, the negative predictive value (NPV) of CEUS LI-RADS was significantly inferior to that of ESCULAP (34.1 % vs. 67.4 %; p < 0.001) and CEUS on-site (62.7 %; p < 0.001). The positive predictive values of all modalities were high (around 90 %), with the best results seen for CEUS LI-RADS and CEUS on-site.

CONCLUSION

 This is the first multicenter, prospective comparison of standardized CEUS and the recently developed CEUS-based algorithms in histologically proven liver lesions in cirrhotic patients. Our results reaffirm the excellent diagnostic accuracy of CEUS for the noninvasive diagnosis of HCC in high-risk patients. However, on-site diagnosis by an experienced examiner achieves an almost equal diagnostic accuracy compared to CEUS-based diagnostic algorithms.

Primary Hepatic Extranodal Marginal Zone Lymphoma of Mucosa-Associated Lymphoid Tissue in a Patient with Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection: Case Report and Summary of the Literature

Background: The incidence of extranodal marginal zone lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT lymphoma) is low, at 7–8% of all non-Hodgkin lymphoma cases. The most common site of MALT lymphoma occurrence is the stomach. Primary hepatic extranodal marginal zone lymphoma of MALT is classified as a type of non-gastric MALT lymphoma and is considered extremely rare, with no consensus on imaging study findings or treatment due to a limited number of reports. We herein describe a rare case of primary hepatic extranodal marginal zone lymphoma of MALT with underlying hepatitis B infection (HBV) and present useful diagnostic findings of various imaging modalities, including contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) with Sonazoid. Case presentation: A 66-year-old woman was diagnosed as being a non-active carrier of HBV at 51 years of age at the time of total hysterectomy and bilateral adnexectomy for uterine cervical cancer. She was admitted to our hospital following the incidental detection of two focal liver lesions on computed tomography. The lesions were considered malignant based on clinical and other radiologic imaging findings. Her CEUS results of hypo-enhancement in the portal and late phases were consistent with those of previously reported cases of hepatic extranodal marginal zone lymphoma of MALT, and histological liver biopsy findings were compatible with the diagnosis. Conclusions: Primary hepatic extranodal marginal zone lymphoma of MALT is a rare condition that can appear in HBV carriers. Characteristic CEUS findings may help in disease diagnosis. Clinicians should bear primary hepatic extranodal marginal zone lymphoma of MALT in mind when encountering patients with focal liver lesions which exhibit image findings different from those of typical hepatocellular carcinoma.

Performance of Ultrasound Techniques and the Potential of Artificial Intelligence in the Evaluation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Global statistics show an increasing percentage of patients that develop non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and NAFLD-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), even in the absence of cirrhosis. In the present review, we analyzed the diagnostic performance of ultrasonography (US) in the non-invasive evaluation of NAFLD and NAFLD-related HCC, as well as possibilities of optimizing US diagnosis with the help of artificial intelligence (AI) assistance. To date, US is the first-line examination recommended in the screening of patients with clinical suspicion of NAFLD, as it is readily available and leads to a better disease-specific surveillance. However, the conventional US presents limitations that significantly hamper its applicability in quantifying NAFLD and accurately characterizing a given focal liver lesion (FLL). Ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) are an essential add-on to the conventional B-mode US and to the Doppler US that further empower this method, allowing the evaluation of the enhancement properties and the vascular architecture of FLLs, in comparison to the background parenchyma. The current paper also explores the new universe of AI and the various implications of deep learning algorithms in the evaluation of NAFLD and NAFLD-related HCC through US methods, concluding that it could potentially be a game changer for patient care.

Contrast-enhanced US with Sulfur Hexafluoride and Perfluorobutane for the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Individuals with High Risk

Background Perfluorobutane (PFB) and sulfur hexafluoride (SHF) have different physiologic characteristics, but it is unclear whether hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) show similar wash-in and washout patterns to both contrast agents at US. Purpose To investigate Contrast-Enhanced US Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2017 HCC categorization by comparing PFB-enhanced US and SHF-enhanced US in participants at high risk for HCC. Materials and Methods In this prospective study conducted from February to August 2019, participants at high risk for HCC with treatment-naive hepatic observations (≥1 cm) categorized as LR-3, LR-4, LR-5, or LR-M (intermediate probability of HCC, probable HCC, definitely HCC, and probably malignant but not HCC specific, respectively) on cross-sectional images were screened. They underwent same-day PFB-enhanced US and SHF-enhanced US. Arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE), washout time and degree, and echogenicity in the Kupffer phase (PFB-enhanced US) were evaluated and categorized by the operator using CEUS LI-RADS, who referred to the radiologist who performed the contrast-enhanced US, and by a reviewer. Diagnostic performance was analyzed using the McNemar test. Results Fifty-nine participants were evaluated (43 with HCC, 10 with non-HCC malignancies, six with benign findings). Nonrim APHE was identically observed in 95% (41 of 43, operator) or 88% (38 of 43, reviewer) of HCCs with both contrast agents. Among 43 HCCs, late (≥60 seconds) and mild washout were more frequent with PFB-enhanced US (34 with operator, 33 with reviewer) than with SHF-enhanced US (24 with operator, 26 with reviewer) (P = .04 or P = .12). The washout time for HCCs was later at PFB-enhanced US (median, 101 seconds ± 11) than at SHF-enhanced US (median, 84 seconds ± 5; P = .04). Sensitivity (34 of 43; 79%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 64%, 90%) was higher with PFB-enhanced US than with SHF-enhanced US (23 of 43; 54%; 95% CI: 38%, 67%; P = .01). Specificity was 100% (95% CI: 79%, 100%) with both. Hypoenhancement in the Kupffer phase was more common in malignant (49 of 53 [92%] for both operator and reviewer) than in benign (two of six [33%] for operator, one of six [16%] for reviewer) lesions. Conclusion On the basis of the Contrast-Enhanced US Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2017 algorithm, noninvasive US diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma by using perfluorobutane-enhanced US had higher diagnostic performance than sulfur hexafluoride-enhanced US, without loss of specificity. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Kim and Jang in this issue.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Focal Hepatic Lesions: When to Use and How to Differentiate Lesions?

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound can be used effectively to evaluate focal hepatic lesions and offers unique advantages over computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Serial vascular filling patterns of focal hepatic lesions during arterial, portal, and late phases can provide unique information on lesion characterization and differentiation. Sensitive depiction of arterial hypervascularity and analysis of washout pattern are clues for differentiation of several indeterminate hepatic nodules on conventional ultrasound and computed tomography/magnetic resonance. In this report, we present cases demonstrating clinical applications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of focal hepatic lesions.

Diagnostic Accuracy of CEUS LI-RADS for the Characterization of Liver Nodules 20 mm or Smaller in Patients at Risk for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background American College of Radiology contrast agent-enhanced US Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (CEUS LI-RADS) was developed to improve the accuracy of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosis at contrast agent-enhanced US. However, to the knowledge of the authors, the diagnostic accuracy of the system in characterization of liver nodules 20 mm or smaller has not been fully evaluated. Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CEUS LI-RADS in diagnosing HCC in liver nodules 20 mm or smaller in patients at risk for HCC. Materials and Methods Between January 2015 and February 2018, consecutive patients at risk for HCC presenting with untreated liver nodules 20 mm or less were enrolled in this retrospective double-reader study. Each nodule was categorized according to the CEUS LI-RADS and World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB)-European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) criteria. Diagnostic performance of CEUS LI-RADS and WFUMB-EFSUMB characterization was evaluated by using tissue histologic analysis, multiphase contrast-enhanced CT and MRI, and imaging follow-up as reference standard and compared by using McNemar test. Results The study included 175 nodules (mean diameter, 16.1 mm ± 3.4) in 172 patients (mean age, 51.8 years ± 10.6; 136 men). The sensitivity of CEUS LR-5 versus WFUMB-EFSUMB criteria in diagnosing HCC was 73.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 63.8%, 81.5%) versus 88.6% (95% CI: 80.9%, 94%), respectively (P < .001). The specificity of CEUS LR-5 versus WFUMB-EFSUMB criteria was 97.1% (95% CI: 90.1%, 99.7%) versus 87.1% (95% CI: 77%, 94%), respectively (P = .02). No malignant lesions were found in CEUS LR-1 and LR-2 categories. Only two nodules (of 41; 5%, both HCC) were malignant in CEUS LR-3 category. The incidences of HCC in CEUS LR-4, LR-5, and LR-M were 48% (11 of 23), 98% (77 of 79), and 75% (15 of 20), respectively. Two of 175 (1.1%) histologic analysis-confirmed intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas were categorized as CEUS LR-M by CEUS LI-RADS and misdiagnosed as HCC by WFUMB-EFSUMB criteria. Conclusion The contrast-enhanced US Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (CEUS LI-RADS) algorithm was an effective tool for characterization of small (≤20 mm) liver nodules in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Compared with World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology-European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology criteria, CEUS LR-5 demonstrated higher specificity for diagnosing small HCCs with lower sensitivity. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. See also the editorial by Crocetti in this issue.

The interreader agreement and validation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system

PURPOSE

This study explored the interreader agreement and diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system (CEUS LI-RADS).

METHODS

Between January 2014 and December 2017, 1366 patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent CEUS were included in this retrospective study. Four ultrasound physicians rated the HCC likelihood of focal liver lesions (FLLs) using CEUS LI-RADS v2017. Interreader agreement on CEUS LI-RADS categories and major features (arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE), washout appearance) were assessed using weighted kappa statistics (κ). Diagnostic performance was described by sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV, +LR, -LR.

RESULTS

The interreader agreement (κ) for CEUS LI-RADS categories, APHE, and washout appearance ranged from 0.61 to 0.73, 0.65 to 0.83, and 0.58 to 0.71, respectively. Interreader agreement for LI-RADS categories and APHE were almost substantial between FLLs <2 cm, ≥2 cm, <5 cm; interreader agreement for major features were fair to substantial for FLLs ≥5 cm. The accuracy, PPV and + LR for HCC and malignancy in FLLs <2 cm, ≥2 cm, <5 cm, ≥5 cm were high, with values of 84.7% to 91.9%, 90.2% to 94.2%, and 2.2 to 8.0, respectively. CEUS LI-RADS had the highest specificity for HCC (90.2%) and malignancy (90.9%) diagnosis for FLLs <2 cm and <5 cm, respectively; specificity was lowest for HCC (54.7%) and malignancy (68.3%) diagnosis for FLLs ≥5 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS LI-RADS is a good standardized categorization system for high-risk patients, and the combination of two or three LR-M features may improve the true-negative classification of HCC diagnosis.

State of the Art: LI-RADS for Contrast-enhanced US

Contrast material-enhanced (CE) US is a recognized imaging tool in the characterization of focal liver lesions and uses microbubble contrast agents to increase signal backscattering from the blood. The European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology and the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology strongly recommend the use of CE US in the characterization of hepatocellular nodules in individuals with liver cirrhosis. CE US was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for liver indications in adult and pediatric patients. CE US Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) criteria were recently proposed by the American College of Radiology and include eight distinct diagnostic categories: LR-1 (definitely benign), LR-2 (probably benign), LR-3 (intermediate malignancy probability), LR-4 (probably hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC]), LR-5 (definitely HCC), LR-NC (cannot be categorized due to image degradation), LR-TIV (tumor in vein), and LR-M (probably or definitely malignant but not HCC specific). CE US LI-RADS criteria can be used to produce a structured report for HCC diagnosis. However, the variability of US equipment in terms of sensitivity to microbubble signal, interreader variability, large number of HCC nodules classified as LR-3, and wide washout temporal range for LR-M observations are limitations.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in differential diagnosis of focal gallbladder adenomyomatosis and gallbladder cancer

BACKGROUND

Focal gallbladder adenomyomatosis (ADM) is a common disease that mimics gallbladder cancer (GBC) on ultrasonography.

OBJECTIVE

Here we aim to assess the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in differentiating ADM from GBC.

METHODS

Forty-one histopathologically proven focal ADMs and 34 GBCs (≤T2 stage) were enrolled in the study. Lesion location, blood flow signals, contrast pattern and appearance on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) were compared respectively.

RESULTS

Lesions were detected in fundus, body, neck at the rates of 61.0% (25/41), 26.8% (11/41) and 12.2% (5/41), respectively, in ADM patients, in comparison to 29.4% (10/34), 32.4% (11/34) and 38.2% (13/34), respectively, in GBC patients (p = 0.009). Blood flow signals were detected in 19.5% (8/41) of cases in ADMs, compared to 58.8% (20/34) in GBCs (p = 0.001). On CEUS, iso-enhancement, hypo-enhancement, intramural anechoic space and intactness of GB wall were detected in 41.5% (17/41), 39.0% (16/41), 56.1% (23/41) and 80.5% (33/41) cases of ADMs, in contrast to 17.6% (6/34), 20.6% (7/34), 20.6% (7/34) and 17.6% (6/34) of GBCs (p = 0.001, p = 0.001, p = 0.002, p < 0.001, respectively). The prior Youden's index were 0.81 based on intactness of GB wall on CEUS.

CONCLUSION

Combined with CEUS helps improve the differential diagnosis accuracy of focal gallbladder ADMs.

The preliminary application of liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) on small hepatic nodules (≤ 2cm)

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma with hepatic nodules (≤2cm). We retrospectively evaluated 56 CEUS exam records of hepatic nodules (≤2cm) performed between January 2015 and July 2016 at West China hospital. Each nodule was classified into a LI-RADS-CEUS category by two radiologists according to imaging features. The ultimate CEUS categories were then compared with pathological reports and their correlation was then calculated. Inter-observer agreement for LI-RADS between reader A and B was κ, 0.690, illustrating good consistency. The diagnostic accuracy of LR-5 on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was 86.49% but 11.11% for LR-M. LI-RADS-CEUS is a potential standardized categorization system for high-risk HCC patients but might also increase the false-negative diagnosis of nodules of less than 2cm.

Interobserver and intermodality agreement of standardized algorithms for non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in high-risk patients: CEUS-LI-RADS versus MRI-LI-RADS

OBJECTIVES

We compared the interobserver agreement for the recently introduced contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)-based algorithm CEUS-LI-RADS (Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System) versus the well-established magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-LI-RADS for non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in high-risk patients.

METHODS

Focal liver lesions in 50 high-risk patients (mean age 66.2 ± 11.8 years; 39 male) were assessed retrospectively with CEUS and MRI. Two independent observers reviewed CEUS and MRI examinations, separately, classifying observations according to CEUS-LI-RADSv.2016 and MRI-LI-RADSv.2014. Interobserver agreement was assessed with Cohen's kappa.

RESULTS

Forty-three lesions were HCCs; two were intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas; five were benign lesions. Arterial phase hyperenhancement was perceived less frequently with CEUS than with MRI (37/50 / 38/50 lesions = 74%/78% [CEUS; observer 1/observer 2] versus 46/50 / 44/50 lesions = 92%/88% [MRI; observer 1/observer 2]). Washout appearance was observed in 34/50 / 20/50 lesions = 68%/40% with CEUS and 31/50 / 31/50 lesions = 62%/62%) with MRI. Interobserver agreement was moderate for arterial hyperenhancement (ĸ = 0.511/0.565 [CEUS/MRI]) and "washout" (ĸ = 0.490/0.582 [CEUS/MRI]), fair for CEUS-LI-RADS category (ĸ = 0.309) and substantial for MRI-LI-RADS category (ĸ = 0.609). Intermodality agreement was fair for arterial hyperenhancement (ĸ = 0.329), slight to fair for "washout" (ĸ = 0.202) and LI-RADS category (ĸ = 0.218) CONCLUSION: Interobserver agreement is substantial for MRI-LI-RADS and only fair for CEUS-LI-RADS. This is mostly because interobserver agreement in the perception of washout appearance is better in MRI than in CEUS. Further refinement of the LI-RADS algorithms and increasing education and practice may be necessary to improve the concordance between CEUS and MRI for the final LI-RADS categorization.

KEY POINTS

• CEUS-LI-RADS and MRI-LIRADS enable standardized non-invasive diagnosis of HCC in high-risk patients. • With CEUS, interobserver agreement is better for arterial hyperenhancement than for "washout". • Interobserver agreement for major features is moderate for both CEUS and MRI. • Interobserver agreement for LI-RADS category is substantial for MRI, and fair for CEUS. • Interobserver-agreement for CEUS-LI-RADS will presumably improve with ongoing use of the algorithm.

Imaging Findings Within the First 12 Months of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

To correlate the imaging findings of treated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with explant pathology and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) response.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 2007 to 2015, of 146 patients treated with liver SBRT for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage A hepatocellular carcinoma, 10 were identified with inclusion criteria and had regular interval follow-up magnetic resonance imaging/triple phase computed tomography and explant pathology or declining AFP values for radiology-pathology response correlation. Reference standards for successful response were >90% necrosis on explant pathology or pretreatment AFP >75 ng/mL normalizing to <10 ng/mL within 1 year after SBRT without other treatment. Subjects were treated with 24 to 50 Gy in 3 to 5 fractions. Multiphasic magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography performed at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after SBRT was compared with pretreatment imaging by 2 expert radiologists. Descriptive statistics were calculated.

RESULTS

There were 10 subjects with 10 treated HCCs, classified as 3 Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) 5a, 4 OPTN 5b, and 3 OPTN 5x. All had successfully treated HCCs, according to explant pathology or declining AFP. Four of 10 HCCs had persistent central arterial hyperenhancement 3 to 12 months after SBRT; persistent wash-out was common up to 12 months (9 of 10). Of 10 treated HCCs, 9 exhibited decreased size at 12 months. Liver parenchyma adjacent to the lesion showed early (3-6 months) hyperemia followed by late (6-12 months) capsular retraction and delayed enhancement. No patient had a significant decline in liver function.

CONCLUSIONS

In the absence of increasing size, persistent central arterial hyperenhancement and wash-out can occur within the first 12 months after SBRT in successfully treated HCCs and may not represent residual viable tumor. Liver parenchyma adjacent to the treated lesion showed inflammation followed by fibrosis, without significant change in hepatic function. Until a radiologic signature of tumor control is determined, freedom from local progression seems to be the best measure of HCC control after SBRT.

Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis with evidence from 1998 to 2016

Background

This meta-analysis is aimed at determining the diagnostic value of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).

Materials and Methods

A comprehensive literature search of Pubmed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was performed to identify published studies. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated. Data from eligible studies were used to estimate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), positive and negative likelihood ratio (LR) and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve. Meta-Disc and STATA softwares were utilized for all statistical analyses.

Results

Fifty-three eligible studies (publication years ranged from 1998 to 2016) were selected according to inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed that the pooled sensitivity and specificity of CEUS to detect HCC were 0.85 (95% CI: 0.84–0.86) and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.90–0.92), respectively. The pooled positive and negative LRs were 6.28 (95% CI: 4.49–8.77) and 0.16 (95% CI: 0.12–0.22), respectively. The pooled DOR was 55.01 (95% CI: 35.25–83.47). The area under the SCOR curve was 0.9432. Meta-regression and funnel plot indicated that sample size, type of contrast agents and publication bias might be the major sources of heterogeneity.

Conclusions

CEUS is a valuable diagnostic tool for identifying HCC in clinic with highly sensitive and specific.

Effect of contrast-enhanced ultrasound on differential diagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and arterial phase enhanced hepatic inflammatory lesions

OBJECTIVE

To investigate differential diagnosis between intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and arterial phase enhanced hepatic inflammatory lesions in patients without liver cirrhosis using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).

METHODS

ICC and hepatic inflammatory lesions cases with CEUS and pathological diagnosis between Sep 2013 and Oct 2016 were investigated retrospectively. Imaging features of conventional ultrasound and CEUS were analyzed. The parameters of time intensity curve (TIC), including the arrival time, peak intensity (PI) in the lesions, the starting time for washout, and the intensity difference at 3 min (ΔI3) after contrast agent infection between the lesion and the liver parenchyma, were compared between ICC and hepatic inflammatory lesions.

RESULTS

Twenty-five ICC and fifteen inflammatory patients were included in this study. Seventeen ICC (68.0%) and two inflammatory cases (13.3%) showed bile duct dilatation on conventional ultrasound. Using CEUS, three ICC cases (12.0%) were misdiagnosed as inflammatory lesions and three inflammatory lesions (20.0%) as ICC; two ICC (8.0%) and one inflammatory case (6.7%) could not be made definite diagnosis. Washout started at 34.5±3.5 s and 61.5±12.9 s for ICC and inflammatory lesions respectively (P<0.001). The intensity difference between lesion and liver parenchyma at 3 min after contrast agent injection was 10.8±3.1 dB in ICC and 4.2±2.3 dB in inflammatory group (P<0.001). The sensitivity and specificity differentiating ICC and inflammatory lesions were 76% and 87% if the cut-off value of the intensity difference was 7.7 dB.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined with TIC analysis, and particularly with the characteristic of the early-starting and obvious washout in ICC, CEUS can be useful in differential diagnosis between hepatic inflammatory lesions and ICC.