1
|
Zwerwer LR, Kloka J, van der Pol S, Postma MJ, Zacharowski K, van Asselt ADI, Friedrichson B. Mechanical ventilation as a major driver of COVID-19 hospitalization costs: a costing study in a German setting. HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW 2024; 14:4. [PMID: 38227207 PMCID: PMC10790444 DOI: 10.1186/s13561-023-00476-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While COVID-19 hospitalization costs are essential for policymakers to make informed health care resource decisions, little is known about these costs in western Europe. The aim of the current study is to analyze these costs for a German setting, track the development of these costs over time and analyze the daily costs. METHODS Administrative costing data was analyzed for 598 non-Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients and 510 ICU patients diagnosed with COVID-19 at the Frankfurt University hospital. Descriptive statistics of total per patient hospitalization costs were obtained and assessed over time. Propensity scores were estimated for length of stay (LOS) at the general ward and mechanical ventilation (MV) duration, using covariate balancing propensity score for continuous treatment. Costs for each additional day in the general ward and each additional day in the ICU with and without MV were estimated by regressing the total hospitalization costs on the LOS and the presence or absence of several treatments using generalized linear models, while controlling for patient characteristics, comorbidities, and complications. RESULTS Median total per patient hospitalization costs were €3,010 (Q1 - Q3: €2,224-€5,273), €5,887 (Q1 - Q3: €3,054-€10,879) and €21,536 (Q1 - Q3: €7,504-€43,480), respectively, for non-ICU patients, non-MV and MV ICU patients. Total per patient hospitalization costs for non-ICU patients showed a slight increase over time, while total per patient hospitalization costs for ICU patients decreased over time. Each additional day in the general ward for non-ICU COVID-19 patients costed €463.66 (SE: 15.89). Costs for each additional day in the general ward and ICU without and with mechanical ventilation for ICU patients were estimated at €414.20 (SE: 22.17), €927.45 (SE: 45.52) and €2,224.84 (SE: 70.24). CONCLUSIONS This is, to our knowledge, the first study examining the costs of COVID-19 hospitalizations in Germany. Estimated costs were overall in agreement with costs found in literature for non-COVID-19 patients, except for higher estimated costs for mechanical ventilation. These estimated costs can potentially improve the precision of COVID-19 cost effectiveness studies in Germany and will thereby allow health care policymakers to provide better informed health care resource decisions in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leslie R Zwerwer
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
- Center for Information Technology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Jan Kloka
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Simon van der Pol
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Health-Ecore, Zeist, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten J Postma
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Health-Ecore, Zeist, The Netherlands
- Department of Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Kai Zacharowski
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Antoinette D I van Asselt
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Benjamin Friedrichson
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Senn KC, Thiele S, Kummer K, Walter MC, Nagels KH. Cost of illness in inclusion body myositis: results from a cross-sectional study in Germany. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2023; 18:337. [PMID: 37880781 PMCID: PMC10601274 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-023-02902-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inclusion body myositis (IBM) is the most frequent type of myositis in elder patients with a slow chronic progression and refractory to treatment. Previous cost of illness (COI) studies in IBM used claims data to estimate direct costs in the US. No evidence exists globally on both direct and indirect costs in IBM from a societal perspective. We conducted a survey in patients registered in the German IBM patient registry. Self-developed items were used to assess the utilized healthcare resources and estimate the cost. The German Self-Administered Comorbidity Questionnaire (SCQ-D), the sIBM Physical Functioning Assessment (sIFA) and patient-reported measures for satisfaction and improvements in healthcare were applied for an explorative analysis. RESULTS In total, 82 patients completed the survey. We estimated the mean total annual per capita COI of US$102,682 (95% CI US$82,763-US$123,090) in 2021. 92.7% of the total COI were direct costs. Medical costs were similar to nonmedical costs, with substantial costs for pharmacotherapy and informal care. Depending on the prevalence estimate, the total national COI per year were US$42.7 million-US$213.7 million. Significant differences in total COI were identified for the degree of disability, marital and employment status (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS We identified remarkable and heterogenous cost in IBM. As informal care costs represented the most relevant cost driver, caregiver burden is a major factor in the patient journey. For the first time, comprehensive economic potentials were identified as a basis to improve the actual care situations and prioritizing future activities for research, pharmaceutical and digital product development as well as health politics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katja C Senn
- Chair of Healthcare Management and Health Services Research, University of Bayreuth, Parsifalstrasse 25, 95445, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Simone Thiele
- Department of Neurology, Friedrich Baur Institute, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Ziemssenstrasse 1, 80336, Munich, Germany
| | - Karsten Kummer
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Goettingen, 37075, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Maggie C Walter
- Department of Neurology, Friedrich Baur Institute, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Ziemssenstrasse 1, 80336, Munich, Germany
| | - Klaus H Nagels
- Chair of Healthcare Management and Health Services Research, University of Bayreuth, Parsifalstrasse 25, 95445, Bayreuth, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ayinde O, Ross JDC, Jackson L. Economic evaluation of antimicrobial resistance in curable sexually transmitted infections; a systematic review and a case study. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0292273. [PMID: 37856496 PMCID: PMC10586702 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide a summary of the economic and methodological evidence on capturing antimicrobial resistance (AMR) associated costs for curable sexually transmitted infections (STIs). To explore approaches for incorporating the cost of AMR within an economic model evaluating different treatment strategies for gonorrhoea, as a case study. METHODS A systematic review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022298232). MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, International Health Technology Assessment Database, National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database, and EconLit databases were searched up to August 2022. Included studies were analysed, quality assessed and findings synthesised narratively. Additionally, an economic evaluation which incorporated AMR was undertaken using a decision tree model and primary data from a randomised clinical trial comparing gentamicin therapy with standard treatment (ceftriaxone). AMR was incorporated into the evaluation using three approaches-integrating the additional costs of treating resistant infections, conducting a threshold analysis, and accounting for the societal cost of resistance for the antibiotic consumed. RESULTS Twelve studies were included in the systematic review with the majority focussed on AMR in gonorrhoea. The cost of ceftriaxone resistant gonorrhoea and the cost of ceftriaxone sparing strategies were significant and related to the direct medical costs from persistent gonorrhoea infections, sequelae of untreated infections, gonorrhoea attributable-HIV transmission and AMR testing. However, AMR definition, the collection and incorporation of AMR associated costs, and the perspectives adopted were inconsistent or limited. Using the review findings, different approaches were explored for incorporating AMR into an economic evaluation comparing gentamicin to ceftriaxone for gonorrhoea treatment. Although the initial analysis showed that ceftriaxone was the cheaper treatment, gentamicin became cost-neutral if the clinical efficacy of ceftriaxone reduced from 98% to 92%. By incorporating societal costs of antibiotic use, gentamicin became cost-neutral if the cost of ceftriaxone treatment increased from £4.60 to £8.44 per patient. CONCLUSIONS Inclusion of AMR into economic evaluations may substantially influence estimates of cost-effectiveness and affect subsequent treatment recommendations for gonorrhoea and other STIs. However, robust data on the cost of AMR and a standardised approach for conducting economic evaluations for STI treatment which incorporate AMR are lacking, and requires further developmental research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oluseyi Ayinde
- Sexual Health and HIV, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan D. C. Ross
- Sexual Health and HIV, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Louise Jackson
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schnitzler L, Roberts TE, Jackson LJ, Paulus ATG, Evers SMAA. A consensus-based checklist for the critical appraisal of cost-of-illness (COI) studies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2023; 39:e34. [PMID: 37325977 DOI: 10.1017/s0266462323000193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop a consensus-based checklist that can be used as a minimum standard to appraise the comprehensiveness, transparency and consistency of cost-of-illness (COI) studies. This is important when, for instance, reviewing and assessing COI studies as part of a systematic review or when building an economic model. METHODS The development process of the consensus-based checklist involved six steps: (i) a scoping review, (ii) an assessment and comparison of the different checklists and their questions, (iii) the development of a (preliminary) checklist, (iv) expert interviews, (v) the finalization of the checklist, and (vi) the development of guidance statements explaining each question. RESULTS The result was a consensus-based checklist for the critical appraisal of COI studies, comprising seventeen main questions (and some additional subquestions) across three domains: (i) study characteristics; (ii) methodology and cost analysis; and (iii) results and reporting. Guidance statements were developed describing the purpose and meaning behind each question and listing examples of best practice. The following answer categories were suggested to be applied when answering the questions in the checklist: Yes, Partially, No, Not Applicable, or Unclear. CONCLUSIONS The consensus-based checklist for COI studies is a first step toward standardizing the critical appraisal of COI studies and is one that could be considered a minimum standard. The checklist can help to improve comprehensiveness, transparency and consistency in COI studies, to address heterogeneity, and to enable better comparability of methodological approaches across international studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Schnitzler
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Tracy E Roberts
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Louise J Jackson
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Aggie T G Paulus
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- School of Health Professions Education (SHE), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Silvia M A A Evers
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Trimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
d'Errico M, Pavlova M, Spandonaro F. The economic burden of obesity in Italy: a cost-of-illness study. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2022; 23:177-192. [PMID: 34347176 PMCID: PMC8882110 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-021-01358-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obesity is a complex health disorder that significantly increases the risk of several chronic diseases, and it has been associated with a 5-20-year decrease in life expectancy. The prevalence of obesity is increasing steadily worldwide and Italy follows this trend with an increase of almost 30% in the adult obese population in the last 3 decades. Previous studies estimated that 2-4% of the total health expenditure in Europe is attributed to obesity and it is projected to double by 2050. Currently, there is a lack of sufficient knowledge on the burden of obesity in Italy and most relevant estimates are derived from international studies. The aim of this study is to estimate the direct and indirect costs of obesity in Italy, taking 2020 as the reference year. METHODS Based on data collected from the literature, a quantitative cost-of-illness (COI) study was performed from a societal perspective focussing on the adult obese population (Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2) in Italy. RESULTS The study indicated that the total costs attributable to obesity in Italy amounted to €13.34 billion in 2020 (95% credible interval: €8.99 billion < µ < €17.80 billion). Direct costs were €7.89 billion, with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) having the highest impact on costs (€6.66 billion), followed by diabetes (€0.65 billion), cancer (€0.33 billion), and bariatric surgery (€0.24 billion). Indirect costs amounted to €5.45 billion, with almost equal contribution of absenteeism (€2.62 billion) and presenteeism (€2.83 billion). CONCLUSIONS Obesity is associated with high direct and indirect costs, and cost-effective prevention programmes are deemed fundamental to contain this public health threat in Italy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margherita d'Errico
- Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, CAPHRI, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 60, 6229, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Milena Pavlova
- Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, CAPHRI, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 60, 6229, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Federico Spandonaro
- Department of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Economics and Finance, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via Columbia 2, 00133, Rome, Italy
- Centre for Economic Applied Research in Health (C.R.E.A. Sanità), Piazza Antonio Mancini 4, 00196, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schnorbach MT, Kruis W. [Cost of illness of inflammatory bowel disease in Germany]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2020; 59:1173-1188. [PMID: 32869213 DOI: 10.1055/a-1174-0670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in Germany is rising. Due to a disease onset at a young age, direct and indirect costs are important. The aim of the present study is to provide a comprehensive presentation of existing healthcare costs for these diseases in Germany and to compare them by inflation adjustments for 2018. MATERIAL AND METHODS Performing a systematic literature search, monetary costs were extracted from German and English literature. Quality and relevance of the studies were assessed with a checklist. RESULTS The average outpatient cost for inflammatory bowel disease amounts between 18 and 87 Euro/pat/30 days, the average inpatient cost was between 1026 and 9083 Euro/case. Depending on the type of calculation, biologicals cause different amounts of cost. Few data are available for direct medical 82 and 618 Euro/pat/30 days, direct non-medical 63 and 84 Euro/pat/30 days and indirect costs 463 and 3493 Euro/pat/30 days. The total costs are about 533 Euro/pat/30 days, related to one year 6485 Euro/pat. CONCLUSION For the first time, it is possible to compare existing medical costs for IBD in Germany. Current studies feature very heterogeneous methods and study populations of IBD. Depending on the collective, the total costs are up to 6485 Euro/patient/year.
Collapse
|
7
|
Personality, Health Care Use, and Costs: A Study Protocol for a Systematic Review. Healthcare (Basel) 2020; 8:healthcare8030263. [PMID: 32806553 PMCID: PMC7551013 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare8030263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Revised: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent empirical studies have shown that personality factors are associated with health care use (HCU). However, to date, a systematic review is lacking summarizing evidence regarding the link between personality factors and health care use or costs (i.e., monetarily valued health care use). Therefore, the objective of this systematic review is to provide an overview of evidence from observational studies investigating the link between personality characteristics and health care use or costs. Electronic databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, NHS EED) will be searched using predefined search terms. In an additional step, the reference lists of included studies will be searched (manually). No restrictions will be applied regarding the time of publication. Observational studies (both cross-sectional and longitudinal) assessing the link between personality characteristics and health care use/costs across all age categories will be included. Only studies using validated tools to quantify personality characteristics will be included. Among others, studies only focusing on mental HCU or studies only analyzing samples with a specific disorder (e.g., individuals with personality disorders) will be excluded. Mainly, data on methods (study design, measures, and statistical analysis), sample characteristics, and results regarding the link between personality and HCU/costs will be extracted. A quality assessment will be conducted. Two reviewers will perform the study selection, data extraction, and assessment of the study quality. If disagreements occur, they will be resolved through discussion to reach a consensus or by inclusion of a third party. Results will be presented narratively (text and tables). Depending on the number and heterogeneity of the studies included, a meta-analysis will be conducted. Results will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed, scientific journal.
Collapse
|
8
|
Monahan M, Jowett S, Pinkney T, Brocklehurst P, Morton DG, Abdali Z, Roberts TE. Surgical site infection and costs in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review of the economic burden. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0232960. [PMID: 32497086 PMCID: PMC7272045 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2020] [Accepted: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical site infection (SSI) is a worldwide problem which has morbidity, mortality and financial consequences. The incidence rate of SSI is high in Low- and Middle-Income countries (LMICs) compared to high income countries, and the costly surgical complication can raise the potential risk of financial catastrophe. OBJECTIVE The aim of the study is to critically appraise studies on the cost of SSI in a range of LMIC studies and compare these estimates with a reference standard of high income European studies who have explored similar SSI costs. METHODS A systematic review was undertaken using searches of two electronic databases, EMBASE and MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, up to February 2019. Study characteristics, comparator group, methods and results were extracted by using a standard template. RESULTS Studies from 15 LMIC and 16 European countries were identified and reviewed in full. The additional cost of SSI range (presented in 2017 international dollars) was similar in the LMIC ($174-$29,610) and European countries ($21-$34,000). Huge study design heterogeneity was encountered across the two settings. DISCUSSION SSIs were revealed to have a significant cost burden in both LMICs and High Income Countries in Europe. The magnitude of the costs depends on the SSI definition used, severity of SSI, patient population, choice of comparator, hospital setting, and cost items included. Differences in study design affected the comparability across studies. There is need for multicentre studies with standardized data collection methods to capture relevant costs and consequences of the infection across income settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Monahan
- NIHR Global Health and Global Surgery Unit, Institute of Translational Medicine, Heritage Building, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom
| | - Susan Jowett
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas Pinkney
- Birmingham Surgical Trials Consortium, Institute of Applied Health, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Brocklehurst
- NIHR Global Health and Global Surgery Unit, Institute of Translational Medicine, Heritage Building, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom
- Birmingham Surgical Trials Consortium, Institute of Applied Health, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom
| | - Dion G. Morton
- NIHR Global Health and Global Surgery Unit, Institute of Translational Medicine, Heritage Building, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom
- Birmingham Surgical Trials Consortium, Institute of Applied Health, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom
| | - Zainab Abdali
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom
| | - Tracy E. Roberts
- NIHR Global Health and Global Surgery Unit, Institute of Translational Medicine, Heritage Building, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Golla H, Nettekoven C, Bausewein C, Tonn JC, Thon N, Feddersen B, Schnell O, Böhlke C, Becker G, Rolke R, Clusmann H, Herrlinger U, Radbruch L, Vatter H, Güresir E, Stock S, Müller D, Civello D, Papachristou I, Hellmich M, Hamacher S, Voltz R, Goldbrunner R. Effect of early palliative care for patients with glioblastoma (EPCOG): a randomised phase III clinical trial protocol. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e034378. [PMID: 31915175 PMCID: PMC6955518 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2019] [Revised: 11/15/2019] [Accepted: 11/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have shown a positive effect of early integration of palliative care (EIPC) in various advanced cancer entities regarding patients' quality of life (QoL), survival, mood, caregiver burden and reduction of aggressiveness of treatment near the end of life. However, RCTs investigating the positive effect of EIPC for patients suffering from glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) are lacking. After modelling work identifying the specific needs of GBM patients and their caregivers, the aim of this study is to investigate the impact of EIPC in this particular patient group. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The recruitment period of this multicenter RCT started in May 2019. GBM patients (n=214) and their caregivers will be randomly assigned to either the intervention group (receiving proactive EIPC on a monthly basis) or the control group (receiving treatment according to international standards and additional, regular assessment of QoL ('optimised' standard care)).The primary outcome is QoL assessed by subscales of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for brain tumour (FACT-Br) from baseline to 6 months of treatment. Secondary outcomes are changes in QoL after 12 (end of intervention), 18 and 24 months (end of follow-up), the full FACT-Br scale, patients' palliative care needs, depression/anxiety, cognitive impairment, caregiver burden, healthcare use, cost-effectiveness and overall survival. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and has been approved by the local ethics committees of the University Clinics of Cologne, Aachen, Bonn, Freiburg and Munich (LMU). Results of the trial will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed, open access journal and disseminated through presentations at conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: German Register for Clinical Studies (DRKS) (DRKS00016066); Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidrun Golla
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Charlotte Nettekoven
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Department of General Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Center for Neurosurgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Claudia Bausewein
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Jörg-Christian Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Niklas Thon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Berend Feddersen
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Oliver Schnell
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christopher Böhlke
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Gerhild Becker
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Roman Rolke
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Hans Clusmann
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Ulrich Herrlinger
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Lukas Radbruch
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Hartmut Vatter
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Erdem Güresir
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Stephanie Stock
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology (IGKE), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dirk Müller
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology (IGKE), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Daniele Civello
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology (IGKE), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Irini Papachristou
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Center for Clinical Studies (ZKS), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Martin Hellmich
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology (IMSB), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stefanie Hamacher
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology (IMSB), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Raymond Voltz
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Center for Clinical Studies (ZKS), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology (IMSB), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Roland Goldbrunner
- Department of General Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Center for Neurosurgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Center for Health Services Research (ZVFK), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
|