In vivo characterization of abnormalities in small-bowel diseases using probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy

Role of ultra-high definition endoscopy (endomicroscopy and endocytoscopy) and real-time histologic examination in inflammatory bowel disease: Scoping review

OBJECTIVES

Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) and endocytoscopy (EC) are ultra-high definition (HD) imaging modalities that enable real-time histological assessment. Although existent for nearly two decades, their role in current clinical decision making in inflammatory bowel disease management is not well defined.

METHODS

We searched PubMed using keywords ("confocal" OR "CLE" OR "endocytoscopy") AND ("IBD" OR "inflammatory bowel" OR "Crohn*" OR "Crohn's" OR "colitis ulcerosa" OR "ulcerative colitis") between 2005 and March 2023. We identified 52 studies for detailed review.

RESULTS

Confocal laser endomicroscopy was useful in real-time assessment of histologic inflammation and dysplasia characterization in both ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease. Although CLE was associated with higher per-biopsy yield for UC-associated neoplasia (UCAN), the benefit was offset by higher procedure time, frequent equipment failure, and conflicting results on incremental yield over chromoendoscopy. Assessment of barrier dysfunction by CLE did not correlate with disease/endoscopic activity but could predict major adverse outcomes. The implications of residual CLE abnormalities in endoscopic remission remain uncertain. Ex vivo binding of labeled biologics can help in predicting biologic response in UC. EC can discriminate mucosal inflammatory cells by morphology and allows assessment of histologic activity. EC combined with pit pattern was better than pit pattern alone for UCAN. Artificial intelligence-assisted EC in UCAN needs further study.

CONCLUSION

Ultra-HD imaging in inflammatory bowel disease can be useful in assessment of UCAN, barrier dysfunction, predicting histologic remission, and biologic response. Future controlled studies are warranted to define the role of these novel technologies in clinical decision making.

Updates in the diagnosis and management of small-bowel tumors

Small-bowel tumors represent a rare entity comprising 0.6% of all new cancer cases in the US, and only 3% of all gastrointestinal neoplasms. They are a heterogenous group of neoplasms comprising of about forty different histological subtypes with the most common being adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine tumors, stromal tumors and lymphomas. Their incidence has been reportedly increasing over recent years, partly owing to the advances and developments in the diagnostic modalities. Small-bowel capsule endoscopy, device assisted enteroscopy and dedicated small-bowel cross-sectional imaging are complimentary tools, supplementing each other in the diagnostic process. Therapeutic management of small-bowel tumors largely depends on the histological type and staging at diagnosis. The aim of the present review article is to discuss relevant advances in the diagnosis and management of small-bowel tumors.

The development and clinical application of microscopic endoscopy for in vivo optical biopsies: Endocytoscopy and confocal laser endomicroscopy

Endoscopies are crucial for detecting and diagnosing diseases in gastroenterology, pulmonology, urology, and other fields. To accurately diagnose diseases, sample biopsies are indispensable and are currently considered the gold standard. However, random 4-quadrant biopsies have sampling errors and time delays. To provide intraoperative real-time microscopic images of suspicious lesions, microscopic endoscopy for in vivo optical biopsy has been developed, including endocytoscopy and confocal laser endomicroscopy. This article reviews recent advances in technology and clinical applications, as well as their shortcomings and future directions.

Confocal laser endomicroscopy in gastro-intestinal endoscopy: technical aspects and clinical applications

Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) is an advanced endoscopic imaging technology that provides a magnified, cellular level view of gastrointestinal epithelia. In conjunction with topical or intravenous fluorescent dyes, CLE allows for an "optical biopsy" for real-time diagnosis. Two different CLE system have been used in clinical endoscopy, probe-based CLE (pCLE) and endoscope-based CLE (eCLE). Using pCLE, the device can be delivered: (I) into the luminal gastrointestinal tract through the working channel of standard endoscopes; (II) into extraluminal cystic and solid parenchymal lesions through an endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) needle; or (III) into the biliary system through an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) accessory channel. With eCLE, the probe is directly integrated into the tip of a conventional endoscope, however, these endoscopes are no longer commercially available. CLE has moderate to high diagnostic accuracy for neoplastic and inflammatory conditions through the gastrointestinal tract including: oesophageal, gastric and colonic neoplasia, pancreatic cysts and solid lesions, malignant pancreatobiliary strictures and inflammatory bowel disease. Some studies have demonstrated the diagnostic benefit of CLE imaging when combined with either conventional white light endoscopy or advanced imaging technologies. Therefore, optical biopsies using CLE can resolve diagnostic dilemmas in some cases where conventional imaging fails to achieve conclusive results. CLE could also reduce the requirement for extensive tissue sampling during surveillance procedures. In the future, CLE in combination with molecular probes, could allow for the molecular characterization of diseases and assess response to targeted therapy. However, the narrow field of view, high capital costs and specialized operator training requirements remain the main limitations. Future multi-center, randomized trials with a focus on conventional diagnostic applications, cost-effectiveness and standardized training will be required for definitive evidence. The objective of this review is to evaluate the technical aspects and current applications of CLE in patients with gastrointestinal and pancreatobiliary diseases and discuss future directions for this technique.

SAGES TAVAC safety and efficacy analysis confocal laser endomicroscopy

BACKGROUND

Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) is a novel endoscopic adjunct that allows real-time in vivo histological examination of mucosal surfaces. By using intravenous or topical fluorescent agents, CLE highlights certain mucosal elements that facilitate an optical biopsy in real time. CLE technology has been used in different organ systems including the gastrointestinal tract. There has been numerous studies evaluating this technology in gastrointestinal endoscopy, our aim was to evaluate the safety, value, and efficacy of this technology in the gastrointestinal tract.

METHODS

The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Technology and Value Assessment Committee (TAVAC) performed a PubMed/Medline database search of clinical studies involving CLE in May of 2018. The literature search used combinations of the keywords: confocal laser endomicroscopy, pCLE, Cellvizio, in vivo microscopy, optical histology, advanced endoscopic imaging, and optical diagnosis. Bibliographies of key references were searched for relevant studies not covered by the PubMed search. Case reports and small case series were excluded. The manufacturer's website was also used to identify key references. The United States Food and Drug Administration (U.S. FDA) Manufacturer And User facility and Device Experience (MAUDE) database was searched for reports regarding the device malfunction or injuries.

RESULTS

The technology offers an excellent safety profile with rare adverse events related to the use of fluorescent agents. It has been shown to increase the detection of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus, gastric intraepithelial neoplasia/early gastric cancer, and dysplasia associated with inflammatory bowel disease when compared to standard screening protocols. It also aids in the differentiation and classification of colorectal polyps, indeterminate biliary strictures, and pancreatic cystic lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

CLE has an excellent safety profile. CLE can increase the diagnostic accuracy in a number of gastrointestinal pathologies.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions: Feasibility study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE) allows for real-time optical biopsies during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). Little is known about nCLE imaging of gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions (GI-SEL); therefore, we determined its feasibility.

METHODS

We carried out EUS, nCLE, and finally FNA in 25 patients with GI-SEL between November 2015 and December 2018. We retrospectively compared nCLE findings with pathological findings of EUS-FNA or surgical specimens. For concordance analysis, two endoscopists independently validated representative nCLE images 5 months or more after examinations.

RESULTS

Adequate sample acquisition rate of EUS-FNA was 67% per needle pass and 96% per patient. EUS-FNA was diagnostic in 80% (20/25), suspicious in 4% (1/25), and nondiagnostic in 16% (4/25). nCLE image acquisition rate was 100% and its concordance rate with final pathology was 88% (22/25), which was not significantly different from diagnostic and suspicious EUS-FNA. nCLE could differentiate GI stromal tumors (GISTs) from leiomyoma, in that GISTs were characterized by contrast-enhanced densely populated spindle cell tumors with unenhanced rod-shaped nuclei in 93% of 14 patients, whereas leiomyomas were characterized by narrower spindle cell tumors with fewer and smaller unenhanced nuclei in 100% of three patients. In rectal metastasis from lung adenocarcinoma, some pleomorphic dark nests were observed. At concordance analysis between the two endoscopists' validation results, κ value was 0.560 (P < 0.001), indicating moderate agreement. There were no adverse events associated with nCLE and EUS-FNA.

CONCLUSION

Needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy can be safe and useful for on-site detection of abnormalities of GI-SEL (UMIN 000013857).

Advanced endoscopic methods in gastrointestinal diseases: a systematic review

Endoscopic imaging is the main method for detecting gastrointestinal diseases, which adversely affect human health. White light endoscopy (WLE) was the first method used for endoscopic examination and is still the preliminary step in the detection of gastrointestinal diseases during clinical examination. However, it cannot accurately diagnose gastrointestinal diseases owing to its poor correlation with histopathological diagnosis. In recent years, many advanced endoscopic methods have emerged to improve the detection accuracy by endoscopy. Chromoendoscopy (CE) enhances the contrast between normal and diseased tissues using biocompatible dye agents. Narrow band imaging (NBI) can improve the contrast between capillaries and submucosal vessels by changing the light source acting on the tissue using special filters to realize the visualization of the vascular structure. Flexible spectral imaging color enhancement (FICE) technique uses the reflectance spectrum estimation technique to obtain individual spectral images and reconstructs an enhanced image of the mucosal surface using three selected spectral images. The i-Scan technology takes advantage of the different reflective properties of normal and diseased tissues to obtain images, and enhances image contrast through post-processing algorithms. These abovementioned methods can be used to detect gastrointestinal diseases by observing the macroscopic structure of the digestive tract mucosa, but the ability of early cancer detection is limited with low resolution. However, based on the principle of confocal imaging, probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) can enable cellular visualization with high-performance probes, which can present cellular morphology that is highly consistent with that shown by biopsy to provide the possibility of early detection of cancer. Other endoscopic imaging techniques including endoscopic optical coherence tomography (EOCT) and photoacoustic endoscopy (PAE), are also promising for diagnosing gastrointestinal diseases. This review focuses on these technologies and aims to provide an overview of different technologies and their clinical applicability.

Small bowel ulcers: when is it not inflammatory bowel disease ?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Increasing use of small bowel endoscopy unravels ulcers in a relevant number of patients. Although often attributed to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), these ulcers may be unspecific or caused by a variety of other diseases. This review summarizes the recent literature related to differential diagnosis of small bowel ulcers.

RECENT FINDINGS

NSAID enteropathy is the major differential diagnosis to IBD in patients with small bowel ulcers. Intestinal tuberculosis must be considered in patients at risk. Rare causes for small bowel ulcers are autoinflammatory, neoplastic, vascular diseases, or nontuberculous infections. Morphology of small bowel ulcers cannot provide a reliable differentiation, and even histology is not specific in all cases. History with special focus on NSAID medication and clinical symptoms not typical for IBD, laboratory tests in the search of systemic disease, and microbiologic testing of biopsies can be helpful. Genetic testing allows identification of few rare entities like defects in prostaglandin metabolism.

SUMMARY

Due to a massive overlap in the endoscopic appearance of small bowel ulcers between possible causes, diagnosis should be based on broad information also including history, histology, imaging, and laboratory tests.