Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial cancer of the cervical esophagus

More efficient endoscopic submucosal dissection with deep endotracheal intubation for superficial cervical esophageal carcinoma: a dual-center, prospective, randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Deep endotracheal intubation (DET) has been proposed to improve cervical esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) because of the limited space and visibility. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DET.

METHODS

In the current dual-center trial, patients were randomized into DET or conventional endotracheal intubation (CET) groups. Complete resection rate, operation time, and adverse events were measured and compared.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients (60 lesions) were assigned to the groups, showing comparable baseline characteristics. The complete resection rates were similarly high in both groups. However, DET significantly reduced ESD operation time (52.2 minutes vs 71.1 minutes, P < .001) and postoperative pain scores (3.1 vs 4.7, P < .01). Severe stenosis occurred more frequently in the CET patients (20% vs 0%, P = .035). No significant differences were observed in other adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

DET can overcome technical challenges to improve therapeutic efficiency and safety. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT06420258.).

Effectiveness of glucocorticoids in preventing esophageal stricture and predictors of stricture after esophageal ESD: 5 years of experience in a single medical center

Background

Esophageal stricture is one of the major complications after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of the esophagus. However, even with steroid prophylaxis, stenosis still occurs in up to 45% of patients. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of steroid therapy in preventing esophageal strictures after ESD, as well as to assess the predictors of esophageal strictures after the application of steroids.

Methods

Between February 2018 and March 2023, 207 patients who underwent esophageal ESD at Southeast University Affiliated Zhongda Hospital were retrospectively enrolled. We evaluated stenosis rate, number of endoscopic dilations after ESD, the interval between the first endoscopic dilatation after ESD and explored risk factors for strictures after steroid prophylaxis.

Results

In the control group, the oral steroids group, and the combined group, the stenosis rates were 83/87 (95.4%), 44/53 (83.0%), and 56/67 (83.6%), respectively; the number of endoscopic dilations were 3.43 (±2.22), 2.34 (±2.17), and 1.52 (±1.25), respectively; the time intervals between first endoscopic dilation and ESD procedure were 38.36 (±6.87), 68.18 (±9.49), and 96.82 (±8.41) days, respectively; all these indicators were significantly better in the oral and combined groups than in the control group (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis identified lesion circumference ≥ 5/6th and submucosal injection of solution were two independent factors on esophageal stricture formation (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Steroid prophylaxis is effective and safe in preventing esophageal stenosis. Moreover, lesion circumference and submucosal injection of sodium hyaluronate were two independent factors on esophageal stricture formation even with steroids administration.

Risk of stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection in the cervical esophagus and efficacy of local steroid injection for stricture prevention (with video)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

There is a high incidence of stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for cervical esophageal cancer. We aimed to elucidate the risk factors for stricture and to evaluate the efficacy of steroid injection for stricture prevention in the cervical esophagus.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 100 patients who underwent ESD for cervical esophageal cancer to (1) identify the factors associated with stricture among patients who did not receive steroid injection, and (2) compare the incidence of stricture between patients with and without steroid injection.

RESULTS

Among 48 patients who did not receive steroid injection, there were significant differences in tumor size (P = .026), resection time (P = .028), and circumferential extent of the mucosal defect (P = .005) between patients with stricture (n = 5) and without stricture (n = 43). Compared with patients without steroid injection, patients with steroid injection had a significantly lower incidence of stricture when the post-ESD mucosal defect was <3/4 and ≥1/2 (40% versus 8%; P = .039). For the patients with a post-ESD mucosal defect of ≥3/4 (n = 13), local steroid injection was performed for all of them, and 6 (46%) developed stricture.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who underwent ≥1/2 circumferential resection were at high risk of cervical esophageal stricture. Steroid injection had a stricture prevention effect in patients with <3/4 and ≥1/2 circumferential resection, but seemed to be insufficient in preventing stricture in patients with ≥3/4 circumferential resection.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal cancer in the remnant esophagus after esophagectomy

Treatment of esophageal cancer in the remnant esophagus after esophagectomy is highly invasive, therefore, early detection and minimally invasive treatment are considered necessary. Consequently, we aimed to clarify the safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for residual esophageal cancer compared to that for esophageal cancer in a normal cervical esophagus. This study involved 47 patients with 59 residual esophageal cancers and 92 patients with 107 cervical esophageal cancers in normal esophagus who underwent ESD between January 2008 and December 2023. Their clinicopathological findings and long-term outcomes were retrospectively collected and evaluated. The median tumor diameter was 13 mm, and the median procedure time was 31 minutes in remnant esophagus group, with no significant difference between the two groups. No serious complications such as perforation, massive intraoperative bleeding, and pneumonia were observed in the remnant group, except for one case of postoperative bleeding. The rates of complete resection and disease specific survival were not significantly different between two groups, with complete resection rate of 86.4% and 5-year disease-specific survival rate of 95.7% in the remnant esophagus group. No local recurrence was observed during the median observation period of 43 months in the remnant esophagus group. ESD for superficial cancer of the remnant esophagus showed a high complete resection rate without serious complications and good local-regional control with no evidence of local recurrence. This indicates that ESD is a safe and useful treatment for superficial cancer of the remnant esophagus.

Predictors of stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection of the esophagus and steroids application

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a reliable method to resect early esophageal cancer. Esophageal stricture is one of the major complications after ESD of the esophagus. Steroid prophylaxis for esophageal strictures, particularly local injection of triamcinolone acetonide (TA), is a relatively effective method to prevent esophageal strictures. However, even with steroid prophylaxis, stenosis still occurs in up to 45% of patients. Predicting the risk of stenosis formation after local TA injection would enable additional interventions in risky patients.

AIM

To identify the predictors of esophageal strictures after steroids application.

METHODS

Patients who underwent esophageal ESD and steroid prophylaxis and who were comprehensively assessed for lesion- and ESD-related factors at Southeast University Affiliated Zhongda Hospital between February 2018 and March 2023 were included in the study. The univariate and multivariate regression analyses were conducted to identify the predictors of stricture among patients undergoing steroid prophylaxis.

RESULTS

A total of 120 patients were included in the analysis. In the oral prednisone and oral prednisone combined with local tretinoin injection groups, the stenosis rates were 44/53 (83.0%) and 56/67 (83.6%), respectively. Among them, univariate analysis showed that the lesion circumference (P = 0.01) and submucosal injection solution (P = 0.04) showed significant correlation with the risk of stenosis formation. Logistic regression analyses were then performed using predictors that were significant in the univariate analyses and combined with known predictors from previous reports, such as additional chemoradiotherapy and tumor location. We identified a lesion circumference < 5/6 (OR = 0.19; P = 0.02) and submucosal injection of sodium hyaluronate (OR = 0.15; P = 0.03) as independent predictors of on esophageal stricture formation.

CONCLUSION

Steroid prophylaxis effectively prevents stenosis. Moreover, the lesion circumference and submucosal injection of sodium hyaluronate were independent predictors of esophageal strictures. Additional interventions should be considered in high-risk patients.

Usefulness of an ultrathin endoscope in esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection

Background and study aims Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is sometimes challenging because of stenosis and scarring. We examined the use of an ultrathin endoscope for esophageal ESD, which is difficult using conventional endoscopes. Patients and methods A designated transparent hood and ESD knife for ultrathin endoscopes have been developed and clinically introduced. Esophageal ESD was performed on 303 lesions in 220 patients in our hospital from February 2021 to February 2023. Of them, an ultrathin endoscope was used on 26 lesions in 23 cases. The safety and utility of an ultrathin endoscope in esophageal ESD were retrospectively verified. Results All 26 lesions were resected en bloc, and serious complications such as perforation, massive bleeding, or pneumonia, were not observed. Lesions were found on the anal side of the stenosis and over the scarring in 38.6% (10/26) and 50% (13/26) of participants, respectively. Moreover, 46.2% of participants (12/26) had lesions on the cervical esophagus. The total procedure time was 64.1 ± 37.7 minutes, but the average time from oral incision to pocket creation was 121.2 ± 109.9 seconds. Conclusions Ultrathin endoscopes may be useful for difficult esophageal ESD.

Long-Term Outcomes of Esophageal Squamous Neoplasia with Muscularis Mucosa Involvement after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Ambiguity exists over treatment and surveillance strategies after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for esophageal squamous cell neoplasia (ESCN) with unfavorable histologic features. This study investigated the long-term outcomes of ESD in high-risk ESCN patients. We retrospectively included early ESCN patients treated with ESD at two medical centers in Taiwan between August 2010 and December 2023. Demographic, endoscopic and pathological data were collected. Among 146 patients (mean age 59.17 years) with 183 lesions, 73 (50%) had a history of head and neck cancer (HNC). En bloc and R0 resections were achieved in 100% and 95.6% of the lesions, respectively. The 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and local recurrence rates were 42.7%, 94.7% and 11%. R0 resections were significantly associated with recurrence in a univariate analysis (HR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.06-0.66, p = 0.008). Alcohol abstinence was independently associated with lower recurrence (HR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.16-0.73, p = 0.006). Patients with pT1a-MM (muscularis mucosa invasion) had comparable OS (p = 0.82), DSS (p = 0.617) and recurrence (p = 0.63) rates to those with pT1a-EP/LPM (epithelium/lamina propria invasion). The long-term outcomes of ESCN patients after ESD for expanded indications were satisfactory. ESD could be considered in selected ESCN patients involving the muscularis mucosa, notably among high-risk HNC patients.

Repeated steroid injection and polyglycolic acid shielding for prevention of refractory esophageal stricture

BACKGROUND

Postoperative stricture and refractory stricture are severe adverse events which occur after expansive esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of steroid injection, polyglycolic acid (PGA) shielding, and of additional steroid injection thereafter for the prevention of refractory esophageal stricture.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of 816 consecutive cases of esophageal ESD performed between 2002 and 2021 at the University of Tokyo Hospital. After 2013, all patients with a diagnosis of superficial esophageal carcinoma covering over 1/2 the esophageal circumference underwent preventive treatment immediately after ESD with either "PGA shielding", "steroid injection", or "steroid injection + PGA shielding". Additional steroid injection was performed for high-risk patients after 2019.

RESULTS

The risk of refractory stricture was especially high in the cervical esophagus (OR 24.77, p = 0.002) and after total circumferential resection (OR 894.04, p < 0.001). "Steroid injection + PGA shielding" was the only method significantly effective in preventing stricture occurrence (OR 0.36; 95% CI 0.15-0.83, p = 0.012). This method also decreased the risk of refractory stricture (OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.10-1.28, p = 0.096), but additional steroid injection was the only significantly effective method for prevention of refractory stricture (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.14-0.98, p = 0.029).

CONCLUSION

Combining steroid injection and PGA shielding is effective for preventing post-ESD stricture and refractory stricture. Additional steroid injection is a viable option for patients at high-risk for refractory stricture.

Predictors of stricture after non-circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection of the esophagus and single-dose triamcinolone injection immediately after the procedure

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Local triamcinolone (TA) injection is widely used to prevent stricture formation after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). However, stricture develops in up to 45% of patients despite this prophylactic measure. We therefore conducted a single-center prospective study to identify predictors of stricture after esophageal ESD and local TA injection.

METHODS

Patients who underwent esophageal ESD and local TA injection and who were comprehensively assessed for lesion- and ESD-related factors were included in the study. Multivariate analyses were conducted to identify the predictors of stricture.

RESULTS

A total of 203 patients were included in the analysis. Multivariate analysis identified residual mucosal width ≤5 mm (odds ratio [OR], 29.0; P < .0001) or 6 to 10 mm (OR, 3.7; P = .04), history of chemoradiotherapy (OR, 5.1; P = .045), and tumor in the cervical or upper thoracic esophagus (OR, 3.8; P = .018) as independent predictors of stricture. Based on the ORs of the predictors, patients were stratified into 2 groups according to stricture risk: patients in the high-risk group (residual mucosal width ≤5 mm or 6-10 mm with another predictor) had a stricture rate of 52.5% (31 of 59 cases), and patients in the low-risk group (residual mucosal width ≥11 mm or 6-10 mm without other predictors) had a stricture rate of 6.3% (9 of 144 cases).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified predictors of stricture after ESD and local TA injection. Local TA injection prevented stricture formation after ESD in low-risk patients but was not sufficient to prevent stricture in high-risk patients. Additional interventions should thus be considered in high-risk patients. (University Hospital Medical Network Clinical Trials Registry number: UMIN 000028894.).

Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in Japanese patients with cervical esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Cervical esophageal cancer (CEC) carries a poor prognosis; however, due to its low incidence, optimal treatment for CEC remains to be established. The purpose of this study was to clarify the current status of treatment of CEC in Japan and obtain evidence for establishing the appropriate treatment method.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We asked specialist training facilities accredited by the Japanese Broncho-Esophageal Society to register data on CEC cases that received curative treatment from January 2009 to December 2014, and conducted a retrospective review of the clinical data of 302 cases registered from 27 facilities.

RESULTS

In regard to the initial therapy, of the 302 patients, 33 had undergone endoscopic resection, 41 had undergone surgery, 67 had received induction chemotherapy (IC), and 143 had received chemoradiotherapy (CRT). There were no significant differences in the 5-year overall survival rates among the patient groups that had received surgery, IC or CRT as the initial treatment; advanced stage and recurrent nerve invasion were identified as independent poor prognostic factors. Among the patients who had received IC or CRT as laryngeal-preserving surgery was not indicated at the time of the initial diagnosis, the functional laryngeal preservation rate at the end of the observation period was 34.8%.

CONCLUSION

Even in patients with advanced CEC, there is the possibility of preserving the larynx by adopting IC or CRT. However, if the laryngeal function cannot be preserved, there is a risk of complications from aspiration pneumonia, so that the choice of treatment should be made carefully.

Effects of steroid use for stenosis prevention after endoscopic submucosal dissection for cervical esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Esophageal stenosis is a serious complication after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for thoracic esophageal cancer (TEC), and steroid has been applied for stenosis prevention. However, the rate of stenosis and effect of steroid for ESD of cervical esophageal cancer (CEC) remain unknown. The aim was to clarify the rate and managements of post-ESD stenosis for CEC.

METHODS

A total of 325 lesions with 272 patients who underwent ESD for esophageal cancers were enrolled and were divided to the CEC group (43 lesions) or the TEC group (282 lesions). Patient characteristics, clinicopathological features, procedure-related outcomes of esophageal ESD, stenosis rate and clinical outcome of steroid use cases were evaluated.

RESULTS

More patients in the CEC group received preventive steroid treatment compared to the TEC group (37.2% vs 14.5%, P = 0.001). The rate of post-ESD stenosis tended to be higher in the CEC group (11.6%) than in the TEC group (6.7%). For cases of 3/4 ≤ of circumference, local injection with oral steroid had lower stenosis rate than local injection only in both groups (CEC 40% vs 100%, TEC 30.7% vs 56.3%). More sessions and longer duration of dilation were needed to release the stenosis in the CEC group (20 times vs. 5 times, P = 0.015; 196 days vs. 55 days, P = 0.043).

CONCLUSION

The post-ESD stenosis rate of CEC tended to be higher than that of TEC. More intensive preventive measures for post-ESD stenosis may be needed for CEC than TEC.

Temporal changes and risk factors for esophageal stenosis after salvage radiotherapy in superficial esophageal cancer following non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Radiotherapy (RT) has recently received increasing attention as an additional treatment for organ preservation after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in patients with superficial esophageal cancer. Esophageal stenosis is an adverse event related to RT after ESD that is not widely studied. The aim of this study was to investigate esophageal stenosis related to salvage RT in superficial esophageal cancer after non-curative ESD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty patients who received salvage RT after non-curative ESD at a single institution between 2011 and 2018 were included in this study. The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0, was used to assess esophageal stenosis. Data were compared using Fisher's exact test. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Median follow-up time was 48 months (range, 12-95 months). Grade 2 and 3 esophageal stenosis were observed in 17 (34%), and 3 patients (6%), respectively. The frequency of grade 2 or worse esophageal stenosis decreased over time (before RT, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after RT: 16 (32%), 13 (26%), 10 (20%), and 6 (12%) patients, respectively). Only one patient required endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) 1 year after RT. All grade 3 esophageal stenosis improved grade 2 or less by EBD. In univariate analysis, only tumor location was a significant risk factor for grade 3 esophageal stenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal stenosis, after salvage RT in patients with esophageal cancer who received non-curative ESD, improved naturally or after EBD; only a few cases required long-term EBD.

Novel hybrid endoscopy-assisted larynx-preserving esophagectomy for cervical esophageal cancer (with video)

Hybrid endoscopy-assisted larynx-preserving esophagectomy is developed for cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma encroaching or extending above the upper esophageal sphincter. First, a cervical incision was surgically performed followed by cervical lymph node dissection. Second, the margin of cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma was endoscopically identified with iodine staining and marked endoscopically followed by semi-circumferential or circumferential endoscopic full-thickness excision around the lumen of the esophagus. The distal margin was surgically resected and reconstruction was performed. Among six consecutive patients with cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing hybrid endoscopy-assisted larynx-preserving esophagectomy, proximal surgical margin was histologically negative in five patients. During a median follow-up period of 15.5 months, all patients tolerated oral intake and were alive without evidence of recurrence. None of the patients experienced aspiration pneumonia, vocal disorder or postoperative anastomotic stricture. Hybrid endoscopy-assisted larynx-preserving esophagectomy could be a clinically feasible treatment for cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma providing accurate proximal resection margin with the benefit of laryngeal function preservation.

Steroid injection and polyglycolic acid shielding to prevent stricture after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a retrospective comparative analysis (with video)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Postoperative stricture after expansive esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a severe adverse event. Previous single-arm reports have suggested that polyglycolic acid (PGA) shielding may prevent stricture. This study was performed to assess the efficacy of this method through a comparative analysis.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of 500 consecutive cases of esophageal ESD performed between 2002 and 2018 at the University of Tokyo Hospital. After 2013, patients with a diagnosis of superficial esophageal carcinoma covering more than half of the esophageal circumference underwent preventive treatment with either PGA shielding or steroid injection + PGA shielding after ESD. The efficacy of these methods for preventing post-ESD stricture was assessed through multivariable logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The risk of postoperative stricture was especially high in the cervical esophagus (odds ratio [OR], 4.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-61.09) and after total circumferential resection (OR, 3.58×103; lower bound of 95% CI, >185). Steroid injection + PGA shielding was the only method significantly effective in preventing stricture (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.10-0.78; P = .009). In the relatively low-risk subgroup (excluding cervical esophageal cancer and complete circumferential resection), the postoperative stricture rates for steroid injection + PGA shielding versus PGA shielding versus control were 18.9% versus 41.4% versus 51.7%, respectively (P = .015). However, the efficacy of this was limited in extremely high-risk cases.

CONCLUSION

The combination of steroid injection and PGA shielding is effective for preventing post-ESD stricture. There is a need for even more effective methods for cervical esophageal cancer and complete circumferential resection.

Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and comparison to surgery for superficial esophageal squamous cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for superficial esophageal squamous cancer.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using PubMed, ProQuest and Cochrane Library databases. Primary outcomes were overall survival, disease-specific survival and recurrence-free survival at 5 years. Secondary outcomes included adverse events, recurrence and metastasis. Hazard ratios were calculated based on time to events for survival analysis, and odds radios were used to compare discrete variables.

RESULTS

A total of 3796 patients in 21 retrospective studies, including 5 comparative studies for ESD and esophagectomy were enrolled. The invasion depth was 52.0% for M1-M2, 43.2% for M3-SM1 and 4.7% for SM2 or deeper. The 5-year survival rate was: overall survival 87.3%, disease-specific survival 97.7%, and recurrence-free survival 85.1%, respectively. Pooled local recurrence of ESD was 1.8% and metastasis was 3.3%. In terms of the comparison between ESD and esophagectomy, there was no difference in the overall survival (86.4% versus 81.8%, hazard ratio = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.39-1.11) as well as disease-specific and recurrence-free survival. In addition, ESD was associated with fewer adverse events (19.8 % versus 44.0%, odds ratio = 0.3, 95% CI = 0.23-0.39).

CONCLUSIONS

For superficial esophageal squamous cancer, ESD may be considered as the primary treatment of for mucosal lesions, and additional treatment should be available for submucosal invasive cancers.

Low-density lipoprotein receptor expression is involved in the beneficial effect of photodynamic therapy using talaporfin sodium on gastric cancer cells

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a therapeutic method used to destroy tumor tissue via reactive oxygen. Notably, reactive oxygen is induced by a combination of photosensitizers, including talaporfin sodium (TS) and laser light. Gastric cancer cell lines, MKN45 and MKN74, were used to evaluate the effect of TS-PDT in vitro. The antitumor effect of TS-PDT, which was evaluated via cellular viability assay, on MKN74 was weaker than that on MKN45 cells, suggesting that MKN74 cell could be resistant to TS-PDT. However, using a higher TS concentration or setting a longer treatment time (24 h) resulted in effective TS-PDT treatment on MKN74 cells. In addition, when irradiation power of LED was raised up to 5.06 J/cm2, TS-PDT was able to induce an antitumor effect on MKN74 cells. This suggested that the difference in TS-PDT efficacy between MKN45 and MKN74 cells is based on the difference in cellular uptake of TS. As expected, uptake of TS by MKN74 cells was lower than that by MKN45 cells. The expression levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor in MKN74 cells were lower than those in MKN45 cells. With GW3965 treatment, an agonist/activator of Liver X Receptor, LDL receptor expression was reduced, weakening the TS-PDT effect. Furthermore, as a hydroxymethylglutaryl-Coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, treatment using simvastatin increased LDL receptor expression, leading to enhancement of the TS-PDT effect on MKN74 cells. In conclusion, the difference in LDL receptor expression between the two gastric cell lines could influence TS-PDT efficacy; simvastatin may enhance the antitumor effect of TS-PDT through upregulating the LDL receptor even on PDT-resistant gastric cancer cells.