Monogenic Diabetes Not Caused By Mutations in Mody Genes: A Very Heterogenous Group of Diabetes

High Frequency of Recessive WFS1 Mutations Among Indian Children With Islet Antibody-negative Type 1 Diabetes

BACKGROUND

While the frequency of islet antibody-negative (idiopathic) type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is reported to be increased in Indian children, its aetiology has not been studied. We investigated the role of monogenic diabetes in the causation of islet antibody-negative T1DM.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, prospective, observational study of 169 Indian children (age 1-18 years) with recent-onset T1DM. All were tested for antibodies against GAD65, islet antigen-2, and zinc transporter 8 using validated ELISA. Thirty-four islet antibody-negative children underwent targeted next-generation sequencing for 31 genes implicated in monogenic diabetes using the Illumina platform. All mutations were confirmed by Sanger sequencing.

RESULTS

Thirty-five (21%) children were negative for all islet antibodies. Twelve patients (7% of entire cohort, 34% of patients with islet antibody-negative T1DM) were detected to have pathogenic or likely pathogenic genetic variants. The most frequently affected locus was WFS1, with 9 patients (5% of entire cohort, 26% of islet antibody-negative). These included 7 children with homozygous and 1 patient each with a compound heterozygous and heterozygous mutation. Children with Wolfram syndrome 1 (WS) presented with severe insulin-requiring diabetes (including 3 patients with ketoacidosis), but other syndromic manifestations were not detected. In 3 patients, heterozygous mutations in HNF4A, ABCC8, and PTF1A loci were detected.

CONCLUSION

Nearly one-quarter of Indian children with islet antibody-negative T1DM had recessive mutations in the WFS1 gene. These patients did not exhibit other features of WS at the time of diagnosis. Testing for monogenic diabetes, especially WS, should be considered in Indian children with antibody-negative T1DM.

Wolfram syndrome type 1: a case series

BACKGROUND

Wolfram syndrome (WS) is a rare autosomal recessive multisystem neurodegenerative disease characterized by non-autoimmune insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, optic atrophy, sensorineural deafness, and diabetes as the main features. Owing to clinical phenotypic heterogeneity, the misdiagnosis rate is high. However, early accurate diagnosis and comprehensive management are key to improving quality of life and prolonging life.

RESULTS

Eleven patients from seven WS pedigrees with 10 mutation sites (c.1314_1317delCTTT, c.C529T, c.C529A, c.G2105A, c.C1885T, c.1859_1860del, c.G2020A, c.C529A, c.G2105A, and c.G1393C) in the WFS1 gene were included. We conducted further expert department analysis to clarify the diagnosis and analyze the correlation between genes and phenotypes.

CONCLUSIONS

The genotypes of these patients were closely associated with their phenotypes. The clinical data of the patients were analyzed to provide a basis for the diagnosis and clinical management of the disease.

Monogenic diabetes

Monogenic diabetes includes several clinical conditions generally characterized by early-onset diabetes, such as neonatal diabetes, maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) and various diabetes-associated syndromes. However, patients with apparent type 2 diabetes mellitus may actually have monogenic diabetes. Indeed, the same monogenic diabetes gene can contribute to different forms of diabetes with early or late onset, depending on the functional impact of the variant, and the same pathogenic variant can produce variable diabetes phenotypes, even in the same family. Monogenic diabetes is mostly caused by impaired function or development of pancreatic islets, with defective insulin secretion in the absence of obesity. The most prevalent form of monogenic diabetes is MODY, which may account for 0.5-5% of patients diagnosed with non-autoimmune diabetes but is probably underdiagnosed owing to insufficient genetic testing. Most patients with neonatal diabetes or MODY have autosomal dominant diabetes. More than 40 subtypes of monogenic diabetes have been identified to date, the most prevalent being deficiencies of GCK and HNF1A. Precision medicine approaches (including specific treatments for hyperglycaemia, monitoring associated extra-pancreatic phenotypes and/or following up clinical trajectories, especially during pregnancy) are available for some forms of monogenic diabetes (including GCK- and HNF1A-diabetes) and increase patients' quality of life. Next-generation sequencing has made genetic diagnosis affordable, enabling effective genomic medicine in monogenic diabetes.

When do we need to suspect maturity onset diabetes of the young in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?

OBJECTIVE

Maturity onset diabetes of the young (MODY) patients have clinical heterogeneity as shown by many studies. Thus, often it is misdiagnosed to type 1 or type 2 diabetes(T2DM). The aim of this study is to evaluate MODY mutations in adult T2DM patients suspicious in terms of MODY, and to show clinical and laboratory differences between these two situations.

METHODS

In this study, we analyzed 72 type 2 diabetic patients and their relatives (35F/37M) who had been suspected for MODY and referred to genetic department for mutation analysis. The gene mutations for MODY have been assessed in the laboratory of Marmara University genetics. Totally 67 (32F/35M; median age 36.1) diabetic patients were analyzed for 7 MODY mutations. Twelve patients who have uncertain mutation (VUS) were excluded from study for further evaluation. MODY(+) (n:30) patients and T2DM patients (n:25) were compared for clinical and laboratory parameters.

RESULTS

In MODY(+) subjects, mutations in GCK (MODY 2) (n:12; 40%) were the most common followed by HNF4A (MODY 1) (n:4; 13.3%). Diabetes diagnosis age was younger in MODY(+) group but not statistically significant. Sixty-six percent of MODY(+) subjects had diabetes history at 3-consecutive generations in their family compared with 28% of T2DM patients statistically significant (p:0.006). Gender, BMI, C-peptide, HbA1c, lipid parameters, creatinine, GFR, microalbuminuria, vitamin D and calcium were not statistically different between the groups.

CONCLUSION

According to present study results, MODY mutation positivity is most probable in young autoantibody (-) diabetic patients diagnosed before 30 years of age, who have first degree family history of diabetes.

Clinical and laboratory clues of maturity-onset diabetes of the young and determination of association with molecular diagnosis

BACKGROUND/AIM

Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) is often misdiagnosed as other types of diabetes because it is overlooked due to atypical clinical presentations. This study aims to reveal the clinical and laboratory clues and examine their compatibility with MODY genotypes.

METHODS

Participants consisted of 230 children with atypical presentations for type1(T1DM) and type2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). MODY-causing mutations were screened in the following genes:GCK-HNF1A-HNF4A-HNF1B-PDX1-NEUROD1-KLF11-CEL-PAX4-INS-BLK. Clinical and laboratory features were compared between children with MODY and children without MODY.

RESULTS

The most common reasons for MODY screening were as follows (n/%):low daily dose of insulin (DDI) requirement (122/53%), absence of beta-cell antibodies(58/25.3%), coincidental hyperglycemia(26/11.3%), family history of diabetes (12/5.2%), hypoglycemia/hyperglycemia episodes(7/3%), hyperglycemia related to steroids(3/1.4%) and renal glycosuria(2/0.8%). The markers with the most likelihood to distinguish MODY from T1DM were determined as follows: measurable C-peptide in follow-up, family history of early-onset diabetes and low DDI requirement (odds ratio:12.55, 5.53 and 3.43, respectively). The distribution of the most common causative genes in children with MODY(n = 24) is as follows (n/%):GCK(15/62.5%), HNF4A(7/29.1%), HNF1A(1/9.2%) and PDX1(1/9.2%).All children(n = 12) with GCK-MODY(MODY2) were screened for low DDI requirement, while beta-cell negativity was more common in HNF4A-MODY(MODY1).

CONCLUSION

The study shows that measurable C-peptide in follow-up, family history of early-onset diabetes, and low DDI are still remarkable clues to predict MODY in children with misdiagnosed T1DM. In addition, the most common mutations were found in the GCK and HNF4A genes. Among children misdiagnosed with T1DM, a low DDI requirement was found more frequently in MODY2, whereas beta-cell antibody negativity was more common in MODY1.

Clinical, Immunologic, and Molecular Spectrum of Patients with LPS-Responsive Beige-Like Anchor Protein Deficiency: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

LPS-responsive beige-like anchor protein (LRBA) deficiency is a primary immunodeficiency and immune dysregulation syndrome caused by biallelic mutations in the LRBA gene. These mutations usually abrogate the protein expression of LRBA, leading to a broad spectrum of clinical phenotypes including autoimmunity, chronic diarrhea, hypogammaglobulinemia, and recurrent infections.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to systematically collect all studies reporting on the clinical manifestations, molecular and laboratory findings, and management of patients with LRBA deficiency.

METHODS

We searched in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus without any restrictions on study design and publication time. A total of 109 LRBA-deficient cases were identified from 45 eligible articles. For all patients, demographic information, clinical records, and immunologic and molecular data were collected.

RESULTS

Of the patients with LRBA deficiency, 93 had homozygous and 16 had compound heterozygous mutations in LRBA. The most common clinical manifestations were autoimmunity (82%), enteropathy (63%), splenomegaly (57%), and pneumonia (49%). Reduction in numbers of CD4⁺ T cells and regulatory T cells as well as IgG levels was recorded for 21.6%, 65.6%, and 54.2% of evaluated patients, respectively. B-cell subpopulation analysis revealed low numbers of switched-memory and increased numbers of CD21^low B cells in 73.5% and 77.8% of patients, respectively. Eighteen (16%) patients underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation due to the severity of complications and the outcomes improved in 13 of them.

CONCLUSIONS

Autoimmune disorders are the main clinical manifestations of LRBA deficiency. Therefore, LRBA deficiency should be included in the list of monogenic autoimmune diseases, and screening for LRBA mutations should be routinely performed for patients with these conditions.

Monogenic diabetes: the impact of making the right diagnosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Monogenic forms of diabetes have received increased attention and genetic testing is more widely available; however, many patients are still misdiagnosed as having type 1 (T1D) or type 2 diabetes. This review will address updates to monogenic diabetes prevalence, identification, treatment, and genetic testing.

RECENT FINDINGS

The creation of a T1D genetic risk score and the use of noninvasive urinary C-peptide creatinine ratios have provided new tools to aid in the discrimination of possible monogenic diabetes from likely T1D. Early, high-dose sulfonylurea treatment in infants with a KCNJ11 or ABCC8 mutation continues to be well tolerated and effective. As the field moves towards more comprehensive genetic testing methods, there is an increased opportunity to identify novel genetic causes. Genetic testing results continue to allow for personalized treatment but should provide patient information at an appropriate health literacy level.

SUMMARY

Although there have been clinical and genetic advances in monogenic diabetes, patients are still misdiagnosed. Improved insurance coverage of genetic testing is needed. The majority of data on monogenic diabetes has been collected from Caucasian populations, therefore, research studies should endeavor to include broader ethnic and racial diversity to provide comprehensive information for all populations.

Bacille Calmette-Guerin Complications in Newly Described Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases: 2010-2017

Bacille Calmette–Guerin (BCG) vaccine is widely used as a prevention strategy against tuberculosis. BCG is a live vaccine, usually given early in life in most countries. While safe to most recipients, it poses a risk to immunocompromised patients. Several primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDD) have been classically associated with complications related to BCG vaccine. However, a number of new inborn errors of immunity have been described lately in which little is known about adverse reactions following BCG vaccination. The aim of this review is to summarize the existing data on BCG-related complications in patients diagnosed with PIDD described since 2010. When BCG vaccination status or complications were not specifically addressed in those manuscripts, we directly contacted the corresponding authors for further clarification. We also analyzed data on other mycobacterial infections in these patients. Based on our analysis, around 8% of patients with gain-of-function mutations in STAT1 had mycobacterial infections, including localized complications in 3 and disseminated disease in 4 out of 19 BCG-vaccinated patients. Localized BCG reactions were also frequent in activated PI3Kδ syndrome type 1 (3/10) and type 2 (2/18) vaccinated children. Also, of note, no BCG-related complications have been described in either CTLA4 or LRBA protein-deficient patients; and not enough information on BCG-vaccinated NFKB1 or NFKB2-deficient patients was available to drive any conclusions about these diseases. Despite the high prevalence of environmental mycobacterial infections in GATA2-deficient patients, only one case of BCG reaction has been reported in a patient who developed disseminated disease. In conclusion, BCG complications could be expected in some particular, recently described PIDD and it remains a preventable risk factor for pediatric PIDD patients.