Initial experience with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with T-fastener fixation in pediatric patients

Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy with T-Fasteners versus "Pull Technique": Analysis of Complications

INTRODUCTION

 The T-fasteners gastrostomy (T-PEG) has become increasingly popular over recent years as an alternative to the "pull-technique" gastrostomy (P-PEG). This study aimed to compare P-PEG and T-PEG complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 A retrospective observational study of pediatric patients who underwent percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement. P-PEG was performed using the standard Ponsky technique and was replaced after 6 months by a balloon gastrostomy under sedation. T-PEG was performed using three percutaneous T-fasteners (that allow a primary insertion of a balloon gastrostomy). The balloon was replaced by a new one after 6 months without sedation. Complications were recorded.

RESULTS

 In total, 146 patients underwent PEG placement, 70 P-PEG and 76 T-PEG. The mean follow-up was 3.9 years (standard deviation = 9.6). Age, weight, and associated comorbidities were comparable (p > 0.05). The overall complications were 17 (24.2%) in the P-PEG group and 16 (21.0%) in the T-PEG group (p > 0.05). P-PEG was associated with more sedation for button replacement (97 vs. 2.6% [p < 0.05]). P-PEG was associated with more early tube dislodgement during the first replacement (7.2 vs. 1.4% [p = 0.092]). Two of the five dislodged gastrostomies in the P-PEG group underwent laparotomy due to peritonitis, whereas the only dislodged gastrostomy in the T-PEG group was solved endoscopically. Altogether, P-PEG was associated with more complications that required urgent endoscopy, laparotomy, or laparoscopy (18.6 vs. 6.6% [p < 0.05]).

CONCLUSIONS

 P-PEG was associated with more sedation, complications during first button replacement, and complications requiring urgent endoscopy, laparotomy, or laparoscopy compared with T-PEG.

Retrospective study on safety and complications of direct percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children below 10 kg

image

Safety of a gastropexy device in infants and young children in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement

In our practice, there is a growing need to perform gastrostomy tube placement in infants and young children with feeding difficulties. To avoid possible complications arising from pull-through method (pull-through PEG) we began to perform a one-step endoscopic gastrostomy with a gastropexy device (push GT). This study aimed to evaluate the safety of this technique in infants and young children. In our study, 60 pull-through PEG and push GT procedures were retrospectively analysed in patients between 2.83 and 8.6 kg. We analysed the adverse events in both groups. Age, sex, weight, diagnosis, early (occurring ≤ 7 days after the procedure) and late (occurring > 7 days after the procedure) complications were compared in the two groups. Median follow-up duration was 12 months. Early minor complications occurred only in the push GT group, but this was not statistically significant. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding early major complications. Late minor complications were significantly more common in the push GT group. There were no late major complications in the push GT group, which is statistically significant. In infants and young children, push GT with a gastropexy device is a safe method to perform gastrostomy even in patients unsuitable for pull-through PEG placement.

Complications after pediatric percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: comparison of the push and pull technique

Purpose

Various complications are associated with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) procedures in children. The push technique is being increasingly used, but its complications are insufficiently characterized. We aimed to assess all complications related to PEG procedures and compare the safety of the pull and push techniques.

Methods

Retrospective review of consecutive pediatric patients who underwent PEG between 2002 and 2020.

Results

In total, 216 children underwent 217 PEG procedures. The push technique was used in 138 (64%) cases, and the pull technique in 79 (36%) cases. The median follow-up time was 6.1 (0.1-18.3) years. The complication rate was high (57%) and patients experienced complications years after the procedure. Overall, 51% and 67% of patients experienced complications in the push and pull groups, respectively. The rates of minor and major complications were higher in the pull group than in the push group (63% vs 48%, p=0.028; and 11% vs 6%, p=0.140, respectively). Reoperation was also more common in the pull group (17% vs 7%, p=0.020).

Conclusions

The overall complication rate of PEG procedures is high. Fortunately, most complications are mild and do not require reoperations. The increasing push technique appears to be safer than the traditional pull technique. Significant long-term morbidity is related to gastrostomies in children.

Safety of the One Step Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (Push-PEG) Button in Pediatric Patients

OBJECTIVES

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG)-systems are essential tools for enteral feeding in a broad variety of pediatric patients. The One Step ("Push-PEG") technique allows the direct introduction of a PEG-Button. The aim of the study was to investigate the safety and parental view of the Push-PEG technique.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective data and questionnaire (SDC, http://links.lww.com/MPG/D296 ) based study including all pediatric patients receiving a PEG via push or pull technique between 2015 until end of 2020 and compared these 2 groups. The primary outcome was the detection of minor and major complications. Secondary outcomes were growth, thriving, and parental contentment using a Likert-scaled questionnaire.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences in the basic data regarding age, weight, or diagnosis category. Overall complication rate was 34.9%. The Push-PEG group showed a lower rate of complications (32.7% vs 38.7%) and a lower rate of major complications (4.1% vs 8.8%), although the difference is not significant. Thirty-four families completed the questionnaire (SDC, http://links.lww.com/MPG/D296 ) (response rate 40%). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups regarding answers of the Likert-scaled questions.

CONCLUSION

Push-PEG placement seems to be as safe as placement via traditional pull technique, even in small infants more than 2.8 months and 4 kg. As Push-PEG placement requires less follow-up interventions it may show significant advantages and could be the method of first choice in many cases.

Advances and challenges of gastrostomy insertion in children

When oral feeding cannot provide adequate nutritional support to children, enteral tube feeding becomes a necessity. The overall aim is to ultimately promote appropriate growth, improve the patient's quality of life and increase carer satisfaction. Nasogastric tube feeding is considered appropriate on a short-term basis. Alternatively, gastrostomy feeding offers a more convenient and safer feeding option especially as it does not require frequent replacements, and carries a lower risk of complications. Gastrostomy tube feeding should be considered when nasogastric tube feeding is required for more than 2-3 wk as per the ESPEN guidelines on artificial enteral nutrition. Several techniques can be used to insert gastrostomies in children including endoscopic, image guided and surgical gastrostomy insertion whether open or laparoscopic. Each technique has its own advantages and disadvantages. The timing of gastrostomy insertion, device choice and method of insertion is dependent on the local expertise, patient requirements and family preference, and should be individualized with a multidisciplinary team approach. We aim to review gastrostomy insertion in children including indications, contraindications, history of gastrostomy, insertion techniques and complications.

Outcomes of laparoscopic gastrostomy in children with and without the use of a modified T-fastener technique

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic gastrostomy is commonly performed for durable enteral access in children. T-fasteners have been used intraoperatively to achieve a secure gastropexy, traditionally using external bolsters. We compare the safety profile of a modified paired T-fastener technique to standard laparoscopic-assisted suture gastropexy.

METHODS

A retrospective matched case-control study was performed of pediatric patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrostomy at a single center from 2015 to 2021. In the paired T-fastener group, pairs of T-fasteners were passed into the stomach in a square configuration, allowing the suture pairs to be tied subcutaneously. This cohort was matched in a 1:2 fashion with age, sex, and body mass index or weight-matched controls who underwent laparoscopic gastrostomy with buried transabdominal gastropexy.

RESULTS

Thirty patients underwent laparoscopic gastrostomy using the paired T-fastener technique and were matched to 60 controls. There was no significant difference in median operative time or 30-day complication rates between the groups, but the paired T-fastener technique significantly reduced the number of trocars required, and it was used for patients with thicker abdominal walls.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate the modified paired T-fastener technique as a safe, efficient means of gastropexy in pediatric laparoscopic gastrostomy. The paired T-fastener approach eliminates external bolsters, reduces additional trocars, and may be advantageous for thicker abdominal walls while maintaining a similar complication profile to standard laparoscopic gastrostomy.

Complications of Percutaneous and Surgical Gastrostomy Placements in Children: a Single-Centre Series

Gastrostomy placement is a standard procedure for children requiring enteral feeding for more than 3-6 weeks. Various techniques have been described (percutaneous endoscopic, laparoscopy, and laparotomy), and many complications have been reported. In our center, gastrostomy placement is performed either percutaneously by pediatric gastroenterologists, by laparoscopy/laparotomy by the visceral surgery team, or jointly, that is laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. This study aims to report all complications and identify risk factors and ways to prevent them.

Methods

This is a monocentric retrospective study including children younger than 18 years who underwent gastrostomy placement (percutaneous or surgical) between January 2012 and December 2020. Complications that occurred up to 1 year after placement were collected and classified according to their time of onset, degree of severity, and management. A univariate analysis was conducted to compare the groups and the occurrence of complications.

Results

We established a cohort of 124 children. Sixty-three (50.8%) presented a concomitant neurological disease. Fifty-nine patients (47.6%) underwent endoscopic placement, 59 (47.6%) surgical placement, and 6 (4.8%) laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Two hundred and two complications were described, including 29 (14.4%) major and 173 (85.6%) minor. Abdominal wall abscess and cellulitis were reported 13 times. Patients who underwent surgical placement presented more complications (major and minor combined) with a statistically significant difference compared with the endoscopic technique. Patients with a concomitant neurological disease had significantly more early complications in the percutaneous group. Patients with malnutrition had significantly more major complications requiring endoscopic or surgical management.

Conclusion

This study highlights a significant number of major complications or complications requiring additional management under general anesthesia. Children with a concomitant neurological disease or malnutrition are at greater risk of severe and early complications. Infections remain a frequent complication, and prevention strategies should be reviewed.

Reduced complication rate after implementation of a detailed treatment protocol for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with T-fastener fixation in pediatric patients: A prospective study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with push technique (PEG-T) is increasingly used in pediatric patients. In a retrospective study of PEG-T (cohort 1) we reported frequent complications related to T-fasteners and tube dislodgment. The aim of this study was to assess complications after implementation of a strict treatment protocol, and to compare these with the previous retrospective study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study is a prospective study of PEG-T placement performed between 2017 and 2020 (cohort 2) in pediatric patients (0-18 years). Complications were recorded during hospital stay, fourteen days and three months postoperatively, graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification and categorized as early (<30 days) or late (>30 days).

RESULTS

In total 82 patients were included, of which 52 (60%) had neurologic impairments. Median age and weight were 2.0 years [6 months-18.1 years] and 13.4 kg [3.5-51.5 kg], respectively. There was a significant reduction in median operating time from 28 min [10-65 min] in cohort 1 to 15 min [6-35 min] in cohort 2 (p<0.001), number of patients with early tube dislodgement (cohort 1: 9 (10%) vs cohort 2: 1 (1%), p = 0.012), and number of patients with late migrated T-fasteners (cohort 1: 11 (13%) vs cohort 2: 1 (1%), p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

We experienced less migrated T-fasteners and tube dislodgment after implementation of strict treatment protocol.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Treatment study level III.

Endoscopic management of enteral tubes in adult patients - Part 2: Peri- and post-procedural management. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline

ESGE recommends the "pull" technique as the standard method for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends the direct percutaneous introducer ("push") technique for PEG placement in cases where the "pull" method is contraindicated, for example in severe esophageal stenosis or in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) or esophageal cancer.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends the intravenous administration of a prophylactic single dose of a beta-lactam antibiotic (or appropriate alternative antibiotic, in the case of allergy) to decrease the risk of post-procedural wound infection.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence.ESGE recommends that inadvertent insertion of a nasogastric tube (NGT) into the respiratory tract should be considered a serious but avoidable adverse event (AE).Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends that each institution should have a dedicated protocol to confirm correct positioning of NGTs placed "blindly" at the patient's bedside; this should include: radiography, pH testing of the aspirate, and end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring, but not auscultation alone.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends confirmation of correct NGT placement by radiography in high-risk patients (intensive care unit [ICU] patients or those with altered consciousness or absent gag/cough reflex).Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends that EN may be started within 3 - 4 hours after uncomplicated placement of a PEG or PEG-J.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence.ESGE recommends that daily tube mobilization (pushing inward) along with a loose position of the external PEG bumper (1 - 2 cm from the abdominal wall) could mitigate the risk of development of buried bumper syndrome.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.

Safety and efficacy of laparoscopy-assisted percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in infants and small children weighing less than 10 kg: A comparison with larger patients

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopy-assisted percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (LAPEG) can reduce the risk of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy-related complications, such as intra-abdominal organ injury, and determine the optimal position for placement of the gastrostomy tube. We first employed LAPEG 10 years ago but limited its application to elderly patients. Indications for LAPEG have now expanded to small children. This retrospective study aimed to determine the feasibility of LAPEG in children weighing <10 kg.

METHODS

Our LAPEG procedure for small children involves three essential techniques: gastric insufflation with CO₂ to prevent intestinal dilation, a T-fastener device to overcome the difficulties of gastropexy, and primary placement of a button gastrostomy to create less torque than tube gastrostomy at the insertion site and to prevent early tube dislodgement. The medical records of 48 patients with physical and mental disabilities who underwent LAPEG between 2010 and 2018 were evaluated. The outcomes of LAPEG in patients weighing <10 kg (group A, n=11) and ≥10 kg (group B, n=37) were compared.

RESULTS

The LAPEG procedure was completed in all cases without intraoperative complications or open conversion. The median bodyweight of group A was 6.3 kg (range, 3.6-8.2 kg). None of the patients in group A developed postoperative complications such as stomal infection or dislodgement. The operative time was significantly shorter in group A than in group B (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

By improving surgical techniques for small children, our LAPEG procedure might be feasible and safe for treating children weighing <10 kg, including those weighing as little as 3.6 kg.

Open Primary Button Versus Laparoscopic Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy: Results From a Case-control Study

OBJECTIVES

Open primary balloon gastrostomy (PBG) presents a potential alternative to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in children as it obviates the need for change under general anaesthetic; however, the complication profile of PBG compared to PEG is not well defined. Previous series comparing the two have been hampered by the groups not being equivalent. Our paediatric surgical centre has offered PBG as an alternative PEG since 2014. We used a matched case-control study to compare outcomes for PBG and PEG.

METHODS

Patients undergoing PBG were used as "cases" and matched 1:3 by age and diagnosis to patients undergoing PEG, demographics, and clinical data as "controls." Primary outcome was rate of complications classified according to Clavien-Dindo (I-V). Secondary outcomes included time to feed and length of stay. Non-parametric, categorical and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. Data here presented as median with interquartile range (IQR).

RESULTS

We included 140 patients (35 PBG:105 PEG). The 2 groups were comparable for sex, weight at surgery, and follow-up duration. Median operative time was longer for PBG (43 min [IQR 36.5-61.5] vs 27.5 min [18.25-47.75], P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated a statistically significant, higher incidence of symptomatic granulation tissue in PBG (10 [29%] vs 6 [6%], P = 0.0008), this remained significant on multivariate analysis (OR 7.56 [2.33-23.5], P = 0.001), no other complication remained significant. The overall complication rate was not statistically different.

CONCLUSIONS

PBG and PEG have similar overall complication rates; however, PBG appears to have a higher incidence of granulation tissue. This observation must be weighed against the need for further general anaesthetic which is not insignificant in medically complex children.