Growth hormone therapy in GH-deficient adults: continuous vs alternate-days treatment

Patient preferences for growth hormone treatment in Japanese children

BACKGROUND

There are not clear evidence to date evaluating patients' and caregivers' preferences for the recombinant-human growth hormone (r-hGH) injection in children in Japan. This study aimed to quantitatively evaluated the factors driving preferences for daily r-hGH injections among Japanese children with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) or their caregivers and to determine the relative importance of treatment delivery factors.

METHODS

This study was performed among Japanese children with GHD or their caregivers who visited a specialized clinic in Japan as part of their routine care. The participants were asked to complete a web-based discrete choice experiment (DCE) questionnaire.

RESULTS

Choice-based conjoint analysis was used to evaluate the relative importance of the attributes of the choice predictors and determine utility scores for each attribute. Of the 47 respondents who participated in this study, 41 were caregivers who responded on behalf of the patients, the remaining six were patients who completed the DCE themselves. The injection schedule was found to be the most important factor for both patients and caregivers; a once-weekly injection schedule was preferred over a daily injection schedule. Storage and preparation was deemed more important to patients than it was to caregivers, with patients preferring storage at room temperature even if it required additional mixing (reconstitution). Both patients and caregivers showed a clear preference for devices that offered a dose-setting memory.

CONCLUSIONS

A less frequent injection schedule may enhance adherence to r-hGH treatment and expected improve quality of life for GHD patients over the long term.

Adherence, Attitudes and Beliefs of Growth Hormone Deficient Patients - A Questionnaire-based Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

GHD is a chronic and systemic disease requiring daily replacement of growth hormone (GHRT). Adherence and attitudes of adult GHD patients are not well known. We sought to assess patients' knowledge of growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in association with treatment adherence and attitudes regarding available and upcoming treatment options.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional survey with a custom-made questionnaire at a single centre assessing data on demographics, knowledge of GHD, adherence and attitudes towards GHRT.

RESULTS

Of 106 eligible patients actively followed for GHD 70 returned the completed survey (return-rate 66%, 34 m/36 f; age 56±14 years). 46 patients were actively treated, but almost one third (n=24) refused GHRT. 12 patients had participated in clinical trials with LAGH (long-acting growth hormone). Overall, patients with GHRT showed good adherence. Patients refusing GHRT mostly feared side effects and/or had a lack of information/perceived effect. Disease knowledge and level of education were higher in treated than untreated patients (p=0.023/0.017). Only 36% of respondents would initiate treatment with LAGH. Patients with prior LAGH experience and patients with childhood-onset GHD were more likely to adopt LAGH (p=0.048/0.031).

DISCUSSION

Most often, misinformation causes patients to refuse GHRT. Possibly the understanding of their condition and consequences of non-treatment is limited. To improve adherence more focused educational and behavioural strategies may be needed. Willingness to begin a therapy with LAGH was lower than expected (36%). The reasons for reluctance against LAGH need to be elucidated.

More Favorable Metabolic Impact of Three-Times-Weekly versus Daily Growth Hormone Treatment in Naïve GH-Deficient Children

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether two different regimens of weekly injections could lead to similar auxological and metabolic effects in children with growth hormone deficiency (GHD).

DESIGN

32 GHD children (25 males, mean age 10.5 ± 2.2 yr) were randomly assigned to receive daily (group A, 16 patients) or TIW (group B, 16 patients) GHT for 12 months.

METHODS

Auxological parameters, insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), glucose and insulin during OGTT, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), lipid profile, the oral disposition index (DIo), the homeostasis model assessment estimate of insulin resistance (Homa-IR), and the insulin sensitivity index (ISI).

RESULTS

After 12 months, both groups showed a significant and comparable improvement in height (p < 0.001) and IGF-I (p < 0.001). As regards the metabolic parameters, in both groups, we found a significant increase in fasting insulin (p < 0.001 and p = 0.026) and Homa-IR (p < 0.001 and p = 0.019). A significant increase in fasting glucose (p = 0.001) and a decrease in ISI (p < 0.001) and DIo (p = 0.002) were only found in group A.

CONCLUSIONS

The TIW regimen is effective and comparable with the daily regimen in improving auxological parameters and has a more favorable metabolic impact in GHD children. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03033121.

Status of long-acting-growth hormone preparations--2015

Growth hormone (GH) treatment has been an established therapy for GH deficiency (GHD) in children and adults for more than three decades. Numerous studies have shown that GH treatment improves height, body composition, bone density, cardiovascular risk factors, physical fitness and quality of life and that the treatment has few side effects. Initially GH was given as intramuscular injections three times per week, but daily subcutaneous injections were shown to be more effective and less inconvenient and the daily administration has been used since its introduction in the 1980s. However, despite ongoing improvements in injection device design, daily subcutaneous injections remain inconvenient, painful and distressing for many patients, leading to noncompliance, reduced efficacy and increased health care costs. To address these issues a variety of long-acting formulations of GH have been developed. In this review we present the current status of long-acting GH preparations and discuss the specific issues related to their development.

Developments in human growth hormone preparations: sustained-release, prolonged half-life, novel injection devices, and alternative delivery routes

Since the availability of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) enabled the application of human growth hormone both in clinical and research use in the 1980s, millions of patients were prescribed a daily injection of rhGH, but noncompliance rates were high. To address the problem of noncompliance, numerous studies have been carried out, involving: sustained-release preparations, prolonged half-life derivatives, new injectors that cause less pain, and other noninvasive delivery methods such as intranasal, pulmonary and transdermal deliveries. Some accomplishments have been made and launched already, such as the Nutropin Depot^® microsphere and injectors (Zomajet^®, Serojet^®, and NordiFlex^®). Here, we provide a review of the different technologies and illustrate the key points of these studies to achieve an improved rhGH product.

Understanding the growth hormone therapy adherence paradigm: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Growth hormone (GH) therapy is used to treat a variety of growth disorders in childhood/adolescence. Its efficacy is thought to be dependent on patients' adherence to their treatment regimen.

METHODS

PubMed was searched using the keywords 'growth hormone', 'child'[Mesh], 'adolescent'[Mesh], and 'patient compliance'[Mesh].

RESULTS

Most studies of adherence to paediatric GH therapy have used either issued/encashed GH prescriptions or questionnaires. Estimates of prevalence of non-adherence vary from 5-82%, depending on the methods and definitions used. Different studies have variously demonstrated an association (or lack thereof) between adherence and age, socioeconomic status, treatment duration, injection device used and injection-giver. A number of interventions have been proposed to improve adherence, including offering a choice of injection device, but none are supported by trials. Poor adherence is associated with reduced height velocity and likely increased economic costs; evidence for other effects is circumstantial.

CONCLUSION

Adherence to paediatric GH therapy is suboptimal, which may partially explain why the mean final height attained is below that of the general population. Analysis of the causes of non-adherence is complicated by conflicting evidence from different studies. Multifactorial interventions are most likely to be successful in improving adherence. We make recommendations for further research.

Initiating growth hormone therapy for children and adolescents

It is common for children and adolescents on growth hormone (GH) treatment to miss one or more injections per week, thereby compromising their linear growth outcome. Among factors likely to affect treatment concordance are patient education and support in the selection of the most appropriate GH injection device. The authors discovered inconsistencies in the process of starting patients on GH therapy throughout the UK, and found that there were no clinical recommendations to support health professionals starting patients on treatment. This article describes the issues involved and the development of practical recommendations for use when starting paediatric patients on long-term GH therapy.

Multiple doses of pegylated long-acting growth hormone are well tolerated in healthy male volunteers and possess a potential once-weekly treatment profile

OBJECTIVES

Recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) replacement therapy in children and adults currently requires daily subcutaneous injections for several years or lifelong. The current study examined safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic response parameters after single and multiple doses of a long-acting rhGH preparation (NNC126-0083).

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose, dose-escalating (0·02, 0·04, 0·08 and 0·16 mg protein/kg), sequential dose group trial.

SUBJECTS

Forty adult Japanese healthy male volunteers (aged 20-45; body mass index: 18·0-27·0 kg/m(2)). Five groups (n = 8) were randomized to receive multiple doses of NNC126-0083 (n = 6) or placebo (n = 2).

METHODS

Primary outcome was safety, and tolerability of multiple doses of NNC126-0083 compared with placebo. Blood samples for the assessment of pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics response [insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3)] were taken after multiple ascending doses.

RESULTS

NNC126-0083 was well tolerated and not associated with any local injection-site reactions or lipoatrophy. Following administration, NNC126-0083 levels increased rapidly and remained elevated for several days, returning to baseline before each weekly injection. Steady-state PK was achieved after the third dosing. A more than dose-proportional exposure was observed at the highest NNC126-0083 dose (0·16 mg protein/kg). A strong dose-dependent pharmacodynamic response in circulating concentrations of both IGF-I and IGFBP-3 compared with placebo (P < 0·0001) was observed during the administration of all doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple administration of NNC126-0083 in healthy male volunteers indicates that NNC126-0083 has the potential for an efficacious, well-tolerated, once-weekly rhGH compound in the treatment of GH deficiency.

Observations of nonadherence to recombinant human growth hormone therapy in clinical practice

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of all prescribed treatments is contingent on patient adherence. The reported levels of adherence to recombinant human growth hormone (r-hGH) therapy are highly variable, but it has been suggested that nonadherence might be as high as 36% to 49%.

OBJECTIVES

This commentary discusses the factors that affect long-term adherence to injection treatment, of which r-hGH therapy is a particular challenge. It also explores potential strategies to improve adherence to injection treatments in clinical practice.

METHODS

The opinion of the authors was validated and supported by published literature. A PubMed literature search was conducted in November 2006, identifying English-language articles containing key terms growth hormone, adherence, and compliance.

RESULTS

This study found that factors associated with poor adherence to injection treatments include patients' lack of understanding of their disease, patient age, chronicity of the disease, complex treatment regimens, and insufficient information on the implications of nonadherence. Strengthening the patient-physician relationship by providing the patient with a clear understanding of his/her disease and the benefits of adherence, making improvements in injection devices, and eliminating subjective illness concepts, might increase adherence to SC injection treatments, thereby reducing increasing health care costs associated with nonadherence.

CONCLUSIONS

Poor adherence to r-hGH therapy has a dual effect, in that it leads to reduced efficacy out-comes and increased health care costs. Implementing strategies to improve adherence with injection treatment might be of particular clinical benefit to patients undergoing r-hGH therapy.

[hGH treatment impact on adrenal and thyroid functions]

Somatotrophic status is a major determinant of both thyrotrophic and corticotrophic axis. In growth hormone deficient patients, somatotrophic replacement increases the conversion rate of the inactive form of the thyroid hormone (T4) to its active form (T3), whereas the same replacement induces the conversion of cortisol, which is hormonally active, in cortisone, its inactive form. This review details the effects of GH on these two hormonal axis, possible mechanisms and clinical implications for the management of hypopituitary patients.

Bridging Regional and Global Perspectives

In recent years, medical practice has evolved towards greater reliance on evidence-based medicine. Societies and reimbursement agencies often publish recommendations for treatment based on literature review and trial data. Despite this, growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy in adults varies substantially from region to region. The reasons for this include differing beliefs in quality of life benefits, the cost-effectiveness of GH and the role of GH in reducing cardiovascular mortality. Reimbursement varies from almost complete take-up in Sweden and Germany, to strict guidelines in the UK, while in some countries GH is not reimbursable for adults with GH deficiency, leaving patients open to the short- and long-term consequences of the condition. Clearly, there is a need for further evidence regarding the overall value of GH replacement. Randomized, controlled trials are the foundation of evidence-based medicine, but long-term treatment is difficult to assess in such trials. Thus, there is an important role for large-scale registries in gathering evidence. For example, the MEGHA (Metabolic Endocrinology and Growth Hormone Assessment) database provides participants with a sub- studies function, allowing them to create and design collective, observational studies to investigate areas of GH medicine that are of particular interest or concern to them and their patients.