Immunologic and oncologic implications of laparoscopic surgery: what is the latest?

Factors affecting sufentanil consumption for intravenous controlled analgesia after hepatectomy: retrospective analysis

Background

Pain control after hepatectomy is usually achieved by opioids. There are significant individual differences in the amount of opioids used after hepatectomy, and the metabolism of opioids is liver-dependent. The purpose of our study was to explore the possible risk factors for opioid consumption during the first 48 h after surgery.

Methods

In a retrospective study design involving 562 patients undergoing open or laparoscopic hepatectomy, all patients were treated with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) along with continuous and bolus doses of sufentanil for a duration of 48 h after surgery during the time period of August 2015 and February 2019. The primary endpoint was high sufentanil consumption 48 h after hepatectomy, and patients were divided into two groups: those with or without a high PCA sufentanil dosage depending on the third quartile (Q3). The secondary endpoint was the effect of a high PCA sufentanil dosage on various possible clinical risk factors. The relevant parameters were collected, and correlation and multivariate regression analyses were performed.

Results

The median operation time was 185 min (range, 115–250 min), and the median consumption of sufentanil 48 h after the operation was 91 μg (IQR, 64.00, 133.00). Factors related to the consumption of sufentanil at 48 h after hepatectomy included age, operation time, blood loss, intraoperative infusion (red blood cells and fresh-frozen plasma), pain during movement after surgery (day 1 and day 2), preoperative albumin, and postoperative blood urea nitrogen. Age (≤ 60 and > 60 years), extent of resection (minor hepatic resection and major hepatic resection), surgical approach (laparoscope and open) and operation time (min) were independent risk factors for sufentanil consumption at 48 h postoperatively.

Conclusion

Age younger than 60 years, major hepatic resection, an open approach and a longer operation are factors more likely to cause patients to require higher doses of sufentanil after hepatectomy, and the early identification of such patients can increase the efficacy of perioperative pain management.

huARdb: human Antigen Receptor database for interactive clonotype-transcriptome analysis at the single-cell level

T-cell receptors (TCRs) and B-cell receptors (BCRs) are critical in recognizing antigens and activating the adaptive immune response. Stochastic V(D)J recombination generates massive TCR/BCR repertoire diversity. Single-cell immune profiling with transcriptome analysis allows the high-throughput study of individual TCR/BCR clonotypes and functions under both normal and pathological settings. However, a comprehensive database linking these data is not yet readily available. Here, we present the human Antigen Receptor database (huARdb), a large-scale human single-cell immune profiling database that contains 444 794 high confidence T or B cells (hcT/B cells) with full-length TCR/BCR sequence and transcriptomes from 215 datasets. All datasets were processed in a uniform workflow, including sequence alignment, cell subtype prediction, unsupervised cell clustering, and clonotype definition. We also developed a multi-functional and user-friendly web interface that provides interactive visualization modules for biologists to analyze the transcriptome and TCR/BCR features at the single-cell level. HuARdb is freely available at https://huarc.net/database with functions for data querying, browsing, downloading, and depositing. In conclusion, huARdb is a comprehensive and multi-perspective atlas for human antigen receptors.

Laparoscopic total nephrectomy for Wilms tumor: Towards new standards of care

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic total nephrectomy (LN) in malignant pediatric tumors remains controversial. For selected patients undergoing pre-operative chemotherapy in referral centers, LN has so far shown comparable results to the standard open technique.

PURPOSE

To describe the inclusion criteria and preliminary results of laparoscopic nephrectomies (LN) for the treatment of unilateral Wilms tumors (WT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between November 2010 and January 2016, a retrospective study of patients with WT and undergoing pre-operative chemotherapy was performed. Inclusion criteria for candidates for LN were: unilateral tumors without venous invasion and central kidney localization. Tumor size and vascular thrombus were estimated with pre-operative computed tomography (CT) scan. Overall survival and recurrence rates were evaluated.

RESULTS

Among 105 patients with WT, 14 underwent LN. Tumor bleeding or the lack of response to chemotherapy were not exclusion criteria. Median tumor volume for the patients undergoing LN was 71.5 cc (range 7-169). Patients with small tumors localized near the renal pole and candidates for nephron sparing surgery (NSS) were excluded. Estimated 5-year overall survival for all patients with WT during this period was 88.7% (88.1-103.1). Two patients underwent conversion. No recurrence or related death was found at a mean 32- month follow-up period.

DISCUSSION

Reproducing the steps of the open nephrectomy when performing LN for malignant tumors allowed comparable oncologic results to the conventional procedure. However, upstaging of the tumor was not admissible and has become the main goal when approaching these patients laparoscopically. Preliminary results showed that the incidence of intraoperative rupture and incomplete node sampling were not an issue when comparing LN to open nephrectomy. On the other hand, LN for malignant tumors requires experience in advanced laparoscopy and oncologic surgery. Pre-operative chemotherapy changes the tumor's consistency and this is the key point as to why these patients are amenable to be approached laparoscopically. Lifting the tumor along with the fat to avoid capsule fraction, as well as changing the lens to the lateral port to achieve a correct view for lymph node sampling are some of the considerations when performing LN.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary data suggest that LN for WT is feasible and has promising results in terms of event-free and overall survival. In patients undergoing pre-operative chemotherapy the correct selection for LN is crucial. Following the basic oncological precepts and in experienced centers, LN represents a plausible modality in the care of these patients.

Advantages of laparoscopic compared to conventional surgery are not related to an innate immune response of peritoneal immune activation: an animal study in rats

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic surgery (LS) has proved superior compared to conventional surgery (CS) regarding morbidity, length of hospital stay, rate of wound infection and time until recovery. An improved preservation of the postoperative immune function is assumed to contribute to these benefits though the role of the local peritoneal immune response is still poorly understood. Our study investigates the peritoneal immune response subsequent to abdominal surgery and compares it between laparoscopic and conventional surgery to find an immunological explanation for the clinically proven benefits of LS.

METHODS

Wistar rats (N = 140) underwent laparoscopic cecum resection (LCR; N = 28), conventional cecum resection (CCR; N = 28), laparoscopic sham operation (LSO; N = 28), conventional sham operation (CSO; N = 28), or no surgical treatment (CTRL; N = 28). Postoperatively, peritoneal lavages were performed, leukocytes isolated and analyzed regarding immune function and phagocytosis activity.

RESULTS

Immune function was inhibited postoperatively in animals undergoing LCR or CCR compared to CTRL reflected by a lower TNF-α (CTRL 3956.65 pg/ml, LCR 2018.48 pg/ml (p = 0.023), CCR 2793.78 pg/ml (n.s.)) and IL-6 secretion (CTRL 625.84 pg/ml, LCR 142.84 pg/ml (p = 0.009), CCR 169.53 pg/ml (p = 0.01)). Phagocytosis was not affected in rats undergoing any kind of surgery compared to CTRL. Neither cytokine secretion nor phagocytosis activity differed significantly between laparoscopic and conventional surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our findings the benefits associated with LS compared to CS cannot be explained by differences in the postoperative peritoneal innate immune response. Further studies are needed to elucidate the causes for a more favorable postoperative outcome in patients after LS compared to CS.

Immune response after laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: a review

Background and aim: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide and laparoscopic colectomy has been established as equivalent to the open approach in terms of oncological results and patients’ safety. Survival benefits have been reported in favor of laparoscopic colectomy (LC) in stage III CRC patients. Different immune responses after surgery, in terms of innate and cellular immunity, may potentially explain some of the reported differences. This review summarizes the literature on differences in immune response after the laparoscopic and the open approach for CRC.

Materials and Methods: A literature search of electronic databases was conducted and all studies published on ‘colorectal cancer’, ‘laparoscopic and open colectomy’ ‘immune response’ and ‘surgical stress laparoscopy versus open’ were collected. Among these, the ones referring to CRC and those that had any clinical relevance offering information on perioperative parameters were used.

Results: Despite the heterogeneity of studies, they support the view that innate immune response is activated to a greater degree in open colectomy (OC), which may be related to the more extensive trauma and surgical stress. On the other hand, cellular immunity is better preserved after LC. These differences are more pronounced in the immediate postoperative period.

Conclusions: LC has been related to decreased up-regulation of innate immunity and better-preserved cellular immunity. The latter may be related to better anti-tumor activity and may be beneficial in terms of oncological survival in a subgroup of LC patients.

Systemic inflammatory response after laparoscopic and conventional colectomy for cancer: a matched case-control study

BACKGROUND

Studies dealing with laparoscopic colectomy for cancer have reached conflicting results in regards to various inflammatory cytokines. Most of them have not examined potential differences with the open procedures at later postoperative days, when the immunologic advantage of laparoscopic surgery would be more demanding to demonstrate (for earlier administration of adjuvant treatment). The aim of this work is to detect differences of proinflammatory cytokines between conventional and laparoscopic colectomy for cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

30 patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy were age, sex, and preoperative stage-matched with 30 patients treated by open surgery. C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin (IL)-1, -6, and -8, and interferon (IFN)-γ serum levels were measured preoperatively, at 24 h, and at the 7th postoperative day (POD).

RESULTS

CRP and IL-6 postoperative values (24 h and 7th POD) were significantly higher than baseline for both groups (p = 0.001), but the respective values at the 7th POD were less than at 24 h (p = 0.001). IL-1 and -8 levels did not show any differences between assessment timepoints. A higher IFN-γ measurement was demonstrated at 24 h compared with baseline for the laparoscopic group only (p = 0.03). This difference was not maintained at the 7th POD. IFN-γ levels at 24 h and the 7th POD were significantly less for the open compared with the laparoscopic group of patients (p = 0.001). No correlation was revealed between measured serum values and age, sex, tumor location, or stage.

CONCLUSIONS

This matched case-control study verifies the already reported lack of differences regarding IL-1. Controversy still exists on likely IL-6 differences. The inadequately studied IL-8 does not seem to play an important role in immunologic differences. The immunologically beneficial IFN-γ, produced by the principal effectors of cell-mediated immunity Th1 cells, seems to have a more active presence following laparoscopic colectomy, potentially contributing to an immunologic "advantage" by counteracting "harmful" cytokines, such as IL-1.

Laparoscopic versus conventional open surgery for immune function in patients with colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

To systematically evaluate the immune function in patients with colorectal cancer after laparoscopic surgery (LS) and conventional open surgery (OS).

METHODS

PUBMED, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library were searched and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the immunological difference between LS and OS were included. Two authors extracted data and assessed trial quality.

RESULTS

Eleven studies including 695 patients were analysed. Immune-competent cells demonstrated no significant differences between LS and OS in six trials. Eight trials assessed various perioperative plasma cytokine concentrations with no significant differences in interleukin-6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels between LS and OS. However, meta-analysis showed higher T suppressor lymphocytes (CD8+) counts on postoperative days (POD) 1-3 and lower plasma levels of CRP on POD 0-1 in LS group compared with OS group.

CONCLUSION

Although LS groups displayed higher T suppressor lymphocyte (CD8+) counts on postoperative days (POD) 1-3 and lower plasma levels of CRP on POD 0-1, there is no sufficient evidence to support superior preservation of global immune function with LS compared to OS.

Immunological effects of laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy

This prospective, randomized, controlled study evaluated plasma levels of interleukin-18 (IL-18) and monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-l) in patients undergoing cholecystectomy. Forty patients were randomized to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) or open cholecystectomy (OC). Plasma concentrations of IL-18 and MCP-1 were measured before anaesthesia (T(0)), before operation (T(1)), 30 min after the start of the operation (T(2)) and at the end of the operation (T(3)). Compared with T(0), the IL-18 concentration was significantly increased at T(2) and T(3) in both groups. In addition, the MCP-1 concentration was significantly increased at T(3) compared with T(0) in the LC group. Both the IL-18 and MCP-1 concentrations were significantly lower in the OC group than in the LC group at T(3). It is suggested that carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum may cause immunodepression, that epidural anaesthesia can attenuate the stress response, and that IL-18 and MCP-1 are sensitive markers for evaluating the patient's immune function.

Advances in cancer surgery: natural orifice surgery (NOTES) for oncological diseases

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is a new concept that attempts to reduce the impact of surgery on the patient. In surgical oncology several studies have already revealed that a minimally invasive approach provides at least the same, if not a better, long-term outcome. One could hypothesize that a less invasive approach such as NOTES could further enhance such advantages. Since its initial description, NOTES has become clinical reality and today nearly every organ is accessible by a transluminal approach, in at least the experimental setting. Subsequent to published research, first clinical studies on NOTES in oncology were reported and the accuracy of transgastric peritoneoscopy for staging of pancreas cancer was shown to be similar to laparoscopy in humans. A NOTES gastro-jejunostomy via transgastric access has also been proposed to decrease invasiveness of palliative treatment of duodenal, biliary and pancreatic cancers. Colorectal cancer resection via transanal access would offer a clear-cut patient advantage over laparoscopic and would not be subject to the frequent criticism of violating an innocent second organ, as the colon or rectum is always breached in a colectomy. Natural orifice endoluminal therapies, such as endoscopic submucosal dissection, already have been clinically applied for several years. Improved techniques or instruments evolving from NOTES technology might enhance its widespread use for the treatment of early malignancies and thereby again will provide a tremendous benefit for the patient. Although still somewhat controversial, the subject of natural orifice surgery in oncological disease indicates that current laboratory efforts to introduce NOTES into cancer surgery could be ready for cautious clinical investigations. The final determination of patient benefit will need well-constructed prospective study.

Novel murine model for colon cancer: non-operative trans-anal rectal injection

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to develop a modified murine model of colon cancer that is non-operative. Currently, the most accurate orthotopic murine model of colon cancer requires an invasive procedure involving cecal injection of colon cancer cells and therefore limits the ability to perform immunological studies subsequent to cecal resections.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Murine colon cancer (CT26) cells were injected submucosally into the distal, posterior rectum of BALB/c mice. Care was taken not to pass transmurally into the pelvic cavity. Different magnifications (10x versus 100x) were used for injection, and primary tumor growth and metastatic disease were studied.

RESULTS

In the initial study, 3/7 mice injected using 10x magnifications had notable, large tumor originating from the rectal wall, and histology revealed that all excised tumors were poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. In the second study, 8/10 mice injected using 100x magnifications had notable tumor originating from the rectal well, and 4/8 mice had abnormal lung tissue with pathological evidence of hemorrhagic pulmonary edema. The use of 10x magnification resulted in 43% tumor take. In sharp contrast, 80% tumor take was observed with 100x magnification. The overall success of tumor take was 65% using the trans-anal rectal injection model.

CONCLUSIONS

Our modified orthotopic murine model of colon cancer offers an alternative non-operative murine model for colon cancer and is less invasive than the traditional orthotopic model (i.e., cecal injection). This model may allow for more accurate investigations of inflammation and immune responses to surgical intervention without the influence of previous abdominal surgery.