Practicable and valid approach to evaluate the efficacy of nootropic drugs by means of rating scales

Prazosin effects on objective sleep measures and clinical symptoms in civilian trauma posttraumatic stress disorder: a placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Prazosin, a central nervous system (CNS) active alpha-1 adrenoreceptor antagonist, has reduced nightmares and sleep disturbance in placebo-controlled studies of combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). We evaluated objective sleep parameters and PTSD symptoms in a placebo-controlled prazosin trial for civilian trauma-related PTSD.

METHODS

Thirteen outpatients with chronic civilian trauma PTSD, frequent nightmares, and sleep disturbance participated in a randomized placebo-controlled crossover trial of prazosin. Sleep parameters were quantified at home with the REMView (Respironics, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania). The PTSD symptoms were quantified with the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) "recurrent distressing dreams" and "disturbed sleep" items, a non-nightmare distressed awakenings scale, the PTSD Dream Rating Scale (PDRS), the PTSD Checklist-Civilian (PCL-C), and the Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I).

RESULTS

Prazosin compared with placebo significantly increased total sleep time by 94 min; increased rapid eye movement (REM) sleep time and mean REM period duration without altering sleep onset latency; significantly reduced trauma-related nightmares, distressed awakenings, and total PCL scores; significantly improved CGI-I scores; and changed PDRS scores toward normal dreaming.

CONCLUSIONS

Prazosin reductions of nighttime PTSD symptoms in civilian trauma PTSD are accompanied by increased total sleep time, REM sleep time, and mean REM period duration in the absence of a sedative-like effect on sleep onset latency.

Reliability study on the Japanese version of the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change. Analysis of subscale items and 'clinician's impression'

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The Japanese version of the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change plus Caregiver Input (CIBIC-plus J) consists of 3 subscales: Disability Assessment of Dementia Scale (DAD), Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (Behave-AD), and Mental Function Impairment Scale (MENFIS), as well as the Clinician's Global Impression of Change (CGIC). While the interrater reliability of CGIC has already been reported, that of the 3 subscales has not. The aim of the present report was to examine the reliabilities of the subscale items and investigate their relationships with CGIC.

METHODS

Eleven raters who were clinical physicians watched videotapes of 20 patients with Alzheimer's disease, completed the CIBIC-plus J assessment form, and assigned a CGIC score to the patients. Reliability was assessed using the kappa coefficient.

RESULTS

The kappa coefficient of the subscale items was in most instances higher than that of CGIC (0.453) and substantial reliability was observed. The Spearman rank correlation that was calculated between CGIC and the total score change of items was very high for MENFIS (0.990) and DAD (0.910), and moderate for Behave-AD items (0.576). The incidence of comments by the raters was highest for MENFIS (89%), followed by DAD (70%). The incidence was low for Behave-AD items (48%).

CONCLUSION

Based on the results, it is concluded that DAD, Behave-AD, and MENFIS are necessary constituents of CIBIC-plus J, and indispensable for the reliability of CGIC.

Developmental disabilities modification of the Children's Global Assessment Scale

BACKGROUND

Interventions for pervasive developmental disorders (PDD) aim to alleviate symptoms and improve functioning. To measure global functioning in treatment studies, the Children's Global Assessment Scale was modified and psychometric properties of the revised version (DD-CGAS) were assessed in children with PDD.

METHODS

Developmental disabilities-relevant descriptors were developed for the DD-CGAS, and administration procedures were established to enhance rater consistency. Ratings of clinical case vignettes were used to assess inter-rater reliability and temporal stability. Validity was assessed by correlating the DD-CGAS with measures of functioning and symptoms in 83 youngsters with PDD. Sensitivity to change was assessed by comparing change from baseline to post-treatment with change on the Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Irritability and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement subscale scores in a subset of 14 children.

RESULTS

Inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = .79) and temporal stability (average ICC = .86) were excellent. The DD-CGAS scores correlated with measures of functioning and symptoms with moderate to large effect sizes. Changes on the DD-CGAS correlated with changes on the Aberrant Behavior Checklist-I (r = -.71) and Global Impressions Scale-I (r = -.52). The pre-post DD-CGAS change had an effect size of .72.

CONCLUSIONS

The DD-CGAS is a reliable instrument with apparent convergent validity for measuring global functioning of children with PDD in treatment studies.

[A Brazilian Portuguese version for the ADCS-CGIC scale]

Given increasing research into new therapies for dementia, especially for Alzheimer disease, it has become clear that traditional methods of evaluation, centered on cognition, have proved insufficient. Thus, scales for behavioral disturbances and activities of daily living have been added. Nevertheless, some observations of clinical significant changes, as reported by caregivers, could be overlooked. Clinician's impression of global change scales (CIGIC) are based on broader information and may detect more subtle changes. Typically they take into consideration caregiver information, that which is seen by the health professional during the interview, and may also include brief cognitive tests. We present a Brazilian Portuguese version of a widely used scale of this type, specifically designed for Alzheimer disease (ADCS-CGIC), being the result of the recommended method of translation, back-translation and version by panel consensus.

The alpha1-adrenergic antagonist prazosin improves sleep and nightmares in civilian trauma posttraumatic stress disorder

Heightened noradrenergic reactivity may be a contributing factor in the pathophysiology of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Prazosin is an alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonist commonly used as an antihypertensive agent. Because alpha1-adrenergic activity has been associated with fear and startle responses, a drug that blocks central alpha1-adrenergic activity may be useful in the treatment of PTSD symptoms. An outpatient who had been exposed to civilian trauma and had subsequent chronic refractory PTSD was thus prescribed prazosin. The marked reduction in PTSD symptoms, particularly sleep and nightmares, prompted the following open-label feasibility trial. Five outpatients with non-combat-related PTSD were consecutively identified and received prazosin in a 6-week open-label trial. In each case, the prazosin doses were slowly increased until optimal benefit was achieved. Change was assessed with the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-IV, One Week Symptom Version (CAPS-SX), the Clinical Global Impression of Change Scale (CGIC), and the Clinical Impression of Change-Nightmares (CIC-Nightmares) score. All five patients experienced moderate to marked improvement on the CGIC. The CAPS-SX PTSD nightmare and sleep PTSD categories showed at least a four-point reduction of those symptoms. All patients reported at least moderate improvement on the CIC-Nightmare score. Optimal doses of prazosin ranged from 1 to 4 mg/day. The drug was reasonably tolerated, and there were no drug discontinuations. These preliminary findings provide a rationale for blind placebo-controlled efficacy trials of the alpha 1 antagonist prazosin for PTSD.

Modification of the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Scale for use in bipolar illness (BP): the CGI-BP

The Clinical Global Impressions Scale (CGI) was modified specifically for use in assessing global illness severity and change in patients with bipolar disorder. Criticisms of the original CGI were addressed by correcting inconsistencies in scaling, identifying time frames for comparison, clarifying definitions of illness severity and change, and separating out assessment of treatment side effects from illness improvement during treatment. A Detailed User's Guide was developed to train clinicians in the use of the new CGI-Bipolar Version (CGI-BP) for rating severity of manic and depressive episodes and the degree of change from the immediately preceding phase and from the worst phase of illness. The revised scale and manual provide a focused set of instructions to facilitate the reliability of these ratings of mania, depression, and overall bipolar illness during treatment of an acute episode or in longer-term illness prophylaxis. Interrater reliability of the scale was demonstrated in preliminary analyses. Thus, the modified CGI-BP is anticipated to be more useful than the original CGI in studies of bipolar disorder.

Side effects of low dose neuroleptics and their impact on clinical outcome in generalized anxiety disorder

1. The present study was designed to determine the impact of neuroleptic side effects on clinical outcome in generalized anxiety disorder. 2. 205 outpatients entered the study. In an open label design fluspirilene 1.5 mg per week was administered for a period of 6 weeks. 3. Consistent with previous studies fluspirilene demonstrated again anxiolytic properties and was in general tolerated well. 4. However, in responders significantly less side effects were observed than in nonresponders. The interaction between tolerability and clinical outcome is the main finding of the present study. 5. In conclusion, the data suggest, that neuroleptic treatment of generalized anxiety disorder should be guided by paying more attention to potential side effects. If under neuroleptic treatment of generalized anxiety disorders side effects are observed, pharmacotherapy should be discontinued, because this fact predicts an unfavourable clinical outcome.

Clinical evaluation of global change in Alzheimer's disease: identifying consensus

It is important that clinicians who rate global change as part of Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical drug trials agree on a relevant set of behaviors and information to be considered in formulating their rating. Yet, consensus among raters has been difficult to establish, and inter-rater reliability of clinical global impression of change (CGIC) ratings has been low. In preparation for the development of a new CGIC scale to be used in AD clinical trials, the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC), we surveyed clinicians at sites comprising the National Institute on Aging-sponsored ADCS participating centers to identify whether or not consensus regarding CGICs exists. Overall, respondents reported that a CGIC should include an assessment of the patient's function and mental status, a care giver interview, and a standardized set of questions, and it should take approximately 20 minutes per interview. Depending on a patient's level of impairment, raters consider different areas of behavior in formulating a CGIC rating. These findings demonstrate the considerable consensus regarding the CGIC rating process, and were integrated into the design of the ADCS-CGIC, currently in use.

Test therapy in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorders with low dose fluspirilene

1. The present double-blind study was designed to determine under three different conditions (0.5 mg, 1.0 mg, 1.5 mg per week) whether response or non-response within a two-week test-therapy predicts clinical outcome after 6 weeks of fluspirilene treatment in generalized anxiety disorders. 2. 106 outpatients entered the study. The period of observation was 6 weeks. 3. Confirming previous reports of their study group the authors found a significant reduction of anxiety in all treatment groups. However, this effect was mainly observed with the highest dose administered. The main finding of the study is that there is a significant correlation between initial response after 2 weeks of test therapy and therapeutic success after 6 weeks in fluspirilene treatment of generalized anxiety disorders. 4. Decreases in somatic anxiety, psychic anxiety and Hamilton-total-score within the first 2 weeks correlate with the baseline-to-week 6 decreases of the corresponding item and with the global clinical assessment of efficacy after 6 weeks. 5. By means of test therapy patients with an unfavourable outcome are identified and, if medication is discontinued, are prevented from an ineffective longterm treatment.

Double-blind cross-over study of phosphatidylserine vs. placebo in patients with early dementia of the Alzheimer type

Thirty-three patients with mild primary degenerative dementia according to DSM-III (MMS between 15 and 27) took part in a double-blind cross-over study of phosphatidylserine (Fidia, 300 mg/d) versus placebo. Both treatment phases lasted for 8 weeks with an 8 week washout phase in between and a 4 week washout phase before treatment phase one. Clinical global improvement ratings showed significantly more patients improving under BC-PS than under placebo during treatment phase one. The improvement carried over to the following wash-out and treatment phases. There were no significant improvements in GBS dementia rating scale, psychometric tests or P300-latency. 16-channel EEG mapping findings indicated that the patients initially showed higher power values in all frequency bands (except alpha), when compared to a younger, healthy control group. BC-PS reduced the higher power values compared to placebo, shifting EEG power more towards the normal level.

Memantine in the treatment of senile dementia of the Alzheimer type

The efficacy of the dopaminergic substance Memantine was studied in severe cases of senile dementia of the Alzheimer type using a randomized single blind trial. Following 20 days of a basis therapy, consisting mainly of the proper therapy of medical disorders, 10 patients received 20-30mg Memantine pro die intravenously, 10 other patients were given placebo infusions. Patients were evaluated using the Syndrom Kurztest, the Funktionspsychose-Skala, the Plutchik Geriatric Rating Scale as well as the Sandoz Clinical Assessment Geriatric 5 times following the baseline period. Statistical evaluation showed no significant differences between the two groups. Mild amelioration of sleep-wakefulness cycles and impulse and drive functions could be observed clinically in both groups. Side effects (deterioration of psychopathology in two patients of the Memantine group) disappeared after withdrawal of the substance.