[Transvaginal ultrasound of the endometrium in postmenopause]

A thin and regular endometrium on ultrasound is very unlikely in patients with endometrial malignancy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical and sonographic features in patients with endometrial malignancy in whom endometrial thickness on ultrasound examination had been recorded in our database to be < 5 mm.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study on 187 consecutive patients diagnosed with endometrial malignancy in whom an ultrasound evaluation of the endometrium had been performed in our institution. The characteristics of those patients presenting with an endometrial thickness < 5 mm were analyzed.

RESULTS

The median endometrial thickness was 15 mm: 12 mm for the women who underwent endometrial sampling before ultrasound examination vs. 17 mm in those who did not (P = 0.0086). In 13 women (6.9%), the endometrial thickness recorded in our database was < 5 mm. In 12 of these the measurement was compromised in some way: nine of these patients had undergone endometrial sampling (Pipelle biopsy in one and dilatation and curettage in eight patients) before the ultrasound examination, in two cases, focal malignant lesions were not included in the recorded endometrial thickness and in one, the endometrial thickness was visualized poorly due to myometrial distortion. In only one case was was the endometrium correctly measured to be < 5 mm; this woman had diffuse uterine and endometrial metastases of a breast cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

A thin and regular endometrial line is very reliable for the exclusion of endometrial carcinoma. The suspicion of focal lesions as well as incomplete visualization of the endometrium on sonography should be considered abnormal. Recently performed endometrial sampling makes measurement of the endometrial thickness unreliable.

Ultrasonographic endometrial thickness for diagnosing endometrial pathology in women with postmenopausal bleeding: a meta-analysis

Our aim was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of endometrial thickness measurement by pelvic ultrasonography for predicting endometrial carcinoma and disease (hyperplasia and/or carcinoma) during an investigation of postmenopausal bleeding. We performed a systematic quantitative review of the available published literature, which consisted of online searching the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases (1966-2000) coupled with scanning of bibliography of known primary and review articles. The selection of studies, assessment of study quality, and extraction of data were performed in duplicate under masked conditions. Included in the analyses were 57 studies with 9031 patients. Accuracy data were summarized using likelihood ratios for various cut-off levels of abnormal endometrial thickness. The commonest cut-offs were 4 mm (9 studies) and 5 mm (21 studies), measuring both endometrial layers. None of the nine studies using the < or = 4 mm cut-off level were of good quality. Only four studies (out of the 21) used the < or = 5 mm cut-off level, which employed the best-quality criteria. Using the pooled estimates from these four studies only, a positive test result raised the probability of carcinoma from 14.0% (95% CI 13.3-14.7) to 31.3% (95% CI 26.1-36.3), while a negative test reduced it to 2.5% (95% CI 0.9-6.4). In conclusion, ultrasound measurement of endometrial thickness alone, using the best-quality studies cannot be used to accurately rule. However, a negative result at < or = 5 mm cut-off level measuring both endometrial layers in the presence of endometrial pathology rules out endometrial pathology with good certainty.

Value of sonomorphological criteria of the endometrium in women with postmenopausal bleeding: a multivariate analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to examine whether an improvement in the transvaginal sonographic evaluation of the endometrium is possible by the addition of sonomorphological criteria to the measurement of endometrial thickness in women with postmenopausal bleeding.

METHODS

Various sonomorphological criteria were analyzed prospectively in 321 patients with postmenopausal bleeding. In a logistic regression model relevant criteria were selected and a diagnostic formula for differentiation of endometrial sonographic findings was derived.

RESULTS

The criteria of endometrial structure, endometrial-myometrial border and endometrial thickness were significant for the differentiation of malignancy. These results allowed an estimation of the probability of malignancy for each sonographic endometrial finding. Using the cut-off point of 0.1 for the probability of malignancy, the sensitivity and specificity were 96.8% and 61.9%, respectively, with an accuracy of 72.3%. In contrast, the differentiation by endometrial thickness as the sole criterion (cut-off point > or = 5 mm) achieved a sensitivity of 97.9% and a specificity of 33.2%, with an accuracy of 52.3%.

CONCLUSION

A useful diagnostic formula based on sonomorphological and metric criteria for endometrial differentiation was obtained. The specificity and accuracy increased with a minimal loss of sensitivity. However, estimates for sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy may be overoptimistic because they were derived from the same data used for development of the model.

Transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of endometrial thickness in postmenopausal women receiving estrogen replacement therapy

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to evaluate endometrial thickness by transvaginal ultrasonography in asymptomatic postmenopausal women receiving estrogen replacement therapy. The endometrial thickness in this study group was compared with endometrial thickness measurements in a group of women who had abnormal postmenopausal bleeding. The recent literature was reviewed.

STUDY DESIGN

Asymptomatic postmenopausal women receiving estrogen replacement, seen for routine examination during the 1-year period from Jan. 1, 1994, to Dec. 31, 1995, had the endometrium evaluated by transvaginal ultrasonography. Women with abnormal postmenopausal bleeding were likewise evaluated and their measurements compared with those of the study group.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven different estrogen and estrogen-progestin combinations in 327 asymptomatic women were studied. Additionally, 24 women who were bleeding, not receiving estrogen, and 46 women with abnormal bleeding on estrogen therapy underwent ultrasonography of the endometrium. Endometrial thickness ranged from 1 to 15 mm in women on a regimen of combined estrogen-progestin therapy, 1 to 14 mm in women using sequential estrogen-progestin, and 3 to 15 mm for women receiving unopposed estrogen in the study group. For women with abnormal bleeding not using estrogen, the endometrium measured an average of 12.3 mm (range 2 to 29 mm), with unopposed estrogen 8.3 mm (range 4 to 13 mm), and for estrogen with progestin 6.5 mm (range 2 to 15 mm). Significant pathologic features were found in those women who had bleeding and endometrial measurements between 5.0 and 29 mm.

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference between endometrial thickness measurements in women receiving various combinations of estrogen replacement. In general, expected endometrial measurements can range from 1 to 15 mm. In women with postmenopausal bleeding, however, significant pathologic features may exist with an endometrium measuring as little as 5 mm.