[Clarithromycin, a new macrolide antibiotic. Effectiveness in puerperal infections and pharmacokinetics in breast milk]

Pharmacokinetic study of clarithromycin in human breast milk by UPLC-MS/MS

This study aimed to develop a validated UPLC-MS/MS method for pharmacokinetic analysis of clarithromycin in human breast milk. For sample preparation, proteins precipitated with methanol and azithromycin were used as internal standards. Clarithromycin and azithromycin detection was achieved using electrospray ionization in positive mode. The chromatographic separation time was 5 min. The lower limit of quantification was 50 ng/mL. The calibration curve of clarithromycin was 50-4000 ng/mL, with a correlation coefficient> 0.99. The method was successfully applied to determine clarithromycin levels in breast milk obtained from a lactating mother after oral administration of a single tablet containing 500 mg of clarithromycin. The maximum human breast milk concentration (C_max) was 3660 ng/mL, the time to reach the maximum concentration (t_max) was 2.5 h, and the area under curve (AUC_0-24) was 18450 ng h/mL. The present study provides a novel UPLC-MS/MS method for pharmacokinetic analysis of clarithromycin in breast milk.

Antibiotics and lactation: An overview of relative infant doses and a systematic assessment of clinical studies

Breastfeeding is important for the development of the child. Many antibiotics are considered safe during breastfeeding. The aim of the study was to assess the quality of lactation studies with antibiotics using the FDA and International Lactation Consultant Association quality guidelines for lactation studies. The secondary goal was to determine the exposure of the breastfed infant to antibiotics in relation to bacterial resistance and the developing microbiome. A literature search was performed and the included studies were scored on methodology, parameters concerning maternal exposure to antibiotics, maternal plasma and milk sampling. The infant exposure has been calculated and expressed as a percentage of a normal infant therapeutic dose. Sixty-six studies were included in five antibiotic groups (broad-spectrum penicillin, cephalosporins, macrolides and lincosamides, quinolones and sulphonamides). Cephalosporins were the most studied group of antibiotics (n = 21). Fifteen studies met all the criteria of "mother exposure to antibiotic". Six studies met every criterion related to "plasma sampling". Only one case report met all listed criteria for lactation studies. The correct calculation of infant exposure to antibiotics via the milk:plasma ratio (AUC) varies between 13% for macrolides and 38% for broad-spectrum penicillin. The highest assessed exposure as a percentage of infant therapeutic dose was for metronidazole (11%). The studies meet to a limited extent with the quality standards for lactation research. The breastfed infants are exposed to a subtherapeutic concentration of antibiotics.

Use of macrolides in mother and child and risk of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: nationwide cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association between use of macrolide antibiotics in mothers and infants from pregnancy onset until 120 days after birth and infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS).

DESIGN

Nationwide register based cohort study.

SETTING

Denmark, 1996-2011.

PARTICIPANTS

999,378 liveborn singletons and linked individual level information on macrolide prescriptions (maternal use during pregnancy, n=30,091; maternal use after birth, n=21,557; use in infants, n=6591), surgery for IHPS, and potential confounders.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Surgery for IHPS by three categories of macrolide use: in mothers during pregnancy, in mothers after birth, and in infants after birth.

RESULTS

880 infants developed IHPS (0.9 cases per 1000 births). Compared with infants with no use of macrolides, the adjusted rate ratio for IHPS in infants with use of macrolides during days 0 to 13 after birth was 29.8 (95% confidence interval 16.4 to 54.1) and during days 14 to 120 was 3.24 (1.20 to 8.74); the corresponding absolute risk differences were 24.4 (95% confidence interval 13.0 to 44.1) and 0.65 (0.06 to 2.21) cases per 1000 infants exposed to macrolides, respectively. The rate ratio for maternal use of macrolides for days 0 to 13 after birth was 3.49 (1.92 to 6.34) and for days 14 to 120 was 0.70 (0.26 to 1.90); the corresponding absolute risk differences were 2.15 (0.82 to 4.64) and -0.11 (-0.26 to 0.31). The rate ratios for maternal use of macrolides during pregnancy were 1.02 (0.65 to 1.59) for weeks 0 to 27 and 1.77 (0.95 to 3.31) for weeks 28 to birth; the corresponding absolute risk differences were 0.01 (-0.31 to 0.50) and 0.67 (-0.06 to 2.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of young infants with macrolide antibiotics was strongly associated with IHPS and should therefore only be administered if potential treatment benefits outweigh the risk. Maternal use of macrolides during the first two weeks after birth was also associated with an increased risk of IHPS. A possible association was also found with use during late pregnancy.

The safety of macrolides during lactation

BACKGROUND

Infantile exposure to macrolides has been associated with hypertrophic pyloric stenosis causing projectile vomiting, dehydration, electrolyte abnormalities, and in rare cases death possibly via macrolide interaction with gastric motilin receptors. Large population-based cohorts have suggested that exposure to macrolides via breastmilk may be associated with pyloric stenosis.

METHODS

In this prospective, controlled observational study designed to assess the safety of macrolides during lactation, we followed infants whose mothers contacted our Drug Consultation Center at the Assaf Harofeh Medical Center (Zerrifin, Israel) inquiring about safety of macrolides during lactation and compared them to a cohort of infants exposed to amoxicillin during breastfeeding.

RESULTS

Fifty-five infants exposed to macrolide antibiotics were compared to a control cohort of 36 infants exposed to amoxicillin via lactation. The infants in the macrolide group were all exposed to erythromycin and the newer macrolides: azithromycin, clarithromycin, and roxithromycin. The rate of adverse reactions the infant experienced while being exposed to both antibiotics was comparable. Seven (12.7%) infants in the macrolide group experienced adverse reactions versus three infants (8.3%) in the amoxicillin group (odds ratio = 1.6, 95% confidence interval, 0.38-6.65, p = 0.73). The adverse reactions in the infants exposed to macrolides were rash, diarrhea, loss of appetite, and somnolence, whereas the infants exposed to amoxicillin experienced rashes and somnolence. Factors such as gestational age, age and weight at exposure, maternal age, or type of macrolide were not associated with the infant's adverse reaction in multivariate regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Rates and types of minor adverse reactions in breastfed infants exposed to a macrolide or amoxicillin in breastmilk were comparable. Macrolide exposure during breastfeeding was not associated with pyloric stenosis, although larger prospective studies are required to confirm our observation.

Gastrointestinal medications in pregnancy

Management of the pregnant patient presents unique challenges to the treating physician. Current Food and Drug Administration classifications do not necessarily reflect clinical experience or recent literature. Ideally, one should use the lowest-risk drug possible, with attention to the appropriate level of efficacy for the patient's condition, the stage of pregnancy and dose adjustment. Every treatment decision should be fully discussed with the patient and a multidisciplinary team that should include the obstetrician and, if appropriate, the paediatrician. This review will cover the medications commonly used to treat gastrointestinal disease. The majority of medications can be categorised as 'low risk' or 'should be avoided'. The following medications should never be used during pregnancy due to the clear risk of teratogenicity or adverse events: bismuth, castor oil, sodium bicarbonate, methotrexate, ribavirin, doxycycline, tetracycline, and thalidomide.

American gastroenterological association institute technical review on the use of gastrointestinal medications in pregnancy

This literature review and the recommendations therein were prepared for the American Gastroenterological Association Institute Clinical Practice and Economics Committee. The paper was approved by the Committee on February 22, 2006 and by the AGA Institute Governing Board on April 20, 2006.

Antibiotics and breast-feeding: a critical review of the literature

Continuous breast-feeding, an integral component of the postpartum period, is often threatened upon maternal initiation of antibiotics. The real risk of antibiotic use while breast-feeding must be carefully analysed with regard to all the variables that influence the extent of antibiotic distribution into breast milk, including breast milk composition, physicochemical properties of the antibiotic (molecular weight, lipid solubility, pH, protein binding), length of feeding, and maternal disposition. In addition, infant disposition, including ability to absorb, metabolize, eliminate, and tolerate any amounts of antibiotic, must also be considered prior to maternal administration of antibiotic. The milk to plasma (M/P) ratio is a frequently quoted parameter used to predict drug distribution into breast milk. However, its utility is questionable and often fraught with misinterpretation. An alternative approach when the amount of antibiotic concentration in breast milk is known (through clinical trials) is to calculate an estimated or expected infant drug exposure factoring in known/expected milk consumption, drug concentration and bioavailability. In this review, the following antibiotic classes and current literature regarding their distribution into breast milk are critically reviewed: beta-lactam antibiotics, fluoroquinolones, sulfonamides, macrolides, aminoglycosides, tetracyclines, nitrofurantoin, metronidazole, vancomycin, clindamycin and chloramphenicol. In the majority of instances, these antibiotics do not distribute into breast milk in sufficient concentrations to be of any clinical consequence in the breast-feeding infant.

Use of Antibiotic and Analgesic Drugs during Lactation

During lactation, multiple situations can arise that require maternal pharmacological treatment. Because of the many health advantages of human milk to infants, breast feeding should be interrupted only when the needed drug might be harmful to the nursing child and exposure via the breast milk will be sufficient to pose a risk. Since the majority of drugs have not been shown to cause adverse effects when used during lactation, and even temporary interruption of breast feeding can be difficult for the nursing dyad, decisions regarding maternal medication use during breast feeding should be based on accurate and up-to-date information. This article reviews available data on the most commonly used antibiotics and analgesics. The use of most antibiotics is considered compatible with breast feeding. Penicillins, aminopenicillins, clavulanic acid, cephalosporins, macrolides and metronidazole at dosages at the low end of the recommended dosage range are considered appropriate for use for lactating women. Fluoroquinolones should not be administered as first-line treatment, but if they are indicated, breast feeding should not be interrupted because the risk of adverse effects is low and the risks are justified. Paracetamol (acetaminophen), low-dose aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) [up to 100 mg/day] and short-term treatment with NSAIDs, codeine, morphine and propoxyphene are considered compatible with breast feeding. Safer alternatives should be considered instead of dipyrone, aspirin at a dosage >100 mg/day and pethidine (meperidine). In the light of the many safe alternatives for pain control, breast-feeding mothers should not be allowed to experience pain or be made to feel that they must choose between analgesia and breast feeding.

Clarithromycin. A review of its efficacy in the treatment of respiratory tract infections in immunocompetent patients

Clarithromycin is a broad spectrum macrolide antibacterial agent active in vitro and effective in vivo against the major pathogens responsible for respiratory tract infections in immunocompetent patients. It is highly active in vitro against pathogens causing atypical pneumonia (Chlamydia pneumoniae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Legionella spp.) and has similar activity to other macrolides against Staphylococcus aureus. Streptococcus pyogenes, Moraxella catarrhalis and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Haemophilus influenzae is susceptible or intermediately susceptible to clarithromycin alone, but activity is enhanced when the parent drug and metabolite are combined in vitro. Absorption of clarithromycin is unaffected by food. More than half of an oral dose is systemically available as the parent drug and the active 14-hydroxy metabolite. Pharmacokinetics are nonlinear, with plasma concentrations increasing in more than proportion to the dosage. First-pass metabolism results in the rapid appearance of the active metabolite 14-hydroxy-clarithromycin in plasma. Clarithromycin and its active metabolite are found in greater concentrations in the tissues and fluids of the respiratory tract than in plasma. Dosage adjustments are required for patients with severe renal failure, but not for elderly patients or those with hepatic impairment. Drug interactions related to the cytochrome P450 system may occur with clarithromycin use. In addition to the standard immediate-release formulation for administration twice daily, a modified-release formulation of clarithromycin is now available for use once daily. In dosages of 500 to 1000 mg/day for 5 to 14 days, clarithromycin was as effective in the treatment of community-acquired upper and lower respiratory tract infections in hospital and community settings as beta-lactam agents (with or without a beta-lactamase inhibitor), cephalosporins and most other macrolides. Clarithromycin was similar in efficacy to azithromycin in comparative studies and is as effective as and better tolerated than erythromycin. Adverse events are primarily gastrointestinal in nature, but result in fewer withdrawals from therapy than are seen with erythromycin. Clarithromycin provides similar clinical and bacteriological efficacy to that seen with beta-lactam agents, cephalosporins and other macrolides. It offers a cost-saving alternative to intravenous erythromycin use in US hospitals and is available in both once-daily and twice-daily formulations. The spectrum of activity of clarithromycin against common and emerging respiratory tract pathogens may make it suitable for use in the community as empirical therapy of respiratory tract infections in both children and adults.

Serum and cellular pharmacokinetics of clarithromycin 500 mg q.d. and 250 mg b.i.d. in volunteers

In an open-label, randomized, crossover study 12 healthy volunteers were given clarithromycin orally 250 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) and 500 mg once a day (q.d.). Blood and saliva samples were collected on study days 1 and 5 to determine the pharmacokinetics of clarithromycin and its 14-hydroxy metabolite in plasma and saliva, and to measure concentrations of clarithromycin in mononuclear cells (MNCs) and polymorphonuclear leucocytes (PMNs). The mean peak levels of clarithromycin on day 5 of therapy in serum (2.3 vs. 1.2 mg/l), saliva (1.1 vs. 0.3 mg/l) and blood cells 60 vs. 26 mg/l in MNCs and 29 vs. 14 mg/l in PMNs) were at least doubled, the trough levels were lower with 500 mg q.d. vs. 250 mg b.i.d. (0.09 vs. 0.28 mg/l in serum; 0.06 vs. 0.13 mg/l in saliva; < 1 vs. 6.8 mg/l in MNCs; 0.8 vs. 2.8 mg/l in PMNs). The mean relative peak serum concentrations of the 14-hydroxy metabolite were somewhat lower with the 500 mg dosage (0.78 vs. 0.46 mg/l). The peak concentrations of clarithromycin and its 14-hydroxy metabolite in saliva were 25-40% and 50-80% of the maximum serum concentrations with both dosage regimens. Clarithromycin exhibits good and rapid penetration into intracellular as well as into extravasal extracellular body compartments. Clarithromycin 500 mg q.d. compares favourably with 250 mg b.i.d., as far as peak serum levels and bioavailability are concerned, but trough levels are lower at the end of the 24-hour dosing interval.