Laparoscopy in Crohn's disease

Surgical and non-surgical risk factors affecting the insufficiency of ileocolic anastomosis after first-time surgery in Crohn's disease patients

BACKGROUND

Crohn's disease (CD) often necessitates surgical intervention, particularly when it manifests in the terminal ileum and ileocecal valve. Despite undergoing radical surgery, a subset of patients experiences recurrent inflammation at the anastomotic site, necessitating further medical attention.

AIM

To investigate the risk factors associated with anastomotic insufficiency following ileocecal resection in CD patients.

METHODS

This study enrolled 77 patients who underwent open ileocolic resection with primary stapled anastomosis. Patients were stratified into two groups: Group I comprised individuals without anastomotic insufficiency, while Group II included patients exhibiting advanced anastomotic destruction observed endoscopically or those requiring additional surgery during the follow-up period. Surgical and non-surgical factors potentially influencing anastomotic failure were evaluated in both cohorts.

RESULTS

Anastomotic insufficiency was detected in 12 patients (15.6%), with a mean time interval of 30 months between the initial surgery and recurrence. The predominant reasons for re-intervention included stenosis and excessive perianastomotic lesions. Factors associated with a heightened risk of anastomotic failure encompassed prolonged postoperative obstruction, anastomotic bleeding, and clinically confirmed micro-leakage. Additionally, patients in Group II exhibited preoperative malnutrition and early recurrence of symptoms related to CD.

CONCLUSION

Successful surgical outcomes hinge on the attainment of a fully functional anastomosis, optimal metabolic status, and clinical remission of the underlying disease. Vigilant endoscopic surveillance following primary resection facilitates the timely identification of anastomotic failure, thereby enabling noninvasive interventions.

Indications, Postoperative Management, and Long-term Prognosis of Crohn's Disease After Ileocecal Resection: A Multicenter Study Comparing the East and West

BACKGROUND

The Crohn's disease (CD) phenotype differs between Asian and Western countries and may affect disease management, including decisions on surgery. This study aimed to compare the indications, postoperative management, and long-term prognosis after ileocecal resection (ICR) in Hong Kong (HK) and the Netherlands (NL).

METHODS

CD patients with primary ICR between 2000 and 2019 were included. The endpoints were endoscopic (Rutgeerts score ≥i2b and/or radiologic recurrence), clinical (start or switch of inflammatory bowel disease medication), and surgical recurrences. Cumulative incidences of recurrence were estimated with a Bayesian multivariable proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Eighty HK and 822 NL patients were included. The most common indication for ICR was penetrating disease (HK: 32.5%, NL: 22.5%) in HK vs stricturing disease (HK: 32.5%, NL: 48.8%) in the NL (P < .001). Postoperative prophylaxis was prescribed to 65 (81.3%) HK patients (28 [35.0%] aminosalicylates [5-aminosalicylic acid]; 30 [37.5%] immunomodulators; 0 biologicals) vs 388 (47.1%) NL patients (67 [8.2%] 5-aminosalicylic acid; 187 [22.8%] immunomodulators; 69 [8.4%] biologicals; 50 [6.1%] combination therapy) (P < .001). Endoscopic or radiologic evaluation within 18 months was performed in 36.3% HK vs 64.1% NL (P < .001) patients. No differences between both populations were observed for endoscopic (hazard ratio [HR], 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-1.21), clinical (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.62-1.32), or surgical (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.31-1.13) recurrence risks.

CONCLUSION

The main indication for ICR in CD patients is penetrating disease in HK patients and stricturing disease in NL patients. Although considerable pre- and postoperative management differences were observed between the two geographical areas, the long-term prognosis after ICR is similar.