1
|
van Linschoten RCA, Jansen FM, Pauwels RWM, Smits LJT, Atsma F, Kievit W, de Jong DJ, de Vries AC, Boekema PJ, West RL, Bodelier AGL, Gisbertz IAM, Wolfhagen FHJ, Römkens TEH, Lutgens MWMD, van Bodegraven AA, Oldenburg B, Pierik MJ, Russel MGVM, de Boer NK, Mallant-Hent RC, Ter Borg PCJ, van der Meulen-de Jong AE, Jansen JM, Jansen SV, Tan ACITL, van der Woude CJ, Hoentjen F. A Prediction Model for Successful Increase of Adalimumab Dose Intervals in Patients with Crohn's Disease: Secondary Analysis of the Pragmatic Open-Label Randomised Controlled Non-inferiority LADI Trial. Dig Dis Sci 2024:10.1007/s10620-024-08410-z. [PMID: 38594435 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-024-08410-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the pragmatic open-label randomised controlled non-inferiority LADI trial we showed that increasing adalimumab (ADA) dose intervals was non-inferior to conventional dosing for persistent flares in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) in clinical and biochemical remission. AIMS To develop a prediction model to identify patients who can successfully increase their ADA dose interval based on secondary analysis of trial data. METHODS Patients in the intervention group of the LADI trial increased ADA intervals to 3 and then to 4 weeks. The dose interval increase was defined as successful when patients had no persistent flare (> 8 weeks), no intervention-related severe adverse events, no rescue medication use during the study, and were on an increased dose interval while in clinical and biochemical remission at week 48. Prediction models were based on logistic regression with relaxed LASSO. Models were internally validated using bootstrap optimism correction. RESULTS We included 109 patients, of which 60.6% successfully increased their dose interval. Patients that were active smokers (odds ratio [OR] 0.90), had previous CD-related intra-abdominal surgeries (OR 0.85), proximal small bowel disease (OR 0.92), an increased Harvey-Bradshaw Index (OR 0.99) or increased faecal calprotectin (OR 0.997) were less likely to successfully increase their dose interval. The model had fair discriminative ability (AUC = 0.63) and net benefit analysis showed that the model could be used to select patients who could increase their dose interval. CONCLUSION The final prediction model seems promising to select patients who could successfully increase their ADA dose interval. The model should be validated externally before it may be applied in clinical practice. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03172377.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reinier C A van Linschoten
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fenna M Jansen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Renske W M Pauwels
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lisa J T Smits
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Femke Atsma
- Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Wietske Kievit
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Science, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk J de Jong
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Annemarie C de Vries
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paul J Boekema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maxima Medical Center, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Rachel L West
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ingrid A M Gisbertz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Bernhoven Hospital, Uden, The Netherlands
| | - Frank H J Wolfhagen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa E H Römkens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 'S-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Maurice W M D Lutgens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Elisabeth Twee Steden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Adriaan A van Bodegraven
- Department of Gastroenterology, Geriatrics, Internal and Intensive Care Medicine (Co-MIK), Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen/Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Oldenburg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke J Pierik
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Center +, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maurice G V M Russel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Twente, The Netherlands
| | - Nanne K de Boer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Pieter C J Ter Borg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jeroen M Jansen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sita V Jansen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Adrianus C I T L Tan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CWZ Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Frank Hoentjen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, 2-20A Zeidler Ledcor Centre, 8540-112 Street NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2P8, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bak MTJ, Hammoudi N, Allez M, Silverberg MS, Schellekens IM, Erler NS, Dijkstra G, Romberg-Camps M, de Boer NKH, Jansen SV, van der Marel S, Horjus CS, Visschedijk MC, Goetgebuer RL, van Dop WA, Hoekstra J, Bodelier AGL, Molendijk I, Derikx LAAP, van Schaik FDM, West RL, Duijvestein M, van der Woude CJ, van Ruler O, de Vries AC. Interobserver agreement of current and new proposed endoscopic scores for postoperative recurrence in Crohn's disease. Gastrointest Endosc 2024:S0016-5107(24)00164-0. [PMID: 38462057 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Revised: 02/17/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The modified Rutgeerts' score (mRS) is widely used for the assessment of endoscopic postoperative recurrence (ePOR) in Crohn's disease (CD) after ileocolic resection to guide therapeutic decisions. To improve the validity and prognostic value of this endoscopic assessment, two new scores have been proposed. This study assessed the interobserver agreement of the current (mRS) and new endoscopic scores for ePOR in CD. METHODS Sixteen Dutch academic and non-academic IBD specialists assessed endoscopic videos (n=71) of postoperative CD patients (n=66) retrieved from nine Dutch centers. Each video was assessed for the degree of inflammation by four gastroenterologists using the mRS and the new proposed endoscopic score: REMIND score (separate score of anastomosis and neoterminal ileum) and updated Rutgeerts score (assessment of lesions at the anastomotic line, ileal inlet, ileal body and neoterminal ileum). In addition, lesions at the ileal body, ileal inlet, neoterminal ileum, colonic and/or ileal blind loop were separately assessed. Interobserver agreement was assessed using Fleiss' weighted kappa. RESULTS Fleiss' weighted kappa for the mRS was 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.74). The weighted kappa for the REMIND score was 0.73 (95% CI 0.65-0.80) for lesions in the neoterminal ileum and 0.46 (95% CI 0.35-0.58) for anastomotic lesions. The weighted kappa for the updated Rutgeerts' score was 0.69 (95% CI 0.62-0.77). The weighted kappa for lesions in the ileal body, ileal inlet, neoterminal ileum, colonic and ileal blind loop was 0.61 (95% CI 0.49-0.73), 0.63 (95% CI 0.54-0.72), 0.61 (95% CI 0.49-0.74), 0.83 (95% CI 0.62-1.00) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.46-0.89). CONCLUSION The interobserver agreement of the mRS is substantial. Similarly, the interobserver agreement is substantial for the updated Rutgeerts' score. According to the REMIND score, the interobserver agreement was substantial for lesions in the neoterminal ileum, whereas only moderate for anastomotic lesions. Since therapeutic decisions in clinical practice are based on these assessments and these scores are used as outcome measure in clinical studies, further improvement of the interobserver agreement is essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michiel T J Bak
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nassim Hammoudi
- Gastroenterology Department, Hôpital Saint-Louis - APHP, Université Paris Cité, INSERM U1160, Paris, France
| | - Matthieu Allez
- Gastroenterology Department, Hôpital Saint-Louis - APHP, Université Paris Cité, INSERM U1160, Paris, France
| | - Mark S Silverberg
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Isa M Schellekens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nicole S Erler
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gerard Dijkstra
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Mariëlle Romberg-Camps
- Department of Gastroenterology, Geriatrics, Internal and Intensive Care Medicine (Co-MIK), Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen-Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands
| | - Nanne K H de Boer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, AGEM Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sita V Jansen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Reinier de Graaf Groep, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Sander van der Marel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Carmen S Horjus
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands
| | - Marijn C Visschedijk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Rogier L Goetgebuer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Willemijn A van Dop
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Jildou Hoekstra
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ilse Molendijk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lauranne A A P Derikx
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Fiona D M van Schaik
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Rachel L West
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marjolijn Duijvestein
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - C Janneke van der Woude
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Oddeke van Ruler
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Annemarie C de Vries
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jansen FM, van Linschoten RCA, Kievit W, Smits LJT, Pauwels RWM, de Jong DJ, de Vries AC, Boekema PJ, West RL, Bodelier AGL, Gisbertz IAM, Wolfhagen FHJ, Römkens TEH, Lutgens MWMD, van Bodegraven AA, Oldenburg B, Pierik MJ, Russel MGVM, de Boer NK, Mallant-Hent RC, ter Borg PCJ, van der Meulen-de Jong AE, Jansen JM, Jansen SV, Tan ACITL, Hoentjen F, van der Woude CJ. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Increased Adalimumab Dose Intervals in Crohn's Disease Patients in Stable Remission: The Randomized Controlled LADI Trial. J Crohns Colitis 2023; 17:1771-1780. [PMID: 37310877 PMCID: PMC10673815 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS We aimed to assess cost-effectiveness of increasing adalimumab dose intervals compared to the conventional dosing interval in patients with Crohn's disease [CD] in stable clinical and biochemical remission. DESIGN We conducted a pragmatic, open-label, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial, comparing increased adalimumab intervals with the 2-weekly interval in adult CD patients in clinical remission. Quality of life was measured with the EQ-5D-5L. Costs were measured from a societal perspective. Results are shown as differences and incremental net monetary benefit [iNMB] at relevant willingness to accept [WTA] levels. RESULTS We randomized 174 patients to the intervention [n = 113] and control [n = 61] groups. No difference was found in utility (difference: -0.017, 95% confidence interval [-0.044; 0.004]) and total costs (-€943, [-€2226; €1367]) over the 48-week study period between the two groups. Medication costs per patient were lower (-€2545, [-€2780; -€2192]) in the intervention group, but non-medication healthcare (+€474, [+€149; +€952]) and patient costs (+€365 [+€92; €1058]) were higher. Cost-utility analysis showed that the iNMB was €594 [-€2099; €2050], €69 [-€2908; €1965] and -€455 [-€4,096; €1984] at WTA levels of €20 000, €50 000 and €80 000, respectively. Increasing adalimumab dose intervals was more likely to be cost-effective at WTA levels below €53 960 per quality-adjusted life year. Above €53 960 continuing the conventional dose interval was more likely to be cost-effective. CONCLUSION When the loss of a quality-adjusted life year is valued at less than €53 960, increasing the adalimumab dose interval is a cost-effective strategy in CD patients in stable clinical and biochemical remission. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03172377.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fenna M Jansen
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Reinier C A van Linschoten
- Erasmus MC, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wietske Kievit
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Science, Department for Health Evidence, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lisa J T Smits
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Renske W M Pauwels
- Erasmus MC, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk J de Jong
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Annemarie C de Vries
- Erasmus MC, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paul J Boekema
- Maxima Medical Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Rachel L West
- Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ingrid A M Gisbertz
- Bernhoven Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Uden, The Netherlands
| | - Frank H J Wolfhagen
- Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa E H Römkens
- Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, ‘s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Maurice W M D Lutgens
- Elisabeth Tweesteden Ziekenhuis, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Adriaan A van Bodegraven
- Zuyderland Medical Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Geriatrics, Internal and Intensive Care Medicine (Co-MIK), Sittard-Geleen/Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Oldenburg
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke J Pierik
- Maastricht University Medical Center+, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maurice G V M Russel
- Medisch Spectrum Twente, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Twente, The Netherlands
| | - Nanne K de Boer
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije University Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, AGEM Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Pieter C J ter Borg
- Ikazia Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jeroen M Jansen
- OLVG, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sita V Jansen
- Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Adrianus C I T L Tan
- Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Hoentjen
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Beelen EMJ, Arkenbosch JHC, Erler NS, Sleutjes JAM, Hoentjen F, Bodelier AGL, Dijkstra G, Romberg-Camps M, de Boer NK, Stassen LPS, van der Meulen AE, West R, van Ruler O, van der Woude CJ, de Vries AC. Impact of timing of primary ileocecal resection on prognosis in patients with Crohn's disease. BJS Open 2023; 7:zrad097. [PMID: 37772836 PMCID: PMC10540509 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The advantage of early ileocecal resection after Crohn's disease diagnosis is a matter of debate. This study aims to assess the timing of ileocecal resection on prognosis, after correction for possible confounders. METHODS Patients with Crohn's disease with primary ileocecal resection between 2000 and 2019 were included in a retrospective multicentre cohort. The primary endpoint was endoscopic recurrence (Rutgeerts score ≥i2b) within 18 months. Secondary endpoints were escalation of inflammatory bowel disease medication within 18 months and re-resection during follow-up. The association between timing of ileocecal resection and these endpoints was investigated using multivariable proportional hazard models, corrected for covariates including Montreal classification, postoperative prophylaxis, smoking, indication for surgery, medication before ileocecal resection, perianal fistulas, surgical approach, histology, length of resected segment and calendar year. RESULTS In 822 patients ileocecal resection was performed after a median of 3.1 years (i.q.r. 0.7-8.0) after Crohn's disease diagnosis. The lowest incidence of endoscopic recurrence, escalation of inflammatory bowel disease medication and re-resection was observed for patients undergoing ileocecal resection shortly after diagnosis (0-1 months). After correction for covariates, patients with ileocecal resection at 0, 4 and 12 months after diagnosis had a cumulative incidence of 35 per cent, 48 per cent and 39 per cent for endoscopic recurrence, 20 per cent, 29 per cent and 28 per cent for escalation of inflammatory bowel disease medication and 20 per cent, 30 per cent and 34 per cent for re-resection, respectively. In the multivariable model ileocolonic disease (HR 1.39 (95 per cent c.i. 1.05 to 1.86)), microscopic inflammation of proximal and distal resection margins (HR 2.20 (95 per cent c.i. 1.21 to 3.87)) and postoperative prophylactic biological and immunomodulator (HR 0.16 (95 per cent c.i. 0.05 to 0.43)) were associated with endoscopic recurrence. CONCLUSION The timing of ileocecal resection was not associated with a change of disease course; in the multivariable model, the postoperative recurrence was not affected by timing of ileocecal resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelien M J Beelen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeanine H C Arkenbosch
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole S Erler
- Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jasmijn A M Sleutjes
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Hoentjen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Gerard Dijkstra
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marielle Romberg-Camps
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands
| | - Nanne K de Boer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, AGEM Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Laurents P S Stassen
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Andrea E van der Meulen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Rachel West
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fransiscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Oddeke van Ruler
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands
| | - C Janneke van der Woude
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annemarie C de Vries
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van Linschoten RCA, Jansen FM, Pauwels RWM, Smits LJT, Atsma F, Kievit W, de Jong DJ, de Vries AC, Boekema PJ, West RL, Bodelier AGL, Gisbertz IAM, Wolfhagen FHJ, Römkens TEH, Lutgens MWMD, van Bodegraven AA, Oldenburg B, Pierik MJ, Russel MGVM, de Boer NK, Mallant-Hent RC, Ter Borg PCJ, van der Meulen-de Jong AE, Jansen JM, Jansen SV, Tan ACITL, van der Woude CJ, Hoentjen F. Increased versus conventional adalimumab dose interval for patients with Crohn's disease in stable remission (LADI): a pragmatic, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 8:343-355. [PMID: 36736339 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(22)00434-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Revised: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite its effectiveness in treating Crohn's disease, adalimumab is associated with an increased risk of infections and high health-care costs. We aimed to assess clinical outcomes of increased adalimumab dose intervals versus conventional dosing in patients with Crohn's disease in stable remission. METHODS The LADI study was a pragmatic, open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority, parallel, randomised controlled trial, done in six academic hospitals and 14 general hospitals in the Netherlands. Adults (aged ≥18 years) diagnosed with luminal Crohn's disease (with or without concomitant perianal disease) were eligible when in steroid-free clinical and biochemical remission (defined as Harvey-Bradshaw Index [HBI] score <5, faecal calprotectin <150 μg/g, and C-reactive protein <10 mg/L) for at least 9 months on a stable dose of 40 mg subcutaneous adalimumab every 2 weeks. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to the intervention group or control group by the coordinating investigator using a secure web-based system with variable block randomisation (block sizes of 6, 9, and 12). Randomisation was stratified on concomitant use of thiopurines and methotrexate. Patients and health-care providers were not masked to group assignment. Patients allocated to the intervention group increased adalimumab dose intervals to 40 mg every 3 weeks at baseline and further to every 4 weeks if they remained in clinical and biochemical remission at week 24. Patients in the control group continued their 2-weekly dose interval. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of persistent flares at week 48 defined as the presence of at least two of the following criteria: HBI score of 5 or more, C-reactive protein 10 mg/L or more, and faecal calprotectin more than 250 μg/g for more than 8 weeks and a concurrent decrease in the adalimumab dose interval or start of escape medication. The non-inferiority margin was 15% on a risk difference scale. All analyses were done in the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03172377, and is not recruiting. FINDINGS Between May 3, 2017, and July 6, 2020, 174 patients were randomly assigned to the intervention group (n=113) or the control group (n=61). Four patients from the intervention group and one patient from the control group were excluded from the analysis for not meeting inclusion criteria. 85 (50%) of 169 participants were female and 84 (50%) were male. At week 48, the cumulative incidence of persistent flares in the intervention group (three [3%] of 109) was non-inferior compared with the control group (zero; pooled adjusted risk difference 1·86% [90% CI -0·35 to 4·07). Seven serious adverse events occurred, all in the intervention group, of which two (both patients with intestinal obstruction) were possibly related to the intervention. Per 100 person-years, 168·35 total adverse events, 59·99 infection-related adverse events, and 42·57 gastrointestinal adverse events occurred in the intervention group versus 134·67, 75·03, and 5·77 in the control group, respectively. INTERPRETATION The individual benefit of increasing adalimumab dose intervals versus the risk of disease recurrence is a trade-off that should take patient preferences regarding medication and the risk of a flare into account. FUNDING Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reinier C A van Linschoten
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Fenna M Jansen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Renske W M Pauwels
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Lisa J T Smits
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Femke Atsma
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Wietske Kievit
- Radboud institute for Health Science, Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Dirk J de Jong
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Annemarie C de Vries
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Paul J Boekema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maxima Medical Center, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Rachel L West
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Ingrid A M Gisbertz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Bernhoven Hospital, Uden, Netherlands
| | - Frank H J Wolfhagen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands
| | - Tessa E H Römkens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
| | - Maurice W M D Lutgens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Elisabeth Twee Steden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, Netherlands
| | - Adriaan A van Bodegraven
- Department of Gastroenterology, Geriatrics, Internal and Intensive Care Medicine (Co-MIK), Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen/Heerlen, Netherlands
| | - Bas Oldenburg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Marieke J Pierik
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Maurice G V M Russel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Twente, Netherlands
| | - Nanne K de Boer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Pieter C J Ter Borg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Jeroen M Jansen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, OLVG, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sita V Jansen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, Netherlands
| | - Adrianus C I T L Tan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CWZ Hospital, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | | - Frank Hoentjen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Straatmijer T, van Schaik FDM, Bodelier AGL, Visschedijk M, de Vries AC, Ponsioen CY, Pierik M, van Bodegraven AA, West RL, de Boer NKH, Srivastava N, Romkens TEH, Hoekstra J, Oldenburg B, Dijkstra G, van der Woude JC, Löwenberg M, Mujagic Z, Biemans VBC, van der Meulen-de Jong AE, Duijvestein M. Effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib for ulcerative colitis: two-year results of the ICC Registry. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2023; 57:117-126. [PMID: 36282200 PMCID: PMC10092078 DOI: 10.1111/apt.17248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Revised: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor and is registered for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). The effectiveness of tofacitinib has been evaluated up to 12 months of treatment. AIM The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of 24 months of tofacitinib use in UC patients in the Netherlands. METHODS Patients initiating tofacitinib treatment were included in the ICC Registry, a nationwide, observational registry. Patients were prospectively evaluated for up to 24 months. The primary outcome was corticosteroid-free clinical remission (CSFR, Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index [SCCAI] ≤2) at week 104. Secondary outcomes included biochemical remission (C-reactive protein (CRP) ≤5 mg/L and faecal calprotectin (FC) ≤250 μg/g), safety, and discontinuation rate. RESULTS We included 110 patients of whom 104 (94.5%) were anti-TNF experienced. After 104 weeks of tofacitinib, 31.8% (34/107) were in CSFR, 23.4% (25/107) in biochemical remission and 18.7% (20/107) in combined clinical and biochemical remission. Of the patients in CSFR at week 52, 76.5% (26/34) remained so after 104 weeks of treatment. Sixty-one patients (55.5%) discontinued tofacitinib after a median duration of 13 weeks (IQR 7-34). The main reasons for discontinuation were non-response (59%), loss of response (14.8%), and adverse events (18%). There were 33.9 possible tofacitinib-related adverse events per 100 patient-years during follow-up. Adverse events most probably related to tofacitinib were skin reactions and headaches. There were 6.4 herpes zoster infections per 100 patient-years. CONCLUSION Tofacitinib was effective in 31.8% of patients after 24 months of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa Straatmijer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism (AGEM) Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Marijn Visschedijk
- University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Cyriel Y Ponsioen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism (AGEM) Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke Pierik
- Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ad A van Bodegraven
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Zuyderland Hospital, Sittard, The Netherlands
| | - Rachel L West
- Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nanne K H de Boer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism (AGEM) Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Bas Oldenburg
- University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Gerard Dijkstra
- University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Mark Löwenberg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism (AGEM) Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Zlatan Mujagic
- Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Arkenbosch JHC, Mak JWY, Ho JCL, Beelen EMJ, Erler NS, Hoentjen F, Bodelier AGL, Dijkstra G, Romberg-Camps M, de Boer NKH, Stassen LPS, van der Meulen AE, West R, van Ruler O, van der Woude CJ, Ng SC, de Vries AC. Indications, Postoperative Management, and Long-term Prognosis of Crohn's Disease After Ileocecal Resection: A Multicenter Study Comparing the East and West. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2022; 28:S16-S24. [PMID: 34969091 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izab316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Crohn's disease (CD) phenotype differs between Asian and Western countries and may affect disease management, including decisions on surgery. This study aimed to compare the indications, postoperative management, and long-term prognosis after ileocecal resection (ICR) in Hong Kong (HK) and the Netherlands (NL). METHODS CD patients with primary ICR between 2000 and 2019 were included. The endpoints were endoscopic (Rutgeerts score ≥i2b and/or radiologic recurrence), clinical (start or switch of inflammatory bowel disease medication), and surgical recurrences. Cumulative incidences of recurrence were estimated with a Bayesian multivariable proportional hazards model. RESULTS Eighty HK and 822 NL patients were included. The most common indication for ICR was penetrating disease (HK: 32.5%, NL: 22.5%) in HK vs stricturing disease (HK: 32.5%, NL: 48.8%) in the NL (P < .001). Postoperative prophylaxis was prescribed to 65 (81.3%) HK patients (28 [35.0%] aminosalicylates [5-aminosalicylic acid]; 30 [37.5%] immunomodulators; 0 biologicals) vs 388 (47.1%) NL patients (67 [8.2%] 5-aminosalicylic acid; 187 [22.8%] immunomodulators; 69 [8.4%] biologicals; 50 [6.1%] combination therapy) (P < .001). Endoscopic or radiologic evaluation within 18 months was performed in 36.3% HK vs 64.1% NL (P < .001) patients. No differences between both populations were observed for endoscopic (hazard ratio [HR], 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-1.21), clinical (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.62-1.32), or surgical (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.31-1.13) recurrence risks. CONCLUSION The main indication for ICR in CD patients is penetrating disease in HK patients and stricturing disease in NL patients. Although considerable pre- and postoperative management differences were observed between the two geographical areas, the long-term prognosis after ICR is similar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanine H C Arkenbosch
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joyce W Y Mak
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Jacky C L Ho
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Evelien M J Beelen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nicole S Erler
- Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Frank Hoentjen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | | - Gerard Dijkstra
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Mariëlle Romberg-Camps
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands
| | - Nanne K H de Boer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, AGEM Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Laurents P S Stassen
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Andrea E van der Meulen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Rachel West
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Oddeke van Ruler
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Siew C Ng
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Annemarie C de Vries
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Straatmijer T, Biemans VBC, Hoentjen F, de Boer NKH, Bodelier AGL, Dijkstra G, van Dop WA, Haans JJL, Jansen JM, Maljaars PWJ, van der Marel S, Oldenburg B, Ponsioen CY, Visschedijk MC, de Vries AC, West RL, van der Woude CJ, Pierik M, Duijvestein M, van der Meulen-de Jong AE. Ustekinuma b for Crohn's Disease: Two-Year Results of the Initiative on Crohn and Colitis (ICC) Registry, a Nationwide Prospective Observational Cohort Study. J Crohns Colitis 2021; 15:1920-1930. [PMID: 33909062 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Ustekinumab is a monoclonal antibody that selectively targets p40, a shared subunit of the cytokines interleukin [IL]-12 and IL-23. It is registered for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases. We assessed the 2-year effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in a real world, prospective cohort of patients with Crohn's disease [CD]. METHODS Patients who started ustekinumab were prospectively enrolled in the nationwide Initiative on Crohn and Colitis [ICC] Registry. At weeks 0, 12, 24, 52 and 104, clinical remission Harvey Bradshaw Index≤ 4 points], biochemical remission (faecal calprotectin ≤ 200 μg/g and/or C-reactive protein ≤5 mg/L], perianal fistula remission, extra-intestinal manifestations, ustekinumab dosage and safety outcomes were determined. The primary outcome was corticosteroid-free clinical remission at week 104. RESULTS In total, 252 CD patients with at least 2 years of follow-up were included. Of all included patients, the proportion of patients in corticosteroid-free clinical remission was 32.3% [81/251], 41.4% [104/251], 39% [97/249] and 34.0% [84/247] at weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104, respectively. In patients with combined clinical and biochemical disease activity at baseline [n = 122], the corticosteroid-free clinical remission rates were 23.8% [29/122], 35.2% [43/122], 40.0% [48/120] and 32.8% [39/119] at weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104, respectively. The probability of remaining on ustekinumab treatment after 52 and 104 weeks in all patients was 64.3% and 54.8%, respectively. The main reason for discontinuing treatment after 52 weeks was loss of response [66.7%]. No new safety issues were observed. CONCLUSION After 104 weeks of ustekinumab treatment, one-third of CD patients were in corticosteroid-free clinical remission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Frank Hoentjen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Nanne K H de Boer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism (AGEM) Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Gerard Dijkstra
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Willemijn A van Dop
- Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jeoffrey J L Haans
- Department of Gastroenterology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen M Jansen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P W Jeroen Maljaars
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sander van der Marel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Haaglanden Medisch Centre, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Oldenburg
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cyriel Y Ponsioen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism (AGEM) Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marijn C Visschedijk
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Annemarie C de Vries
- Department of Gastroenterology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rachel L West
- Department of Gastroenterology, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marieke Pierik
- Department of Gastroenterology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolijn Duijvestein
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism (AGEM) Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Derikx LAAP, Lantinga MA, de Jong DJ, van Dop WA, Creemers RH, Römkens TEH, Jansen JM, Mahmmod N, West RL, Tan ACITL, Bodelier AGL, Gorter MHP, Boekema PJ, Halet ERC, Horjus CS, van Dijk MA, Hirdes MMC, Epping Stippel LSM, Jharap B, Lutgens MWMD, Russel MG, Gilissen LPL, Nauta S, van Bodegraven AA, Hoentjen F. Clinical Outcomes of Covid-19 in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Nationwide Cohort Study. J Crohns Colitis 2021; 15:529-539. [PMID: 33079178 PMCID: PMC7665430 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaa215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The COVID-19 risk and disease course in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] patients remains uncertain. Therefore, we aimed to assess the clinical presentation, disease course, and outcomes of COVID-19 in IBD patients. Second, we determined COVID-19 incidences in IBD patients and compared this with the general population. METHODS We conducted a multicentre, nationwide IBD cohort study in The Netherlands and identified patients with COVID-19. First, we assessed the COVID-19 disease course and outcomes. Second, we compared COVID-19 incidences between our IBD study cohort and the general Dutch population. RESULTS We established an IBD cohort of 34 763 patients. COVID-19 was diagnosed in 100/34 763 patients [0.29%]; 20/100 of these patients [20%] had severe COVID-19 defined as admission to the intensive care unit, mechanical ventilation, and/or death. Hospitalisation occurred in 59/100 [59.0%] patients and 13/100 [13.0%] died. All patients who died had comorbidities and all but one were ≥65 years old. In line, we identified ≥1 comorbidity as an independent risk factor for hospitalisation (odds ratio [OR] 4.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.58-11.17,; p = 0.004). Incidences of COVID-19 between the IBD study cohort and the general population were comparable (287.6 [95% CI 236.6-349.7] versus 333.0 [95% CI 329.3-336.7] per 100000 patients, respectively; p = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS Of 100 cases with IBD and COVID-19, 20% developed severe COVID-19, 59% were hospitalised and 13% died. A comparable COVID-19 risk was found between the IBD cohort [100/34 763 = 0.29%] and the general Dutch population. The presence of ≥1 comorbidities was an independent risk factor for hospitalisation due to COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauranne A A P Derikx
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marten A Lantinga
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk J de Jong
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Willemijn A van Dop
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Rob H Creemers
- Zuyderland Medical Centre, Department of Gastroenterology, Geriatrics, Internal and Intensive Care Medicine (Co-MIK), Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa E H Römkens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, ‘s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen M Jansen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nofel Mahmmod
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Rachel L West
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Adriaan C I T L Tan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Moniek H P Gorter
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Bernhoven Hospital, Uden, The Netherlands
| | - Paul J Boekema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maxima Medical Centre, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Eric R C Halet
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Bravis Hospital, Roosendaal, The Netherlands
| | - Carmen S Horjus
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten A van Dijk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stichting Elkerliek Hospital, Helmond, The Netherlands
| | - Meike M C Hirdes
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Bindia Jharap
- Department of Gastroenterology, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Maurice W M D Lutgens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Elisabeth – Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Maurice G Russel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Lennard P L Gilissen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoukje Nauta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Slingeland Hospital, Doetinchem, The Netherlands
| | - Adriaan A van Bodegraven
- Zuyderland Medical Centre, Department of Gastroenterology, Geriatrics, Internal and Intensive Care Medicine (Co-MIK), Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC -‐Location VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Hoentjen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Asscher VER, Biemans VBC, Pierik MJ, Dijkstra G, Löwenberg M, van der Marel S, de Boer NKH, Bodelier AGL, Jansen JM, West RL, Haans JJL, van Dop WA, Weersma RK, Hoentjen F, Maljaars PWJ. Comorbidity, not patient age, is associated with impaired safety outcomes in vedolizumab- and ustekinumab-treated patients with inflammatory bowel disease-a prospective multicentre cohort study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2020; 52:1366-1376. [PMID: 32901983 PMCID: PMC7539998 DOI: 10.1111/apt.16073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Revised: 04/25/2020] [Accepted: 08/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few data are available on the effects of age and comorbidity on treatment outcomes of vedolizumab and ustekinumab in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). AIMS To evaluate the association between age and comorbidity with safety and effectiveness outcomes of vedolizumab and ustekinumab in IBD. METHODS IBD patients initiating vedolizumab or ustekinumab in regular care were enrolled prospectively. Comorbidity prevalence was assessed using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Association between age and CCI, both continuously assessed, with safety outcomes (any infection, hospitalisation, adverse events) during treatment, and effectiveness outcomes (clinical response and remission, corticosteroid-free remission, clinical remission combined with biochemical remission) after 52 weeks of treatment were evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders. RESULTS We included 203 vedolizumab- and 207 ustekinumab-treated IBD patients, mean age 42.2 (SD 16.0) and 41.6 (SD 14.4). Median treatment duration 54.0 (IQR 19.9-104.0) and 48.4 (IQR 24.4-55.1) weeks, median follow-up time 104.0 (IQR 103.1-104.0) and 52.0 weeks (IQR 49.3-100.4). On vedolizumab, CCI associated independently with any infection (OR 1.387, 95% CI 1.022-1.883, P = 0.036) and hospitalisation (OR 1.586, 95% CI 1.127-2.231, P = 0.008). On ustekinumab, CCI associated independently with hospitalisation (OR 1.621, 95% CI 1.034-2.541, P = 0.035). CCI was not associated with effectiveness, and age was not associated with any outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Comorbidity - but not age - is associated with an increased risk of hospitalisations on either treatment, and with any infection on vedolizumab. This underlines the importance of comorbidity assessment and safety monitoring of IBD patients.
Collapse
|
11
|
Biemans VBC, van der Woude CJ, Dijkstra G, van der Meulen‐de Jong AE, Löwenberg M, de Boer NK, Oldenburg B, Srivastava N, Jansen JM, Bodelier AGL, West RL, de Vries AC, Haans JJL, de Jong D, Hoentjen F, Pierik MJ. Ustekinumab is associated with superior effectiveness outcomes compared to vedolizumab in Crohn's disease patients with prior failure to anti-TNF treatment. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2020; 52:123-134. [PMID: 32441396 PMCID: PMC7318204 DOI: 10.1111/apt.15745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2020] [Revised: 02/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Both vedolizumab and ustekinumab can be considered for the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD) when anti-TNF treatment fails. However, head-to-head trials are currently not available or planned. AIM To compare vedolizumab and ustekinumab in Crohn´s disease patients in a prospective registry specifically developed for comparative studies with correction for confounders. METHODS Crohn´s disease patients, who failed anti-TNF treatment and started vedolizumab or ustekinumab in standard care as second-line biological, were identified in the observational prospective Dutch Initiative on Crohn and Colitis Registry. Corticosteroid-free clinical remission (Harvey Bradshaw Index ≤4), biochemical remission (C-reactive protein ≤5 mg/L and fecal calprotectin ≤250 µg/g), combined corticosteroid-free clinical and biochemical remission, and safety outcomes were compared after 52 weeks of treatment. To adjust for confounding and selection bias, we used multiple logistic regression and propensity score matching. RESULTS In total, 128 vedolizumab- and 85 ustekinumab-treated patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. After adjusting for confounders, ustekinumab-treated patients were more likely to achieve corticosteroid-free clinical remission (odds ratio [OR]: 2.58, 95% CI: 1.36-4.90, P = 0.004), biochemical remission (OR: 2.34, 95% CI: 1.10-4.96, P = 0.027), and combined corticosteroid-free clinical and biochemical remission (OR: 2.74, 95% CI: 1.23-6.09, P = 0.014), while safety outcomes (infections: OR: 1.26, 95% CI: 0.63-2.54, P = 0.517; adverse events: OR: 1.33, 95% CI: 0.62-2.81, P = 0.464; hospitalisations: OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.32-1.39, P = 0.282) were comparable between the two groups. The propensity score matched cohort with sensitivity analyses showed comparable results. CONCLUSIONS Ustekinumab was associated with superior effectiveness outcomes when compared to vedolizumab, while safety outcomes were comparable after 52 weeks of treatment in CD patients who have failed anti-TNF treatment.
Collapse
|
12
|
Biemans VBC, Sleutjes JAM, de Vries AC, Bodelier AGL, Dijkstra G, Oldenburg B, Löwenberg M, van Bodegraven AA, van der Meulen-de Jong AE, de Boer NKH, Srivastava N, West RL, Römkens TEH, Horjus Talabur Horje CS, Jansen JM, van der Woude CJ, Hoekstra J, Weersma RK, van Schaik FDM, Hoentjen F, Pierik MJ. Tofacitinib for ulcerative colitis: results of the prospective Dutch Initiative on Crohn and Colitis (ICC) registry. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2020. [PMID: 32237087 DOI: 10.1111/apt.1568933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tofacitinib is a Janus kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). AIM To evaluate effectiveness, safety and use of tofacitinib in daily practice. METHODS UC patients initiating tofacitinib were prospectively enrolled in 15 hospitals in the Netherlands. Corticosteroid-free clinical remission (short clinical colitis activity index [SCCAI] ≤2), biochemical remission (faecal calprotectin level ≤250 µg/g), combined corticosteroid-free clinical and biochemical remission, predictors of remission, safety outcomes, treatment dose and effect on lipids were determined at weeks 12 and 24. Endoscopic outcomes were evaluated in centres with routine endoscopic evaluation. RESULTS In total, 123 UC patients (95% anti-TNF, 62% vedolizumab and 3% ustekinumab experienced) were followed for a median duration of 24 weeks (interquartile range 12-26). The proportion of patients in corticosteroid-free clinical, biochemical, and combined corticosteroid-free clinical and biochemical remission rate at week 24 was 29% (n: 22/77), 25% (n: 14/57), and 19% (n: 11/57) respectively. Endoscopic remission (Mayo = 0) was achieved in 21% of patients at week 12 (n: 7/33). Prior vedolizumab exposure was associated with reduced clinical remission (odds ratio 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.11-0.94). At week 24, 33% (n: 14/42) of patients still on tofacitinib treatment used 10 mg twice daily. In total, 33 tofacitinib-related adverse events (89 per 100 patient years) occurred, 7 (6% of total cohort) resulted in discontinuation. Cholesterol, HDL and LDL levels increased during induction treatment by 18% (95% CI 9-26), 18% (95% CI 8-28) and 21% (95% CI 14-39) respectively. CONCLUSION Tofacitinib is an effective treatment for UC after anti-TNF and vedolizumab failure. However, a relatively high rate of adverse events was observed resulting in discontinuation in 6% of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vince B C Biemans
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Gerard Dijkstra
- University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Oldenburg
- University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mark Löwenberg
- Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Nanne K H de Boer
- Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam Gastroenterology & Metabolism research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Rachel L West
- Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Rinse K Weersma
- University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Frank Hoentjen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke J Pierik
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Biemans VBC, Sleutjes JAM, de Vries AC, Bodelier AGL, Dijkstra G, Oldenburg B, Löwenberg M, van Bodegraven AA, van der Meulen‐de Jong AE, de Boer NKH, Srivastava N, West RL, Römkens TEH, Horjus Talabur Horje CS, Jansen JM, van der Woude CJ, Hoekstra J, Weersma RK, van Schaik FDM, Hoentjen F, Pierik MJ. Tofacitinib for ulcerative colitis: results of the prospective Dutch Initiative on Crohn and Colitis (ICC) registry. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2020; 51:880-888. [PMID: 32237087 PMCID: PMC7187329 DOI: 10.1111/apt.15689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2019] [Revised: 01/21/2020] [Accepted: 02/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tofacitinib is a Janus kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). AIM To evaluate effectiveness, safety and use of tofacitinib in daily practice. METHODS UC patients initiating tofacitinib were prospectively enrolled in 15 hospitals in the Netherlands. Corticosteroid-free clinical remission (short clinical colitis activity index [SCCAI] ≤2), biochemical remission (faecal calprotectin level ≤250 µg/g), combined corticosteroid-free clinical and biochemical remission, predictors of remission, safety outcomes, treatment dose and effect on lipids were determined at weeks 12 and 24. Endoscopic outcomes were evaluated in centres with routine endoscopic evaluation. RESULTS In total, 123 UC patients (95% anti-TNF, 62% vedolizumab and 3% ustekinumab experienced) were followed for a median duration of 24 weeks (interquartile range 12-26). The proportion of patients in corticosteroid-free clinical, biochemical, and combined corticosteroid-free clinical and biochemical remission rate at week 24 was 29% (n: 22/77), 25% (n: 14/57), and 19% (n: 11/57) respectively. Endoscopic remission (Mayo = 0) was achieved in 21% of patients at week 12 (n: 7/33). Prior vedolizumab exposure was associated with reduced clinical remission (odds ratio 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.11-0.94). At week 24, 33% (n: 14/42) of patients still on tofacitinib treatment used 10 mg twice daily. In total, 33 tofacitinib-related adverse events (89 per 100 patient years) occurred, 7 (6% of total cohort) resulted in discontinuation. Cholesterol, HDL and LDL levels increased during induction treatment by 18% (95% CI 9-26), 18% (95% CI 8-28) and 21% (95% CI 14-39) respectively. CONCLUSION Tofacitinib is an effective treatment for UC after anti-TNF and vedolizumab failure. However, a relatively high rate of adverse events was observed resulting in discontinuation in 6% of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vince B. C. Biemans
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyRadboud University Medical CentreNijmegenThe Netherlands,Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyMaastricht University Medical CentreMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Gerard Dijkstra
- University Medical Centre GroningenUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| | - Bas Oldenburg
- University Medical Centre UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Mark Löwenberg
- Amsterdam University Medical CentreAcademic Medical CentreAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | | | - Nanne K. H. de Boer
- Amsterdam University Medical CentreVrije UniversiteitAmsterdam Gastroenterology & Metabolism research instituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Rinse K. Weersma
- University Medical Centre GroningenUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| | | | - Frank Hoentjen
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyRadboud University Medical CentreNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Marieke J. Pierik
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyMaastricht University Medical CentreMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Biemans VBC, van der Meulen - de Jong AE, van der Woude CJ, Löwenberg M, Dijkstra G, Oldenburg B, de Boer NKH, van der Marel S, Bodelier AGL, Jansen JM, Haans JJL, Theeuwen R, de Jong D, Pierik MJ, Hoentjen F. Ustekinumab for Crohn's Disease: Results of the ICC Registry, a Nationwide Prospective Observational Cohort Study. J Crohns Colitis 2020; 14:33-45. [PMID: 31219157 PMCID: PMC7142409 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Ustekinumab is approved for the treatment of Crohn's disease [CD]. Systematically registered prospective real-world data are scarce. We therefore aimed to study the effectiveness, safety and usage of ustekinumab for CD in everyday practice. METHODS We prospectively enrolled CD patients initiating ustekinumab in regular care between December 2016 and January 2019. Clinical (Harvey Bradshaw Index [HBI]), biochemical (C-reactive protein [CRP] and faecal calprotectin [FCP]), extra-intestinal manifestations and, peri-anal fistula activity, ustekinumab dosage, concomitant medication use, and adverse events were documented at weeks 0, 12, 24, and 52. The primary outcome was corticosteroid-free clinical remission. RESULTS In total, 221 CD patients were included (98.6% anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] and 46.6% vedolizumab exposed) with a median follow-up of 52.0 weeks [interquartile range 49.3-58.4]. Corticosteroid-free clinical remission rates at weeks 24 and 52 were 38.2% and 37.1%, respectively. An initial dosing schedule of 8 weeks, compared to 12 weeks, correlated with a lower discontinuation rate [20.0% vs 42.6%, p = 0.01], but comparable corticosteroid-free clinical remission at week 52 (46.3% [q8w] vs 34.6% [q12w], p = 0.20). There was no clinical benefit of combination therapy after 52 weeks when compared to ustekinumab monotherapy [combi 40.6% vs mono 36.0%, p = 0.64]. At baseline, 28 patients had active peri-anal fistula, of whom 35.7% showed complete clinical resolution after 24 weeks. During follow-up we encountered six severe infections [3.5 per 100 patient-years], with all patients being on concomitant immunosuppressant therapies. Ustekinumab treatment discontinuation was observed in 75 [33.9%] patients mainly due to lack of response. CONCLUSION Ustekinumab is a relatively safe and effective treatment option for CD patients with prior failure of anti-TNF and anti-integrin therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vince B C Biemans
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Mark Löwenberg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerard Dijkstra
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Oldenburg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nanne K H de Boer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Gastroenterology and Metabolism Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sander van der Marel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Haaglanden Medical Centre, the Hague, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jeroen M Jansen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeoffrey J L Haans
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Rosaline Theeuwen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk de Jong
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marie J Pierik
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Hoentjen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands,Corresponding author: Frank Hoentjen, MD, PhD, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, code 455, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Tel: +31 243619190;
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Biemans VBC, van der Woude CJ, Dijkstra G, van der Meulen-de Jong AE, Oldenburg B, de Boer NK, Löwenberg M, Srivastava N, Bodelier AGL, West RL, Jansen JM, de Vries AC, Haans JJL, de Jong DJ, Pierik MJ, Hoentjen F. Vedolizumab for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Two-Year Results of the Initiative on Crohn and Colitis (ICC) Registry, A Nationwide Prospective Observational Cohort Study: ICC Registry - Vedolizumab. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2019; 107:1189-1199. [PMID: 31677154 PMCID: PMC7232860 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.1712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2019] [Accepted: 10/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Prospective data of vedolizumab treatment for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) beyond 1 year of treatment is scarce but needed for clinical decision making. We prospectively enrolled 310 patients with IBD (191 with Crohn's disease (CD) and 119 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC)) with a follow‐up period of 104 weeks (interquartile range: 103–104) in a nationwide registry. The corticosteroid‐free clinical remission rate (Harvey Bradshaw Index ≤ 4, Short Clinical Colitis Activity index ≤ 2) at weeks 52 and 104 were 28% and 19% for CD and 27% and 28% for UC, respectively. Fifty‐nine percent maintained corticosteroid‐free clinical remission between weeks 52 and 104. Vedolizumab with concomitant immunosuppression showed comparable effectiveness outcomes compared with vedolizumab monotherapy (week 104: 21% vs. 23%; P = 0.77), whereas 8 of 13 severe infections occurred in patients treated with concomitant immunosuppression. To conclude, the clinical effect was 19% for CD and 28% for UC after 2 years of follow‐up regardless of concomitant immunosuppression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vince B C Biemans
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - C Janneke van der Woude
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerard Dijkstra
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Bas Oldenburg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nanne K de Boer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Gastroenterology & Metabolism Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mark Löwenberg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nidhi Srivastava
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Haaglanden Medical Centre, the Hague, The Netherlands
| | | | - Rachel L West
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen M Jansen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annemarie C de Vries
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeoffrey J L Haans
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk J de Jong
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marie J Pierik
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Hoentjen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Galazzo G, Tedjo DI, Wintjens DSJ, Savelkoul PHM, Masclee AAM, Bodelier AGL, Pierik MJ, Jonkers DMAE, Penders J. Faecal Microbiota Dynamics and their Relation to Disease Course in Crohn's Disease. J Crohns Colitis 2019; 13:1273-1282. [PMID: 30810207 PMCID: PMC6764104 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Microbial shifts have been associated with disease activity in Crohn's disease [CD], but findings on specific taxa are inconsistent. This may be due to differences in applied methods and cross-sectional study designs. We prospectively examined the faecal microbiota in adult CD patients with changing or stable disease course over time. METHODS Faeces were collected at two time-points from 15 healthy control individuals [HCs], 35 CD patients who were in remission and who maintained remission [RRs], and 22 CD patients during remission and also during subsequent exacerbation [RAs]. The microbial composition was assessed by 16S rRNA [V4] gene sequencing. RESULTS Compared with HCs, patients with CD had a lower microbial richness [p = 0.0002] and diversity [p = 0.005]. Moreover, the microbial community structure of a subset of patients, clustered apart from HCs, was characterized by low microbial diversity and Faecalibacterium abundance. Patients within this cluster did not differ with respect to long-term disease course compared with patients with a 'healthy-appearing' microbiota.Over time, microbial richness and diversity did not change in RR versus RA patients. Although the microbial community structure of both RR and RA patients was less stable over time compared with that of HCs, no differences were observed between the patient groups [p = 0.17]; nor was the stability impacted by Montreal classification, medication use, or surgery. CONCLUSION The altered microbiota composition and stability in CD was neither associated with disease activity nor long-term disease course, questioning its involvement in the development of an exacerbation. The aberrant microbiota composition in a subset of CD patients warrants further exploration of a more microbiota-driven etiology in this group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Galazzo
- School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism [NUTRIM], Department of Medical Microbiology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands,School of Public Health and Primary Care [Caphri], Department of Medical Microbiology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Danyta I Tedjo
- School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism [NUTRIM], Department of Medical Microbiology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands,School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism [NUTRIM], Division Gastroenterology–Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Dion S J Wintjens
- School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism [NUTRIM], Division Gastroenterology–Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands,Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Paul H M Savelkoul
- School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism [NUTRIM], Department of Medical Microbiology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands,School of Public Health and Primary Care [Caphri], Department of Medical Microbiology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands,Department of Medical Microbiology & Infection control, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ad A M Masclee
- School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism [NUTRIM], Division Gastroenterology–Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands,Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marie J Pierik
- School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism [NUTRIM], Division Gastroenterology–Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands,Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Daisy M A E Jonkers
- School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism [NUTRIM], Division Gastroenterology–Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands,Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - John Penders
- School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism [NUTRIM], Department of Medical Microbiology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands,School of Public Health and Primary Care [Caphri], Department of Medical Microbiology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands,Corresponding authors: J. Penders, Department of Medical Microbiology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, PO 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Tel: +31-(0)433875134; Fax: +31-(0)433676643;
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
de Jong MJ, Roosen D, Degens JHRJ, van den Heuvel TRA, Romberg-Camps M, Hameeteman W, Bodelier AGL, Romanko I, Lukas M, Winkens B, Markus T, Masclee AAM, van Tubergen A, Jonkers DMAE, Pierik MJ. Development and Validation of a Patient-reported Score to Screen for Mucosal Inflammation in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J Crohns Colitis 2019; 13:555-563. [PMID: 30476099 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjy196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Patient-reported outcome measures [PROMs] assessing inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] activity are of interest for monitoring in clinical practice, telemedicine systems, or trials. Different PROMs for follow-up of disease activity are available; however, none was developed with endoscopy as gold standard. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a PROM to predict endoscopic disease activity, following the recommendations of the Food and Drug Administration. METHODS During development, 178 IBD patients undergoing a colonoscopy were asked to fill out 13 clinical questions derived from the literature. During endoscopy, inflammation was assessed with the simplified endoscopic score for Crohn's disease [CD] and the Mayo endoscopic subscore for ulcerative colitis [UC]. Based on correlation with endoscopic inflammation, questions were reduced to a total of six for CD and five for UC. The newly developed Monitor IBD At Home questionnaire [MIAH] was validated in an independent cohort of 135 CD and 131 UC patients. Additionally, diagnostic accuracy of the MIAH combined with a calprotectin home test [CHT] was assessed. RESULTS The MIAH-CD includes questions on rectal bleeding, mucus, stool frequency, urgency, fatigue, and patient-reported disease activity. The MIAH-UC contains items on rectal bleeding, stool frequency, urgency, abdominal pain, and patient-reported disease activity. Both questionnaires showed to be valid, reliable, and responsive to changes. The MIAH and CHT combined had a sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value [NPV], and positive predicitive value [PPV] of 96.7%, 66.7%, 94.7%, and 76.3% for CD and of 88.2%, 81.4%, 95.6%, and 60.0% for UC, respectively, compared with endoscopy. CONCLUSIONS The MIAH is the first PROM developed to predict endoscopic inflammation in IBD patients. A combination of this questionnaire and a CHT shows excellent diagnostic accuracy to screen for patients who need further assessment of disease activity, and can be used in daily practice, telemedicine systems, and trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marin J de Jong
- Maastricht University Medical Center+, Department Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Maastricht University Medical Center+, NUTRIM - School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Danielle Roosen
- Maastricht University Medical Center+, Department Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Juliette H R J Degens
- Maastricht University Medical Center+, Department Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Tim R A van den Heuvel
- Maastricht University Medical Center+, Department Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Maastricht University Medical Center+, NUTRIM - School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marielle Romberg-Camps
- Zuyderland Medical Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Geriatrics, Internal and Intensive Care Medicine [Co-MIK], Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands
| | - W Hameeteman
- Maastricht University Medical Center+, Department Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander G L Bodelier
- Amphia Hospital Breda, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Igor Romanko
- Clinical Research Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases IBD Center ISCARE, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Milan Lukas
- Clinical Research Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases IBD Center ISCARE, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Bjorn Winkens
- Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Methodology and Statistics, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Maastricht University Medical Center+, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ad A M Masclee
- Maastricht University Medical Center+, Department Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Maastricht University Medical Center+, NUTRIM - School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Astrid van Tubergen
- Maastricht University Medical Center+, Department of Rheumatology, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Maastricht University Medical Center+, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Daisy M A E Jonkers
- Maastricht University Medical Center+, Department Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Maastricht University Medical Center+, NUTRIM - School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marie J Pierik
- Maastricht University Medical Center+, Department Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Maastricht University Medical Center+, NUTRIM - School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Beek MA, Bodelier AGL, Crolla RMPH. [Gastric perforation in Eastern European economic migrants]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2019; 163:D3518. [PMID: 31050268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
The general prevalence of perforated peptic ulcers is decreasing and they are, therefore, more likely to be missed. In our hospital, Eastern European migrants are overrepresented in the population of patients with perforated gastric peptic ulcers; due to a higher prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in Eastern Europe, they have a higher chance of developing gastric peptic ulcers than patients of Dutch origin. Treatment is hampered by the language barrier and low compliance rates, with patients often leaving hospital against medical advice and not showing up for follow-up appointments. These patients should, therefore, be informed by an interpreter, so that they are well educated about the disease and its treatment. Furthermore, we advise determination of the presence of H. pylori in these patients either during or directly after surgery, and, if necessary, empirical eradication of the bacteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten A Beek
- Amphia ziekenhuis, afd. Chirurgie, Breda
- Contact: M.A. Beek
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Smolinska A, Bodelier AGL, Dallinga JW, Masclee AAM, Jonkers DM, van Schooten FJ, Pierik MJ. The potential of volatile organic compounds for the detection of active disease in patients with ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2017; 45:1244-1254. [PMID: 28239876 DOI: 10.1111/apt.14004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2016] [Revised: 07/26/2016] [Accepted: 02/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To optimise treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC), patients need repeated assessment of mucosal inflammation. Current non-invasive biomarkers and clinical activity indices do not accurately reflect disease activity in all patients and cannot discriminate UC from non-UC colitis. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled air could be predictive of active disease or remission in Crohn's disease. AIM To investigate whether VOCs are able to differentiate between active UC, UC in remission and non-UC colitis. METHODS UC patients participated in a 1-year study. Clinical activity index, blood, faecal and breath samples were collected at each out-patient visit. Patients with clear defined active faecal calprotectin >250 μg/g and inactive disease (Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index <3, C-reactive protein <5 mg/L and faecal calprotectin <100 μg/g) were included for cross-sectional analysis. Non-UC colitis was confirmed by stool culture or radiological evaluation. Breath samples were analysed by gas chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry and kernel-based method to identify discriminating VOCs. RESULTS In total, 72 UC (132 breath samples; 62 active; 70 remission) and 22 non-UC-colitis patients (22 samples) were included. Eleven VOCs predicted active vs. inactive UC in an independent internal validation set with 92% sensitivity and 77% specificity (AUC 0.94). Non-UC colitis patients could be clearly separated from active and inactive UC patients with principal component analysis. CONCLUSIONS Volatile organic compounds can accurately distinguish active disease from remission in UC and profiles in UC are clearly different from profiles in non-UC colitis patients. VOCs have demonstrated potential as new non-invasive biomarker to monitor inflammation in UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Smolinska
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, NUTRIM School for Nutrition, and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - A G L Bodelier
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, NUTRIM School for Nutrition, and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - J W Dallinga
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, NUTRIM School for Nutrition, and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - A A M Masclee
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, NUTRIM School for Nutrition, and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - D M Jonkers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, NUTRIM School for Nutrition, and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - F-J van Schooten
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, NUTRIM School for Nutrition, and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - M J Pierik
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, NUTRIM School for Nutrition, and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
de Bree LCJ, Bodelier AGL, Verburg GP. Fasciola hepatica as a cause of jaundice after chewing khat: a case report. Neth J Med 2013; 71:478-479. [PMID: 24218422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
Fasciola hepatica is a worldwide distributed zoonotic trematode incidentally infecting humans. Although often symptomatic, fascioliasis can cause a wide spectrum of disease. The diagnosis can be established by stool examination detecting ova of the parasite, although serological testing has a higher sensitivity and specificity in the acute phase of disease. This case presents a 24-year-old Somalian man admitted with jaundice and abdominal discomfort due to fascioliasis after chewing khat. The patient was treated successfully with a single dose of triclabendazole.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L C J de Bree
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Geraedts MCP, Troost FJ, De Ridder RJ, Bodelier AGL, Masclee AAM, Saris WHM. Validation of Ussing chamber technology to study satiety hormone release from human duodenal specimens. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2012; 20:678-82. [PMID: 21566565 DOI: 10.1038/oby.2011.104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
By developing novel screening technologies to test effects of food ingredients on hormone release, which are comparable to the in vivo situation, fewer tests may have to be performed using volunteers, whereas it still provides information that can be extrapolated to the human situation. In an in vivo intervention study, 10 lean (BMI: 20-25 kg/m(2)) and 10 obese (BMI >30 kg/m(2)) were recruited. All subjects randomly received pea protein (PP) solutions or placebo, orally and intraduodenally. Cholecystokinin (CCK) and glucagon like peptide 1 (GLP-1) release was measured over 2 h. During the oral interventions, gastrointestinal (GI) fluids were retrieved. For the present ex vivo study, duodenal biopsies were taken and placed in Ussing chambers. The luminal side was exposed to PP, placebo, intraduodenal fluid after oral PP-intake and oral placebo-intake in vivo, and a commercial pea-hydrolysate for 2 h. CCK and GLP-1 levels were measured at the serosal side. After intraduodenal PP administration in vivo, the area under the curve (AUC) for both CCK and GLP-1 was significantly increased in both lean and obese subjects. In the ex vivo study, exposure to PP resulted in significantly elevated levels of CCK and GLP-1 compared to all other test solutions. These results indicate that the ex vivo Ussing chamber technology is a valid alternative for in vivo studies, and may therefore serve as a suitable screening tool for studying the effects of nutritional compounds on the release of satiety hormones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maartje C P Geraedts
- Department of Human Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bodelier AGL, Haak HR. [Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (carcinoid tumours): definition, clinical aspects, diagnosis and therapy]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2006; 150:1868-72. [PMID: 16970007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
Carcinoid tumours are rare neuroendocrine tumours. In 2000 the WHO developed a new classification which gives a better description of the characteristics and biological behaviour of the tumour. Their advised designation is gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumour (GEP-NET). Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy has the highest sensitivity for visualisation of GEP-NETs. In the recent past years new positron emission tomography (PET) tracers have been developed and PET scanning is likely to become an important tool in the near future. Surgical resection is the treatment of first choice for a patient with a GEP-NET. In metastatic disease a number of forms ofpalliative treatment are possible. Cytotoxic chemotherapy seems only to be effective in aggressive, poorly-differentiated tumours. Therapy with somatostatin analogues leads to objective tumour regression in a minority of patients only. New advances in peptide receptor radionuclide therapy using radioactive-labelled somatostatin analoga are showing better results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A G L Bodelier
- Máxima Medisch Centrum, afd Interne Geneeskunde, Eindhoven.
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
We report a case of spinal epidural lipomatosis (SEL) caused by ectopic Cushing's syndrome and give a review of the literature. The most common cause of SEL is prolonged therapy with glucocorticoids, only a very few cases are related to endogenous Cushing's syndrome. The pathophysiological mechanism is not clear but there is a possible role for the autonomic nervous system in the stimulation of growth of epidural fat. Severe neurological symptoms which indicate myelopathy and radiculopathy can occur, but there is often a delay in diagnosis because the non-specific initial symptoms are not recognized. The epidural fat is mostly located in the thoracic and lumbar region. Magnetic resonance imaging can establish the diagnosis rapidly. In patients with severe neurological symptoms, surgical decompression of the myelum and removal of the epidural fat is the treatment of choice. Most patients have partial or complete recovery of neurological deficits after surgical treatment or after discontinuing glucocorticoid therapy; mild cases can also be treated conservatively. Routine imaging for the detection of epidural-located lipomatosis in patients at risk is probably useful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander G L Bodelier
- Department of Internal Medicine and Endocrinology, Máxima Medical Centre, 5600 PD Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|