1
|
van Linschoten RCA, Jansen FM, Pauwels RWM, Smits LJT, Atsma F, Kievit W, de Jong DJ, de Vries AC, Boekema PJ, West RL, Bodelier AGL, Gisbertz IAM, Wolfhagen FHJ, Römkens TEH, Lutgens MWMD, van Bodegraven AA, Oldenburg B, Pierik MJ, Russel MGVM, de Boer NK, Mallant-Hent RC, Ter Borg PCJ, van der Meulen-de Jong AE, Jansen JM, Jansen SV, Tan ACITL, van der Woude CJ, Hoentjen F. A Prediction Model for Successful Increase of Adalimumab Dose Intervals in Patients with Crohn's Disease: Secondary Analysis of the Pragmatic Open-Label Randomised Controlled Non-inferiority LADI Trial. Dig Dis Sci 2024:10.1007/s10620-024-08410-z. [PMID: 38594435 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-024-08410-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the pragmatic open-label randomised controlled non-inferiority LADI trial we showed that increasing adalimumab (ADA) dose intervals was non-inferior to conventional dosing for persistent flares in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) in clinical and biochemical remission. AIMS To develop a prediction model to identify patients who can successfully increase their ADA dose interval based on secondary analysis of trial data. METHODS Patients in the intervention group of the LADI trial increased ADA intervals to 3 and then to 4 weeks. The dose interval increase was defined as successful when patients had no persistent flare (> 8 weeks), no intervention-related severe adverse events, no rescue medication use during the study, and were on an increased dose interval while in clinical and biochemical remission at week 48. Prediction models were based on logistic regression with relaxed LASSO. Models were internally validated using bootstrap optimism correction. RESULTS We included 109 patients, of which 60.6% successfully increased their dose interval. Patients that were active smokers (odds ratio [OR] 0.90), had previous CD-related intra-abdominal surgeries (OR 0.85), proximal small bowel disease (OR 0.92), an increased Harvey-Bradshaw Index (OR 0.99) or increased faecal calprotectin (OR 0.997) were less likely to successfully increase their dose interval. The model had fair discriminative ability (AUC = 0.63) and net benefit analysis showed that the model could be used to select patients who could increase their dose interval. CONCLUSION The final prediction model seems promising to select patients who could successfully increase their ADA dose interval. The model should be validated externally before it may be applied in clinical practice. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03172377.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reinier C A van Linschoten
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fenna M Jansen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Renske W M Pauwels
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lisa J T Smits
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Femke Atsma
- Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Wietske Kievit
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Science, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk J de Jong
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Annemarie C de Vries
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paul J Boekema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maxima Medical Center, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Rachel L West
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ingrid A M Gisbertz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Bernhoven Hospital, Uden, The Netherlands
| | - Frank H J Wolfhagen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa E H Römkens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 'S-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Maurice W M D Lutgens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Elisabeth Twee Steden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Adriaan A van Bodegraven
- Department of Gastroenterology, Geriatrics, Internal and Intensive Care Medicine (Co-MIK), Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen/Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Oldenburg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke J Pierik
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Center +, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maurice G V M Russel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Twente, The Netherlands
| | - Nanne K de Boer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Pieter C J Ter Borg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jeroen M Jansen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sita V Jansen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Adrianus C I T L Tan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CWZ Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Frank Hoentjen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, 2-20A Zeidler Ledcor Centre, 8540-112 Street NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2P8, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van Linschoten RCA, Jansen FM, Pauwels RWM, Smits LJT, Atsma F, Kievit W, de Jong DJ, de Vries AC, Boekema PJ, West RL, Bodelier AGL, Gisbertz IAM, Wolfhagen FHJ, Römkens TEH, Lutgens MWMD, van Bodegraven AA, Oldenburg B, Pierik MJ, Russel MGVM, de Boer NK, Mallant-Hent RC, Ter Borg PCJ, van der Meulen-de Jong AE, Jansen JM, Jansen SV, Tan ACITL, van der Woude CJ, Hoentjen F. Increased versus conventional adalimumab dose interval for patients with Crohn's disease in stable remission (LADI): a pragmatic, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 8:343-355. [PMID: 36736339 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(22)00434-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Revised: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite its effectiveness in treating Crohn's disease, adalimumab is associated with an increased risk of infections and high health-care costs. We aimed to assess clinical outcomes of increased adalimumab dose intervals versus conventional dosing in patients with Crohn's disease in stable remission. METHODS The LADI study was a pragmatic, open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority, parallel, randomised controlled trial, done in six academic hospitals and 14 general hospitals in the Netherlands. Adults (aged ≥18 years) diagnosed with luminal Crohn's disease (with or without concomitant perianal disease) were eligible when in steroid-free clinical and biochemical remission (defined as Harvey-Bradshaw Index [HBI] score <5, faecal calprotectin <150 μg/g, and C-reactive protein <10 mg/L) for at least 9 months on a stable dose of 40 mg subcutaneous adalimumab every 2 weeks. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to the intervention group or control group by the coordinating investigator using a secure web-based system with variable block randomisation (block sizes of 6, 9, and 12). Randomisation was stratified on concomitant use of thiopurines and methotrexate. Patients and health-care providers were not masked to group assignment. Patients allocated to the intervention group increased adalimumab dose intervals to 40 mg every 3 weeks at baseline and further to every 4 weeks if they remained in clinical and biochemical remission at week 24. Patients in the control group continued their 2-weekly dose interval. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of persistent flares at week 48 defined as the presence of at least two of the following criteria: HBI score of 5 or more, C-reactive protein 10 mg/L or more, and faecal calprotectin more than 250 μg/g for more than 8 weeks and a concurrent decrease in the adalimumab dose interval or start of escape medication. The non-inferiority margin was 15% on a risk difference scale. All analyses were done in the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03172377, and is not recruiting. FINDINGS Between May 3, 2017, and July 6, 2020, 174 patients were randomly assigned to the intervention group (n=113) or the control group (n=61). Four patients from the intervention group and one patient from the control group were excluded from the analysis for not meeting inclusion criteria. 85 (50%) of 169 participants were female and 84 (50%) were male. At week 48, the cumulative incidence of persistent flares in the intervention group (three [3%] of 109) was non-inferior compared with the control group (zero; pooled adjusted risk difference 1·86% [90% CI -0·35 to 4·07). Seven serious adverse events occurred, all in the intervention group, of which two (both patients with intestinal obstruction) were possibly related to the intervention. Per 100 person-years, 168·35 total adverse events, 59·99 infection-related adverse events, and 42·57 gastrointestinal adverse events occurred in the intervention group versus 134·67, 75·03, and 5·77 in the control group, respectively. INTERPRETATION The individual benefit of increasing adalimumab dose intervals versus the risk of disease recurrence is a trade-off that should take patient preferences regarding medication and the risk of a flare into account. FUNDING Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reinier C A van Linschoten
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Fenna M Jansen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Renske W M Pauwels
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Lisa J T Smits
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Femke Atsma
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Wietske Kievit
- Radboud institute for Health Science, Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Dirk J de Jong
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Annemarie C de Vries
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Paul J Boekema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maxima Medical Center, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Rachel L West
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Ingrid A M Gisbertz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Bernhoven Hospital, Uden, Netherlands
| | - Frank H J Wolfhagen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands
| | - Tessa E H Römkens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
| | - Maurice W M D Lutgens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Elisabeth Twee Steden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, Netherlands
| | - Adriaan A van Bodegraven
- Department of Gastroenterology, Geriatrics, Internal and Intensive Care Medicine (Co-MIK), Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen/Heerlen, Netherlands
| | - Bas Oldenburg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Marieke J Pierik
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Maurice G V M Russel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Twente, Netherlands
| | - Nanne K de Boer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Pieter C J Ter Borg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Jeroen M Jansen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, OLVG, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sita V Jansen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, Netherlands
| | - Adrianus C I T L Tan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CWZ Hospital, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | | - Frank Hoentjen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Theunissen F, van der Wiel SE, Ter Borg PCJ, Koch AD, Ouwendijk RJT, Slangen RME, Siersema PD, Bruno MJ. Implementation of mandatory ERCP registration in The Netherlands and compliance with European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy performance measures: a multicenter database study. Endoscopy 2022; 54:262-267. [PMID: 34107538 DOI: 10.1055/a-1499-7477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2018, the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and United European Gastroenterology (UEG) published quality performance measures for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Since January 2016, all endoscopists in the Netherlands have been required to register all ERCP procedures in a nationwide quality registry. This study aimed to evaluate the procedural success rates of ERCP after the implementation of mandatory national registration and to compare these with the ESGE quality performance measures. METHODS This study was conducted with data from a multicenter endoscopy database. Data from 2019 and 2020 were analyzed. The primary outcome was ERCP procedural outcome. ESGE performance measures that could be evaluated were the percentage of successful bile duct cannulations in patients with virgin papillary anatomy; successful stent placement for a biliary obstruction located below the liver hilum; and complete removal of bile duct stones (< 10 mm). RESULT In total, 5295 ERCPs performed in 11 centers were included for analysis. The overall procedural success rate was 89.1 %. Successful biliary cannulation in patients with a virgin papilla was 90.3 % in nonacademic and 92.4 % in academic centers. The rates of successful stent placement in patients with a biliary obstruction located below the liver hilum were 97.0 % in nonacademic and 98.2 % in academic centers, and of successful bile duct stone extraction were 97.9 % in both nonacademic and academic centers. CONCLUSIONS The quality of ERCPs performed met five of the six evaluated ESGE performance measures. The 95 % target for successful biliary cannulation in patients with virgin papillary anatomy in academic centers was not met. Mandatory registration provides valuable insight into ERCP performance rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Theunissen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sophia E van der Wiel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter C J Ter Borg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ikazia Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arjun D Koch
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rob J T Ouwendijk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, ADRZ, Goes, The Netherlands
| | - Rob M E Slangen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, HagaZiekenhuis, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marco J Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Theunissen F, Lantinga MA, Borg PCJT, Ouwendijk RJT, Bruno MJ, Siersema PD. The yield of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients below 60 years and without alarm symptoms presenting with dyspepsia. Scand J Gastroenterol 2021; 56:740-746. [PMID: 33877961 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2021.1912168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy is frequently performed in patients with upper abdominal symptoms. Although guidelines recommend withholding an endoscopy in the absence of alarm symptoms, dyspeptic symptoms remain a predominant indication for endoscopy. We aimed to investigate the yield of upper GI endoscopy in patients with low-risk dyspeptic symptoms. METHODS We conducted an analysis in a prospectively maintained endoscopy reporting database. We collected the results of all upper GI endoscopy procedures between 2015 and 2019 that was performed in adult patients aged <60 years with dyspeptic symptoms. Patients with documented alarm symptoms were excluded. We categorized endoscopic findings into major and minor endoscopic findings. RESULTS We identified 26,440 patients with dyspeptic symptoms who underwent upper GI endoscopy. A total of 13,978 patients were considered low-risk and included for analysis (median age 46 years, interquartile range (IQR) [36-53], 62% female). In 11,353 patients (81.2%), no endoscopic abnormalities were detected. Major endoscopic findings were seen in 513 patients (3.7%) and minor endoscopic findings in 2178 patients (15.6%). Endoscopic findings indicative of upper GI cancer were reported in 47 patients (0.3%), including 16 (0.1%) oesophageal, 28 (0.2%) gastric and 5 (0.04%) duodenal lesions. Despite an initial unremarkable endoscopy result, 1015 of 11,353 patients (8.9%) underwent a follow-up endoscopy after a median of 428 days [IQR 158-819]. This did not lead to the additional identification of malignancy. CONCLUSIONS The yield of upper GI endoscopy in low-risk (<60 years, no alarm symptoms) patients with dyspepsia is very limited. This study further supports a restrictive use of upper GI endoscopy in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Theunissen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marten A Lantinga
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter C J Ter Borg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ikazia Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rob J T Ouwendijk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, ADRZ, Goes, The Netherlands
| | - Marco J Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Didden P, Reijm AN, Erler NS, Wolters LMM, Tang TJ, Ter Borg PCJ, Leeuwenburgh I, Bruno MJ, Spaander MCW. Fully vs. partially covered selfexpandable metal stent for palliation of malignant esophageal strictures: a randomized trial (the COPAC study). Endoscopy 2018; 50:961-971. [PMID: 29895072 DOI: 10.1055/a-0620-8135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Covered esophageal self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) are currently used for palliation of malignant dysphagia. The optimal extent of the covering to prevent recurrent obstruction is unknown. Therefore, we aimed to compare fully covered (FC) versus partially covered (PC) SEMSs in patients with incurable malignant esophageal stenosis. METHODS In this multicenter randomized controlled trial, 98 incurable patients with dysphagia caused by a malignant stricture of the esophagus or cardia were randomized 1:1 to an FC-SEMS or PC-SEMS. The primary outcome was recurrent obstruction after endoscopic SEMS placement. Secondary outcomes were technical and clinical success, adverse events, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Patients were followed until 6 months after SEMS placement or to SEMS removal, second SEMS insertion, or death, whichever came first. RESULTS Recurrent obstruction after SEMS placement was similar for both types of stents: 19 % for FC-SEMSs and 22 % for PC-SEMSs (P = 0.65). The times to recurrent obstruction did not differ. The frequency of adverse events was similar between the two groups, with major adverse events occurring in 38 % and 47 % of patients for FC-SEMSs and PC-SEMSs, respectively (P = 0.34). No significant differences were seen in technical success, improvement of dysphagia, and HRQoL. Proximal esophageal stenosis and female sex were independently associated with recurrent obstruction and/or major adverse events. CONCLUSIONS Esophageal FC-SEMSs did not reveal a lower recurrent obstruction rate compared with PC-SEMSs in the palliative management of malignant dysphagia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Didden
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Agnes N Reijm
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole S Erler
- Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leonieke M M Wolters
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Thjon J Tang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den Ijssel, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter C J Ter Borg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ivonne Leeuwenburgh
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fransiscus Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marco J Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Manon C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ekkelenkamp VE, de Man RA, Ter Borg F, Borg PCJT, Bruno MJ, Groenen MJM, Hansen BE, van Tilburg AJP, Rauws EAJ, Koch AD. Prospective evaluation of ERCP performance: results of a nationwide quality registry. Endoscopy 2015; 47:503-7. [PMID: 25590180 DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1391231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS Despite significant interest from health care authorities, patient organizations, and insurance companies, data on procedural outcome and quality of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in general and academic practice are sparse. The aims of this study were to assess procedural outcome of ERCP within a large prospective registry in The Netherlands, and to evaluate associations between endoscopist-related factors and procedural outcome. METHODS All endoscopists performing ERCP in The Netherlands were invited to register their ERCPs over a 1-year period using the Rotterdam Assessment Form for ERCP (RAF-E). The primary outcome measure was procedural success. A priori difficulty level of the procedure was classified according to Schutz. Baseline characteristics of the endoscopist (e. g. previous experience) were recorded at study entry. Regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of procedural outcome. RESULTS A total of 8575 ERCPs were registered by 171 endoscopists from 61 centers, constituting about 50 % of all ERCPs performed nationally during the study period. Overall procedural success was 85.8 %. Intact papillary anatomy was present in 5106 patients (59.5 %): procedural success in this subgroup of patients was 83.4 % vs. 89.4 % after sphincterotomy (P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression identified "degree of difficulty," "intact papillary anatomy," and "previous ERCP failure" to be independently associated with procedural failure. "Yearly volume of ERCPs" and "trainee involvement" were independently associated with success. CONCLUSIONS The nationwide prospective RAF-E registry proved to be a valuable tool to gain insight into procedural outcome of ERCPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivian E Ekkelenkamp
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert A de Man
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Ter Borg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter C J Ter Borg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marco J Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel J M Groenen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Bettina E Hansen
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Antonie J P van Tilburg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Franciscus Gasthuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erik A J Rauws
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arjun D Koch
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|