1
|
Liu DTF, Misra R, Moore T. Palliative Radiotherapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Patterns of Use and Predictors of 30-Day Mortality in End-of-Life Care. Cureus 2024; 16:e65238. [PMID: 39184714 PMCID: PMC11343330 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.65238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/24/2024] [Indexed: 08/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) being the most common type. More than half of patients require radiotherapy throughout their treatment. Palliative radiotherapy (PRT) is an important tool for symptom control and quality of life improvement in advanced NSCLC patients. However, the benefits of PRT must be balanced against possible disadvantages, especially in end-of-life (EOL) care. This study aims to describe the profile of PRT-treated deceased NSCLC patients, quantify the proportion of PRT recipients in the last 30 days of life and identify short-term survival prognostic factors in this group. Materials and methods This retrospective analysis was performed at two radiotherapy facilities within the Kent Oncology Centre, UK, for two years, running from January 1, 2022, to January 1, 2024. Data were collected from 857 deceased NSCLC patients who received PRT. Demographics, cancer diagnosis, histology, tumour, node, metastasis (TNM) staging, radiotherapy details, recent treatments, performance status (PS) and comorbidities were analysed. Patients have been stratified as long-term survivors (more than 30 days after PRT initiation, LTS group) along with short-term survivors (STS) (died within 30 days, STS group). Descriptive statistics, chi-squared tests, t-tests and multivariable logistic regression have been used in the data analysis. Results Out of 857 patients, 148 (17.3%) died within 30 days of PRT initiation. PS was considerably worse (p = 0.027), Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27 (ACE-27) scores were higher (p = 0.018), and metastatic disease was more prevalent (60.1% vs. 47.5%, p = 0.02) in STS group patients. Fewer patients in the STS group completed their treatment compared to the LTS group (63.5% vs. 82.8%, p < 0.001). The STS group also received lower mean radiation dose (17.7 Gy vs. 19.6 Gy, p = 0.022) and fewer fractions (4.4 vs. 5.2, p = 0.019). The most common RT regimen in both cohorts was 20 Gy in five fractions, used in 55.4% of STS and 49.8% of LTS patients, with no significant difference in single fraction RT use between groups (33.1% in STS vs. 36.8% in LTS, p = 0.401). Multivariate logistic regression identified significant predictors of 30-day mortality: poorer PS (adjusted OR: 1.981, 95% CI: 1.33-3.12, p = 0.001), metastatic disease (adjusted OR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.246-3.571, p = 0.002), incomplete PRT (adjusted OR: 0.337, 95% CI: 0.21-0.514, p < 0.001) and no recent chemotherapy (adjusted OR: 0.542, 95% CI: 0.342-0.941, p = 0.044). Conclusion This study demonstrated that compared with previous reports, a higher proportion of NSCLC patients who received PRT died within 30 days of treatment initiation, and low treatment adherence rates highlight challenges in EOL settings. Identification of poor PS and metastatic disease as predictors of short-term mortality would help inform PRT decision-making. The underutilisation of single-fraction radiotherapy and the link between recent chemotherapy and lower 30-day mortality warrant further study. These results highlight the need for better prognostic tools and more selective use of PRT, including increased consideration of single-fraction radiotherapy, in NSCLC patients approaching end of life and emphasise the importance of balancing benefit against treatment burden in this vulnerable population.
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhao J, Liu H, Qi T, Zhao H, Ye T, Ning P. Efficacy and safety analysis of stereotactic body radiotherapy for brain multi-metastases in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Technol Health Care 2024; 32:293-301. [PMID: 37393454 DOI: 10.3233/thc-230104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lung cancer is prone to metastasize to the brain, which is difficult for surgery and leads to poor prognosis due to poor chemotherapy efficacy. OBJECTIVE Our aim is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for brain multi-metastases. METHODS In the retrospective study, a total of 51 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain multi-metastases (3-5 metastases) receiving SBRT in the local hospital between 2016 and 2019 were enrolled for analyzing the efficacy and safety of SBRT. The primary endpoints included 1-year local control rate, radiotherapy toxicity, overall survival and progression-free survival. RESULTS The median follow-up for the enrolled patients was 21 months, and the 1-year and 2-year OS rates were 82.4% and 45.1%, respectively. Demographic analysis showed no significant differences between SBRT alone and combination with whole brain radiotherapy in clinical characteristics including age, gender and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. The 1-year local control rate was 77.3% (17/22) for SBRT alone, which was comparable to 79.3% (23/29) of combined radiotherapy. Cox proportional hazard regression demonstrated that the prognostic benefit of combining WBRT was not significantly superior to SBRT alone (HR = 0.851, P= 0.263). Their radiotherapy toxicity rate was lower in SBRT alone group (13.6%, vs. 44.8% for combination; P= 0.017). CONCLUSION The current research suggested that SBRT alone could effectively relieve tumor burden and improve the prognosis and quality of life for NSCLC patients with brain multi-metastases, which should be validated in further prospective clinical trials.
Collapse
|
3
|
Hussain Z. The Holistic Approach to Cancer Pain Management. THE ULSTER MEDICAL JOURNAL 2022; 91:45-49. [PMID: 35169339 PMCID: PMC8835427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
James Alexander Logan, a second-year medical student at the Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, died in February 2001 after a distressing illness of three months duration. His family, friends and interested professionals subsequently set up the James Logan Trust to encourage doctors and others to have the confidence to recognise and treat cancer pain. The James Logan Trust has provided funds for an annual prize for the best essay on "The challenges of cancer pain assessment and management" to be submitted by a Queen's University of Belfast undergraduate medical student after the completion of their fourth-year palliative medicine teaching.
Collapse
|
4
|
Quiñones-Avila V, Ortiz-Ortiz KJ, Ríos-Motta R, Marín-Centeno H, Tortolero-Luna G. Use of palliative radiotherapy among patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer in Puerto Rico. BMC Palliat Care 2021; 20:127. [PMID: 34389004 PMCID: PMC8364074 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-021-00819-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Palliative radiotherapy (RT) represents an important treatment opportunity for improving the quality of life in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients through the management of symptoms within the course of the illness. The aim of the study is to determine the proportion of patients who had palliative RT within 12 months of diagnosis and evaluate the factors associated with it. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was performed using secondary data analysis from 2009 to 2015 from the Puerto Rico Central Cancer Registry-Health Insurance Linkage Database (PRCCR-HILD). A logistic regression model was used to examine factors associated with palliative RT. RESULTS Among the 929 patients identified with metastatic NSCLC, 33.80% received palliative RT within the first year after diagnosis. After adjusting for other covariates, receipt of chemotherapy (ORAdj = 3.90; 95% CI = 2.91-5.45; P < 0.001) and presence of symptoms (ORAdj = 1.41; 95% CI =1.00-1.98; P = 0.045) were associated with increased odds of palliative RT use. Although marginally significant, patients with private health insurance had increased odds of palliative RT use (ORAdj = 1.50; 95% CI = 0.98-2.29; P = 0.061) when compared to beneficiaries of Medicaid, after adjusting by other covariates. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study reveal concerning underuse of palliative RT among patients with metastatic NSCLC in Puerto Rico. Additional research is necessary to further understand the barriers to using palliative RT on the island.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerie Quiñones-Avila
- Department of Health Services Administration, Graduate School of Public Health, Medical Sciences Campus, University of Puerto Rico, P.O. Box 363027, San Juan, 00936-3027, Puerto Rico
| | - Karen J Ortiz-Ortiz
- Department of Health Services Administration, Graduate School of Public Health, Medical Sciences Campus, University of Puerto Rico, P.O. Box 363027, San Juan, 00936-3027, Puerto Rico. .,Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, University of Puerto Rico Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Juan, Puerto Rico. .,Puerto Rico Central Cancer Registry, University of Puerto Rico, Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
| | - Ruth Ríos-Motta
- Department of Health Services Administration, Graduate School of Public Health, Medical Sciences Campus, University of Puerto Rico, P.O. Box 363027, San Juan, 00936-3027, Puerto Rico
| | - Heriberto Marín-Centeno
- Department of Health Services Administration, Graduate School of Public Health, Medical Sciences Campus, University of Puerto Rico, P.O. Box 363027, San Juan, 00936-3027, Puerto Rico
| | - Guillermo Tortolero-Luna
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, University of Puerto Rico Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Juan, Puerto Rico.,Puerto Rico Central Cancer Registry, University of Puerto Rico, Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mushonga M, Nyakabau AM, Ndlovu N, Iyer HS, Bellon JR, Kanda C, Ndarukwa-Jambwa S, Chipidza F, Makunike-Mutasa R, Muchuweti D, Muguti EG, Cluff Elmore SN. Patterns of Palliative Radiotherapy Utilization for Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer in Harare, Zimbabwe. JCO Glob Oncol 2021; 7:1212-1219. [PMID: 34343013 PMCID: PMC8457791 DOI: 10.1200/go.20.00656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In sub-Saharan Africa, radiotherapy (RT) utilization and delivery patterns have not been extensively studied in patients with metastatic breast cancer. METHODS A retrospective cohort study of female patients with metastatic breast cancer seen at Parirenyatwa Radiotherapy Centre in Zimbabwe from 2014 to 2018 was conducted. Demographics, pathology, staging, and treatment data were abstracted through chart review. Fisher's exact test and chi-squared test of independence were used to compare proportions, and independent two-sample t-tests were used to compare means. RESULTS Of 351 patients with breast cancer, 152 (43%) had metastatic disease, median age 51 years (interquartile range: 43-61 years). Of those with metastatic disease, 30 patients (20%) received radiation to various metastatic sites: 16 spine; three nonspine bone metastases; six whole brain; and five chest wall or supraclavicular. Patients who received radiation were younger (46 v 52 years; P = .019), but did not differ significantly by performance status than those who did not. The most common dose prescription was 30 Gy in 10 fractions (33%). Five (17%) patients had treatment interruption and two (7%) had treatment noncompletion. Province of origin and clinical tumor stage were significant predictors of RT receipt (P = .002; and P = .018, respectively). CONCLUSION A minority of patients with metastatic breast cancer received RT (20%), and these were likely to be younger, with advanced tumor stage, and resided in provinces where RT is available. Conventional courses were generally prescribed. There is a need to strongly consider palliative RT as an option for patients with metastatic breast cancer and use of hypofractionated courses (e.g. 8 Gy in one fraction) may support this goal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anna Mary Nyakabau
- Parirenyatwa Hospital Radiotherapy Centre, Harare, Zimbabwe.,Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.,Cancerserve Trust, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Ntokozo Ndlovu
- Parirenyatwa Hospital Radiotherapy Centre, Harare, Zimbabwe.,Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Hari Subramaniam Iyer
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.,Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | - Caroline Kanda
- Parirenyatwa Hospital Radiotherapy Centre, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Sandra Ndarukwa-Jambwa
- Sally Mugabe Central Hospital, Harare, Zimbabwe.,Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Fallon Chipidza
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.,Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Boston, MA
| | - Rudo Makunike-Mutasa
- Department of Pathology, University of Zimbabwe, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - David Muchuweti
- Department of Surgery, University of Zimbabwe, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Edwin G Muguti
- Department of Surgery, University of Zimbabwe, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
McClelland Iii S, Agrawal N, Elbanna MF, Shiue K, Bartlett GK, Lautenschlaeger T, Zellars RC, Watson GA, Ellsworth SG. Baseline Karnofsky performance status is independently predictive of death within 30 days of intracranial radiation therapy completion for metastatic disease. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2020; 25:698-700. [PMID: 32684855 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2019] [Revised: 12/03/2019] [Accepted: 02/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction For patients with brain metastases, palliative radiation therapy (RT) has long been a standard of care for improving quality of life and optimizing intracranial disease control. The duration of time between completion of palliative RT and patient death has rarely been evaluated. Methods A compilation of two prospective institutional databases encompassing April 2015 through December 2018 was used to identify patients who received palliative intracranial radiation therapy. A multivariate logistic regression model characterized patients adjusting for age, sex, admission status (inpatient versus outpatient), Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), and radiation therapy indication. Results 136 consecutive patients received intracranial palliative radiation therapy. Patients with baseline KPS <70 (OR = 2.2; 95%CI = 1.6-3.1; p < 0.0001) were significantly more likely to die within 30 days of treatment. Intracranial palliative radiation therapy was most commonly delivered to provide local control (66% of patients) or alleviate neurologic symptoms (32% of patients), and was most commonly delivered via whole brain radiation therapy in 10 fractions to 30 Gy (38% of patients). Of the 42 patients who died within 30 days of RT, 31 (74%) received at least 10 fractions. Conclusions Our findings indicate that baseline KPS <70 is independently predictive of death within 30 days of palliative intracranial RT, and that a large majority of patients who died within 30 days received at least 10 fractions. These results indicate that for poor performance status patients requiring palliative intracranial radiation, hypofractionated RT courses should be strongly considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shearwood McClelland Iii
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Namita Agrawal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - May F Elbanna
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Kevin Shiue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Gregory K Bartlett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Tim Lautenschlaeger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Richard C Zellars
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Gordon A Watson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Susannah G Ellsworth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rubinstein AE, Ingram WS, Anderson BM, Gay SS, Fave XJ, Ger RB, McCarroll RE, Owens CA, Netherton TJ, Kisling KD, Court LE, Yang J, Li Y, Lee J, Mackin DS, Cardenas CE. Cost-effective immobilization for whole brain radiation therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2017; 18:116-122. [PMID: 28585732 PMCID: PMC5874864 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2017] [Revised: 02/24/2017] [Accepted: 04/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
To investigate the inter‐ and intra‐fraction motion associated with the use of a low‐cost tape immobilization technique as an alternative to thermoplastic immobilization masks for whole‐brain treatments. The results of this study may be of interest to clinical staff with severely limited resources (e.g., in low‐income countries) and also when treating patients who cannot tolerate standard immobilization masks. Setup reproducibility of eight healthy volunteers was assessed for two different immobilization techniques. (a) One strip of tape was placed across the volunteer's forehead and attached to the sides of the treatment table. (b) A second strip was added to the first, under the chin, and secured to the table above the volunteer's head. After initial positioning, anterior and lateral photographs were acquired. Volunteers were positioned five times with each technique to allow calculation of inter‐fraction reproducibility measurements. To estimate intra‐fraction reproducibility, 5‐minute anterior and lateral videos were taken for each technique per volunteer. An in‐house software was used to analyze the photos and videos to assess setup reproducibility. The maximum intra‐fraction displacement for all volunteers was 2.8 mm. Intra‐fraction motion increased with time on table. The maximum inter‐fraction range of positions for all volunteers was 5.4 mm. The magnitude of inter‐fraction and intra‐fraction motion found using the “1‐strip” and “2‐strip” tape immobilization techniques was comparable to motion restrictions provided by a thermoplastic mask for whole‐brain radiotherapy. The results suggest that tape‐based immobilization techniques represent an economical and useful alternative to the thermoplastic mask.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley E Rubinstein
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - W Scott Ingram
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Brian M Anderson
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Skylar S Gay
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xenia J Fave
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rachel B Ger
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rachel E McCarroll
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Constance A Owens
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Tucker J Netherton
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kelly D Kisling
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Laurence E Court
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jinzhong Yang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yuting Li
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Joonsang Lee
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Dennis S Mackin
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Carlos E Cardenas
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Barnes M, Tiwana MS, Kiraly A, Hutchison M, Olson RA. Incidence of distal bone metastases in patients treated for palliative radiotherapy and associations with primary tumour types. J Bone Oncol 2015; 4:107-9. [PMID: 26730358 PMCID: PMC4678776 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbo.2015.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2015] [Revised: 10/04/2015] [Accepted: 10/16/2015] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study assesses the incidence of distal bone metastases in palliative radiotherapy (RT) patients. Material and methods All courses of RT for bone metastases from 2007–2011 for patient living in British Columbia (BC) were identified in a provincial RT programme. Treated bone metastases (BoM) were categorized as distal if the BoM was located within or distal to the elbow or knee. Patients were grouped by primary tumour site as breast, lung, prostate gastrointestinal, haematological, melanoma, and other. The incidence of distal bone metastases and associations with primary tumour types were determined. Results From 2007 to 2011, 8008 patients were treated with 16,277 courses of RT, of which 425 (3%) were courses of RT for distal BoM. The incidence of distal BoM in decreasing order by primary tumour type was melanoma (5%), haematological (3%), lung (2%), other (2%), prostate (2%), breast (1%) and gastrointestinal (1%). Distal BoM where more commonly identified in the lower extremity (87%, p<0.001). Single fraction RT was used more commonly for distal vs non-distal BoM (66% vs. 49%; p<0.001). Conclusion The incidence of distal BoM among patients treated with palliative RT was 3% and most commonly identified in patients with melanoma and haematological malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Barnes
- BC Cancer Agency-Centre for the North, 1215 Lethbridge Street, Prince George, BC, Canada V2M7E9
| | - Manpreet S Tiwana
- BC Cancer Agency-Centre for the North, 1215 Lethbridge Street, Prince George, BC, Canada V2M7E9; University of Northern BC 333 University way, Prince George, BC, Canada V2N4Z9
| | - Andrew Kiraly
- University of Northern BC 333 University way, Prince George, BC, Canada V2N4Z9
| | - Mitch Hutchison
- BC Cancer Agency-Centre for the North, 1215 Lethbridge Street, Prince George, BC, Canada V2M7E9
| | - Robert A Olson
- BC Cancer Agency-Centre for the North, 1215 Lethbridge Street, Prince George, BC, Canada V2M7E9; University of Northern BC 333 University way, Prince George, BC, Canada V2N4Z9; University of British Columbia Radiation Oncologist, BC Cancer Agency-Centre for the North, 1215 Lethbridge Street, Prince George, BC, Canada V2M7E9
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Clinical efficacy of denosumab versus bisphosphonates for the prevention of bone complications: implications for nursing. Support Care Cancer 2015; 23:3625-32. [PMID: 26298333 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-015-2887-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2015] [Accepted: 08/02/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Antiresorptive therapies are used for the prevention of skeletal-related events (SREs) associated with metastatic bone disease related to breast cancer, prostate cancer, and other solid tumors. This review highlights the central role of nurses in supporting and educating advanced cancer patients regarding the consequences of bone metastases and SREs, including therapy management options. Contemporary clinical journals reporting evidence-based studies were reviewed. SREs associated with bone metastases can significantly impact the quality of life of advanced cancer patients. Denosumab therapy, an advancement in antiresorptive treatments, significantly prevents and delays the time to develop SREs. In the multifaceted approach required for successful and consistent management of SREs associated with bone metastases, antiresorptive therapies can play a central role in maintaining the functional independence of patients through the prevention of debilitating SREs, thereby preserving quality of life.
Collapse
|
10
|
Gutt R, Dawson G, Cheuk AV, Fosmire H, Moghanaki D, Kelly M, Jolly S. Palliative Radiotherapy for the Management of Metastatic Cancer: Bone Metastases, Spinal Cord Compression, and Brain Metastases. Fed Pract 2015; 32:12S-16S. [PMID: 30766118 PMCID: PMC6375451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Life expectancy and tumor characteristics should be considered when making treatment recommendations for palliative radiotherapy, which can be cost-effective and provide symptom relief.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruchika Gutt
- is a radiation oncologist at the Washington DC VAMC. and are radiation oncologists at the James J. Peters VAMC in the Bronx, New York, and assistant professors at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York. and Dr. Dawson are radiation oncologists at the New Jersey VAHCS in East Orange, New Jersey. is a radiation oncologist at the Richard L. Roudebush VAMC in Indianapolis, Indiana. is a radiation oncologist at the Hunter Holmes McGuire VAMC and an assistant professor at Virginia Commonwealth University Massey Cancer Center, both in Richmond, Virginia. is a radiation oncologist at the VA Ann Arbor HCS in and an associate professor at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - George Dawson
- is a radiation oncologist at the Washington DC VAMC. and are radiation oncologists at the James J. Peters VAMC in the Bronx, New York, and assistant professors at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York. and Dr. Dawson are radiation oncologists at the New Jersey VAHCS in East Orange, New Jersey. is a radiation oncologist at the Richard L. Roudebush VAMC in Indianapolis, Indiana. is a radiation oncologist at the Hunter Holmes McGuire VAMC and an assistant professor at Virginia Commonwealth University Massey Cancer Center, both in Richmond, Virginia. is a radiation oncologist at the VA Ann Arbor HCS in and an associate professor at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Alice V Cheuk
- is a radiation oncologist at the Washington DC VAMC. and are radiation oncologists at the James J. Peters VAMC in the Bronx, New York, and assistant professors at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York. and Dr. Dawson are radiation oncologists at the New Jersey VAHCS in East Orange, New Jersey. is a radiation oncologist at the Richard L. Roudebush VAMC in Indianapolis, Indiana. is a radiation oncologist at the Hunter Holmes McGuire VAMC and an assistant professor at Virginia Commonwealth University Massey Cancer Center, both in Richmond, Virginia. is a radiation oncologist at the VA Ann Arbor HCS in and an associate professor at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Helen Fosmire
- is a radiation oncologist at the Washington DC VAMC. and are radiation oncologists at the James J. Peters VAMC in the Bronx, New York, and assistant professors at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York. and Dr. Dawson are radiation oncologists at the New Jersey VAHCS in East Orange, New Jersey. is a radiation oncologist at the Richard L. Roudebush VAMC in Indianapolis, Indiana. is a radiation oncologist at the Hunter Holmes McGuire VAMC and an assistant professor at Virginia Commonwealth University Massey Cancer Center, both in Richmond, Virginia. is a radiation oncologist at the VA Ann Arbor HCS in and an associate professor at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Drew Moghanaki
- is a radiation oncologist at the Washington DC VAMC. and are radiation oncologists at the James J. Peters VAMC in the Bronx, New York, and assistant professors at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York. and Dr. Dawson are radiation oncologists at the New Jersey VAHCS in East Orange, New Jersey. is a radiation oncologist at the Richard L. Roudebush VAMC in Indianapolis, Indiana. is a radiation oncologist at the Hunter Holmes McGuire VAMC and an assistant professor at Virginia Commonwealth University Massey Cancer Center, both in Richmond, Virginia. is a radiation oncologist at the VA Ann Arbor HCS in and an associate professor at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Maria Kelly
- is a radiation oncologist at the Washington DC VAMC. and are radiation oncologists at the James J. Peters VAMC in the Bronx, New York, and assistant professors at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York. and Dr. Dawson are radiation oncologists at the New Jersey VAHCS in East Orange, New Jersey. is a radiation oncologist at the Richard L. Roudebush VAMC in Indianapolis, Indiana. is a radiation oncologist at the Hunter Holmes McGuire VAMC and an assistant professor at Virginia Commonwealth University Massey Cancer Center, both in Richmond, Virginia. is a radiation oncologist at the VA Ann Arbor HCS in and an associate professor at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Shruti Jolly
- is a radiation oncologist at the Washington DC VAMC. and are radiation oncologists at the James J. Peters VAMC in the Bronx, New York, and assistant professors at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York. and Dr. Dawson are radiation oncologists at the New Jersey VAHCS in East Orange, New Jersey. is a radiation oncologist at the Richard L. Roudebush VAMC in Indianapolis, Indiana. is a radiation oncologist at the Hunter Holmes McGuire VAMC and an assistant professor at Virginia Commonwealth University Massey Cancer Center, both in Richmond, Virginia. is a radiation oncologist at the VA Ann Arbor HCS in and an associate professor at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
The cost-effectiveness of external beam radiation therapy in bone metastases. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2014; 7:278-83. [PMID: 23912387 DOI: 10.1097/spc.0b013e328362e8e3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Bone is the third common organ affected by metastases, and about 70% of patients with breast cancer or prostate cancer will develop bone metastases. External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is a mainstay of treatment for patients with bone metastases. However, the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of EBRT in patients with bone metastases have not been adequately understood. The current work aims at reviewing recent cost-effectiveness literature of EBRT on patients with bone metastases. RECENT FINDINGS Studies have consistently shown that EBRT is associated with significant pain relief, and existing cost-effectiveness studies have suggested that single fraction radiation therapy is more cost effective than multiple fraction radiation therapy in pain palliation. However, due to the high dependence of the data among these studies and the absence of significant amount of information, the current findings may require supports from further research in validating the results. SUMMARY This work sheds the light on future economic models in applying individual preference to survey questionnaires, such as, contingent valuation/conjoint choice, to carefully measure utility improvements from a treatment. In addition, research with focus on patient-centered outcome is encouraged to help clinician better understand patients' perceived outcomes of EBRT.
Collapse
|
12
|
Thavarajah N, Wong K, Zhang L, Bedard G, Wong E, Tsao M, Danjoux C, Barnes E, Sahgal A, Dennis K, Holden L, Lauzon N, Chow E. Continued success in providing timely palliative radiation therapy at the Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program: a review of 2008-2012. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2013; 20:e206-11. [PMID: 23737690 DOI: 10.3747/co.20.1342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We set out to review the Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program (rrrp). METHODS We retrospectively reviewed a prospective database of patients referred to the rrrp between August 1, 2008, and June 30, 2012, extracting patient demographics, case dispositions, and wait times in days from referral to consultation and from consultation to treatment. RESULTS Of 2742 patients referred to the rrrp, 1458 (53%) were men, and 1284 (47%) were women. Median age was 64 years. The most prevalent primary cancer sites were lung (33%), breast (21%), and prostate (17%). The most common reasons for referral were bone metastases (53%) and brain metastases (21%). Palliative radiation therapy was given to 1890 patients. The median wait time from referral to consultation was 3 days. Among treated patients, 60% were treated on the day of their consultation, and 33%, within 1-6 days. CONCLUSIONS The rrrp continues to deliver timely palliative radiation therapy to patients, comparable to earlier reviews. The continued success of the rrrp will remain a model for future rapid-access palliative radiation therapy clinics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Thavarajah
- Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cai B, Nickman NA, Gaffney DK. The role of palliative external beam radiation therapy in boney metastases pain management. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother 2013; 27:28-34. [PMID: 23394451 DOI: 10.3109/15360288.2012.757267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Bone is the third most common organ affected by neoplastic metastases, and about 70% of patients with breast cancer or prostate cancer that develop metastases will have osseous involvement. As part of a multi-pronged approach to pain management in these patients, external beam radio therapy (EBRT) continues to be a mainstay of treatment for metastatic bone pain. This article reviews the role of radiation therapy in palliative management strategies for patients with bone metastases, including the clinical and cost-effectiveness of single fraction (SFRT) versus multiple fraction (MFRT) EBRT in pain relief. Studies indicate that SFRT is more cost-effective than MFRT, yet both are clinically effective in pain management. Therefore, EBRT use retains an important place among analgesia, bone modifying agents, chemotherapy, and hormone therapy in improving quality of life (QoL) and reducing morbidity from metastatic bone pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beilei Cai
- Pharmacotherapy Outcomes Research Center, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112-0258, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Villarreal-Garza C, de la Mata D, Zavala DG, Macedo-Perez EO, Arrieta O. Aggressive Treatment of Primary Tumor in Patients With Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Exclusively Brain Metastases. Clin Lung Cancer 2013; 14:6-13. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2012.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2012] [Revised: 04/26/2012] [Accepted: 05/01/2012] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|