Contrast Enhanced CT Radiogenomics in a Retrospective NSCLC Cohort: Models, Attempted Validation of a Published Model and the Relevance of the Clinical Context

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE

To develop a radiogenomic predictive model for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients studied through contrast enhanced chest computed tomography (CE-CT) targeting the most frequent gene alterations. M&M: A retrospective study of patients with NSCLC imaged with CE-CT before treatment and had their tumor genomics sequenced at our institution was performed. Data was gathered from their imaging studies, their electronic medical records and a web-based database search (cBioPortal.ca). All of the patient data was tabulated for analysis. Two predictive models (M1 & M2) were created using different approaches and a third model was extracted from the literature to also be tested in our population.

RESULTS

Out of 157 patients, eighty were male (51%) and 124 (79%) had a history of smoking. The three most prevalent genes were KRAS, TP53 and EGFR. The M1 radiomics-only model median AUC were 0.61 (TP53), 0.53 (KRAS) and 0.64 (EGFR) and for M1 radiomics + clinical were 0.61 (TP53), 0.61 (KRAS) and 0.80 (EGFR). The M2 radiomics-only model median AUC were 0.63 (TP53), 0.60 (KRAS) and 0.65 (EGFR) and for M2 radiomics + clinical were 0.64 (TP53), 0.62 (KRAS) and 0.81 (EGFR). The external EGFR radiomic model showed an AUC of 0.69 and 0.86 for the radiomics-only and combined radiomics + clinical respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our study was able to provide robust predictive radiomics model evaluation for the detection of TP53, KRAS and EGFR. We also compared our performance with an already published model and observed how impactful clinical variables can be on models' performance.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Identifying tumor mutations in patients that can't undergo biopsy is critical for their outcomes.

KEYPOINTS

• Tumor genomic profiling is critical for treatment selection • CE-CT radiomics produce robust predictive models comparable to those already published • Clinical variables should be considered/included in predictive models.

Management and Outcomes of Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients Who Achieve Partial Metabolic Response on PET Scans Post-Chemotherapy

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Optimal management of patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) who do not achieve PET (positron emission tomography) complete metabolic response after primary systemic therapy is unclear. Options vary significantly and include radiation therapy (RT) to localized sites of PET avid disease, salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT), or observation with serial imaging. This multi-center study sought to investigate the management approaches and outcomes for HL patients who achieved partial metabolic response after primary systemic therapy.

MATERIALS/METHODS

In this retrospective study, patients diagnosed with HL were identified from the electronic medical records database of two large academic centers between January 2009 and September 2021. PET scan results following initial chemotherapy were reviewed and responses were categorized using International Working Group (IWG) criteria, with the initial staging imaging being used as the reference against which response was evaluated. We performed descriptive analysis of demographic and clinical characteristics of the population and Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to determine progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

The charts of 1,093 HL patients were reviewed. A total of 765 patients had a post chemotherapy PET scan with 57 of those showing partial metabolic response. Among these 57 patients, 31 (54%) were male, the median age at diagnosis was 31 (range:18-74), and the median length of follow up was 1.6 years (average 2.9 years). Five percent stage I, 32% stage II, 23% stage III, and 40% stage IV. Typical initial chemotherapy included ABVD, ABVD switched to BEACOPP due to abnormal interim PET, and AVD with Brentuximab. Among all patients with metabolic partial response to chemotherapy, the 2-year PFS was 72.8% (95% CI = 60.9-87%). Thirty-three of these patients (58%) were treated with planned radiation therapy alone, and 2-year PFS was 80.7% (95% CI = 66.6-97.9%). For those who did not receive radiation as part of their treatment, progression rate was 38% at 2 years.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the largest series of HL patients with partial metabolic response following primary chemotherapy. Our preliminary analysis showed that treatment with radiation was associated with good PFS at 2 years and many of those treated with radiation alone were cured.

Safety and Efficacy of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Ultra-Central Thoracic Tumors

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly utilized in the management of ultra-central thoracic tumors, although concerns regarding significant toxicity remain. We sought to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of SBRT to these tumors at our institution.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients with ultra-central lung tumors or nodes treated at our institution with SBRT between 2009 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Ultra-central was defined as having the planning target volume (PTV) overlapping or abutting the central bronchial tree and/or esophagus. All SBRT plans were generated with homogenous dose distributions using target coverage objectives of ITV V100% >99%, PTV V95% >99%, and an ideal PTV Dmax <105% (strict <120%). All plans were reviewed in quality assurance rounds by a team of dosimetrists, physicists, and radiation oncologists. The primary endpoint was incidence of severe toxicity (ST), defined as SBRT-related grade ≥3 toxicities, graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events V5.0. Secondary endpoints included local failure (LF), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Competing risk analysis was used to estimate incidence and predictors of ST and LF, with death as a competing risk. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS and OS.

RESULTS

A total of 154 patients who received 162 ultra-central courses of SBRT were included, with a median follow-up of 21.5 months. Treatment intent was most commonly for oligoprogression (46%), oligometastasis (30%), followed by curative (20%). The most frequent tumor histologies were NSCLC (41%) and RCC (26%). SBRT prescription doses ranged from 30-55 Gy in 5 fractions (BED10 range 48-115 Gy). The most common prescription was 50 Gy in 5 fractions (42%). The cumulative incidence of ST was 8.9% at 3-years. The most common ST was pneumonitis (n = 4). Notable toxicities included bronchopleural fistula (n = 2, grade 3 and 4), bronchial stricture (n = 1, grade 3), and esophagitis leading to bleeding (n = 1, grade 4). There were no esophageal strictures or perforations, and no bronchial bleeds. There was 1 possible treatment related death from pneumonitis/pneumonia. Predictors of any ST included increased lung V5 Gy, decreased PTV V95%, and not having prior radiation therapy to the chest. The cumulative incidence of LF was 4.8%, 11% and 14% at 1-, 2-, and 3-years respectively. Predictors of LF included younger age, and greater volume of overlap between the PTV and esophagus. Median PFS was 8.4 months, while median OS was 3.7 years.

CONCLUSION

In one of the largest case series of ultra-central thoracic SBRT reported to date, homogenously prescribed SBRT plans were associated with relatively low rates of ST and LF across a variety of treatment indications. Predictors of ST should be interpreted recognizing the heterogeneity in toxicities observed. Identified predictors of both ST and LF can contribute to future work to optimize the therapeutic ratio in treatment of ultra-central thoracic tumors.

Accelerated Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Centrally Located Lung Tumours Not Suitable for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy

AIMS

Accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy is used at our institution for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients not eligible for stereotactic body radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. The purpose of this study was to report clinical outcomes of delivering 60 Gy in 15 fractions for these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All NSCLC patients who received 60 Gy in 15 fractions were reviewed. Outcomes of interest were local failure, regional failure, distant progression, overall survival and treatment-associated toxicities.

RESULTS

In total, 111 patients were included. The median age was 78.8 years and most tumours were adenocarcinoma (n = 55, 49.6%). Sixty-five patients (58.6%) were N0. The cumulative incidence of local failure at 12 and 24 months in the N0 cohort was 5.2% and 14.2%, respectively, compared with 11.5% and 14.8% for N+ patients. Tumour size >35 mm predicted for local failure (hazard ratio 2.706, 95% confidence interval 1.002-7.307, P = 0.0494). Distant progression at 12 and 24 months in N0 patients was 13.7% and 24.3% compared with 24.6% and 33.5% in N+ patients. In N0 patients, larger tumour size was associated with increased risk of distant progression. The median overall survival was 38.1 months in N0 patients versus 31.7 months in N+ patients. The most common toxicity was radiation pneumonitis (n = 6, 6.4%). The incidence of any grade 3 toxicity was 10.3% at ≥1 year. There were no deaths or hospitalisations attributed to treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy is well tolerated and resulted in favourable clinical outcomes in various stages of NSCLC patients.