1
|
Alcázar JL, Carriles I, Cajas MB, Costa S, Fabra S, Cabrero M, Castro E, Tomaizeh A, Laza MV, Monroy A, Martinez I, Aguilar MI, Hernani E, Castellet C, Oliva A, Pascual MÁ, Guerriero S. Diagnostic Performance of Two-Dimensional Ultrasound, Two-Dimensional Sonohysterography and Three-Dimensional Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Septate Uterus-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13040807. [PMID: 36832295 PMCID: PMC9955687 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13040807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Revised: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The septate uterus is the most common congenital uterine anomaly, and hysteroscopy is the gold standard for diagnosing it. The goal of this meta-analysis is to perform a pooled analysis of the diagnostic performance of two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography, two-dimensional transvaginal sonohysterography, three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound, and three-dimensional transvaginal sonohysterography for the diagnosis of the septate uterus. METHODS Studies published between 1990 and 2022 were searched in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. From 897 citations, we selected eighteen studies to include in this meta-analysis. RESULTS The mean prevalence of uterine septum in this meta-analysis was 27.8%. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 83% and 99% for two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography (ten studies), 94% and 100% for two-dimensional transvaginal sonohysterography (eight studies), and 98% and 100% for three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound (seven articles), respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional transvaginal sonohysterography was only described in two studies, and we did not calculate the pooled sensitivity and specificity for this method. CONCLUSION Three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound has the best performance capacity for the diagnosis of the septate uterus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Luis Alcázar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
| | - Isabel Carriles
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
| | - María Belén Cajas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
| | - Susana Costa
- Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de São João, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
| | - Sofia Fabra
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofia, 28702 Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria Cabrero
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
| | - Elena Castro
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, 30120 Murcia, Spain
| | - Aida Tomaizeh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de Valme, 41701 Sevilla, Spain
| | - María Victoria Laza
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario Materno-Infantil, 06010 Badajoz, Spain
| | - Alba Monroy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario Materno-Infantil, 06010 Badajoz, Spain
| | - Irene Martinez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de Valme, 41701 Sevilla, Spain
| | - Maria Isabel Aguilar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de Valme, 41701 Sevilla, Spain
| | - Elena Hernani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital General Universitario de Castellón, 12004 Castellón, Spain
| | - Cristina Castellet
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproduction, Hospital Universitari Dexeus, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Agustin Oliva
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - María Ángela Pascual
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproduction, Hospital Universitari Dexeus, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Stefano Guerriero
- Centro Integrato di Procreazione Medicalmente Assistita (PMA) e Diagnostica Ostetrico-Ginecologica, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria-Policlinico Duilio Casula, Monserrato, 09042 Cagliari, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Maheux-Lacroix S, Bergeron C, Moore L, Bergeron MÈ, Lefebvre J, Grenier-Ouellette I, Dodin S. Hysterosalpingosonography Is Not as Effective as Hysterosalpingography to Increase Chances of Pregnancy. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2018; 41:593-598. [PMID: 30595514 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2018] [Revised: 08/31/2018] [Accepted: 09/28/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study sought to examine whether hysterosalpingosonography (sono-HSG) is as effective as hysterosalpingography (HSG) in facilitating conception by comparing pregnancy rates in the 6 months following the procedures. METHODS This retrospective noninferiority study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2) was conducted at a tertiary university centre. The investigators studied 440 consecutive eligible infertile women. Bilateral tubal occlusion, severe male infertility, and having undergone both procedures were exclusion criteria. Tubal testing, as part of the infertility workup, was performed by either sono-HSG or HSG. The primary outcome was pregnancy, defined as a positive fetal heartbeat on ultrasonographic examination, in the 6 months following the procedure. RESULTS A total of 57 pregnancies (26%) were observed in the HSG group and 33 (15%) in the sono-HSG group. Adjusted and non-adjusted relative risks of pregnancy in the 6 months following sono-HSG compared with HSG were 0.61 (95% CI 0.42-0.89) and 0.58 (95% CI 0.39-0.85). Adverse events were infrequent with both procedures (sono-HSG, 1%; HSG, 4%; P = 0.16). CONCLUSION This study suggests that uterine flushing as performed during sono-HSG is not as effective as when performed during HSG to increase the chances of pregnancy, but further studies will be required because of bias related to the retrospective study design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Maheux-Lacroix
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, QC; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval Research Centre, Québec, QC.
| | - Catherine Bergeron
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval Research Centre, Québec, QC
| | - Lynne Moore
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval Research Centre, Québec, QC
| | - Marie-Ève Bergeron
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, QC; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval Research Centre, Québec, QC
| | - Jessica Lefebvre
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, QC
| | | | - Sylvie Dodin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, QC; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval Research Centre, Québec, QC
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Grimbizis GF, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Saravelos SH, Gordts S, Exacoustos C, Van Schoubroeck D, Bermejo C, Amso NN, Nargund G, Timmerman D, Athanasiadis A, Brucker S, De Angelis C, Gergolet M, Li TC, Tanos V, Tarlatzis B, Farquharson R, Gianaroli L, Campo R. The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies. Hum Reprod 2015; 31:2-7. [PMID: 26537921 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dev264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2015] [Accepted: 09/14/2015] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION What is the recommended diagnostic work-up of female genital anomalies according to the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)/European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) system? SUMMARY ANSWER The ESHRE/ESGE consensus for the diagnosis of female genital anomalies is presented. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Accurate diagnosis of congenital anomalies still remains a clinical challenge because of the drawbacks of the previous classification systems and the non-systematic use of diagnostic methods with varying accuracy, some of them quite inaccurate. Currently, a wide range of non-invasive diagnostic procedures are available enriching the opportunity to accurately detect the anatomical status of the female genital tract, as well as a new objective and comprehensive classification system with well-described classes and sub-classes. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION The ESHRE/ESGE CONgenital UTerine Anomalies (CONUTA) Working Group established an initiative with the goal of developing a consensus for the diagnosis of female genital anomalies. The CONUTA working group and imaging experts in the field have been appointed to run the project. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS The consensus is developed based on: (i) evaluation of the currently available diagnostic methods and, more specifically, of their characteristics with the use of the experts panel consensus method and of their diagnostic accuracy by performing a systematic review of evidence and (ii) consensus for the definition of where and how to measure uterine wall thickness and the recommendations for the diagnostic work-up of female genital anomalies, based on the results of the previous evaluation procedure, with the use of the experts panel consensus method. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Uterine wall thickness is defined as the distance between the interostial line and external uterine profile at the midcoronal plane of the uterus; alternatively, if a coronal plane is not available, the mean anterior and posterior uterine wall thickness at the longitudinal plane could be used. Gynecological examination and two-dimensional ultrasound (2D US) are recommended for the evaluation of asymptomatic women. Three-dimensional (3D) US is recommended for the diagnosis of female genital anomalies in 'symptomatic' patients belonging to high risk groups for the presence of a female genital anomaly and in any asymptomatic woman suspected to have an anomaly from routine evaluation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoscopic evaluation are recommended for the subgroup of patients with suspected complex anomalies or in diagnostic dilemmas. Adolescents with symptoms suggestive for the presence of a female genital anomaly should be thoroughly evaluated with 2D US, 3D US, MRI and endoscopically. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The various diagnostic methods should always be used in the proper way and evaluated by experts to avoid mis-, over- and underdiagnosis. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The role of a combined US examination and outpatient hysteroscopy should be prospectively evaluated. It is a challenge for further research, based on diagnosis, to objectively evaluate the clinical consequences related to various degrees of uterine deformity. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grigoris F Grimbizis
- Congenital Uterine Anomalies (CONUTA) common ESHRE/ESGE Working Group and invited Experts, ESGE Central Office, Diestsevest 43/0001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo
- Congenital Uterine Anomalies (CONUTA) common ESHRE/ESGE Working Group and invited Experts, ESGE Central Office, Diestsevest 43/0001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sotirios H Saravelos
- Congenital Uterine Anomalies (CONUTA) common ESHRE/ESGE Working Group and invited Experts, ESGE Central Office, Diestsevest 43/0001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Stephan Gordts
- Congenital Uterine Anomalies (CONUTA) common ESHRE/ESGE Working Group and invited Experts, ESGE Central Office, Diestsevest 43/0001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Caterina Exacoustos
- Congenital Uterine Anomalies (CONUTA) common ESHRE/ESGE Working Group and invited Experts, ESGE Central Office, Diestsevest 43/0001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dominique Van Schoubroeck
- Congenital Uterine Anomalies (CONUTA) common ESHRE/ESGE Working Group and invited Experts, ESGE Central Office, Diestsevest 43/0001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Carmina Bermejo
- Congenital Uterine Anomalies (CONUTA) common ESHRE/ESGE Working Group and invited Experts, ESGE Central Office, Diestsevest 43/0001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nazar N Amso
- Congenital Uterine Anomalies (CONUTA) common ESHRE/ESGE Working Group and invited Experts, ESGE Central Office, Diestsevest 43/0001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Geeta Nargund
- Congenital Uterine Anomalies (CONUTA) common ESHRE/ESGE Working Group and invited Experts, ESGE Central Office, Diestsevest 43/0001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dirk Timmerman
- Congenital Uterine Anomalies (CONUTA) common ESHRE/ESGE Working Group and invited Experts, ESGE Central Office, Diestsevest 43/0001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Apostolos Athanasiadis
- Congenital Uterine Anomalies (CONUTA) common ESHRE/ESGE Working Group and invited Experts, ESGE Central Office, Diestsevest 43/0001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sara Brucker
- Congenital Uterine Anomalies (CONUTA) common ESHRE/ESGE Working Group and invited Experts, ESGE Central Office, Diestsevest 43/0001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Carlo De Angelis
- Congenital Uterine Anomalies (CONUTA) common ESHRE/ESGE Working Group and invited Experts, ESGE Central Office, Diestsevest 43/0001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marco Gergolet
- Congenital Uterine Anomalies (CONUTA) common ESHRE/ESGE Working Group and invited Experts, ESGE Central Office, Diestsevest 43/0001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tin Chiu Li
- Congenital Uterine Anomalies (CONUTA) common ESHRE/ESGE Working Group and invited Experts, ESGE Central Office, Diestsevest 43/0001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Vasilios Tanos
- Congenital Uterine Anomalies (CONUTA) common ESHRE/ESGE Working Group and invited Experts, ESGE Central Office, Diestsevest 43/0001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Basil Tarlatzis
- Congenital Uterine Anomalies (CONUTA) common ESHRE/ESGE Working Group and invited Experts, ESGE Central Office, Diestsevest 43/0001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Roy Farquharson
- Congenital Uterine Anomalies (CONUTA) common ESHRE/ESGE Working Group and invited Experts, ESGE Central Office, Diestsevest 43/0001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Luca Gianaroli
- Congenital Uterine Anomalies (CONUTA) common ESHRE/ESGE Working Group and invited Experts, ESGE Central Office, Diestsevest 43/0001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rudi Campo
- Congenital Uterine Anomalies (CONUTA) common ESHRE/ESGE Working Group and invited Experts, ESGE Central Office, Diestsevest 43/0001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015; 13:1-16. [PMID: 26918000 PMCID: PMC4753246 DOI: 10.1007/s10397-015-0909-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2015] [Accepted: 07/20/2015] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
What is the recommended diagnostic work-up of female genital anomalies according to the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)/European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) system? The ESHRE/ESGE consensus for the diagnosis of female genital anomalies is presented. Accurate diagnosis of congenital anomalies still remains a clinical challenge due to the drawbacks of the previous classification systems and the non-systematic use of diagnostic methods with varying accuracy, with some of them quite inaccurate. Currently, a wide range of non-invasive diagnostic procedures are available, enriching the opportunity to accurately detect the anatomical status of the female genital tract, as well as a new objective and comprehensive classification system with well-described classes and sub-classes. The ESHRE/ESGE Congenital Uterine Anomalies (CONUTA) Working Group established an initiative with the goal of developing a consensus for the diagnosis of female genital anomalies. The CONUTA working group and imaging experts in the field have been appointed to run the project. The consensus is developed based on (1) evaluation of the currently available diagnostic methods and, more specifically, of their characteristics with the use of the experts panel consensus method and of their diagnostic accuracy performing a systematic review of evidence and (2) consensus for (a) the definition of where and how to measure uterine wall thickness and (b) the recommendations for the diagnostic work-up of female genital anomalies, based on the results of the previous evaluation procedure, with the use of the experts panel consensus method. Uterine wall thickness is defined as the distance between interostial line and external uterine profile at the midcoronal plane of the uterus; alternatively, if a coronal plane is not available, the mean anterior and posterior uterine wall thickness at the longitudinal plane could be used. Gynaecological examination and two-dimensional ultrasound (2D US) are recommended for the evaluation of asymptomatic women. Three-dimensional ultrasound (3D US) is recommended for the diagnosis of female genital anomalies in “symptomatic” patients belonging to high-risk groups for the presence of a female genital anomaly and in any asymptomatic woman suspected to have an anomaly from routine avaluation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoscopic evaluation are recommended for the sub-group of patients with suspected complex anomalies or in diagnostic dilemmas. Adolescents with symptoms suggestive for the presence of a female genital anomaly should be thoroughly evaluated with 2D US, 3D US, MRI and endoscopy. The various diagnostic methods should be used in a proper way and evaluated by experts to avoid mis-, over- and underdiagnosis. The role of a combined ultrasound examination and outpatient hysteroscopy should be prospectively evaluated. It is a challenge for further research, based on diagnosis, to objectively evaluate the clinical consequences related to various degrees of uterine deformity.
Collapse
|
5
|
Seshadri S, El-Toukhy T, Douiri A, Jayaprakasan K, Khalaf Y. Diagnostic accuracy of saline infusion sonography in the evaluation of uterine cavity abnormalities prior to assisted reproductive techniques: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Hum Reprod Update 2014; 21:262-74. [DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmu057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
6
|
Torre A, Pouly JL, Wainer B. [Anatomic evaluation of the female of the infertile couple]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2011; 39:S34-44. [PMID: 21185484 DOI: 10.1016/s0368-2315(10)70029-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
One third of infertility cases are due to anatomical abnormalities of the female reproductive tract: endometrial polyps (33%), bilateral tubal blockage (12%), hydrosalpinx (7%), sub-mucosal fibroids (3%) and pelvic endometriosis. These may need surgical correction which could restore fertility. This review aim to determine which examinations should be performed first. Hysterosalpingography shows sensitivity of only 65% but it increases the achievement of spontaneous pregnancy by three times. Office hysteroscopy has an excellent sensitivity (>95%) for diagnosing intra-uterine lesions. Pelvic ultrasound, whose good sensitivity is improved by adding 3D imaging and hysterosonography, seems as efficient as office hysteroscopy in diagnosing uterine cavity abnormalities. Moreover, it also efficiently diagnoses pelvic diseases such as hydrosalpinx or endometrioma without laparoscopy. A first line laparoscopy is indicated in for woman suspected of endometriosis or tubal pathology (history of complicated appendicitis, previous pelvic surgery, pelvic inflammatory disease). For the others straight forward cases, the majority of patients, hysterosalpingography and pelvic ultrasound seem to be sufficient as primary diagnostic tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Torre
- Faculté de médecine Paris-Ouest, Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, 9 boulevard d'Alembert, 78280 Guyancourt, France.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bohlmann MK, von Wolff M, Luedders DW, Beuter-Winkler P, Diedrich K, Hornemann A, Strowitzki T. Hysteroscopic findings in women with two and with more than two first-trimester miscarriages are not significantly different. Reprod Biomed Online 2010; 21:230-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2009] [Revised: 02/01/2010] [Accepted: 03/15/2010] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|