Prostate Cancer Foundation Screening Guidelines for Black Men in the United States

Histopathology-Based Prostate Cancer Classification Using ResNet: A Comprehensive Deep Learning Analysis

Prostate cancer is the most prevalent solid tumor in males and one of the most common causes of male mortality. It is the most common type of cancer in men, a major global public health issue, and accounts for up to 7.3% of all male cancer diagnoses worldwide. To optimize patient outcomes and ensure therapeutic success, an accurate diagnosis must be made promptly. To achieve this, we focused on using ResNet50, a convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture, to analyze prostate histological images to classify prostate cancer. ResNet50, due to its efficiency in medical image classification, was used to classify the histological images as benign or malignant. In this study, a total of 1276 prostate biopsy images were used on the ResNet50 model. We employed evaluation metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. The results showed that the ResNet50 model performed excellently with an overall accuracy of 0.98, 1.00 as precision, 0.98 as recall, and 0.97 as F1 score for benign. The malignant histological image has 0.99, 0.98, and 0.97 as precision, recall, and F1 scores. It also recorded a 95% confidence interval (CI) for accuracy as (0.91, 1.00) and a performance gain of 4.26% compared to MobileNet and CNN-RNN. The result of our model was also compared with the state-of-the-art (SOTA) DL models to ensure robustness. This study has demonstrated the potential of the ResNet50 model in the classification of prostate cancer. Again, the clinical integration of the results of this study will aid decision-makers in enhancing patient outcomes.

Prostate Cancer Foundation White Paper on Combination Therapy for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

Despite several randomized controlled trials demonstrating the benefits of combination therapies for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), a significant treatment gap persists. This initiative by the Prostate Cancer Foundation (PCF) convened stakeholders from academia, community practices, industry, and patient advocacy groups to address critical challenges in mHSPC care. Expert discussions and a review of real-world evidence and meta-analyses informed the development of strategies to improve care delivery. Evaluation of the data from global registries, such as IRONMAN, and large community databases was used to assess treatment utilization patterns and disparities. Combination therapies with two agents-androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI)-or three agents-ADT + ARPI + docetaxel-demonstrate significant survival improvements while preserving quality of life for patients with mHSPC, yet adoption remains inconsistent. Of the eligible patients, 20%-60% remain undertreated, with geographic, financial, and systemic barriers contributing to inconsistencies in care. Younger, White, urban-dwelling patients with fewer comorbidities are more likely to receive combination treatment, highlighting disparities across populations. Meta-analyses identified a lack of standardization due to varying inclusion criteria and comparators across trials. Real-world evidence underscored disparities influenced by geographic location, practice type, and access to specialty care. Initiatives such as the PANTHER study highlight improved outcomes in Black patients treated with combination therapies, emphasizing the importance of including diverse populations in clinical trials. To bridge gaps in care, this initiative prioritizes awareness, standardization, and equitable access to evidence-based therapies. Proposed solutions include targeted knowledge dissemination strategies, development of educational resources, and advocacy for policy changes to promote guideline-concordant care. By leveraging collaborative efforts, organizations, including PCF, can contribute to enhancing survival outcomes and quality of life for all patients with mHSPC.

Prostate Cancer: A Review

Importance

Prostate cancer is the most common nonskin cancer in men in the US, with an estimated 299 010 new cases and 35 250 deaths in 2024. Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men worldwide, with 1 466 680 new cases and 396 792 deaths in 2022.

Observations

The most common type of prostate cancer is adenocarcinoma (≥99%), and the median age at diagnosis is 67 years. More than 50% of prostate cancer risk is attributable to genetic factors; older age and Black race (annual incidence rate, 173.0 cases per 100 000 Black men vs 97.1 cases per 100 000 White men) are also strong risk factors. Recent guidelines encourage shared decision-making for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening. At diagnosis, approximately 75% of patients have cancer localized to the prostate, which is associated with a 5-year survival rate of nearly 100%. Based on risk stratification that incorporates life expectancy, tumor grade (Gleason score), tumor size, and PSA level, one-third of patients with localized prostate cancer are appropriate for active surveillance with serial PSA measurements, prostate biopsies, or magnetic resonance imaging, and initiation of treatment if the Gleason score or tumor stage increases. For patients with higher-risk disease, radiation therapy or radical prostatectomy are reasonable options; treatment decision-making should include consideration of adverse events and comorbidities. Despite definitive therapy, 2% to 56% of men with localized disease develop distant metastases, depending on tumor risk factors. At presentation, approximately 14% of patients have metastases to regional lymph nodes. An additional 10% of men have distant metastases that are associated with a 5-year survival rate of 37%. Treatment of metastatic prostate cancer primarily relies on androgen deprivation therapy, most commonly through medical castration with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists. For patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer, the addition of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (eg, darolutamide, abiraterone) improves survival. Use of abiraterone improved the median overall survival from 36.5 months to 53.3 months (hazard ratio, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.56-0.78]) compared with medical castration alone. Chemotherapy (docetaxel) may be considered, especially for patients with more extensive disease.

Conclusions and Relevance

Approximately 1.5 million new cases of prostate cancer are diagnosed annually worldwide. Approximately 75% of patients present with cancer localized to the prostate, which is associated with a 5-year survival rate of nearly 100%. Management includes active surveillance, prostatectomy, or radiation therapy, depending on risk of progression. Approximately 10% of patients present with metastatic prostate cancer, which has a 5-year survival rate of 37%. First-line therapies for metastatic prostate cancer include androgen deprivation and novel androgen receptor pathway inhibitors, and chemotherapy for appropriate patients.

Contemporary neighborhood redlining and racial mortgage lending bias and disparities in prostate cancer survival

BACKGROUND

Mortgage lending bias is a critical driver of residential segregation, and may contribute to disparities in cancer survival. This study investigated the association between contemporary redlining and racial lending bias and prostate cancer survival.

METHODS

This cohort study used a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database that included 34,163 Black and White men diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2010 and 2013. Home Mortgage Disclosure Act data were used to calculate the census-tract redlining index (the systematic denial of mortgages based on property location) and racial lending bias index (the systematic denial of a mortgage application for a Black applicant compared with a White applicant in the local area). Both indices were assessed continuously and categorically (low, moderate, or high). Multivariable-adjusted Cox models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for prostate cancer-specific and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Overall, as the redlining index increased, men experienced poorer prostate cancer survival. Compared to men residing in low-redlined neighborhoods, those in high-redlined neighborhoods had an increased risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality (HR, 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.42) and all-cause mortality (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.17-1.34). Similar results were observed for redlining in a race-stratified analysis among Black and White men. Among White men, compared with those residing in low racial lending bias neighborhoods, those in high racial lending bias neighborhoods had an increased all-cause mortality risk (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.03-1.21).

CONCLUSIONS

Contemporary redlining was associated with poorer prostate cancer survival in the overall population. However, an association between racial lending bias and elevated mortality was only observed among White men. Findings suggest that mortgage lending discrimination may contribute to disparities in prostate cancer survival.

A multi-perspective study assessing Black and African American participation barriers in prostate cancer clinical trials

AIMS

This study aimed to partner with patients, advocates, and physicians to better understand the barriers that exist for Black and African Americans to enroll in prostate cancer (PCa) clinical trials.

PATIENTS & METHODS

Through moderated discussions with patients, advocates, and physicians, we identified potential opportunities to increase the enrollment of underrepresented patients in PCa clinical trials.

RESULTS

We identified key barriers to Black and African American enrollment in PCa clinical trials that were shared by all groups but also identified group-specific barriers. We developed recommendations based on key themes that have the potential to increase the enrollment of Black and African Americans in PCa clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

While racial diversity in PCa clinical trials remains an unsolved problem, there are significant opportunities to better address this unmet need. Through a multi-perspective approach to identify key barriers that limit Black and African American enrollment in PCa clinical trials, we developed recommendations for both sponsors and clinical trial sites to increase diverse patient enrollment in PCa clinical trials, with a focus on employing practical strategies.

Racial disparities in prostate cancer in the UK and the USA: similarities, differences and steps forwards

In the USA, Black men are approximately twice as likely to be diagnosed with and to die of prostate cancer than white men. In the UK, despite Black men having vastly different ancestral contexts and health-care systems from Black men in the USA, the lifetime risk of being diagnosed with prostate cancer is two-to-three times higher among Black British men than among white British men and Black British men are twice as likely to die of prostate cancer as white British men. Examination of racial disparities in prostate cancer in the USA and UK highlights systemic, socio-economic and sociocultural factors that might contribute to these differences. Variation by ancestry could affect incidence and tumour genomics. Disparities in incidence might also be affected by screening guidelines and access to and uptake of screening. Disparities in treatment access, continuity of care and outcomes could contribute to survival differences. In both localized and metastatic settings, equal access could diminish the observed disparities in both the USA and the UK. An understanding of behavioural medicine, especially an appreciation of cultural beliefs about illness and treatment, could inform and improve the ways in which health systems can engage with and deliver care to patients in minoritized groups affected by prostate cancer. Methods of promoting equity include targeting systemic barriers including systemic racism, proportional recruitment of patients into clinical trials, diversifying the health-care workforce and facilitating care informed by cultural humility. Actively engaging patients and communities in research and intervention might enable the translation of research into increasingly equitable care for patients with prostate cancer in the UK, the USA and globally.

Prostate Cancer Mortality in Men Aged 70 Years Who Recently Underwent Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening

Importance

Continuing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening after age 70 years might benefit men at high risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) or metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa), but the relative value of clinical factors (race and ethnicity, competing mortality, and PSA history) in identifying men at higher vs lower risk is unknown.

Objective

To examine the value of PSA levels, race and ethnicity, and competing mortality in risk stratification for PCSM and mPCa in men after age 70 years.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this cohort study, clinical data of all men receiving health care through the Veterans Health Administration who turned age 70 years between 2008 and 2020 and had a normal screening PSA value between age 65 and 69 years (<4 ng/mL [baseline PSA]) and no prior history of prostate cancer or biopsy were examined. The data cutoff date was December 26, 2023.

Exposure

The most recent screening PSA value from age 65 to 69 years, self-reported race and ethnicity, and competing mortality risk derived from a machine learning model.

Main Outcome and Measures

The 10-year absolute risk of PCSM and mPCa were determined using regression modeling.

Results

The cohort included 921 609 men who turned 70 years between 2008 and 2020; 11% of whom self-reported as Black and 82% as White race. Between age 65 and 70 years, 45% of patients had a baseline PSA of less than 1.00 ng/mL, and 32% had a baseline PSA of 1.00 to 1.99 ng/mL. Most patients (87%) continued to undergo screening past age 70 years, with little variation by competing mortality risk or race and ethnicity. The 10-year cumulative incidence of PCSM was 0.26% overall, and 95% of men had a 10-year risk less than 0.73%. Higher baseline PSA level between age 65 and 69 years was associated with 10-year PCSM risk (0.79% for 3.00-3.99 ng/mL vs 0.10% for 0.20-0.99 ng/mL), race and ethnicity (0.36% for Black vs 0.25% for White), and competing mortality (0.24% for the highest quintile vs 0.21% for the lowest quintile). Similar results were found for mPCa. Low PSA (0.20-0.99 ng/mL) was associated with very low PCSM and mPCa risk, even among Black men in the healthiest quintile of competing mortality risk (10-year PCSM risk, 0.08% [95% CI, 0.01%-0.44%]; 10-year mPCa risk 0.24% [95% CI, 0.10%-0.52%]).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, the findings suggest that most men receiving care through the VHA continue PSA screening after age 70 years despite low absolute 10-year PCSM risks. The PSA values from age 65 to 69 years may be highly informative for adverse prostate cancer outcomes after age 70 years, with a PSA less than 1 ng/mL associated with a very low risk of long-term PCSM and mPCa.

Racial disparity in prostate cancer: an outlook in genetic and molecular landscape

Prostate cancer (PCa) incidence, morbidity, and mortality rates are significantly impacted by racial disparities. Despite innovative therapeutic approaches and advancements in prevention, men of African American (AA) ancestry are at a higher risk of developing PCa and have a more aggressive and metastatic form of the disease at the time of initial PCa diagnosis than other races. Research on PCa has underlined the biological and molecular basis of racial disparity and emphasized the genetic aspect as the fundamental component of racial inequality. Furthermore, the lower enrollment rate, limited access to national-level cancer facilities, and deferred treatment of AA men and other minorities are hurdles in improving the outcomes of PCa patients. This review provides the most up-to-date information on various biological and molecular contributing factors, such as the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), mutational spectrum, altered chromosomal loci, differential gene expression, transcriptome analysis, epigenetic factors, tumor microenvironment (TME), and immune modulation of PCa racial disparities. This review also highlights future research avenues to explore the underlying biological factors contributing to PCa disparities, particularly in men of African ancestry.

Prostate Cancer: Burden and Correlation with Prostate Specific Antigen Among Screened African Men in Tanzania

Background

Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a widely used maker for prostate cancer (PCa) screening. However, its correlation with PCa varies, partly due to ethnic differences. This study investigated the correlation between PSA and PCa diagnosis as well as the burden of the disease in the Tanzanian community.

Methods

This community-based PCa screening took place in Northern Tanzania from May 2022 to September 2022, where men aged ≥40 years were involved. Each participant provided 5 milliliters of venous blood for PSA determination. Those with PSA levels >4 ng/mL underwent prostate biopsy. Two pathologists independently evaluated the biopsies. The correlation between PSA and biopsy results was assessed using STATA version 17.0.

Results

The study included 6164 African men with a mean age of 60±11 years. Of these, 912 (14.8%) had PSA >4 ng/mL, and hence 581 (63.7%) underwent prostate biopsy. A total of 179 men (30.8%) were histologically diagnosed with prostatic adenocarcinoma, whereby 46 (25.7%) had Gleason scores 8-9. Among participants with PSA >20 ng/mL, over 2/3 (64.7%) had PCa, rising to nearly 100% at PSA >100 ng/mL. A positive correlation between PSA levels and PCa/aggressive disease was observed. PSA sensitivity decreased with rising levels, hitting 78.2% at >10ng/mL and 24.6% at >100ng/mL, while specificity increased, peaking at 99.8% for >100ng/mL from 73.9% at >10ng/mL. The optimal PSA cut point was >10ng/mL. PSA demonstrated an 84% overall ability to predict PCa and a 71% ability to predict aggressive disease.

Conclusion

This study found a notable presence of intermediate-high grade PCa within the community, suggesting the need for regular screening and management. Moreover, PSA demonstrated clinically useful ability in predicting PCa among African men aged 40 years and older.

How Can Guidelines Give Clearer Guidance on Prostate Cancer Screening?

This Viewpoint explores how guideline groups can come together to agree on a framework that produces clear and unified recommendations.

Lethal Prostate Cancer in Mexico: Data from the Can.Prost Mexican Registry and a Project for Early Detection

INTRODUCTION

Epidemiological data are crucial for adopting primary and secondary prevention strategies and to develop screening protocols against prostate cancer (PCa). Despite the comprehensive characterization of PCa across White and Black men, there is a lack of data from the Mexican population. This manuscript presents data from the Can.Prost registry that captures PCa trends over the past two decades in Mexico City; furthermore, we aimed to compare clinical differences and oncological outcomes before and after the promotion of early detection actions through a campaign against PCa that occurred in 2014.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study on newly diagnosed Mexican PCa patients was carried out at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan) in Mexico City. During 2014 and 2015, a project for the early diagnosis of PCa ("OPUS program") was launched in the aforementioned tertiary hospital. Starting at the age of 45 years, all men were invited for a PSA measurement and a specialist urologist consultation. All individuals with clinical or biochemical suspicion of PCa (PSA > 4 ng/mL), in the context of age and prostate volume, underwent ultrasound-guided transrectal prostate biopsy. Then, patients with pathologically confirmed prostate cancer were stratified according to the year of diagnosis: Group A accounted for those diagnosed between 2000 and 2014 and Group B for those patients diagnosed in the timeframe of 2015-2021. Comparisons of PCa characteristics, treatment modalities and oncologic outcomes between Group A and B were performed.

RESULTS

Overall, we collected data from 2759 PCa patients from 2000 to 2021. The median PSA at baseline was 32 ng/mL, and 25% had a family history of PCa. Overall, 25.8% were asymptomatic and 46% had a non-metastatic presentation. After the OPUS campaign, PSA at diagnosis was significantly lower across all age groups. The incidence of PCa diagnosis in asymptomatic men was higher (31.4% vs. 19.9%) and a higher proportion of men were diagnosed with organ-confined, palpable disease (46% vs. 28%) (p < 0.001). The rate of patients eligible for active/radical treatment was higher after the OPUS campaign (patients who received surgery increased from 12.78% to 32.41%; patients who underwent radiation increased from 28.38% to 49.61%). The proportion of patients diagnosed with non-clinically significant disease was negligible and remained stable across time.

CONCLUSIONS

PCa in Mexican patients displays aggressive features at diagnosis, whereas the rate of non-significant disease is negligible. The introduction of early detection strategies may lead to lower symptomatic and metastatic PCa and higher opportunities for radical treatment. This emphasizes the need for public awareness and for adjustment of screening strategies to the peculiarities of the Mexican population.