Intensive postremission chemotherapy in adults with acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer and Leukemia Group B

Treating acute myelogenous leukemia in patients aged 70 and above: Recommendations from the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG)

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treatment is challenging in older patients. There is a lack of evidence-based recommendations for older patients ≥70, a group largely underrepresented in clinical trials. With new treatment options being available in recent years, recommendations are needed for these patients. As such the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) assembled a task force to review the evidence specific to treatment and outcomes in this population of patients ≥70 years. Six questions were selected by the expert panel in domains of (1) baseline assessment, (2) frontline therapy, (3) post-remission therapy, (4) treatment for relapse, (5) targeted therapies, and (6) patient reported outcome/function and enhancing treatment tolerance. Information from current literature was extracted, combining evidence from systematic reviews/meta-analyses, decision models, individual trials targeting these patients, and subgroup data. Accordingly, recommendations were generated using a GRADE approach upon reviewing current evidence by consensus of the whole panel. It is our firm recommendation and hope that direct evidence should be generated for patients aged ≥70 as a distinct group in high need of improvement of their survival outcomes. Such studies should integrate information from a geriatric assessment to optimize external validity and outcomes.

Literature review and expert opinion on the treatment of high-risk acute myeloid leukemia in patients who are eligible for intensive chemotherapy

In patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), the assessment of disease risk plays a central role in the era of personalized medicine. Indeed, integrating baseline clinical and biological features on a case-by-case basis is not only essential to select which treatment would likely result in a higher probability of achieving complete remission, but also to dynamically customize any subsequent therapeutic intervention. For young high-risk patients with low comorbidities burden and in good general conditions (also called "fit" patients), intensive chemotherapy followed by allogeneic stem cell transplantation still represents the backbone of any therapeutic program. However, with the approval of novel promising agents in both the induction/consolidation and the maintenance setting, the algorithms for the management of AML patients considered eligible for intensive chemotherapy are in constant evolution. In this view, we selected burning issues regarding the identification and management of high-risk AML, aiming to provide practical advice to facilitate their daily clinical management in patients considered eligible for intensive chemotherapy.

KIT exon 17 mutations are predictive of inferior outcome in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia with RUNX1::RUNX1T1

BACKGROUND

Pediatric core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML), although considered a favorable risk subtype, exhibits variable outcomes primarily driven by additional genetic abnormalities, such as KIT mutations.

PROCEDURE

In this study, we examined the prognostic impact of KIT mutations in 130 pediatric patients with CBF-AML, treated uniformly at a single center over 4 years (2017-2021). KIT mutations were detected via next-generation sequencing using a myeloid panel comprising 52 genes for most patients.

RESULTS

Our findings revealed that KIT mutations were present in 31% of CBF-AML cases. Exon 17 KIT mutation was most commonly (72%) seen with notable occurrences at the D816 and N822 residue in 48% and 39% of cases, respectively. The 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and overall survival (OS) for patients with exon 17 KIT mutation were 36% and 40%, respectively, and was significantly worse in comparison to other site KIT mutations (3-year CIR: 11%; OS: 64%) and without KIT mutation (3-year CIR: 13%; OS:71%). Notably, the prognostic impact of KIT mutations was prominent in patients with RUNX1::RUNX1T1, but not in those with CBFB::MYH11 fusion. Additionally, a high KIT variant-allele frequency (VAF) (>33%) predicted for a higher disease relapse; 3-year CIR of 40% for VAF greater than 33% versus 7% for VAF less than 33%. When adjusted for site of KIT mutation and end-of-induction measurable residual disease, VAF greater than 33% correlated with poor OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.4 [95% CI: 1.2-17.2], p = .034).

CONCLUSION

Exon 17 KIT mutations serve as an important predictor of relapse in RUNX1::RUNX1T1 pediatric AML. In addition, a high KIT VAF may predict poor outcomes in these patients. These results emphasize the need to incorporate KIT mutational analysis into risk stratification for pediatric CBF-AML.

A randomized phase III study of standard versus high-dose cytarabine with or without vorinostat for AML

Prior experience indicated that use of higher doses of cytarabine during induction for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with a histone deacetylase inhibitor resulted in high response rates. S1203 was a randomized multicenter trial for previously untreated patients aged 18-60 with AML which compared daunorubicin and cytarabine (DA), idarubicin with higher dose cytarabine (IA) and IA with vorinostat (IA + V). The primary endpoint was event free survival (EFS). 738 patients were randomized: 261 to each DA and IA arms and 216 to the IA + V arm. 96, 456, and 150 patients had favorable-, intermediate-, and unfavorable-risk cytogenetics, respectively. 152 were NPM1 and 158 FLT3 mutated. The overall remission rate was 77.5% including 62.5% CR and 15.0% CRi. No differences in remission, EFS, or overall survival were observed among the 3 arms except for the favorable cytogenetics subset who had improved outcomes with DA and postremission high dose cytarabine. A trend towards increased toxicity was observed with the IA and IA + V arms. The use of higher dose cytarabine during induction therapy in younger patients with AML, with or without vorinostat, does not result in improved outcomes. (Funded by the US National Institutes of Health and others, ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01802333.).

Acute myeloid leukemia: challenges for diagnosis and treatment in Latin America

OBJECTIVE

to review the current diagnostic and therapeutic landscape of AML in Latin America as a reflection of other low- and middle-income countries and regions of the world. Encompassing both acute promyelocytic and non-promyelocytic disease types.

METHODS

We reviewed the literature and study registries concerning epidemiological features of patients with AML/APL treated in Latin America, as well as evaluated diagnostic and genetic stratification and patient fitness assessment challenges, the importance of early mortality and supportive care capacity, intensive and non-intensive chemotherapy alternatives, consolidation, and maintenance strategies including novel agents and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

RESULTS

Although most of the current technologies and treatment options are available in the region, a significant fraction of patients have only limited access to them. In addition, mortality in the first weeks from diagnosis is higher in the region compared to developed countries.

CONCLUSIONS

Disparities in access to technologies, supportive care capacity, and availability of novel agents and HSCT hinder results in our region, reflecting barriers common to other LMICs. Recent developments in the diagnosis and treatment of this disease must be implemented through education, collaborative clinical research, and advocacy to improve outcomes.

Outpatient consolidation chemotherapy with intermediate dose cytarabine has similar survival and relapses rates in acute myeloid leukemia as compared to high dose cytarabine: A single center analysis

INTRODUCTION

The last decade has seen advances in delivering outpatient consolidation therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The standard of care involves high-dose cytarabine or intermediate-dose cytarabine, given twice daily for three alternating days. At the London Regional Cancer Program, we have transitioned the administration of outpatient cytarabine to a once-daily regimen over six consecutive days. The outcomes of a longer duration interval of high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine is currently unknown. This study aims to assess the feasibility of administering a continuous 6-day protocol of high-dose (HDAC-16) and intermediate-dose cytarabine (IDAC-16) consolidation therapy in the outpatient setting.

METHODS

This is a retrospective chart review to analyze AML patients treated with outpatient high-dose or intermediate-dose cytarabine consolidation therapy at the London Regional Cancer Program from January 1, 2019, through November 1, 2022. The primary objective was to determine the outcomes of the 6-day outpatient administration of once daily high-dose cytarabine or intermediate-dose cytarabine.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients received 89 cycles of cytarabine as outpatients; males were 55.6% of the total population, with a median age of ~57 years. Our overall 2-year survival of HDAC-16 (57.1%) and IDAC-16 (83.3%) is consistent with the reported literature. There was no difference in delays, relapse rates, and nonrelapse mortality between both HDAC and IDAC groups. The 2-year relapse free survival was 57.1% for HDAC-16 and 66.7% for IDAC-16.

CONCLUSION

Outpatient administration of intermediate-dose cytarabine once daily over six consecutive days results in similar overall survival and relapse rates as compared to high dose cytarabine consolidation chemotherapy. Moving to a once daily administration schedule can alleviate logistical and/or accessibility hurdles for outpatient oncology clinics. Prospective randomized trials are needed in this setting to validate our results.

Consecutive day dosing of high-dose cytarabine consolidation over 3 days is resource-efficient and safe in older adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia

High-dose cytarabine (HDAC) is conventionally delivered on days 1, 3 and 5 (HDAC-135) as acute myeloid leukemia (AML) post-remission therapy. Limited data is available on alternative HDAC schedules such as HDAC-123 (given consecutively for 3 days). We retrospectively compared the tolerability and efficacy of HDAC-135 and HDAC-123 delivered in sequential cohorts of adult AML patients. Seventy-three patients were included with 33% aged ≥60 years. HDAC-123 was associated with faster hematological recovery, reduced bacteremia and shorter hospitalization. No differences in safety profile or hematological recovery were seen between patients ≥60 years and <60 years receiving HDAC-123 except a shorter median time to neutrophil count recovery after cycle 1 in the latter group. Three patients (8%) receiving HDAC-123, all aged <60 years, required a change in schedule to HDAC-135 due to transient cytarabine-related side effects. HDAC-123 consolidation was well-tolerated by AML patients, including those ≥60 years, and associated with tangible reductions in resource utilization.

Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Older Adults

Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is an aggressive myeloid malignancy predominantly affecting older adults. Despite the advancements in new therapies for AML, older and medically unfit patients continue to suffer from poor outcomes due to disease-related factors such as the mutational profile and patient-related factors such as comorbidities and performance status. In this review, we discuss a spectrum of therapeutic options for older patients with AML starting with a historical perspective and ending with therapies being investigated in clinical trials. We review the standard of care treatment options including combination venetoclax and hypomethylating agents, in addition to targeted therapies such as FLT3 and IDH inhibitors. Lastly, we shed light on challenges facing the care of older adults and their representation in clinical trials.

Impact of different chemotherapy regimens on intestinal mucosal injury assessed with bedside ultrasound: a study in 213 AML patients

Introduction

Neutropenic enterocolitis (NEC) is a life-threatening complication reported in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) following chemotherapy (CHT). Intensive induction and consolidation CHT may damage intestinal mucosa leading to a NEC episode (NECe). NEC reported mortality may be up to 30-60%. Early US-guided bed-side diagnosis and prompt treatment may substantially improve the survival. An emerging worldwide concern is the intestinal colonization by multi-drug-resistant bacteria especially when patients are exposed to chemotherapy regimens potentially correlated to mucosal damage.

Methods

In our study we prospectively enrolled all AML patients admitted in our leukemia unit to receive intensive induction and consolidation chemotherapy and experiencing chemotherapy-induced-neutropenia (CHTN).

Results and discussion

Overall, we enrolled N=213 patients from 2007 to March 2023. We recorded N=465 CHTN, and N=42 NECe (9.0% incidence). The aim of our study was to assess which chemotherapy regimens are more associated with NEC. We found that ALM1310, followed by 7 + 3 (daunorubicin), 7 + 3 (idarubicin), 5 + 3 + 3 (cytarabine, etoposide, idarubicin), and AML1310 (consolidation) were associated with a statistically higher incidence of NEC. We did not detect NEC episodes in patients treated with CPX-351, 5 + 2 (cytarabine, idarubicine), and high-dose cytarabine. Thus, we found that cytarabine could determine mucosal damage when associated with an anthracycline but not if delivered either alone or as dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of daunorubicin/cytarabine. We also describe NEC mortality, symptoms at diagnosis, intestinal sites involvement, and prognostic significance of bowel wall thickening.

The core concepts of core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia: Current considerations for prognosis and treatment

Core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF AML), defined by t(8;21) or inv(16), is a subset of favorable risk AML. Despite its association with a high complete remission rate after induction and relatively good prognosis overall compared with other subtypes of AML, relapse risk after induction chemotherapy remains high. Optimizing treatment planning to promote recurrence free survival and increase the likelihood of survival after relapse is imperative to improving outcomes. Recent areas of research have included evaluation of the role of gemtuzumab in induction and consolidation, the relative benefit of increased cycles of high dose cytarabine in consolidation, the utility of hypomethylating agents and kinase inhibitors, and the most appropriate timing of stem cell transplant. Surveillance with measurable residual disease testing is increasingly being utilized for monitoring disease in remission, and ongoing investigation seeks to determine how to use this tool for early identification of patients who would benefit from proceeding to transplant. In this review, we outline the current therapeutic approach from diagnosis to relapse while highlighting the active areas of investigation in each stage of treatment.

Insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor inhibits the proliferation of acute myeloid leukaemia cells via NK cell activation

Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) denotes a heterogeneous category of cancers occurring within the bone marrow that are initiated by the unrestricted proliferation of haematopoietic stem cells. Various factors effectuate the dysregulation of AML cell proliferation; for instance, the upregulation of insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R) within AML cells influences their proliferation. However, there is a current dearth of research assessing the association between IGF1R and prognostic risk as well as its potential as an AML immunotherapeutic. This study aims to elucidate the role of IGF1R in AML progression and evaluate its prognostic value. To this end, RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database was analysed to compare IGF1R expression between AML and normal tissues. Moreover, a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to determine whether IGF1R expression correlates with patient overall survival (OS). TCGA data revealed upregulated IGF1R expression in the peripheral blood of AML patients compared to that in healthy individuals. Meanwhile, IGF1R expression positively correlates with patient OS. Additionally, elevated IGF1R expression promotes NK cell expansion and enhances its functional activation, thereby inhibiting AML cell proliferation. Collectively, these findings highlight the clinical potential of IGF1R in the effective treatment of AML through the activation of NK cell proliferation and function and suggest that it may represent a potential predictive marker of AML prognosis.

Toxicity and outcome of adults with acute myeloid leukemia receiving consolidation with high-dose cytarabine

INTRODUCTION

High-dose cytarabine is considered standard of care as consolidation chemotherapy in adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are not eligible for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, but may be associated with significant toxicity. We evaluated the toxicity associated with high-dose cytarabine given as consolidation in AML patients treated at a Brazilian public hospital.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all patients with AML treated between 2008 and 2020 who obtained complete remission (CR) after one cycle of induction chemotherapy and received consolidation with at least one cycle of high-dose cytarabine (defined as 3 g/m2 every 12 h days 1, 3 and 5).

RESULTS

Among 61 patients who received induction remission, 32 obtained CR and 28 received at least one cycle of high-dose cytarabine, for a total of 67 cycles (median 2 cycles per patient, range 1 - 4). In 45 cycles (67.2%) the patient was discharged after the end of chemotherapy, with a median of 6 days at home (range 3 - 8). Readmission occurred in 31 of the 45 cycles (68.9%). The most frequent toxicities were febrile neutropenia (56.7%), nausea and vomiting (23.9%), oral mucositis (14.9%) and diarrhea (11.9%). Bacteremia was documented in 13 cycles (34.2%). There were three cases of typhlitis and two of invasive fungal disease (aspergillosis and candidemia). Four patients died (14.3%), with two deaths considered treatment-related (candidemia and typhlitis).

CONCLUSION

In the setting of a Brazilian public hospital, high-dose cytarabine as consolidation therapy is feasible, with manageable toxicity profile.

More than two courses of pre-transplant consolidation therapy benefits patients with acute myeloid leukemia in the first complete remission who underwent human leukocyte antigen-matched sibling allografts: a multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Although the need for consolidation chemotherapy after successful induction therapy is well established in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1), the value of consolidation chemotherapy before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains controversial.

METHODS

We retrospectively compared the effect of the number of pre-transplant consolidation chemotherapies on outcomes of human leukocyte antigen-matched sibling stem cell transplantation (MSDT) for patients with AML in CR1 in multicenters across China. In our study, we analyzed data of 373 AML patients in CR1 from three centers across China.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 969 days, patients with ≥ 3 courses of consolidation chemotherapy had higher probabilities of leukemia-free survival (LFS) (85.6% vs . 67.0%, P < 0.001) and overall survival (89.2% vs . 78.5%, P  = 0.007), and better cumulative incidences of relapse (10.5% vs . 19.6%, P  = 0.020) and non-relapse mortality (4.2% vs . 14.9%, P  = 0.001) than those with ≤ 2 courses of consolidation chemotherapy. Pre-transplantation minimal residual disease-negative patients with AML in CR1 who received MSDT with ≥ 3 courses of consolidation chemotherapy had a higher probability of LFS (85.9% vs . 67.7%, P  = 0.003) and a lower cumulative incidence of relapse (9.6% vs . 23.3%, P  = 0.013) than those with ≤ 2 courses.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that patients with AML in CR1 who received MSDT might benefit from pre-transplant consolidation chemotherapy.

Paradigm Shift in the Management of Acute Myeloid Leukemia-Approved Options in 2023

The word Leukemia was coined nearly 200 years ago by Rudolf Virchow. Once a death sentence, Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is now a treatable condition. The introduction of "7 + 3" chemotherapy, originally reported from the Roswell Park Memorial institute in Buffalo, New York, in 1973, changed the treatment paradigm for AML. About twenty-seven years later, FDA approved the first targeted agent, gemtuzumab, to be added to this backbone. During the last seven years, we have had ten new drugs approved for the management of patients with AML. Work by many dedicated scientists led to AML achieving the elite status of being the first cancer to have the whole genome sequenced using next-generation sequencing. In the year 2022, we witnessed the introduction of new classification systems for AML by the international consensus classification and the world health organization, both emphasizing molecular classification of the disease. In addition, the introduction of agents such as venetoclax and targeted therapies have changed the treatment paradigm in older patients ineligible for intensive therapy. In this review, we cover the rationale and evidence behind these regimens and provide insights into the newer agents.

NK cell defects: implication in acute myeloid leukemia

Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is a complex disease with rapid progression and poor/unsatisfactory outcomes. In the past few years, the focus has been on developing newer therapies for AML; however, relapse remains a significant problem. Natural Killer cells have strong anti-tumor potential against AML. This NK-mediated cytotoxicity is often restricted by cellular defects caused by disease-associated mechanisms, which can lead to disease progression. A stark feature of AML is the low/no expression of the cognate HLA ligands for the activating KIR receptors, due to which these tumor cells evade NK-mediated lysis. Recently, different Natural Killer cell therapies have been implicated in treating AML, such as the adoptive NK cell transfer, Chimeric antigen receptor-modified NK (CAR-NK) cell therapy, antibodies, cytokine, and drug treatment. However, the data available is scarce, and the outcomes vary between different transplant settings and different types of leukemia. Moreover, remission achieved by some of these therapies is only for a short time. In this mini-review, we will discuss the role of NK cell defects in AML progression, particularly the expression of different cell surface markers, the available NK cell therapies, and the results from various preclinical and clinical trials.

Survival improvement of patients with FLT3 mutated acute myeloid leukemia: results from a prospective 9 years cohort

Midostaurin added to intensive chemotherapy is the standard of care for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with FLT3 mutations (FLT3mut). We analyzed the impact of midostaurin in 227 FLT3mut-AML patients included in the AML-12 prospective trial for fit patients ≤70 years (#NCT04687098). Patients were divided into an early (2012-2015) and late (2016-2020) cohorts. They were uniformly treated except for the addition of midostaurin in 71% of late group patients. No differences were observed in response rates or the number of allotransplants between groups. Outcome was improved in the late period: 2-year relapse incidence decreased from 42% vs 29% in early vs late group (p = 0.024) and 2-year overall survival (OS) improved from 47% vs 61% (p = 0.042), respectively. The effect of midostaurin was evident in NPM1mut patients (n = 151), with 2-yr OS of 72% (exposed) vs 50% (naive) patients (p = 0.011) and mitigated FLT3-ITD allelic ratio prognostic value: 2-yr OS with midostaurin was 85% and 58% in low and high ratio patients (p = 0.049) vs 67% and 39% in naive patients (p = 0.005). In the wild-type NPM1 subset (n = 75), we did not observe significant differences between both study periods. In conclusion, this study highlights the improved outcome of FLT3mut AML fit patients with the incorporation of midostaurin.

Prediction of survival with lower intensity therapy among older patients with acute myeloid leukemia

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to develop a prognostic model for survival in older/unfit patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who were treated with lower-intensity chemotherapy regimens.

METHODS

The authors reviewed all older/unfit patients with newly diagnosed AML who received lower-intensity chemotherapy from 2000 until 2020 at their institution. A total of 1462 patients were included. They were divided (3:1 basis) into a training (n = 1088) and a validation group (n = 374).

RESULTS

In the training cohort of 1088 patients (median age, 72 years), the multivariate analysis identified 11 consistent independent adverse factors associated with survival: older age, therapy-related myeloid neoplasm, existence of previous myelodysplastic syndrome or myeloproliferative neoplasms, poor performance status, pulmonary comorbidity, anemia, thrombocytopenia, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, cytogenetic abnormalities, and the presence of infection at diagnosis, and therapy not containing venetoclax. The 3-year survival rates were 52%, 24%, 10%, and 1% in favorable, intermediate, poor, and very poor risk, respectively. This survival model was validated in an independent cohort. In a subset of patients in whom molecular mutation profiles were performed in more recent times, adding the mutation profiles after accounting for the effects of previous factors identified IDH2 (favorable), NPM1 (favorable), and TP53 (unfavorable) mutations as molecular prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

The proposed survival model with lower-intensity chemotherapy in older/unfit patients with newly diagnosed AML may help to advise patients on their expected outcome, to propose different strategies in first complete remission, and to compare the results of different existing or future investigational therapies.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Lower intensity therapy can be considered for older patients to avoid severe toxicities and adverse events. However, survival prediction in AML was commonly developed in patients who received intensive chemotherapy. In this study, we have proposed a survival model to guide therapeutic approach in older patients who received lower-intensity therapy.

A phase II study of combination daunorubicin, cytarabine (Ara-c), and nilotinib (TAsigna) (DATA) in patients newly diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia with KIT expression

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a challenging cancer in terms of achieving and maintaining long-duration remissions. Many novel therapies have been added to the standard regimen (combining cytarabine and anthracycline "7 + 3") to achieve such goals. Nilotinib is an oral multikinase inhibitor that is active against KIT tyrosine kinase, an important stem cell target. In this trial, we combined nilotinib with 7 + 3 induction (daunorubicin 60 mg/m2), high-dose cytarabine consolidation, and subsequently, if the patient was a candidate, for 2 years' maintenance therapy in patients with AML and KIT (CD117) expression. Patients were allowed to proceed to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) if deemed necessary. Our primary goal was increased complete remission rate with this combination. Thirty-four patients (with a median age 58.5 years) were enrolled on a single-arm phase II bi-institutional study; 21 (62%) patients achieved remission. The complete remission rate was 78% in evaluable patients. Thirteen of 34 (38%) patients had allogeneic HCT, all thirteen of which are still alive (100%). Common (>20%) grade 3 non-hematological toxicities included febrile neutropenia, hypophosphatemia, elevated liver enzymes, and hypertension. Only one patient (3%) died in induction due to liver failure, which was thought secondary to daunorubicin. Our current study reveals good outcomes in patients who received HCT and may warrant a larger study to confirm our findings in that specific population.

Different treatment strategies versus a common standard arm (CSA) in patients with newly diagnosed AML over the age of 60 years: a randomized German inter-group study

A randomized inter-group trial comparing more intensive treatment strategies to a common standard arm 3 + 7 (CSA) was conducted in patients with non-M3 AML. Untreated patients ≥ 60 years were allocated to the CSA (n = 132) or to the study group arms (n = 1154) of the AMLCG (TAD/HAM versus HAM/HAM ± G-CSF followed by TAD and maintenance) and the OSHO (intermediate-dose ara-C/mitoxantrone followed by ara-C/mitoxantrone). Median age of the 1147 eligible patients was 69 (range 60-87) years. CR/CRi status at 90 days was not significantly different between the CSA (54% (95%CI: 45-64)) and the study group arms (53% (95%CI: 47-60) and 59% (95%CI: 58-63)). The five-year event-free survival (EFS) probability (primary endpoint) was 6.2% (95%CI: 2.7-14.0) in the CSA, 7.6% (95%CI: 4.5-12.8) in study group A and 11.1% (95%CI: 9.0-13.7) in B. The 5-year OS was 17.2% (95%CI: 11.0-26.9), 17.0% (95%CI: 2.0-23.9), and 19.5% (95%CI: 16.7-22.8) in CSA, study group A and B, respectively. Neither study group differed significantly from the CSA regarding EFS, OS, or relapse-free survival. In multivariate analyses, allocation to the treatment strategy was not significantly associated with the time-to-event endpoints. The evaluation of more intensive treatment strategies did not show clinically relevant outcome differences when compared to CSA.

The increasingly blurred line between induction, consolidation and maintenance in acute myeloid leukaemia

Since the early 1970s, the treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) has undergone a major transformation. Initially based on only two drugs, an anthracycline and cytosine arabinoside, the aim of therapy was to achieve a haematological response allowing patients to recover and go home. Back in those early days, cure was not a realistic expectation. Treatment was analogous to a heart attack; upon recovery and a short respite, recurrence and death inevitably followed. Over the subsequent decades, slow but remarkable progress was made such that a subgroup of young adults could become long-term survivors. This astonishing feat was achieved initially without the use of new drugs. Supportive care played a major role with the widespread availability of platelet transfusions and improved antimicrobial therapy, particularly antifungal. No less important was the better use of existing drugs and the development of allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation. While initially the focus was on maximal tolerated therapy, an understanding of the immunologic role of allogeneic transplantation, better genetic characterization of the biology of the disease, advanced tools for detection of minimal disease as well as the recent development of new drugs changed the focus to a more refined approach targeting patients who are more likely to respond. Clearly, the historical paradigm where the term AML was generic and applicable to all patients requires a rethinking from the traditional therapeutic demarcations of therapy into phases of induction, consolidation and maintenance. These evolving new concepts and paradigm will be herein considered.

N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide is a prognostic marker for response to intensive chemotherapy, early death, and overall survival in acute myeloid leukemia

Patient-related factors are of prognostic importance in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Likewise, cardiac disorders may limit the tolerance of intensive therapy. Little is known about the prognostic value of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). We analyzed NT-proBNP levels at diagnosis in 312 AML patients (median age: 61 years; range 17-89 years) treated with 3 + 7-based induction-chemotherapy and consolidation with up to four cycles of intermediate or high-dose ARA-C. NT-proBNP levels were elevated in 199 patients (63.8%), normal (0-125 pg/ml) in 113 (36.2%), and highly elevated (>2000 pg/ml) in 20 patients (6.4%). Median NT-proBNP levels differed significantly among patients with complete remission (153.3 pg/ml), no remission (225.9 pg/ml), or early death (735.5 pg/ml) (p = .002). In multivariate analysis, NT-proBNP, age, and the 2009 European LeukemiaNet (ELN-2009) classification were independent predictors of outcome after induction chemotherapy. Overall survival (OS) differed significantly between patients with normal, moderately elevated, and highly elevated NT-proBNP (p < .001). These differences were observed in all patients and in patients <60 years but not in those ≥60 years. In multivariate analysis, NT-proBNP, age, and ELN-2009 remained independent prognostic variables for OS (p < .01). Together, NT-proBNP is an independent prognostic factor indicating the risk of induction failure, early death, and reduced OS in patients with AML.

High-dose cytarabine monotherapy is superior to standard-dose cytarabine- based multiagent sequential treatment cycle for consolidation treatment in adult (14-59 years) AML patients according to European Leukemia Net 2022 risk stratification

Introduction

We firstly investigate based on 2022 European Leukemia Net (ELN) risk stratification, whether standard-dose cytarabine based multiagent sequential chemotherapy (SDMSC) is more beneficial than high-dose cytarabine (HDAC) monotherapy in consolidation for the survival of adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients.

Methods

One hundred and eighty-three AML patients with complete remission (CR) were evaluated.

Results and discussion

The 3-year relapse rate was 33.4% in the HDAC group and 50.5% in the SDMSC group (p=0.066). The 3-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) rates in the HDAC group (69.2%, 60.7%) were significantly higher than that in the SDMSC group (50.8%, 42.1%) (p=0.025, 0.019). For patients in the intermediate risk group, the 3-year OS and EFS rates in the HDAC group (72.5%, 56.7%) were higher than that in the SDMSC group (49.1%, 38.0%) (p=0.028, 0.093). This study indicates that for young adult AML patients, HDAC consolidation achieves a higher long-term survival than SDMSC, especially for patients in the intermediate-risk group according to the 2022 ELN risk stratification.

Meta-hallmarks of aging and cancer

Both aging and cancer are characterized by a series of partially overlapping "hallmarks" that we subject here to a meta-analysis. Several hallmarks of aging (i.e., genomic instability, epigenetic alterations, chronic inflammation, and dysbiosis) are very similar to specific cancer hallmarks and hence constitute common "meta-hallmarks," while other features of aging (i.e., telomere attrition and stem cell exhaustion) act likely to suppress oncogenesis and hence can be viewed as preponderantly "antagonistic hallmarks." Disabled macroautophagy and cellular senescence are two hallmarks of aging that exert context-dependent oncosuppressive and pro-tumorigenic effects. Similarly, the equivalence or antagonism between aging-associated deregulated nutrient-sensing and cancer-relevant alterations of cellular metabolism is complex. The agonistic and antagonistic relationship between the processes that drive aging and cancer has bearings for the age-related increase and oldest age-related decrease of cancer morbidity and mortality, as well as for the therapeutic management of malignant disease in the elderly.

Targeting SAMHD1 with hydroxyurea in first-line cytarabine-based therapy of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia: Results from the HEAT-AML trial

BACKGROUND

Treatment of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is based on combination chemotherapy with cytarabine (ara-C) and anthracyclines. Five-year overall survival is below 30%, which has partly been attributed to cytarabine resistance. Preclinical data suggest that the addition of hydroxyurea potentiates cytarabine efficacy by increasing ara-C triphosphate (ara-CTP) levels through targeted inhibition of SAMHD1.

OBJECTIVES

In this phase 1 trial, we evaluated the feasibility, safety and efficacy of the addition of hydroxyurea to standard chemotherapy with cytarabine/daunorubicin in newly diagnosed AML patients.

METHODS

Nine patients were enrolled and received at least two courses of ara-C (1 g/m² /2 h b.i.d. d1-5, i.e., a total of 10 g/m² per course), hydroxyurea (1-2 g d1-5) and daunorubicin (60 mg/m² d1-3). The primary endpoint was safety; secondary endpoints were complete remission rate and measurable residual disease (MRD). Additionally, pharmacokinetic studies of ara-CTP and ex vivo drug sensitivity assays were performed.

RESULTS

The most common grade 3-4 toxicity was febrile neutropenia (100%). No unexpected toxicities were observed. Pharmacokinetic analyses showed a significant increase in median ara-CTP levels (1.5-fold; p = 0.04) in patients receiving doses of 1 g hydroxyurea. Ex vivo, diagnostic leukaemic bone marrow blasts from study patients were significantly sensitised to ara-C by a median factor of 2.1 (p = 0.0047). All nine patients (100%) achieved complete remission, and all eight (100%) with validated MRD measurements (flow cytometry or real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction [RT-qPCR]) had an MRD level <0.1% after two cycles of chemotherapy. Treatment was well-tolerated, and median time to neutrophil recovery >1.0 × 10⁹ /L and to platelet recovery >50 × 10⁹ /L after the start of cycle 1 was 19 days and 22 days, respectively. Six of nine patients underwent allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). With a median follow-up of 18.0 (range 14.9-20.5) months, one patient with adverse risk not fit for HSCT experienced a relapse after 11.9 months but is now in second complete remission.

CONCLUSION

Targeted inhibition of SAMHD1 by the addition of hydroxyurea to conventional AML therapy is safe and appears efficacious within the limitations of the small phase 1 patient cohort. These results need to be corroborated in a larger study.

The Impact of Inflammation-Induced Tumor Plasticity during Myeloid Transformation

Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) is an aging-associated condition characterized by the clonal outgrowth of mutated preleukemic cells. Individuals with CH are at an increased risk of developing hematopoietic malignancies. Here, we describe a novel animal model carrying a recurrent TET2 missense mutation frequently found in patients with CH and leukemia. In a fashion similar to CH, animals show signs of disease late in life when they develop a wide range of myeloid neoplasms, including acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Using single-cell transcriptomic profiling of the bone marrow, we show that disease progression in aged animals correlates with an enhanced inflammatory response and the emergence of an aberrant inflammatory monocytic cell population. The gene signature characteristic of this inflammatory population is associated with poor prognosis in patients with AML. Our study illustrates an example of collaboration between a genetic lesion found in CH and inflammation, leading to transformation and the establishment of blood neoplasms.

SIGNIFICANCE

Progression from a preleukemic state to transformation, in the presence of TET2 mutations, is coupled with the emergence of inflammation and a novel population of inflammatory monocytes. Genes characteristic of this inflammatory population are associated with the worst prognosis in patients with AML. These studies connect inflammation to progression to leukemia. See related commentary by Pietras and DeGregori, p. 2234 . This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 2221.

CPX-351 Yields Similar Response and Survival Outcome in Younger and Older Patients With Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia

BACKGROUND

CPX-351 was approved by the FDA in 2017 as frontline induction chemotherapy for patients aged ≥18 years with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) which includes myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) and therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML). The efficacy of CPX-351 among younger patients (aged <60 years) is currently unclear, as the large, randomized phase 3 study that led to approval of CPX-351 only included patients between the ages of 60 and 75 years.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of clinical and molecular data from adult patients with newly diagnosed AML-MRC or t-AML treated with CPX-351. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: aged <60 years (cohort A) and aged ≥60 years (cohort B). We compared overall response rate (ORR) and median overall survival (mOS) between the cohorts.

RESULTS

Of 169 evaluable patients, 21.3% were in cohort A and 78.7% were in cohort B. ORR of the entire cohort was 53.3%; ORR of cohort A was 47.2% compared with 54.9% for cohort B (P = .46). Overall, 54.4% of responding patients proceeded to allogenic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT), including 52.9% of patients in cohort A and 54.8% in cohort B (P = 1.00). At a median follow-up of 24 months, mOS of the entire cohort was 16 months and was similar between cohorts A and B (18 vs. 15 months, respectively; P = .29).

CONCLUSION

CPX-351 resulted in similar response rates and survival outcomes among both younger and older adult patients with newly diagnosed AML-MRC or t-AML.

Intensified cytarabine dose during consolidation in adult AML patients under 65 years is not associated with survival benefit: real-world data from the German SAL-AML registry

PURPOSE

Higher doses of cytarabine appear to improve long-term outcome in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), in particular for younger patients. To this end, the optimal dosage of single-agent cytarabine in consolidation therapy remains elusive. Here, we assessed the impact of different dosages of cytarabine consolidation after 7 + 3 induction on outcome in a large real-world data set from the German Study Alliance Leukemia-Acute Myeloid Leukemia (SAL-AML) registry.

METHODS

Patients between 18 and 64 years of age, registered between April 2005 and September 2020, who attained complete remission after intensive induction and received at least one consolidation cycle with intermediate (IDAC) or high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC) were selected. To account for differences in patient and disease characteristics between both groups, the average treatment effect was estimated by propensity score weighting.

RESULTS

Six-hundred-forty-two patients received HiDAC consolidation with median dosage of 17.6 (IQR (interquartile range), 16.5-18.0) g/m² for a median number of 3 cycles (IQR, 2-3), whereas 178 patients received IDAC consolidation with 5.9 (IQR, 5.7-8.6) g/m² for a median of 2 cycles (IQR, 1-3). Both groups differed significantly in some important characteristics (age, sex, cytogenetic risk group, ECOG performance status, disease status, HCT-CI, number of induction cycles). After propensity score weighting for differences in patient and disease characteristics, relapse-free survival after 2 years was comparable between HiDAC-treated (55.3%) and IDAC-treated (55.6%) patients (HR = 0.935, p = 0.69). Moreover, no significant differences in overall survival were observed after 2 years (84.7 vs. 80.6%, HR = 1.101, p = 0.65). Notably, more patients treated with IDAC received allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in first remission (37.6 vs. 19.8%, p < 0.001). Censoring for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in first remission revealed no significant survival difference with regard to cytarabine dosage. Considering only of European LeukemiaNet (ELN) favorable-risk AML patients, there was no significant difference in outcome. Of note, significantly more patients treated with HiDAC suffered from ≥ 3 CTCAE infectious complications (56.7 [95%-CI 52.8-60.6%] vs. 44.1% [95%-CI 36.6-51.7%]; p = 0,004). The rate of other ≥ 3 CTCAE non-hematological toxicities and secondary malignancies was comparable in both treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective analysis suggests no significant benefit of high-dose cytarabine compared to intermediate dosages in consolidation for AML patients under 65 years of age, independent of ELN risk group.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03188874.

A Focus on Intermediate-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Sub-Classification Updates and Therapeutic Challenges

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) represents a heterogeneous group of hematopoietic neoplasms deriving from the abnormal proliferation of myeloid progenitors in the bone marrow. Patients with AML may have highly variable outcomes, which are generally dictated by individual clinical and genomic characteristics. As such, the European LeukemiaNet 2017 and 2022 guidelines categorize newly diagnosed AML into favorable-, intermediate-, and adverse-risk groups, based on their molecular and cytogenetic profiles. Nevertheless, the intermediate-risk category remains poorly defined, as many patients fall into this group as a result of their exclusion from the other two. Moreover, further genomic data with potential prognostic and therapeutic influences continue to emerge, though they are yet to be integrated into the diagnostic and prognostic models of AML. This review highlights the latest therapeutic advances and challenges that warrant refining the prognostic classification of intermediate-risk AML.

Design of the VIALE-M phase III trial of venetoclax and oral azacitidine maintenance therapy in acute myeloid leukemia

Prevention of relapse is a major therapeutic challenge and an unmet need for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Venetoclax is a highly selective, potent, oral BCL-2 inhibitor that induces apoptosis in AML cells. When combined with azacitidine, it leads to prolonged overall survival and rapid, durable remissions in treatment-naive AML patients ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. VIALE-M is a randomized, double-blind, two-arm study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of venetoclax in combination with oral azacitidine (CC-486) as maintenance therapy in patients in complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery after intensive induction and consolidation therapies. The primary end point is relapse-free survival. Secondary outcomes include overall survival, minimal residual disease conversion and improvement in quality-of-life.

Trial registration number: NCT04102020 ( ClinicalTrials.gov )

FDA Approval Summary: Oral Azacitidine for Continued Treatment of Adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Unable to Complete Intensive Curative Therapy

On September 1, 2020, the FDA granted approval for oral azacitidine (Onureg, CC-486) for continued treatment of adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who achieved complete remission (CR) or complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) following intensive induction chemotherapy and who are not able to complete intensive curative therapy. Approval was based on improvement in overall survival using CC-486 300 mg daily in a 2 weeks on/2 weeks off schedule in comparison with placebo (HR, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.86; P = 0.0009) in the randomized trial CC-486-AML-001 (QUAZAR) in adults ≥ 55 years old with AML in CR/CRi who did not complete standard intensive induction and postremission therapy. Of note, the study was not designed to test CC-486 as maintenance after standard postremission therapy or as an alternative to standard postremission therapy. Gastrointestinal toxicities, fatigue, and pneumonia were more common in patients treated with CC-486 compared with placebo. Additional studies are needed to establish safe dosing for patients with hepatic impairment. The pharmacokinetic parameters, recommended dose, and recommended schedule of CC-486 differ substantially from those of other azacitidine formulations; therefore, inappropriate substitutions between formulations pose a considerable risk for harm.

Prediction of survival with intensive chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia

Progress with intensive chemotherapy and supportive care measures has improved survival in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Predicting outcome helps in treatment decision making. We analyzed survival as the treatment endpoint in 3728 patients with newly diagnosed AML treated with intensive chemotherapy from 1980 to 2021. We divided the total study group (3:1 basis) into a training (n = 2790) and a validation group (n = 938). The associations between survival and 27 characteristics were investigated. In the training cohort, the multivariate analysis identified 12 consistent adverse prognostic variables independently associated with worse survival: older age, therapy-related myeloid neoplasm, worse performance status, cardiac comorbidity, leukocytosis, anemia, thrombocytopenia, elevated creatinine and lactate dehydrogenase, cytogenetic abnormalities, and the presence of infection at diagnosis except fever of unknown origin. We categorized patients into four prognostic groups, favorable (7%), intermediate (43%), poor (39%), and very poor (11%) with estimated 5-year survival rates of 69%, 36%, 13%, and 3% respectively (p < .001). The predictive model was validated in an independent cohort. In a subset of patients with molecular mutation profiles, adding the mutation profiles after accounting for the effects of previous factors identified NPM1 (favorable), PTPN11, and TP53 (both unfavorable) mutations as molecular prognostic factors. The new proposed predictive model for survival with intensive chemotherapy in patients with AML is robust and can be used to advise patients regarding their prognosis, to modify therapy in remission (e.g., proposing allogeneic stem cell transplantation in first remission), and to compare outcome and benefits on future investigational therapies.

Solute Carrier Nucleoside Transporters in Hematopoiesis and Hematological Drug Toxicities: A Perspective

Simple Summary

Anticancer nucleoside analogs are promising treatments that often result in damaging toxicities and therefore ineffective treatment. Mechanisms of this are not well-researched, but cellular nucleoside transport research in mice might provide additional insight given transport’s role in mammalian hematopoiesis. Cellular nucleoside transport is a notable component of mammalian hematopoiesis due to how mutations within it relate to hematological abnormities. This review encompasses nucleoside transporters, focusing on their inherent properties, hematopoietic role, and their interplay in nucleoside drug treatment side effects. We then propose potential mechanisms to explain nucleoside transport involvement in blood disorders. Finally, we point out and advocate for future research areas that would improve therapeutic outcomes for patients taking nucleoside analog therapies.

Abstract

Anticancer nucleoside analogs produce adverse, and at times, dose-limiting hematological toxicities that can compromise treatment efficacy, yet the mechanisms of such toxicities are poorly understood. Recently, cellular nucleoside transport has been implicated in normal blood cell formation with studies from nucleoside transporter-deficient mice providing additional insights into the regulation of mammalian hematopoiesis. Furthermore, several idiopathic human genetic disorders have revealed nucleoside transport as an important component of mammalian hematopoiesis because mutations in individual nucleoside transporter genes are linked to various hematological abnormalities, including anemia. Here, we review recent developments in nucleoside transporters, including their transport characteristics, their role in the regulation of hematopoiesis, and their potential involvement in the occurrence of adverse hematological side effects due to nucleoside drug treatment. Furthermore, we discuss the putative mechanisms by which aberrant nucleoside transport may contribute to hematological abnormalities and identify the knowledge gaps where future research may positively impact treatment outcomes for patients undergoing various nucleoside analog therapies.

Comparison of Three Doses of Cytarabine Consolidation for Intermediate- and Adverse-risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Real World Evidence From Thai Acute Myeloid Leukemia Registry

BACKGROUND

Intermediate or high doses of cytarabine (IDAC or HiDAC) were recommended as postremission chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This retrospective study investigated the real-world outcomes of 3-different cytarabine doses from the multicenter Thai AML registry database.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The intermediate- and adverse-risk AML patients (N = 258) who achieved complete remission and proceeded to single-agent cytarabine consolidation were enrolled.

RESULTS

The median relapse-free survival (RFS) using IDAC 1.5 g/m², high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC) 2 g/m², and HiDAC 3 g/m² were 12.6, 11.7, and 13 months, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) using IDAC 1.5 g/m², HiDAC 2 g/m², and HiDAC 3 g/m² were 34.9, 22.7, and 23.7 months, respectively. No significant difference in RFS and OS was detected between the 3 doses. Secondary AML, white blood cell > 100×10⁹/L and the adverse-risk AML were independent prognostic factors for inferior survival (P= .008, P < .001, P= .014). Patients who completed 3 to 4 cycles of consolidation had significantly superior RFS and OS (P< .001, P< .001). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 72.9% of IDAC, 73.8% of HiDAC 2 g/m², and 78.1% of HiDAC 3 g/m² without statistical significance. However, the incidence of septic shock was significantly higher after HiDAC 3 g/m² compared to IDAC regimen (8% vs. 3%, P= .037).

CONCLUSION

IDAC is an appropriate regimen for postremission chemotherapy for intermediate- and adverse-risk AML. The higher dosing levels may not produce any benefits to patients and may increase incidence of septic shock. The number of consolidation cycles may impact on survivals rather than the intensity of cytarabine.

Antineoplastic activity of biogenic silver and gold nanoparticles to combat leukemia: Beginning a new era in cancer theragnostic

The American Cancer Society estimated around 61,090 new cases of leukemia were diagnosed, and around 23,660 people died from this disease in the United States alone in 2021. Due to its burden on society, there is an unmet need to explore innovative approaches to overcome leukemia. Among different strategies that have been explored, nanotechnology appears to be a promising and effective approach for therapeutics. Specifically, biogenic silver and gold nanoparticles (NPs) have attracted significant attention for their antineoplastic activity toward leukemia cancer cells due to their unique physicochemical properties. Indeed, these nanostructures have emerged as useful approaches in anti-leukemic applications, either as carriers to enhance drug bioavailability and its targeted delivery to a specific organ or as a novel therapeutic agent. This review explores recent advances in green synthesized nanomaterials and their potential use against leukemia, especially focusing on silver (Ag) and gold (Au) nanostructures. In detail, we have reviewed various eco-friendly methods of bio-synthesized NPs, their analytical properties, and toxicity effects against leukemic models. This overview confirms the satisfactory potency of biogenic NPs toward leukemic cells and desirable safety profiles against human native cells, which opens a promising door toward commercializing these types of nontherapeutic agents if challenges involve clinical validations, reproducibility, and scalability could be resolved.

Oncology stewardship in acute myeloid leukemia

In recent years, an explosion of novel agents has shifted the treatment paradigm for patients with acute myeloid leukemia. The optimal place in therapy for many of these novel agents remains unknown due to limited guidance from national guidelines and the way these agents were studied prior to entering the market. A critical evaluation of the literature and incorporation of oncology stewardship principles can be helpful in determining an optimal place for these agents while being mindful of the overall cost that is associated with therapies. The purpose of this review is to critically evaluate the efficacy and safety data for five controversial agents and provide examples of the use of stewardship practices in determining their place in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia.

Relapse surveillance of acute myeloid leukemia patients in first remission after consolidation chemotherapy: diagnostic value of regular bone marrow aspirations

The optimal follow-up care for relapse detection in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients in first remission after consolidation therapy with intensive chemotherapy is not established. In this retrospective study, we evaluate the diagnostic value of an intensive relapse surveillance strategy by regular bone marrow aspirations (BMA) in these patients. We identified 86 patients with newly diagnosed non-promyelocytic AML who had reached complete remission (CR) after intensive induction and consolidation chemotherapy between 2007 and 2019. Annual relapse rates were 40%, 17%, and 2% in years 1-3, respectively. Patients in CR were surveilled by BMA scheduled every 3 months for 2 years, followed by BMA every 6 months. This surveillance regimen detected 29 of 55 relapses (53%), 11 of which were molecular relapses (20%). The remaining 26 of 55 relapses (47%) were diagnosed by non-surveillance BMA prompted by specific suspicion of relapse. Most patients showed concurrent morphological abnormalities in peripheral blood (PB) at time of relapse. Seven percent of all morphological relapses occurred without simultaneous PB abnormalities and would have been delayed without surveillance BMA. Intensified monthly PB assessment paired with BMA every 3 months during the first 2 years may be a highly sensitive relapse surveillance strategy.

Venetoclax combined with FLAG-IDA induction and consolidation in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia

Multi-agent induction chemotherapy (IC) improves response rates in younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML); however, relapse remains the principal cause of treatment failure. Improved induction regimens are needed. A prospective single-center phase Ib/II study evaluating fludarabine, cytarabine, G-CSF, and idarubicin combined with venetoclax (FLAG-IDA + VEN) in patients with newly diagnosed (ND) or relapsed/refractory AML. The primary efficacy endpoint was assessment of overall activity (overall response rate [ORR]: complete remission [CR] + CR with partial hematologic recovery [CRh] + CR with incomplete hematologic recovery [CRi] + morphologic leukemia free state + partial response). Secondary objectives included additional assessments of efficacy, overall survival (OS), and event-free survival (EFS). Results of the expanded ND cohort with additional follow-up are reported. Forty-five patients (median age: 44 years [range 20-65]) enrolled. ORR was 98% (N = 44/45; 95% credible interval 89.9%-99.7%). Eighty-nine percent (N = 40/45) of patients attained a composite CR (CRc + CRh + CRi) including 93% (N = 37/40) who were measurable residual disease (MRD) negative. Twenty-seven (60%) patients transitioned to allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT). Common non-hematologic adverse events included febrile neutropenia (44%; N = 20), pneumonia (22%, N = 10), bacteremia (18%, N = 8), and skin/soft tissue infections (44%, N = 20). After a median follow-up of 20 months, median EFS and OS were not reached. Estimated 24-month EFS and OS were 64% and 76%, respectively. FLAG-IDA + VEN is an active regimen in ND-AML capable of producing high MRD-negative remission rates and enabling transition to alloHSCT when appropriate in most patients. Toxicities were as expected with IC and were manageable. Estimated 24-month survival appears favorable compared to historical IC benchmarks.

The Nuclear Proteins TP73 and CUL4A Confer Resistance to Cytarabine by Induction of Translesion DNA Synthesis via Mono-ubiquitination of PCNA

Resistance to cytarabine is a key problem in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). To understand the molecular biology of resistance to cytarabine, a viability-based chemosensitizer screen was utilized. We screened synthetic lethal targets using 437 different small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) directed against factors involved in DNA repair mechanisms and cytarabine as the chemical compound. Three hits were identified: CUL4A, TP73, and RFC2. We show here that the ubiquitin ligase CULLIN 4A (CUL4A) and the tumor-suppressive transcription factor p73 contribute to drug resistance by modulating DNA damage response. P73 confers resistance to cytarabine therapy by transactivation of REV3L, encoding the catalytic subunit of translesion DNA polymerase ζ, and CUL4A probably by influencing proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and the polymerase switch towards error-prone translesion DNA polymerases. Abrogation of the polymerase ζ by siRNA causes identical effects as siRNAs against CUL4A or TP73 and resensitizes cells towards cytarabine therapy in vitro. As CUL4A needs to be activated by neddylation to facilitate the degradation of several proteins including PCNA, we propose a novel explanation for the synergism between cytarabine and the neddylation inhibitor pevonedistat by inhibition of translesion synthesis. In keeping with this, in AML patients treated with cytarabine, we found high expression of CUL4A and TP73 to be associated with poor prognosis.

Venetoclax combined with induction chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia: a post-hoc, propensity score-matched, cohort study

BACKGROUND

Venetoclax combined with intensive chemotherapy has been shown to be safe with promising activity in fit patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia. The aim of this study was to compare the activity of venetoclax plus intensive chemotherapy with intensive chemotherapy alone.

METHODS

This was a post-hoc propensity score matched analysis of prospective clinical trials (NCT03214562, NCT02115295, and NCT01289457) in patients at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Texas, USA between March 29, 2010, and June 15, 2021. Eligible patients were aged 18 years and older, and had newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome, and were treated within trials incorporating purine analogues with an anthracycline and cytarabine either with venetoclax plus intensive chemotherapy or with intensive chemotherapy alone. Patients in the venetoclax plus intensive chemotherapy cohort were matched with patients in the intensive chemotherapy cohort. Morphological response and measurable residual disease (MRD) was assessed using bone marrow aspiration and biopsy and eight-colour multiparameter flow cytometry. The primary objectives were rate of MRD negative composite complete response and cumulative incidence of transition to allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). All patients who had response within two treatment cycles (induction and re-induction) were included in the analyses. Secondary objectives included assessment of event-free and overall survival.

FINDINGS

The propensity matched cohort included 279 patients (median age 49 years [IQR 39-57]; 131 [47%] were men and 148 [53%] were women); 85 in the venetoclax plus intensive chemotherapy cohort and 194 in the intensive chemotherapy cohort. After a median follow up of 30 months (95% CI 26-36), 64 (86%) of 74 patients in the venetoclax plus intensive chemotherapy cohort had an MRD-negative composite complete response rate compared with 86 [61%] of 140 patients in the intensive chemotherapy cohort (odd ratio 3·2 [95% CI 1·5-6·7]; p=0·0028). The overall cumulative incidence of allogeneic HSCT in responding patients was higher with venetoclax plus intensive chemotherapy than intensive chemotherapy (79% [95% CI 67-88] vs 57% [49-65]; hazard ratio [HR] 1·52 [95% CI 1·11-2·08]; p=0·012). Venetoclax plus intensive chemotherapy improved event-free survival (median not reached [NR; 95% CI NR-NR] vs 14·3 months [10·7-33·5]; HR 0·57 [95% CI 0·34-0·95]; p=0·030), but overall survival did not significantly differ between the two cohorts (median NR [95% CI 24-NR] vs 32 months [19-NR]; HR 0·63 [95% CI 0·35-1·1], p=0·13).

INTERPRETATIONS

Venetoclax combined with intensive induction chemotherapy induced deep MRD-negative remissions, allowing transition to allogeneic HSCT in first remission, and improvement in event-free survival. These results highlight the incremental benefit of venetoclax added to intensive induction chemotherapy across European LeukemiaNet risk groups, and serve as a benchmark to inform enrolment on future confirmatory prospective clinical trials.

FUNDING

None.

Neutropenia in the First Cycle of Consolidation Chemotherapy with High-Dose Cytarabine Is Not Associated with the Incidence of Relapse in Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients in First Complete Remission

BACKGROUND

It has been reported that prolonged neutropenia during post-remission chemotherapy is associated with a reduced risk of disease relapse in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of adult AML patients in first complete remission (CR1) who underwent consolidation chemotherapy with high-dose cytarabine. Those receiving allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in CR1 were excluded. We calculated the D-index, which is an area-based neutropenia index. The patients were divided into 2 groups using the median value of the D-index during the first cycle of consolidation chemotherapy (C#1).

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients were included. The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 54.8% (95% confidence interval (CI): 37.5-73.8) in patients with a D-index < 5,118 and 62.0% (95%CI: 42.7-81.4) in those with a D-index ≥ 5,118 (P = 0.56). In a multivariate analysis, intermediate / adverse cytogenetic risk (HR 2.76), performance status ≥ 2 (HR 5.55) and 2 cycles of induction chemotherapy required to achieve CR1 (HR 4.29) were identified as significant factors associated with relapse. The D-index at C#1 did not have a significant impact.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to pediatric patients, the severity of neutropenia is not associated with a risk of disease relapse in adult AML patients.

Prediction of early (4-week) mortality in acute myeloid leukemia with intensive chemotherapy

The progress with intensive chemotherapy and supportive care measures has improved survival in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Given the recent development of effective low intensity therapies, an optimal decision on the therapy intensity may improve survival through the avoidance of early mortality. We reviewed the outcome of 3728 patients with newly diagnosed AML who received intensive chemotherapy between August 1980 and May 2020. Intensive chemotherapy was defined as a cumulative cytarabine dose ≥ 700 mg/m² during induction therapy. We divided the whole cohort into a training and validation group at a 3:1 ratio. The population was divided into a training (2790 patients) and a validation cohort (938 patients). The median age was 55 years (range, 15-99). Among them, 442 patients (12%) had core-binding factor AML. Binary logistic regression identified older age, worse performance status, hyperbilirubinemia, elevated creatinine, hyperuricemia, cytogenetic abnormalities other than CBF and -Y, and pneumonia as adverse prognostic factors for an early 4-week mortality. This risk classification for early mortality was verified in the validation cohort of patients. In the validation cohort of more recently treated patients from 2000 to 2017, the 4-week mortality rates with intensive chemotherapy were 2%, 14%, and 50% in the low-, high-, and very high-risk group, respectively. The mortality rates with low intensity therapies were 3%, 9%, and 20%, respectively. The risk classification guides treatment intensity by the assessment of age, frailty, organ dysfunction, cytogenetic abnormality, and infection to avoid early mortality.

Outcomes of HIDAC 18 g Versus IDAC 9 g in Consolidation Therapy of Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Cytarabine based therapy has been the standard consolidation regimen for AML (acute myeloid leukemia) for decades. However, the optimal dose, regimen and schedule is not known. HIDAC (high dose cytarabine at 18 g/m²) has been the conventional standard, however, recent studies have shown that intermediate doses of cytarabine (IDAC) have equal efficacy and lesser toxicities.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed 75 AML patients who entered consolidation out of 167 patients who underwent induction therapy between 2014 and 2018. HIDAC (at 18 g/m²) was given to 39 patients and 36 patients received IDAC at 9 g/m².

RESULTS

Median age was 28 years (range 2-60). Male: female ratio was 1.02. More courses were administered in out-patient setting in IDAC group 61% (n = 58/95 courses) than in HIDAC 29% (n = 29/101 courses); p < 0.001. Incidence of clinically documented infection (CDI) was higher in HIDAC group (23.7%) compared to IDAC (8.4%), p = 0.004, and diarrhea showed a higher trend in the HIDAC group (9.9% vs. 3.1%; p = 0.052). Other toxicities were similar in both groups. There were 4 consolidation deaths in HIDAC whereas 3 deaths in IDAC group (p = 0.775). Median OS was 19.7 vs. 16.2 months and 3 years OS was 49.1% vs. 34.7% in HIDAC and IDAC groups respectively (p = 0.570). Median LFS was 12.6 versus 11.8 months; 3 years LFS was 46.4% versus 31% in HIDAC and IDAC groups respectively (p = 0.278).

CONCLUSION

For AML consolidation IDAC had lesser toxicity when compared with HIDAC though comparable efficacy needs to be confirmed with longer follow up and with prospective studies.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12288-021-01430-z.

Changing trends in the therapy of acute myeloid leukemia

There has been remarkable progress in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) which has spanned 5 decades. The changing trends have led to new approaches and significant improvement in outcomes. This review has summarized the historical insights that have shaped the current treatment paradigms of AML.

Is the current consolidation regimen for AML evidence-based?

Current standard of care for consolidation therapy for AML varies based on age and induction regimen, among other factors. Many trials have sought to determine the optimal dose, number of cycles, and schedule for consolidation with cytarabine. For AML patients under age 60, mid-dose cytarabine is as effective as high-dose cytarabine, results after 3 or 4 cycles of cytarabine in consolidation are comparable but are both superior to only one cycle, and giving cytarabine every 12 h on days 1, 2, and 3 appears to have the same benefit but less toxicity than cytarabine given on days 1, 3, and 5. For those over age 60, the best dose of cytarabine is unknown, but post-remission therapy appears to improve survival for some patients who achieve remission after standard induction, depending on induction regimen used and MRD status at time of remission.

Outcomes of intensification of induction chemotherapy for children with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia: A report from the Children's Oncology Group

BACKGROUND

High-risk pediatric acute myeloid leukemia confers a poor prognosis, and alternative strategies are needed to improve outcomes. We hypothesized that intensifying induction on the AAML1031 clinical trial would improve outcomes compared to the predecessor trial AAML0531.

METHODS

Patients on AAML0531 received cytarabine (1600 mg/m² )/daunorubicin (150 mg/m² )/etoposide (ADE) for induction II and patients on AAML1031 received mitoxantrone (48 mg/m² )/cytarabine (8000 mg/m² ) (MA). Stem cell transplant (SCT) conditioning included busulfan/cyclophosphamide on AAML0531, whereas AAML1031 used busulfan/fludarabine and liberalized donor eligibility. Patients were included in this analysis if they met high-risk criteria common to the two trials by cytogenics or poor disease response after induction I ADE.

RESULTS

MA provided no benefit over ADE at: induction II response (complete response [CR]: 64% vs. 62%, p = .87; measurable residual disease [MRD]+: 57% vs. 46%, p = .34); or intensification I response (CR: 79% vs. 94%, p = .27; MRD+: 27% vs. 20%, p = 1.0). When considered with altered SCT approach, MA did not improve 5-year disease-free survival (24% ± 9% vs. 18% ± 15%, p = .63) or 5-year overall survival (35% ± 10% vs. 38% ± 18%, p = .66). MA was associated with slower neutrophil recovery (median 34 vs. 27 days, p = .007) and platelet recovery (median 29 vs. 24.5 days, p = .04) and longer hospital stay (32 vs. 28 days, p = .01) during induction II.

CONCLUSION

Intensification of induction II did not improve treatment response or survival, but did increase toxicity and resource utilization. Alternative strategies are urgently needed to improve outcomes for pediatric patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (trials registered at clinicaltrials.gov NCT01371981, NCT00372593).