Nephrectomy and interleukin-2 for metastatic renal-cell carcinoma

Understanding and integrating cytoreductive nephrectomy with immune checkpoint inhibitors in the management of metastatic RCC

Cytoreductive nephrectomy became accepted as standard of care for selected patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) because of improved survival observed in patients treated with cytoreductive nephrectomy in combination with interferon-α in two randomized clinical trials published in 2001. Over the past two decades, novel systemic therapies have shown higher treatment response rates and improved survival outcomes compared with interferon-α. During this rapid evolution of mRCC treatments, systemic therapies have been the primary focus of clinical trials. Results from multiple retrospective studies continue to suggest an overall survival benefit for selected patients treated with nephrectomy in combination with systemic mRCC treatments, with the notable exception of one debated clinical trial. The optimal timing for surgery is unknown, and proper patient selection remains crucial to improving surgical outcomes. As systemic therapies continue to evolve, clinicians have an increasing need to understand how to incorporate cytoreductive nephrectomy into the management of mRCC.

The current role of cytoreductive nephrectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

The management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) continues to be a therapeutic challenge; however, the options for systemic therapy in this setting have exploded over the past 20 years. From the advent of toxic cytokine therapy to the subsequent discovery of targeted therapy (TT) and immune checkpoint inhibitors, the landscape of viable treatment options continues to progress. With the arrival of cytokine therapy, two randomized trials demonstrated a survival benefit for upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) plus interferon therapy and this approach became the standard for surgical candidates. However, it was difficult to establish the role and the timing of CN with the subsequent advent of TT, just a few years later. More recently, two randomized phase III studies completed in the TT era questioned the use of CN and brought to light the role of risk stratification while selecting patients for CN. Careful identification of the mRCC patients who are likely to have a rapid progression of the disease is essential, as these patients need prompt systemic therapy. With the continued advancement of systemic therapy using the immune checkpoint inhibitors as a first line therapy, the role of CN will continue to evolve.

Optimizing patient selection for cytoreductive nephrectomy based on outcomes in the contemporary era of systemic therapy

BACKGROUND

The management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has evolved rapidly, and results from the Cancer du Rein Metastatique Nephrectomie et Antiangiogéniques (CARMENA) trial bring into question the utility of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN). The objective of this study was to examine overall survival (OS) and identify risk factors associated with patients less likely to benefit from CN in the targeted therapy era.

METHODS

Patients with mRCC undergoing CN from 2005 to 2017 were identified. Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to assess OS and risk-stratify patients, respectively, on the basis of preoperative clinical and laboratory data.

RESULTS

Six hundred eight patients were eligible with a median follow-up of 29.4 months. Ninety-five percent of the patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status less than or equal to 1, and 70% had a single site of metastatic disease. In a multivariable analysis, risk factors significantly associated with decreased OS included systemic symptoms at diagnosis, retroperitoneal and supradiaphragmatic lymphadenopathy, bone metastasis, clinical T4 disease, a hemoglobin level less than the lower limit of normal (LLN), a serum albumin level less than the LLN, a serum lactate dehydrogenase level greater than the upper limit of normal, and a neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio greater than or equal to 4. Patients were stratified into 3 risk groups: low (fewer than 2 risk factors), intermediate (2-3 risk factors), and high (more than 3 risk factors). These groups had median OS of 58.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 44.3-66.6 months), 30.6 months (95% CI, 27.0-35.0 months), and 19.2 months (95% CI, 13.9-22.6 months), respectively (P < .0001). The median time to postoperative systemic therapy was 45 days (interquartile range, 30-90 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with more than 3 risk factors did not seem to benefit from CN. Importantly, OS in this group was equivalent to, if not higher than, OS for patients in the CN plus sunitinib arm of CARMENA, and this raises the possibility that a well-selected population might benefit from CN.

Redefining the Role of Surgical Management of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The treatment landscape for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) continues to evolve with ongoing advancements in systemic therapy, raising further questions about the optimal role of surgery in the management of mRCC. Herein, we provide a context and review of the recent evidence concerning the role of surgical therapy for patients with mRCC including cytoreductive nephrectomy and distant metastatectomy.

RECENT FINDINGS

One randomized trial has been published in the targeted therapy era suggesting that initial systemic therapy is non-inferior to cytoreductive nephrectomy among patients with intermediate and poor-risk mRCC. Delaying cytoreductive nephrectomy until after systemic therapy may be a viable treatment approach, although a high level of evidence is lacking. Additional questions remain regarding the sequence of surgery with systemic therapy, utility of distant metastatectomy, as well as the application of these findings to the current generation of immunotherapy. Recent evidence challenges the need of upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy for unselected patients with mRCC. However, surgical therapy continues to play an important role in the management of the disease.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have quickly become a critical component to the management of advanced renal cell carcinoma. These therapies have been approved for patients who are treatment-naive and who have progressed on antiangiogenesis agents. Combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors with antiangiogenesis agents show significant response rates and prolong survival. Adverse events associated with the use of checkpoint inhibition present unique challenges in the management of patients, and careful considerations are needed when checkpoint inhibitors are combined with antiangiogenesis agents. Nevertheless, the improvement in overall survival associated with these agents indicates that they will remain a vital component of kidney cancer treatment.

Current Status and Future Directions of Immunotherapy in Renal Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was recognized as an immunologically sensitive cancer over 30 years ago. The first therapies to affect the course of RCC were cytokines (interferon alfa-2B and interleukin-2). Subsequently, drugs that inhibit HIF (hypoxia-inducible factor)/VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) signaling demonstrated overall survival advantages (tyrosine kinase inhibitors and mTor inhibitors).

RECENT FINDINGS

In the last 3 years, the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the standard of care treatments in the first and second lines for RCC. Emerging data show that combinations of ICI, HIF signaling inhibitors, and cytokines are potentially powerful regimens. How to combine and sequence these types of therapies and how to integrate new approaches into the management of RCC are now the key questions for the field. Treatment of RCC is likely to change dramatically in the next few years.

Clinicopathological impacts of high c-Met expression in renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis and review

c-Met overexpression has been observed in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, its clinicopathological impacts remain uncertain. We performed this meta-analysis to evaluate the pathologic and prognostic impacts of high c-Met expression in patients with RCC. A systematic computerized search of the electronic databases PubMed and Embase was performed. From 12 studies, 1,724 patients with RCC were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with RCCs showing low c-Met expression, tumors with high c-Met expression showed significantly higher nuclear grade (odds ratio = 2.45 [95% CI: 1.43-4.19], P = 0.001) and pT stage (odds ratio = 2.18 [95% CI: 1.27-3.72], P = 0.005). In addition, patients with c-Met-high RCC showed significantly worse overall survival than those with c-Met-low tumor (hazard ratio = 1.32 [95% CI: 1.12-1.56], P = 0.0009). In conclusion, this meta-analysis demonstrates that high c-Met expression correlate with significantly worse pathological features and overall survival, indicating c-Met overexpression is a potential adverse prognostic marker for patients with RCC.

The Role of Nephrectomy for Kidney Cancer in the Era of Targeted and Immune Therapies

Although two phase III trials support the recommendation of nephrectomy followed by interferon alpha in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), this procedure cannot be applied to every patient with this condition. Systemic therapy has changed from interferon alpha to antiangiogenic-targeted therapy, and the clinical impact of nephrectomy in the era of targeted therapy has not been proven. The SEER database shows that only 35% of patients with advanced RCC undergo nephrectomy as their initial treatment. Retrospective studies showed improved overall survival (OS) outcomes with nephrectomy and interleukin-2 (IL-2) therapy; however, the inherent selection bias of younger and healthier patients receiving IL-2 likely accounts for this finding. Neoadjuvant therapy has demonstrated only modest efficacy in unresectable disease, and if remission is obtained with systemic therapy, it is unclear whether nephrectomy has any incremental benefit. In the absence of proven benefit of nephrectomy in the setting of targeted therapy, it seems advisable for patients with RCC with severely symptomatic disease, competing comorbidities, poor performance status, or unresectable disease to avoid nephrectomy and proceed directly to systemic therapy. The clinical implications of deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy for patients with metastatic RCC are poorly understood, and patient cohorts that do not undergo this procedure are likely to be comprised of patients with unfavorable disease characteristics. Unfortunately, the completed trials of targeted therapy were 90% comprised of patients with prior nephrectomy (the majority of trials incorporate prior nephrectomy as an eligibility requirement) and hence may not reflect the outcomes of the majority of the patients with advanced RCC who have not undergone nephrectomy. Newer therapies such as nivolumab and cabozantinib have also been evaluated for a population in which 90% of the patients underwent nephrectomy. Future clinical trials and registry studies must focus on the therapeutic treatment and overall outcome of patients without nephrectomy and treated with contemporary systemic therapy.

Cytoreductive nephrectomy and its role in the present-day period of targeted therapy

The beneficial effect of cytoreductive nephrectomy on survival of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the immunotherapy era was based on two prospective randomized trials. Unfortunately, such evidence does not yet exist in the present-day period of targeted therapy. Despite this, cytoreductive nephrectomy remains integral in the multimodal management of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Multiple retrospective studies as well as data from prospective studies examining targeted therapy support the continued use of cytoreductive nephrectomy in the properly selected patient. Ongoing studies will hopefully fine-tune the role and timing of cytoreductive nephrectomy in the context of targeted therapy.

Computational repositioning and preclinical validation of pentamidine for renal cell cancer

Although early stages of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) are curable, survival outcome for metastatic ccRCC remains poor. We previously established a highly accurate signature of differentially expressed genes that distinguish ccRCC from normal kidney. The purpose of this study was to apply a new individualized bioinformatics analysis (IBA) strategy to these transcriptome data in conjunction with Gene Set Enrichment Analysis of the Connectivity Map (C-MAP) database to identify and reposition FDA-approved drugs for anticancer therapy. Here, we demonstrate that one of the drugs predicted to revert the RCC gene signature toward normal kidney, pentamidine, is effective against RCC cells in culture and in a RCC xenograft model. ccRCC-specific gene expression signatures of individual patients were used to query the C-MAP software. Eight drugs with negative correlation and P-value <0.05 were analyzed for efficacy against RCC in vitro and in vivo. Our data demonstrate consistency across most patients with ccRCC for the set of high-scoring drugs. Most of the selected high-scoring drugs potently induce apoptosis in RCC cells. Several drugs also demonstrate selectivity for Von Hippel-Lindau negative RCC cells. Most importantly, at least one of these drugs, pentamidine, slows tumor growth in the 786-O human ccRCC xenograft mouse model. Our findings suggest that pentamidine might be a new therapeutic agent to be combined with current standard-of-care regimens for patients with metastatic ccRCC and support our notion that IBA combined with C-MAP analysis enables repurposing of FDA-approved drugs for potential anti-RCC therapy.

Optimal management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: current status

The armamentarium for the systemic therapy of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has undergone dramatic changes over the past 6 years. While high-dose interleukin (IL)-2 remains an option for highly selected good and intermediate risk patients with clear-cell histology because of durable complete responses in a small fraction of patients, cytokine-based therapy including interferon (IFN) has been supplanted by vascular-endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors. Treatment decision is initially based on prognostication of the disease. As metastatic RCC (mRCC) is commonly an indolent disease, a period of observation should always been considered. For good and intermediate risk disease, pazopanib, sunitinib or the combination of bevacizumab plus IFN are considered. Notably, recent data suggest non-inferiority for the efficacy of pazopanib compared to sunitinib coupled with a better toxicity profile. A novel VEGF receptor inhibitor, tivozanib, is expected to be approved based on improvement in PFS when compared to sorafenib in the first-line setting. The use of temsirolimus for poor risk disease is supported by a phase III trial dedicated to this group of patients. The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in the context of VEGF and mTOR inhibitors is being studied in randomized trials. Selected patients with solitary or oligometastatic disease may be eligible for metastatectomy. Following first-line VEGF inhibitors, second-line therapy with everolimus and axitinib have demonstrated benefits in progression-free survival (PFS). One phase III trial comparing sorafenib and temsirolimus in the post-sunitinib setting showed no difference in PFS, the primary endpoint, but did show a superior overall survival for sorafenib. Sorafenib, pazopanib and axitinib have all demonstrated clinical benefit following cytokines. Therapy following first-line mTOR inhibitors remains undefined, although VEGF inhibitors have demonstrated activity in this setting. Optimal sequencing of agents and individualized therapy based on biomarkers is undergoing investigation. Today, the choice of therapy is based on patient and physician decision, which is a function of comorbidities, toxicity profiles and costs. Clinical trials evaluating novel agents and combinations should be preferred when available since agents in the current therapeutic arsenal have not yielded cures despite extending median survival to greater than 2 years. One noteworthy new class of agents that has yielded durable responses is programmed death (PD)-1 inhibitors, which target a T-lymphocyte checkpoint and are heralding a resurgence of immunotherapy. Finally, optimal therapy for non-clear cell RCC remains to be delineated, although sunitinib, everolimus and other VEGFR-TKI or mTOR inhibitors have all demonstrated modest benefit.

Cytoreductive nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma is associated with a poor prognosis and a median survival time of only 6-12 months. However, the emergence of immunotherapies has rekindled interest in cytoreductive nephrectomy as a therapeutic option. Phase III randomized trials have demonstrated that cytoreductive nephrectomy significantly improves overall survival in selected patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with interferon immunotherapy. While cytokine-based immunotherapy may be considered the standard systemic therapy, clinical studies are ongoing to develop molecular biomarkers and new therapies with improved efficacy and tolerability. With further advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis, behavior and molecular biology of renal cell carcinoma, cytoreductive nephrectomy, in combination with molecular targeted therapies, may become the new standard of care for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Factors affecting survival in 267 consecutive patients undergoing surgery for spinal metastasis from renal cell carcinoma

OBJECT

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) frequently metastasizes to the spine, and the prognosis can be quite variable. Surgical removal of the tumor with spinal reconstruction has been a mainstay of palliative treatment. The ability to predict prognosis is valuable when determining the role and magnitude of surgical intervention in cancer patients. To better identify factors affecting survival in patients undergoing surgery for spinal metastasis from RCC, the authors undertook a retrospective analysis of a large patient cohort at a tertiary care cancer center.

METHODS

Relevant clinical data on a consecutive series of patients who had undergone surgery for spinal metastasis of RCC between 1993 and 2007 at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data, histopathological grade of primary tumor, timing of spinal surgery relative to diagnosis, treatment history prior to surgery, neurological status, and systemic disease burden were analyzed to determine the impact of these factors on survival outcome.

RESULTS

The authors identified 267 patients who met the study criteria. Five-year overall survival (OS) after spine tumor resection was 7.8%, with a median OS of 11.3 months (95% CI 9.5-13.0 months). Patients with Fuhrman Grade 4 RCC had a median OS of 6.1 months (95% CI 3.5-8.7 months), which was significantly lower than the 14.3 months (95% CI 9.1-19.4 months) observed in patients with Fuhrman Grade 3 or less RCC (p < 0.001). Patients with preoperative neurological deficits had a median survival of 5.9 months (95% CI 4.1-7.7 months), which was significantly lower than the 13.5 months (95% CI 10.4-16.6 months) observed in patients with a normal neurological examination (p < 0.001). Patients whose spine was the only site of metastasis had a median OS of 19 months (95% CI 9.8-28.2 months) after surgery, significantly longer than the 9.7 months (95% CI 8.1-11.3 months) observed in patients with additional extraspinal metastasis sites (p < 0.001). Patients with nonprogressing extraspinal metastasis (no metastasis, stable, or concurrent) had a median survival of 20.6 months (95% CI 15.1-26.1 months), compared with 5.6 months (95% CI 4.4-6.8 months) in patients with progressing metastasis (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The authors identified several factors influencing survival after spine surgery for metastatic spinal RCC, including grade of the original nephrectomy specimen, activity of the systemic disease, and neurological status at the time of surgery. These clinical features may help to identify patients who may benefit from aggressive surgical intervention.

Current status of immunotherapy for the treatment of lung cancer

Immunotherapy is a novel approach for the treatment of systemic malignancies. Passive and adaptive immunotherapy have been applied to the treatment of a wide variety of solid tumors such as malignant melanoma (1), renal cell carcinoma (2) and ovarian cancer (3). Several early clinical trials of immune based therapy for both non-small (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) have demonstrated limited or no success (3),(4) but recent trials of antigen-specific cancer immunotherapy have shown early therapeutic potential and are now being rigorously evaluated on a larger scale (5). In this communication we briefly review the historic aspects of immune based therapy for solid cancer, describe therapeutic strategies aimed at targeting lung cancer, and discuss limitations of current therapy and future directions of this field.

Surgical management of large renal tumors

The surgical management of patients with renal cell carcinoma has undergone many changes. With equivalent oncologic outcomes and appreciation of the importance of renal functional preservation, the utilization of nephron-sparing partial nephrectomy has increased in recent years. Nevertheless, tumors of larger size continue to be preferentially treated with radical nephrectomy. Here, we present evidence that improvements in techniques and durability of oncologic outcomes has justified the use of nephron sparing to accomplish renal functional preservation even in patients with large renal tumors. In addition, surgical technical considerations when managing such tumors are discussed. Finally, we discuss cytoreductive surgery and the evolving role of systemic targeted therapies in the management of advanced metastatic disease.

New surgical horizons: the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy for metastatic kidney cancer

Renal cell carcinoma is the most lethal urologic malignancy. Up to 30% of patients with kidney cancer have metastatic disease and 30% of those treated for local or locally advanced disease will progress to metastases. Radical nephrectomy is the standard treatment for the management of nondisseminated kidney cancer, but the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy for patients with metastatic disease is controversial. In this paper, the rationale for cytoreductive nephrectomy is described and the currently available evidence for and against it is evaluated. The different approaches to defining prognostic factors to select which patients will benefit from cytoreductive nephrectomy will also be described. Finally, the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in the era of new targeted therapies is discussed.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for renal cell carcinoma: ten years after

INTRODUCTION

The first series of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated by non-myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) was reported in 2000 and demonstrated an allogeneic graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effect that encouraged further investigation of this approach. However, the past 10 years have also witnessed profound changes in the medical management of metastatic RCC with the introduction of targeted therapies directed against VEGF or mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathways creating uncertainty about a continued role for allogeneic HCT in the treatment of RCC.

AREAS COVERED

A total of 21 published reports describing clinical outcomes for 398 patients with metastatic RCC treated by allogeneic HCT compiled herein provide a composite overview of the world wide experience for key efficacy and toxicity outcomes. Review of correlative studies that identify donor-derived T cells as mediators of RCC-specific GVT effects offers insight into both the potential as well as the technical barriers to the delivery of antigen-specific post-transplant cellular therapy or vaccination designed to augment the allogeneic GVT effect.

EXPERT OPINION

The future development of non-myeloablative allogeneic HCT for metastatic RCC will require novel treatment protocols designed to augment and sustain post-transplant GVT effects against RCC to generate renewed enthusiasm for this approach.

[Role of surgery (cytoreductive nephrectomy and metastasectomy) in the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a literature review]

Cytoreductive nephrectomy is an established treatment option prior immunotherapy in well-selected patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. With the recent introduction of new targeted agents, the role of surgery has been source of controversy. This review examines the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy during the immunotherapy era, then in the new targeted therapies era. This review also summarizes the optimal timing of these treatments, the prognostic factors predicting outcome following cytoreductive nephrectomy, the role of metastasectomy, partial and laparoscopic cytoreductive nephrectomy.

Progression of intramedullary metastasis during perioperative cessation of sunitinib

BACKGROUND

A 57-year-old woman presented with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). She was enrolled in a clinical study, in which she received two cycles of neoadjuvant sunitinib therapy followed by cytoreductive nephrectomy. Her primary tumor and rib metastasis showed a good response to neoadjuvant therapy; however, after surgery, the patient developed neurologic symptoms, including flaccid paraparesis with paresthesia and hypoesthesia. MRI of the brain and spine revealed a leptomeningeal lesion at the T12-L1 space, which was presumed to have progressed during the 3-week treatment-free perioperative period. The patient underwent radiation therapy for the intramedullary lesion 1 month later, and sunitinib therapy was subsequently reinstated. After 6 months, her extracranial lesions remained stable and the intramedullary lesion was undetectable on MRI.

INVESTIGATIONS

CT of the chest and abdomen, bone scan, kidney and liver function tests, measurement of serum levels of calcium, electrolytes and lactate dehydrogenase, CBC, MRI of the brain and spine.

DIAGNOSIS

Progression of a central nervous system metastasis linked to the interruption of neoadjuvant sunitinib therapy.

MANAGEMENT

Neoadjuvant sunitinib therapy followed by cytoreductive nephrectomy for the primary RCC; radiation therapy for the intramedullary lesion, followed by reinstatement of sunitinib therapy owing to a good clinical response observed in the extracranial lesions.

[Is the cytoreductive nephrectomy still necessary in case of metastases?]

Cytoredutive nephrectomy is a component of metastatic renal cell carcinoma management. This procedure can induce a spontaneous regression of metastases in a small number of cases. It increases the overall survival of correctly selected patients treated with immunotherapy. However, we still do not know if this benefit remains for patient treated with targeted therapies. In the three main prospective randomized studies evaluating targeted therapies, the majority of included patients have had prior nephrectomy. However, this surgical procedure is not without risk and could delay initiation of medical treatment. Age of patient, comorbidities, histologic pattern and surgical difficulties should be taken into account. Until results of prospective studies, the cytoreductive nephrectomy should be still considered as component of the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Renal cell carcinoma with caval involvement: contemporary strategies of surgical treatment

OBJECTIVES

We retrospectively evaluated the outcome of the surgical treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and extensive inferior vena cava (IVC) involvement. Our aim was to investigate if a particular surgical technique could reduce morbidity and complications associated with this condition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 1996 to 2007, 22 patients with RCC and extensive IVC involvement underwent radical surgical treatment with the intention to avoid, whenever possible, sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass. The level of the tumor thrombus was I (<2 cm above the renal vein) in 2 patients, II (below the intrahepatic vena cava) in 9 patients, III (intrahepatic vena cava below the diaphragm) in 7 patients, and IV (atrial) in 4 patients. Extracorporeal vascular bypass was used for 4 patients with level IV and for 2 patients with level III tumor thrombi, with hypothermic circulatory arrest in 2 patients. Extensive liver mobilization techniques were adopted in 16 patients. Overall and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were analyzed based on tumor extent (N0M0, N+M+), pathologic stage (pT3b, pT3c, pT4), thrombus level, and caval wall infiltration.

RESULTS

Two patients died within 1 month of surgery and the remaining 20 patients have a mean follow-up of 32.2 months (range 6-90): 8 are alive (overall survival 40%), but 2 with disease (CSS 30%). A total of 10 severe complications developed in 8 patients (36%). Both overall and CSS were significantly associated with tumor stage (Log-rank P = 0.0237 and 0.0465), presence of nodal or systemic metastases (Log-rank P = 0.0835 and 0.0669; Wilcoxon's test P = 0.0407 and 0.0411), and caval wall infiltration (Log-rank P = 0.0200 and 0.0418).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the low overall survival, related to the high percentage of nodal and systemic metastases, aggressive surgical management with resection of synchronous metastatic disease for symptom palliation and cytoreduction, followed by immunotherapy is justified in this setting. A transabdominal approach to RCC and IVC involvement, even in patients with level III thrombus, can provide the surgeon with an exposure similar to thoracoabdominal incisions without the complications associated with thoracotomy.

Management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: current trends

Renal cell carcinoma is one of the common malignancies of the genitourinary tract. In approximately one third of patients, distant metastases are present at the time of initial diagnosis and in another third, the tumor will recur even after nephrectomy with a curative intent. Renal cell carcinoma is resistant to all conventional treatment modalities of cancer, including radiotherapy and chemotherapy. We review the management of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the era of the new targeted therapeutic agents.

Phase II trial of Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA) virus expressing 5T4 and high dose Interleukin-2 (IL-2) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Background

Interleukin-2 (IL-2) induces durable objective responses in a small cohort of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) but the antigen(s) responsible for tumor rejection are not known. 5T4 is a non-secreted membrane glycoprotein expressed on clear cell and papillary RCCs. A modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) encoding 5T4 was tested in combination with high-dose IL-2 to determine the safety, objective response rate and effect on humoral and cell-mediated immunity.

Methods

25 patients with metastatic RCC who qualified for IL-2 were eligible and received three immunizations every three weeks followed by IL-2 (600,000 IU/kg) after the second and third vaccinations. Blood was collected for analysis of humoral, effector and regulatory T cell responses.

Results

There were no serious vaccine-related adverse events. While no objective responses were observed, three patients (12%) were rendered disease-free after nephrectomy or resection of residual metastatic disease. Twelve patients (48%) had stable disease which was associated with improved median overall survival compared to patients with progressive disease (not reached vs. 28 months, p = 0.0261). All patients developed 5T4-specific antibody responses and 13 patients had an increase in 5T4-specific T cell responses. Although the baseline frequency of Tregs was elevated in all patients, those with stable disease showed a trend toward increased effector CD8+ T cells and a decrease in Tregs.

Conclusion

Vaccination with MVA-5T4 did not improve objective response rates of IL-2 therapy but did result in stable disease associated with an increase in the ratio of 5T4-specific effector to regulatory T cells in selected patients.

Trial registration number

ISRCTN83977250

Identification of an immunogenic CTL epitope of HIFPH3 for immunotherapy of renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

CD8(+) CTLs have an essential role in immune response against tumor. Although tumor-associated antigens have been identified in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), few of these are commonly shared and investigated as therapeutic targets in the clinical medicine. In this report, we show that HIFPH3, a member of prolyl hydroxylases that function as oxygen sensor, is a novel tumor antigen and HIFPH3-specific CTLs are induced from peripheral blood lymphocytes of RCC patients.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Expression of HIFPH3 was examined by reverse transcription-PCR and immunostaining with anti-HIFPH3 antibody. To identify HLA-A24-restricted T-cell epitopes of HIFPH3, eight peptides were selected from the amino acid sequence of this protein and screened for their binding affinity to HLA-A24. Peptide-specific CTLs were induced by stimulating peripheral blood lymphocytes of HLA-A24-positive RCC patients with these peptides in vitro. HLA-A24-restricted cytotoxicity of the CTLs against HIFPH3(+) RCC lines was assessed by chromium release assay.

RESULTS

HIFPH3 was overexpressed in many RCC cell lines and primary RCC tissues, whereas it was not detectable in normal adult tissues by reverse transcription-PCR. Of the eight peptides that contained HLA-A24-binding motif, HIFPH3-8 peptide (amino acid sequence, RYAMTVWYF) could induce the peptide-specific CTLs from 3 of 6 patients with HIFPH3-positive RCC. Furthermore, HIFPH3-8 peptide-specific CTLs showed cytotoxicity against HIFPH3(+) RCC cell lines in a HLA-A24-restricted manner.

CONCLUSIONS

HIFPH3 may be a target antigen in immunotherapy for RCC and HIFPH3-8 peptide could be used as a peptide vaccine for HLA-A*2402(+)/HIFPH3(+) RCC patients.

Cancer-specific survival outcomes among patients treated during the cytokine era of kidney cancer (1989-2005): a benchmark for emerging targeted cancer therapies

BACKGROUND

The management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is evolving toward less extirpative surgery and the use of targeted therapy. The authors set out to provide a benchmark against which emerging therapies should be measured.

METHODS

A prospective database including clinical and pathological variables for 1632 patients with RCC treated between 1989 and 2005 was queried. Patients were stratified using the University of California-Los Angeles Integrated Staging System (UISS) into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. Disease-specific survival (DSS) was measured. Response to systemic therapy for patients with advanced disease was assessed.

RESULTS

Nephrectomy was performed in 1492 patients. Overall 5-, 10-, and 15-year DSS was 55%, 40%, and 29%. For localized disease, 5- and 10-year DSS for UISS low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups was 97% and 92%, 81% and 61%, and 62% and 41%, respectively. For metastatic disease, 5- and 10-year DSS for UISS low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups was 41% and 31%, 18% and 7%, and 8% and 0%, respectively. Patients with metastatic disease receiving immunotherapy (n=453) had complete response in 7% (median survival [MS], 120+ months), partial response in 15% (MS, 42.8 months), stable disease in 33% (MS, 38.6 months), and progressive disease in 45% (MS, 11.6 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with localized RCC do well with surgery alone, but effective adjuvant therapy is needed for patients identified as at high risk for recurrence. For advanced disease, newer targeted and potentially less toxic treatments should be at least as effective as those achieved with aggressive surgical resection and immunotherapy.

Preoperative tyrosine kinase inhibition as an adjunct to debulking nephrectomy

OBJECTIVES

Since the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has undergone dramatic changes. However, the use of TKI therapy in adjunctive settings remains to be defined. We present a single-institution experience of patients who received preoperative TKI before nephrectomy for metastatic or unresectable disease.

METHODS

The records of 9 patients with locally advanced or metastatic RCC treated with TKI therapy before nephrectomy at the University of North Carolina were reviewed. All procedures and radiographic images were performed at 1 institution. The cases were surveyed for the effect of TKI on tumor burden and surgical approach and timing.

RESULTS

The patients received systemic therapy with either sorafenib or sunitinib before proceeding to nephrectomy on clinical trials for metastatic disease or as the standard of care. The surgery was well tolerated by all patients, without an apparent effect from TKI therapy on the surgical technique or complications. Responses were observed in the primary tumor, as well as in the metastatic sites.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant TKI therapy can induce responses in the primary tumor and has the potential advantage of cytoreduction when administered before nephrectomy for RCC. This setting also potentially provides an opportunity to evaluate the TKI responsiveness of patients with metastatic disease. However, prospective trials evaluating adjunctive surgical approaches to locally advanced and metastatic RCC are needed to determine the significant benefits of TKI therapy and to define the optimal agent, timing of therapy, and disease stage to derive benefit for preoperative therapy.

Epidemiologic and socioeconomic burden of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): a literature review

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC), the most common form of kidney cancer, initially has an asymptomatic clinical course; 25-30% of patients present with metastatic disease at time of diagnosis. Worldwide incidence and mortality rates are rising at a rate of approximately 2-3% per decade. Metastatic RCC (mRCC) is one of the most treatment-resistant malignancies; outcomes are generally poor and median survival after diagnosis is less than one year. Surgery and chemotherapy have limited or no effect, leaving mRCC patients underserved in the realm of cancer treatment. As the world's population ages and the prevalence of risk factors (obesity, hypertension) increases, the burden of mRCC is predicted to increase significantly. With a shift in treatment of mRCC to novel therapies, such as molecularly targeted therapies (MTTs) (e.g., sorafenib and sunitinib), clinicians, payers, and other healthcare decision-makers must re-evaluate the optimal role for new treatments. Timely understanding of the burden of mRCC on individuals and society clearly is needed at this juncture. Using a comprehensive literature review, we assessed the epidemiologic, economic, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) burdens of mRCC. The annual incidence of mRCC in major European countries, the US, and Japan ranges from 1500 to 8600 cases. However, prevalence data were lacking. The estimated economic burden of mRCC is large; $107-$556 million (2006 USD) in the US and $446 million-$1.6 billion (2006 USD) collectively in select countries worldwide. MTTs have potential to reduce the burden of mRCC and provide substantial value beyond their clinical effectiveness.

Proteomic identification of interleukin-2 therapy response in metastatic renal cell cancer

PURPOSE

To detect a predictive protein profile that distinguishes interleukin-2 therapy responders and nonresponders among patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma we used surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Protein extracts from 56 patients with metastatic clear cell patients renal cell carcinoma obtained from radical nephrectomy specimens before interleukin-2 therapy were applied to protein chip arrays of different chromatographic properties and analyzed using surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. A class prediction algorithm was applied to identify a subset of protein peaks with expression values associated with interleukin-2 response status. Multivariate analysis was performed to assess the association between the proteomic profile and interleukin-2 response status, controlling for the effect of lymphadenopathy.

RESULTS

From 513 protein peaks we discovered a predictor set of 11 that performed optimally for predicting interleukin-2 response status with 86% accuracy (Fisher's p <0.004, permutation p <0.01). Results were validated in an independent data set with 72% overall accuracy (p <0.05, permutation p <0.01). On multivariate analysis the proteomic profile was significantly associated with the interleukin-2 response when corrected for lymph node status (p <0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified and validated a proteomic pattern that is an independent predictor of the interleukin-2 response. The ability to predict the probability of the interleukin-2 response could permit targeted selection of the patients most likely to respond to interleukin-2, while avoiding unwanted toxicity in patients less likely to respond. This proteomic predictor has the potential to significantly aid clinicians in the decision making of appropriate therapy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Renal cell carcinoma under 35 years of age: comparison of survival rates for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients

INTRODUCTION

Recent studies suggest that RCC detected in young adults is likely to be more symptomatic and potentially aggressive, since young patients are less likely to undergo radiologic examinations unless they have symptoms. The aim of this study is to identify the clinical, biological and histological entities of RCC in young patients, and to compare survival rates for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A review of 2,510 records of patients with RCC from 1965 to 2007 was conducted. Thirty-four patients under 35 years old were identified. The Kaplan-Meier system was used to calculate the cumulative survival rate at five and ten years post-surgery as well as the survival prognoses for patients who presented with symptoms and for patients for whom RCC was incidentally diagnosed.

RESULTS

The differences in cumulative survival rates at five and ten years between patients who presented with symptoms and patients whom RCC was incidentally diagnosed were not significant (P = 0.06). The Kaplan-Meier system used to calculate the cumulative survival rate at five and ten years postsurgery yielded survival rates of 79.4% at five years and 73.5% at ten years, respectively.

DISCUSSION

The biological and histological entities as well as the survival prognosis for RCC in young patients are similar to those for patients who present with RCC in the sixth and seventh decades of life. Additionally, young adults are likely to be more symptomatic, but the difference in survival between patients with symptoms and those without symptoms is not statistically significant.

Recent advances in the therapy of renal cancer

Metastatic clear cell renal cell cancer has traditionally been treated with cytokines (interferon or interleukin-2). Improved understanding of biology has engendered novel targeted therapeutic agents that have radically altered the outlook. Vascular endothelial growth factor, the related receptor and the mTOR signal transduction pathway have particularly been exploited. Sunitinib malate, sorafenib and temsirolimus have improved clinical outcomes compared with interferon in randomized trials. Other multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (lapatinib, axatinib and pazopanib) and antiangiogenic agents (bevacizumab and lenalidomide) have also demonstrated activity in early studies. Combinations of these agents are being evaluated. The future of the therapy of renal cancer appears promising owing to the efficacy of these novel agents. Clinical trials designed to further assess these and other agents need to be vigorously supported.

Renal cell carcinoma in children under 10 years old: a presentation of four cases

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in childhood is a unique disease entity, representing only 2.3-6.6% of all renal tumors in children. Most experience with pediatric RCC is limited to case reports or case series consisting of relatively small numbers of cases. The aim of this study is to present four additional cases of this unique disease entity. The records of four patients presenting to our institution with renal cell carcinoma between 1986 and 2006 were examined. Only patients younger than 10 years were included. The clinical data included age, sex, signs and symptoms, surgery performed and clinical outcome. Data recorded from the pathology reports included tumor size, histologic subtype, grade (WHO), and stage (TNM). There were three boys and one girl aged between 11 months and 10 years at presentation. The classic triad of flank pain, gross hematuria and palpable abdominal mass were not encountered. A histopathological diagnosis of RCC was confirmed in all four cases without any positive lymph node involvement. Due to the increased detection of tumors with the use of imaging techniques such as ultrasound and computerized tomography, an increased number of incidentally diagnosed RCCs are found. The primary choice of the treatment of any stage of RCC is surgical excision. However, the preoperative diagnosis of tumor in children is difficult and the effects of chemotherapy, including immunotherapy, are unclear.

Multimodal approaches in the management of locally advanced and metastatic renal cell carcinoma: combining surgery and systemic therapies to improve patient outcome

Patients with locally advanced renal cell carcinoma are at high risk of metastatic relapse following surgery. Patients with metastatic disease have a poor prognosis and few systemic therapy options. Radiation, chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, vaccines, and immunotherapy have all been tested as adjuvant therapy without benefit. Neoadjuvant therapy in the metastatic setting holds promise as a new treatment paradigm. It can serve as a litmus test to allow proper patient selection for aggressive surgical intervention and may provide limited downstaging of primary tumors in selected cases. It can also provide a histologic assessment of the effect of targeted therapy. Application of this paradigm may have merit in the locally advanced setting as well. Effective adjuvant therapy for renal cell carcinoma remains elusive. The benefit of new targeted therapies has yet to be tested in this setting. Neoadjuvant strategies that integrate aggressive surgical intervention with systemic therapy may hold promise as a treatment paradigm.

Genomics of Renal Cell Cancer: The Biology Behind and the Therapy Ahead

Renal cell cancer (RCC) is the most lethal of the urological cancers and accounts for 3% of all adult malignancies. Despite numerous recent advances in diagnostic imaging, surgical therapy, and basic molecular understanding, many patients still experience metastatic disease. For metastatic disease patients, response rates to conventional therapies rarely exceed 15% to 25% and are associated with serious adverse effects. The recent development of novel targeted therapies based on the precise biological pathways deregulated in a particular patient has paved the way for individualized, targeted patient management. Nevertheless, to achieve this goal, it is important to delineate the molecular mechanisms underlying cancer development and progression. Genomic approaches have revolutionized the field of cancer research and have led to the rapid discovery of multiple, parallel disease hypotheses, which ultimately have to be validated in large cohorts of patients and in downstream biological experiments for translation into clinical applications. The variable course of RCC and, until recently, a paucity of therapeutic options in the event of metastasis have led to the search for diagnostic and prognostic markers. We and others have used transcriptional profiling to classify different subtypes of RCC and to identify subtype- and metastasis-specific gene signatures predictive for outcome. We discuss herein recent genomic approaches to RCC and the emerging biological pathways underlying RCC development and progression. We also speculate how genomics may affect drug development and the management of patients with RCC.

Cytoreductive Nephrectomy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Is It Still Imperative in the Era of Targeted Therapy?

In the era before cytokine therapy, controversy existed about the need for cytoreductive nephrectomy in treating patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. In 1978, Dekernion showed that nephrectomy alone had no effect on survival. During this period, removal of the malignant kidney was confined to palliative therapy in some settings of metastatic RCC, such as pain related to the kidney mass, intractable hematuria, erythrocytosis, uncontrolled hypertension, or poorly controlled hypercalcemia. When interleukin-2 was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 1992, the role of nephrectomy was reexamined. After a decade of controversy, two randomized controlled studies established that cytoreductive surgery has a role in properly selected patients and offers a survival advantage when done before cytokine therapy. Unfortunately, the mechanisms underlying this benefit remain poorly understood. Immunotherapy may work best when there is a small volume of cancer present, and removing a large primary tumor may prevent the seeding of additional metastases. Data have also suggested that primary tumors were capable of producing immunosuppressive compounds that might decrease the efficacy of immunotherapy. Another hypothesis suggested that removing the kidney altered the acid/base status of the patient to such an extent that the growth of the tumor was hindered. With the emergence in 2006 of two targeted agents for advanced renal cell carcinoma, the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy has re-emerged as a source of controversy. Although evidence-based medical practice suggests a role for nephrectomy before the use of targeted agents, the arguments for and against this practice will be weighed.

Evolving principles of surgical management and prognostic factors for outcome in renal cell carcinoma

The generally accepted principles for the surgical management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) were first described more than 30 years ago. Since then, much has changed in the understanding of the basic biology and genetics of kidney cancer. Improvements in cross-sectional imaging has allowed for more accurate preoperative clinical staging of renal tumors, and the necessity of completing all the components of the radical nephrectomy have been questioned. Surgical techniques have also evolved, and technology has advanced to make possible new methods of managing renal tumors. The TNM staging system is currently the most extensively used system to provide prognostic information for RCC. However, data published in the last few years has led to significant controversies as to whether further revisions are needed and whether improvements can be made with the introduction of new, more accurate and predictive prognostic factors. Furthermore, the recent discovery of molecular tumor markers are expected to revolutionize the staging of RCC and lead to the development of new therapies based on molecular targeting. This review will examine the evolving principles in the surgical management of RCC as well as provide an update on current staging modalities and prognostic factors.

Autologous renal cell cancer vaccines using heat shock protein-peptide complexes

Investigations into the role of heat shock proteins (HSPs) in immune response have progressed well into a third decade, and indications of their use for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the adjuvant setting will be revealed in the near future when a randomized phase III clinical trial is completed. Additional ongoing and planned randomized clinical trials will test the efficacy of HSP-based vaccines in more advanced stages of RCC. This review describes the compelling scientific rationale behind testing HSPs in RCC against the backdrop of other immunotherapeutic approaches in this indication.

Survival analysis after resection of metastatic disease followed by peptide vaccines in patients with Stage IV melanoma

BACKGROUND

Metastatic melanoma carries a poor prognosis, with a median survival of 7-9 months. Surgical resection of metastatic disease has been advocated to improve survival. Immunotherapy after metastasectomy may further improve the outcome for high-risk resected disease.

METHODS

Charts from patients treated on institutional vaccine trials were analyzed. Patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage IV melanoma who underwent surgical resection of metastatic sites followed by treatment on a peptide vaccine trial were eligible for this study. Survival was calculated from the date of enrollment on the clinical trial.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients met inclusion criteria. The median age was 56.5 years, with approximately equal numbers of men and women. The ECOG performance status was 0 in all patients. Approximately 46% of patients underwent resection of visceral metastases before vaccine. The median follow-up was 5.6 years. The median overall survival was 3.8 years.

CONCLUSIONS

In selected patients with AJCC Stage IV melanoma, resection of metastatic disease followed by vaccine therapy can result in long-term survival.