Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital. Case 11-2009. A 47-year-old man with fever, headache, rash, and vomiting

[Initial patient assessment of infectious diseases and diagnostic steps with fever]

The initial assessment of patients with infectious diseases is challenging because of the extremely broad differential diagnosis as well as different host pathogen interactions influenced by a different immune status. The formal initial assessment, including the present and past medical history, thorough physical examination, clinical first impressions as well as routine laboratory analyses, is the basis of every preliminary diagnosis. Specific chief complaints have to be recognized in order to narrow down the differential diagnosis. In cases of life-threatening illnesses, such as septicemia, endocarditis, bacterial meningitis and severe pneumonia, the first diagnostic and therapeutic steps should be performed in a rapid sequence: bacterial blood samples, sputum and/or liquor samples are required and the initial antibiotic therapy has to be chosen empirically as the relevant bacterial spectrum related to the suspected illness must be covered. In less urgent cases it is recommended that a multi-step diagnostic approach be carried out which takes the differential diagnosis into account and prioritizes the probabilities. In the latter situation antibiotic treatment should be delayed to diagnose the infection correctly. Importantly, atypical courses must necessitate careful and critical reassessment of the diagnosis.

Clinical management of acute HIV infection: best practice remains unknown

Best practice for the clinical management of acute human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection remains unknown. Although some data suggest possible immunologic, virologic, or clinical benefit of early treatment, other studies show no difference in these outcomes over time, after early treatment is discontinued. The literature on acute HIV infection is predominantly small nonrandomized studies, which further limits interpretation. As a result, the physician is left to grapple with these uncertainties while making clinical decisions for patients with acute HIV infection. Here we review the literature, focusing on the potential advantages and disadvantages of treating acute HIV infection outlined in treatment guidelines, and summarize the presentations on clinical management of acute HIV infection from the 2009 Acute HIV Infection Meeting in Boston, Massachusetts.