The new recommendations on duty hours from the ACGME Task Force

Night Float vs. Traditional Call in Interventional Radiology: Impacts on Resident Wellness and Nighttime Clinical Service

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of an Interventional Radiology resident night float system on resident well-being and clinical workflow.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study spanned a period of 12 months, 6 months in which residents worked on night using a traditional call system without guaranteed post-call days, and 6 months of a night float system in which a night float dedicated resident was taking a week of night calls, with no daytime duties. "IR short communication notes", and "Full patient consult notes", documented by the on-call- resident between 6 PM and 7 AM were reviewed. The overall number of notes and the number of notes documented per resident were compared between the two periods. Additionally, current and alumni residents, advanced practice providers, and faculty physicians were surveyed about their perception of the night float system as it compares to the old call system.

RESULTS

The volume of notes increased significantly with the implementation of the night float system, from 127 to 375 (p=0.03). Over the 6-month night float period, the median number of short communication notes per resident increased from 4.5 (4-6.5) to 9.5 (9-13), p=0.04, while full patient consult notes rose from 16 (8.75-19.5) to 53 (36.25-61.5), p=0.002. Survey results from residents showed a better perception of their wellness under night float (25% were positively affected, compared to 0% during the traditional call system). A perceived overall improvement in patient care was reported by 100% of IR faculty and APPs with night float.

CONCLUSION

Night float implementation enhanced IR resident productivity and wellness as evidenced by increased documented clinical encounters and positive feedback.

A novel program of cadaver surgical training for young surgeons at the Clinical Anatomy Laboratory Nagoya (CALNA)

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a cadaver surgical training program at the Clinical Anatomy Laboratory Nagoya (CALNA), focusing on its impact on procedural skills, confidence, and anatomical understanding among young and mid-career thoracic surgeons.

METHODS

From 2016 to 2024, 13 cadaver surgical training sessions were conducted, divided into basic, advanced, and specialized courses. The program included hands-on practice using cadavers preserved with Thiel or hypertonic saline methods. The surveys were administered post-training to assess confidence, satisfaction, and practical applicability. Statistical analysis was performed on the survey results.

RESULTS

A total of 100 participants attended the training sessions (mean: 12.5/session). The survey responses indicated that 92% of participants rated the training content as "good" or "excellent," and 88% found the training "applicable" or "highly applicable" to clinical practice. Reflective discussions following each session facilitated iterative program refinement. The key improvements included enhanced surgical instrument availability and optimized trainee-to-instructor ratios.

CONCLUSIONS

Our cadaver surgical training program was shown to significantly enhance surgical skills, boost confidence, and deepen thoracic anatomical understanding, demonstrating its value in advancing thoracic surgical education. Further development of standardized programs across institutions is needed to enable novice surgeons to acquire advanced skills efficiently.

Consistent Direction Despite Wavering Policy: Reductions in Resident Physician Extended Duration Shifts Over 20 Years

We examined data from 17,498 physicians-in-training who reported on 92,662 months of work over a 20-year study interval that included three major revisions to work hour limits. Extended duration shifts (≥24 hours; EDS) are much less common than they used to be. On average, first-year resident physicians (PGY1s) currently work a total of 4 EDS per year and 3 EDS per month during months in which any EDS are worked. This is in stark contrast to the experience of PGY1s training in the early 2000s when the average was approximately 1 EDS per week over the year. More senior resident physicians (PGY2+) have observed concurrent reductions despite their exclusion from the ACGME guidelines limiting EDS. Resident physicians across all levels of training in surgical programs continue to work more EDS than those in medical programs. Similarly, resident physicians on intensive care unit rotations work these shifts more frequently compared to other rotations.

Burnout among medical residents: key drivers and practical mitigating strategies

Burnout is a prevalent phenomenon in medicine, affecting >50% of physicians and up to 60% of medical residents. This has negative consequences for both doctors' mental health and job satisfaction as well as patient care quality. While numerous studies have explored the causes, psychological effects, and workplace solutions, we aim to practicalize the issue from the perspectives of residents by discussing three key drivers of burnout and offering actionable, multipronged strategies that may be able to tackle these root causes effectively. From review of relevant literature and personal reflections/experiences, we identified three key factors that contribute to resident burnout, namely, (i) inherent physician attributes, (ii) mismatched expectations of the medical profession, and (iii) stressful nature of clinical work and residency training for junior physicians. We offer practical strategies that can be implemented by various stakeholders in a concerted manner to target these three areas, namely, to inculcate and foster accurate perception of the medical profession at the outset, develop psychological strength/resilience among medical residents, and make practical improvements to working and training environments.

A National Survey of Obstetrics and Gynecology Resident Perspectives on Their Preparedness to Provide Care for Underserved Patients with Gynecologic Malignancies

Obstetrics and Gynecology (Ob/Gyn) residents will encounter, screen for, and diagnose gynecologic malignancies. This survey assessed residents' confidence in providing NCCN Guidelines-based care to Gynecologic Oncology patients of differing racial/ethnic backgrounds and insurance statuses while accounting for residents' backgrounds. An anonymous, novel Qualtrics survey was disseminated to current US Ob/Gyn residents, with multiple-choice questions about subject demographics and Likert scale questions about their readiness to care for diverse patients. Differences in responses between racial groups were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis Rank Sum test. Differences in responses between ethnic groups were evaluated using the Wilcoxon Rank Sum test. Regardless of their backgrounds, residents feel "somewhat prepared" to care for diverse patients. There was no statistical between ethnic groups regarding confidence in caring for racial minorities or insurance types. Similarly, there was no statistical difference between racial groups regarding caring for racial minorities, but a difference did exist for insurance types (p = 0.027). No significant racial/ethnic differences were found in opinions on trial enrollment or chemotherapy delays, though most residents agreed that racial/ethnic minorities face delays in chemotherapy. Finally, resident ethnicity and race both impacted resident perceptions of difficulties for Medicaid and minority patients in obtaining non-operative gynecologic care (p = 0.044; p = 0.017) and scheduling outpatient appointments (p = 0.016; p = 0.032). Ob/Gyn residents feel prepared to provide NCCN Guidelines-based care to socioeconomically diverse patients with gynecologic malignancies, though differences exist when accounting for residents' racial/ethnic backgrounds. These results reflect the importance of emphasizing on culturally competent care in residency, particularly for patients with cancer.

Legal Risk to the Emergency Medicine Resident in Training and Attending Supervisors

Medical malpractice is an inevitable truth of being a practicing provider. Despite awareness of malpractice risk, education on understanding the legal landscape and protecting oneself from being named in a malpractice claim is sorely underrepresented in medical school and residency curricula. This review summarizes what is known about the legal risks to the resident in training and the attending physician supervisor. It also explores the legal landscape for physicians practicing and supervising telehealth encounters.

Turning the "Page" Again: Decreasing Inappropriate After-Hours Pages

OBJECTIVE

To decrease the number of inappropriate pages after-hours by 50%.

METHODS

Over 9 weeks, after-hours pages to the on-call resident at University of Minnesota Department of Urology were documented. Pages were deemed "appropriate" or "inappropriate" by 3 independent reviewers. The source of each page was reviewed and after several plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles, 3 separate interventions were created, directed at floor nursing, patient phone calls, and the call triage center. After a 6-week implementation period, data were re-collected for 9 weeks. Descriptive statistics were generated, and a Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare inappropriate pages pre- and post- interventions.

RESULTS

In phase I, 48 shifts were recorded. The mean number of pages per shift was 8.9 (range 1-27), with 52.7% of pages considered "inappropriate." Most pages came from the wards (48.9%) followed by the emergency department (20.4%), patient phone calls (19.4%), and the call center (2.6%). From these domains, the call center had the highest proportion of inappropriate pages (90.9%). In phase II, 39 shifts were recorded. The mean number of pages per shift decreased to 6.0 (range 1-20), and inappropriate pages per shift decreased by 68.4%, (P <.0001).

CONCLUSION

By improving communication to nurses, patients, and call center personnel, inappropriate after-hours pages decreased by 68.4%-exceeding our aim. Future studies are needed to assess if the impact was sustainable over time.

From Chrysalis to Taking Flight, the Metamorphosis of the ACGME During Dr Thomas Nasca's Tenure as CEO

Thomas J. Nasca, MD, MACP, served as the President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) for 17 years, with his tenure ending December 2024. During this time he led and supported significant changes in accreditation and medical education. This article will examine the changes during this period through the lens of key themes, including the redesign of the graduate medical education (GME) accreditation model and new and expanded roles that the ACGME assumed during 3 phases between 2007 and 2024: (1) the development years leading to the Next Accreditation System (NAS), (2) implementation of the NAS, and (3) the COVID-19 pandemic. Launched in 2012, the NAS redesigned accreditation as a balanced combination of assurance- and improvement-focused policies and activities. The NAS served as the foundation for harmonizing GME training through the creation of the single accreditation system. The ACGME also took on new roles within the professional self-regulatory system by tackling difficult issues such as wellness and physician suicide, as well as diversity, equity, and inclusion in medical education. In addition, the ACGME substantially expanded its role as facilitator and educator via the introduction of multiple resources to support GME. However, the medical education landscape remains complex and faces continued uncertainty, especially as it emerges from the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. The next ACGME President and CEO faces critical issues in GME.

Looking beyond duty hours: Offering a balanced quantitative-qualitative approach to resident burnout

Burnout, stress and overwork are highly prevalent amongst junior training physicians worldwide, which explains the widespread phenomenon of physicians leaving the field and organised protests/strikes for better working conditions. Back in 2003, the mandatory duty hour restriction was a landmark intervention rolled out by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education that formally mandated limiting working hours of trainee residents to no more than 80 h per week, and not exceeding 24-h shifts with 6 added hours for education and handover. Nonetheless, 20 years later, this measure continues to be subject to multiple debates on its purported efficacy in achieving its intended objectives and fails to adequately prevent physician burnout and exodus. In our view, the current duty hour restriction model is, in and of itself, inadequate for combating burnout amongst medical residents for several reasons, including insignificant reduction in duty hours with suboptimal adherence/reporting, failure to account for off-site clinical and non-clinical duties, as well as nature of clinical work which typically involves high work intensity in less-than-optimal/unconducive work environments and significant psychoemotional stress. In this article, we offer our perspectives on pursuing a balanced approach towards both meaningful quantitative reduction in working hours as well as practical qualitative improvement in nature of clinical and non-clinical work that could collectively address resident burnout and improve work and training outcomes.

Global disparities in surgeons' workloads, academic engagement and rest periods: the on-calL shIft fOr geNEral SurgeonS (LIONESS) study

The workload of general surgeons is multifaceted, encompassing not only surgical procedures but also a myriad of other responsibilities. From April to May 2023, we conducted a CHERRIES-compliant internet-based survey analyzing clinical practice, academic engagement, and post-on-call rest. The questionnaire featured six sections with 35 questions. Statistical analysis used Chi-square tests, ANOVA, and logistic regression (SPSS® v. 28). The survey received a total of 1.046 responses (65.4%). Over 78.0% of responders came from Europe, 65.1% came from a general surgery unit; 92.8% of European and 87.5% of North American respondents were involved in research, compared to 71.7% in Africa. Europe led in publishing research studies (6.6 ± 8.6 yearly). Teaching involvement was high in North America (100%) and Africa (91.7%). Surgeons reported an average of 6.7 ± 4.9 on-call shifts per month, with European and North American surgeons experiencing 6.5 ± 4.9 and 7.8 ± 4.1 on-calls monthly, respectively. African surgeons had the highest on-call frequency (8.7 ± 6.1). Post-on-call, only 35.1% of respondents received a day off. Europeans were most likely (40%) to have a day off, while African surgeons were least likely (6.7%). On the adjusted multivariable analysis HDI (Human Development Index) (aOR 1.993) hospital capacity > 400 beds (aOR 2.423), working in a specialty surgery unit (aOR 2.087), and making the on-call in-house (aOR 5.446), significantly predicted the likelihood of having a day off after an on-call shift. Our study revealed critical insights into the disparities in workload, access to research, and professional opportunities for surgeons across different continents, underscored by the HDI.

Is Night Surgery a Nightmare for Lung Transplantation?

Night work is frequently associated with sleep deprivation and is associated with greater surgical and medical complications. Lung transplantation (LT) is carried out both at night and during the day and involves many medical healthcare workers. The goal of the study was to compare morbidity and mortality between LT recipients according to LT operative time. We performed a retrospective, observational, single-center study. When the procedure started between 6 AM and 6 PM, the patient was allocated to the Daytime group. If the procedure started between 6 PM and 6 AM, the patient was allocated to the Nighttime group. Between January 2015 and December 2020, 253 patients were included. A total of 168 (66%) patients were classified into the Day group, and 85 (34%) patients were classified into the Night group. Lung Donors' general characteristics were similar between the groups. The 90-day and one-year mortality rates were similar between the groups (90-days: n = 13 (15%) vs. n = 26 (15%), p = 0.970; 1 year: n = 18 (21%) vs. n = 42 (25%), p = 0.499). Daytime LT was associated with more one-year airway dehiscence (n = 36 (21%) vs. n = 6 (7.1%), p = 0.004). In conclusion, among patients who underwent LT, there was no significant association between operative time and survival.

Exposure to the reproductive endocrinology subspecialty among obstetrics and gynecology residency programs

PURPOSE

Prior studies found that Ob-gyn trainees believe they have inadequate experience in the REI subspecialty. We evaluated the amount of time devoted to REI within the 4-year rotation schedule of ACGME-accredited Ob-gyn residency programs.

METHODS

A list of current Ob-gyn residency programs, both with and without REI fellowships, was created using ACOG and ACGME databases. The programs' websites were reviewed, or the program coordinator was queried to determine the length and year of REI rotation, and the career or fellowships pursued by alumni. Wilcoxon rank sum test was utilized to assess differences in total REI rotation time between REI-affiliated and non-affiliated programs. Spearman's correlation was utilized to assess the association between total REI exposure and the percentage of alumni pursuing REI fellowships.

RESULTS

Cumulative length of REI rotations throughout residency ranged from 0 to 20 weeks. Mean cumulative rotation length was greater in non-REI than in REI-affiliated programs (7.4 weeks vs. 6.1 weeks, p = 0.007). However, REI-affiliated programs had greater exposure to REI rotations during the first 2 years of residency (3.9 weeks vs 3.1 weeks, p = 0.042). Among all programs, 24% had the REI rotation in PGY-1, 61% in PGY-2, 50% in PGY-3, and 16% in PGY-4. The proportion of alumni matching in REI fellowship was significantly greater in REI-affiliated programs than non-REI affiliated programs (9.5% vs. 3.1%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Compared to non-REI affiliated programs, Ob-gyn residencies affiliated with REI fellowships spend less time throughout residency training in REI rotations while sending a greater proportion of residents to REI fellowships.

A qualitative study on the adoption of the new duty hour regulations among medical residents and faculty in Korea

Duty hour regulations (DHRs) were enforced in 2017 in Korea to prevent the detrimental effects of excessively prolonged working hours among medical residents. We investigated the adoption of and implications of the new DHRs among medical residents and faculty members. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 medical residents and 9 faculty members across general surgery, internal medicine, obstetrics-gynecology, and pediatrics departments at Chonnam National University Hospital. Based on the constructivist grounded theory, we developed themes from the data by concurrent coding and analysis with theoretical sampling until data saturation. In addition, respondent validation was used to ensure accuracy, and all authors remained reflexive throughout the study to improve validity. The methods of DHRs adoption among residents and faculty members included the following 4 themes: DHRs improved work schedule, residents have more time to learn on their own, clinical departments have come to distribute work, organization members have strived to improve patient safety. Residents have undertaken initial steps towards creating a balance between personal life and work. Teamwork and shift within the same team are the transitions that minimize discontinuity of patient care considering patient safety. Teaching hospitals, including faculty members, should ensure that residents' work and education are balanced with appropriate clinical experience and competency-based training.

Case Curve: A Novel Web-Based Platform and Mobile Phone Application to Evaluate Surgical Competence in Graduate Medical Education

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Competency-based medical education is well established, yet methods to evaluate and document acquisition of surgical skill remain underdeveloped. We describe a novel web-based application for competency-based surgical education at a single neurosurgical department over a 3-year period.

METHODS

We used a web-based application to track procedural and cognitive skills acquisition for neurosurgical residents. This process included self-assessment, resident peer evaluations, evaluations from supervising attending physicians, and blinded video reviews. Direct observation by faculty and video recordings were used to evaluate surgical skill. Cases were subdivided into component skills, which were evaluated using a 5-point scale. The learning curve for each skill was continuously updated and compared with expectations. Progress was reviewed at a monthly surgical skills conference that involved discussion and analysis of recorded surgical performances.

RESULTS

During an escalating 3-year pilot from 2019 to 2022, a total of 1078 cases in 39 categories were accrued by 17 resident physicians with 10 neurosurgical faculty who participated as evaluators. A total of 16 251 skill performances in 110 categories were evaluated. The most evaluated skills were those that were common to several types of procedures, such as positioning, hemostasis, and wound closure. The concordance between attending evaluations and resident self-evaluations was 76%, with residents underestimating their performance in 17% of evaluations and overestimating in 7%.

CONCLUSION

We developed a method for evaluating and tracking surgical resident skill performance with an application that provides timely and actionable feedback. The data collected from this system could allow more accurate assessments of surgical skills and deeper insights into factors influencing surgical skill acquisition.

Fatigue and fallibility: the perils of prolonged shifts for neonatologists

Sleep deprivation is a major challenge for neonatologists, who face increasing demands in the complex healthcare system. Current neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) schedule models often include extended shifts and overnight call, which can lead to sleep deprivation. This lack of sufficient sleep poses adverse health risks to neonatologists and can impair cognitive function, which increases the risk of medical errors and compromises patient safety. This paper proposes reducing shift durations and implementing policies and interventions to reduce fatigue among neonatologists and improve patient safety. The paper also offers policymakers, healthcare leaders, and NICU physicians valuable insights on potential ways to promote the health of the neonatologist workforce and safety in the NICU.

"Multivariate analysis of the impact of sleep and working hours on medical errors: a MICE approach"

BACKGROUND

The main objective of this study was to describe the relationship between working conditions, sleep and psycho-affective variables and medical errors.

METHODS

This was an observational, analytical and cross-sectional study in which 661 medical residents answered questionnaires about working conditions, sleep and psycho-affective variables. Actigraphic sleep parameters and peripheral temperature circadian rhythm were measured in a subgroup of 38 subjects. Bivariate and multivariate predictors of medical errors were assessed.

RESULTS

Medical residents reported working 66.2 ± 21.9 weekly hours. The longest continuous shift was of 28.4 ± 10.9 h. They reported sleeping 6.1 ± 1.6 h per day, with a sleep debt of 94 ± 129 min in workdays. A high percentage of them reported symptoms related to psycho-affective disorders. The longest continuous shift duration (OR = 1.03 [95% CI, 1.00-1.05], p = 0.01), working more than six monthly on-call shifts (OR = 1.87 [95% CI, 1.16-3.02], p = 0.01) and sleeping less than six hours per working day (OR = 1.66 [95% CI, 1.10-2.51], p = 0.02) were independently associated with self-reported medical errors. The report of medical errors was associated with an increase in the percentage of diurnal sleep (2.2% [95% CI, 0.1-4.3] vs 14.5% [95% CI, 5.9-23.0]; p = 0.01) in the actigraphic recording.

CONCLUSIONS

Medical residents have a high working hour load that affect their sleep opportunities, circadian rhythms and psycho-affective health, which are also related to the report of medical errors. These results highlight the importance of implementing multidimensional strategies to improve medical trainees' sleep and wellbeing, increasing in turn their own and patients' safety.

The effects of resident work hours on well-being, performance, and education: A review from a Japanese perspective

This article examines the impact of working-hour restrictions on the well-being, performance, and education of medical residents in Japan. Despite Japan's plan to introduce new regulations for resident working hours by 2024, there is still an ongoing debate regarding their appropriateness. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current regulations of resident working hours worldwide, with a specific focus on weekly hours. The varying regulations are highlighted, including the 80-hour-per-week regulation in the United States and the 48-h-per-week regulation in the European Union influencing other regions. The article also discusses the effectiveness of working-hour restrictions on residents' mental health, with shorter working hours having potentially greater benefits. However, the impacts on medical safety and resident education are mixed, and further reduction in working hours must be carefully considered to avoid adverse effects. The planned changes to working-hour limits for residents in Japan offer a unique opportunity to gain new evidence on the impact of such regulations, which will be of interest to policymakers and researchers worldwide.

Adapting shift work schedules for sleep quality, sleep duration, and sleepiness in shift workers

BACKGROUND

Shift work is associated with insufficient sleep, which can compromise worker alertness with ultimate effects on occupational health and safety. Adapting shift work schedules may reduce adverse occupational outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of shift schedule adaptation on sleep quality, sleep duration, and sleepiness among shift workers.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase, and eight other databases on 13 December 2020, and again on 20 April 2022, applying no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs, including controlled before-after (CBA) trials, interrupted time series, and cross-over trials. Eligible trials evaluated any of the following shift schedule components. • Permanency of shifts • Regularity of shift changes • Direction of shift rotation • Speed of rotation • Shift duration • Timing of start of shifts • Distribution of shift schedule • Time off between shifts • Split shifts • Protected sleep • Worker participation We included studies that assessed sleep quality off-shift, sleep duration off-shift, or sleepiness during shifts.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened the titles and abstracts of the records recovered by the search, read through the full-text articles of potentially eligible studies, and extracted data. We assessed the risk of bias of included studies using the Cochrane risk of bias tool, with specific additional domains for non-randomised and cluster-randomised studies. For all stages, we resolved any disagreements by consulting a third review author. We presented the results by study design and combined clinically homogeneous studies in meta-analyses using random-effects models. We assessed the certainty of the evidence with GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 11 studies with a total of 2125 participants. One study was conducted in a laboratory setting and was not considered for drawing conclusions on intervention effects. The included studies investigated different and often multiple changes to shift schedule, and were heterogeneous with respect to outcome measurement. Forward versus backward rotation Three CBA trials (561 participants) investigated the effects of forward rotation versus backward rotation. Only one CBA trial provided sufficient data for the quantitative analysis; it provided very low-certainty evidence that forward rotation compared with backward rotation did not affect sleep quality measured with the Basic Nordic Sleep Questionnaire (BNSQ; mean difference (MD) -0.20 points, 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.28 to 1.89; 62 participants) or sleep duration off-shift (MD -0.21 hours, 95% CI -3.29 to 2.88; 62 participants). However, there was also very low-certainty evidence that forward rotation reduced sleepiness during shifts measured with the BNSQ (MD -1.24 points, 95% CI -2.24 to -0.24; 62 participants). Faster versus slower rotation Two CBA trials and one non-randomised cross-over trial (341 participants) evaluated faster versus slower shift rotation. We were able to meta-analyse data from two studies. There was low-certainty evidence of no difference in sleep quality off-shift (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.01, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.23) and very low-certainty evidence that faster shift rotation reduced sleep duration off-shift (SMD -0.26, 95% CI -0.51 to -0.01; 2 studies, 282 participants). The SMD for sleep duration translated to an MD of 0.38 hours' less sleep per day (95% CI -0.74 to -0.01). One study provided very low-certainty evidence that faster rotations decreased sleepiness during shifts measured with the BNSQ (MD -1.24 points, 95% CI -2.24 to -0.24; 62 participants). Limited shift duration (16 hours) versus unlimited shift duration Two RCTs (760 participants) evaluated 80-hour workweeks with maximum daily shift duration of 16 hours versus workweeks without any daily shift duration limits. There was low-certainty evidence that the 16-hour limit increased sleep duration off-shift (SMD 0.50, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.78; which translated to an MD of 0.73 hours' more sleep per day, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.13; 2 RCTs, 760 participants) and moderate-certainty evidence that the 16-hour limit reduced sleepiness during shifts, measured with the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (SMD -0.29, 95% CI -0.44 to -0.14; which translated to an MD of 0.37 fewer points, 95% CI -0.55 to -0.17; 2 RCTs, 716 participants). Shorter versus longer shifts One RCT, one CBA trial, and one non-randomised cross-over trial (692 participants) evaluated shorter shift duration (eight to 10 hours) versus longer shift duration (two to three hours longer). There was very low-certainty evidence of no difference in sleep quality (SMD -0.23, 95% CI -0.61 to 0.15; which translated to an MD of 0.13 points lower on a scale of 1 to 5; 2 studies, 111 participants) or sleep duration off-shift (SMD 0.18, 95% CI -0.17 to 0.54; which translated to an MD of 0.26 hours' less sleep per day; 2 studies, 121 participants). The RCT and the non-randomised cross-over study found that shorter shifts reduced sleepiness during shifts, while the CBA study found no effect on sleepiness. More compressed versus more spread out shift schedules One RCT and one CBA trial (346 participants) evaluated more compressed versus more spread out shift schedules. The CBA trial provided very low-certainty evidence of no difference between the groups in sleep quality off-shift (MD 0.31 points, 95% CI -0.53 to 1.15) and sleep duration off-shift (MD 0.52 hours, 95% CI -0.52 to 1.56).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Forward and faster rotation may reduce sleepiness during shifts, and may make no difference to sleep quality, but the evidence is very uncertain. Very low-certainty evidence indicated that sleep duration off-shift decreases with faster rotation. Low-certainty evidence indicated that on-duty workweeks with shift duration limited to 16 hours increases sleep duration, with moderate-certainty evidence for minimal reductions in sleepiness. Changes in shift duration and compression of workweeks had no effect on sleep or sleepiness, but the evidence was of very low-certainty. No evidence is available for other shift schedule changes. There is a need for more high-quality studies (preferably RCTs) for all shift schedule interventions to draw conclusions on the effects of shift schedule adaptations on sleep and sleepiness in shift workers.

Post-operative Monitoring for Head and Neck Microvascular Reconstruction in the Era of Resident Duty Hour Restrictions: A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing 2 Monitoring Protocols

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether 2 different methods of post-operative head and neck free flap monitoring affect flap failure and complication rates.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 803 free flaps performed for head and neck reconstruction by the same microvascular surgeon between July 2013 and July 2020 at 2 separate hospitals within the same healthcare system. Four-hundred ten free flaps (51%) were performed at Hospital A, a medical center where flap checks were performed at frequent, scheduled intervals by in-house resident physicians and nurses; 393 free flaps (49%) were performed at Hospital B, a medical center where flap checks were performed regularly by nursing staff with resident physician evaluation as needed. Total free flap failure, partial free flap failure, and complications (consisting of wound infection, fistula, and reoperation within 1 month) were assessed.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between Hospitals A and B when comparing rates of total free flap failure, partial free flap failure, complication, or re-operation (P = .27, P = .66, P = .65, P = .29, respectively). There were no significant differences in urgent re-operation rates for flap compromise secondary to thrombosis and hematoma (P = .54).

CONCLUSIONS

In our series, free flap outcomes did not vary based on the degree of flap monitoring by resident physicians. This data supports the ability of a high-volume, well-trained, nursing-led flap monitoring program to detect flap compromise in an efficient fashion while limiting resident physician obligations in the age of resident duty hour restrictions.

Making the Financial Case for Surgical Resident Well-being: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a scoping review of literature on financial implications of surgical resident well-being.

BACKGROUND

Surgeon well-being affects clinical outcomes, patient experience, and health care economics. However, our understanding of the relationship between surgical resident well-being and organizational finances is limited.

METHODS

Authors searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase with no date or language restrictions. Searches of the gray literature included hand references of articles selected for data extraction and reviewing conference abstracts from Embase. Two reviewers screened articles for eligibility based on title and abstract then reviewed eligible articles in their entirety. Data were extracted and analyzed using conventional content analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-five articles were included, 5 (20%) published between 2003 and 2010, 12 (48%) between 2011 and 2018, and 8 (32%) between 2019 and 2021. One (4%) had an aim directly related to the research question, but financial implications were not considered from the institutional perspective. All others explored factors impacting well-being or workplace sequelae of well-being, but the economics of these elements were not the primary focus. Analysis of content surrounding financial considerations of resident well-being revealed 5 categories; however, no articles provided a comprehensive business case for investing in resident well-being from the institutional perspective.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the number of publications identified through the present scoping review is relatively small, the emergence of publications referencing economic issues associated with surgical resident well-being may suggest a growing recognition of this area's importance. This scoping review highlights a gap in the literature, which should be addressed to drive the system-level change needed to improve surgical resident well-being.

Evaluating the Impact of ACGME Resident Duty Hour Restrictions on Patient Outcomes for Bilateral Breast Reductions

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) implemented duty-hour restrictions limiting residents to 80 hours per week in 2003 and further extended restrictions in 2011 to improve resident and patient well-being. Numerous studies have examined the effects of these restrictions on patient outcomes with inconclusive results. Few efforts have been made to examine the impact of this reform on the safety of common plastic surgery procedures. This study seeks to assess the influence of ACGME duty-hour restrictions on patient outcomes, using bilateral breast reduction mammoplasty as a marker for resident involvement and operative autonomy.

Methods

Bilateral breast reductions performed in the 3 years before and after each reform were collected from the National Inpatient Sample database: pre-duty hours (2000-2002), duty hours (2006-2008), and extended duty hours (2012-2014). Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to investigate the association between ACGME duty hour restrictions on medical and surgical complications.

Results

Overall, 19,423 bilateral breast reductions were identified. Medical and surgical complication rates in these patients increased with each successive iteration of duty hour restrictions (P < 0.001). The 2003 duty-hour restriction independently associated with increased surgical (OR = 1.51, P < 0.001) and medical complications (OR = 1.85, P < 0.001). The 2011 extended duty-hour restriction was independently associated with increased surgical complications (OR = 1.39, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

ACGME duty-hour restrictions do not seem associated with better patient outcomes for bilateral breast reduction although there are multiple factors involved. These considerations and consequences should be considered in decisions that affect resident quality of life, education, and patient safety.

National improvements in resident physician-reported patient safety after limiting first-year resident physicians' extended duration work shifts: a pooled analysis of prospective cohort studies

BACKGROUND

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) enacted a policy in 2011 that restricted first-year resident physicians in the USA to work no more than 16 consecutive hours. This was rescinded in 2017.

METHODS

We conducted a nationwide prospective cohort study of resident physicians for 5 academic years (2002-2007) before and for 3 academic years (2014-2017) after implementation of the 16 hours 2011 ACGME work-hour limit. Our analyses compare trends in resident physician-reported medical errors between the two cohorts to evaluate the impact of this policy change.

RESULTS

14 796 residents provided data describing 78 101 months of direct patient care. After adjustment for potential confounders, the work-hour policy was associated with a 32% reduced risk of resident physician-reported significant medical errors (rate ratio (RR) 0.68; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.72), a 34% reduced risk of reported preventable adverse events (RR 0.66; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.74) and a 63% reduced risk of reported medical errors resulting in patient death (RR 0.37; 95% CI 0.28 to 0.49).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings have broad relevance for those who work in and receive care from academic hospitals in the USA. The decision to lift this work hour policy in 2017 may expose patients to preventable harm.

Quantification of Internal Medicine Resident Inpatient Care Using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination Database

Objective Quantification of patient encounters during internal medicine residency training is challenging. At present, there are no established strategies for evaluating the whole inpatient experience in Japan. We hypothesized that the Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) database, which is widely used in Japan, might be a useful tool for such an evaluation. Methods We analyzed DPC-based patient encounters of five senior residents with different types of training. One of the diseases on receipt computation data, including the four main diseases and at most eight comorbidities, was matched with each category in the Online system for Standardized Log of Evaluation and Registration of specialty training system (J-OSLER), and the match ratios were assessed. The accumulation of each disease classified into J-OSLER categories was also assessed. Monthly extra working hours and total patient-days per resident were evaluated using a Pearson correlation analysis. Results Two residents with two-year rotations in the general internal medicine department showed high numbers of patient encounters and the highest matching ratio with J-OSLER (approximately 60% with 4 major diseases, 91% with all diseases). There was a moderately positive correlation between the total patient-days and extra working hours in these residents, but no such correlation was noted in the rate of monthly patient encounters and extra working hours among residents as a whole. Conclusion The DPC-based quantification of patient encounters during residency training appears effective in evaluating the coverage of the current J-OSLER list. Owing to its wide availability and generalization, this matching method may be useful as a universal tool for assessing internal medicine programs.

Influence of medical trainee sleep pattern (chronotype) on burn-out and satisfaction with work schedules: a multicentre observational study

BACKGROUND

Medical trainees' work schedule is designed to cover duties without consideration of differences in circadian rhythms during a 24-hour period (chronotype).

OBJECTIVE

To explore chronotype variation among medical trainees and understand its association with burn-out and schedule satisfaction.

METHODS

In a multicentre observational study, we conducted two surveys between 1 October 2018 and 1 April 2019. Trainees from nine centres across the USA participated. We measured burn-out using Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), and trainee chronotype using the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ).

RESULTS

324 (32%) out of 1012 responded to our survey. Participants were 51% female and had a mean age of 30.8 years. Most participants had an intermediate MEQ type (65%). A large proportion of participants had burn-out on at least one of three tested MBI scales (62%); 5% of participants had burn-out on all three MBI scales. More participants with evening MEQ type had burn-out (66%) compared with morning MEQ type (55%), however, the results were not statically significant (p=0.294). Overall satisfaction with work shifts was 6.5 (95% CI 6.3 to 6.7), with higher satisfaction with day shift 7.7 (95% CI 7.5 to 7.9) and lowest satisfaction with overnight 24-hour call 3.5 (95% CI 3.2 to 3.9). Satisfaction was lower in trainees with burn-out 6.0 (95% CI 5.7 to 6.4), (p<0.001). In the follow-up survey, burn-out was present in at least one scale in 64% compared with 60% of respondents in the initial survey.

CONCLUSION

Burn-out is prevalent among medical trainees. Improving alignment between trainee preferences may improve performance, reduce human errors and burn-out.

Implementation and validation of a competency assessment tool for laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

Achieving proficiency in a surgical procedure is a milestone in the career of a trainee. We introduced a competency assessment tool for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in our residency program. Our aim was to assess the inter-rater reliability of this tool.

METHODS

We included all laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed by residents under the supervision of board certified surgeons. All residents were assessed at the end of the procedure by the supervising surgeon (live reviewer) using our competency assessment tool. Video records of the same procedure were analyzed by two independent reviewers (reviewer A and B), who were blinded to the performing trainee's. The assessment had three parts: a laparoscopic cholecystectomy-specific assessment tool (LCAT), the objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) and a 5-item visual analogue scale (VAS) to address the surgeon's autonomy in each part of the cholecystectomy. We compared the assessment scores of the live supervising surgeon and the video reviewers.

RESULTS

We included 15 junior residents who performed 42 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Scoring results from live and video reviewer were comparable except for the OSATS and VAS part. The score for OSATS by the live reviewer and reviewer B were 3.68 vs. 4.26 respectively (p = 0.04) and for VAS (5.17 vs. 4.63 respectively (p = 0.03). The same difference was found between reviewers A and B with OSATS score (3.75 vs. 4.26 respectively (p = 0.001)) and VAS (5.56 vs. 4.63 respectively; p = 0.004)).

CONCLUSION

Our competency assessment tool for the evaluation of surgical skills specific to laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been shown to be objective and comparable in-between raters during live procedure or on video material.

Impact of Extended Duty Hours on Perceptions of Care and Objective Patient Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

In 2017, interns were permitted to work continuously for up to 28 hours at a time, a reversal from the previously mandated 16-hour limit. Our objective was to evaluate perceptions of care and patient outcomes on an extended (28-hour) compared with a limited (16-hour) duty-hour system on identical interdisciplinary teams.

METHODS

Sixty-two interns, 27 residents, 28 attendings, and 449 patients participated. Patients completed surveys assessing their satisfaction. Anonymous weekly surveys were obtained from interns, residents, and attendings evaluating perceptions of intern tiredness, overall satisfaction, and performance. Nursing surveys evaluated intern and medical team performance. Objective outcome measures, including intensive care unit transfers, length of stay, readmissions, mortality, and complications, were assessed through a retrospective, blinded chart review.

RESULTS

Patients reported similar satisfaction in care. Extended duty-hour interns reported significantly decreased familiarity with their patients, decreased ability to conduct physical exams on new patients, increased tiredness, and decreased overall satisfaction. Residents overseeing extended-duty interns reported significantly decreased quality in intern presentations and overall quality of teaching, and increased perception of intern tiredness and increased incorrect orders. Attending physicians reported significantly improved quality of new patient presentations by extended duty-hour interns. No significant differences in patient objective outcome measures were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Extended intern duty hours do not affect patient's satisfaction with their care. Although interns in the extended duty-hour system reported significantly increased fatigue and decreased overall satisfaction and residents' perceived increases in incorrect intern orders in the extended duty-hour system, there were no detrimental effects on patient safety.

Quality Improvement in Neurocritical Care: a Review of the Current Landscape and Best Practices

Purpose of Review

The field of neurocritical care (NCC) has grown such that there is now a substantial body of literature on quality improvement specific to NCC. This review will discuss the development of this literature over time and highlight current best practices with practical tips for providers.

Recent Findings

There is tremendous variability in patient care models for NCC patients, despite evidence showing that certain structural elements are associated with better outcomes. There now also exist evidence-based recommendations for neurocritical care unit (NCCU) structure and processes, as well as NCC-specific performance measure (PM) sets; however, awareness of these is variable among care providers. The evidence-based literature on NCC structure, staffing, training, standardized order sets and bundles, transitions of care including handoff, prevention of bounce backs, bed flow optimization, and inter-hospital transfers is growing and offers many examples of successful performance improvement initiatives in NCCUs.

Summary

NCC providers care for patients with life-threatening conditions like intracerebral and subarachnoid hemorrhages, ischemic stroke, and traumatic brain injury, which are associated with high morbidity, complexity of treatment, and cost. Quality improvement initiatives have been successful in improving many aspects of NCC patient care, and NCC providers should continue to update and standardize their practices with consideration of this data. More research is needed to continue to identify high-risk and high-cost NCCU structures and processes and strategies to optimize them, validate current NCC PMs, and encourage clinical adoption of those that prove to be associated with improved outcomes.

Can Incoming Interns Be Entrusted to Recognize Medical Emergencies? Implementation of a Vignette-Based Cross-Cover Assessment

BACKGROUND

Interns must recognize urgent clinical situations and know when to seek assistance. However, assessing this skill is challenging.

OBJECTIVE

We explored whether graduating medical students could determine urgency of medical cross-cover scenarios and what factors were associated with this ability.

METHODS

Sixty senior medical students enrolled in an internal medicine residency preparation course, and 28 experts were invited to take an assessment using 4 clinical vignette handoffs, each with 5 to 6 cross-cover scenarios. Respondents were asked whether they would evaluate the patient at bedside and notify their supervising resident. They were asked to rate their comfort managing the scenario, rate the urgency (1=low, 2=moderate, 3=high), and take a medical knowledge quiz. Student performance was categorized based on stratification of clinical urgency-those who underestimated (fourth quartile), accurately estimated (second and third quartile), and overestimated (first quartile) urgency. We examined differences between groups in medical knowledge, action, and confidence using analysis of variance and post-hoc Tukey Honestly Significant Difference test.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight students (96.7%) and 22 experts (78.6%) participated. Clear differentiation emerged between students' ability to estimate urgency on the 3-point urgency scale (lowest quartile: 2.15±0.11; mid-quartiles: 2.38±0.07; upper quartile: 2.61±0.10, respectively). Students who underestimated urgency were less likely to notify their supervising resident (P=.001) and less likely to evaluate a patient at bedside (P=.01). There was no difference in quiz score or comfort level.

CONCLUSIONS

Incoming interns vary in their abilities to recognize urgent scenarios, independent of medical knowledge and confidence.

Well-Being Intervention in General Surgery: Multicenter Study of Program Director and Resident Perspectives

BACKGROUND

Physician well-being is critical for optimal care, but rates of psychological distress among surgical trainees are rising. Although numerous efforts have been made, the perceived efficacy of well-being interventions is not well understood.

STUDY DESIGN

This qualitative thematic study included online questionnaires to Program Directors (PDs) and residents at 16 ACGME-accredited General Surgery residency programs. PDs reported active well-being interventions for surgical residents or those under consideration at their institutions. Residents shared perspectives of available well-being interventions through open-ended responses. Conventional content analysis was used to analyze responses.

RESULTS

Fifteen PDs, or their proxies (94% response rate), responded. Responses revealed that a majority of available well-being interventions are focused on changing the individual experience rather than the underlying workplace. PD decision-making around well-being interventions is often not based on objective data. Three hundred residents (34% response rate) responded. Of available interventions, those that increase control (eg advanced and flexible scheduling), increase support (eg mentorship), and decrease demand (eg work hour limits) were consistently identified as beneficial, but interventions perceived to increase demand (eg held during unprotected time) were consistently identified as not beneficial. Group social activities, cognitive skills training, and well-being committees were variably seen as beneficial (increasing support) or not (increasing demand).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings underscore the prevalence of individual-based well-being interventions and the paucity of system-level changes. This may explain, in part, the persistence of distress among residents despite abundant effort, highlighting the imperative for system-level transformation.

Standardized Change-of-Shift Handoff: Nurses' Perspectives and Implications for Evidence-Based Practice

BACKGROUND

Nursing handoff is a communication activity with a high risk for loss or omission of information. Efforts to improve handoffs include standardization of the processes and content of handoff communications.

OBJECTIVES

To examine nurses' perspectives on the structure and organization of change-of-shift handoffs.

METHODS

A qualitative descriptive approach was used to conduct a secondary analysis of focus group data. Thirty-four nurses from 4 critical care units participated in focus groups.

RESULTS

Three themes emerged: handoff elements are defined by practice and culture; a clear, consistent, identified structure supports handoff; and personal preferences can disrupt handoff.

CONCLUSIONS

A standardized approach to handoff based on unit and organizational needs will be more successful than a broad mandate of content and organization. Individual preference is prevalent and strongly influences the information conveyed and the structure of handoff communication.

Assessing Resident Impact on Surgical Outcomes in Below-the-Knee Amputations Based on Operative Autonomy

BACKGROUND

Gradual increases in resident autonomy with attending physician oversight is crucial to developing safe and competent surgeons¹. The Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP) follows surgical outcomes within the VA. We set forth to examine the VASQIP database to compare outcomes between resident independent cases and nonindependent cases during below-the-knee amputations (BKA).

METHODS

All VASQIP records for BKA from 2000 to 2020 were examined and categorized based on whether the attending was scrubbed during the case. Case matching was performed based on preoperative comorbidities; 30-day postoperative outcomes, including a return to the operating room, wound infection, and mortality, were assessed in addition to operative time, hospital length of stay, and transfusion requirements. Student's t-test and Fisher's Exact Test were utilized.

RESULTS

A total of 13,208 BKA VASQIP records were obtained. After case control matching, 2,688 cases remained. Cases were identified with the attending surgeon noted as being scrubbed during the case (n = 1,344), or not scrubbed (n = 1,344). Patients were similar in comorbidities across both groups. No statistically significant difference in operative time (1.52 hr ± 0.78 vs. 1.47 hr ± 0.75, P = 0.08), 30-day mortality (3.3% vs. 4.8%, P = 0.05), or complication rate (19.5% vs. 21.3%, P = 0.25). Resident independent cases were noted to have slightly longer postop length of stay (12.47 days ± 12.69 vs. 15.33 days ± 20.56, P < 0.01) and operative bleeding requiring more than 4 units transfused (0.3% vs. 1.3%, P ≤ 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Resident independent operating during below-the-knee amputation at VA hospitals is associated with an increased length of stay and blood transfusion. There was no statistically significant increase in operative time, 30-day mortality, or total complication rate. Further research is required to assess the risks associated with surgical training, resident supervision, and resident preparedness for independent practice.

Sleep patterns, fatigue, and working hours among veterinary house officers: a cross-sectional survey study

OBJECTIVE

To describe the sleep patterns, working hours, and perceptions of fatigue among veterinary house officers and to identify potential areas for targeted intervention to improve well-being.

SAMPLE

303 house officers.

PROCEDURES

A 62-item questionnaire was generated by use of an online platform and sent to veterinary house officers at participating institutions via email. Responses were analyzed for trends and associations between variables of interest.

RESULTS

The mean age of respondents was 30 ± 3.7 years. Participants included 239 residents and 64 interns. House officers slept significantly less during times when they had clinical responsibilities compared to off-clinic time (6.0 hours vs 7.5 hours, respectively; P < 0.01). The majority of house officers reported working 11 to 13 hours on a typical weekday (58% [174/302]), and 32% reported clinical responsibilities 7 d/wk. Working hours were negatively related to sleep quantity (Pearson correlation coefficient, −0.54; P < 0.01), and perceived sleep quality was worse when on call (P < 0.01). The majority of house officers felt that fatigue negatively interfered with their technical skills, clinical judgment, and ability to empathize to some extent in the previous 4 weeks.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Most house officers fail to obtain sufficient sleep for optimal cognitive function and physical and mental health. Working hours and on call may be important factors contributing to the sleep patterns of veterinary house officers, and training program structure should be critically evaluated to promote protected time for sleep.

Performance Nutrition for Physician Trainees Working Overnight Shifts: A Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

To compare acute effects of 2 dietary interventions with usual dietary habits on physician trainees' alertness during overnight shifts.

METHOD

This registered, controlled, block randomized crossover trial (NCT03698123) was conducted between October 2018 and May 2019 at Stanford Medicine. Physician trainees working at least 3 overnight shifts during a 1-week period were recruited. During the first night, participants followed their usual dietary habits. During the intervention nights (low carbohydrate-to-protein ratio and high carbohydrate-to-protein ratio interventions), participants received healthy dinners, snacks, water, and, upon request, caffeinated beverages, at the beginning of their shifts and were instructed to eat meals before 10 pm. The sequence of interventions on the second and third nights were block randomized across study weeks. Outcome measures (a priori) were overnight changes in validated measures of specific neurobehavioral dimensions: psychomotor vigilance, sensory-motor speed, working memory, and risk decision making, as well as self-reported sleepiness and work exhaustion.

RESULTS

Sixty-one physician trainees participated in this study. Compared with usual dietary habits, overnight changes in psychomotor vigilance scores (scale 0-1,000) improved by 51.02 points (95% CI: 12.08, 89.96) and sleepiness (scale 1-7) improved by 0.69 points (95% CI: 0.33, 1.05) under the low carbohydrate-to-protein ratio intervention. Compared with usual dietary habits, overnight changes in sleepiness (scale 1-7) improved by 0.61 points (95% CI: 0.25, 0.96) under the high carbohydrate-to-protein ratio intervention. Neither intervention had beneficial effects relative to usual dietary habits with respect to sensory-motor speed, working memory, risk decision making, or work exhaustion. There were no differences in outcomes between low carbohydrate-to-protein ratio and high carbohydrate-to-protein ratio interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

Dietary interventions may mitigate negative effects of physician trainee sleep deprivation during overnight shifts. Future studies are warranted to further examine the effectiveness of nutritional strategies on physician alertness during overnight shifts.

An innovation tournament to improve medical residency

Two large national studies of resident duty hours incidentally revealed surgical and medical resident dissatisfaction with residency training. Aiming for an inclusive and democratic approach to improve graduate medical education, we conducted a national innovation tournament–reaching out to the program directors of all 474 US internal medicine residency programs to invite them and their residents and associate program directors to participate. Participants could submit multiple ideas as individuals or teams in four domains: [1] resident well-being and personal and professional development; [2] resident education and clinical preparedness; [3] resident sleep and alertness; and [4] patient safety. Residents and program directors were reinvited to rate ideas, whether they had submitted ideas themselves or not. We used a schedule of lottery-based prizes to stimulate the submission and rating of ideas and encourage engagement. 164 residents and program directors from 51 different programs submitted 328 ideas. 153 residents and program directors from 48 different programs submitted 15,345 ratings of ideas. Winning ideas aimed to reduce residents’ work burden or improve their mental health, sleep, eating, or relaxation or reflected technical fixes to the operations of residency, such as changing vacation schedules and the timing of pay. The results of this tournament provided actionable suggestions to improve residency training now being tested in our own residency programs. Innovation tournaments drive engagement and generate value by their opportunities for inclusion and by shifting problem solving to the end user.

Development of Entrustable Professional Activity, Core Competencies, and Guidelines in 2021 Radiology Competency Education Project

급변하고 있는 의료환경에서 전공의에게 양질의 수련을 제공하기 위해 연차별 수련교과과정을 역량 중심으로 개선하고, 수련병원이 수련에 적합한 환경을 유지하도록 하는 것은 매우 중요하다. 대한영상의학회는 그동안 수련체계 개선을 꾸준히 진행해 왔고, 전공의 역량평가와 지도전문의의 내용을 강화하여 역량 중심 전공의 수련체계 개선을 제시하였다. 현재 대한영상의학회는 2021년 7월 제2차 연차별 수련교과과정 체계화 구축 사업에 선정되어 구축 사업을 추진하고 있으며, 구축 사업에서 요구하는 위임가능 전문직무와 핵심역량 평가항목 및 평가 가이드라인을 개발하였다. 이에 대한 개발과정과 평가항목 및 평가 가이드라인을 소개하여 전공의와 지도전문의들에게 정보를 제공하고자 한다.

The role of virtual reality simulation in surgical training in the light of COVID-19 pandemic: Visual spatial ability as a predictor for improved surgical performance: a randomized trial

INTRODUCTION

Due to the current COVID-19 pandemic, surgical training has become increasingly challenging due to required social distancing. Therefore, the use of virtual reality (VR)-simulation could be a helpful tool for imparting surgical skills, especially in minimally invasive environments. Visual spatial ability (VSA) might influence the learning curve for laparoscopic surgical skills. However, little is known about the influence of VSA for surgical novices on VR-simulator training regarding the complexity of different tasks over a long-term training period. Our study evaluated prior VSA and VSA development in surgical trainees during VR-simulator training, and its influence on surgical performance in simulator training.

METHODS

In our single-center prospective two-arm randomized trial, VSA was measured with a tube figure test before curriculum training. After 1:1 randomization, the training group (TG) participated in the entire curriculum training consisting of 48 different VR-simulator tasks with varying difficulty over a continuous nine-day training session. The control group (CG) performed two of these tasks on day 1 and 9. Correlation and regression analyses were used to assess the influence of VSA on VR-related surgical skills and to measure procedural abilities.

RESULTS

Sixty students (33 women) were included. Significant improvements in the TG in surgical performance and faster completion times were observed from days 1 to 9 for the scope orientation 30° right-handed (SOR), and cholecystectomy dissection tasks after the structured 9-day training program. After training, the TG with pre-existing low VSA scores achieved performance levels similar to those with pre-existing high VSA scores for the two VR simulator tasks. Significant correlations between VSA and surgical performance on complex laparoscopic camera navigation SOR tasks were found before training.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed that that all trainees improved their surgical skills irrespective of previous VSA during structured VR simulator training. An increase in VSA resulted in improvements in surgical performance and training progress, which was more distinct in complex simulator tasks. Further, we demonstrated a positive relationship between VSA and surgical performance of the TG, especially at the beginning of training. Our results identified pre-existing levels of VSA as a predictor of surgical performance.

The Impact of Resident Holdover Admissions on Length of Hospital Stay and Risk of Transfer to an Intensive Care Unit

OBJECTIVE

Implementation of residency duty hour standards has led to adoption of different staffing models, such as the "holdover" model, whereby nighttime teams admit patients and transfer their care to daytime teams who provide ongoing care. In contrast, nonholdover teams at our institution are responsible for both admitting patients and providing ongoing care. We sought to determine whether patients admitted by holdover teams experience worse outcomes than those admitted by nonholdover teams.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to the internal medicine hospital service at a quaternary care hospital from July 2013 to June 2015. Primary outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS) and transfer to an intensive care unit within 72 hours of admission. Secondary outcomes were any transfer to an intensive care unit, in-hospital mortality, discharge to home (versus discharge to postacute care facility), and readmission to the health system within 30 days of discharge.

RESULTS

We analyzed 5518 encounters, 64% of which were admitted by a holdover team. Outcomes were similar between study groups, except the LOS, which was 5.5 hours longer for holdover encounters in unadjusted analyses (5.18 versus 4.95 days, P = 0.04) but not significantly different in adjusted analyses. The mean discharge time was 4:00 p.m. for both groups, whereas the mean admission times were 12:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. for holdover and nonholdover encounters, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Holdover encounters at our institution were not associated with worse patient safety outcomes. A small increase in LOS may have been attributable to holdover patients having earlier admission and identical discharge times.

Smart-phone Based Geofencing: A Novel Approach to Monitoring Clinical Work Hours in Surgery Residency

OBJECTIVE

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education specifies strict requirements for clinical work hours during residency training, with serious consequences for violations. Self-reporting of work hours by trainees can be inaccurate due to recall bias, giving program directors limited data to influence change. We aimed to assess the impact of a smart-phone based geofencing application on submission rates for work hours and reported violations in a general surgery residency program at a university-based medical center. We also examined resident perceptions surrounding implementation and use of the application.

METHODS

We compared clinical work hours submitted and violations reported during the pilot period (October-November 2019) with the months prior to the launch of the application (July-August 2019). PGY1 and PGY2 residents were eligible to use the application during and after this pilot period. Semi-structured interviews were used to assess resident perceptions. A retrospective review was conducted to compare reporting during the same time period from the prior academic year (2018-2019) for historical reference. Paired t-tests were used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Twenty-six residents (15 PGY1, 11 PGY2) were eligible for the intervention and 23 residents (88%) used the application. The mean number of violations reported decreased significantly during the pilot period compared with the months prior to the intervention (4.5 vs. 11, p = 0.04). The total rate of submissions was not significantly different after the intervention (85% vs. 82%, p = 0.42). The PGY1 mean submission rate decreased during the pilot period (91%-75%, p = 0.21) while the PGY2 submission rate increased (77%-91%, p = 0.07). Compared with historical data, there was an increase in overall total submission rates between academic years 2018/2019 and 2019/2020 (74% vs. 79%, p = 0.047) and an associated decrease in the mean number of monthly violations (14 vs. 6.25, p = 0.004). Thirteen (50%) residents (8 PGY1, 5 PGY2) volunteered for semi-structured interviews. Most participants found the application useful for recording and reporting clinical work hours. They noted an ease in the administrative burden as well as more accurate reporting associated with automated logging. Use of the application was not perceived to limit engagement with patient care; however, there were privacy concerns and some technical barriers were identified. The messaging regarding the application's use was identified as critical for implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

The "real-time" data provided by a geofencing application in our program helped to reduce the number of work-hour violations reported and did not diminish resident engagement with patient care. Decreasing the administrative burden of recording work hours coupled with improving transparency and accuracy of submissions may be important mechanisms.

Resident self-assessment of common endocrine procedures

BACKGROUND

General surgery residency graduates are expected to be proficient in straightforward endocrine operations. This study aimed to elucidate residents' self-assessment of their ability to perform common endocrine procedures.

METHODS

A fourteen-question survey was emailed to general surgery residents from seven U.S. residency programs regarding their self-assessed ability to perform each step of a straightforward thyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy. Demographics and perceived ability to perform the various procedures were collected.

RESULTS

A minority of respondents (17, 27.9%) agreed they could complete a straightforward thyroidectomy for benign disease, with only 11.7% (n = 7) agreeing they could complete a straightforward thyroidectomy for malignant disease. 26.2% (n = 16) of respondents agreed they could complete a straightforward parathyroidectomy. Completed number of cases was significantly associated with greater self-assessed ability to perform the endocrine operations (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Most general surgery residents surveyed did not feel capable of performing common, straightforward endocrine procedures. Although confidence in operative ability increased with PGY-level and number of cases completed, the majority of PGY-5 residents still did not feel able to perform a thyroidectomy for malignant disease unassisted.

Sleep and Alertness Among Interns in Intensive Care Compared to General Medicine Rotations: A Secondary Analysis of the iCOMPARE Trial

BACKGROUND

Medical interns are at risk for sleep deprivation from long and often rotating work schedules. However, the effects of specific rotations on sleep are less clear.

OBJECTIVE

To examine differences in sleep duration and alertness among internal medicine interns during inpatient intensive care unit (ICU) compared to general medicine (GM) rotations.

METHODS

This secondary analysis compared interns during a GM or ICU rotation from a randomized trial (2015-2016) of 12 internal medicine residency programs assigned to different work hour limit policies (standard 16-hour shifts or no shift-length limits). The primary outcome was sleep duration/24-hour using continuous wrist actigraphy over a 13-day period. Secondary outcomes assessed each morning during the concomitant actigraphy period were sleepiness (Karolinska Sleepiness Scale [KSS]), alertness (number of Brief Psychomotor Vigilance Test [PVT-B] lapses), and self-report of excessive sleepiness over past 24 hours. Linear mixed-effect models with random program intercept determined associations between each outcome by rotation, controlling for age, sex, and work hour policy followed.

RESULTS

Of 398 interns, 386 were included (n = 261 GM, n = 125 ICU). Average sleep duration was 7.00±0.08h and 6.84±0.10h, and number of PVT lapses were 5.5±0.5 and 5.7±0.7 for GM and ICU, respectively (all P > .05). KSS was 4.8±0.1 for both rotations. Compared to GM, ICU interns reported more days of excessive sleepiness from 12am-6am (2.6 vs 1.7, P < .001) and 6am-12pm (2.6 vs 1.9, P = .013) and had higher percent of days with sleep duration < 6 hours (27.6% vs 23.4%, P < .001). GM interns reported more days with no excessive sleepiness (5.3 vs 3.7, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite ICU interns reporting more excessive sleepiness in morning hours and more days of insufficient sleep (<6 hours), overall sleep duration and alertness did not significantly differ between rotations.

Improving the neonatal team handoff process in a level IV NICU: reducing interruptions and handoff duration

Background

Neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) patients are at increased risk for handoff communication failures due to complexity and prolonged length of stay. We report a quality initiative aimed at reducing avoidable interruptions during neonatal handoffs while monitoring handoff duration and provider satisfaction.

Methods

Observational time series between August 2015 and March 2018 in an academic level IV NICU. NICU I-PASS and process changes were implemented using plan–do–study–act cycle, and statistical process control charts were used in the analysis. Unmatched preintervention and postintervention satisfaction surveys were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests.

Results

There was special cause variation in the mean number of avoidable interruptions per handoff from 4 to 0.3 (92% reduction). The mean duration of handoff was reduced ~1 min/patient. Provider satisfaction with the quality of handoffs also improved from a mean of 3.36 to 3.75 on a 1–5 Likert scale (p=0.049).

Conclusions

Standardisation of NICU handoff with NICU I-PASS and process changes led to the sustained reduction in avoidable interruptions with the added benefit of reduced handoff length and improved provider satisfaction.

Preoperative Briefings and Postoperative Debriefings to Increase Resident Operative Autonomy and Performance

OBJECTIVE

To implement the use of standardized preoperative briefings and postoperative debriefings for surgical cases involving residents in an effort to improve resident autonomy and skill acquisition.

DESIGN

Prospective longitudinal study.

SETTING

Johns Hopkins Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

PARTICIPANTS

Resident and attending physicians.

RESULTS

Joint Huddles for Improving Resident Education (JHFIRE) tool was created and successfully implemented by 19 residents and 17 faculty members. Over the course of three data collection periods spanning an academic year, overall scores improved though not statistically significantly in the metrics of Zwisch autonomy, Resident Performance, and Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) scores. Female residents were scored significantly higher by attendings than their male counterparts in the assessment of baseline Resident Performance.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) JHFIRE tool implemented a standardized preoperative briefing and postoperative debriefing to improve communication and resident skill acquisition; (2) The tool was accepted and utilized throughout an academic year; (3) Zwisch, Resident Performance, and OSATS scores improved though not significantly.

Neurosurgery residency and fellowship education in the United States: 2 decades of system development by the One Neurosurgery Summit organizations

The purpose of this report is to chronicle a 2-decade period of educational innovation and improvement, as well as governance reform, across the specialty of neurological surgery. Neurological surgery educational and professional governance systems have evolved substantially over the past 2 decades with the goal of improving training outcomes, patient safety, and the quality of US neurosurgical care. Innovations during this period have included the following: creating a consensus national curriculum; standardizing the length and structure of neurosurgical training; introducing educational outcomes milestones and required case minimums; establishing national skills, safety, and professionalism courses; systematically accrediting subspecialty fellowships; expanding professional development for educators; promoting training in research; and coordinating policy and strategy through the cooperation of national stakeholder organizations. A series of education summits held between 2007 and 2009 restructured some aspects of neurosurgical residency training. Since 2010, ongoing meetings of the One Neurosurgery Summit have provided strategic coordination for specialty definition, neurosurgical education, public policy, and governance. The Summit now includes leadership representatives from the Society of Neurological Surgeons, the American Association of Neurological Surgeons, the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, the American Board of Neurological Surgery, the Review Committee for Neurological Surgery of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, the American Academy of Neurological Surgery, and the AANS/CNS Joint Washington Committee. Together, these organizations have increased the effectiveness and efficiency of the specialty of neurosurgery in advancing educational best practices, aligning policymaking, and coordinating strategic planning in order to meet the highest standards of professionalism and promote public health.

The Role of Preoperative Briefing and Postoperative Debriefing in Surgical Education

OBJECTIVE

To study the impact of a new preoperative briefing and postoperative debriefing tool on the perceived quality of surgical education and to assess attitudes of residents and attendings regarding this tool.

DESIGN

Surrounding introduction and use of the tool (JHFIRE: Joint Huddles for Improving Resident Education), perceived quality of surgical education was assessed with pre- and postintervention System for Evaluation of Teaching Qualities (SETQ) surveys. Additionally, a postintervention Likert survey regarding the JHFIRE tool itself was completed by residents and faculty.

SETTING

Johns Hopkins University Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, a tertiary care academic institution.

PARTICIPANTS

All residents and attendings who used the tool were invited to participate. 40 participants (13 residents, 27 attendings) completed the preintervention SETQ. 11 participants (3 residents, 7 attendings, 1 unspecified) completed the postintervention SETQ. For postintervention qualitative assessment of the tool itself, 12 participants (3 residents, 7 attendings, 2 unspecified) provided feedback.

RESULTS

The tool was well-received with large subjective benefit in improving resident surgical education. A total of 88% thought that the time spent on the debriefings was "just right" and 91% planned to make the debriefings a regular part of operative performance assessments. Despite this overwhelmingly positive feedback, there was no overall difference in pre- and postintervention SETQ scores for climate of surgical education in the Department (4.25 ± 0.55 vs. 4.10 ± 0.88, p = 0.63).

CONCLUSIONS

Introduction of 4 item preoperative briefing and 4 item postoperative debriefing checklists was welcomed by both residents and faculty for its ability to shape surgical education in the operating room into a guided discovery model of hands-on education. Overall SETQ scores did not change, but most participants found value in the tool and plan to continue its use.

Impact of intensive care unit admission during handover on mortality: propensity matched cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of intensive care unit admission during medical handover on mortality.

METHODS

Post-hoc analysis of data extracted from a prior study aimed at addressing the impacts of intensive care unit readmission on clinical outcomes. This retrospective, single-center, propensity-matched cohort study was conducted in a 41-bed general open-model intensive care unit. Patients were assigned to one of two cohorts according to time of intensive care unit admission: Handover Group (intensive care unit admission between 6:30 am and 7:30 am or 6:30 pm and 7:30 pm) or Control Group (intensive care unit admission between 7:31 am and 6:29 pm or 7:31 pm and 6:29 am). Patients in the Handover Group were propensity-matched to patients in the Control Group at a 1:2 ratio.

RESULTS

A total of 6,650 adult patients were admitted to the intensive care unit between June 1st 2013 and May 31st 2015. Following exclusion of non-eligible participants, 5,779 patients (389; 6.7% and 5,390; 93.3%, Handover and Control Group) were deemed eligible for propensity score matching. Of these, 1,166 were successfully matched (389; 33.4% and 777; 66.6%, Handover and Control Group). Following propensity-score matching, intensive care unit admission during handover was not associated with increased risk of intensive care unit (OR: 1.40; 95%CI: 0.92-2.11; p=0.113) or in-hospital (OR: 1.23; 95%CI: 0.85-1.75; p=0.265) mortality.

CONCLUSION

Intensive care unit admission during medical handover did not affect in-hospital mortality in this propensity-matched, single-center cohort study.

The scope of hospital medicine practice at night: a national survey of night shift hospitalists

Introduction: Although in-person hospitalist presence, increasingly staffed by dedicated nocturnists, has become the norm overnight in the hospital, the scope of nocturnist practice and typical workload has not been defined. This study examines the clinical responsibilities and patient safety perceptions of hospitalists who work night shifts in the United States.Methods: In the fall of 2019, a cross-sectional, web-based survey was administered to physician and nurse practitioner/physician assistant (NP/PA) hospitalists who work night shifts. The questionnaire assessed night staffing structure, typical responsibilities, patient volume, perceptions of safety overnight, as well as demographic information. The survey was posted on the Society of Hospital Medicine (SHM) Hospital Medicine Exchange (HMX) Online Discussion Forum. Additionally, the survey was distributed by 'snowball method' by respondents to other night hospitalists. Responses were collected anonymously.Results: Of the 167 respondents, 157 reported working night shifts. There was at least one respondent from 32 different states. In addition to performing admissions to medicine services and covering inpatients, night hospitalists cover ICU patients, participate in RRT/Code teams and procedure teams, perform consults, participate in medical education, and take outpatient calls. Across institutions, there was a large distribution in numbers of patients covered in a night shift; however, patient volume fell into typical ranges: 5-10 admissions for physicians, 0-6 admissions for NP/PAs, and 25-75 patient cross-coverage census. When physicians perform more than five admissions per night, hospitalists were less likely to agree that they could provide safe care (88% vs. 63%, p = 0.0006).Conclusions: This is the first national study to examine the clinical responsibilities of hospitalists working overnight. Overnight responsibilities are heterogeneous across institutions. As hospitals are increasingly employing nocturnists, more research is needed to guide night staffing and optimize patient safety.

Handoffs in Radiology: Minimizing Communication Errors and Improving Care Transitions

Handoffs are essential to achieving safe care transitions. In radiology practice, frequent transitions of care responsibility among clinicians, radiologists, and patients occur between moments of care such as determining protocol, imaging, interpreting, and consulting. Continuity of care is maintained across these transitions with handoffs, which are the process of communicating patient information and transferring decision-making responsibility. As a leading cause of medical error, handoffs are a major communication challenge that is exceedingly common in both diagnostic and interventional radiology practice. The frequency of handoffs in radiology underscores the importance of using evidence-based strategies to improve patient safety in the radiology department. In this article, reliability science principles and handoff improvement tools are adapted to provide radiology-focused strategies at individual, team, and organizational levels with the goal of minimizing handoff errors and improving care transitions.

Job Satisfaction Among Plastic Surgery Residents in Canada

Objective:

Resident wellness is a focus of medical training and is prioritized in both Canadian and American accreditation processes. Job satisfaction is an important component of wellness that is not examined in the literature. The purpose of this study was to analyze job satisfaction in a national sample of plastic surgery residents, and identify factors that influence satisfaction.

Methods:

We designed a cross-sectional survey adapted from existing instruments, with attention to thorough item generation and reduction as well as pilot and clinical sensibility testing. All plastic surgery residents at Canadian institutions were surveyed regarding overall job satisfaction as well as personal- and program-specific factors that may affect satisfaction. Predictors of satisfaction were identified using multivariable regression models.

Results:

The response rate was 40%. Median overall job satisfaction was 4.0 on a 5-point Likert scale. Operative experience was considered both the most important element of a training program, and the area in most need of improvement. Senior training year (P < .01), shorter commute time (P = .04), fewer duty hours (P = .02), fewer residents (P < .01), and more fellows (P < .01) were associated with significantly greater job satisfaction.

Conclusions:

This is the first study to gather cross-sectional data on job satisfaction from a national sample of plastic surgery residents. The results from this study can inform programs in making tangible changes tailored to their trainees’ needs. Moreover, our findings may be used to inform a prospectively studied targeted intervention to increase job satisfaction and resident wellness to address North American accreditation standards.