Gender affirming hormone therapy dosing behaviors among transgender and nonbinary adults

A Retrospective Cohort Study of Transgender Adolescents' Gender-Affirming Hormone Discontinuation

PURPOSE

To understand the rate of, and reasons for, discontinuation of gender-affirming hormones (GAH) in transgender adolescents.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of individuals starting GAH between January 2007 and December 2022. Individuals were included if they were diagnosed with gender dysphoria, were prescribed GAH, and took GAH continuously for a minimum of 6 months. Of 1,224 individuals who started GAH, 1,050 met the eligibility criteria for this analysis. The primary study outcome was the status of GAH use at last communication. We also assessed gender identity at the time of GAH discontinuation and reasons for discontinuation among individuals who discontinued GAH for periods of 3 months or longer.

RESULTS

Of 1,050 eligible individuals, 973 (93%) had been on GAH continuously at last contact, 20 (2%) had discontinued GAH for greater than 3 months then restarted hormones, and 37 (4%) had discontinued GAH without restarting hormones. Of those who discontinued hormones without restarting, 5 (0.5%) individuals did so because they reidentified with the gender associated with their sex assigned at birth. This represents less than 1 percent of the cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort of transgender adolescents seeking GAH, persistent discontinuation of hormones was rare and primarily reflected having accomplished gender expression goals or difficulties accessing or taking hormones - rather than individuals reaffirming a gender identity associated with their assigned sex at birth. It is important for future research on individuals who discontinue GAH to evaluate the reasons for discontinuation and not to make assumptions about detransition and/or regret.

Musculoskeletal and cardiovascular considerations for transgender athletes

OBJECTIVE

Participation in athletics is essential for the overall well-being of transgender athletes and should be included as part of gender-affirming care. Surveys show physicians and athletic trainers want to provide appropriate care for transgender athletes but lack the proper knowledge and training to do so. Gender Affirming Hormone Therapy (GAHT) is part of gender-affirming care, yet the effects of GAHT on the cardiovascular and musculoskeletal health of transgender athletes is not well-understood. The purpose of this review was to discuss important musculoskeletal and cardiovascular considerations unique to transgender athletes and improve physician understanding in caring for transgender athletes.

METHODS

A representative selection of literature on the effects of GAHT on cardiovascular and musculoskeletal health was included in this review.

RESULTS

Estrogen therapy may increase the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and stroke, and decrease blood pressure levels among transgender women, while studies on lipid profile are inconsistent among both transgender men and women. Transgender women receiving GAHT may also be at greater risk for bone fracture and ligamentous injuries.

CONCLUSION

Exercise is essential for the well-being of transgender individuals and special considerations regarding the cardiovascular and musculoskeletal health of transgender athletes should be incorporated into standard medical education. Educational programs for transgender patients and their support team should focus on preventative measures that can be taken to reduce the risk of adverse musculoskeletal and cardiovascular events. The PPE is an invaluable tool available to physicians to monitor the health and safety of transgender athletes and should be regularly updated as research on the health of transgender individuals continues to grow. Longitudinal and prospective studies should examine the effects of GAHT on the musculoskeletal and cardiovascular health of transgender athletes. Lastly, health care providers play an important role in the advancement of gender-neutral policies.

The Effects of Perioperative Gender-affirming Hormone Therapy on Facial Feminization Surgery Adverse Events, Facial Features Addressed, and Esthetic Satisfaction: A Multimodal Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Facial feminization surgery (FFS) treats gender dysphoria in transfeminine patients by addressing the facial bony and soft tissue components. Individuals seeking FFS may be taking gender-affirming hormone replacement therapy [gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT)]. This study aims to better characterize the GAHT's impact on venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk, surgical planning, and outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature were carried out to assess the effect of perioperative GAHT continuation on VTE. Cochrane Q and I2 statistics measured study heterogeneity with the following meta-regression exploring these results. Simultaneously, a retrospective review of the senior author's FFS cohort was conducted to investigate GAHT duration's impact on FFS revision rate, complication incidence, and facial structures operated on.

RESULTS

Eleven articles were included: 602 patients stopped GAHT, of whom 3 VTEs were recorded (0.49%). This is compared with one episode among the 925 who continued GAHT perioperatively (0.11%). Study heterogeneity was low (0%), but limited VTE sample size precluded meta-analytic conclusions. Gender-affirming hormone therapy duration does not impact the incidence of all-cause complications (P = 0.478), wound infection (P = 0.283), hematoma (P = 0.283), or VTE (P = 1). The only procedures significantly less associated with higher GAHT were tracheal shaving (P = 0.002) and mandibuloplasty (P = 0.003). Finally, the FFS revision rate was not associated with GAHT duration (P = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

There is a paucity of data to assess the safety or harm of continuing GAHT in the FFS perioperative period. Thus, a shared provider-patient decision-making process examining the risks and benefits of GAHT perioperative continuation is warranted. As patients seeking gender-affirming care are diverse, a "one-protocol-fits-all" is not appropriate.

Prevalence of Discrimination and the Association Between Employment Discrimination and Health Care Access and Use - National HIV Behavioral Surveillance Among Transgender Women, Seven Urban Areas, United States, 2019-2020

Transgender women experience discrimination in many settings, including in employment. Because employment and health insurance are intertwined in the United States, employment discrimination might be related to lower health insurance coverage and health care use, including gender-affirming care. This analysis used data from transgender women (N = 1,608) in seven urban areas in the United States collected during 2019-2020 to present the prevalence of six discrimination types (employment, housing, bathroom, businesses, health care, and abuse) and to measure the association between employment discrimination (defined as trouble getting a job or fired due to being transgender) and sociodemographic characteristics, health care access, and health care use. Log-linked Poisson regression models were conducted to estimate adjusted prevalence ratios and 95% CIs. Seven in 10 transgender women experienced at least one type of discrimination during the past 12 months. During the same period, 9.9% of transgender women were fired and 32.4% had trouble getting a job because of being transgender. Employment discrimination was associated with younger age and lower socioeconomic status. Having trouble getting a job was associated with health care access and health care use factors, including having no health insurance or having Medicaid only, having an unmet medical need because of cost, never having transgender-specific care, and having an unmet need for gender-affirming procedures. These findings suggest that employment discrimination contributes to transgender women's economic marginalization and their ability to obtain adequate health insurance coverage and achieve their transition goals. These findings might help guide efforts that protect transgender women's right to pursue their work, health, and life goals without discrimination.

The Utility of Preclinical Models in Understanding the Bone Health of Transgender Individuals Undergoing Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarise the evidence regarding the effects of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) on bone health in transgender people, to identify key knowledge gaps and how these gaps can be addressed using preclinical rodent models.

RECENT FINDINGS

Sex hormones play a critical role in bone physiology, yet there is a paucity of research regarding the effects of GAHT on bone microstructure and fracture risk in transgender individuals. The controlled clinical studies required to yield fracture data are unethical to conduct making clinically translatable preclinical research of the utmost importance. Novel genetic and surgical preclinical models have yielded significant mechanistic insight into the roles of sex steroids on skeletal integrity. Preclinical models of GAHT have the potential inform clinical approaches to preserve skeletal integrity and prevent fractures in transgender people undergoing GAHT. This review highlights the key considerations required to ensure the information gained from preclinical models of GAHT are informative.

Mapping Community-Engaged Implementation Strategies with Transgender Scientists, Stakeholders, and Trans-Led Community Organizations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) represents one of the most effective methods of prevention for HIV, but remains inequitable, leaving many transgender and nonbinary (trans) individuals unable to benefit from this resource. Deploying community-engaged PrEP implementation strategies for trans populations will be crucial for ending the HIV epidemic.

RECENT FINDINGS

While most PrEP studies have progressed in addressing pertinent research questions about gender-affirming care and PrEP at the biomedical and clinical levels, research on how to best implement gender-affirming PrEP systems at the social, community, and structural levels remains outstanding. The science of community-engaged implementation to build gender-affirming PrEP systems must be more fully developed. Most published PrEP studies with trans people report on outcomes rather than processes, leaving out important lessons learned about how to design, integrate, and implement PrEP in tandem with gender-affirming care. The expertise of trans scientists, stakeholders, and trans-led community organizations is essential to building gender-affirming PrEP systems.

Improving the cardiovascular health care of transgender and non-binary persons

Research consistently shows that gender-affirming practices improve markers of cardiovascular health. Consequently, the focus of the management of the cardiovascular health of transgender and non-binary populations should not be on their hormone therapies and surgical histories, but should instead be rooted in the routine screening of cardiovascular risk factors.