Incidence of Adjacent Synchronous Ipsilateral Infiltrating Carcinoma and/or Ductal Carcinoma In Situ in Patients Diagnosed with Flat Epithelial Atypia by Core Needle Biopsy (TBCRC 034)

BACKGROUND

Flat epithelial atypia (FEA), a rare breast proliferative lesion, is often diagnosed following core biopsy (CB) of mammographic microcalcifications. In the prospective multi-institution TBCRC 034 trial, we investigate the upgrade rate to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive cancer following excision for patients diagnosed with FEA on CB.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with a breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) ≤ 4 imaging abnormality and a concordant CB diagnosis of FEA were identified for excision. Upgrade rates were determined on the basis of local and central pathology review. The prespecified threshold to omit excision of FEA on CB was an upgrade rate of ≤ 3%. Sample size and confidence intervals were based on exact binomial calculation.

RESULTS

Overall, 129 patients underwent excision (median age 50 years, range 30-84 years). After local pathology review, 6/129 patients (4.7%; 95% CI 1.7-9.8%) were upgraded to invasive carcinoma (n = 3) or DCIS (n = 3) at excision. Among 116 patients with CB available for central pathology review, FEA was confirmed in 78 (67.2%, 95% CI 57.9-75.7%). Of these, only one patient was upgraded to DCIS (1.3%; 95% CI 0.03-6.9%), which was also one of the locally upgraded cases. Among the other five local upgrades, two did not have CB available for central review, two CB had ADH, and one CB had normal tissue on central review.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with FEA on CB, the upgrade rate was 4.7% based on local pathology review and 1.3% based on central pathology review. These findings highlight the importance of shared decision-making in the management of FEA.

Surgery for Classic, Pleomorphic and Non-classic Lobular Carcinoma In Situ: Surgery Rate, Risk of Upstaging and Short-Term Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

The Dutch breast cancer guideline recommends surveillance for classic lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), unless there is a discrepancy with mammographic findings, and surgery for pleomorphic and non-classic LCIS.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess adherence to the guideline in daily practice, as well as the surgery rate, risk of upstaging, and events during follow-up.

METHODS

Selection of patients from a nationwide cohort diagnosed between 2011 and 2020. Patients with a history of in situ or invasive breast cancer or concomitant atypical ductal hyperplasia were excluded. Analyses comprised univariable analysis.

RESULTS

Of 1178 diagnoses, 1018 (86%) were classic LCIS, 129 (11%) were pleomorphic LCIS, and 31 (3%) were non-classic (florid or unspecified non-classic) LCIS. Surgery was performed in 323 patients. The surgery rate for classic LCIS was 19%, 83% for pleomorphic LCIS, and 84% for non-classic LCIS. The upstage rate for both classic and pleomorphic LCIS was 32%, and 31% for non-classic LCIS. LCIS was upstaged in 103 patients (32%); 24 (7%) to DCIS and 79 (25%) to invasive breast cancer. Follow-up of the 859 non-operated patients showed fewer than 4% with ipsilateral DCIS or invasive breast cancer.

CONCLUSION

The surgery rates for classic, pleomorphic, and non-classic LCIS indicate that the guideline is well adhered to in daily practice. Given the high upstage rates and low number of subsequent DCIS and invasive breast cancer events in patients with classic LCIS, these patients appear to be well-selected for surgery versus surveillance. The results support the recommendation to operate on patients with pleomorphic/non-classic LCIS.

Long term follow-up of women treated for screen detected atypical ductal hyperplasia or lobular neoplasia in a large UK screening centre

BACKGROUND

Atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) and lobular neoplasia (LN) increase subsequent breast cancer (BC) risk. However, optimal surveillance and risk reduction regimes remain uncertain. We report management and outcomes of women with ADH and LN to provide data on potential screening/prevention strategies.

METHODS

Women diagnosed with screen detected ADH and/or LN between 2010-2018 at our institution were identified and demographic data, MDT decisions and BC diagnoses extracted from electronic patient records in 2019 and 2023.

RESULTS

Of 107 women, 74 were discharged to the NHS Breast Screening Programme and 33 were offered enhanced screening (ES). The proportion offered ES increased significantly over time (p = 0.037). 15/105 (14.3%) developed BC (median follow-up 117 months), 9 screen-detected and 6 symptomatic, with 3 interval cancers diagnosed 12-25 months following their last screen. 3/15 were lymph node positive and 13/14 invasive cancers were estrogen receptor (ER) positive. BC incidence rate was 1499.6/100,000 women/year (SIR = 4.7), lower in the first 5 years of follow-up compared with post 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

In women with ADH/LN most BCs occur beyond 5 years. ES regimens should therefore extend to at least 10 years and be at least biennial. Preventative therapy should be considered given the high BC SIR and ER positivity of subsequent tumours.

Meta-analysis: Radial Scar and Breast MRI

BACKGROUND

The implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis has increased the detection of radial scar (RS). Managing this finding may be experienced as a clinical dilemma in daily practice. Breast Contrast-Enhanced MRI (CE-BMR) is a known modality in case of problem-solving tool for mammographic abnormalities. However, the data about AD and CE-BMR are scant.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose was to estimate the benefit of CE-BMR in the setting of RS detected mammographically through a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.

METHODS

A search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were conducted in 2022. Based on the PRISMA guidelines, an analysis was performed. The primary endpoint was the correlation between CE-BMR findings and definite outcome for RS (pure RS versus RS associated with atypia or malignancy).

RESULTS

Three studies were available. The negative predictive value (NPV) was 100% for each.

CONCLUSION

The high NPV could allow for deferral of a biopsy in favor of a short-interval imaging follow-up in the setting of a negative CE-BMR.

Immediate and delayed risk of breast cancer associated with classic lobular carcinoma in situ and its variants

OBJECTIVE

To determine the risk of breast cancer due to lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS).

METHODS

This retrospective IRB-approved study identified cases of LCIS after percutaneous breast biopsy from 7/2005 to 7/2022. Excluded were cases with less than 2 years of imaging surveillance or a concurrent ipsilateral breast cancer diagnosis within 6 months of the LCIS diagnosis. Final outcomes of cancer versus no cancer were determined by pathology at surgical excision or the absence of cancer on imaging surveillance.

RESULTS

A total of 116 LCIS lesions were identified. The primary imaging findings targeted for percutaneous biopsy included calcifications (50.0%, 58/116), MR enhancing lesions (25.0%, 29/116), noncalcified mammographic architectural distortions (10.3%, 12/116), or masses (14.7%, 17/116). Surgical excision was performed in 49.1% (57/116) and imaging surveillance was performed in 50.9% (59/116) of LCIS cases. There were 22 cancers of which 11 cancers were discovered at immediate excision [19.3% (11/57) immediate upgrade] and 11 cancers developed later while on imaging surveillance [18.6% (11/59) delayed risk for cancer]. Among all 22 cancers, 63.6% (14/22) occurred at the site of LCIS (11 at immediate excision and 3 at surveillance) and 36.4% (8/22) occurred at a location away from the site of LCIS (6 in a different quadrant and 2 in the contralateral breast).

CONCLUSION

LCIS has both an immediate risk (19.3%) and a delayed risk (18.6%) for cancer with 90.9% occurring in the ipsilateral breast (63.6% at and 27.3% away from the site of LCIS) and 9.1% occurring in the contralateral breast.

Upgrade Rates of Variant Lobular Carcinoma In Situ Compared to Classic Lobular Carcinoma In Situ Diagnosed in Core Needle Biopsies: A 10-Year Single Institution Retrospective Study

The primary aim of this study was to determine the upgrade rates of variant lobular carcinoma in situ (V-LCIS, ie, combined florid [F-LCIS] and pleomorphic [P-LCIS]) compared with classic LCIS (C-LCIS) when diagnosed on core needle biopsy (CNB). The secondary goal was to determine the rate of progression/development of invasive carcinoma on long-term follow-up after primary excision. After institutional review board approval, our institutional pathology database was searched for patients with "pure" LCIS diagnosed on CNB who underwent subsequent excision. Radiologic findings were reviewed, radiologic-pathologic (rad-path) correlation was performed, and follow-up patient outcome data were obtained. One hundred twenty cases of LCIS were identified on CNB (C-LCIS = 97, F-LCIS = 18, and P-LCIS = 5). Overall upgrade rates after excision for C-LCIS, F-LCIS, and P-LCIS were 14% (14/97), 44% (8/18), and 40% (2/5), respectively. Of the total cases, 79 (66%) were deemed rad-path concordant. Of these, the upgrade rate after excision for C-LCIS, F-LCIS, and P-LCIS was 7.5% (5 of 66), 40% (4 of 10), and 0% (0 of 3), respectively. The overall upgrade rate for V-LCIS was higher than for C-LCIS (P = .004), even for the cases deemed rad-path concordant (P value: .036). Most upgraded cases (23 of 24) showed pT1a disease or lower. With an average follow-up of 83 months, invasive carcinoma in the ipsilateral breast was identified in 8/120 (7%) cases. Six patients had died: 2 of (contralateral) breast cancer and 4 of other causes. Because of a high upgrade rate, V-LCIS diagnosed on CNB should always be excised. The upgrade rate for C-LCIS (even when rad-path concordant) is higher than reported in many other studies. Rad-path concordance read, surgical consultation, and individualized decision making are recommended for C-LCIS cases. The risk of developing invasive carcinoma after LCIS diagnosis is small (7% with ∼7-year follow-up), but active surveillance is required to diagnose early-stage disease.

False-Positive and False-Negative Contrast-enhanced Mammograms: Pitfalls and Strategies to Improve Cancer Detection

Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is a relatively new breast imaging modality that uses intravenous contrast material to increase detection of breast cancer. CEM combines the structural information of conventional mammography with the functional information of tumor neovascularity. Initial studies have demonstrated that CEM and MRI perform with similar accuracies, with CEM having a slightly higher specificity (fewer false positives), although larger studies are needed. There are various reasons for false positives and false negatives at CEM. False positives at CEM can be caused by benign lesions with vascularity, including benign tumors, infection or inflammation, benign lesions in the skin, and imaging artifacts. False negatives at CEM can be attributed to incomplete or inadequate visualization of lesions, marked background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) obscuring cancer, lack of lesion contrast enhancement due to technical issues or less-vascular cancers, artifacts, and errors of lesion perception or characterization. When possible, real-time interpretation of CEM studies is ideal. If additional views are necessary, they may be obtained while contrast material is still in the breast parenchyma. Until recently, a limitation of CEM was the lack of CEM-guided biopsy capability. However, in 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration cleared two devices to support CEM-guided biopsy using a stereotactic biopsy technique. The authors review various causes of false-positive and false-negative contrast-enhanced mammograms and discuss strategies to reduce these diagnostic errors to improve cancer detection while mitigating unnecessary additional imaging and procedures. ©RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

Management of screening-detected lobular neoplasia in the era of digital breast tomosynthesis: A preliminary study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to determine upgrade rates of lobular neoplasia detected by screening digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and to determine imaging and clinicopathological features that may influence risk of upgrade.

METHODS

Medical records were reviewed of consecutive women who presented with screening DBT-detected atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) and/or lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) from January 1, 2013, to June 30, 2020. Included patients underwent needle biopsy and had surgery or at least two-year imaging follow-up. Imaging and clinicopathological features were compared between upgraded and nonupgraded cases of lobular neoplasia using the Pearson's chi-squared test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

During the study period, 107 women (mean age 55 years, range 40-88 years) with 110 cases of ALH and/or LCIS underwent surgery (80.9%, n = 89) or at least two-year imaging follow-up (19.1%, n = 21). The overall upgrade rate to cancer was 5.5% (6/110), and the upgrade rate to invasive cancer was 3.6% (4/110). The upgrade rate of ALH to cancer was 4.1% (3/74), whereas the upgrade rate of LCIS to cancer was 9.4% (3/32) (p = .28). The upgrade rate of cases presenting as calcifications was 4.2% (3/71), whereas the upgrade rates of cases presenting as noncalcified findings was 7.7% (3/39) (p = .44).

CONCLUSIONS

The upgrade rate of screening DBT-detected lobular neoplasia is less than 6%. Surveillance rather than surgery can be considered for lobular neoplasia, particularly in patients with ALH and in those with screening-detected calcifications leading to the diagnosis.

Update on Lobular Neoplasia

Lobular neoplasia (LN) is a histopathologic entity that encompasses both lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) and atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH). Management of LN is known to be variable and institutionally dependent. The variability in approach after a diagnosis of LN at percutaneous breast biopsy derives in part from heterogeneity in the literature, resulting in a range of reported upgrade rates to malignancy after initial identification at percutaneous biopsy, and also from historical shifts in understanding of the natural history of LN. It has become increasingly recognized that not all LN is the same and that distinct variants of LN such as pleomorphic LCIS and florid LCIS have distinct natural histories and distinct likelihoods of upgrade to malignancy. In addition, it is also increasingly understood that appropriate management of LN relies on scrupulous radiologic-pathologic correlation. This review details the imaging features and histopathologic nature of ALH, classic-type LCIS, and the LCIS variants; addresses changes in the historical understanding of this entity contributing to confusion regarding its management; and discusses the importance of performing radiologic-pathologic correlation after percutaneous biopsy to help guide appropriate management steps when LN is encountered. In addition to the short-term implications of an LN diagnosis in terms of upgrade and surgical outcomes, the long-term implications of an LN diagnosis regarding risk of developing a later breast cancer are examined. ©RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center.

Implementation of vacuum-assisted excision as a management option for benign and high-risk breast lesions

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies have shown that vacuum-assisted excision (VAE) is a safe and effective alternative for surgical excision (SE) of benign breast lesions. However, the use of VAE in high-risk lesions is controversial and guidelines are ambiguous. This study describes the impact of the implementation of VAE in terms of management and outcomes compared to a cohort before implementation.

METHODS

A single centre retrospective study with two cohorts: 'before' and 'after' implementation of VAE was performed. All patients with a benign or high-risk lesion treated by VAE or SE between 2016 and 2019 were included. Excision, complication, and upgrade rates were compared between both cohorts. Cox regression was used for the evaluation of recurrences and re-excisions.

RESULTS

The overall excision rate of all benign and high-risk lesions was comparable in both cohorts (17% vs 16%, p = 0.700). After implementation, benign lesions were significantly more often managed by VAE (101/151, 67%, p < 0.001). Re-excision, recurrence, and complication rates were low and comparable between cohorts (4.3% vs 3.9%, p > 0.999; 3.0 vs 2.0%, p = 0.683; 3.4 vs 6.6%, p = 0.289, respectively).

CONCLUSION

SE could safely be replaced by VAE in 58% of patients treated for a benign or high-risk lesion. With this shift in management, the use of operating rooms and general anaesthesia can safely be omitted in this patient group. Further research on high-risk lesions is warranted since our data are exploratory.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This study provides supportive data for the use of VAE as a management option for both benign (up to 5 cm) and high-risk lesions. Outcomes on re-excision, recurrence should be confirmed in prospective studies especially in high-risk lesions.

The morphologic spectrum of lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) observations on clinical significance, management implications and diagnostic pitfalls of classic, florid and pleomorphic LCIS

Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) is a non-invasive proliferation of atypical dyscohesive epithelial cells characterized by loss or functional alteration of E-cadherin-mediated cell adhesion. The morphologic spectrum of LCIS encompasses classic (C-LCIS), florid (F-LCIS) and pleomorphic LCIS (P-LCIS), as recently defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) Expert Consensus Group. Atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) is also part of this spectrum.This article highlights the morphologic and immunohistochemical features of the three forms of LCIS and summarizes their management implications and prognosis, with emphasis on F-LCIS and P-LCIS.

High-risk lesions in the breast diagnosed by MRI-guided core biopsy: upgrade rates and features associated with malignancy

PURPOSE

This study assessed the upgrade rates of high-risk lesions (HRLs) in the breast diagnosed by MRI-guided core biopsy and evaluated imaging and clinical features associated with upgrade to malignancy.

METHODS

This IRB-approved, retrospective study included MRI-guided breast biopsy exams yielding HRLs from August 1, 2011, to August 31, 2020. HRLs included atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH), radial scar, and papilloma. Only lesions that underwent excision or at least 2 years of MRI imaging follow-up were included. For each HRL, patient history, imaging features, and outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

Seventy-two lesions in 65 patients were included in the study, with 8/72 (11.1%) of the lesions upgraded to malignancy. Upgrade rates were 16.7% (2/12) for ADH, 100% (1/1) for pleomorphic LCIS, 40% (2/5) for other LCIS, 0% (0/19) for ALH, 0% (0/18) for papilloma, and 0% (0/7) for radial scar/complex sclerosing lesion. Additionally, two cases of marked ADH bordering on DCIS and one case of marked ALH bordering on LCIS, were upgraded. Lesions were more likely to be upgraded if they presented as T2 hypointense (versus isotense, OR 6.46, 95% CI 1.27-32.92) or as linear or segmental non-mass enhancement (NME, versus focal or regional, p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

Our data support the recommendation that ADH and LCIS on MRI-guided biopsy warrant surgical excision due to high upgrade rates. HRLs that present as T2 hypointense, or as linear or segmental NME, should be viewed with suspicion as these were associated with higher upgrade rates to malignancy.

Are Columnar Cell Lesions the Earliest Non-Obligate Precursor in the Low-Grade Breast Neoplasia Pathway?

Columnar cell lesions (CCLs) of the breast comprise a spectrum of morphologic alterations of the terminal duct lobular unit involving variably dilated and enlarged acini lined by columnar epithelial cells. The World Health Organization currently classifies CCLs without atypia as columnar cell change (CCC) and columnar cell hyperplasia (CCH), whereas flat epithelial atypia (FEA) is a unifying term encompassing both CCC and CCH with cytologic atypia. CCLs have been increasingly recognized in stereotactic core needle biopsies (CNBs) performed for the assessment of calcifications. CCLs are believed to represent the earliest non-obligate precursor of low-grade invasive breast carcinomas as they share molecular alterations and often coexist with entities in the low-grade breast neoplasia pathway. Despite this association, however, the risk of progression of CCLs to invasive breast carcinoma appears low and may not exceed that of concurrent proliferative lesions. As the reported upgrade rates of pure CCL/FEA when identified as the most advanced high-risk lesion on CNB vary widely, the management of FEA diagnosed on CNB remains controversial. This review will include a historical overview of CCLs and will examine histologic diagnostic criteria, molecular alterations, prognosis and issues related to upgrade rates and clinical management.

Rethinking Routine Surgical Excision for all Radial Sclerosing Lesions of the Breast

INTRODUCTION

The need for routine surgical excision of a radial sclerosing lesions (RSL) of the breast identified on percutaneous biopsy remains controversial, as contemporary upgrade rates are lower than historically cited.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospectively-maintained database of high-risk breast biopsies undergoing multidisciplinary review at a single institution was queried to identify cases of RSL from 2/2015 to 11/2020. Demographic, radiologic, and pathologic variables were summarized using frequencies and analyzed in association with RSL excision status using mixed-effects logistic regression or Fisher's exact tests.

RESULTS

217 RSL were identified, diagnosed at a mean age of 57 y. The median imaging size was 1.3 cm and the majority had estimated >50% of the target removed by core needle biopsy. 32.3% underwent surgical excision of the RSL biopsy site and 2/70 (2.9%) upgraded to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) on final surgical pathology. Upgrade was significantly higher for atypical RSL (P = 0.02). None of the RSL (n = 60) without atypia who had undergone excision were upgraded. For those omitting surgical excision, there was no subsequent breast cancer diagnosis at the RSL site over a mean follow-up of 23 mo.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical excision may be omitted for RSL without atypia as this group has 0% risk of upgrade after multidisciplinary review.

Hospital costs and cosmetic outcome of benign and high-risk breast lesions managed by vacuum-assisted excision versus surgical excision

OBJECTIVES

Although vacuum-assisted excision (VAE) is a safe and effective alternative to surgical excision (SE), the latter is most commonly used for the management of benign and high-risk breast lesions. To evaluate the healthcare benefit of VAE, hospital costs and cosmetic outcome after VAE were compared to SE. Additionally, the impact of VAE implementation on hospital costs was investigated.

METHODS

This was a single-centre retrospective cohort study with two cohorts: "VAE" and "SE". All patients with a benign or high-risk lesion excised by VAE or SE from January 2016 up to December 2019 were included. Cosmetic outcome was measured with the BCTOS-cosmetic subscale, and hospital costs were presented as mean (SD) and median (IQR).

RESULTS

During the study period, 258 patients with 295 excised lesions were included. The initial procedure was VAE in 102 patients and SE in 156 patients. Hospital costs after (median € 2324) were significantly lower than before (median € 3,144) implementation of VAE (mean difference € 1,004, p < 0.001), most likely attributable to the lower costs for patients treated with VAE (mean difference € 1,979, p < 0.001). Mean cosmetic outcome was comparable between VAE (median 1.35) and SE (median 1.44, p = 0.802).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing VAE as an alternative treatment option for benign and high-risk breast lesions resulted in a large decrease in hospital costs but a cosmetic benefit of VAE could not be demonstrated in this retrospective study.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Costs associated with the complete patient pathway were included and not only VAE was compared to SE but also the before cohort was compared to the after cohort to demonstrate the benefit of VAE implementation in clinical practice. Additionally, cosmetic outcome was compared between VAE and SE using patient reported outcome measures.

Breast papillomas in the United States: single institution data on underrepresented minorities with a multi-institutional update on incidence

PURPOSE

To assess the percentage of papillomas from all biopsies performed, comparing differences in patient age and race at a single institution. To assess trends in biopsied papillomas at institutions throughout the United States (US).

METHODS

This is a HIPPA-compliant IRB-approved single-institution (Southern1) retrospective review to assess race and age of all-modality-biopsied non-malignant papillomas as a percentage of all biopsies (percentage papillomas calculated as papilloma biopsies/all biopsies) from January 2012 to December 2019. To assess national variation, several academic or large referral centers were contacted to provide data regarding papilloma percentages, biopsy modalities, and trends in case numbers. Trends were estimated using the method of analysis of variance (ANOVA). Comparisons of differences in trends were assessed.

RESULTS

Southern1 institution demonstrated a significant association between race and percentage of papillomas (p < 0.0001). After adjustment for multiple comparisons with Bonferroni correction at 5% type I family error, the percentage of biopsied papillomas in Black and Asian patients remained significantly higher than in White patients (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0032, respectively) using a Chi-square test. The regional variation in percentage of papillomas was found to be 3-9%. Southern1 institution showed a 7-year significant trend of increase in percentage of papillomas. Other institutions showed a decreasing trend (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Black and Asian women had significantly higher papilloma percentages compared to white patients in our single institution review. This institution also showed a statistically significant trend of increasing percentage papillomas from 2012 to 2019. Multi-institutional survey found regional variation in percentage papillomas, ranging from 3% to 9%.

Pure Radial Scars Do Not Require Surgical Excision When Concordant and Benign at Image-guided Breast Biopsy

OBJECTIVE

To determine the best management option (surgical excision versus imaging surveillance) following the diagnosis of pure radial scars (RSs) and RSs with associated additional high-risk lesions (HRLs) encountered on percutaneous core-needle breast biopsy.

METHODS

An IRB-approved retrospective review of the breast imaging reporting system database was performed to identify all cases of pure RS alone or RS plus an additional HRL (papilloma, atypia, lobular neoplasia) diagnosed on core-needle biopsy, from 2007 to 2016, at four breast centers in our institution. Cases with associated malignancy, discordant radiologic-pathologic results, or those lost to follow-up were excluded. The remaining cases were evaluated to determine results of either subsequent surgical excision or long-term follow-up imaging (minimum of two years). Additional data recorded included clinical presentation, breast density, personal and family history of breast cancer, lesion imaging characteristics, and biopsy method.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 111 patients with 111 lesions: 56.8% (63/111) with RS alone (pure) and 43.2% (48/111) with RS plus additional HRL(s). Out of the 63 radiologic-pathologic concordant pure RSs, there were no upgrades to malignancy in 51 subsequent surgical excisions or 12 long-term surveillance cases (0/63, 0%). Out of the 48 RSs plus additional HRL(s), there were 2 upgrades to malignancy (2/48, 4.2%).

CONCLUSION

Cases of radiologic-pathologic concordant pure RS diagnosed at core-needle biopsy do not require surgical excision. On the other hand, surgical excision should be considered for RS plus additional HRLs diagnosed at core-needle biopsy.

Evidence-Based Pragmatic Approach to the Management of Borderline or High-Risk Breast Lesions

The management of borderline/high-risk breast lesions (HRLs) remains controversial. We propose a pragmatic evidence-based approach based on lesion type. For lobular carcinoma in situ with pleomorphism, papilloma with atypia, atypical ductal hyperplasia, and fibroepithelial lesion, surgical consultation and excision are recommended. Patients with other borderline/HRLs are referred for surgical consultation to discuss excision versus surveillance. Our recommendations align with American Society of Breast Surgeons guidelines, which aim to reduce unnecessary surgery and ensure appropriate follow-up.

Risk management recommendations and patient acceptance vary with high-risk breast lesions

INTRODUCTION

Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), atypical ductal and lobular hyperplasia (AH) increase breast cancer risk. We examined risk management recommendations (RMR) and acceptance in AH/LCIS.

METHODS

All patients with AH/LCIS on core needle biopsy from 2013 to 2016 at our institution were identified; cancer patients were excluded. Univariate and multivariate analysis examined factors associated with management.

RESULTS

98 % of patients were evaluated by breast surgeons and 53 % underwent risk model calculation (RC). 77 % had new RMR. RMR of MRI screening (MRI), genetic counselling (GC) and medical oncology (MO) referral were 41 %, 18 %, 77 %, respectively. MRI screening was more likely recommended in those with strong family history (p = 0.01), and high RC (p < 0.001). Uptake of at least one RMR did not occur in 84 % of patients. Use of RC correlated with MO acceptance (p = 0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnosis of atypia has the potential to change risk management for most, however only 16 % of patients accepted all RMR.

Radial Scar: a management dilemma

Radial scar (RS) or complex sclerosing lesions (CSL) if > 10 mm is a benign lesion with an increasing incidence of diagnosis (ranging from 0.6 to 3.7%) and represents a challenge both for radiologists and for pathologists. The digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis appearances of RS are well documented, according to the literature. On ultrasound, variable aspects can be detected. Magnetic resonance imaging contribution to differential diagnosis with carcinoma is growing. As for the management, a vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) with large core is recommended after a percutaneous diagnosis of RS due to potential sampling error. According to the recent International Consensus Conference, a RS/CSL lesion, which is visible on imaging, should undergo therapeutic excision with VAB. Thereafter, surveillance is justified. The aim of this review is to provide a practical guide for the recognition of RS on imaging, illustrating radiological findings according to the most recent literature, and to delineate the management strategies that follow.

Papillary neoplasms of the breast including upgrade rates and management of intraductal papilloma without atypia diagnosed at core needle biopsy

Papillary neoplasms of the breast are a heterogeneous group of epithelial tumors nearly entirely composed of papillae. Their classification rests on the characteristics of the epithelium and the presence and distribution of the myoepithelial cells along the papillae and around the tumor. Papillary neoplasms of the breast can be diagnostically challenging, especially if only core needle biopsy (CNB) material is available. This review summarizes salient morphological and immunohistochemical features, clinical presentation, and differential diagnoses of papillary neoplasms of the breast. We include a contemporary appraisal of the upgrade rate to carcinoma (invasive carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS]) and atypical hyperplasias in surgical excision specimens obtained following CNB diagnosis of papilloma without atypia, and a review of the available follow-up data in cases without immediate surgical excision.

Precision pathology as applied to breast core needle biopsy evaluation: implications for management

With the shift to de-escalation of therapy for some breast cancers and fewer surgical excisions for high-risk lesions identified on breast imaging studies at one end of the spectrum, and the greater use of neoadjuvant systemic therapy at the other end, pathologists are ever more critical in guiding management decisions for women with breast disease following core needle biopsy. One important consequence of this shift in management paradigms is the elimination of the opportunity for a "second-look" with the excision specimen to confirm or refine the diagnosis rendered on core needle biopsy. Thus, not only is there the imperative for accuracy and precision of core needle biopsy diagnoses, increasingly it is the only opportunity for that diagnosis.

Management of High-Risk Breast Lesions

High-risk breast lesions (HRLs) are a group of heterogeneous lesions that can be associated with a synchronous or adjacent breast cancer and that confer an elevated lifetime risk of breast cancer. Management of HRLs after core needle biopsy may include close imaging and clinical follow-up or excisional biopsy to evaluate for cancer. This article reviews histologic features and clinical presentation of each of the HRLs, current evidence with regard to management, and guidelines from the American Society of Breast Surgeons and National Comprehensive Cancer Network. In addition, imaging surveillance and risk-reduction strategies for women with HRLs are discussed.

Performance of a clinical and imaging-based multivariate model as decision support tool to help save unnecessary surgeries for high-risk breast lesions

PURPOSE

To investigate the performance of an imaging and biopsy parameters-based multivariate model in decreasing unnecessary surgeries for high-risk breast lesions.

METHODS

In an IRB-approved study, we retrospectively reviewed all high-risk lesions (HRL) identified at imaging-guided biopsy in our institution between July 1, 2014-July 1, 2017. Lesions were categorized high-risk-I (HR-I = atypical ductal hyperplasia, atypical lobular hyperplasia, lobular carcinoma in situ and atypical papillary lesion) and II (HR-II = Flat epithelial atypia, radial scar, benign papilloma). Patient risk factors, lesion features, detection and biopsy modality, excision and cancer upgrade rates were collected. Reference standard for upgrade was either excision or at least 2-year imaging follow-up. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to develop a multivariate model using HRL type, lesion and biopsy needle size for surgical cancer upgrade with performance assessed using ROC analysis.

RESULTS

Of 699 HRL in 652 patients, 525(75%) had reference standard available, and 48/525(9.1%) showed cancer at surgical excision. Excision (84.5% vs 51.1%) and upgrade (17.6%vs1.8%) rates were higher in HR-I compared to HR-II (p < 0.01). In HR-I, small needle size < 12G vs ≥ 12G [32.1% vs 13.2%, p < 0.01] and less cores [< 6 vs ≥ 6, 28.6%vs13.7%, p = 0.01] were significantly associated with higher cancer upgrades. Our multivariate model had an AUC = 0.87, saving 28.1% of benign surgeries with 100% sensitivity, based on HRL subtype, lesion size(mm, continuous), needle size (< 12G vs ≥ 12G) and biopsy modality (US vs MRI vs stereotactic) CONCLUSION: Our multivariate model using lesion size, needle size and patient age had a high diagnostic performance in decreasing unnecessary surgeries and shows promise as a decision support tool.

Risk for Upgrade to Malignancy After Breast Core Needle Biopsy Diagnosis of Lobular Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

Lobular neoplasia (LN) detected on breast core needle biopsy is frequently managed with surgical excision because of concern for undersampled malignancy. The authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the risk for upgrade to malignancy in the setting of imaging-concordant classic LN diagnosed on core biopsy.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase were searched for original articles published from 1998 to 2020 that reported rates of upgrade to malignancy for classic LN, including atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) and classic lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS). Two reviewers extracted study data and assessed the following quality criteria: exclusion of variant LCIS, exclusion of imaging-discordant lesions, and outcome reporting for ≥70% of lesions. For studies meeting all criteria, pooled risks for upgrade to any malignancy (invasive carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ) and invasive malignancy for all LN, ALH, and LCIS were estimated using random-effects models.

RESULTS

For 65 full-text articles included in the review, the risk for upgrade to any malignancy ranged from 0% to 45%. Among the 16 studies that met all quality criteria for the meta-analysis, pooled risks for upgrade to any malignancy were 3.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8%-5.2%) for all LN, 2.5% (95% CI, 1.6%-3.9%) for ALH, and 5.8% (95% CI, 2.9%-11.3%) for LCIS. Risks for upgrade to invasive malignancy were 1.3% (95% CI, 0.7%-2.4%) for all LN, 0.4% (95% CI, 0.0%-4.2%) for ALH, and 3.5% (95% CI, 2.0%-5.9%) for LCIS.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk for upgrade to malignancy for LN found on breast biopsy is low. Imaging surveillance can likely be offered as an alternative to surgical management for LN, particularly for ALH.

Artificial Intelligence: A Primer for Breast Imaging Radiologists

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a branch of computer science dedicated to developing computer algorithms that emulate intelligent human behavior. Subfields of AI include machine learning and deep learning. Advances in AI technologies have led to techniques that could increase breast cancer detection, improve clinical efficiency in breast imaging practices, and guide decision-making regarding screening and prevention strategies. This article reviews key terminology and concepts, discusses common AI models and methods to validate and evaluate these models, describes emerging AI applications in breast imaging, and outlines challenges and future directions. Familiarity with AI terminology, concepts, methods, and applications is essential for breast imaging radiologists to critically evaluate these emerging technologies, recognize their strengths and limitations, and ultimately ensure optimal patient care.

Opening label, dynamic prospective cohort study on the small focus less than 1.0 cm shown by type B ultrasound in breast

BACKGROUND

A consensus has not been achieved regarding the treatment of small nonpalpable breast lesions, and the purpose of this study was to prospectively investigate nonpalpable lesions less than 1.0 cm in diameter to explore the risk factors for such lesions and determine appropriate treatment of such kind of lesions.

METHODS

A total of 1039 patients with small lesions less than 1.0 cm in diameter who underwent mammography and ultrasound from 2009 to 2010 in our institution were prospectively enrolled. Among them, 80 patients underwent biopsy, whose lesions grew by more than 30% of its original size, with an unclear boundary or irregular shape. All patients were followed-up for an average of 24 months, and lesions identified as high-risk types, such as cancer or atypical hyperplasia, of tumors on pathological examination were labeled "meaningful lesions." Then relevant factors affecting the detection of meaningful lesions were analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 40 meaningful lesions including 2 breast cancers were detected, accounting for 3.8% and 0.2% of all patients, respectively. Univariate analysis identified smoking (P = .030), irregular shape (P = .018), unclear boundary (P = .024), and vascularization (P = .023) as risk factors for the detection of meaningful lesions (P < .05). On multivariate analysis, smoking and irregular shape were further identified as independent risk factors for the detection of meaningful lesions.

CONCLUSION

The overall incidence of cancer among nonpalpable lesions with a diameter less than 1.0 cm is low. Biopsies are strongly recommended for patients who are smokers or who have small lesions with an irregular shape, whereas regular follow-up observation is likely safe for other patients with small, non-palpable breast lesions.

Trends in frequency and outcome of high-risk breast lesions at core needle biopsy in women recalled at biennial screening mammography, a multiinstitutional study

Between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2016, we studied the incidence, management and outcome of high‐risk breast lesions in a consecutive series of 376,519 screens of women who received biennial screening mammography. During the 6‐year period covered by the study, the proportion of women who underwent core needle biopsy (CNB) after recall remained fairly stable, ranging from 39.2% to 48.1% (mean: 44.2%, 5,212/11,783), whereas the proportion of high‐risk lesions at CNB (i.e., flat epithelial atypia, atypical ductal hyperplasia, lobular carcinoma in situ and papillary lesions) gradually increased from 3.2% (25/775) in 2011 to 9.5% (86/901) in 2016 (p < 0.001). The mean proportion of high‐risk lesions at CNB that were subsequently treated with diagnostic surgical excision was 51.4% (169/329) and varied between 41.0% and 64.3% through the years, but the excision rate for high‐risk lesions per 1,000 screens and per 100 recalls increased from 0.25 (2011) to 0.70 (2016; p < 0.001) and from 0.81 (2011) to 2.50 (2016; p < 0.001), respectively. The proportion of all diagnostic surgical excisions showing in situ or invasive breast cancer was 29.0% (49/169) and varied from 22.2% (8/36) in 2014 to 38.5% (5/13) in 2011. In conclusion, the proportion of high‐risk lesions at CNB tripled in a 6‐year period, with a concomitant increased excision rate for these lesions. As the proportion of surgical excisions showing in situ or invasive breast cancer did not increase, a rising number of screened women underwent invasive surgical excision with benign outcome.

What's new?

Screening mammography aims to catch breast cancer early to reduce associated morbidity and mortality. Women with suspect findings at mammography frequently are recalled for further testing with core needle biopsy (CNB). In this investigation, the proportion of high‐risk lesions detected at CNB was found to have tripled among women in the Netherlands who underwent mammographic screening between 2011 and 2016. This increase was accompanied by an increase in lesion excision rates. Of excised lesions, little more than 14% proved to be malignant at two‐year follow‐up. The remainder of lesions exhibited benign pathology, suggesting that many women underwent potentially unnecessary surgery.

Meta-analysis of upgrade rates in 3163 radial scars excised after needle core biopsy diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Since concurrent malignancy may be associated with radial scars (RS) in up to 45% of RS diagnosed on core biopsy, surgical excision is usually advised. Recent very low upgrade rates have caused a re-evaluation of the need for routine surgery. We aimed to find subsets of RS at such low risk of upgrade, as to render imaging surveillance a plausible alternative to surgery.

DESIGN

We performed a systematic review of the Pubmed, Cochrane and Embase databases, focusing on the following eligibility criteria: full papers, published after 1998, in English, included at least 5 RS, provided information on needle biopsy gauge and upgrade rates based on the excised lesion. For the meta-analysis, studies were grouped by the presence of histologic atypia and the core needle gauge. Study-specific and pooled upgrade rates were calculated for each subgroup.

RESULTS

49 studies that included 3163 RS with surgical outcomes are included. There were 217 upgrades to malignancies, 71 (32.7%) invasive and 144 (66.4%) DCIS. The random-effects pooled estimate was 7% (95% CI 5, 9%). Among the pre-planned subgroups, in RS assessed by 14G NCB the upgrade rates were: without atypia - 5% (95% CI 3, 8%), mixed or presence of atypia not specified - 15% (95% CI 10, 20%), with atypia - 29% (95% CI 20, 38%). For RS assessed by a mix of 8-16G cores the respective upgrade rates were 2% (95% CI 1, 4%), 12% (95% CI 6, 18%) and 11% (95% CI 3, 23%) and for RS assessed by 8-11 vacuum assisted biopsies 1% (95% CI 0, 4%), 5% (95% CI 0, 11%) and 18% for the one study of RS with atypia assessed by VAB. Surgery after VAB excision showed no upgrades. The difference across all subgroups was statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

When stratified by atypia and biopsy gauge, upgrade rates in RS are consistent and predictable. RS assessed by VABs and lacking atypia have a 1% (95% CI 0, 4%) upgrade rate to DCIS. Other groups have upgrade rates of 2-28%. This risk may be reduced by VAB excision. The results of this meta-analysis provide a decision aid and evidence-based selection criteria for surgery after a needle biopsy diagnosis of RS.