1
|
Mayer EL, Ren Y, Wagle N, Mahtani R, Ma C, DeMichele A, Cristofanilli M, Meisel J, Miller KD, Abdou Y, Riley EC, Qamar R, Sharma P, Reid S, Sinclair N, Faggen M, Block CC, Ko N, Partridge AH, Chen WY, DeMeo M, Attaya V, Okpoebo A, Alberti J, Liu Y, Gauthier E, Burstein HJ, Regan MM, Tolaney SM. PACE: A Randomized Phase II Study of Fulvestrant, Palbociclib, and Avelumab After Progression on Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitor and Aromatase Inhibitor for Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2024:JCO2301940. [PMID: 38513188 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) are an important component of treatment for hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC), but it is not known if patients might derive benefit from continuation of CDK4/6i with endocrine therapy beyond initial tumor progression or if the addition of checkpoint inhibitor therapy has value in this setting. METHODS The randomized multicenter phase II PACE trial enrolled patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2- MBC whose disease had progressed on previous CDK4/6i and aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy. Patients were randomly assigned 1:2:1 to receive fulvestrant (F), fulvestrant plus palbociclib (F + P), or fulvestrant plus palbociclib and avelumab (F + P + A). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) in patients treated with F versus F + P. RESULTS Overall, 220 patients were randomly assigned between September 2017 and February 2022. The median age was 57 years (range, 25-83 years). Most patients were postmenopausal (80.9%), and 40% were originally diagnosed with de novo MBC. Palbociclib was the most common previous CDK4/6i (90.9%). The median PFS was 4.8 months on F and 4.6 months on F + P (hazard ratio [HR], 1.11 [90% CI, 0.79 to 1.55]; P = .62). The median PFS on F + P + A was 8.1 months (HR v F, 0.75 [90% CI, 0.50 to 1.12]; P = .23). The difference in PFS with F + P and F + P + A versus F was greater among patients with baseline ESR1 and PIK3CA alterations. CONCLUSION The addition of palbociclib to fulvestrant did not improve PFS versus fulvestrant alone among patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2- MBC whose disease had progressed on a previous CDK4/6i plus AI. The increased PFS seen with the addition of avelumab warrants further investigation in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica L Mayer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Yue Ren
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Nikhil Wagle
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Reshma Mahtani
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL
| | - Cynthia Ma
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Angela DeMichele
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Jane Meisel
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Kathy D Miller
- Hematology/Oncology Division, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Yara Abdou
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Elizabeth C Riley
- Department of Medicine, Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville Health, Louisville, KY
| | | | - Priyanka Sharma
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS
| | - Sonya Reid
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Natalie Sinclair
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Meredith Faggen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Caroline C Block
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Naomi Ko
- Department of Medical Oncology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Ann H Partridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Wendy Y Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Michelle DeMeo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Victoria Attaya
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Amanda Okpoebo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Jillian Alberti
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Harold J Burstein
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Meredith M Regan
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Sara M Tolaney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Freedman R, Ren S, Tayob N, Gelman R, Smith KL, Davis R, Pereslete A, Attaya V, Cotter C, Chen WY, Santa-Maria CA, Van Poznak C, Moy B, Brufsky AM, Melisko M, O’Sullivan CC, Ashai N, Rauf Y, Nangia J, Trapani D, Savoie J, Burns R, Wolff AC, Winer E, Rimawi M, Krop I, Lin NU. Abstract PD7-03: Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium Trial 022: Neratinib and Trastuzumab-Emtansine for HER2+ Breast Cancer Brain Metastases (BCBM). Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-pd7-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
PURPOSE: Treatment options for patients (pts) with HER2+ BCBM remain limited. We previously reported that neratinib monotherapy is associated with a volumetric central nervous system objective response rate (CNS ORR) of 8%, whereas the combination of neratinib and capecitabine resulted in a volumetric CNS ORR of 49% (in lapatinib-naïve pts). Preclinical data suggest that neratinib may overcome resistance to trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) and that the combination has potential CNS efficacy. Here, we report results of neratinib plus T-DM1 in pts with HER2+ BCBM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective, multicenter, phase II study, pts with measurable HER2+ BCBM received neratinib 160 mg orally once daily plus T-DM1 3.6 mg/kg IV every 21 days in three parallel-enrolling cohorts. Cohort 4A enrolled pts with previously untreated brain metastases. Cohort 4B enrolled pts with BCBM progressing after prior local CNS-directed therapy without prior exposure to T-DM1. Cohort 4C enrolled pts with BCBM progressing after prior local CNS-directed therapy who had previous exposure to T-DM1. Diarrhea prophylaxis with colestipol and loperamide was required during cycle 1. Cohorts 4A and 4B were single-stage with a planned enrollment of 20 patients; cohort 4C had a two-stage design, with a requirement for at least 1 of the first 9 pts to achieve a response in order to enroll a total of 24 patients. The primary endpoint was Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology-Brain Metastases (RANO BM) in each cohort separately. Correlative studies included patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for gastrointestinal toxicity. RESULTS: We enrolled 6, 17, and 21 patients to cohorts 4A, 4B, and 4C, during 11/07/2018 – 11/01/2021. Enrollment was stopped prematurely due to slow accrual. Across Cohorts 4A-4C, the median number of prior lines of chemotherapy prior to enrollment was 2 (range 1-10); 25% received prior lapatinib and no patients received prior tucatinib. In cohorts 4B and 4C (prior CNS-treated cohorts), 33% had prior CNS surgery and >94% had prior CNS radiation. Among evaluable patients, CNS ORR in cohorts 4A (n=6), 4B (n=16), and 4C (n=21) was 50.0% (95% CI 18.8- 81.2%), 25.0% (95% CI 8.3-52.6%), and 38.1% (95% CI 19.0-61.3%), respectively. Median (range) number of cycles completed for 4A, 4B, and 4C was 4.5 (1-15), 4 (range 0-49+), and 6 (0-23); three patients on Cohort 4B remain on protocol therapy (cycles 14, 45, and 49). The overall survival at 12-months for cohorts 4A, 4B, and 4C was 83.3% (95% CI, 58.3-100%), 86.2% (95% CI 70-100%), and 83.3% (95% CI 67.6-100%). Diarrhea was the most common grade 3 toxicity (19.0–33.3% across cohorts); one grade 4 liver function event occurred in cohort 4B. Updated efficacy results will be reported at the meeting; PRO analyses are ongoing. CONCLUSION: Intracranial activity was observed for the combination of neratinib plus T-DM1 across all three enrolled cohorts, including those with prior T-DM1 exposure, suggesting synergistic effects of this treatment combination. Our data provide additional evidence for consideration of neratinib-based combinations in pts with HER2+ BCBM.
Citation Format: Rachel Freedman, Siyang Ren, Nabihah Tayob, Rebecca Gelman, Karen L. Smith, Raechel Davis, Alyssa Pereslete, Victoria Attaya, Christine Cotter, Wendy Y. Chen, Cesar Augusto Santa-Maria, Catherine Van Poznak, Beverly Moy, Adam M. Brufsky, Michelle Melisko, Ciara C. O’Sullivan, Nadia Ashai, Yasmeen Rauf, Julie Nangia, Dario Trapani, Jennifer Savoie, Robyn Burns, Antonio C. Wolff, Eric Winer, Mothaffar Rimawi, Ian Krop, Nancy U. Lin. Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium Trial 022: Neratinib and Trastuzumab-Emtansine for HER2+ Breast Cancer Brain Metastases (BCBM) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD7-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Karen L. Smith
- 5Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Adam M. Brufsky
- 14UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
| | - Michelle Melisko
- 15University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Robyn Burns
- 22Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium
| | | | | | | | - Ian Krop
- 26Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Nancy U. Lin
- 27Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mayer EL, Ren Y, Wagle N, Mahtani R, Ma C, DeMichele A, Cristofanilli M, Meisel J, Miller KD, Jolly T, Riley E, Qamar R, Sharma P, Reid S, Sinclair N, Faggen M, Block C, Ko N, Partridge A, Chen WY, DeMeo MK, Attaya V, Okpoebo A, Liu Y, Gauthier E, Burstein H, Regan M, Tolaney S. Abstract GS3-06: GS3-06 Palbociclib After CDK4/6i and Endocrine Therapy (PACE): A Randomized Phase II Study of Fulvestrant, Palbociclib, and Avelumab for Endocrine Pre-treated ER+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-gs3-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) have a well-established role in the management of hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The benefit of continuing CDK4/6i beyond progression in combination with a different ET has not been confirmed. Preclinical data suggest synergy between CDK4/6i and PD-L1 inhibition. The PACE trial prospectively evaluates whether continuation of the CKD4/6i palbociclib beyond progression on prior CDK4/6i and aromatase inhibitor (AI), with a change in ET to fulvestrant, improves outcomes beyond change to fulvestrant alone, as well as explores the activity of the palbociclib, fulvestrant, and avelumab triplet. Methods PACE is a multicenter randomized open-label investigator-initiated phase II trial, open at 11 U.S. sites. Eligible patients (pts) had HR+/HER2- evaluable MBC with prior progression on AI and any CDK4/6i after > 6 months (mo) of therapy in the MBC setting, or during/within 12 mo in the adjuvant setting, with no more than 1 prior line of chemotherapy for MBC. Pts were randomized 1:2:1 to fulvestrant alone (F); fulvestrant and palbociclib (F+P); or fulvestrant, palbociclib, avelumab (F+P+A), with tumor assessments every 8 weeks. Blood for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis was collected at baseline, at times of tumor assessments, and at progression. The primary objective was to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) with F+P vs F; secondary objectives included PFS with F+P+A vs F, objective response rate (ORR) in all arms, and safety. A sample size of 220 patients was planned to provide 80% power to detect an improvement in PFS with HR 0.6154 with F+P vs F (6.5 vs 4 mo; α(1)=0.05). Results A total of 220 pts were randomized from 9/2017-2/2022 (F: n=55, F+P: n=111, F+P+A: n=54); median age 57 years (range 25-83), 85% non-Hispanic (7.7% non-Hispanic black), 8.6% Hispanic, 6.4% unknown. 40% had de novo MBC, 60% had visceral disease, and 14% bone-only disease. 16% had 1 prior line of chemotherapy for MBC, 90% had received prior palbociclib, 4.5% ribociclib, 4.1% abemaciclib, 1.4% palbociclib and ribociclib. Pts entered the trial after a median 19 mo of prior CDK4/6i plus AI (interquartile range 12-31 mo). A total of 10 (5%) pts received protocol therapy as first line ET for MBC, 169 (77%) as second line, and 41 (17%) as beyond second line. 88% entered the trial directly after progression on CDK4/6i. After a median follow-up of 24 mo, 18 pts remained on protocol treatment. PFS was not improved with F+P vs F (median 4.6 vs 4.8 mo; HR=1.11, 90% CI 0.79-1.55; 2-sided p=0.62). Median PFS was 8.1 mo with F+P+A (HR=0.75 vs F, 90% CI 0.50-1.12; 2-sided p=0.23). ORR was 7.3% (90%CI 1.5-13.0) with F, 9.0% F+P (4.5-13.5%) and 13.0% F+P+A (5.4-20.5%). No new safety signals have been observed. Analysis of ctDNA panel sequencing encompassing 70 genes from 184 baseline samples, including correlation with known and hypothesized resistance genes, will be presented. Conclusions For ER+/HER2- breast cancer, combining palbociclib with fulvestrant beyond progression on prior CDK4/6i and AI did not significantly improve PFS compared with using fulvestrant alone. The observed longer PFS when a PD-L1 inhibitor was added to fulvestrant plus palbociclib is an intriguing signal in this ER+ population. Translational studies of blood and tumor tissue are ongoing and will be presented.
Citation Format: Erica L. Mayer, Yue Ren, Nikhil Wagle, Reshma Mahtani, Cynthia Ma, Angela DeMichele, Massimo Cristofanilli, Jane Meisel, Kathy D. Miller, Trevor Jolly, Elizabeth Riley, Rubina Qamar, Priyanka Sharma, Sonya Reid, Natalie Sinclair, Meredith Faggen, Caroline Block, Naomi Ko, Ann Partridge, Wendy Y. Chen, Michelle K. DeMeo, Victoria Attaya, Amanda Okpoebo, Yuan Liu, Eric Gauthier, Harold Burstein, Meredith Regan, Sara Tolaney. GS3-06 Palbociclib After CDK4/6i and Endocrine Therapy (PACE): A Randomized Phase II Study of Fulvestrant, Palbociclib, and Avelumab for Endocrine Pre-treated ER+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr GS3-06.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yue Ren
- 2Department of Biostatistics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
| | | | | | - Cynthia Ma
- 5Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | | | | | | | | | - Trevor Jolly
- 10University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | - Priyanka Sharma
- 13University of Kansas Medical Center Westwood, Westwood, KS, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Yuan Liu
- 24Pfizer Inc, San Diego, California
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Waks AG, Keenan TE, Li T, Tayob N, Wulf GM, Richardson ET, Attaya V, Anderson L, Mittendorf EA, Overmoyer B, Winer EP, Krop IE, Agudo J, Van Allen EM, Tolaney SM. Phase Ib study of pembrolizumab in combination with trastuzumab emtansine for metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. J Immunother Cancer 2022; 10:jitc-2022-005119. [PMID: 36252998 PMCID: PMC9577940 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2022-005119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Preclinical and clinical data support potential synergy between anti-HER2 therapy plus immune checkpoint blockade. The safety and tolerability of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) combined with pembrolizumab is unknown. Methods This was a single-arm phase Ib trial (registration date January 26, 2017) of T-DM1 plus pembrolizumab in metastatic, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. Eligible patients had HER2-positive, metastatic breast cancer previously treated with taxane, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab, and were T-DM1-naïve. A dose de-escalation design was used, with a dose-finding cohort followed by an expansion cohort at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), with mandatory baseline biopsies. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Immune biomarkers were assessed using histology, protein/RNA expression, and whole exome sequencing. Associations between immune biomarkers and treatment response, and biomarker changes before and during treatment, were explored. Results 20 patients received protocol therapy. There were no dose-limiting toxicities. The RP2D was 3.6 mg/kg T-DM1 every 21 days plus 200 mg pembrolizumab every 21 days. 85% of patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (AEs) ≥grade 2, 20% of patients experienced grade 3 AEs, and no patients experienced grade >4 AEs. Four patients (20%) experienced pneumonitis (three grade 2 events; one grade 3 event). ORR was 20% (95% CI 5.7% to 43.7%), and median PFS was 9.6 months (95% CI 2.8 to 16.0 months). Programmed cell death ligand-1 and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes did not correlate with response in this small cohort. Conclusions T-DM1 plus pembrolizumab was a safe and tolerable regimen. Ongoing trials will define if there is a role for checkpoint inhibition in the management of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Trial registration number NCT03032107.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrienne G Waks
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA,Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Tanya E Keenan
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Tianyu Li
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nabihah Tayob
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Gerburg M Wulf
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA,Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Edward T Richardson
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA,Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | - Elizabeth A Mittendorf
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA,Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA,Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Beth Overmoyer
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA,Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Eric P Winer
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA,Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA,Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Ian E Krop
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA,Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA,Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Judith Agudo
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA,Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Eliezer M Van Allen
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA,Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sara M Tolaney
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA,Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Barroso-Sousa R, Forman J, Collier K, Weber ZT, Jammihal TR, Kao KZ, Richardson ET, Keenan T, Cohen O, Manos MP, Brennick RC, Ott PA, Hodi FS, Dillon DA, Attaya V, O'Meara T, Lin NU, Van Allen EM, Rodig S, Winer EP, Mittendorf EA, Wu CJ, Wagle N, Stover DG, Shukla SA, Tolaney SM. Multidimensional Molecular Profiling of Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Benefit. JCO Precis Oncol 2022; 6:e2100413. [PMID: 35797509 PMCID: PMC9848556 DOI: 10.1200/po.21.00413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC), consistent biomarkers of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy benefit remain elusive. We evaluated the immune, genomic, and transcriptomic landscape of mTNBC in patients treated with ICIs. METHODS We identified 29 patients with mTNBC treated with pembrolizumab or atezolizumab, either alone (n = 9) or in combination with chemotherapy (n = 14) or targeted therapy (n = 6), who had tumor tissue and/or blood available before ICI therapy for whole-exome sequencing. RNA sequencing and CIBERSORTx-inferred immune population analyses were performed (n = 20). Immune cell populations and programmed death-ligand 1 expression were assessed using multiplexed immunofluorescence (n = 18). Clonal trajectories were evaluated via serial tumor/circulating tumor DNA whole-exome sequencing (n = 4). Association of biomarkers with progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) was assessed. RESULTS Progression-free survival and OS were longer in patients with high programmed death-ligand 1 expression and tumor mutational burden. Patients with longer survival also had a higher relative inferred fraction of CD8+ T cells, activated CD4+ memory T cells, M1 macrophages, and follicular helper T cells and enrichment of inflammatory gene expression pathways. A mutational signature of defective repair of DNA damage by homologous recombination was enriched in patients with both shorter OS and primary resistance. Exploratory analysis of clonal evolution among four patients treated with programmed cell death protein 1 blockade and a tyrosine kinase inhibitor suggested that clonal stability post-treatment was associated with short time to progression. CONCLUSION This study identified potential biomarkers of response to ICIs among patients with mTNBC: high tumor mutational burden; presence of CD8+, CD4 memory T cells, follicular helper T cells, and M1 macrophages; and inflammatory gene expression pathways. Pretreatment deficiencies in the homologous recombination DNA damage repair pathway and the absence of or minimal clonal evolution post-treatment may be associated with worse outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Juliet Forman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.,Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA.,Translational Immunogenomics Lab, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Tejas R Jammihal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Katrina Z Kao
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | - Tanya Keenan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Ofir Cohen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Michael P Manos
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Ryan C Brennick
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Patrick A Ott
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - F Stephen Hodi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Deborah A Dillon
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Victoria Attaya
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Tess O'Meara
- Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Nancy U Lin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.,Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | | | - Scott Rodig
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Eric P Winer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.,Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Elizabeth A Mittendorf
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA.,Divison of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Catherine J Wu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Nikhil Wagle
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.,Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | | | - Sachet A Shukla
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.,Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA.,Translational Immunogenomics Lab, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Sara M Tolaney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.,Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bardia A, Coates JT, Spring L, Sun S, Juric D, Thimmiah N, Niemierko A, Ryan P, Partridge A, Peppercorn J, Parsons H, Wander S, Pierce K, Attaya V, Fitzgerald D, Lormil B, Shellock M, Nagayama A, Bossuyt V, Moy B, Tolaney S, Ellisen L. Abstract 2638: Sacituzumab Govitecan, combination with PARP inhibitor, Talazoparib, in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC): Translational investigation. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-2638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Sacituzumab Govitecan (SG), the first antibody-drug conjugate approved for metastatic TNBC (mTNBC), is comprised of SN-38 (active metabolite of irinotecan), a topoisomerase I (TOP1) inhibitor, coupled via a hydrolyzable linker to monoclonal antibody targeting trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (Trop-2), an antigen overexpressed in mTNBC. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) block resolution of TOP1 cleavage complexes (TOP1CCs) induced by TOP1 inhibitors, thus unmasking the inability of remaining pathways to repair DNA damage. However, previous clinical trials combining PARPi with standard TOP1 inhibitors (irinotecan, topotecan) were terminated early due to dose-limiting myelosuppression. We evaluated the combination of SG with PARP inhibitor in both pre-clinical models and phase 1b clinical trial.
Methods and Results: In pre-clinical models we demonstrated that the targeted antibody-based delivery of SN-38 increased the ratio of tumor-to-normal cell SN-38, resulting in stabilized TOP1CCs, enhanced DNA damage and increased cytotoxicity with the combination, selectively in tumor cells but not normal cells, despite temporal separation of SG and PARPi exposure. To validate the hypothesis, we conducted a phase 1b investigator-initiated clinical trial combining SG with PARPi (talazoparib) in patients with mTNBC (NCT04039230). Inclusion criteria included female patients ≥ 18 years of age with mTNBC (per ASCO/CAP guidelines) and previous treatment with at least one prior therapeutic regimen for mTNBC. Clinical outcomes were assessed by Objective Response Rate per RECIST v1.1. In the phase 1b clinical trial (SG day 18, every 21 days with talazoparib), the staggered schedule with supportive therapy was relatively well-tolerated without DLTs, as predicted by the pre-clinical models. Furthermore, the staggered schedule demonstrated promising clinical activity. Molecular analysis of paired pre-treatment and on-treatment specimens demonstrated γ-H2AX accumulation, confirming pharmacodynamic inhibition with combination therapy. The dose-escalation portion of clinical trial successfully completed enrollment with a recommended phase-2 dose (R2PD) of sequential SG (10 mg/kg on days 1,8) with talazoparib (1 mg on days 15-21), every 21 days.
Conclusion: Staggered dosing of SG and PARPi, leveraging the selective drug delivery mechanism of SG to minimize toxicity while maintaining efficacy, was feasible and demonstrated encouraging evidence of clinical activity with objective responses among patients with mTNBC. The translational study highlights how mechanistic insights and innovative scheduling could be utilized to develop promising drug combinations, including previously rejected combinations, for patients with mTNBC.
Citation Format: Aditya Bardia, James T. Coates, Laura Spring, Sheng Sun, Dejan Juric, Nayana Thimmiah, Andrzej Niemierko, Phoebe Ryan, Ann Partridge, Jeffrey Peppercorn, Heather Parsons, Seth Wander, Kelsey Pierce, Victoria Attaya, Donna Fitzgerald, Brenda Lormil, Maria Shellock, Aiko Nagayama, Veerle Bossuyt, Bev Moy, Sara Tolaney, Leif Ellisen. Sacituzumab Govitecan, combination with PARP inhibitor, Talazoparib, in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC): Translational investigation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 2638.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditya Bardia
- 1Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | | | - Laura Spring
- 1Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Sheng Sun
- 1Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Dejan Juric
- 1Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Phoebe Ryan
- 1Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | - Seth Wander
- 1Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | - Brenda Lormil
- 1Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Maria Shellock
- 1Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Aiko Nagayama
- 1Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Veerle Bossuyt
- 1Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Bev Moy
- 1Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | | | - Leif Ellisen
- 1Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Barroso-Sousa R, Li T, Reddy S, Emens LA, Overmoyer B, Lange P, Dilullo MK, Attaya V, Kimmel J, Winer EP, Mittendorf EA, Tayob N, Tolaney SM. Abstract GS2-10: Nimbus: A phase 2 trial of nivolumab plus ipilimumab for patients with hypermutated her2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-gs2-10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: While high tumor mutational burden (TMB-H) has been used as a tissue-agnostic biomarker for approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), there is a paucity of data regarding efficacy of ICI in TMB-H MBC. The aim of this study was to evaluate if patients with TMB-H HER2-negative MBC benefit from the combination of nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Methods: This is an open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase 2 study assessing the efficacy of nivolumab 3 mg/kg intravenously (IV) every 14 days plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg IV every 6 weeks in subjects with TMB-H HER2-negative MBC. Eligible patients were required to have measurable HER2-negative MBC, TMB ≥9 Mut/Mb assessed by a cancer-gene panel evaluating > 300 genes and performed in a CLIA-certified laboratory, and 0-3 prior lines of chemotherapy in the advanced setting. The primary objective was overall response rate (ORR) according to RECIST 1.1. Secondary objectives include safety and tolerability, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The study followed a two-stage design. In the first stage, 14 patients were enrolled. The study required at least 1 objective response in order to continue to the second stage where an additional 16 patients were enrolled. At least 4 objective responses among the 30 patients would suggest the regimen is worthy of further study. If the true response rate is 25%, the chance that the regimen is declared worthy of further study is > 90%. Tumor biopsies, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, circulating tumor DNA, and stool collection were mandatory and were obtained at baseline and on treatment (end of cycle 1). Results: From February 2019 to June 2021, 31 patients were enrolled across 3 different academic institutions. Among 30 patients who initiated study treatment, the median age was 63 yo, 20 had hormone-receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer and 10 had triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and median number of prior lines of chemotherapy was 1.5 (0-3). Among the 10 patients with TNBC, PD-L1 status was known in 7 patients (3 positive and 4 negative). Median TMB was 10.9 Mut/Mb and 16.7% (n = 5) of patients had a TMB ≥14 mut/Mb. After a median follow-up of 9.7 (4.4 - 16.4) months, 4 (13.3%) patients achieved a confirmed objective response (all partial responses) meeting the primary endpoint of this study. The median duration of response has not been reached and 3 of these patients are still progression-free for at least 15 months. Two patients have short follow-up, and one has an unconfirmed partial response and the other has a stable disease at the time of the data cut. Median PFS and OS was respectively 1.4 (95% CI 1.3 - 9.5) months and 8.8 (95% CI 4.2 - not reached). Exploratory analysis did not show a difference in response rate according to HR status and PD-L1 status (data not shown) but tumors with TMB ≥14 mut/Mb had a response rate of 60% vs 4% in the group with TMB between ≥9 and <14 mut/Mb (p = 0.01). The treatment was associated with a favorable toxicity profile, with only three patients developing grade 3 immune-related adverse events (1 had adrenal insufficiency and cardiac troponin elevation, and two other had hepatitis). There were no reported grade 4-5 events. Data regarding TIL, PD-L1 and CD8 immunohistochemistry will be presented at the symposium. Conclusion: This study of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in TMB-H MBC achieved the primary endpoint and demonstrated a confirmed ORR of 13.3%. While patients with TMB ≥ 14 Mut/Mb were minority in this study, the 60% of ORR in this subgroup highlights the need to better evaluate the optimal TMB cutoff to predict benefit to immunotherapy in MBC.
Citation Format: Romualdo Barroso-Sousa, Tianyu Li, Sangeetha Reddy, Leisha A. Emens, Beth Overmoyer, Paulina Lange, Molly K Dilullo, Victoria Attaya, Jeffrey Kimmel, Eric P. Winer, Elizabeth A. Mittendorf, Nabihah Tayob, Sara M. Tolaney. Nimbus: A phase 2 trial of nivolumab plus ipilimumab for patients with hypermutated her2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS2-10.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tianyu Li
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Sangeetha Reddy
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Garrido-Castro AC, Graham N, Bi K, Park J, Fu J, Keenan T, Richardson ET, Pastorello R, Lange P, Attaya V, Wesolowski R, Sinclair N, Lucas Z, Lo S, Tung N, Faggen M, Kaufman PA, Block CC, Briccetti F, Toke M, Chen W, Wucherpfennig K, Marx S, Tian Y, Agudo J, Guerriero JL, Schnitt S, Lin NU, Winer EP, Mittendorf EA, Tayob N, Van Allen E, Tolaney SM. Abstract P2-14-18: A randomized phase II trial of carboplatin with or without nivolumab in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-p2-14-18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Platinum agents induce DNA crosslinking and cause accumulation of genotoxic stress, which leads to immune activation via IFN-γ signaling, making the combination with nivolumab (PD-1 antibody) an attractive strategy to enhance the benefit of either agent alone in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). Methods: In this phase II open-label, investigator-initiated, multicenter trial, patients with unresectable locally advanced or mTNBC treated with 0-1 prior lines of chemotherapy in the metastatic setting were randomized 1:1 to carboplatin (AUC 6) with or without nivolumab (360 mg) IV every 3 weeks. Stratification factors included: germline BRCA (gBRCA) status, prior neo/adjuvant platinum, and number of prior lines of metastatic therapy. After approval of PD-L1 inhibition for mTNBC, the study was amended to include first-line mTNBC only and PD-L1 status was added as a stratification factor. Patients randomized to carboplatin alone were allowed to crossover at progression to receive nivolumab (+ nab-paclitaxel post-amendment). The primary objective was to compare progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST 1.1 criteria of carboplatin with or without nivolumab in first-line mTNBC in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Key secondary objectives were objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), clinical benefit rate, and duration and time to objective response. PD-L1 status was confirmed centrally using the SP142 Ventana assay (positive, ≥1% IC). Paired research biopsies at baseline, on-treatment and at progression were performed, if safely accessible. The trial closed to accrual prior to reaching target accrual due to approval of PD-1 inhibition in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy for PD-L1+ mTNBC. Results: Between 1/30/2018 and 12/9/2020, 78 patients enrolled. Three patients did not receive protocol treatment, and the safety analysis was conducted among the 75 that received any treatment; 37 received carboplatin + nivolumab (Arm A), 38 received carboplatin alone (Arm B). Median age was 59.1 yrs (range: 25.4-75.8). Four patients (5.3%) had a known gBRCA1/2 mutation. Sixty-two (82.7%) patients received 0 prior lines (ITT population) and 13 (17.3%) 1 prior line of metastatic therapy. Sixty-seven patients (89.3%) experienced any grade ≥2 treatment-related adverse event (AE). The most frequent AE were platelet count decrease (n=40; 53.3%), anemia (n=36; 48.0%), neutrophil count decrease (n=33; 44.0%) and fatigue (n=24; 32.0%). Grade 3/4 AE were observed in 46 (61.3%) patients, and there was one grade 5 AE (COVID19 pneumonia). Any grade ≥2 immune-related AE (irAE) were observed in 25 of the 37 (67.6%) patients treated with carboplatin + nivolumab. Grade 3/4 irAE were observed in 11 (29.7%) patients. In the ITT population (32 on Arm A; 30 on Arm B), median PFS was 4.2 months with carboplatin + nivolumab, and 5.5 months with carboplatin (stratified HR 0.98, 95% CI [0.51 - 1.88]; p=0.95). ORR was 25% vs. 23.3%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 23.5 months, median OS was 17.5 months vs. 10.7 months (stratified HR 0.63, 95% CI [0.32 - 1.24]; p=0.18). In patients with PD-L1+ mTNBC (13 on Arm A; 11 on Arm B), median PFS was 8.3 months and 4.7 months, respectively (stratified HR 0.63, 95% CI [0.21 - 1.89]; p=0.41). ORR was 23.1% vs. 27.3%, respectively. Median OS was 17.5 months vs. 9.6 months (stratified HR 0.59, 95% CI [0.20 - 1.75]; p=0.34). Conclusions: Addition of nivolumab to carboplatin in patients with previously untreated mTNBC, unselected by PD-L1 status, did not significantly improve PFS. A trend toward improved PFS and OS was observed in patients with PD-L1+ mTNBC. Tissue, blood and intestinal microbiome biomarker analyses are planned; bulk tumor and single-cell sequencing, and TCR sequencing in peripheral blood are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03414684.
Citation Format: Ana C Garrido-Castro, Noah Graham, Kevin Bi, Jihye Park, Jingxin Fu, Tanya Keenan, Edward Thomas Richardson, Ricardo Pastorello, Paulina Lange, Victoria Attaya, Robert Wesolowski, Natalie Sinclair, Zarah Lucas, Steve Lo, Nadine Tung, Meredith Faggen, Peter A Kaufman, Caroline C Block, Fred Briccetti, Madhavi Toke, Wendy Chen, Kai Wucherpfennig, Sascha Marx, Ye Tian, Judith Agudo, Jennifer L Guerriero, Stuart Schnitt, Nancy U Lin, Eric P Winer, Elizabeth A Mittendorf, Nabihah Tayob, Eliezer Van Allen, Sara M Tolaney. A randomized phase II trial of carboplatin with or without nivolumab in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-14-18.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Kevin Bi
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
| | - Jihye Park
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Jingxin Fu
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Zarah Lucas
- Northern Light, Eastern Maine Medical Center, Bangor, ME
| | | | - Nadine Tung
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Wendy Chen
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Ye Tian
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bardia A, Spring L, Juric D, Partridge A, Ligibel J, Kuter I, Peppercorn J, Parsons H, Ryan P, Chawla D, Attaya V, Fitzgerald D, Viscosi E, Lormill B, Shellock M, Moy B, Tolaney S, Ellisen L. 358TiP Phase Ib/II study of antibody-drug conjugate, sacituzumab govitecan, in combination with the PARP inhibitor, talazoparib, in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|