Diltiazem and mibefradil increase the plasma concentrations and greatly enhance the adrenal-suppressant effect of oral methylprednisolone

Creation of a new class of radiosensitizers for glioblastoma based on the mibefradil pharmacophore

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary malignant tumor of the central nervous system with a dismal prognosis. Locoregional failure is common despite high doses of radiation therapy, which has prompted great interest in developing novel strategies to radiosensitize these cancers. Our group previously identified a calcium channel blocker (CCB), mibefradil, as a potential GBM radiosensitizer. We discovered that mibefradil selectively inhibits a key DNA repair pathway, alternative non-homologous end joining. We then initiated a phase I clinical trial that revealed promising initial efficacy of mibefradil, but further development was hampered by dose-limiting toxicities, including CCB-related cardiotoxicity, off-target hERG channel and cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYPs) interactions. Here, we show that mibefradil inhibits DNA repair independent of its CCB activity, and report a series of mibefradil analogues which lack CCB activity and demonstrate reduced hERG and CYP activity while retaining potency as DNA repair inhibitors. We present in vivo pharmacokinetic studies of the top analogues with evidence of brain penetration. We also report a targeted siRNA-based screen which suggests a possible role for mTOR and Akt in DNA repair inhibition by this class of drugs. Taken together, these data reveal a new class of mibefradil-based DNA repair inhibitors which can be further advanced into pre-clinical testing and eventually clinical trials, as potential GBM radiosensitizers.

The risk benefit ratio of glucocorticoids in SLE: have things changed over the past 40 years?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Glucocorticoids have been the mainstay of treatment in systemic lupus erythematosus for more than half a century. Despite advancements in knowledge concerning the pathophysiology of systemic lupus, the genomic/non-genomic actions of glucocorticoids, and the use of novel therapeutic agents in SLE, the burden of toxicity from glucocorticoid use remains unchanged.

RECENT FINDINGS

SLE patients receiving long-term prednisone therapy are at significant risk of morbidity due to permanent organ damage and prednisone daily dosages above 6 mg have been shown to increase the risk of future organ damage by 50%. Glucocorticoid use carries a higher risk of opportunistic infections, iatrogenic osteoporosis and avascular necrosis, an increase in risk of cardiovascular events, cataracts and glaucoma, as well as psychiatric adverse effects like psychosis and manic episodes. There are limited data regarding the relative efficacy of the different glucocorticoid formulations or dosing regimens.

SUMMARY

The use and dosing of glucocorticoids in SLE remains more art than science, although our knowledge regarding their complex genomic and non-genomic effects, as well as the resultant adverse effects, has greatly expanded over the past half a century.

Reliability and extension of quantitative prediction of CYP3A4-mediated drug interactions based on clinical data

An approach was proposed in 2007 for quantitative predictions of cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4-mediated drug-drug interactions. It is based on two characteristic parameters: the contribution ratio (CR; i.e., the fraction of victim drug clearance by CYP) and the inhibition ratio (IR) of the inhibitor. Knowledge of these parameters allows forecasting of the ratio between the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of the victim drug when given with the inhibitor and the AUC of the victim drug when it is given alone. So far, these parameters were established for 21 substrates and 17 inhibitors. The goals of our study were to test the assumption of substrate independence of the potency of inhibitors in vivo and to estimate the CR and IR for an extended list of substrates and inhibitors of CYP3A4. The assumption of independence of IRs from the substrate was evaluated on a set of eight victim drugs and eight inhibitors. Forty-four AUC ratios were available. This assumption was rejected in four cases, but it did not result in more than a twofold error in AUC ratio predictions. The extended list of substrates and inhibitors was defined by a thorough literature search. Fifty-nine AUC ratios were available for the global analysis. Final estimates of CRs and IRs were obtained for 37 substrates and 25 inhibitors, respectively. The mean prediction error of the ratios was 0.02, while the mean absolute prediction error was 0.58. Predictive distributions for 917 possible interactions were obtained, giving detailed information on some drugs or inhibitors that have been poorly studied so far.

Clinical outcomes and management of mechanism-based inhibition of cytochrome P450 3A4

Mechanism-based inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 is characterized by NADPH-, time-, and concentration-dependent enzyme inactivation, occurring when some drugs are converted by CYPs to reactive metabolites. Such inhibition of CYP3A4 can be due to the chemical modification of the heme, the protein, or both as a result of covalent binding of modified heme to the protein. The inactivation of CYP3A4 by drugs has important clinical significance as it metabolizes approximately 60% of therapeutic drugs, and its inhibition frequently causes unfavorable drug–drug interactions and toxicity. The clinical outcomes due to CYP3A4 inactivation depend on many factors associated with the enzyme, drugs, and patients. Clinical professionals should adopt proper approaches when using drugs that are mechanism-based CYP3A4 inhibitors. These include early identification of drugs behaving as CYP3A4 inactivators, rational use of such drugs (eg, safe drug combination regimen, dose adjustment, or discontinuation of therapy when toxic drug interactions occur), therapeutic drug monitoring, and predicting the risks for potential drug–drug interactions. A good understanding of CYP3A4 inactivation and proper clinical management are needed by clinical professionals when these drugs are used.

Updates on cytochrome p450-mediated cardiovascular drug interactions

Cytochrome P (CYP) 450 is a superfamily of hemoproteins that play an important role in the metabolism of steroid hormones, fatty acids, and many medications. Many agents used for management of cardiovascular diseases are substrates, inhibitors, or inducers of CYP450 enzymes. When two agents that are substrates, inhibitors, or inducers of CYP450 are administered together, drug interactions with significant clinical consequences may occur. This review discusses CYP450-mediated cardiovascular drug interactions as well as noncardiovascular drug interactions that produced significant cardiovascular side effects. The principles in predicting drug interactions are also discussed.

Updates on cytochrome P450-mediated cardiovascular drug interactions

Cytochrome P (CYP) 450 is a superfamily of hemoproteins that play an important role in the metabolism of steroid hormones, fatty acids, and many medications. Many agents used for management of cardiovascular diseases are substrates, inhibitors, or inducers of CYP450 enzymes.When two agents that are substrates, inhibitors, or inducers of CYP450 are administered together, drug interactions with significant clinical consequences may occur. This review discusses CYP450-mediated cardiovascular drug interactions as well as noncardiovascular drug interactions that produced significant cardiovascular side effects. The principles in predicting drug interactions are also discussed.

The mibefradil derivative NNC55-0396, a specific T-type calcium channel antagonist, exhibits less CYP3A4 inhibition than mibefradil

A novel mibefradil derivative, NNC55-0396, designed to be hydrolysis-resistant, was shown to be a selective T-type Ca(2+) channel inhibitor without L-type Ca(2+) channel efficacy. However, its effects on cytochromes P450 (P450s) have not previously been examined. We investigated the inhibitory effects of NNC55-0396 toward seven major recombinant human P450s--CYP3A4, CYP2D6, CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C8, CYPC19, and CYP2E1--and compared its effects with those of mibefradil and its hydrolyzed metabolite, Ro40-5966. Our results show that CYP3A4 and CYP2D6 are the two P450s most affected by mibefradil, Ro40-5966, and NNC55-0396. Mibefradil (IC(50) = 33 +/- 3 nM, K(i) = 23 +/- 0.5 nM) and Ro40-5966 (IC(50) = 30 +/- 7.8 nM, K(i) = 21 +/- 2.8 nM) have a 9- to 10-fold greater inhibitory activity toward recombinant CYP3A4 benzyloxy-4-trifluoromethylcoumarin-O-debenzylation activity than NNC55-0396 (IC(50) = 300 +/- 30 nM, K(i) = 210 +/- 6 nM). More dramatically, mibefradil (IC(50) = 566 +/- 71 nM, K(i) = 202 +/- 39 nM) shows 19-fold higher inhibition of CYP3A-associated testosterone 6beta-hydroxylase activity in human liver microsomes compared with NNC55-0396 (IC(50) = 11 +/- 1.1 microM, K(i) = 3.9 +/- 0.4 microM). Loss of testosterone 6beta-hydroxylase activity by recombinant CYP3A4 was shown to be time- and concentration-dependent with both compounds. However, NNC55-0396 (K(I) = 3.87 microM, K(inact) = 0.061/min) is a much less potent mechanism-based inhibitor than mibefradil (K(I) = 83 nM, K(inact) = 0.048/min). In contrast, NNC55-0396 (IC(50) = 29 +/- 1.2 nM, K(i) = 2.8 +/- 0.3 nM) and Ro40-5966 (IC(50) = 46 +/- 11 nM, K(i) = 4.5 +/- 0.02 nM) have a 3- to 4-fold greater inhibitory activity toward recombinant CYP2D6 than mibefradil (IC(50) = 129 +/- 21 nM, K(i) = 12.7 +/- 0.9 nM). Our results suggest that NNC55-0396 could be a more favorable T-type Ca(2+) antagonist than its parent compound, mibefradil, which was withdrawn from the market because of strong inhibition of CYP3A4.

Methylprednisolone exposure in pediatric renal transplant patients

Glucocorticoid (GC) dosing is commonly based on body mass or surface area in children, although the drug effects appear to correlate with steroid exposure, rather than dose. We compared the area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) of methylprednisolone (MP) with a recombinant cell bioassay measuring serum glucocorticoid bioactivity (GBA), in prediction of side effects in 16 pediatric patients (5.4-18.4 years of age) 2.0-14.9 years after renal transplantation (TX). They received 0.3 mg/kg of MP orally and timed blood samples were drawn up to 8 h postdose. Serum MP concentrations correlated moderately with GBA (r= 0.65, p < 0.0001) with best linear fit at 6 and 8 h (r= 0.72, 0.79, respectively, p < 0.001). MP-AUC(t = 0-8) and GBA(t = 6) were significantly greater in patients who gained excessive weight soon after TX. Change in growth after TX was inversely correlated with MP-AUC (r= 0.73, p < 0.05) and GBA(t = 6) (r= 0.62, p < 0.05). No correlation of MP-AUC or GBA was found with blood glucose or serum lipid concentrations, glomerular filtration rate, bone mineral density or graft histology. In conclusion, GC exposure varies individually and dosing should be adjusted accordingly to control the adverse effects. GBA might provide a complementary tool for monitoring GC exposure but further studies are needed.

Monitoring drug-protein interaction

A variety of therapeutic drugs can undergo biotransformation via Phase I and Phase II enzymes to reactive metabolites that have intrinsic chemical reactivity toward proteins and cause potential organ toxicity. A drug-protein adduct is a protein complex that forms when electrophilic drugs or their reactive metabolite(s) covalently bind to a protein molecule. Formation of such drug-protein adducts eliciting cellular damages and immune responses has been a major hypothesis for the mechanism of toxicity caused by numerous drugs. The monitoring of protein-drug adducts is important in the kinetic and mechanistic studies of drug-protein adducts and establishment of dose-toxicity relationships. The determination of drug-protein adducts can also provide supportive evidence for diagnosis of drug-induced diseases associated with protein-drug adduct formation in patients. The plasma is the most commonly used matrix for monitoring drug-protein adducts due to its convenience and safety. Measurement of circulating antibodies against drug-protein adducts may be used as a useful surrogate marker in the monitoring of drug-protein adducts. The determination of plasma protein adducts and/or relevant antibodies following administration of several drugs including acetaminophen, dapsone, diclofenac and halothane has been conducted in clinical settings for characterizing drug toxicity associated with drug-protein adduct formation. The monitoring of drug-protein adducts often involves multi-step laboratory procedure including sample collection and preliminary preparation, separation to isolate or extract the target compound from a mixture, identification and determination. However, the monitoring of drug-protein adducts is often difficult because of short half-lives of the protein adducts, sampling problem and lack of sensitive analytical techniques for the protein adducts. Currently, chromatographic (e.g. high performance liquid chromatography) and immunological methods (e.g. enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) are two major techniques used to determine protein adducts of drugs in patients. The present review highlights the importance for clinical monitoring of drug-protein adducts, with an emphasis on methodology and with a further discussion of the application of these techniques to individual drugs and their target proteins.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of systemically administered glucocorticoids

Glucocorticoids have pleiotropic effects that are used to treat diverse diseases such as asthma, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus and acute kidney transplant rejection. The most commonly used systemic glucocorticoids are hydrocortisone, prednisolone, methylprednisolone and dexamethasone. These glucocorticoids have good oral bioavailability and are eliminated mainly by hepatic metabolism and renal excretion of the metabolites. Plasma concentrations follow a biexponential pattern. Two-compartment models are used after intravenous administration, but one-compartment models are sufficient after oral administration.The effects of glucocorticoids are mediated by genomic and possibly nongenomic mechanisms. Genomic mechanisms include activation of the cytosolic glucocorticoid receptor that leads to activation or repression of protein synthesis, including cytokines, chemokines, inflammatory enzymes and adhesion molecules. Thus, inflammation and immune response mechanisms may be modified. Nongenomic mechanisms might play an additional role in glucocorticoid pulse therapy. Clinical efficacy depends on glucocorticoid pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Pharmacokinetic parameters such as the elimination half-life, and pharmacodynamic parameters such as the concentration producing the half-maximal effect, determine the duration and intensity of glucocorticoid effects. The special contribution of either of these can be distinguished with pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis. We performed simulations with a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model using T helper cell counts and endogenous cortisol as biomarkers for the effects of methylprednisolone. These simulations suggest that the clinical efficacy of low-dose glucocorticoid regimens might be increased with twice-daily glucocorticoid administration.

Co-prescription of cytochrome P450 2D6/3A4 inhibitor-substrate pairs in clinical practice. A retrospective analysis of data from Norwegian primary pharmacies

OBJECTIVE

Inhibition of cytochrome P (P450) (CYP) enzymes, in particular CYP3A4 and CYP2D6, is an important drug-interacting mechanism. The objective of our study was to assess how frequently CYP3A4 and CYP2D6 inhibitors are co-prescribed with substrates of the respective enzymes.

METHODS

Included inhibitors were clarithromycin, erythromycin, fluconazole, itraconazole, ketoconazole and nefazodone (CYP3A4 inhibitors) and bupropion, fluoxetine, paroxetine and terbinafine (CYP2D6 inhibitors). The inhibitors were combined with substrates shown to be pharmacokinetically sensitive towards inhibition (190 drug pairs in total). Lists of patients receiving inhibitors and substrates were drawn from prescription databases (approximately 43,500 patients) of three Norwegian primary pharmacies during a 6-month period (July 2002 to January 2003). The lists were matched on name and date of birth to identify patients using drug pairs. Concurrent use was made probable from dates of purchase and drug profiles.

RESULTS

Inhibitors were prescribed to 2,062 patients. Altogether, 369 events of substrate co-prescription were registered. The highest frequencies of co-prescribed substrates were found for paroxetine (101 events per 267 patients, 38%), fluoxetine (36 events per 110 patients, 33%) and clarithromycin (59 events per 242 patients, 24%). The drugs most often detected in combination with inhibitors were codeine (116 events) and metoprolol (38 events) for CYP2D6 and zopiclone (45 events) and simvastatin (26 events) for CYP3A4.

CONCLUSION

Several commonly used CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 inhibitors are frequently co-prescribed with substrates in Norwegian clinical practice. Alertness when inhibitors are prescribed would aid physicians and pharmacists to detect many drug combinations with potential interaction risk.

Oral erythromycin and the risk of sudden death from cardiac causes

BACKGROUND

Oral erythromycin prolongs cardiac repolarization and is associated with case reports of torsades de pointes. Because erythromycin is extensively metabolized by cytochrome P-450 3A (CYP3A) isozymes, commonly used medications that inhibit the effects of CYP3A may increase plasma erythromycin concentrations, thereby increasing the risk of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death. We studied the association between the use of erythromycin and the risk of sudden death from cardiac causes and whether this risk was increased with the concurrent use of strong inhibitors of CYP3A.

METHODS

We studied a previously identified Tennessee Medicaid cohort that included 1,249,943 person-years of follow-up and 1476 cases of confirmed sudden death from cardiac causes. The CYP3A inhibitors used in the study were nitroimidazole antifungal agents, diltiazem, verapamil, and troleandomycin; each doubles, at least, the area under the time-concentration curve for a CYP3A substrate. Amoxicillin, an antimicrobial agent with similar indications but which does not prolong cardiac repolarization, and former use of erythromycin also were studied, to assess possible confounding by indication.

RESULTS

The multivariate adjusted rate of sudden death from cardiac causes among patients currently using erythromycin was twice as high (incidence-rate ratio, 2.01; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.08 to 3.75; P=0.03) as that among those who had not used any of the study antibiotic medications. There was no significant increase in the risk of sudden death among former users of erythromycin (incidence-rate ratio, 0.89; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.72 to 1.09; P=0.26) or among those who were currently using amoxicillin (incidence-rate ratio, 1.18; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.59 to 2.36; P=0.65). The adjusted rate of sudden death from cardiac causes was five times as high (incidence-rate ratio, 5.35; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.72 to 16.64; P=0.004) among those who concurrently used CYP3A inhibitors and erythromycin as that among those who had used neither CYP3A inhibitors nor any of the study antibiotic medications. In contrast, there was no increase in the risk of sudden death among those who concurrently used amoxicillin and CYP3A inhibitors or those currently using any of the study antibiotic medications who had formerly used CYP3A inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

The concurrent use of erythromycin and strong inhibitors of CYP3A should be avoided.

Immunosuppressants

Immunosuppressants are prescribed to prevent rejection of transplanted tissues and organs and are also used in the treatment of autoimmune disorders. Consultation-liaison psychiatrists increasingly encounter patients taking these agents as the number of transplant recipients increases and the indications for the use of immunosuppressants expands. These drugs have potentially deleterious physical, mental, and biochemical side effects. In addition, transplant recipients and patients with autoimmune disorders commonly have comorbid illnesses that require pharmacologic treatment. The management of these patients is challenging secondary to the severity of these illnesses, the number of medications prescribed, and the potential for adverse drug-drug interactions. Knowledge of the pharmacokinetic properties of these drugs and the potential for serious drug-drug interactions that cause alterations in serum levels of the immunosuppressant medications is essential. Increased serum levels may cause serious toxic effects and decreased serum levels may lead to rejection of the transplanted organ or worsening of the autoimmune disorder. Adverse events may also occur when serum levels of medications prescribed for comorbid illnesses are altered by administration of immunosuppressants. The pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction profiles of the glucocorticoids, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, and monoclonal antibodies are discussed in this review.

Lack of a Fluoxetine Effect on Prednisolone Disposition and Cortisol Suppression

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the potential effect of fluoxetine, a cytochrome P450 isoenzyme inhibitor, on prednisolone disposition and cortisol suppression.

DESIGN

Sequential, two-phase, crossover, open-label pharmacokinetic study.

SETTING

General clinical research center.

SUBJECTS

Fourteen healthy volunteers.

INTERVENTION

A single intravenous dose of prednisolone 40 mg before and after 14 days of treatment with fluoxetine 20 mg/day for 5 days followed by 60 mg/day for 9 days to achieve steady-state concentrations.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Pharmacokinetic parameters of the prednisolone and resulting pharmacodynamic effects on the time course of plasma cortisol suppression before and after fluoxetine administration were evaluated. No significant differences were observed for the mean +/- SD area under the prednisolone concentration-time curve (3739 +/- 992 vs 3498 +/- 797 microg x hr/L, respectively), clearance (8.58 +/- 2.62 vs 8.92 +/- 2.05 L/hr, respectively), volume of distribution (39.5 +/- 12.4 vs 38.2 +/- 9.9 L, respectively), elimination half-life (3.32 +/- 0.83 vs 3.05 +/- 0.80 hrs, respectively), or duration of plasma cortisol suppression (23.5 +/- 3.1 vs 22.0 +/- 4.2 hrs, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Fluoxetine administration did not significantly affect prednisolone disposition or prolong cortisol suppression. This finding suggests that coadministration of these agents is unlikely to result in clinically important pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic drug interactions. Prednisolone may be a useful alternative for patients who require both glucocorticoid and fluoxetine therapy.

Cushing's syndrome due to interaction between inhaled corticosteroids and itraconazole

OBJECTIVE

To report a case of an interaction between inhaled corticosteroids and itraconazole causing iatrogenic Cushing's syndrome and provide a review of the relevant literature.

CASE SUMMARY

A 70-year-old white woman on long-term treatment with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids for asthma was diagnosed as having Scedosporium apiospermum infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissues. As a result, she was treated with itraconazole for 2 months. She subsequently developed Cushing's syndrome due to a probable cytochrome P450-mediated interaction between itraconazole and budesonide. She also had secondary adrenal insufficiency requiring prolonged treatment with replacement hydrocortisone.

DISCUSSION

Budesonide is a potent glucocorticoid that is metabolized in the liver by the CYP3A4 isoenzyme to inactive metabolites. Itraconazole is a potent cytochrome P450 inhibitor. It can inhibit the metabolism of oral or inhaled corticosteroids, producing cortisol excess leading to Cushing's syndrome and adrenal insufficiency. An assessment of causality indicated a possible adverse interaction between itraconazole and budesonide.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of itraconazole and inhaled corticosteroids is increasingly being used to treat conditions such as allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Clinicians need to be aware of the potential for an interaction between such a combination.

Drug interactions in dentistry

BACKGROUND

The hepatic and intestinal cytochrome, or CY, P450 enzyme system is responsible for the biotransformation of a multitude of drugs. Certain medications used in dentistry can act as substrates, inducers or inhibitors of this system.

METHODS

The authors conducted a MEDLINE search of articles appearing between 1976 and the present using the keywords "drug interactions" and "cytochrome P450," and reviewed reports involving dental therapeutic agents using PubMed links from an Indiana University CYP450 drug interaction table on the World Wide Web.

RESULTS

The antibiotics erythromycin and clarithromycin are potent inhibitors of CYP3A4 and can increase blood levels and toxicity of CYP3A4 substrates. Likewise, quinolone antibiotics such as ciprofloxacin inhibit the metabolism of CYP1A2 substrates. Other dental therapeutic agents are substrates for CYP2C9 (celecoxib, ibuprofen and naproxen), CYP2D6 (codeine and tramadol), CYP3A4 (methylprednisolone) and CYP2E1 (acetaminophen). Because codeine and tramadol are prodrugs, inhibition of their metabolism can lead to a diminution of their analgesic effects. While inducers of acetaminophen metabolism, including alcohol, theoretically can increase the proportion of it that is biotransformed into a potentially hepatotoxic metabolite, recent research suggests that concomitant alcohol intake does not increase the hepatotoxic potential of therapeutic doses of acetaminophen.

CONCLUSIONS

A number of clinically significant drug interactions can arise with dental therapeutic agents that act as substrates or inhibitors of the CYP450 system. Clinical Implications. As polypharmacy continues to increase, the likelihood of adverse drug interactions in dentistry will increase as well. Ensuring that patients' medical histories are up to date and acquiring knowledge of the various substrates, inducers and inhibitors of the CYP450 system will help practitioners avoid potentially serious adverse drug interactions.

Nefazodone inhibits methylprednisolone disposition and enhances its adrenal-suppressant effect

Nefazodone is a potent and selective inhibitor of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4), an enzyme pathway responsible for the biotransformation of a number of steroid compounds. The potential therefore exists that nefazodone inhibits the disposition of methylprednisolone. In this open label, repeated measures study, the effect of 9 days of nefazodone administration on the pharmacokinetic disposition of a single 0.6 mg/kg intravenous dose of methylprednisolone was assessed. Additionally the effect of concomitant nefazodone use on duration of cortisol suppression after methylprednisolone administration was assessed. Eight healthy volunteers completed the study. Following nefazodone administration, the mean (+/-SD) area under the methylprednisolone concentration-time curve was significantly higher (1393 +/- 343 vs. 2966 +/- 928 ug*h/L; P < 0.005), apparent clearance was lower (28.7 +/- 7.2 vs. 14.6 +/- 7.8 L/h; P < 0.02) and the terminal elimination half-life was longer (2.28 +/- 0.49 vs. 3.32 +/- 0.95 hours; P < 0.02). The duration of cortisol suppression after methylprednisolone administration was longer (> or =32 vs. 23.3 +/- 3.43 hours) during nefazodone administration.

Immunosuppressants

This edition of the Med-Psych Drug-Drug Interactions Update begins a change in format. Starting with this column, each column will feature one drug-drug interaction (DDI) topic that will be explored in depth. This edition features DDIs associated with the commonly used immunosuppressants. These drugs are frequently encountered by consultation-liaison psychiatrists in tertiary care settings. Generally, most of these drugs have narrow safety and therapeutic windows; therefore, other drugs that change their serum levels can have deleterious effects. In this review, the DDI profiles of cyclosporine, tacrolimus, sirolimus, and the corticosteroids are explored.