Selective dual nuclear scanning in low-risk patients with chest pain to reliably identify and exclude acute coronary syndromes

Chest pain: coronary CT in the ER

Cardiac CT has developed into a robust clinical tool during the past 15 years. Of the fields in which the potential of cardiac CT has raised more interest is chest pain in acute settings. In fact, the possibility to exclude with high reliability obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients at low-to-intermediate risk is of great interest both from the clinical standpoint and from the management standpoint. Several other modalities, with or without imaging, have been used during the past decades in the settings of new onset chest pain or in acute chest pain for both diagnostic and prognostic assessment of CAD. Each one has advantages and disadvantages. Most imaging modalities also focus on inducible ischaemia to guide referral to invasive coronary angiography. The advent of cardiac CT has introduced a new practice diagnostic paradigm, being the most accurate non-invasive method for identification and exclusion of CAD. Furthermore, the detection of subclinical CAD and plaque imaging offer the opportunity to improve risk stratification. Moreover, recent advances of the latest generation CT scanners allow combining both anatomical and functional imaging by stress myocardial perfusion. The role of cardiac CT in acute settings is already important and will become progressively more important in the coming years.

Imaging strategies for acute chest pain in the emergency department

OBJECTIVE

Echocardiography, radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), and coronary CT angiography (CTA) are the three main imaging techniques used in the emergency department for the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The purpose of this article is to quantitatively examine existing evidence about the diagnostic performance of these imaging tests in this setting.

CONCLUSION

Our systematic search of the medical literature showed no significant difference between the modalities for the detection of ACS in the emergency department. There was a slight, positive trend favoring coronary CTA. Given the absence of large differences in diagnostic performance, practical aspects such as local practice, expertise, medical facilities, and individual patient characteristics may be more important.

Risk stratification in chest pain patients undergoing nuclear stress testing: the Erlanger Stress Score

BACKGROUND

Studies have individually reported the relationship of age, cardiac risk factors, and history of preexisting coronary artery disease (CAD) for predicting acute coronary syndromes in chest pain patients undergoing cardiac stress testing. In this study, we investigate the interplay of all these factors on the incidence of acute coronary syndromes to develop a tool that may assist physicians in the selection of appropriate chest pain patients for stress testing.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of a prospectively acquired database of consecutive chest pain patients undergoing nuclear stress testing. Backward stepwise logistic regression was used to develop a model for predicting risk of 30-day acute coronary events (ACE) using information obtained from age, sex, cardiac risk factors, and history of preexisting CAD.

RESULTS

A total of 800 chest pain patients underwent nuclear stress testing. ACE occurred in 74 patients (9.3%). Logistic regression analysis found only 6 factors predictive of ACE: age, male sex, preexisting CAD, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia. Area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of this model for predicting ACE was 0.767 (95% confidence interval, 0.719-0.815). There were no cases of ACE in the 173 patients with predicted probability estimates ≤2.5% (95% confidence interval, 0%-2.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

A regression model using age, sex, preexisting CAD, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia is predictive of 30-day ACE in chest pain patients undergoing nuclear stress testing. Prospective studies need to be performed to determine whether this model can assist physicians in the selection of appropriate low-to-intermediate risk chest pain patients for nuclear stress testing.

Improving risk stratification in patients with chest pain: the Erlanger HEARTS3 score

BACKGROUND

The HEART score uses elements from patient History, Electrocardiogram, Age, Risk Factors, and Troponin to obtain a risk score on a 0- to 10-point scale for predicting acute coronary syndromes (ACS). This investigation seeks to improve on the HEART score by proposing the HEARTS(3) score, which uses likelihood ratio analysis to give appropriate weight to the individual elements of the HEART score as well as incorporating 3 additional "S" variables: Sex, Serial 2-hour electrocardiogram, and Serial 2-hour delta troponin during the initial emergency department valuation.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively acquired database consisting of 2148 consecutive patients with non-ST-segment elevation chest pain. Interval analysis of likelihood ratios was performed to determine appropriate weighting of the individual elements of the HEART(3) score. Primary outcomes were 30-day ACS and myocardial infarction.

RESULTS

There were 315 patients with 30-day ACS and 1833 patients without ACS. Likelihood ratio analysis revealed significant discrepancies in weight of the 5 individual elements shared by the HEART and HEARTS(3) score. The HEARTS(3) score outperformed the HEART score as determined by comparison of areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for myocardial infarction (0.958 vs 0.825; 95% confidence interval difference in areas, 0.105-0.161) and for 30-day ACS (0.901 vs 0.813; 95% confidence interval difference in areas, 0.064-0.110).

CONCLUSION

The HEARTS(3) score reliably risk stratifies patients with chest pain for 30-day ACS. Prospective studies need to be performed to determine if implementation of this score as a decision support tool can guide treatment and disposition decisions in the management of patients with chest pain.

Is coronary computed tomography angiography a resource sparing strategy in the risk stratification and evaluation of acute chest pain? Results of a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

Annually, almost 6 million U.S. citizens are evaluated for acute chest pain syndromes (ACPSs), and billions of dollars in resources are utilized. A large part of the resource utilization results from precautionary hospitalizations that occur because care providers are unable to exclude the presence of coronary artery disease (CAD) as the underlying cause of ACPSs. The purpose of this study was to examine whether the addition of coronary computerized tomography angiography (CCTA) to the concurrent standard care (SC) during an index emergency department (ED) visit could lower resource utilization when evaluating for the presence of CAD.

METHODS

Sixty participants were assigned randomly to SC or SC + CCTA groups. Participants were interviewed at the index ED visit and at 90 days. Data collected included demographics, perceptions of the value of accessing health care, and clinical outcomes. Resource utilization included services received from both the primary in-network and the primary out-of-network providers. The prospectively defined primary endpoint was the total amount of resources utilized over a 90-day follow-up period when adding CCTA to the SC risk stratification in ACPSs.

RESULTS

The mean (± standard deviation [SD]) for total resources utilized at 90 days for in-network plus out-of-network services was less for the participants in the SC + CCTA group ($10,134; SD ±$14,239) versus the SC-only group ($16,579; SD ±$19,148; p = 0.144), as was the median for the SC + CCTA ($4,288) versus SC only ($12,148; p = 0.652; median difference = -$1,291; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -$12,219 to $1,100; p = 0.652). Among the 60 total study patients, only 19 had an established diagnosis of CAD at 90 days. However, 18 (95%) of these diagnosed participants were in the SC + CCTA group. In addition, there were fewer hospital readmissions in the SC + CCTA group (6 of 30 [20%] vs. 16 of 30 [53%]; difference in proportions = -33%; 95% CI = -56% to -10%; p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Adding CCTA to the current ED risk stratification of ACPSs resulted in no difference in the quantity of resources utilized, but an increased diagnosis of CAD, and significantly less recidivism and rehospitalization over a 90-day follow-up period.

Cost-effectiveness of telemetry for hospitalized patients with low-risk chest pain

BACKGROUND

The majority of chest pain admissions originate in the emergency department (ED). Despite a low incidence of cardiac events, limited telemetry availability, and its questionable benefit, these patients are routinely admitted to a monitored setting.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to analyze the cost-effectiveness of admission to telemetry versus admission to an unmonitored hospital bed in low-risk chest pain patients and explore when the use of telemetry may be cost-effective.

METHODS

The authors constructed a decision analytic model to evaluate the scenario of an ED admission of an otherwise healthy 55-year-old patient with low-risk chest pain defined as an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) probability of 2%. Costs were estimated from 2009 Medicare data for hospital reimbursement and physician services, as well as published data on disability costs. Published studies were used to estimate the risk of ACS, cardiac arrest, time to defibrillation, survival, long-term disability, and quality of life.

RESULTS

In the base case, telemetry was more effective (0.0044 quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]) but more costly ($299.67) than a floor bed, resulting in a high marginal cost-effectiveness ratio (mCER) of $67,484.55 per QALY. In comprehensive sensitivity analyses, the mCER crossed below the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $50,000 per QALY when the following scenarios were met: the probability of ACS exceeds 3%, the probability of cardiac arrest is greater than 0.4%, the probability of shockable dysrhythmia is above 83%, the probability of delay in telemetry bed availability is below 52%, and the opportunity cost of delay to telemetry bed placement is below $119.

CONCLUSIONS

Telemetry may be a "cost-effective" use of health care resources for chest pain patients when patients have a probability of ACS above 3% or for patients with a minimal delay and cost associated with obtaining a monitored bed. Further research is needed to better stratify low-risk chest pain patients to the appropriate inpatient setting and to understand the frequency and costs associated with delays in obtaining monitored beds.

Sixty-four–slice computed tomographic coronary angiography: will the “triple rule out” change chest pain evaluation in the ED?

Sixty-four-slice computed tomographic (CT) coronary angiography is a new technique for the noninvasive visualization of the coronary arteries. It enables noninvasive detection of coronary plaque and determination of severity without instrumentation of the heart. Although not yet commonly used in the emergency department setting, it stands poised to dramatically change the way that patients with chest pain are evaluated. In addition to evaluation of the coronary arteries, CT angiography has long been used to evaluate patients for other dangerous causes of chest pain such as aortic dissection and pulmonary embolus. Although these new scanners excel at all of these diagnostic modalities, the true excitement is in the possibility of combining several different protocols into one, allowing for multiple causes of chest pain to be "ruled out" simultaneously. This article describes the current state of the art of cardiac CT, current state of research, and current areas of controversy.

The Prognostic Value of Normal Exercise Myocardial Perfusion Imaging and Exercise Echocardiography

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this work was to determine the prognostic value of normal exercise myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) tests and exercise echocardiography tests, and to determine the prognostic value of these imaging modalities in women and men.

BACKGROUND

Exercise MPI and exercise echocardiography provide prognostic information that is useful in the risk stratification of patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Cochrane, and DARE databases between January 1990 and May 2005, and reviewed bibliographies of articles obtained. We included prospective cohort studies of subjects who underwent exercise MPI or exercise echocardiography for known or suspected CAD, and provided data on primary outcomes of myocardial infarction (MI) and cardiac death with at least 3 months of follow-up. Secondary outcomes (unstable angina, revascularization procedures) were abstracted if provided. Studies performed exclusively in patients with CAD were excluded.

RESULTS

The negative predictive value (NPV) for MI and cardiac death was 98.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 98.5 to 99.0) over 36 months of follow-up for MPI, and 98.4% (95% CI 97.9 to 98.9) over 33 months for echocardiography. The corresponding annualized event rates were 0.45% per year for MPI and 0.54% per year for echocardiography. In subgroup analyses, annualized event rates were <1% for each MPI isotope, and were similar for women and men. For secondary events, MPI and echocardiography had annualized event rates of 1.25% and 0.95%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Both exercise MPI and exercise echocardiography have high NPVs for primary and secondary cardiac events. The prognostic utility of both modalities is similar for both men and women.

Chest pain: an update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chest pain is one of the most common symptoms for seeking acute medical care. Evidence of myocardial ischemia, however, can only be established in a minority of patients. The establishment or ruling out of myocardial ischemia is difficult and the cost is high. An effective rationale for ischemia detection, without unnecessary hospital admission, is needed. The development of chest pain units potentially offers a rapid, effective way of identifying patients at high risk for acute coronary syndromes, as well as those with a low probability of ischemia. Other cardiac or noncardiac causes of chest pain should also be considered.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent developments in chest pain, including the ruling in or out of ischemic pain by triage and different ischemia detection methods, are discussed. Other causes of chest pain such as esophageal, drug related, psychiatric and post-coronary bypass surgery pain are also discussed. Recent findings on syndrome X are reviewed and patients with myocardial infarction presenting without chest pain are discussed.

SUMMARY

The possibility of safely and quickly ruling out myocardial ischemia by point-of-care biochemical analyses is reviewed, which might influence our clinical handling of chest pain patients. The importance of biopsychosocial factors, pain perception, esophageal dysfunction, drugs and the coronary artery bypass procedure in itself, is discussed and vital clinical information is provided for the handling of our chest pain patients.

Noninvasive cardiac imaging in the evaluation of suspected acute coronary syndromes

Optimal management of patients presenting with chest pain to the emergency department is a major challenge, both in terms of a diagnostic dilemma and consumption of resources. The triage of such patients can be aided vastly by the appropriate use of noninvasive imaging. Noninvasive imaging modalities such as echocardiogram, radionuclide perfusion studies, positron emission tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography have all been demonstrated to have favorable diagnostic and prognostic value, with an enhanced sensitivity to detect acute ischemia. A normal noninvasive evaluation in the appropriate clinical setting presents a strong argument against acute ischemia as an etiology of the chest pain. Randomized trials of both rest and stress imaging in the emergency department have confirmed a reduction in unnecessary hospitalizations and cost savings without compromising the safety of the patient. Cardiac magnetic resonance and computed tomography would provide an insight into subendocardial ischemia, the detection of which has previously been difficult, using single-photon emission tomography and echocardiography. In this review, novel hot-spot imaging modalities are discussed including infarct-avid imaging agents and ischemia-avid imaging agents, thus elucidating the pathophysiology of reperfusion-induced cell death. These agents represent work in evolution and are likely to be used routinely in the future as understanding of coronary syndromes and coronary artery disease becomes clearer.

Chest Pain Units: Management of Special Populations

Chest pain units provide an important alternative to traditional hospital admission for patients who present to the emergency department with symptoms compatible with acute coronary syndrome and a normal or inconclusive initial evaluation. Although patient subgroups such as women, diabetics, those with established coronary artery disease,and those with symptoms related to stimulant use present unique challenges,management in a chest pain unit appears to be appropriate in these populations. Judicious application of accelerated diagnostic protocols and current testing methods can promote safe, accurate, and cost-effective risk stratification of special populations to identify patients who can be safely discharged and patients who require hospital admission for further evaluation.

Noninvasive Imaging Techniques to Aid in the Triage of Patients with Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Review

The evaluation, treatment, and disposition of patients with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the Emergency Department continues to be a clinical challenge. Many patients with suggestive symptoms are admitted to the hospital to rule out a myocardial infarction by serial enzyme tests and EKGs and receive an expedited work-up for ischemia. However, the diagnosis can be difficult, given the wide range of potentially atypical symptoms that can signal ACS, which remains a major clinical risk for patients and a liability risk for emergency physicians. This article reviews imaging technologies such as echocardiography and nuclear perfusion imaging used currently in the diagnosis of ACS and rapidly advancing technologies such as CT and MRI that may be able to visualize calcifications, plaques, occlusions, and infarctions noninvasively in real time. Some noninvasive tests used to complete an ischemia work-up after serial enzyme testing and EKGs, such as exercise EKG, stress echocardiography, and stress perfusion imaging, also are reviewed.

Improving care in patients with acute coronary syndromes: the Erlanger quality improvement initiative

Quality improvement (QI) in emergency department (ED) patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is a complex and dynamic phenomenon. ED physicians are faced with the challenge of multitasking a variety of patient complaints. This chaotic environment frequently hampers the ED physician's ability to properly evaluate and treat chest pain patients. Just as an airplane pilot would never take off without performing the comprehensive preflight operational checklist, the ED physician should have a standardized protocol for the evaluation and treatment of chest pain patients. In this report, we describe Erlanger Medical Center's 10-year QI initiative in developing a successful chest pain protocol for the rapid evaluation and treatment of patients with suspected ACS. Our initiative resulted from a collaborative effort among emergency physicians, cardiologists, nuclear radiologists, nursing staff, and administration. The systematic step-wise approach we utilized at our institution consisted of identification of the problem, development of standardized protocols, hospital-based QI initiatives, and continuation of QI efforts through national initiatives. Through this "building of bridges" among physicians, nursing, and administration, we hope that other institutions will modify our protocols to assist them in the development of their own successful QI program for improving the evaluation, treatment, and disposition of patients with suspected ACS.

Outcome of low-risk patients discharged home after a normal cardiac troponin I

Patients with symptoms suggestive of, but at low risk for, acute coronary syndrome (ACS), who have a negative electrocardiogram (EKG) and a single normal troponin I at 6-9 h after symptom onset are frequently discharged from our Emergency Department (ED). We sought to determine their rate of adverse cardiac events at 30 days (ACE-30), defined as cardiac death or myocardial infarction (MI), by chart review, telephone interview, or county death records. Of 663 patients, data were available for 588 (89%). Mean age was 48 years; 59% were male. There were 390 patients (66%) who complained of chest pain. Previous coronary artery disease (CAD) was reported in 145 patients (25%). Two patients (0.34%) had ACE-30, both with non-ST elevation MI. There were no cases of cardiac death. None of the patients died in Hennepin County within 30 days. At our institution, low-risk patients with symptoms suggestive of ACS who are discharged home after a normal cTnI drawn 6-9 h after symptom onset have a very low incidence of cardiac events at 30 days.

Vectorcardiography risk stratifies emergency department chest pain patients with left ventricular hypertrophy on the initial 12-lead ECG

BACKGROUND

Vectorcardiographic (VCG) measurements of ST-vector magnitude (VM) and QRS-vector difference (VD) have been demonstrated to be independent predictors of adverse outcome (AO) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in emergency department (ED) chest pain patients with absence of bundle branch block or left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) on the initial 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). The prognostic value of ST-VM and QRS-VD in ED chest pain patients with LVH on the initial 12-lead ECG has not been previously investigated.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was performed in 196 consecutive ED chest pain patients with suspected AMI and presence of voltage criteria for LVH on initial ECG who underwent continuous VCG monitoring during the initial evaluation. The optimal baseline ST-VM value and 2-hour QRS-VD value were defined as the most accurate value on the receiver operator characteristic curve (value with lowest false-negative and false-positive rate). Thirty-day AO was defined as AMI, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), or cardiac death occurring within 30 days of initial ED visit.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients (7.1%) were diagnosed as 24-hour AMI and 28 patients (14.3%) experienced 30-day AO. The optimal cut-off value for predicting 30-day AO was > 124 microV for ST-VM and > 21.7 microV for QRS-VD. Patients with either a positive ST-VM or a positive QRS-VD had 8.8 times increased odds of AMI (95% confidence interval, CI, 1.9-40.3; P = 0.003); 4.3 times increased odds of 30-day PTCA/CABG (95% CI 1.3-13.8; P = 0.019); and 3.8 times increased odds of 30-day AO (95% CI 1.6-9.3; P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline ST-VM and 2-hour QRS-VD risk stratifies ED chest pain patients with LVH voltage criteria on the initial 12-lead ECG.

Imaging in the evaluation of the patient with suspected acute coronary syndrome

Patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain have a common problem. Definitive diagnosis at presentation is difficult due to limitations of the initial evaluation, and, thus, the majority of patients are admitted. Recognition of these limitations has driven the investigation of alternative evaluation techniques and protocols to attempt to improve diagnostic sensitivity without increasing overall costs. Acute myocardial perfusion imaging has been a highly valuable technique for risk stratification of intermediate to low-risk patients with chest pain. However, for a variety of reasons, it has not been widely embraced. In the past few years, alternative techniques have been investigated for use in the diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes in the acute setting. Coronary calcium scoring and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging show promise as new tools in the armamentarium for acute coronary syndromes. The challenge now lays in developing a strategy that uses these and future techniques most appropriately to support optimal medical decision making.

Early use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in the ED treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: a local quality improvement initiative

A prospective observational study was conducted in 2,007 patients experiencing chest pain to determine impact of local quality improvement (QI) measures on the use of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors in the ED treatment of high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Patients with injury on the initial ECG or new sustained injury on continuous ECG were excluded. QI interventions were as follows: control (0-4 mo): no interventions (standardized protocols and prewritten orders in place 4 months prior); phase I (5-8 mo): simple education/awareness program with posted drug information pamphlets and eligibility criteria; phase II (9-12 mo): mandated QI form with real-time feedback and focused one-on-one physician education championed by an ED physician QI advocate. A total of 179 (8.9%) of the study patients met predefined high-risk criteria. Of these, a total of 41 (23.0%) patients had GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy initiated in the ED. Percent of high-risk patients receiving therapy increased from 6.0% during the control phase to 16.1% during phase I and 50.9% during phase II. After controlling for patient demographics, patients treated during phase I had a 2.8 times increased odds (95% confidence interval CI: 0.8-10.3; P =.11 [not significant]) of receiving GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor relative to the control phase, and patients treated during phase II had a 20.2 times increased odds (95% CI: 6.1-66.9; P <.0001) of treatment. In conclusion, local QI measures incorporating standardized protocols, preprinted orders, physician education, and interactive feedback championed by an ED QI physician advocate can increase early use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in the ED treatment of high-risk patients presenting with chest pain.

Value of definitive diagnostic testing in the evaluation of patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain

The optimal diagnostic evaluation of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain but without myocardial infarction or unstable angina is controversial. We performed a prospective, nonrandomized, observational study of 1,195 consecutive patients presenting to the ED with chest pain but who had normal or nondiagnostic electrocardiograms and negative cardiac biomarkers. Patients (mean +/- SD age 61 +/- 15 years; 55% women) were admitted to the hospital and a standard protocol for evaluation and treatment was suggested. The use of stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) or cardiac catheterization during their index hospitalization, and the 3-month incidence of coronary angiography, percutaneous cardiac intervention, coronary artery bypass surgery, re-presentation to our institution's ED for chest pain, myocardial infarction, or death were followed. Five hundred nine of 1,195 patients (43%) underwent provocative stress MPI during their index hospitalization; 37% had perfusion defects (predominantly ischemia). Fifty-six of 1,195 patients (4%) underwent cardiac catheterization without stress MPI for their primary diagnostic evaluation. Six hundred thirty of 1,195 patients (53%) had neither MPI or cardiac catheterization during their index hospitalization. During the 3-month follow-up period, patients with a normal stress perfusion study during their index hospitalization had fewer return visits (4%) compared with patients with abnormal perfusion studies (19%), those who underwent catheterization directly (16%), or patients with no initial diagnostic evaluation (15%) (p <0.001). In addition, patients who had a diagnostic evaluation during their index hospitalization had a lower incidence of either acute myocardial infarction (0.9% vs 2.1%) or death (0.4% vs 3.0%, p <0.001) in the 3-month follow-up period. Accordingly, we strongly advocate provocative stress MPI early after presentation for chest pain in all patients with risk factors for coronary artery disease.

The Erlanger chest pain evaluation protocol: a one-year experience with serial 12-lead ECG monitoring, two-hour delta serum marker measurements, and selective nuclear stress testing to identify and exclude acute coronary syndromes

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We determine the overall use of a 6-step accelerated chest pain protocol to identify and exclude acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and to confirm previous findings of the use of serial 12-lead ECG monitoring (SECG) in conjunction with 2-hour delta serum marker measurements to identify and exclude acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

METHODS

A prospective observational study was conducted over a 1-year period from January 1, 1999, through December 31, 1999, in 2,074 consecutive patients with chest pain who underwent our accelerated evaluation protocol, which includes 2-hour delta serum marker determinations in conjunction with automated SECG for the early identification and exclusion of AMI and selective nuclear stress testing for identification and exclusion of ACS. In patients not undergoing emergency reperfusion therapy, physician judgment was used to determine patient disposition at the completion of the 2-hour evaluation period: admit for ACS, discharge or admit for non-ACS condition, or immediate emergency department nuclear stress scan for possible ACS. A positive protocol was defined as a positive result in 1 or more of the 6 incremental steps in our chest pain evaluation protocol: (1) initial ECG diagnostic of acute injury or reciprocal injury; (2) baseline creatine kinase (CK)-MB level of 10 ng/mL or greater and index of 5% or greater or cardiac troponin I level of 2 ng/mL or greater; (3) new/evolving injury or new/evolving ischemia on SECG; (4) increase in CK-MB level of +1.5 ng/mL or greater or cardiac troponin I level of +0.2 ng/mL or greater in 2 hours; (5) clinical diagnosis of ACS despite a negative 2-hour evaluation; and (6) reversible perfusion defect on stress scan compared with on resting scan. All patients were followed up for 30-day ACS, which was defined as myocardial infarction (MI), percutaneous coronary intervention/coronary artery bypass grafting, coronary arteriography revealing stenosis of major coronary artery of 70% or greater not amenable to percutaneous coronary intervention/coronary artery bypass grafting, life-threatening complication, or cardiac death within 30 days of ED presentation.

RESULTS

Discharge diagnosis in the 2,074 study patients consisted of 179 (8.6%) patients with AMI, 26 (1.3%) patients with recent AMI (decreasing curve of CK-MB), and 327 (15.8%) patients with 30-day ACS. At 2 hours, sensitivity and specificity for MI (AMI or recent AMI) of SECG plus delta serum marker measurements was 93.2% and 93.9%, respectively (positive likelihood ratio 15.3; negative likelihood ratio 0.07). At the completion of the full ED evaluation protocol (positive result in >or=1 of the 6 incremental steps), sensitivity and specificity for 30-day ACS was 99.1% and 87.4%, respectively (positive likelihood ratio 7.9; negative likelihood ratio 0.01).

CONCLUSION

An accelerated chest pain evaluation strategy consisting of SECG, 2-hour delta serum marker measurements, and selective nuclear stress testing in conjunction with physician judgment identifies and excludes MI and 30-day ACS during the initial evaluation of patients with chest pain.