From expert data collectors to interventionists: changing the focus for infection control professionals

What we learned from the infection control and what we need in the future: A quantitative and qualitative study on hospital infection prevention and control practitioners (HIPCPs) in Tianjin, China

BACKGROUND

In December 2022, the epidemic prevention and control policy was upgraded, and China entered a different stage of epidemic control. This study aims to identify implications for better infection control and health care supply during the epidemic.

METHODS

A longitudinal quantitative and qualitative study was performed based on 2 comprehensive questionnaire surveys among 497 hospital infection prevention and control practitioners (HIPCPs) before and during the epidemic peak in Tianjin, China.

RESULTS

The workload (8.2 hours vs 10.14 hours, P = 0) and self-reported mental health problems (23.5% vs 61.8%, P < .05) among the HIPCPs increased significantly in the peak period. Ward reconstruction and resource coordination were the most needed jobs in hospital infection control, and rapidly increased medical waste during the epidemic needs to be considered in advance. Community support for health care personnel and their families, maintaining full PPE to reduce simultaneous infection of medical staff, and clinical training of infectious diseases for medical staff, especially doctors, in advance are the most important things we learned.

CONCLUSION

Although it has been 4 years since the first outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019, more improvements should be made to prepare for the next epidemic of potential diseases.

Strategies for Effective Infection Prevention Programs: Structures, Processes, and Funding

Successful Infection Prevention Programs (IPPs) consist of a multidisciplinary team led by a hospital epidemiologist and managed by infection preventionists. Knowledge of the economics of health care-associated infections (HAIs) and the ability to make a business plan is now essential to the success of programs. Prevention of HAIs is the core function of IPPs with impact on patient outcomes, quality of care, and cost savings for hospitals. This article discusses the structure and responsibilities of an IPP, the regulatory pressures and opportunities that these programs face, and how to build and manage a successful program.

Recruitment and hiring practices in United States infection prevention and control departments: Results of a national survey

BACKGROUND

Infection prevention is a profession that requires highly specified skills and clinical experience. Infection Preventionists (IPs) direct interventions that protect patients from health care-associated infections across clinical and community settings. To enhance the hiring and recruitment of diverse IPs, it is key to understand current recruitment and hiring practices METHODS: A national on-line survey was performed with members of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC) who participate in the recruitment and hiring of IPs in their organization. Descriptive statistics were calculated for respondent and organizational demographics, IP recruitment strategies and hiring practices.

RESULTS

In the fall of 2019, 522 APIC members from 101 of 113 APIC chapters (89% chapter response rate) participated in the survey. A vacant IP position was reported by 25% (n = 126) of respondents. Recent IP hires were primarily nurses (70%; n = 346) recruited from outside the organization (54%; n = 270). Online job-boards (eg, Indeed and Monster) and internal organizational job postings were the most frequently used recruitment strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

The results provide a summary of practices for IP recruitment and hiring that can inform local and national initiatives to increase the number and professional diversity of IPs.

A Decade of Preventing Harm

Medical errors are a significant source of morbidity and mortality, and while focused efforts to prevent harm have been made, sustaining reductions across multiple categories of patient harm remains a challenge. In 2008 BJC HealthCare initiated a systemwide program to eliminate all major causes of preventable harm and mortality over a five-year period with a goal of sustaining these reductions over the subsequent five years.

METHODS

Areas of focus included pressure ulcers, adverse drug events, falls with injury, health care-associated infections, and venous thromboembolism. Initial efforts involved building system-level multidisciplinary teams, utilizing standardized project management methods, and establishing standard surveillance methods. Evidence-based interventions were deployed across the system; core standards were established while allowing for flexibility in local implementation. Improvements were tracked using actual numbers of events rather than rates to increase meaning and interpretability by patients and frontline staff.

RESULTS

Over the course of the five-year intervention period, total harm events were reduced by 51.6% (10,371 events in 2009 to 5,018 events in 2012). Continued improvement efforts over the subsequent five years led to additional harm reduction (2,605 events in 2017; a 74.9% reduction since 2009).

CONCLUSION

A combination of project management discipline, rigorous surveillance, and focused interventions, along with system-level support of local hospital improvement efforts, led to dramatic reductions in preventable harm and long-term sustainment of progress.

Building a Successful Infection Prevention Program: Key Components, Processes, and Economics

Infection control is the discipline responsible for preventing health care-associated infections (HAIs) and has grown from an anonymous field, to a highly visible, multidisciplinary field of incredible importance. There has been increasing focus on prevention rather than control of HAIs. Infection prevention programs (IPPs) have enormous scope that spans multiple disciplines. Infection control and the prevention and elimination of HAIs can no longer be compartmentalized. This article discusses the structure and responsibilities of an IPP, the regulatory pressures and opportunities that these programs face, and how to build and manage a successful program.

Tensions inherent in the evolving role of the infection preventionist

BACKGROUND

The role of infection preventionists (IPs) is expanding in response to demands for quality and transparency in health care. Practice analyses and survey research have demonstrated that IPs spend a majority of their time on surveillance and are increasingly responsible for prevention activities and management; however, deeper qualitative aspects of the IP role have rarely been explored.

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative content analysis of in-depth interviews with 19 IPs at hospitals throughout the United States to describe the current IP role, specifically the ways that IPs effect improvements and the facilitators and barriers they face.

RESULTS

The narratives document that the IP role is evolving in response to recent changes in the health care landscape and reveal that this progression is associated with friction and uncertainty. Tensions inherent in the evolving role of the IP emerged from the interviews as 4 broad themes: (1) expanding responsibilities outstrip resources, (2) shifting role boundaries create uncertainty, (3) evolving mechanisms of influence involve trade-offs, and (4) the stress of constant change is compounded by chronic recurring challenges.

CONCLUSION

Advances in implementation science, data standardization, and training in leadership skills are needed to support IPs in their evolving role.

Relationship between systems-level factors and hand hygiene adherence

This study was a cross-sectional descriptive survey of acute care hospitals in California to describe staff hand hygiene compliance and related predictors and explore the relationship between hand hygiene adherence and health care-associated infections. Although there was a relatively small sample size, institutions with morning huddles reported a significantly higher proportion of 95% or more hand hygiene compliance. Huddles are an organizational tool to improve teamwork and communication and may offer promise to influence hand hygiene adherence.

Infection preventionists' job descriptions: do they reflect expanded roles and responsibilities?

In the last decade, the scope of practice of infection preventionists has expanded beyond the traditional roles of solo practitioner and expert data collectors to roles of interventionists and crucial leaders in successful patient safety initiatives. We examined the job descriptions of a small group of practicing infection preventionists to determine whether they reflected this expanded scope and responsibilities.

Improving outcomes and reducing costs by modular training in infection control in a resource-limited setting

OBJECTIVE

To study the impact of modular training and implementation of infection control practices on all health-care-associated infections (HAIs) in a cardiac surgery (CVTS) program of a tertiary care hospital.

DESIGN

Baseline data were compared with post-intervention (with modular training) data.

SETTING

This study was conducted in a cardiovascular surgical unit.

PARTICIPANTS

In total, 2838 patients were admitted in cardiovascular surgical service.

INTERVENTIONS

Two training modules and online continuous education were delivered to all health-care workers in CVTS unit.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

All four HAIs, such as surgical site infections (SSI), central line-associated blood stream infection (CLABSI), ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CA-UTI), were studied. Additional outcome measures included average length of stay cost of avoidance mortality and readmission rates.

RESULTS

The SSI rate had decreased in the post-intervention phase from 46 to 3.27% per 100 surgeries (P < 0.0001), CLABSI had decreased from 44 to 3.10% per 1000 catheter days (P < 0.009), VAP was reduced from 65 to 4.8% per 1000 ventilator days (P < 0.0001) and CA-UTI had reduced from 37 to 3.48% per 1000 urinary catheter days (P < 1.0). For every $1 spent on training, the return on investment was $236 as cost of avoidance of healthcare associated infections (HAIs).

CONCLUSIONS

Standardization of infection control training and practices is the most cost-effective way to reduce HCAIs and related adverse outcomes.

The network approach for prevention of healthcare-associated infections: long-term effect of participation in the Duke Infection Control Outreach Network

OBJECTIVE

To describe the rates of several key outcomes and healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) among hospitals that participated in the Duke Infection Control Outreach Network (DICON).

DESIGN AND SETTING

Prospective, observational cohort study of patients admitted to 24 community hospitals from 2003 through 2009.

METHODS

The following data were collected and analyzed: incidence of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), and HAIs caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA); employee exposures to bloodborne pathogens (EBBPs); physician EBBPs; patient-days; central line-days; ventilator-days; and urinary catheter-days. Poisson regression was used to determine whether incidence rates of these HAIs and exposures changed during the first 5 and 7 years of participation in DICON; nonrandom clustering of each outcome was controlled for. Cost saved and lives saved were calculated on the basis of published estimates.

RESULTS

In total, we analyzed 6.5 million patient-days, 4,783 EBPPs, 2,948 HAIs due to MRSA, and 2,076 device-related infections. Rates of employee EBBPs, HAIs due to MRSA, and device-related infections decreased significantly during the first 5 years of participation in DICON (P< .05 for all models; average decrease was approximately 50%); in contrast, physician EBBPs remained unchanged. In aggregate, 210 CLABSIs, 312 cases of VAP, 332 CAUTIs, 1,042 HAIs due to MRSA, and 1,016 employee EBBPs were prevented. Each hospital saved approximately $100,000 per year of participation, and collectively the hospitals may have prevented 52-105 deaths from CLABSI or VAP. The 7-year analysis demonstrated that these trends continued with further participation.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospitals with long-term participation in an infection control network decreased rates of significant HAIs by approximately 50%, decreased costs, and saved lives.

Building a successful infection prevention program: key components, processes, and economics

Infection control is the discipline responsible for preventing nosocomial infections. There has been an increasing focus on prevention rather than control of hospital-acquired infections. Individuals working in infection control have seen their titles change from infection control practitioner to infection control professional and most recently to infection preventionist (IP), emphasizing their critical role in protecting patients. The responsibilities of IPs span multiple disciplines including medicine, surgery, nursing, occupational health, microbiology, pharmacy, sterilization and disinfection, emergency medicine, and information technology. This article discusses the structure and responsibilities of an infection control program and the regulatory pressures and opportunities the program faces.

Expanding infection preventionists' influence in the 21st Century: looking back to move forward

The 5th Decennial International Conference on Healthcare-Associated Infections took place in Atlanta in March 2010. The conference was unprecedented in the variety, depth, and breath of scientific sessions and research abstracts informing the practice of health care epidemiology and infection prevention. However, noticeably absent were topics or related discussions focused on essential leadership skills and influence strategies required to implement the science into practice.

Electronic surveillance systems in infection prevention: organizational support, program characteristics, and user satisfaction

BACKGROUND

The use of electronic surveillance systems (ESSs) is gradually increasing in infection prevention and control programs. Little is known about the characteristics of hospitals that have a ESS, user satisfaction with ESSs, and organizational support for implementation of ESSs.

METHODS

A total of 350 acute care hospitals in California were invited to participate in a Web-based survey; 207 hospitals (59%) agreed to participate. The survey included a description of infection prevention and control department staff, where and how they spent their time, a measure of organizational support for infection prevention and control, and reported experience with ESSs.

RESULTS

Only 23% (44/192) of responding infection prevention and control departments had an ESS. No statistically significant difference was seen in how and where infection preventionists (IPs) who used an ESS and those who did not spend their time. The 2 significant predictors of whether an ESS was present were score on the Organizational Support Scale (odds ratio [OR], 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.18) and hospital bed size (OR, 1.004; 95% CI, 1.00-1.007). Organizational support also was positively correlated with IP satisfaction with the ESS, as measured on the Computer Usability Scale (P = .02).

CONCLUSION

Despite evidence that such systems may improve efficiency of data collection and potentially improve patient outcomes, ESSs remain relatively uncommon in infection prevention and control programs. Based on our findings, organizational support appears to be a major predictor of the presence, use, and satisfaction with ESSs in infection prevention and control programs.

Assessment of transparency of cost estimates in economic evaluations of patient safety programmes

OBJECTIVES

Transparency of costing is essential for decision-makers who require information on the efficiency of a health care programme, because effective decisions depend largely on applicability to their settings. The main objectives of this study were to assess published studies for transparency of cost estimates.

METHODS

We first developed criteria with two axes by reviewing publications dealing with economic evaluations and cost accounting studies: clarification of the scope of costing and accuracy of method evaluating costs. We then performed systematic searches of the literature for studies which estimated prevention costs and assessed the transparency and accuracy of costing based on our criteria.

RESULTS

Forty studies met the inclusion criteria. Half of the studies reported data for both the quantity and unit price of programmes in regard to prevention costs. Although 30 studies estimated costs of adverse events, 19 of these described the scope of costing only, and just five studies used a micro-costing method. Among 30 studies that estimated 'gross cost savings' and 'net cost savings', there was a huge discrepancy in labels.

CONCLUSIONS

Even if a cost study was conducted in accordance with existing techniques of economic evaluation which mostly paid attention to internal validity of cost estimates, without adequate explanation of the process of costing, reproducibility cannot be assured and the study may lose its value as scientific information. This study found that there is tremendous room for improvement.

Staffing and structure of infection prevention and control programs

BACKGROUND

The nature of infection prevention and control is changing; however, little is known about current staffing and structure of infection prevention and control programs.

METHODS

Our objectives were to provide a snapshot of the staffing and structure of hospital-based infection prevention and control programs in the United States. A Web-based survey was sent to 441 hospitals that participate in the National Healthcare Safety Network.

RESULTS

The response rate was 66% (n = 289); data were examined on 821 professionals. Infection preventionist (IP) staffing was significantly negatively related to bed size, with higher staffing in smaller hospitals (P < .001). Median staffing was 1 IP per 167 beds. Forty-seven percent of IPs were certified, and 24 percent had less than 2 years of experience. Most directors or hospital epidemiologists were reported to have authority to close beds for outbreaks always or most of the time (n = 225, 78%). Only 32% (n = 92) reported using an electronic surveillance system to track infections.

CONCLUSION

This study is the first to provide a comprehensive description of current infection prevention and control staffing, organization, and support in a select group of hospitals across the nation. Further research is needed to identify effective staffing levels for various hospital types as well as examine how the IP role is changing over time.

Hospital staffing and health care-associated infections: a systematic review of the literature

In the past 10 years, many researchers have examined relationships between hospital staffing and patients' risk of health care-associated infection (HAI). To gain understanding of this evidence base, a systematic review was conducted, and 42 articles were audited. The most common infection studied was bloodstream infection (n=18; 43%). The majority of researchers examined nurse staffing (n=38; 90%); of these, only 7 (18%) did not find a statistically significant association between nurse staffing variable(s) and HAI rates. Use of nonpermanent staff was associated with increased rates of HAI in 4 studies (P<.05). Three studies addressed infection control professional staffing with mixed results. Physician staffing was not found to be associated with patients' HAI risk (n=2). The methods employed and operational definitions used for both staffing and HAI varied; despite this variability, trends were apparent. Research characterizing effective staffing for infection control departments is needed.

Economics of infection control surveillance technology: cost-effective or just cost?

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have suggested that informatics tools, such as automated alert and decision support systems, may increase the efficiency and quality of infection control surveillance. However, little is known about the cost-effectiveness of these tools.

METHODS

We focus on 2 types of economic analyses that have utility in assessing infection control interventions (cost-effectiveness analysis and business-case analysis) and review the available literature on the economics of computerized infection control surveillance systems.

RESULTS

Previous studies on the effectiveness of computerized infection control surveillance have been limited to assessments of whether these tools increase the sensitivity and specificity of surveillance over traditional methods. Furthermore, we identified only 2 studies that assessed the costs associated with computerized infection control surveillance. Thus, it remains unknown whether computerized infection control surveillance systems are cost-effective and whether use of these systems improves patient outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The existing data are insufficient to allow for a summary conclusion on the cost-effectiveness of infection control surveillance technology. All future studies of computerized infection control surveillance systems should aim to collect outcomes and economic data to inform decision making and assist hospitals with completing business-cases analyses.

Raising standards while watching the bottom line: making a business case for infection control

While society would benefit from a reduced incidence of nosocomial infections, there is currently no direct reimbursement to hospitals for the purpose of infection control, which forces healthcare institutions to make economic decisions about funding infection control activities. Demonstrating value to administrators is an increasingly important function of the hospital epidemiologist because healthcare executives are faced with many demands and shrinking budgets. Aware of the difficulties that face local infection control programs, the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) Board of Directors appointed a task force to draft this evidence-based guideline to assist hospital epidemiologists in justifying and expanding their programs. In Part 1, we describe the basic steps needed to complete a business-case analysis for an individual institution. A case study based on a representative infection control intervention is provided. In Part 2, we review important basic economic concepts and describe approaches that can be used to assess the financial impact of infection prevention, surveillance, and control interventions, as well as the attributable costs of specific healthcare-associated infections. Both parts of the guideline aim to provide the hospital epidemiologist, infection control professional, administrator, and researcher with the tools necessary to complete a thorough business-case analysis and to undertake an outcome study of a nosocomial infection or an infection control intervention.

Infection control consultation in a 150-bed acute care hospital: making this unobserved and unmeasured critical job function visible

BACKGROUND

One qualified infection control director, reporting directly to administration, was responsible for the Infection Prevention and Control Program of a 150-bed acute care, non-teaching, for-profit hospital. To observe for potential trending, questions (consultations) and determinations related to infectious processes were documented.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the possibility of measuring the essential although "hidden" function of the infection control consultation (process), which is a role not formerly linked to infection rates (outcomes).

METHODS

A 7-year retrospective study was conducted of all infection control consultations requiring more than a 5-minute intervention, as part of routine job responsibilities. The XmR Statistical Process Control charts (XmR Charts) and Pearson's Correlation Coefficient were used to analyze the activity of infection control consultations.

RESULTS

From January 1, 1998 to December 31, 2004, there were 770 infection control consultations logged for 375.1 hours. Beginning with 2003, the variation in both the number and duration of infection control consultations in the XmR Charts become more standardized and has a smaller moving range between data points. The Pearson's Correlation Coefficient shows statistical significance (P <.05) between the number and duration of consultations.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of infection control consultations at this 150-bed hospital illustrates that this essential component can be measured, and should be formerly tracked to document overall assessment of infection prevention and control interdisciplinary interaction. The consultation process became more efficient over the 7-year study period because, as the number of questions increased, the duration required to achieve closure decreased.

Toward a socioethical approach to behavior change

Infection control professionals have traditionally relied on didacticism to promote behavior change among health care workers, but this approach yields disappointing results in a postmodern era of social fragmentation and intellectual ambiguity. We define a socioethical approach to behavior change and propose its implementation in 4 movements: from individualism to community, from rationality to rhetoric, from productivity to praxis, and from monologue to dialogue.

Performance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus protocols in Dutch hospitals

BACKGROUND

Although numerous studies have stressed the importance of compliance with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) protocols with regard to cost reduction and a safer environment for health care workers and patients, an evaluation of the usability of the protocols themselves is lacking. In this study, we evaluated the usability and performance of those protocols.

METHODS

The performance of MRSA protocols was examined in 5 Dutch hospitals by means of a questionnaire (n = 63), followed by a practical test (n = 50), in a stratified random sample of 3 types of health care workers (physicians, nursing staff, and cleaning personnel). The questionnaire consisted of constructs related to exposure to risk, risk perception, knowledge of and attitude toward the protocols and safety preventive measures, self-reported behavior, and social and organizational support. The practical test consisted of "what if" scenarios that simulate the actual use of the protocol as a guideline for solving infection problems. The health care workers were asked to verbalize their thoughts and actions while using the protocol.

RESULTS

The questionnaire demonstrated adequate knowledge of and attitude toward the MRSA protocols. However, the practical test revealed that the majority of respondents had problems with the accessibility, comprehensibility, applicability, and acceptability of the protocols. Problems not only occurred because of unclear information about the preventive measures and a poor infrastructure but also because of preventive measures that conflict with principles in providing care.

CONCLUSION

The protocols do not reflect the practical needs of the health care workers. In view of the different decisions that health care workers have to take in various circumstances, it would be impracticable to use the same MRSA protocol for all hospital staff. Finally, the practical test provided more reliable results than the questionnaire.

A review of strategies for enhancing the completeness of notifiable disease reporting

Notifiable disease surveillance systems provide essential data for infectious disease prevention and control programs at the local, state, and national levels. Given that reporting completeness is known to vary considerably, this review identifies methods that can reliably enhance completeness of reporting. These surveillance-related activities include initiating active surveillance when appropriate; implementing automated, electronic laboratory-based reporting; strengthening ties with clinicians and other key partners in notifiable disease reporting; and increasing the use of laboratory diagnostic tests in identifying new cases. Despite ample data in support of these strategies, notifiable disease surveillance continues to receive insufficient attention and resources. Recent attention to public health preparedness provides an opportunity to strengthen notifiable disease surveillance and enhance completeness of reporting.