On the conservative management of acute immune thrombocytopenia in children

Use of Single- or Two-dose Pulse Methylprednisolone in the Treatment of Acute Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura

Objectives

In immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) treatment, the main goal is achieving the platelet level most rapidly for hemostasis. Pulse steroid therapy is common due to the rapid increase in the platelet count within the first 48 hours. Intravenous (IV) pulse steroid therapy is usually administered as a single methylprednisolone dose in the morning. Oral methylprednisolone is generally used as two divided doses due to its half-life, but there is no efficacy study for the use of pulse methylprednisolone therapy in two doses. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether the administration of single or double doses of pulse steroid treatment, which is the cheapest and most economical way to treat patients, differ in terms of platelet count increase rate.

Methods

The diagnosis of acute ITP was made based on the appropriate clinical, laboratory, and bone marrow findings and platelet count <100.000/mm³. All the patients were diagnosed with bone marrow aspiration, and they were admitted to the hospital. All patients with platelet counts below 20000/mm³ and those who had wet purpura or active bleeding were treated. Patients in need of treatment were randomly divided into two treatment groups with closed envelope method. The first group was given IV pulse methylprednisolone (30 mg/kg/day for three days and 20 mg/kg/day for four days) in the early morning hours. The second group received the same daily dosages in two divided doses. Hemoglobin, white blood cell, and platelet counts were evaluated before and on the first, second, third, fifth, and seventh days of treatment. To evaluate the rate of treatment response, platelet counts over 20.000/mm³, 50.000/mm³, and 100.000/mm³ obtained on the first, second, third, and seventh days of treatment were compared.

Results

Sixty patients with acute ITP diagnosis receiving pulse steroid therapy were included in the study. Platelet counts of the patients in group 2, who received pulse steroids in two doses, reached ≥20.000/mm³ on the second day [median, (2-3) days], ≥50.000/mm³ on the third day [median, (2.7-3.5) days], ≥100.000/mm³ on the fifth day [median, (3-5) days], which were significantly lower than the platelet counts of the patients in the first group on the third day [median, (2-5) days], fifth day [median, (4-7) days], and seventh day [median, (4-7) days], respectively (p<0.001, p<0.001, p=0.004).

Conclusion

This study shows that administration of IV pulse steroid therapy in two doses is more effective in increasing the platelet count in early period in patients with acute ITP, especially whose platelet count is less than 20.000/mm³, and when we prefer to increase the platelet counts rapidly due to risk of intracranial hemorrhage.

Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in children with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP): study of 40 cases

Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a rare but devastating complication of childhood immune thrombocytopenia purpura (ITP). A survey of ICH from 1987 to 2000 identified cases of ICH in childhood ITP in the United States. Forty patients with ICH and 80 matched ITP control subjects were accrued. The estimated incidence of ICH was 0.19% to 0.78%. Platelet counts were less than 20 x 10(9)/L in 90% and less than 10 x 10(9)/L in 75% of children with ICH. Eighteen (45%) children developed ICH within 7 days of diagnosis of ITP; for 10 of these, ICH was the presenting feature of ITP. Twelve (30%) children had chronic ITP. Head trauma and hematuria were the most prominent features associated with ICH, identified in 33% and 22.5% of the patients with ICH and 1 and none of the controls (both P < .001). Bleeding beyond petechiae and ecchymoses was also linked to ICH. Mortality was 25%; a further 25% had neurologic sequelae. Strategies by which high-risk children could be identified were considered, and the costs of preventive combination treatment were estimated. Children with severe thrombocytopenia plus head trauma and/or hematuria appeared to be at particularly high risk of ICH. Aggressive treatment of these children may be appropriate.

Single dose of anti-D immune globulin at 75 microg/kg is as effective as intravenous immune globulin at rapidly raising the platelet count in newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenic purpura in children

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a randomized prospective trial of immune globulin treatment for 105 Rh+ children with newly-diagnosed immune thrombocytopenic purpura and a platelet count<20,000/microL, to determine whether anti-D immune globulin (anti-D) is as effective as intravenous immune globulin (IVIg).

STUDY DESIGN

Eligible patients received either a single intravenous dose of 50 microg/kg anti-D (anti-D50), 75 microg/kg anti-D, (anti-D75), or 0.8 g/kg IVIg, (IVIg). Patients were monitored for response to treatment and adverse events.

RESULTS

By 24 hours after treatment 50%, 72%, and 77% of patients in the anti-D50, anti-D75, and IVIg groups, respectively, had achieved a platelet count>20,000/microL (P=.03). By day 7, hemoglobin concentrations decreased by 1.6 g/dL, 2 g/dL, and 0.3 g/dL in the anti-D50, anti-D75, and IVIg groups, respectively. Headache, fever, or chills occurred least often in the anti-D50 group.

CONCLUSIONS

A single 75 microg/kg dose of Anti-D raised the platelet count in children with newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenic purpura more rapidly than standard-dose anti-D and as effectively as IVIg, with an acceptable safety profile.

Treatment of immune thrombocytopenic purpura in children : current concepts

Treatment of immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), the most common bleeding disorder of childhood, is a controversial subject for most practitioners. Diagnosis and management of ITP has historically been based primarily on expert opinion rather than on evidence. Due to a paucity of carefully conducted clinical trials in children, the management of ITP varies widely, ranging from observation only, to aggressive management with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), intravenous anti-D rhesus (Rh)0 immunoglobulin (IV RhIG), corticosteroids, and splenectomy. To address the controversies, the American Society of Hematology (ASH) and the British Society for Hematology (BSH) have developed ITP practice guidelines. These guidelines, based on expert opinion, differ in their recommendations for treatment. The ASH guidelines favor therapy based on a low platelet count, and the more current BSH guidelines recommend a more conservative 'wait and watch' approach. In addition to treating children with severe bleeding symptoms, there is a tendency (not evidence based) to treat early in order to prevent a life-threatening bleeding episode, including intracerebral hemorrhage. Corticosteroids are a highly effective therapy, inexpensive, and can usually increase the platelet count within hours to days. However, chronic or prolonged use is associated with toxicity. In the US, based on the knowledge of known toxicities of corticosteroids, as well as the efficacy of alternative treatments (IV RhIG, IVIG), many pediatricians prefer to treat with IVIG and IV RhIG, reserving corticosteroid treatment for serious bleeding or refractory disease. However, in the UK, for the most part, corticosteroids are used as first-line therapy in children with ITP. Splenectomy is rarely indicated in children except for those with life-threatening bleeding and chronic, severe ITP with impairment of quality of life. For children who develop chronic or refractory ITP, immunosuppressive drugs and/or chemotherapy agents may offer some promise. However, the long-term effects of these drugs in children are unknown and they should not be considered unless there is unequivocal evidence that the patient is refractory to IV RhIG, IVIG, and corticosteroids. To date, virtually all of the randomized clinical trials conducted in children with ITP have focused on platelet counts as the sole outcome measure. Only carefully designed, multicenter, randomized clinical trials comparing the effects of different treatment modalities in terms of bleeding, quality of life, adverse effects, and treatment-related costs will be able to address the controversies surrounding childhood ITP treatment and allow management of this condition to be based on scientific data rather than treatment philosophy.

Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura of Childhood

Immune mediated thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a common manifestation of autoimmune disease in children. Although patients often present with bruises, petechiae, and some mucosal bleeding, the incidence of life-threatening hemorrhage is rare (0.2–0.9%) but can be fatal when presenting in vital organs. A wide range of therapeutic regimens are currently in use, including observation alone, as the majority of children recover within 4–6 months regardless of treatment. A growing understanding of the pathophysiology of acute ITP in children has not impacted the controversy surrounding treatment, but has clarified the mechanism of action of the most frequently used agents in chronic ITP. Newer monoclonal antibodies such as Rituxan have proved very useful in chronic or refractory ITP and studies are ongoing to determine the best regimens using this form of immune modulation. Splenectomy and newer agents to boost platelet production are also under study in chronic ITP. Neonates may also have a form of immune thrombocytopenia with extensive bruising and thrombocytopenia called neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenic purpura (NATP). Rather than autoantibodies, the platelet destruction is secondary to transplacental maternal IgG alloantibodies. During pregnancy mothers may become sensitized to platelet membrane antigens present on fetal platelets. These antibodies may result in serious bleeding, including intracranial hemorrhage in the perinatal period. Once identified, these mothers may require treatment during future pregnancies to minimize serious bleeding in the fetus and neonate. Treatment in utero and immediately following delivery is focused on restoring neonatal platelets to a safe level and preventing life-threatening bleeding.

The pros and cons of drug therapy for immune thrombocytopenic purpura in children

This article discusses the pros and cons of drug therapy for immune thrombocytopenic purpura in children.

Immune thrombocytopenic purpura

Although many advances have been achieved in the understanding of ITP, critical issues regarding the pathophysiology and biology of the disease remain to be elucidated. The recent characterization of the human genome along with new sophisticated molecular biology techniques will allow basic researchers to study genes that may affect the presentation and clinical course of the disease. Different patterns of gene expression in this population can be studied, leading to the identification of subsets of patients with ITP at higher risk of bleeding. The multigene patterns of expression might also provide clues about regulatory mechanisms and broader cellular functions. In order to answer essential clinical questions, like the incidence of ICH in relation to drug treatment or observation alone, clinical trials should be appropriately designed. More studies are necessary to better define the optimal treatment approach for each child with ITP. Even though the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage cannot be used as the primary outcome measure because of its rarity, numerous other outcomes, such as rate of rise in platelet count, cost and side effects of therapy, health related quality of life of the patient and family, and severity of hemorrhage can be measured and compared between treatment groups. Future investigators should find it attractive to conduct trials in children with this common hematological disease so that decision making can be based more on scientific evidence than on anecdote and opinion.