The use of short-acting nifedipine in children with hypertension: another example of the need for comprehensive drug testing in children

The management of hypertensive emergencies in children after stem cell transplantation

AIM OF THE REVIEW

This work presents a short overview on the available data about drugs that are currently used to treat hypertensive emergencies in children with a focus on incidents after stem cell transplantation. It shows that the pediatric use of all hypotensive agents appears to be mainly based on personal experience of the attending physicians rather than on convincing clinical trials.

METHOD

A literature search was performed in MEDLINE, through PubMed, using the medical subject headings (MeSH) hypertensive emergencies, nifedipine, nicardipine, and children. Further articles were identified by checking cross-references of articles and books.

RESULTS

Hypertensive emergencies in children after stem cell transplantation usually have a renal etiology, because of the treatment with the calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporine and tacrolimus. In these severe cases an immediate action is necessary to avoid possible appearance or exacerbation of endorgan damage. Because of their mechanism of action and a potential nephroprotective effect calcium channel blockers may be particularly suitable in cases of hypertensive emergencies. An intravenous application of nifedipine may compensate the difficulties of accurate dosing, but keeping in mind possible severe side effects and the lack of published experience its use in children is at least questionable. Nicardipine appears to be the hypotensive agent of first choice. In adults, the treatment of hypertensive emergencies with intravenous nicardipine is well-documented, but for an evaluation of safety in pediatric use, the published studies and case reports appear to be barely adequate.

CONCLUSION

The actual treatment approaches vary widely, demonstrating the lack of hard science on which current treatment of hypertensive emergencies in children is based. The hypotensive agent for the individual situation should be chosen considering the properties, side effects, the limited experiences with its use and the patient's anamnesis.

Gastro-oesophageal reflux treatment for prolonged non-specific cough in children and adults

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is said to be the causative factor in up to 41% of adults with chronic cough. Treatment for GORD includes conservative measures (diet manipulation), pharmaceutical therapy (motility or prokinetic agents, H(2)-antagonist and proton pump inhibitors (PPI)) and fundoplication.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of GORD treatment on chronic cough in children and adults with GORD and prolonged cough that is not related to an underlying respiratory disease, i.e. non-specific chronic cough.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, review articles and reference lists of relevant articles. The date of last search was 8 April 2010.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on GORD treatment for cough in children and adults without primary lung disease.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted study authors for further information.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 19 studies (six paediatric, 13 adults). None of the paediatric studies could be combined for meta-analysis. A single RCT in infants found that PPI (compared to placebo) was not efficacious for cough outcomes (favouring placebo OR 1.61; 95% CI 0.57 to 4.55) but those on PPI had significantly increased adverse events (OR 5.56; 95% CI 1.18 to 26.25) (number needed to treat for harm in four weeks was 11 (95% CI 3 to 232)). In adults, analysis of H(2) antagonist, motility agents and conservative treatment for GORD was not possible (lack of data) and there were no controlled studies of fundoplication. We analysed nine adult studies comparing PPI (two to three months) to placebo for various outcomes in the meta-analysis. Using intention-to-treat, pooled data from studies resulted in no significant difference between treatment and placebo in total resolution of cough (OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.19 to 1.15). Pooled data revealed no overall significant improvement in cough outcomes (end of trial or change in cough scores). We only found significant differences in sensitivity analyses. We found a significant improvement in change of cough scores at end of intervention (two to three months) in those receiving PPI (standardised mean difference -0.41; 95% CI -0.75 to -0.07) using generic inverse variance analysis on cross-over trials. Two studies reported improvement in cough after five days to two weeks of treatment.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

PPI is not efficacious for cough associated with GORD symptoms in very young children (including infants) and should not be used for cough outcomes. There is insufficient data in older children to draw any valid conclusions. In adults, there is insufficient evidence to conclude definitely that GORD treatment with PPI is universally beneficial for cough associated with GORD. Clinicians should be cognisant of the period (natural resolution with time) and placebo effect in studies that utilise cough as an outcome measure. Future paediatric and adult studies should be double-blind, randomised controlled and parallel-design, using treatments for at least two months, with validated subjective and objective cough outcomes and include ascertainment of time to respond as well as assessment of acid and/or non-acid reflux.

Pediatric cough: children are not miniature adults

Pediatric cough-related issues, like most other conditions in particularly young children, share similarities but also have substantial important differences with adults. These can be understood from physiologically based domains simplified to (1) cough-specific, (2) general respiratory, (3) other direct systems such as the immune system, and (4) other general physiology. Among other reasons, these result in observed differences in etiology, management, and measurement of response between children and adults. For example, while empirical therapy for chronic cough is widely advocated for adults, it is not advocated for children. Indeed, there is some evidence that an empirical approach is potentially harmful; this is related to the use of medications and the delay in obtaining a correct diagnosis such as missed foreign body aspiration.

Are One or Two Dangerous? Calcium Channel Blocker Exposure in Toddlers

Unintentional pediatric ingestions of calcium channel blockers are increasing in frequency due to increased use of this antihypertensive class. Potential toxic effects include severe refractory hypotension and death; however, the true toxicity of unintentional pediatric ingestions of 1-2 pills is poorly defined. A literature review was conducted to more closely determine toxic and lethal dosages of calcium channel blockers in the pediatric population under 6 years of age. Results indicate that, although most accidental pediatric ingestions are asymptomatic, a small number do result in cardiovascular instability or even death. The dihydropyridines, particularly nifedipine, and the phenylalkylamine verapamil are most often implicated in symptomatic ingestions. There are no adequate data to identify which children are predisposed to illness, or to determine cutoffs for toxic dosages. However, ingestions of only one pill have been documented to cause severe symptoms, including death. Thus, emergency evaluation to assess potential toxicity is necessary, and gastrointestinal decontamination and in-hospital observation of at least 6 h after toxic ingestion for regular release medications, and 12-24 h after toxic ingestion for sustained release medications is recommended for all cases of unintentional calcium channel blocker ingestion in children younger than 6 years of age.

A review of calcium channel antagonists in the treatment of pediatric hypertension

All children aged > or = 3 years should have an annual blood pressure (BP) measurement taken during a routine physical examination. Physicians should become familiar with recommended pediatric normative BP tables. BP above the 95th percentile may require drug therapy. There are several categories of antihypertensives available to the clinician. Calcium channel antagonists (CCAs) are a class of drugs that exert their antihypertensive effect by inhibiting the influx of calcium ions across the cell membranes. This results in dilatation of peripheral arterioles. When given orally, CCAs are metabolised in the liver by cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme CYP3A4; hence, some CCAs will affect the half-life of drugs that share this enzyme system for their metabolism. CCAs can be safely used in children with renal insufficiency or failure and as a general rule there is no need to modify drug dosage in this population. CCAs are generally well tolerated; most adverse effects appear to be dose related. Headache, flushing, gastrointestinal upset, and edema of the lower extremities are the most common symptoms reported with the use of CCAs. Pediatric data regarding safety and efficacy of CCAs have mostly been obtained from retrospective analyses. Extended-release nifedipine and amlodipine are the two most commonly used oral CCAs in the management of pediatric hypertension. These drugs can be given once a day, although many children require twice-daily administration. Extended-release nifedipine has to be swallowed whole; hence, its use in younger children who cannot swallow pills is limited. Amlodipine can be made into a solution without compromising its long duration of action; therefore, it is the CCA of choice for very young children. Oral short-acting nifedipine and intravenous nicardipine are safe and effective CCAs for the management of hypertensive crisis in children. Short-acting nifedipine can cause unpredictable changes in BP; hence, it should be used cautiously and in low doses. Intravenous nicardipine has a rapid onset of action and a short half-life. Intravenous infusion of nicardipine can be titrated for effective control of BP. Intravenous nicardipine has been used safely in hospitalized children and newborns for the management of hypertensive crisis, and for controlled hypotension during surgery. CCAs are a class of antihypertensives that are safe and effective in pediatric patients. They have relatively few adverse effects and are well tolerated by children. This article reviews CCAs as antihypertensives in the management of pediatric hypertension.

Gastro-oesophageal reflux treatment for prolonged non-specific cough in children and adults

BACKGROUND

Cough is a very common symptom presenting to medical practitioners. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is said to be the causative factor in up to 41% of adults with chronic cough. However cough and GORD are common ailments and their co-existence by chance is high. Also cough can induce reflux episodes. Treatment for GORD includes conservative measures (diet manipulation), pharmaceutical therapy (motility or prokinetic agents, H(2) antagonist and proton pump inhibitors (PPI)) and fundoplication.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of GORD treatment on chronic cough in children and adults with GORD and prolonged cough that is not related to an underlying respiratory disease i.e. non-specific chronic cough.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register Collaboration and Cochrane Airways Group, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, review articles and reference lists of relevant articles were searched. The date of last search was 7th April 2006.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials on GORD treatment for cough in children and adults without primary lung disease.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Results of searches were reviewed against pre-determined criteria for inclusion. Two independent reviewers selected, extracted and assessed data for inclusion. Authors were contacted for further information. Data was analysed as "intention to treat" as well as "treatment received". Paediatric and adults data were considered separately. Sensitivity analyses were performed.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirteen studies (3 paediatric, 10 adults) were included. Data from six were available for analysis. None of the paediatric studies could be included in meta-analysis. In adults, analysis on use of H(2) antagonist, motility agents and conservative treatment for GORD were not possible (from lack of data) and there were no controlled studies on fundoplication as an intervention. Six adult studies comparing PPI (2-3 months) to placebo were analysed for various outcomes in the meta-analysis. Enrolment of subjects for two studies were primarily from medical clinics and another 4 studies were otolaryngology clinic patients or patients with laryngitis. Using "intention to treat", pooled data from 4 studies resulted in no significant difference between treatment and placebo in total resolution of cough, Odds Ratio 0.46 (95% CI 0.19 to 1.15). Pooled data revealed no overall significant improvement in cough outcomes (end of trial or change in cough scores). Significant differences were only found in sensitivity analyses. A significant improvement in change of cough scores was found in end of intervention (2-3 months) in those receiving PPI with a standardised mean difference of -0.41 (95%CI -0.75, -0.07) using GIV analysis on cross over trials. Two studies reported improvement in cough after 5 days to 2 weeks of treatment.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to definitely conclude that GORD treatment with PPI is universally beneficial for cough associated with GORD in adults. The beneficial effect was only seen in sub-analysis and its effect was small. The optimal duration of such a trial of therapy to evaluate response could not be ascertained in the meta-analysis although two RCTs reported significant change by 2 weeks of therapy. Clinicians should be cognisant of a period (natural resolution with time) and placebo effect in studies that utilise cough as an outcome measure. Data in children are inconclusive. Future paediatric and adult studies are needed whereby studies should be double blind, randomised controlled, parallel design, using treatments for at least two months, with validated subjective and objective cough outcomes and include ascertainment of time to respond as well as assessment of acid and/or non acid reflux whilst on therapy.

Cough throughout life: children, adults and the senile

We review cough from premature birth, mature neonatal life, in childhood and adult life, and in old age. There is a regrettable lack of definitive studies, but many clues in the literature. The cough reflex seems weak in premature infants, but develops with maturity. It is pronounced in childhood, but there seem to be no studies comparing its strength then with that in adulthood. In old age the cough may weaken, as indicated by the prevalence of aspiration pneumonia. These changes are presumably related to the development and degeneration of the afferent and central nervous pathways for cough, which may be reflected in the changes in laryngeal muscle function with age. There is much evidence that age influences the development of the respiratory system in general, and of the immune system which would affect the degree, frequency and clinical issues of cough. Other factors that limit our understanding of the changes in cough with age include the reporting of cough by parents in infants and carers in old age and the use of different diagnostic criteria throughout life. Age-related variation in cough sensitivity seems to be well established, but its quantitation and mechanisms require much further research.

Guidelines for evaluating chronic cough in pediatrics: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines

OBJECTIVES

To review relevant literature and present evidence-based guidelines to assist general and specialist medical practitioners in the evaluation and management of children who present with chronic cough.

METHODOLOGY

The Cochrane, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases, review articles, and reference lists of relevant articles were searched and reviewed by a single author. The date of the last comprehensive search was December 5, 2003, and that of the Cochrane database was November 7, 2004. The authors' own databases and expertise identified additional articles.

RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric chronic cough (ie, cough in children aged <15 years) is defined as a daily cough lasting for >4 weeks. This time frame was chosen based on the natural history of URTIs in children and differs from the definition of chronic cough in adults. In this guideline, only chronic cough will be discussed. Chronic cough is subdivided into specific cough (ie, cough associated with other symptoms and signs suggestive of an associated or underlying problem) and nonspecific cough (ie, dry cough in the absence of an identifiable respiratory disease of known etiology). The majority of this section focuses on nonspecific cough, as specific cough encompasses the entire spectrum of pediatric pulmonology. A review of the literature revealed few randomized controlled trials for treatment of nonspecific cough. Management guidelines are summarized in two pathways. Recommendations are derived from a systematic review of the literature and were integrated with expert opinion. They are a general guideline only, do not substitute for sound clinical judgment, and are not intended to be used as a protocol for the management of all children with a coughing illness. Children (aged <15 years) with cough should be managed according to child-specific guidelines, which differ from those for adults as the etiologic factors and treatments for children are sometimes different from those for adults. Cough in children should be treated based on etiology, and there is no evidence for using medications for the symptomatic relief of cough. If medications are used, it is imperative that the children are followed up and therapy with the medications stopped if there is no effect on the cough within an expected time frame. An evaluation of the time to response is important. Irrespective of diagnosis, environmental influences and parental expectations should be discussed and managed accordingly. Cough often impacts the quality of life of both children and parents, and the exploration of parental expectations and fears is often valuable in the management of cough in children.

Cough: are children really different to adults?

Worldwide paediatricians advocate that children should be managed differently from adults. In this article, similarities and differences between children and adults related to cough are presented. Physiologically, the cough pathway is closely linked to the control of breathing (the central respiratory pattern generator). As respiratory control and associated reflexes undergo a maturation process, it is expected that the cough would likewise undergo developmental stages as well. Clinically, the 'big three' causes of chronic cough in adults (asthma, post-nasal drip and gastroesophageal reflux) are far less common causes of chronic cough in children. This has been repeatedly shown by different groups in both clinical and epidemiological studies. Therapeutically, some medications used empirically for cough in adults have little role in paediatrics. For example, anti-histamines (in particular H1 antagonists) recommended as a front-line empirical treatment of chronic cough in adults have no effect in paediatric cough. Instead it is associated with adverse reactions and toxicity. Similarly, codeine and its derivatives used widely for cough in adults are not efficacious in children and are contraindicated in young children. Corticosteroids, the other front-line empirical therapy recommended for adults, are also minimally (if at all) efficacious for treating non-specific cough in children. In summary, current data support that management guidelines for paediatric cough should be different to those in adults as the aetiological factors and treatment in children significantly differ to those in adults.

The assessment and management of hypertensive emergencies and urgencies in children

Although the prevalence of hypertension in the pediatric population is estimated at only 1% to 2%, hypertensive urgencies and emergencies may be encountered in the emergency department. Efficient management of these children is of utmost importance to avoid some of the life-threatening complications associated with hypertension and its treatment. This article serves to review some of the important aspects of pediatric hypertensive emergencies, including diagnosis, emergency department investigations, and pharmacologic management.

Gastro-oesophageal reflux treatment for prolonged non-specific cough in children and adults

BACKGROUND

Cough is a very common symptom presenting to medical practitioners. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is said to be the causative factor in up to 41% of adults with chronic cough. However cough and GORD are common ailments and their co-existence by chance is high. Also cough can induce reflux episodes. Treatment for GORD includes conservative measures (diet manipulation), pharmaceutical therapy (motility or prokinetic agents, H(2) antagonist and proton pump inhibitors (PPI)) and fundoplication.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of GORD treatment on chronic cough in children and adults with GORD and prolonged cough that is not related to an underlying respiratory disease i.e. non-specific chronic cough.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register Collaboration and Cochrane Airways Group, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, review articles and reference lists of relevant articles were searched. The date of last search was 4th April 2004.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials on GORD treatment for cough in children and adults without primary lung disease.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Results of searches were reviewed against pre-determined criteria for inclusion. Two independent reviewers selected, extracted and assessed data for inclusion. Authors were contacted for further information. Data was analysed as "intention to treat" as well as "treatment received". Paediatric and adults data were considered separately. Sensitivity analyses were performed.

MAIN RESULTS

11 studies (3 paediatric, 8 adults; 383 participants) were included. None of the paediatric studies could be included in meta-analysis. In adults, analysis on use of H(2) antagonist, motility agents and conservative treatment for GORD were not possible (from lack of data) and there were no controlled studies on fundoplication as an intervention. Five adult studies comparing PPI (2-3 months) to placebo were analysed for various outcomes in the meta-analysis. Enrollment of subjects for two studies were primarily from medical clinics and another three studies were otolaryngeal clinic patients. Using "intention to treat", pooled data from three studies resulted in no significant difference between treatment and placebo in total resolution of cough. Pooled data revealed no significant improvement in cough outcomes (end of trial or change in cough scores). Significant differences were only found in sensitivity analysis. A significant improvement in change of cough scores was found in end of intervention (2-3 months) in those receiving PPI with a standardised mean difference of -0.41 (95%CI -0.75, -0.07) using GIV analysis on cross over trials. Two studies reported improvement in cough after 5 days to 2 weeks of treatment. Significant heterogeneity was found between studies using omeprazole and other PPIs.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to definitely conclude that GORD treatment with PPI is beneficial for cough associated with GORD in adults. The beneficial effect was only seen in sub-analysis and its effect was small. The optimal duration of such a trial of therapy to evaluate response could not be ascertained in the meta-analysis although two RCTs reported significant change by two weeks of therapy. Clinicians should be cognisant of a period (natural resolution with time) and placebo effect in studies that utilise cough as an outcome measure. Data in children are inconclusive. Future paediatric and adult studies are needed whereby studies should be double blind, randomised controlled, parallel design, using treatments for at least two months, with validated subjective and objective cough outcomes and include ascertainment of time to respond as well as assessment of acid and/or non acid reflux whilst on therapy.

Safety of short-acting nifedipine in children with severe hypertension

Short-acting nifedipine has been abandoned as a treatment for severe hypertension in adults as a result of significant adverse effects. Despite this, it remains a popular choice for the treatment of severe hypertension in children. However, recent publications describing adverse effects of short-acting nifedipine in children similar to those reported in adults, have prompted some experts to question the continued use of this agent in children. In this review, available data on the pharmacology, clinical efficacy and safety of short-acting nifedipine are reviewed, and the advisability of using short-acting nifedipine is reassessed. Although low (< 0.25 mg/kg) doses of short-acting nifedipine may be safe in some hypertensive children, alternative agents that produce more controlled reductions in blood pressure, and that are easier to accurately dose and administer, should probably be chosen for the majority of children with severe hypertension.

Pediatric hypertension 2001

During the past decade, there has been a surge of interest in childhood and adolescent hypertension. The current review summarizes work published during the past year in the following areas: prenatal and early postnatal causes of hypertension; new information on the genetics of childhood hypertension; the relation of obesity, insulin resistance, and diabetes to hypertension; the use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to evaluate childhood hypertension; and advances in drug therapy for children with hypertension. The information obtained during the past year has improved our understanding of the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of childhood hypertension.

Pediatric hypertension: recent literature

This article reviews selected recent literature specifically concerning pediatric hypertension, much of which has focused on measurement and monitoring of blood pressure, as well as on evaluating antihypertensive medications. Normative data for blood pressure in children have been widely available for some time, based upon seated in-office measurements. In recent years, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), facilitated by user-friendly instrumentation, has become more commonplace, though norms are not based on large populations. However, ABPM has important uses in assessing blood pressure as well as in monitoring antihypertensive. This review discusses issues involved in determining blood pressure, as well as the utility of ABPM in several situations. Recent developments concerning pediatric antihypertensive therapy are considered, as well as new information relevant to the diagnosis, course and treatment of hypertension in children and adolescents.