Safety and efficacy of limited-dose tissue plasminogen activator in acute vascular occlusion

Assessment of histological characteristics, imaging markers, and rt-PA susceptibility of ex vivo venous thrombi

Venous thromboembolism is a significant source of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Catheter-directed thrombolytics is the primary treatment used to relieve critical obstructions, though its efficacy varies based on the thrombus composition. Non-responsive portions of the specimen often remain in situ, which prohibits mechanistic investigation of lytic resistance or the development of diagnostic indicators for treatment outcomes. In this study, thrombus samples extracted from venous thromboembolism patients were analyzed ex vivo to determine their histological properties, susceptibility to lytic therapy, and imaging characteristics. A wide range of thrombus morphologies were observed, with a dependence on age and etymology of the specimen. Fibrinolytic inhibitors including PAI-1, alpha 2-antiplasmin, and TAFI were present in samples, which may contribute to the response venous thrombi to catheter-directed thrombolytics. Finally, a weak but significant correlation was observed between the response of the sample to lytic drug and its magnetic microstructure assessed with a quantitative MRI sequence. These findings highlight the myriad of changes in venous thrombi that may promote lytic resistance, and imaging metrics that correlate with treatment outcomes.

Dual drive mode polydopamine nanomotors for continuous treatment of an inferior vena cava thrombus

It is of great significance to find effective thrombolytic treatments due to the harm caused by thrombosis to human health. Based on the formation mechanism and complex microenvironment of a thrombus, polydopamine nanomotors (PDANMs) modified by the peptide of Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) and loaded with urokinase (UK) were designed and prepared. A polydopamine (PDA) substrate has a good photothermal conversion effect. Under near-infrared (NIR) light irradiation, it can not only perform photothermal therapy (PTT) on thrombus, but also provide the driving force of PDANMs. Thrombolytic drug UK was loaded in the mesoporous structure of the PDA substrate and can be released at the thrombus site for drug therapy. The modified RGD can target the thrombus site, moreover, benefiting from the guanidine group of L-arginine in the peptide chain, and RGD can interact with reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the thrombus microenvironment to produce nitric oxide (NO). NO not only propelled the movement of nanomotors, but also promoted the growth of vascular endothelial cells to repair damaged blood vessels. The experimental results show that NIR and NO can provide dual driving sources for the nanosystem to achieve continuous and deep penetration of the drug-loaded nanomotors at the thrombus site, while realizing the photothermal and drug synergistic therapy to enhance the therapeutic effect and promote the growth of vascular endothelium cells. This kind of thrombus treatment strategy based on nanomotor drug delivery systems will provide good technical support for the clinical treatment of inferior vena cava thrombus.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of endovascular and surgical revascularization techniques in acute limb ischemia

BACKGROUND

The initial treatment of patients with acute limb ischemia (ALI) remains undefined. The aim of this article was to compare the safety and effectiveness of catheter-driven thrombolysis (CDT) with surgical revascularization and evaluate the various fibrinolytic agents, endovascular, and pharmacochemical approaches that aim for thrombectomy.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies on the management of ALI by means of surgical or endovascular recanalization, returning 520 studies. All randomized, controlled trials, nonrandomized prospective, and retrospective studies were included comparing treatment of ALI.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies, investigating a total of 4689 patients, were included for meta-analysis spread across nine different comparisons. No differences were found in limb salvage between thrombectomy and thrombolysis. More major vascular events were seen in the thrombolysis group (6.5% compared with 4.4% in the surgically treated group; odds ratio [OR], 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13-0.87; P = .02; I² = 20%). Comparable limb salvage was found for high- and low-dose recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (r-tPA). No significant differences were found in major vascular event between low r-tPA (14%) and high r-tPA (10.5%; P = .13). The 30-day limb salvage rate was 79.7% for r-tPA treatment and 60.4% for streptokinase (OR, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.26-7.85; P = .01; I² = 0%). AngioJet showed more limb salvage at 6 months compared with r-tPa (OR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.17-4.18; P = .01; I² = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Both CDT and surgery have comparable limb salvage rates in patients with ALI; however, CDT is associated with a higher risk of hemorrhagic complications. No conclusions can be drawn regarding the risk of hemorrhagic complications regarding thrombolytic therapy by means of r-tPA, streptokinase, or urokinase. Insufficient data are available to conclude the preference of using a hybrid approach, ultrasound-accelerated CDT, heated r-tPA. or novel endovascular (rheolytical) thrombectomy systems. Future trials regarding ALI need to be constructed carefully, ensuring comparable study groups, and should follow standardized practices of outcome reporting.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis: Korean Practice Guidelines

Lower extremity deep vein thrombosis is a serious medical condition that can result in death or major disability due to pulmonary embolism or post-thrombotic syndrome. Appropriate diagnosis and treatment are required to improve symptoms and salvage the affected limb. Early thrombus clearance rapidly resolves symptoms related to venous obstruction, restores valve function and reduces the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome. Recently, endovascular treatment has been established as a standard method for early thrombus removal. However, there are a variety of views regarding the indications and procedures among medical institutions and operators. Therefore, we intend to provide evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis by multidisciplinary consensus. These guidelines are the result of a close collaboration between interventional radiologists and vascular surgeons. The goals of these guidelines are to improve treatment, to serve as a guide to the clinician, and consequently to contribute to public health care.

Endovascular Interventions for Acute and Chronic Lower Extremity Deep Venous Disease: State of the Art

The societal and individual burden caused by acute and chronic lower extremity venous disease is considerable. In the past several decades, minimally invasive endovascular interventions have been developed to reduce thrombus burden in the setting of acute deep venous thrombosis to prevent both short- and long-term morbidity and to recanalize chronically occluded or stenosed postthrombotic or nonthrombotic veins in symptomatic patients. This state-of-the-art review provides an overview of the techniques and challenges, rationale, patient selection criteria, complications, postinterventional care, and outcomes data for endovascular intervention in the setting of acute and chronic lower extremity deep venous disease. Online supplemental material is available for this article.

The role of thrombolysis in the clinical management of deep vein thrombosis

The cornerstones of current management of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) are the routine use of anticoagulant therapy, graduated elastic compression stockings, and early ambulation. Thrombolytic therapy was previously reserved only for patients with life-, limb-, or organ-threatening complications. However, the postthrombotic syndrome has been increasingly recognized as a frequent and serious long-term complication of DVT. In parallel, endovascular thrombolytic methods have evolved considerably in recent years, prompting discussion and controversy as to whether they should be more liberally used. In some centers, pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis is now routinely used in the treatment of acute iliofemoral DVT. Randomized trials are currently under way to determine when the use of pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis is appropriate in patients presenting with acute proximal DVT.

Management of massive and submassive pulmonary embolism, iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis, and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is responsible for the hospitalization of >250 000 Americans annually and represents a significant risk for morbidity and mortality. Despite the publication of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines to aid in the management of VTE in its acute and chronic forms, the clinician is frequently confronted with manifestations of VTE for which data are sparse and optimal management is unclear. In particular, the optimal use of advanced therapies for acute VTE, including thrombolysis and catheter-based therapies, remains uncertain. This report addresses the management of massive and submassive pulmonary embolism (PE), iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (IFDVT),and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). The goal is to provide practical advice to enable the busy clinician to optimize the management of patients with these severe manifestations of VTE. Although this document makes recommendations for management, optimal medical decisions must incorporate other factors, including patient wishes, quality of life, and life expectancy based on age and comorbidities. The appropriateness of these recommendations for a specific patient may vary depending on these factors and will be best judged by the bedside clinician.

Endovascular thrombolysis using monteplase for non-chronic deep venous thrombosis

This study was designed to evaluate the usefulness of endovascular thrombolysis using monteplase for deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Between December 2005 and October 2009, at our institution nine endovascular thrombolysis treatments with monteplase were performed for symptomatic DVT in eight patients (6 women, 2 men; mean age, 56 (range, 15-80) years). In all, systemic anticoagulation administered by the peripheral intravenous route with heparin and/or thrombolysis with urokinase followed by anticoagulation with orally administered warfarin had been performed, and subsequently six endovascular treatments without monteplase were administered. However, DVT persisted, and endovascular treatments with monteplase were tried. In six (67%) of the nine procedures, DVT completely or almost completely disappeared after endovascular thrombolysis with monteplase. Mean dose of monteplase used was 2,170,000 IU. There was only one procedure-related complication. In one patient, just after thrombolysis with monteplase, bleeding at the puncture site and gingival bleeding occurred. Bleeding was stopped by manual astriction only. Endovascular thrombolysis with monteplase may be an effective treatment for DVT, even in cases resistant to traditional systemic anticoagulation and thrombolysis and endovascular procedures without monteplase.

Late results of catheter-directed recombinant tissue plasminogen activator fibrinolytic therapy of iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of catheter-directed low-dose recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator infusion in the treatment of iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis and prevention of post-thrombotic syndrome.

METHOD

Eighteen patients (out of 260 evaluated) with acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis and no previous evidence of venous insufficiency were prospectively selected for thrombolytic therapy. Catheter-directed low-dose recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (1 mg/h) was infused into the thrombotic segments.

RESULTS

Effective fibrinolysis was achieved in 14 of 18 cases, with correlation between effective fibrinolysis and major/complete resolution of acute signs and symptoms (P <.01). There were no episodes of major complications. Four patients presented with early rethrombosis (1 to 8 weeks). Individuals were followed for a period up to 131 weeks (average, 85.2). The incidence of clinical signs and symptoms of venous insufficiency and duplex-scan findings of valvular reflux was significantly lower in the patients in which lytic therapy succeeded and patency was kept, compared with patients experiencing acute therapeutic failure or rethrombosis (P <.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator fibrinolytic therapy is safe and effective in the treatment of acute iliofemoral venous thrombosis. The late evolution as revealed clinically and by ultrasound was superior in patients for whom lytic therapy was effective.

Adjunctive Percutaneous Mechanical Thrombectomy for Lower-extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis: Clinical and Economic Outcomes

PURPOSE

To assess the clinical and economic benefits of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) alone versus CDT with rheolytic percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) for lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients with acute iliofemoral DVT treated with CDT with urokinase between 1997 and 2003 were identified. Demographic characteristics and clinical and economic outcomes were compared between patients treated with CDT alone versus CDT plus PMT.

RESULTS

Twenty-six limbs in 23 patients received CDT with urokinase, whereas 19 limbs in 14 patients were treated with CDT plus PMT. Mean treatment duration for CDT was 56.5 +/- 27.4 hours, compared with 30.3 +/- 17.8 hours for CDT plus PMT (P = .001). Mean urokinase dose for CDT was 6.70 +/- 5.9 million U compared with 2.95 +/- 1.82 million U for CDT plus PMT (P = .011). Urokinase CDT achieved complete clot lysis in 80.7% of limbs (n = 21) compared with 84.2% of limbs (n = 16) treated with CDT plus PMT (P = .764). The incidences of major bleeding (CDT, 7.7%; CDT plus PMT, 5.3%; P = .749) and pulmonary embolism (CDT, 3.8%; CDT plus PMT, 5.3%; P = .818) were similar. The mean urokinase and PMT device cost for CDT alone was $10,127 compared with $5,128 for CDT plus PMT (P = .026).

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous CDT with rheolytic PMT is as effective as CDT alone for acute iliofemoral DVT but requires significantly shorter treatment and lower lytic agent dose, resulting in lower costs. Randomized studies to confirm the benefits of pharmacomechanical thrombolysis in the treatment of DVT are warranted.

Safety of Thrombolytic Therapy with Urokinase or Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Peripheral Arterial Occlusion:A Comprehensive Compilation of Published Work

PURPOSE

To report a comprehensive literature review focused on comparing the risk of complications with urokinase versus recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) for thrombolytic treatment of peripheral arterial occlusions.

METHODS

The English-language literature between 1985 and 2002 was searched for studies that used tissue-derived urokinase or rtPA in the treatment of peripheral arterial occlusions. Forty-eight studies (22 urokinase, 22 rtPA, and 4 that included both treatments) were identified, encompassing 2226 urokinase-treated patients and 1927 rtPA-treated patients. The safety of each thrombolytic agent was assessed based on the incidence of major hemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage, major limb amputation, transfusions, and mortality.

RESULTS

The review revealed a wide range of study protocols, patient conditions, ages of occlusions, dosages/delivery methods of lytic agents, and criteria for reporting complications. The incidence of major hemorrhage varied widely, but the overall rate was lower among urokinase-treated patients (6.2%) than for patients treated with rtPA (8.4%, p=0.007). The overall incidence of intracerebral hemorrhage was also significantly lower for urokinase (0.4% versus 1.1% for rtPA, p=0.020). The major amputation rate was similar for both treatments (urokinase 7.9%, rtPA 7.2%), but the mortality rate was significantly lower for urokinase (3.0% versus 5.6% for rtPA, p<0.001). The need for transfusions was less frequent with urokinase (11.1% versus 16.1%, p=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

These results from a large body of published literature suggest that urokinase may be associated with a lower incidence of complications than rtPA in the treatment of peripheral arterial occlusions.

Pharmacomechanical Thrombolysis and Early Stent Placement for Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis

PURPOSE

To evaluate an approach to the treatment of iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT) that included pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis with reteplase and the Helix mechanical thrombectomy device, followed by early stent placement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During 3-year period, 23 symptomatic limbs in 18 patients with iliofemoral DVT were treated with reteplase catheter-directed thrombolysis. After an initial infusion of 8 to 16 hours, any residual acute thrombus over a long segment (> 10 cm) was treated by maceration with use of the Helix thrombectomy device. Residual short-segment (< 10 cm) iliac vein thrombus and/or stenosis were treated with stent placement. Technical success, clinical success, complications, thrombolytic infusion time, total thrombolytic agent dose, fibrinogen level changes, and late limb status were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in 23 of 23 limbs (100%). Clinical success was achieved in 22 of 23 limbs (96%). Complete or partial thrombolysis was observed in 19 of 23 limbs (83%). Major bleeding was observed in one patient (6%) and necessitated blood transfusion. Mean per-limb thrombolytic infusion time and total dose were 19.6 hours +/- 8.1 and 13.8 U +/- 5.3 reteplase, respectively. Mean serum fibrinogen nadir and percentage drop in serum fibrinogen were 282 mg/dL +/- 167 and 47% +/- 24%, respectively. Late (mean, 19.8 +/- 11.6 months) modified Venous Disability Scores were 0 (none) for six limbs, 1 (mild) for 10 limbs, 2 (moderate) for two limbs, and 3 (severe) for no limbs.

CONCLUSION

In a preliminary experience, pharmacomechanical catheter-directed iliofemoral DVT thrombolysis with early stent placement was safe and effective.

Comparison of Urokinase, Alteplase, and Reteplase for Catheter-directed Thrombolysis of Deep Venous Thrombosis

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy, safety, and costs associated with catheter-directed thrombolysis with urokinase (UK) and the recombinant agents alteplase (tissue plasminogen activator [TPA]) and reteplase (recombinant plasminogen activator [RPA]) in the treatment of symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective analysis on 74 patients (82 limbs) who underwent treatment for DVT. Thrombosed extremities were treated with either urokinase with therapeutic heparin dosing (UK group; 38 limbs), alteplase with subtherapeutic heparin dosing (TPA group; 32 limbs), or reteplase with subtherapeutic heparin dosing (RPA group; 12 limbs). Infusion times, dosages, drug costs, success rates, and complications were compared among the groups.

RESULTS

Gender, age, disease location, duration of symptoms, and use of additional interventional therapies did not differ statistically among the three cohorts. Median hourly infused doses, total doses, infusion times, drug costs, and success rates per limb were: UK, 11.3 (10(4)) U/hour, 4.361 million U, 40.6 hours, US dollars 6577, 97.4%; TPA, 0.57 mg/hour, 21.6 mg, 30.8 hours, US dollars 488, 96.9%; RPA, 0.74 U/hour, 21.4 U, 24.3 hours, US dollars 1787, 100.0%. Major and overall complication rates were: UK, 5.3% and 10.5%; TPA, 3.1% and 12.5%; RPA, 8.3% and 16.7%. Infusion times, success rates, and complications were not statistically different among the three groups. Alteplase and reteplase were significantly less expensive than urokinase (P <.001 and P <.01, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Catheter-directed thrombolysis for the treatment of DVT is safe and effective, regardless of the agent used. However, the new recombinant agents are significantly less expensive than urokinase.

Catheter-directed Thrombolytic Therapy for Limb Ischemia: Current Status and Controversies

Absence of urokinase from the United States market for the past 4 years has resulted in increasing experience with other plasminogen activators in catheter-directed thrombolytic therapy. The differences in the pharmacologic properties and biologic behavior of these agents may translate into clinical outcomes that are distinct. Some of these manifestations can be predicted based on the existing large clinical trials in the acute myocardial infarction literature. However, because of the fundamental differences in techniques and thrombolytic regimens, extrapolation of the coronary data may not always predict the performance of these agents in peripheral catheter-directed fibrinolysis. In this article, the current status of the available lytic agents in the treatment of limb ischemia is reviewed.

Catheter-directed Thrombolytic Therapy for Limb Ischemia: Current Status and Controversies

Absence of urokinase from the United States market for the past 4 years has resulted in increasing experience with other plasminogen activators in catheter-directed thrombolytic therapy. The differences in the pharmacologic properties and biologic behavior of these agents may translate into clinical outcomes that are distinct. Some of these manifestations can be predicted based on the existing large clinical trials in the acute myocardial infarction literature. However, because of the fundamental differences in techniques and thrombolytic regimens, extrapolation of the coronary data may not always predict the performance of these agents in peripheral catheter-directed fibrinolysis. In this article, the current status of the available lytic agents in the treatment of limb ischemia is reviewed.