Morphology of Rhizostomeae jellyfishes: What is known and what we advanced since the 1970s

The morphology of members of the order Rhizostomeae is revisited considering all life cycle stages, but with emphasis on the medusa. The current classification of the group is presented, and some aspects of species diversity are discussed. The main issues investigated since the 1970s are briefly presented by decade.

Approaches and findings in histological and micromorphological research on Rhizostomeae

The substantial development of microscopic techniques and histological examination methods during the past five decades allowed for many new insights into the histology and microanatomy of Rhizostomeae. The present review focuses on new findings about histologically important structures: nerves, senses, muscles, gonads, zooxanthellae and nematocysts. Different ontogenetic stages of rhizostome species were included in the literature research, supplemented with the authors' unpublished data and figures. The overview of the research results reveals that the application of chemo- and immunohistochemical techniques have provided deeper insights into neuronal and sensory structures and their interconnections. Modern microscopic methods led to new findings on the histological gonadal organization and details of the processes of gametogenesis, fertilization, cleavage, gastrulation, and brooding. Advanced optical methods also allowed for a better understanding of Rhizostomeae-zooxanthellae associations and the morphology and function of nematocysts. Improvements in molecular biology allowed for more precise identification of zooxanthellae associated with rhizostome species. Although there has been significant progress in all of the research subjects covered here, we identify several knowledge gaps and conclude with some recommendations for future research.

Morphological and molecular data in the study of the evolution, population genetics and taxonomy of Rhizostomeae

Rhizostomeae research based on morphological approaches was reinforced and diversified by new techniques after the 1970s, including developing methodologies for phylogenetic analysis, the rise of the polymerase chain reaction, and the emergence of different sequencing technologies. Here, we summarize the contribution of morphological and molecular data to the study of the classification and phylogenetic relationships of Rhizostomeae in addition to the use of molecular data in studies at the population, species, and supraspecific levels. Throughout the history of the study of the Rhizostomeae systematics, morphological data have been neglected when it comes to phylogenetic inferences, which is reflected in the lack of a phylogenetic analysis of the taxa within Rhizostomeae based on phenotypic characters of the adult medusa. Concerning molecular data, ca. 3,200 nucleotide sequences are available in GenBank and are mainly used for discovering, delimiting, describing, and identifying species. Molecular approaches have also allowed species monitoring by qPCR and metabarcoding of environmental DNA, as well as unveiling the distribution and genetic diversity of jellyfish populations, shedding light on introduction events, conservation, and health of edible jellyfish stocks. Nucleotide sequences have also been key for the development of phylogenetic hypotheses that serve as basis for investigations on the origin and diversification of morphological, ecological, and behavioral traits within Cnidaria; however, despite the progress achieved, phylogenetic uncertainty still exists, especially within the formerly known superfamily Inscapulatae. Future directions in Rhizostomeae research involve generating molecular and morphological data of neglected taxa, which represents a golden opportunity to understand the evolution of Rhizostomeae.

Characterization of the populations of upside-down jellyfish in Jardines de la Reina National Park, Cuba

Upside-down jellyfish are a group of benthic scyphozoans belonging to the genus Cassiopea, whose members are in symbiosis with dinoflagellates and inhabit tropical and subtropical waters. Although there are some studies of the genus in the Caribbean, these are limited. In Cuba, the group's studies are restricted to reports on taxonomic lists and, as far as we know, no one has performed any analyzes of the densities of these jellyfish in seagrass or mangrove ecosystems in Cuba. In this work, the populations of Cassiopea spp. in Jardines de la Reina National Park (JRNP) were characterized, for the first time for this Marine Protected Area and Cuba. One hundred 1m² square frames were placed at 14 JRNP sites. For each site, the species, density, size of the individuals and abiotic factors were determined. Density and diameter comparisons were made between sites, zones and regions within the JRNP. The percentage of the benthic cover was determined and a correlation was made between density and diameter. A total of 10,803 individuals were recorded, of which 7,618 belong to Cassiopea xamachana and 3,185 belong to Cassiopea frondosa. Both species share a niche and no evident segregation was detected according to abiotic variables. Significant differences were detected in comparisons of density and size across sites and zones. Density and size in the JRNP were negatively correlated, and higher aggregations of the species were observed at lower sizes. Density mean values ranged from 2.18 to 14.52 ind. /m² with maximum values of 79 ind. /m². Cayo Alcatraz was the site found to have the highest density while Cachiboca was the site with the lowest density. The average bell diameter size of the individuals ranged from 9.34 to 15.31 cm for the sampled sites, with minimum and maximum values of 2.5 cm and 32.6 cm. The smallest size was recorded at Cayo Alcatraz while the largest size was reported for Boca de las Anclitas. The environmental factors evaluated showed no significant relationship with the density or diameter of Cassiopea, while the Thalassia testudinum cover was negatively correlated with Cassiopea density at all fourteen sites in the JRNP. The percentage of Cassiopea coverage was higher than those reported in the literature, with four sites exceeding 20% coverage. In general, the populations of Cassiopea spp. in the JRNP did not differ greatly, although a higher density was observed towards the eastern region of the park. It was shown for the first time for the species that density and size have a negative correlation. Future studies are required to quantify the impact of Cassiopea on coastal marine ecosystem processes, and to further determine how anthropogenic changes may be altering the function of these tropical ecosystems.