A sequence-specific transcription activator motif and powerful synthetic variants that bind Mediator using a fuzzy protein interface

Hierarchy in regulator interactions with distant transcriptional activation domains empowers rheostatic regulation

Transcription factors carry long intrinsically disordered regions often containing multiple activation domains. Despite numerous recent high-throughput identifications and characterizations of activation domains, the interplay between sequence motifs, activation domains, and regulator binding in intrinsically disordered transcription factor regions remains unresolved. Here, we map sequence motifs and activation domains in an Arabidopsis thaliana NAC transcription factor clade, revealing that although sequence motifs and activation domains often coincide, no systematic overlap exists. Biophysical analyses using NMR spectroscopy show that the long intrinsically disordered region of senescence-associated transcription factor ANAC046 is devoid of residual structure. We identify two activation domain/sequence motif regions, one at each end that both bind a panel of six positive and negative regulator domains from biologically relevant regulators promiscuously. Binding affinities measured using isothermal titration calorimetry reveal a hierarchy for regulator binding of the two ANAC046 activation domain/sequence motif regions defining these as regulatory hotspots. Despite extensive dynamic intramolecular contacts along the disordered chain revealed using paramagnetic relaxation enhancement experiments and simulations, the regions remain uncoupled in binding. Together, the results imply rheostatic regulation by ANAC046 through concentration-dependent regulator competition, a mechanism likely mirrored in other transcription factors with distantly located activation domains.

Boosting transcriptional activities by employing repeated activation domains in transcription factors

Enhancing the transcriptional activation activity of transcription factors (TFs) has multiple applications in organism improvement, metabolic engineering, and other aspects of plant science, but the approaches remain unclear. Here, we used gene activation assays and genetic transformation to investigate the transcriptional activities of two MYB TFs, PRODUCTION OF ANTHOCYANIN PIGMENT 1 (AtPAP1) from Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and EsMYBA1 from Epimedium (Epimedium sagittatum), and their synthetic variants in a range of plant species from several families. Using anthocyanin biosynthesis as a convenient readout, we discovered that homologous naturally occurring TFs showed differences in the transcriptional activation ability and that similar TFs induced large changes in the genetic program when heterologously expressed in different species. In some cases, shuffling the DNA-binding domains and transcriptional activation domains (ADs) between homologous TFs led to synthetic TFs that had stronger activation potency than the original TFs. More importantly, synthetic TFs derived from MYB, NAC, bHLH, and ethylene-insensitive3-like (EIL) family members containing tandemly repeated ADs had greatly enhanced activity compared to their natural counterparts. These findings enhance our understanding of TF activity and demonstrate that employing tandemly repeated ADs from natural TFs is a simple and widely applicable strategy to enhance the activation potency of synthetic TFs.

The Role of Med15 Sequence Features in Transcription Factor Interactions

Med15 is a general transcriptional regulator and tail module subunit within the RNA Pol II mediator complex. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Med15 protein has a well-structured N-terminal KIX domain, three activator binding domains (ABDs) and several naturally variable polyglutamine (poly-Q) tracts (Q1, Q2, Q3) embedded in an intrinsically disordered central region, and a C-terminal mediator association domain (MAD). We investigated how the presence of ABDs and changes in length and composition of poly-Q tracts influences Med15 activity using phenotypic, gene expression, transcription factor interaction and phase separation assays of truncation, deletion, and synthetic alleles. We found that individual Med15 activities were influenced by the number of activator binding domains (ABDs) and adjacent polyglutamine tract composition. Robust Med15 activity required at least the Q1 tract and the length of that tract modulated activity in a context-dependent manner. Reduced Msn2-dependent transcriptional activation due to Med15 Q1 tract variation correlated with reduced Msn2:Med15 interaction strength, but interaction strength did not always mirror phase separation propensity. We also observed that distant glutamine tracts and Med15 phosphorylation affected the activities of the KIX domain, and interaction studies revealed that intramolecular interactions may affect some Med15-transcription factor interactions.

Conservation of function without conservation of amino acid sequence in intrinsically disordered transcriptional activation domains

Protein function is canonically believed to be more conserved than amino acid sequence, but this idea is only well supported in folded domains, where highly diverged sequences can fold into equivalent 3D structures. In contrast, intrinsically disordered protein regions (IDRs) do not fold into a stable 3D structure, thus it remains unknown when and how function is conserved for IDRs that experience rapid amino acid sequence divergence. As a model system for studying the evolution of IDRs, we examined transcriptional activation domains, the regions of transcription factors that bind to coactivator complexes. We systematically identified activation domains on 502 orthologs of the transcriptional activator Gcn4 spanning 600 MY of fungal evolution. We find that the central activation domain shows strong conservation of function without conservation of sequence. This conservation of function without conservation of sequence is facilitated by evolutionary turnover (gain and loss) of key acidic and aromatic residues, the positions most important for function. This high sequence flexibility of functional orthologs mirrors the physical flexibility of the activation domain coactivator interaction interface, suggesting that physical flexibility enables evolutionary plasticity. We propose that turnover of short functional elements, sometimes individual amino acids, is a general mechanism for conservation of function without conservation of sequence during IDR evolution.

Fuzzy protein-DNA interactions and beyond: A common theme in transcription?

Gene expression regulation requires both diversity and specificity. How can these two contradictory conditions be reconciled? Dynamic DNA recognition mechanisms lead to heterogeneous bound conformations, which can be shifted by the cellular cues. Here we summarise recent experimental evidence on how fuzzy interactions contribute to chromatin remodelling, regulation of DNA replication and repair and transcription factor binding. We describe how the binding mode continuum between DNA and regulatory factors lead to variable, multisite contact patterns; polyelectrolyte competitions; on-the-fly shape readouts; autoinhibition controlled by posttranslational modifications or dynamic oligomerisation mechanisms. Increasing experimental evidence supports the rugged energy landscape of the bound protein-DNA assembly, modulation of which leads to distinct functional outcomes. Recent results suggest the evolutionary conservation of these combinatorial mechanisms with moderate sequence constraints in the malleable transcriptional machinery.

Grammar rules and exceptions for the language of transcriptional activation domains

Transcriptional activation domains (ADs) of gene activators have remained enigmatic for decades as short, extremely variable, and structurally disordered sequences. Using a rational design and high throughput in vivo experimentation, we determine the grammar rules and exceptions for the language of ADs. According to identified rules, billions of highly active ADs can be composed of balanced amounts of acidic/aromatic amino acids, with either mixed composition of aromatic residues, or using only one aromatic residue mixed with acidic residues. However, equally active sequences can be composed of only aliphatic leucine and aspartic acid residues. The much rarer LD exceptions have a higher ratio of hydrophobic/acidic balance and display a specific LDL(L/D)DLL motif. For aromatic/acidic Ads, the intermixing of proline residues in context of amphipathic α-helix structures significantly increases the AD activity. The identified grammar rules and exceptions are interpreted in application to the biochemistry of AD function and eukaryotic gene expression.

The Enigma of Transcriptional Activation Domains

Activation domains (ADs) of eukaryotic gene activators remain enigmatic for decades as short, extremely variable sequences which often are intrinsically disordered in structure and interact with an uncertain number of targets. The general absence of specificity increasingly complicates the utilization of the widely accepted mechanism of AD function by recruitment of coactivators. The long-standing enigma at the heart of molecular biology demands a fundamental rethinking of established concepts. Here, we review the experimental evidence supporting a novel mechanistic model of gene activation, based on ADs functioning via surfactant-like near-stochastic interactions with gene promoter nucleosomes. This new model is consistent with recent information-rich experimental data obtained using high-throughput synthetic biology and bioinformatics analysis methods, including machine learning. We clarify why the conventional biochemical principle of specificity for sequence, structures, and interactions fails to explain activation domain function. This perspective provides connections to the liquid-liquid phase separation model, signifies near-stochastic interactions as fundamental for the biochemical function, and can be generalized to other cellular functions.

High-throughput affinity measurements of direct interactions between activation domains and co-activators

Sequence-specific activation by transcription factors is essential for gene regulation1,2. Key to this are activation domains, which often fall within disordered regions of transcription factors3,4 and recruit co-activators to initiate transcription5. These interactions are difficult to characterize via most experimental techniques because they are typically weak and transient6,7. Consequently, we know very little about whether these interactions are promiscuous or specific, the mechanisms of binding, and how these interactions tune the strength of gene activation. To address these questions, we developed a microfluidic platform for expression and purification of hundreds of activation domains in parallel followed by direct measurement of co-activator binding affinities (STAMMPPING, for Simultaneous Trapping of Affinity Measurements via a Microfluidic Protein-Protein INteraction Generator). By applying STAMMPPING to quantify direct interactions between eight co-activators and 204 human activation domains (>1,500 K ds), we provide the first quantitative map of these interactions and reveal 334 novel binding pairs. We find that the metazoan-specific co-activator P300 directly binds >100 activation domains, potentially explaining its widespread recruitment across the genome to influence transcriptional activation. Despite sharing similar molecular properties (e.g. enrichment of negative and hydrophobic residues), activation domains utilize distinct biophysical properties to recruit certain co-activator domains. Co-activator domain affinity and occupancy are well-predicted by analytical models that account for multivalency, and in vitro affinities quantitatively predict activation in cells with an ultrasensitive response. Not only do our results demonstrate the ability to measure affinities between even weak protein-protein interactions in high throughput, but they also provide a necessary resource of over 1,500 activation domain/co-activator affinities which lays the foundation for understanding the molecular basis of transcriptional activation.

Systematic identification of transcriptional activation domains from non-transcription factor proteins in plants and yeast

Transcription factors can promote gene expression through activation domains. Whole-genome screens have systematically mapped activation domains in transcription factors but not in non-transcription factor proteins (e.g., chromatin regulators and coactivators). To fill this knowledge gap, we employed the activation domain predictor PADDLE to analyze the proteomes of Arabidopsis thaliana and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We screened 18,000 predicted activation domains from >800 non-transcription factor genes in both species, confirming that 89% of candidate proteins contain active fragments. Our work enables the annotation of hundreds of nuclear proteins as putative coactivators, many of which have never been ascribed any function in plants. Analysis of peptide sequence compositions reveals how the distribution of key amino acids dictates activity. Finally, we validated short, "universal" activation domains with comparable performance to state-of-the-art activation domains used for genome engineering. Our approach enables the genome-wide discovery and annotation of activation domains that can function across diverse eukaryotes.

Fuzzy recognition by the prokaryotic transcription factor HigA2 from Vibrio cholerae

Disordered protein sequences can exhibit different binding modes, ranging from well-ordered folding-upon-binding to highly dynamic fuzzy binding. The primary function of the intrinsically disordered region of the antitoxin HigA2 from Vibrio cholerae is to neutralize HigB2 toxin through ultra-high-affinity folding-upon-binding interaction. Here, we show that the same intrinsically disordered region can also mediate fuzzy interactions with its operator DNA and, through interplay with the folded helix-turn-helix domain, regulates transcription from the higBA2 operon. NMR, SAXS, ITC and in vivo experiments converge towards a consistent picture where a specific set of residues in the intrinsically disordered region mediate electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions while "hovering" over the DNA operator. Sensitivity of the intrinsically disordered region to scrambling the sequence, position-specific contacts and absence of redundant, multivalent interactions, point towards a more specific type of fuzzy binding. Our work demonstrates how a bacterial regulator achieves dual functionality by utilizing two distinct interaction modes within the same disordered sequence.

Commonly asked questions about transcriptional activation domains

Eukaryotic transcription factors activate gene expression with their DNA-binding domains and activation domains. DNA-binding domains bind the genome by recognizing structurally related DNA sequences; they are structured, conserved, and predictable from protein sequences. Activation domains recruit chromatin modifiers, coactivator complexes, or basal transcriptional machinery via structurally diverse protein-protein interactions. Activation domains and DNA-binding domains have been called independent, modular units, but there are many departures from modularity, including interactions between these regions and overlap in function. Compared to DNA-binding domains, activation domains are poorly understood because they are poorly conserved, intrinsically disordered, and difficult to predict from protein sequences. This review, organized around commonly asked questions, describes recent progress that the field has made in understanding the sequence features that control activation domains and predicting them from sequence.

Molecular switching in transcription through splicing and proline-isomerization regulates stress responses in plants

The Arabidopsis thaliana DREB2A transcription factor interacts with the negative regulator RCD1 and the ACID domain of subunit 25 of the transcriptional co-regulator mediator (Med25) to integrate stress signals for gene expression, with elusive molecular interplay. Using biophysical and structural analyses together with high-throughput screening, we reveal a bivalent binding switch in DREB2A containing an ACID-binding motif (ABS) and the known RCD1-binding motif (RIM). The RIM is lacking in a stress-induced DREB2A splice variant with retained transcriptional activity. ABS and RIM bind to separate sites on Med25-ACID, and NMR analyses show a structurally heterogeneous complex deriving from a DREB2A-ABS proline residue populating cis- and trans-isomers with remote impact on the RIM. The cis-isomer stabilizes an α-helix, while the trans-isomer may introduce energetic frustration facilitating rapid exchange between activators and repressors. Thus, DREB2A uses a post-transcriptionally and post-translationally modulated switch for transcriptional regulation.

Rational optimization of a transcription factor activation domain inhibitor

Transcription factors are among the most attractive therapeutic targets but are considered largely 'undruggable' in part due to the intrinsically disordered nature of their activation domains. Here we show that the aromatic character of the activation domain of the androgen receptor, a therapeutic target for castration-resistant prostate cancer, is key for its activity as transcription factor, allowing it to translocate to the nucleus and partition into transcriptional condensates upon activation by androgens. On the basis of our understanding of the interactions stabilizing such condensates and of the structure that the domain adopts upon condensation, we optimized the structure of a small-molecule inhibitor previously identified by phenotypic screening. The optimized compounds had more affinity for their target, inhibited androgen-receptor-dependent transcriptional programs, and had an antitumorigenic effect in models of castration-resistant prostate cancer in cells and in vivo. These results suggest that it is possible to rationally optimize, and potentially even to design, small molecules that target the activation domains of oncogenic transcription factors.

Clusters of acidic and hydrophobic residues can predict acidic transcriptional activation domains from protein sequence

Transcription factors activate gene expression in development, homeostasis, and stress with DNA binding domains and activation domains. Although there exist excellent computational models for predicting DNA binding domains from protein sequence, models for predicting activation domains from protein sequence have lagged, particularly in metazoans. We recently developed a simple and accurate predictor of acidic activation domains on human transcription factors. Here, we show how the accuracy of this human predictor arises from the clustering of aromatic, leucine, and acidic residues, which together are necessary for acidic activation domain function. When we combine our predictor with the predictions of convolutional neural network (CNN) models trained in yeast, the intersection is more accurate than individual models, emphasizing that each approach carries orthogonal information. We synthesize these findings into a new set of activation domain predictions on human transcription factors.

Systematic identification of transcriptional activator domains from non-transcription factor proteins in plants and yeast

Transcription factors promote gene expression via trans-regulatory activation domains. Although whole genome scale screens in model organisms (e.g. human, yeast, fly) have helped identify activation domains from transcription factors, such screens have been less extensively used to explore the occurrence of activation domains in non-transcription factor proteins, such as transcriptional coactivators, chromatin regulators and some cytosolic proteins, leaving a blind spot on what role activation domains in these proteins could play in regulating transcription. We utilized the activation domain predictor PADDLE to mine the entire proteomes of two model eukaryotes, Arabidopsis thaliana and Saccharomyces cerevisiae ( 1 ). We characterized 18,000 fragments covering predicted activation domains from >800 non-transcription factor genes in both species, and experimentally validated that 89% of proteins contained fragments capable of activating transcription in yeast. Peptides with similar sequence composition show a broad range of activities, which is explained by the arrangement of key amino acids. We also annotated hundreds of nuclear proteins with activation domains as putative coactivators; many of which have never been ascribed any function in plants. Furthermore, our library contains >250 non-nuclear proteins containing peptides with activation domain function across both eukaryotic lineages, suggesting that there are unknown biological roles of these peptides beyond transcription. Finally, we identify and validate short, 'universal' eukaryotic activation domains that activate transcription in both yeast and plants with comparable or stronger performance to state-of-the-art activation domains. Overall, our dual host screen provides a blueprint on how to systematically discover novel genetic parts for synthetic biology that function across a wide diversity of eukaryotes.

Significance Statement

Activation domains promote transcription and play a critical role in regulating gene expression. Although the mapping of activation domains from transcription factors has been carried out in previous genome-wide screens, their occurrence in non-transcription factors has been less explored. We utilize an activation domain predictor to mine the entire proteomes of Arabidopsis thaliana and Saccharomyces cerevisiae for new activation domains on non-transcription factor proteins. We validate peptides derived from >750 non-transcription factor proteins capable of activating transcription, discovering many potentially new coactivators in plants. Importantly, we identify novel genetic parts that can function across both species, representing unique synthetic biology tools.

Transcription factor clusters enable target search but do not contribute to target gene activation

Many transcription factors (TFs) localize in nuclear clusters of locally increased concentrations, but how TF clustering is regulated and how it influences gene expression is not well understood. Here, we use quantitative microscopy in living cells to study the regulation and function of clustering of the budding yeast TF Gal4 in its endogenous context. Our results show that Gal4 forms clusters that overlap with the GAL loci. Cluster number, density and size are regulated in different growth conditions by the Gal4-inhibitor Gal80 and Gal4 concentration. Gal4 truncation mutants reveal that Gal4 clustering is facilitated by, but does not completely depend on DNA binding and intrinsically disordered regions. Moreover, we discover that clustering acts as a double-edged sword: self-interactions aid TF recruitment to target genes, but recruited Gal4 molecules that are not DNA-bound do not contribute to, and may even inhibit, transcription activation. We propose that cells need to balance the different effects of TF clustering on target search and transcription activation to facilitate proper gene expression.

Interaction modules that impart specificity to disordered protein

Intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) are especially enriched among proteins that regulate chromatin and transcription. As a result, mechanisms that influence specificity of IDR-driven interactions have emerged as exciting unresolved issues for understanding gene regulation. We review the molecular elements frequently found within IDRs that confer regulatory specificity. In particular, we summarize the differing roles of disordered low-complexity regions (LCRs) and short linear motifs (SLiMs) towards selective nuclear regulation. Examination of IDR-driven interactions highlights SLiMs as organizers of selectivity, with widespread roles in gene regulation and integration of cellular signals. Analysis of recurrent interactions between SLiMs and folded domains suggests diverse avenues for SLiMs to influence phase-separated condensates and highlights opportunities to manipulate these interactions for control of biological activity.

Molecular insights into alginate β-lactoglobulin A multivalencies-The foundation for their amorphous aggregates and coacervation

For improved control of biomaterial property design, a better understanding of complex coacervation involving anionic polysaccharides and proteins is needed. Here, we address the initial steps in condensate formation of β-lactoglobulin A (β-LgA) with nine defined alginate oligosaccharides (AOSs) and describe their multivalent interactions in structural detail. Binding of AOSs containing four, five, or six uronic acid residues (UARs), either all mannuronate (M), all guluronate (G), or alternating M and G embodying the block structural components of alginates, was characterized by isothermal titration calorimetry, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR), and molecular docking. β-LgA was highly multivalent exhibiting binding stoichiometries decreasing from five to two AOSs with increasing degree of polymerization (DP) and similar affinities in the mid micromolar range. The different AOS binding sites on β-LgA were identified by NMR chemical shift perturbation analyses and showed diverse compositions of charged, polar and hydrophobic residues. Distinct sites for the shorter AOSs merged to accommodate longer AOSs. The AOSs bound dynamically to β-LgA, as concluded from saturation transfer difference and 1 H-ligand-targeted NMR analyses. Molecular docking using Glide within the Schrödinger suite 2016-1 revealed the orientation of AOSs to only vary slightly at the preferred β-LgA binding site resulting in similar XP glide scores. The multivalency coupled with highly dynamic AOS binding with lack of confined conformations in the β-LgA complexes may help explain the first steps toward disordered β-LgA alginate coacervate structures.

Protein interactions: anything new?

How do proteins interact in the cellular environment? Which interactions stabilize liquid-liquid phase separated condensates? Are the concepts, which have been developed for specific protein complexes also applicable to higher-order assemblies? Recent discoveries prompt for a universal framework for protein interactions, which can be applied across the scales of protein communities. Here, we discuss how our views on protein interactions have evolved from rigid structures to conformational ensembles of proteins and discuss the open problems, in particular related to biomolecular condensates. Protein interactions have evolved to follow changes in the cellular environment, which manifests in multiple modes of interactions between the same partners. Such cellular context-dependence requires multiplicity of binding modes (MBM) by sampling multiple minima of the interaction energy landscape. We demonstrate that the energy landscape framework of protein folding can be applied to explain this phenomenon, opening a perspective toward a physics-based, universal model for cellular protein behaviors.

αα-hub coregulator structure and flexibility determine transcription factor binding and selection in regulatory interactomes

Formation of transcription factor (TF)-coregulator complexes is a key step in transcriptional regulation, with coregulators having essential functions as hub nodes in molecular networks. How specificity and selectivity are maintained in these nodes remain open questions. In this work, we addressed specificity in transcriptional networks using complexes formed between TFs and αα-hubs, which are defined by a common αα-hairpin secondary structure motif, as a model. Using NMR spectroscopy and binding thermodynamics, we analyzed the structure, dynamics, stability, and ligand-binding properties of the Arabidopsis thaliana RST domains from TAF4 and known binding partner RCD1, and the TAFH domain from human TAF4, allowing comparison across species, functions, and architectural contexts. While these αα-hubs shared the αα-hairpin motif, they differed in length and orientation of accessory helices as well as in their thermodynamic profiles of ligand binding. Whereas biologically relevant RCD1-ligand pairs displayed high affinity driven by enthalpy, TAF4-ligand interactions were entropy driven and exhibited less binding-induced structuring. We in addition identified a thermal unfolding state with a structured core for all three domains, although the temperature sensitivity differed. Thermal stability studies suggested that initial unfolding of the RCD1-RST domain localized around helix 1, lending this region structural malleability, while effects in TAF4-RST were more stochastic, suggesting variability in structural adaptability upon binding. Collectively, our results support a model in which hub structure, flexibility, and binding thermodynamics contribute to αα-hub-TF binding specificity, a finding of general relevance to the understanding of coregulator-ligand interactions and interactome sizes.

Cryptic inhibitory regions nearby activation domains

Previously, the Nine amino acid TransActivation Domain (9aaTAD) was identified in the Gal4 region 862-870 (DDVYNYLFD). Here, we identified 9aaTADs in the distal Gal4 orthologs by our prediction algorithm and found their conservation in the family. The 9aaTAD function as strong activators was demonstrated. We identified adjacent Gal4 region 871-811 (DEDTPPNPKKE) as a natural 9aaTAD inhibitory domain located at the extreme Gal4 terminus. Moreover, we identified conserved Gal4 region 172-185 (FDWSEEDDMSDGLP), which was capable to reverse the 9aaTAD inhibition. In conclusion, our results uncover the existence of the cryptic inhibitory domains, which need to be carefully implemented in all functional studies with transcription factors to avoid incorrect conclusions.

Directed mutational scanning reveals a balance between acidic and hydrophobic residues in strong human activation domains

Acidic activation domains are intrinsically disordered regions of the transcription factors that bind coactivators. The intrinsic disorder and low evolutionary conservation of activation domains have made it difficult to identify the sequence features that control activity. To address this problem, we designed thousands of variants in seven acidic activation domains and measured their activities with a high-throughput assay in human cell culture. We found that strong activation domain activity requires a balance between the number of acidic residues and aromatic and leucine residues. These findings motivated a predictor of acidic activation domains that scans the human proteome for clusters of aromatic and leucine residues embedded in regions of high acidity. This predictor identifies known activation domains and accurately predicts previously unidentified ones. Our results support a flexible acidic exposure model of activation domains in which the acidic residues solubilize hydrophobic motifs so that they can interact with coactivators. A record of this paper's transparent peer review process is included in the supplemental information.

Compendium of human transcription factor effector domains

Transcription factors (TFs) regulate gene expression by binding to DNA sequences and modulating transcriptional activity through their effector domains. Despite the central role of effector domains in TF function, there is a current lack of a comprehensive resource and characterization of effector domains. Here, we provide a catalog of 924 effector domains across 594 human TFs. Using this catalog, we characterized the amino acid composition of effector domains, their conservation across species and across the human population, and their roles in human diseases. Furthermore, we provide a classification system for effector domains that constitutes a valuable resource and a blueprint for future experimental studies of TF effector domain function.

Molecular Determinants of Selectivity in Disordered Complexes May Shed Light on Specificity in Protein Condensates

Biomolecular condensates challenge the classical concepts of molecular recognition. The variable composition and heterogeneous conformations of liquid-like protein droplets are bottlenecks for high-resolution structural studies. To obtain atomistic insights into the organization of these assemblies, here we have characterized the conformational ensembles of specific disordered complexes, including those of droplet-driving proteins. First, we found that these specific complexes exhibit a high degree of conformational heterogeneity. Second, we found that residues forming contacts at the interface also sample many conformations. Third, we found that different patterns of contacting residues form the specific interface. In addition, we observed a wide range of sequence motifs mediating disordered interactions, including charged, hydrophobic and polar contacts. These results demonstrate that selective recognition can be realized by variable patterns of weakly defined interaction motifs in many different binding configurations. We propose that these principles also play roles in determining the selectivity of biomolecular condensates.

Transcription Factor Dynamics

To predict transcription, one needs a mechanistic understanding of how the numerous required transcription factors (TFs) explore the nuclear space to find their target genes, assemble, cooperate, and compete with one another. Advances in fluorescence microscopy have made it possible to visualize real-time TF dynamics in living cells, leading to two intriguing observations: first, most TFs contact chromatin only transiently; and second, TFs can assemble into clusters through their intrinsically disordered regions. These findings suggest that highly dynamic events and spatially structured nuclear microenvironments might play key roles in transcription regulation that are not yet fully understood. The emerging model is that while some promoters directly convert TF-binding events into on/off cycles of transcription, many others apply complex regulatory layers that ultimately lead to diverse phenotypic outputs. Cracking this kinetic code is an ongoing and challenging task that is made possible by combining innovative imaging approaches with biophysical models.

Activation of gene expression by detergent-like protein domains

The mechanisms by which transcriptional activation domains (tADs) initiate eukaryotic gene expression have been an enigma for decades because most tADs lack specificity in sequence, structure, and interactions with targets. Machine learning analysis of data sets of tAD sequences generated in vivo elucidated several functionality rules: the functional tAD sequences should (i) be devoid of or depleted with basic amino acid residues, (ii) be enriched with aromatic and acidic residues, (iii) be with aromatic residues localized mostly near the terminus of the sequence, and acidic residues localized more internally within a span of 20-30 amino acids, (iv) be with both aromatic and acidic residues preferably spread out in the sequence and not clustered, and (v) not be separated by occasional basic residues. These and other more subtle rules are not absolute, reflecting absence of a tAD consensus sequence, enormous variability, and consistent with surfactant-like tAD biochemical properties. The findings are compatible with the paradigm-shifting nucleosome detergent mechanism of gene expression activation, contributing to the development of the liquid-liquid phase separation model and the biochemistry of near-stochastic functional allosteric interactions.

Direct photoresponsive inhibition of a p53-like transcription activation domain in PIF3 by Arabidopsis phytochrome B

Photoactivated phytochrome B (PHYB) binds to antagonistically acting PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING transcription FACTORs (PIFs) to regulate hundreds of light responsive genes in Arabidopsis by promoting PIF degradation. However, whether PHYB directly controls the transactivation activity of PIFs remains ambiguous. Here we show that the prototypic PIF, PIF3, possesses a p53-like transcription activation domain (AD) consisting of a hydrophobic activator motif flanked by acidic residues. A PIF3mAD mutant, in which the activator motif is replaced with alanines, fails to activate PIF3 target genes in Arabidopsis, validating the functions of the PIF3 AD in vivo. Intriguingly, the N-terminal photosensory module of PHYB binds immediately adjacent to the PIF3 AD to repress PIF3’s transactivation activity, demonstrating a novel PHYB signaling mechanism through direct interference of the transactivation activity of PIF3. Our findings indicate that PHYB, likely also PHYA, controls the stability and activity of PIFs via structurally separable dual signaling mechanisms.

Photoactivated phytochrome B regulates gene expression by interacting with PIF transcription factors. Here the authors show that PIF3 contains a p53-like transcription activation domain (AD) and that PHYB can directly suppress PIF3 transactivation activity by binding adjacent to the AD.

Fuzzy protein theory for disordered proteins

Why proteins are fuzzy? Constant adaptation to the cellular environment requires a wide range of changes in protein structure and interactions. Conformational ensembles of disordered proteins in particular exhibit large shifts to activate or inhibit alternative pathways. Fuzziness is critical for liquid–liquid phase separation and conversion of biomolecular condensates into fibrils. Interpretation of these phenomena presents a challenge for the classical structure-function paradigm. Here I discuss a multi-valued formalism, based on fuzzy logic, which can be applied to describe complex cellular behavior of proteins.

Advances in targeting 'undruggable' transcription factors with small molecules

Transcription factors (TFs) represent key biological players in diseases including cancer, autoimmunity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease. However, outside nuclear receptors, TFs have traditionally been considered 'undruggable' by small-molecule ligands due to significant structural disorder and lack of defined small-molecule binding pockets. Renewed interest in the field has been ignited by significant progress in chemical biology approaches to ligand discovery and optimization, especially the advent of targeted protein degradation approaches, along with increasing appreciation of the critical role a limited number of collaborators play in the regulation of key TF effector genes. Here, we review current understanding of TF-mediated gene regulation, discuss successful targeting strategies and highlight ongoing challenges and emerging approaches to address them.

Simple biochemical features underlie transcriptional activation domain diversity and dynamic, fuzzy binding to Mediator

Gene activator proteins comprise distinct DNA-binding and transcriptional activation domains (ADs). Because few ADs have been described, we tested domains tiling all yeast transcription factors for activation in vivo and identified 150 ADs. By mRNA display, we showed that 73% of ADs bound the Med15 subunit of Mediator, and that binding strength was correlated with activation. AD-Mediator interaction in vitro was unaffected by a large excess of free activator protein, pointing to a dynamic mechanism of interaction. Structural modeling showed that ADs interact with Med15 without shape complementarity (‘fuzzy’ binding). ADs shared no sequence motifs, but mutagenesis revealed biochemical and structural constraints. Finally, a neural network trained on AD sequences accurately predicted ADs in human proteins and in other yeast proteins, including chromosomal proteins and chromatin remodeling complexes. These findings solve the longstanding enigma of AD structure and function and provide a rationale for their role in biology.

Cells adapt and respond to changes by regulating the activity of their genes. To turn genes on or off, they use a family of proteins called transcription factors. Transcription factors influence specific but overlapping groups of genes, so that each gene is controlled by several transcription factors that act together like a dimmer switch to regulate gene activity.

The presence of transcription factors attracts proteins such as the Mediator complex, which activates genes by gathering the protein machines that read the genes. The more transcription factors are found near a specific gene, the more strongly they attract Mediator and the more active the gene is. A specific region on the transcription factor called the activation domain is necessary for this process. The biochemical sequences of these domains vary greatly between species, yet activation domains from, for example, yeast and human proteins are often interchangeable.

To understand why this is the case, Sanborn et al. analyzed the genome of baker’s yeast and identified 150 activation domains, each very different in sequence. Three-quarters of them bound to a subunit of the Mediator complex called Med15. Sanborn et al. then developed a machine learning algorithm to predict activation domains in both yeast and humans. This algorithm also showed that negatively charged and greasy regions on the activation domains were essential to be activated by the Mediator complex.

Further analyses revealed that activation domains used different poses to bind multiple sites on Med15, a behavior known as ‘fuzzy’ binding. This creates a high overall affinity even though the binding strength at each individual site is low, enabling the protein complexes to remain dynamic. These weak interactions together permit fine control over the activity of several genes, allowing cells to respond quickly and precisely to many changes.

The computer algorithm used here provides a new way to identify activation domains across species and could improve our understanding of how living things grow, adapt and evolve. It could also give new insights into mechanisms of disease, particularly cancer, where transcription factors are often faulty.

Mediator subunit Med15 dictates the conserved "fuzzy" binding mechanism of yeast transcription activators Gal4 and Gcn4

The acidic activation domain (AD) of yeast transcription factor Gal4 plays a dual role in transcription repression and activation through binding to Gal80 repressor and Mediator subunit Med15. The activation function of Gal4 arises from two hydrophobic regions within the 40-residue AD. We show by NMR that each AD region binds the Mediator subunit Med15 using a “fuzzy” protein interface. Remarkably, comparison of chemical shift perturbations shows that Gal4 and Gcn4, two intrinsically disordered ADs of different sequence, interact nearly identically with Med15. The finding that two ADs of different sequence use an identical fuzzy binding mechanism shows a common sequence-independent mechanism for AD-Mediator binding, similar to interactions within a hydrophobic cloud. In contrast, the same region of Gal4 AD interacts strongly with Gal80 via a distinct structured complex, implying that the structured binding partner of an intrinsically disordered protein dictates the type of protein–protein interaction.

The intrinsically disordered acidic activation domain (AD) of the yeast transcription factor Gal4 acts through binding to the Med15 subunit of the Mediator complex. Here, the authors show that Gal4 interacts with Med15 through an identical fuzzy binding mechanism as Gcn4 AD, which has a different sequence, revealing a common sequence-independent mechanism for AD-Mediator binding. In contrast, Gal4 AD binds to the Gal80 repressor as a structured polypeptide, which strongly suggests that the structured binding partner dictates the type of protein–protein interaction for an intrinsically disordered protein.

Structure of mammalian Mediator complex reveals Tail module architecture and interaction with a conserved core

The Mediator complex plays an essential and multi-faceted role in regulation of RNA polymerase II transcription in all eukaryotes. Structural analysis of yeast Mediator has provided an understanding of the conserved core of the complex and its interaction with RNA polymerase II but failed to reveal the structure of the Tail module that contains most subunits targeted by activators and repressors. Here we present a molecular model of mammalian (Mus musculus) Mediator, derived from a 4.0 Å resolution cryo-EM map of the complex. The mammalian Mediator structure reveals that the previously unresolved Tail module, which includes a number of metazoan specific subunits, interacts extensively with core Mediator and has the potential to influence its conformation and interactions.

αα-Hub domains and intrinsically disordered proteins: A decisive combo

Hub proteins are central nodes in protein-protein interaction networks with critical importance to all living organisms. Recently, a new group of folded hub domains, the αα-hubs, was defined based on a shared αα-hairpin supersecondary structural foundation. The members PAH, RST, TAFH, NCBD, and HHD are found in large proteins such as Sin3, RCD1, TAF4, CBP, and harmonin, which organize disordered transcriptional regulators and membrane scaffolds in interactomes of importance to human diseases and plant quality. In this review, studies of structures, functions, and complexes across the αα-hubs are described and compared to provide a unified description of the group. This analysis expands the associated molecular concepts of "one domain-one binding site", motif-based ligand binding, and coupled folding and binding of intrinsically disordered ligands to additional concepts of importance to signal fidelity. These include context, motif reversibility, multivalency, complex heterogeneity, synergistic αα-hub:ligand folding, accessory binding sites, and supramodules. We propose that these multifaceted protein-protein interaction properties are made possible by the characteristics of the αα-hub fold, including supersite properties, dynamics, variable topologies, accessory helices, and malleability and abetted by adaptability of the disordered ligands. Critically, these features provide additional filters for specificity. With the presentations of new concepts, this review opens for new research questions addressing properties across the group, which are driven from concepts discovered in studies of the individual members. Combined, the members of the αα-hubs are ideal models for deconvoluting signal fidelity maintained by folded hubs and their interactions with intrinsically disordered ligands.

Mechanisms of Macromolecular Interactions Mediated by Protein Intrinsic Disorder

Intrinsically disordered proteins or regions (IDPs or IDRs) are widespread in the eukaryotic proteome. Although lacking stable three-dimensional structures in the free forms, IDRs perform critical functions in various cellular processes. Accordingly, mutations and altered expression of IDRs are associated with many pathological conditions. Hence, it is of great importance to understand at the molecular level how IDRs interact with their binding partners. In particular, discovering the unique interaction features of IDRs originating from their dynamic nature may reveal uncharted regulatory mechanisms of specific biological processes. Here we discuss the mechanisms of the macromolecular interactions mediated by IDRs and present the relevant cellular processes including transcription, cell cycle progression, signaling, and nucleocytoplasmic transport. Of special interest is the multivalent binding nature of IDRs driving assembly of multicomponent macromolecular complexes. Integrating the previous theoretical and experimental investigations, we suggest that such IDR-driven multiprotein complexes can function as versatile allosteric switches to process diverse cellular signals. Finally, we discuss the future challenges and potential medical applications of the IDR research.

Intrinsically Disordered Bacterial Polar Organizing Protein Z, PopZ, Interacts with Protein Binding Partners Through an N-terminal Molecular Recognition Feature

The polar organizing protein Z (PopZ) is necessary for the formation of three-dimensional microdomains at the cell poles in Caulobacter crescentus, where it functions as a hub protein that recruits multiple regulatory proteins from the cytoplasm. Although a large portion of the protein is predicted to be natively unstructured, in reconstituted systems PopZ can self-assemble into a macromolecular scaffold that directly binds to at least ten different proteins. Here we report the solution NMR structure of PopZ^Δ134-177, a truncated form of PopZ that does not self-assemble but retains the ability to interact with heterologous proteins. We show that the unbound form of PopZ^Δ134-177 is unstructured in solution, with the exception of a small amphipathic α-helix in residues M10-I17, which is included within a highly conserved region near the N-terminal. In applying NMR techniques to map the interactions between PopZ^Δ134-177 and one of its binding partners, RcdA, we find evidence that the α-helix and adjoining amino acids extending to position E23 serve as the core of the binding motif. Consistent with this, a point mutation at position I17 severely compromises binding. Our results show that a partially structured Molecular Recognition Feature (MoRF) within an intrinsically disordered domain of PopZ contributes to the assembly of polar microdomains, revealing a structural basis for complex network assembly in Alphaproteobacteria that is analogous to those formed by intrinsically disordered hub proteins in other kingdoms.

Unexpected specificity within dynamic transcriptional protein-protein complexes

A key functional event in eukaryotic gene activation is the formation of dynamic protein-protein interaction networks between transcriptional activators and transcriptional coactivators. Seemingly incongruent with the tight regulation of transcription, many biochemical and biophysical studies suggest that activators use nonspecific hydrophobic and/or electrostatic interactions to bind to coactivators, with few if any specific contacts. Here a mechanistic dissection of a set of representative dynamic activator•coactivator complexes, comprised of the ETV/PEA3 family of activators and the coactivator Med25, reveals a different molecular recognition model. The data demonstrate that small sequence variations within an activator family significantly redistribute the conformational ensemble of the complex while not affecting overall affinity, and distal residues within the activator-not often considered as contributing to binding-play a key role in mediating conformational redistribution. The ETV/PEA3•Med25 ensembles are directed by specific contacts between the disordered activator and the Med25 interface, which is facilitated by structural shifts of the coactivator binding surface. Taken together, these data highlight the critical role coactivator plasticity plays in recognition of disordered activators and indicate that molecular recognition models of disordered proteins must consider the ability of the binding partners to mediate specificity.

Dissecting the transactivation domain (tAD) of the transcription factor c-Myb to assess recent models of tAD function

Transcription factors use a DNA-binding domain to localize their action and a transactivation domain (tAD) to stimulate activation of the associated gene. Recent work has renewed interest in how tADs activate genes, which remains poorly understood. Key features in the new models are exposure of short linear motifs (SLMs) and liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS). Inspired by the new models for tAD function, we decided to revisit the tAD of the haematopoietic transcription factor c-Myb by performing a mutational analysis to see how these new models fit and potentially explain the tAD behaviour of this master regulator. We know that c-Myb has an acidic tAD, which contains a well-characterized SLM in the form of a LxxLL motif. By testing 12 alanine-scanning mutants and three mutants with major reorganization of its tAD in two mammalian reporter systems, we found a pattern of effects very close to what would be expected from the SLM-exposure model, with strong effects exerted by both acidic replacements and SLM mutation. When the same mutants were tested in a yeast system, the pattern of effects was dramatically different, with the SLM mutation exerting no effect, and tAD behaviour was much less affected by small alterations, as would be expected from a LLPS model. These observations are discussed in the light of the two new tAD models, and a two-step hypothesis for transactivation, combining both models, is proposed.

Functional information from clinically-derived drug resistant forms of the Candida glabrata Pdr1 transcription factor

Azole drugs are the most frequently used antifungal agents. The pathogenic yeast Candida glabrata acquires resistance to azole drugs via single amino acid substitution mutations eliciting a gain-of-function (GOF) hyperactive phenotype in the Pdr1 transcription factor. These GOF mutants constitutively drive high transcription of target genes such as the ATP-binding cassette transporter-encoding CDR1 locus. Previous characterization of Pdr1 has demonstrated that this factor is negatively controlled by the action of a central regulatory domain (CRD) of ~700 amino acids, in which GOF mutations are often found. Our earlier experiments demonstrated that a Pdr1 derivative in which the CRD was deleted gave rise to a transcriptional regulator that could not be maintained as the sole copy of PDR1 in the cell owing to its toxically high activity. Using a set of GOF PDR1 alleles from azole-resistant clinical isolates, we have analyzed the mechanisms acting to repress Pdr1 transcriptional activity. Our data support the view that Pdr1-dependent transactivation is mediated by a complex network of transcriptional coactivators interacting with the extreme C-terminal part of Pdr1. These coactivators include but are not limited to the Mediator component Med15A. Activity of this C-terminal domain is controlled by the CRD and requires multiple regions across the C-terminus for normal function. We also provide genetic evidence for an element within the transactivation domain that mediates the interaction of Pdr1 with coactivators on one hand while restricting Pdr1 activity on the other hand. These data indicate that GOF mutations in PDR1 block nonidentical negative inputs that would otherwise restrain Pdr1 transcriptional activation. The strong C-terminal transactivation domain of Pdr1 uses multiple different protein regions to recruit coactivators.

Resistance to antibiotics is a major threat to the continued use of these lifesaving chemotherapeutic drugs. This problem is especially acute in the case of antifungal drugs as only 3 classes of these compounds exist. The pathogenic yeast Candida glabrata acquires resistance to the azole class of antifungal drugs by developing hyperactive alleles of the PDR1 gene, encoding a major inducer of azole resistance. We provide evidence that these hyperactive mutant proteins identify different negative inputs that would otherwise repress the transcriptional activity of Pdr1. Mutational analysis of the extreme C-terminus of Pdr1 indicated that this region exhibited multiple different interactions with coactivator proteins required for normal transcriptional activation of target gene expression. The data reported here shed light on the complicated nature of regulation of Pdr1 activity and identify domains in this protein that are bifunctional in their role to ensure normal factor activity. A detailed understanding of the molecular control of Pdr1 will allow strategies to be devised to reverse the azole resistance triggered by mutant forms of this protein.

Multivalent and Bidirectional Binding of Transcriptional Transactivation Domains to the MED25 Coactivator

The human mediator subunit MED25 acts as a coactivator that binds the transcriptional activation domains (TADs) present in various cellular and viral gene-specific transcription factors. Previous studies, including on NMR measurements and site-directed mutagenesis, have only yielded low-resolution models that are difficult to refine further by experimental means. Here, we apply computational molecular dynamics simulations to study the interactions of two different TADs from the human transcription factor ETV5 (ERM) and herpes virus VP16-H1 with MED25. Like other well-studied coactivator-TAD complexes, the interactions of these intrinsically disordered domains with the coactivator surface are temporary and highly dynamic (‘fuzzy’). Due to the fact that the MED25 TAD-binding region is organized as an elongated cleft, we specifically asked whether these TADs are capable of binding in either orientation and how this could be achieved structurally and energetically. The binding of both the ETV5 and VP16-TADs in either orientation appears to be possible but occurs in a conformationally distinct manner and utilizes different sets of hydrophobic residues present in the TADs to drive the interactions. We propose that MED25 and at least a subset of human TADs specifically evolved a redundant set of molecular interaction patterns to allow binding to particular coactivators without major prior spatial constraints.

Interactions by Disorder - A Matter of Context

Living organisms depend on timely and organized interactions between proteins linked in interactomes of high complexity. The recent increased precision by which protein interactions can be studied, and the enclosure of intrinsic structural disorder, suggest that it is time to zoom out and embrace protein interactions beyond the most central points of physical encounter. The present paper discusses protein-protein interactions in the view of structural disorder with an emphasis on flanking regions and contexts of disorder-based interactions. Context constitutes an overarching concept being of physicochemical, biomolecular, and physiological nature, but it also includes the immediate molecular context of the interaction. For intrinsically disordered proteins, which often function by exploiting short linear motifs, context contributes in highly regulatory and decisive manners and constitute a yet largely unrecognized source of interaction potential in a multitude of biological processes. Through selected examples, this review emphasizes how multivalency, charges and charge clusters, hydrophobic patches, dynamics, energetic frustration, and ensemble redistribution of flanking regions or disordered contexts are emerging as important contributors to allosteric regulation, positive and negative cooperativity, feedback regulation and negative selection in binding. The review emphasizes that understanding context, and in particular the role the molecular disordered context and flanking regions take on in protein interactions, constitute an untapped well of energetic modulation potential, also of relevance to drug discovery and development.

A High-Throughput Screen for Transcription Activation Domains Reveals Their Sequence Features and Permits Prediction by Deep Learning

Acidic transcription activation domains (ADs) are encoded by a wide range of seemingly unrelated amino acid sequences, making it difficult to recognize features that promote their dynamic behavior, "fuzzy" interactions, and target specificity. We screened a large set of random 30-mer peptides for AD function in yeast and trained a deep neural network (ADpred) on the AD-positive and -negative sequences. ADpred identifies known acidic ADs within transcription factors and accurately predicts the consequences of mutations. Our work reveals that strong acidic ADs contain multiple clusters of hydrophobic residues near acidic side chains, explaining why ADs often have a biased amino acid composition. ADs likely use a binding mechanism similar to avidity where a minimum number of weak dynamic interactions are required between activator and target to generate biologically relevant affinity and in vivo function. This mechanism explains the basis for fuzzy binding observed between acidic ADs and targets.

The evolution of the 9aaTAD domain in Sp2 proteins: inactivation with valines and intron reservoirs

The universal nine-amino-acid transactivation domains (9aaTADs) have been identified in numerous transcription activators. Here, we identified the conserved 9aaTAD motif in all nine members of the specificity protein (SP) family. Previously, the Sp1 transcription factor has been defined as a glutamine-rich activator. We showed by amino acid substitutions that the glutamine residues are completely dispensable for 9aaTAD function and are not conserved in the SP family. We described the origin and evolutionary history of 9aaTADs. The 9aaTADs of the ancestral Sp2 gene became inactivated in early chordates. We next discovered that an accumulation of valines in 9aaTADs inactivated their transactivation function and enabled their strict conservation during evolution. Subsequently, in chordates, Sp2 has duplicated and created new paralogs, Sp1, Sp3, and Sp4 (the SP1-4 clade). During chordate evolution, the dormancy of the Sp2 activation domain lasted over 100 million years. The dormant but still intact ancestral Sp2 activation domains allowed diversification of the SP1-4 clade into activators and repressors. By valine substitution in the 9aaTADs, Sp1 and Sp3 regained their original activator function found in ancestral lower metazoan sea sponges. Therefore, the vertebrate SP1-4 clade could include both repressors and activators. Furthermore, we identified secondary 9aaTADs in Sp2 introns present from fish to primates, including humans. In the gibbon genome, introns containing 9aaTADs were used as exons, which turned the Sp2 gene into an activator. Similarly, we identified introns containing 9aaTADs used conditionally as exons in the (SP family-unrelated) transcription factor SREBP1, suggesting that the intron-9aaTAD reservoir is a general phenomenon.

The Polymorphic PolyQ Tail Protein of the Mediator Complex, Med15, Regulates the Variable Response to Diverse Stresses

The Mediator is composed of multiple subunits conserved from yeast to humans and plays a central role in transcription. The tail components are not required for basal transcription but are required for responses to different stresses. While some stresses are familiar, such as heat, desiccation, and starvation, others are exotic, yet yeast can elicit a successful stress response. 4-Methylcyclohexane methanol (MCHM) is a hydrotrope that induces growth arrest in yeast. We found that a naturally occurring variation in the Med15 allele, a component of the Mediator tail, altered the stress response to many chemicals in addition to MCHM. Med15 contains two polyglutamine repeats (polyQ) of variable lengths that change the gene expression of diverse pathways. The Med15 protein existed in multiple isoforms and its stability was dependent on Ydj1, a protein chaperone. The protein level of Med15 with longer polyQ tracts was lower and turned over faster than the allele with shorter polyQ repeats. MCHM sensitivity via variation of Med15 was regulated by Snf1 in a Myc-tag-dependent manner. Tagging Med15 with Myc altered its function in response to stress. Genetic variation in transcriptional regulators magnified genetic differences in response to environmental changes. These polymorphic control genes were master variators.

The Role of Transcription Factors and Nuclear Pore Proteins in Controlling the Spatial Organization of the Yeast Genome

Loss of nuclear pore complex (NPC) proteins, transcription factors (TFs), histone modification enzymes, Mediator, and factors involved in mRNA export disrupts the physical interaction of chromosomal sites with NPCs. Conditional inactivation and ectopic tethering experiments support a direct role for the TFs Gcn4 and Nup2 in mediating interaction with the NPC but suggest an indirect role for factors involved in mRNA export or transcription. A conserved "positioning domain" within Gcn4 controls interaction with the NPC and inter-chromosomal clustering and promotes transcription of target genes. Such a function may be quite common; a comprehensive screen reveals that tethering of most yeast TFs is sufficient to promote targeting to the NPC. While some TFs require Nup100, others do not, suggesting two distinct targeting mechanisms. These results highlight an important and underappreciated function of TFs in controlling the spatial organization of the yeast genome through interaction with the NPC.

Gcn4-Mediator Specificity Is Mediated by a Large and Dynamic Fuzzy Protein-Protein Complex

Transcription activation domains (ADs) are inherently disordered proteins that often target multiple coactivator complexes, but the specificity of these interactions is not understood. Efficient transcription activation by yeast Gcn4 requires its tandem ADs and four activator-binding domains (ABDs) on its target, the Mediator subunit Med15. Multiple ABDs are a common feature of coactivator complexes. We find that the large Gcn4-Med15 complex is heterogeneous and contains nearly all possible AD-ABD interactions. Gcn4-Med15 forms via a dynamic fuzzy protein-protein interface, where ADs bind the ABDs in multiple orientations via hydrophobic regions that gain helicity. This combinatorial mechanism allows individual low-affinity and specificity interactions to generate a biologically functional, specific, and higher affinity complex despite lacking a defined protein-protein interface. This binding strategy is likely representative of many activators that target multiple coactivators, as it allows great flexibility in combinations of activators that can cooperate to regulate genes with variable coactivator requirements.

Med15: Glutamine-Rich Mediator Subunit with Potential for Plasticity

The Mediator complex is required for basal activity of the RNA polymerase (Pol) II transcriptional apparatus and for responsiveness to some activator proteins. Med15, situated in the Mediator tail, plays a role in transmitting regulatory information from distant DNA-bound transcription factors to the transcriptional apparatus poised at promoters. Yeast Med15 and its orthologs share an unusual, glutamine-rich amino acid composition. Here, we discuss this sequence feature and the tendency of polyglutamine tracts to vary in length among strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and we propose that different polyglutamine tract lengths may be adaptive within certain domestication habitats.

Disordered domains in chromatin-binding proteins

Chromatin comprises proteins, DNA and RNA, and its function is to condense and package the genome in a way that allows the necessary transactions such as transcription, replication and repair to occur in a highly organised and regulated manner. The packaging of chromatin is often thought of in a hierarchical fashion starting from the most basic unit of DNA packaging, the nucleosome, to the condensation of nucleosomal 'beads on a string' by linker histones to form the 30-nm fibre and eventually large chromatin domains. However, a picture of a more heterogeneous, dynamic and liquid-like assembly is emerging, in which intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) and proteins containing intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) play a central role. Disorder features at all levels of chromatin organisation, from the histone tails, which are sites of extensive post-translational modification (PTM) that change the fate of the underlying genomic information, right through to transcription hubs, and the recently elucidated roles of IDPs and IDRs in the condensation of large regions of the genome through liquid-liquid phase separation.

Transcriptional activation is weakened when Taf1p N-terminal domain 1 is substituted with its Drosophila counterpart in yeast TFIID

Transcription factor II D (TFIID), a multiprotein complex consisting of TATA-binding protein (TBP) and 13-14 TBP-associated factors (Tafs), plays a central role in transcription and regulates nearly all class II genes. The N-terminal domain of Taf1p (TAND) can be divided into two subdomains, TAND1 and TAND2, which bind to the concave and convex surfaces of TBP, respectively. The interaction between TAND and TBP is thought to be regulated by TFIIA, activators and/or DNA during transcriptional activation, as the TAND1-bound form of TBP cannot bind to the TATA box. We previously demonstrated that Drosophila TAND1 binds to TBP with a much stronger affinity than yeast TAND1 and that the expression levels of full-length chimeric Taf1p, whose TAND1 is replaced with the Drosophila counterpart, can be varied in vivo by substituting several methionine residues downstream of TAND2 with alanine residues in various combinations. In this study, we examined the transcriptional activation of the GAL1-lacZ reporter or endogenous genes such as RNR3 or GAL1 in yeast cells expressing various levels of full-length chimeric Taf1p. The results showed that the substitution of TAND1 with the Drosophila counterpart in yeast TFIID weakened the transcriptional activation of GAL1-lacZ and RNR3 but not that of GAL1. These findings strongly support a model in which TBP must be released efficiently from TAND1 within TFIID upon transcriptional activation.