Conservation of a portion of the S. cerevisiae Ure2p prion domain that interacts with the full-length protein

Anti-Prion Systems in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

[PSI+] is a prion (infectious protein) of Sup35p, a subunit of the translation termination factor, and [URE3] is a prion of Ure2p, a mediator of nitrogen catabolite repression. Here, we trace the history of these prions and describe the array of anti-prion systems in S. cerevisiae. These systems work together to block prion infection, prion generation, prion propagation, prion segregation, and the lethal (and near-lethal) effects of most variants of these prions. Each system lowers the appearance of prions 2- to 15-fold, but together, ribosome-associated chaperones, the Hsp104 disaggregase, and the Sup35p-binding Upf proteins lower the frequency of [PSI+] appearance by ~5000-fold. [PSI+] variants can be categorized by their sensitivity to the various anti-prion systems, with the majority of prion isolates sensitive to all three of the above-mentioned systems. Yeast prions have been used to screen for human anti-prion proteins, and five of the Bag protein family members each have such activity. We suggest that manipulation of human anti-prion systems may be useful in preventing or treating some of the many human amyloidoses currently found to be prions with the same amyloid architecture as the yeast prions.

Anti-Prion Systems in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Turn an Avalanche of Prions into a Flurry

Prions are infectious proteins, mostly having a self-propagating amyloid (filamentous protein polymer) structure consisting of an abnormal form of a normally soluble protein. These prions arise spontaneously in the cell without known reason, and their effects were generally considered to be fatal based on prion diseases in humans or mammals. However, the wide array of prion studies in yeast including filamentous fungi revealed that their effects can range widely, from lethal to very mild (even cryptic) or functional, depending on the nature of the prion protein and the specific prion variant (or strain) made by the same prion protein but with a different conformation. This prion biology is affected by an array of molecular chaperone systems, such as Hsp40, Hsp70, Hsp104, and combinations of them. In parallel with the systems required for prion propagation, yeast has multiple anti-prion systems, constantly working in the normal cell without overproduction of or a deficiency in any protein, which have negative effects on prions by blocking their formation, curing many prions after they arise, preventing prion infections, and reducing the cytotoxicity produced by prions. From the protectors of nascent polypeptides (Ssb1/2p, Zuo1p, and Ssz1p) to the protein sequesterase (Btn2p), the disaggregator (Hsp104), and the mysterious Cur1p, normal levels of each can cure the prion variants arising in its absence. The controllers of mRNA quality, nonsense-mediated mRNA decay proteins (Upf1, 2, 3), can cure newly formed prion variants by association with a prion-forming protein. The regulator of the inositol pyrophosphate metabolic pathway (Siw14p) cures certain prion variants by lowering the levels of certain organic compounds. Some of these proteins have other cellular functions (e.g., Btn2), while others produce an anti-prion effect through their primary role in the normal cell (e.g., ribosomal chaperones). Thus, these anti-prion actions are the innate defense strategy against prions. Here, we outline the anti-prion systems in yeast that produce innate immunity to prions by a multi-layered operation targeting each step of prion development.

Innate immunity to prions: anti-prion systems turn a tsunami of prions into a slow drip

The yeast prions (infectious proteins) [URE3] and [PSI+] are essentially non-functional (or even toxic) amyloid forms of Ure2p and Sup35p, whose normal function is in nitrogen catabolite repression and translation termination, respectively. Yeast has an array of systems working in normal cells that largely block infection with prions, block most prion formation, cure most nascent prions and mitigate the toxic effects of those prions that escape the first three types of systems. Here we review recent progress in defining these anti-prion systems, how they work and how they are regulated. Polymorphisms of the prion domains partially block infection with prions. Ribosome-associated chaperones ensure proper folding of nascent proteins, thus reducing [PSI+] prion formation and curing many [PSI+] variants that do form. Btn2p is a sequestering protein which gathers [URE3] amyloid filaments to one place in the cells so that the prion is often lost by progeny cells. Proteasome impairment produces massive overexpression of Btn2p and paralog Cur1p, resulting in [URE3] curing. Inversely, increased proteasome activity, by derepression of proteasome component gene transcription or by 60S ribosomal subunit gene mutation, prevents prion curing by Btn2p or Cur1p. The nonsense-mediated decay proteins (Upf1,2,3) cure many nascent [PSI+] variants by associating with Sup35p directly. Normal levels of the disaggregating chaperone Hsp104 can also cure many [PSI+] prion variants. By keeping the cellular levels of certain inositol polyphosphates / pyrophosphates low, Siw14p cures certain [PSI+] variants. It is hoped that exploration of the yeast innate immunity to prions will lead to discovery of similar systems in humans.

Proteasome Control of [URE3] Prion Propagation by Degradation of Anti-Prion Proteins Cur1 and Btn2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

[URE3] is a prion of the nitrogen catabolism controller, Ure2p, and [PSI+] is a prion of the translation termination factor Sup35p in S. cerevisiae. Btn2p cures [URE3] by sequestration of Ure2p amyloid filaments. Cur1p, paralogous to Btn2p, also cures [URE3], but by a different (unknown) mechanism. We find that an array of mutations impairing proteasome assembly or MG132 inhibition of proteasome activity result in loss of [URE3]. In proportion to their prion-curing effects, each mutation affecting proteasomes elevates the cellular concentration of the anti-prion proteins Btn2 and Cur1. Of >4,600 proteins detected by SILAC, Btn2p was easily the most overexpressed in a pre9Δ (α3 core subunit) strain. Indeed, deletion of BTN2 and CUR1 prevents the prion-curing effects of proteasome impairment. Surprisingly, the 15 most unstable yeast proteins are not increased in pre9Δ cells suggesting altered proteasome specificity rather than simple inactivation. Hsp42, a chaperone that cooperates with Btn2 and Cur1 in curing [URE3], is also necessary for the curing produced by proteasome defects, although Hsp42p levels are not substantially altered by a proteasome defect. We find that pre9Δ and proteasome chaperone mutants that most efficiently lose [URE3], do not destabilize [PSI+] or alter cellular levels of Sup35p. A tof2 mutation or deletion likewise destabilizes [URE3], and elevates Btn2p, suggesting that Tof2p deficiency inactivates proteasomes. We suggest that when proteasomes are saturated with denatured/misfolded proteins, their reduced degradation of Btn2p and Cur1p automatically upregulates these aggregate-handling systems to assist in the clean-up.

Effect of spin labelling on the aggregation kinetics of yeast prion protein Ure2

Amyloid formation is involved in a wide range of neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer's and prion diseases. Structural understanding of the amyloid is critical to delineate the mechanism of aggregation and its pathological spreading. Site-directed spin labelling has emerged as a powerful structural tool in the studies of amyloid structures and provided structural evidence for the parallel in-register β-sheet structure for a wide range of amyloid proteins. It is generally accepted that spin labelling does not disrupt the structure of the amyloid fibrils, the end product of protein aggregation. The effect on the rate of protein aggregation, however, has not been well characterized. Here, we employed a scanning mutagenesis approach to study the effect of spin labelling on the aggregation rate of 79 spin-labelled variants of the Ure2 prion domain. The aggregation of Ure2 protein is the basis of yeast prion [URE3]. We found that all spin-labelled Ure2 mutants aggregated within the experimental timeframe of 15 to 40 h. Among the 79 spin-labelled positions, only five residue sites (N23, N27, S33, I35 and G42) showed a dramatic delay in the aggregation rate as a result of spin labelling. These positions may be important for fibril nucleation, a rate-limiting step in aggregation. Importantly, spin labelling at most of the sites had a muted effect on Ure2 aggregation kinetics, showing a general tolerance of spin labelling in protein aggregation studies.

Innate immunity to yeast prions: Btn2p and Cur1p curing of the [URE3] prion is prevented by 60S ribosomal protein deficiency or ubiquitin/proteasome system overactivity

[URE3] is an amyloid-based prion of Ure2p, a negative regulator of poor nitrogen source catabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Overproduced Btn2p or its paralog Cur1p, in processes requiring Hsp42, cure the [URE3] prion. Btn2p cures by collecting Ure2p amyloid filaments at one place in the cell. We find that rpl4aΔ, rpl21aΔ, rpl21bΔ, rpl11bΔ, and rpl16bΔ (large ribosomal subunit proteins) or ubr2Δ (ubiquitin ligase targeting Rpn4p, an activator of proteasome genes) reduce curing by overproduced Btn2p or Cur1p. Impaired curing in ubr2Δ or rpl21bΔ is restored by an rpn4Δ mutation. No effect of rps14aΔ or rps30bΔ on curing was observed, indicating that 60S subunit deficiency specifically impairs curing. Levels of Hsp42p, Sis1p, or Btn3p are unchanged in rpl4aΔ, rpl21bΔ, or ubr2Δ mutants. Overproduction of Cur1p or Btn2p was enhanced in rpn4Δ and hsp42Δ mutants, lower in ubr2Δ strains, and restored to above wild-type levels in rpn4Δ ubr2Δ strains. As in the wild-type, Ure2N-GFP colocalizes with Btn2-RFP in rpl4aΔ, rpl21bΔ, or ubr2Δ strains, but not in hsp42Δ. Btn2p/Cur1p overproduction cures [URE3] variants with low seed number, but seed number is not increased in rpl4aΔ, rpl21bΔ or ubr2Δ mutants. Knockouts of genes required for the protein sorting function of Btn2p did not affect curing of [URE3], nor did inactivation of the Hsp104 prion-curing activity. Overactivity of the ubiquitin/proteasome system, resulting from 60S subunit deficiency or ubr2Δ, may impair Cur1p and Btn2p curing of [URE3] by degrading Cur1p, Btn2p or another component of these curing systems.

Spin Label Scanning Reveals Likely Locations of β-Strands in the Amyloid Fibrils of the Ure2 Prion Domain

In yeast, the formation of Ure2 fibrils underlies the prion state [URE3], in which the yeast loses the ability to distinguish good nitrogen sources from bad ones. The Ure2 prion domain is both necessary and sufficient for the formation of amyloid fibrils. Understanding the structure of Ure2 fibrils is important for understanding the propagation not only of the [URE3] prion but also of other yeast prions whose prion domains share similar features, such as the enrichment of asparagine and glutamine residues. Here, we report a structural study of the amyloid fibrils formed by the Ure2 prion domain using site-directed spin labeling and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy. We completed a spin label scanning of all the residue positions between 2 and 80 of the Ure2 prion domain. The EPR data show that the Ure2 fibril core consists of residues 8-68 and adopts a parallel in-register β-sheet structure. Most of the residues show strong spin-exchange interactions, suggesting that there are only short turns and no long loops in the fibril core. Based on the strength of spin-exchange interactions, we determined the likely locations of the β-strands. EPR data also show that the C-terminal region of the Ure2 prion domain is more disordered than the N-terminal region. The roles of hydrophobic and charged residues are analyzed. Overall, the structure of Ure2 fibrils appears to involve a balance of stabilizing interactions, such as asparagine ladders, and destabilizing interactions, such as stacking of charged residues.

Nonsense Mutations in the Yeast SUP35 Gene Affect the [PSI+] Prion Propagation

The essential SUP35 gene encodes yeast translation termination factor eRF3. Previously, we isolated nonsense mutations sup35-n and proposed that the viability of such mutants can be explained by readthrough of the premature stop codon. Such mutations, as well as the prion [PSI+], can appear in natural yeast populations, and their combinations may have different effects on the cells. Here, we analyze the effects of the compatibility of sup35-n mutations with the [PSI+] prion in haploid and diploid cells. We demonstrated that sup35-n mutations are incompatible with the [PSI+] prion, leading to lethality of sup35-n [PSI+] haploid cells. In diploid cells the compatibility of [PSI+] with sup35-n depends on how the corresponding diploid was obtained. Nonsense mutations sup35-21, sup35-74, and sup35-218 are compatible with the [PSI+] prion in diploid strains, but affect [PSI+] properties and lead to the formation of new prion variant. The only mutation that could replace the SUP35 wild-type allele in both haploid and diploid [PSI+] strains, sup35-240, led to the prion loss. Possibly, short Sup351-55 protein, produced from the sup35-240 allele, is included in Sup35 aggregates and destabilize them. Alternatively, single molecules of Sup351-55 can stick to aggregate ends, and thus interrupt the fibril growth. Thus, we can conclude that sup35-240 mutation prevents [PSI+] propagation and can be considered as a new pnm mutation.

Anti-Prion Systems in Yeast and Inositol Polyphosphates

The amyloid-based yeast prions are folded in-register parallel β-sheet polymers. Each prion can exist in a wide array of variants, with different biological properties resulting from different self-propagating amyloid conformations. Yeast has several anti-prion systems, acting in normal cells (without protein overexpression or deficiency). Some anti-prion proteins partially block prion formation (Ssb1,2p, ribosome-associated Hsp70s); others cure a large portion of prion variants that arise [Btn2p, Cur1p, Hsp104 (a disaggregase), Siw14p, and Upf1,2,3p, nonsense-mediated decay proteins], and others prevent prion-induced pathology (Sis1p, essential cytoplasmic Hsp40). Study of the anti-prion activity of Siw14p, a pyrophosphatase specific for 5-diphosphoinositol pentakisphosphate (5PP-IP5), led to the discovery that inositol polyphosphates, signal transduction molecules, are involved in [PSI+] prion propagation. Either inositol hexakisphosphate or 5PP-IP4 (or 5PP-IP5) can supply a function that is needed by nearly all [PSI+] variants. Because yeast prions are informative models for mammalian prion diseases and other amyloidoses, detailed examination of the anti-prion systems, some of which have close mammalian homologues, will be important for the development of therapeutic measures.

Study of Amyloids Using Yeast

We detail some of the genetic, biochemical, and physical methods useful in studying amyloids in yeast, particularly the yeast prions. These methods include cytoduction (cytoplasmic mixing), infection of cells with prion amyloids, use of green fluorescent protein fusions with amyloid-forming proteins for cytology, protein purification and amyloid formation, and electron microscopy of filaments.

Yeast and Fungal Prions

Yeast and fungal prions are infectious proteins, most being self-propagating amyloids of normally soluble proteins. Their effects range from a very mild detriment to lethal, with specific effects dependent on the prion protein and the specific prion variant ("prion strain"). The prion amyloids of Sup35p, Ure2p, and Rnq1p are in-register, parallel, folded β-sheets, an architecture that naturally suggests a mechanism by which a protein can template its conformation, just as DNA or RNA templates its sequence. Prion propagation is critically affected by an array of chaperone systems, most notably the Hsp104/Hsp70/Hsp40 combination, which is responsible for generating new prion seeds from old filaments. The Btn2/Cur1 antiprion system cures most [URE3] prions that develop, and the Ssb antiprion system blocks [PSI+] generation.

Repeats are one of the main characteristics of RNA-binding proteins with prion-like domains

It is not surprising that a large number of diseases related to amyloid fibril depositions are formed in various organs. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the transformation of native proteins into amyloid fibrils in order to clarify which key elements of this process determine the pathway of protein misfolding. Significant attention has been directed recently to investigating the mechanism of formation of cross-β structures that have the properties of liquids but can also exist in gel-like forms, thus facilitating the retention of both RNAs and RNA-binding proteins. Proteins that form stress granules are believed to do this rapidly, and they are expected to contain a prion-like domain that can facilitate this process. By analyzing the known yeast prion proteins and 29 RNA-binding proteins with prion-like domains, we demonstrate here that the existence of repeats is one of the general characteristics of prion-like domains. The presence of repeats should help to determine the border of prion domains as in the case of Rnq1: five found repeats shift the border of the prion domain from the 153-rd to at least the 133-th residue. One can suggest that such repeats assist in the rapid initiation of the process of assembly and formation of cross-β structures and such domains most likely should be disordered. These repeats should contain aromatic amino acid residues for the formation of a hydrogel because its amino acid context modulates the strength of interaction. The key factors determined here can be used to control the process of aggregation to prevent the development of pathologies and diseases caused by prion-like domains.

Prions are affected by evolution at two levels

Prions, infectious proteins, can transmit diseases or be the basis of heritable traits (or both), mostly based on amyloid forms of the prion protein. A single protein sequence can be the basis for many prion strains/variants, with different biological properties based on different amyloid conformations, each rather stably propagating. Prions are unique in that evolution and selection work at both the level of the chromosomal gene encoding the protein, and on the prion itself selecting prion variants. Here, we summarize what is known about the evolution of prion proteins, both the genes and the prions themselves. We contrast the one known functional prion, [Het-s] of Podospora anserina, with the known disease prions, the yeast prions [PSI+] and [URE3] and the transmissible spongiform encephalopathies of mammals.

Yeast and Fungal Prions: Amyloid-Handling Systems, Amyloid Structure, and Prion Biology

Yeast prions (infectious proteins) were discovered by their outré genetic properties and have become important models for an array of human prion and amyloid diseases. A single prion protein can become any of many distinct amyloid forms (called prion variants or strains), each of which is self-propagating, but with different biological properties (eg, lethal vs mild). The folded in-register parallel β sheet architecture of the yeast prion amyloids naturally suggests a mechanism by which prion variant information can be faithfully transmitted for many generations. The yeast prions rely on cellular chaperones for their propagation, but can be cured by various chaperone imbalances. The Btn2/Cur1 system normally cures most variants of the [URE3] prion that arise. Although most variants of the [PSI+] and [URE3] prions are toxic or lethal, some are mild in their effects. Even the most mild forms of these prions are rare in the wild, indicating that they too are detrimental to yeast. The beneficial [Het-s] prion of Podospora anserina poses an important contrast in its structure, biology, and evolution to the yeast prions characterized thus far.

Proteins with Intrinsically Disordered Domains Are Preferentially Recruited to Polyglutamine Aggregates

Intracellular protein aggregation is the hallmark of several neurodegenerative diseases. Aggregates formed by polyglutamine (polyQ)-expanded proteins, such as Huntingtin, adopt amyloid-like structures that are resistant to denaturation. We used a novel purification strategy to isolate aggregates formed by human Huntingtin N-terminal fragments with expanded polyQ tracts from both yeast and mammalian (PC-12) cells. Using mass spectrometry we identified the protein species that are trapped within these polyQ aggregates. We found that proteins with very long intrinsically-disordered (ID) domains (≥100 amino acids) and RNA-binding proteins were disproportionately recruited into aggregates. The removal of the ID domains from selected proteins was sufficient to eliminate their recruitment into polyQ aggregates. We also observed that several neurodegenerative disease-linked proteins were reproducibly trapped within the polyQ aggregates purified from mammalian cells. Many of these proteins have large ID domains and are found in neuronal inclusions in their respective diseases. Our study indicates that neurodegenerative disease-associated proteins are particularly vulnerable to recruitment into polyQ aggregates via their ID domains. Also, the high frequency of ID domains in RNA-binding proteins may explain why RNA-binding proteins are frequently found in pathological inclusions in various neurodegenerative diseases.

Yeast prions: structure, biology, and prion-handling systems

A prion is an infectious protein horizontally transmitting a disease or trait without a required nucleic acid. Yeast and fungal prions are nonchromosomal genes composed of protein, generally an altered form of a protein that catalyzes the same alteration of the protein. Yeast prions are thus transmitted both vertically (as genes composed of protein) and horizontally (as infectious proteins, or prions). Formation of amyloids (linear ordered β-sheet-rich protein aggregates with β-strands perpendicular to the long axis of the filament) underlies most yeast and fungal prions, and a single prion protein can have any of several distinct self-propagating amyloid forms with different biological properties (prion variants). Here we review the mechanism of faithful templating of protein conformation, the biological roles of these prions, and their interactions with cellular chaperones, the Btn2 and Cur1 aggregate-handling systems, and other cellular factors governing prion generation and propagation. Human amyloidoses include the PrP-based prion conditions and many other, more common amyloid-based diseases, several of which show prion-like features. Yeast prions increasingly are serving as models for the understanding and treatment of many mammalian amyloidoses. Patients with different clinical pictures of the same amyloidosis may be the equivalent of yeasts with different prion variants.

Amyloid diseases of yeast: prions are proteins acting as genes

The unusual genetic properties of the non-chromosomal genetic elements [URE3] and [PSI+] led to them being identified as prions (infectious proteins) of Ure2p and Sup35p respectively. Ure2p and Sup35p, and now several other proteins, can form amyloid, a linear ordered polymer of protein monomers, with a part of each molecule, the prion domain, forming the core of this β-sheet structure. Amyloid filaments passed to a new cell seed the conversion of the normal form of the protein into the same amyloid form. The cell's phenotype is affected, usually from the deficiency of the normal form of the protein. Solid-state NMR studies indicate that the yeast prion amyloids are in-register parallel β-sheet structures, in which each residue (e.g. Asn35) forms a row along the filament long axis. The favourable interactions possible for aligned identical hydrophilic and hydrophobic residues are believed to be the mechanism for propagation of amyloid conformation. Thus, just as DNA mediates inheritance by templating its own sequence, these proteins act as genes by templating their conformation. Distinct isolates of a given prion have different biological properties, presumably determined by differences between the amyloid structures. Many lines of evidence indicate that the Saccharomyces cerevisiae prions are pathological disease agents, although the example of the [Het-s] prion of Podospora anserina shows that a prion can have beneficial aspects.

Yeast prions: structure, biology, and prion-handling systems

A prion is an infectious protein horizontally transmitting a disease or trait without a required nucleic acid. Yeast and fungal prions are nonchromosomal genes composed of protein, generally an altered form of a protein that catalyzes the same alteration of the protein. Yeast prions are thus transmitted both vertically (as genes composed of protein) and horizontally (as infectious proteins, or prions). Formation of amyloids (linear ordered β-sheet-rich protein aggregates with β-strands perpendicular to the long axis of the filament) underlies most yeast and fungal prions, and a single prion protein can have any of several distinct self-propagating amyloid forms with different biological properties (prion variants). Here we review the mechanism of faithful templating of protein conformation, the biological roles of these prions, and their interactions with cellular chaperones, the Btn2 and Cur1 aggregate-handling systems, and other cellular factors governing prion generation and propagation. Human amyloidoses include the PrP-based prion conditions and many other, more common amyloid-based diseases, several of which show prion-like features. Yeast prions increasingly are serving as models for the understanding and treatment of many mammalian amyloidoses. Patients with different clinical pictures of the same amyloidosis may be the equivalent of yeasts with different prion variants.

Sporadic distribution of prion-forming ability of Sup35p from yeasts and fungi

Sup35p of Saccharomyces cerevisiae can form the [PSI+] prion, an infectious amyloid in which the protein is largely inactive. The part of Sup35p that forms the amyloid is the region normally involved in control of mRNA turnover. The formation of [PSI+] by Sup35p's from other yeasts has been interpreted to imply that the prion-forming ability of Sup35p is conserved in evolution, and thus of survival/fitness/evolutionary value to these organisms. We surveyed a larger number of yeast and fungal species by the same criteria as used previously and find that the Sup35p from many species cannot form prions. [PSI+] could be formed by the Sup35p from Candida albicans, Candida maltosa, Debaromyces hansenii, and Kluyveromyces lactis, but orders of magnitude less often than the S. cerevisiae Sup35p converts to the prion form. The Sup35s from Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Ashbya gossypii clearly do not form [PSI+]. We were also unable to detect [PSI+] formation by the Sup35ps from Aspergillus nidulans, Aspergillus fumigatus, Magnaporthe grisea, Ustilago maydis, or Cryptococcus neoformans. Each of two C. albicans SUP35 alleles can form [PSI+], but transmission from one to the other is partially blocked. These results suggest that the prion-forming ability of Sup35p is not a conserved trait, but is an occasional deleterious side effect of a protein domain conserved for another function.

Ploidy controls [URE3] prion propagation in yeast

Previous genetic approaches have enabled the identification of key partners for prion propagation in yeast, such as HSP104. All the experiments performed thus far have been conducted in a haploid context. In this study, we used a diploid yeast strain to identify genes that interfere with [URE3] stability. Our screen, based on a multi-copy library, revealed an unsuspected role for centromeric sequences that appear to decrease the mitotic stability of this prion. Because an increase in centromeric sequences interferes with [URE3] transmission, we analyzed this property in tetraploid yeast cells. We found that in such strains, [URE3] is quite unstable, with the concentration of Hsp104p being a key factor for the stabilization of [URE3] in 4n yeast cells. We also showed that HSP104 stabilization can occur independently of its 'disaggregate' activity. These results may explain the discrepancy between wild strains bearing or not bearing prions because they differ in their ploidy. These results provide new insight into prion biology by linking the control of ploidy to protein misfolding and demonstrate that [URE3] is also a gain-of-function phenotype.

The story of stolen chaperones: how overexpression of Q/N proteins cures yeast prions

Prions are self-seeding alternate protein conformations. Most yeast prions contain glutamine/asparagine (Q/N)-rich domains that promote the formation of amyloid-like prion aggregates. Chaperones, including Hsp104 and Sis1, are required to continually break these aggregates into smaller “seeds.” Decreasing aggregate size and increasing the number of growing aggregate ends facilitates both aggregate transmission and growth. Our previous work showed that overexpression of 11 proteins with Q/N-rich domains facilitates the de novo aggregation of Sup35 into the [PSI⁺] prion, presumably by a cross-seeding mechanism. We now discuss our recent paper, in which we showed that overexpression of most of these same 11 Q/N-rich proteins, including Pin4C and Cyc8, destabilized pre-existing Q/N rich prions. Overexpression of both Pin4C and Cyc8 caused [PSI⁺] aggregates to enlarge. This is incompatible with a previously proposed “capping” model where the overexpressed Q/N-rich protein poisons, or “caps,” the growing aggregate ends. Rather the data match what is expected of a reduction in prion severing by chaperones. Indeed, while Pin4C overexpression does not alter chaperone levels, Pin4C aggregates sequester chaperones away from the prion aggregates. Cyc8 overexpression cures [PSI⁺] by inducing an increase in Hsp104 levels, as excess Hsp104 binds to [PSI⁺] aggregates in a way that blocks their shearing.

Amyloids and yeast prion biology

The prions (infectious proteins) of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are proteins acting as genes, by templating their conformation from one molecule to another in analogy to DNA templating its sequence. Most yeast prions are amyloid forms of normally soluble proteins, and a single protein sequence can have any of several self-propagating forms (called prion strains or variants), analogous to the different possible alleles of a DNA gene. A central issue in prion biology is the structural basis of this conformational templating process. The in-register parallel β sheet structure found for several infectious yeast prion amyloids naturally suggests an explanation for this conformational templating. While most prions are plainly diseases, the [Het-s] prion of Podospora anserina may be a functional amyloid, with important structural implications. Yeast prions are important models for human amyloid diseases in general, particularly because new evidence is showing infectious aspects of several human amyloidoses not previously classified as prions. We also review studies of the roles of chaperones, aggregate-collecting proteins, and other cellular components using yeast that have led the way in improving the understanding of similar processes that must be operating in many human amyloidoses.

The [URE3] prion in Candida

Ure2p, normally a regulator of nitrogen catabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, can be a prion (infectious protein) by forming a folded in-register parallel amyloid called [URE3]. Using S. cerevisiae as a test bed, we previously showed that Ure2p of Candida albicans (CaUre2p) can also form a prion, but that Ure2p of C. glabrata (CgUre2p) cannot. Here, we constructed C. glabrata strains to test whether CgUre2p can form a prion in its native environment. We find that while CaUre2p can form a [URE3] in C. glabrata, CgUre2p cannot, although the latter has a prion domain sequence more similar to that of ScUre2p than that of CaUre2p. This supports the notion that prion formation is not a conserved property of Ure2p but is a pathology arising sporadically. We find that some [URE3albicans] variants are restricted in their transmissibility to certain recipient strains. In addition, we show that the C. glabrata HO can induce switching of the C. glabrata mating type locus.

Heterologous gln/asn-rich proteins impede the propagation of yeast prions by altering chaperone availability

Prions are self-propagating conformations of proteins that can cause heritable phenotypic traits. Most yeast prions contain glutamine (Q)/asparagine (N)-rich domains that facilitate the accumulation of the protein into amyloid-like aggregates. Efficient transmission of these infectious aggregates to daughter cells requires that chaperones, including Hsp104 and Sis1, continually sever the aggregates into smaller “seeds.” We previously identified 11 proteins with Q/N-rich domains that, when overproduced, facilitate the de novo aggregation of the Sup35 protein into the [PSI⁺] prion state. Here, we show that overexpression of many of the same 11 Q/N-rich proteins can also destabilize pre-existing [PSI⁺] or [URE3] prions. We explore in detail the events leading to the loss (curing) of [PSI⁺] by the overexpression of one of these proteins, the Q/N-rich domain of Pin4, which causes Sup35 aggregates to increase in size and decrease in transmissibility to daughter cells. We show that the Pin4 Q/N-rich domain sequesters Hsp104 and Sis1 chaperones away from the diffuse cytoplasmic pool. Thus, a mechanism by which heterologous Q/N-rich proteins impair prion propagation appears to be the loss of cytoplasmic Hsp104 and Sis1 available to sever [PSI⁺].

Certain proteins can occasionally misfold into infectious aggregates called prions. Once formed, these aggregates grow by attracting the soluble form of that protein to join them. The presence of these aggregates can cause profound effects on cells and, in humans, can cause diseases such as transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs). In yeast, the aggregates are efficiently transmitted to daughter cells because they are cut into small pieces by molecular scissors (chaperones). Here we show that heritable prion aggregates are frequently lost when we overproduce certain other proteins with curing activity. We analyzed one such protein in detail and found that when it is overproduced it forms aggregates that sequester chaperones. This sequestration appears to block the ability of the chaperones to cut the prion aggregates. The result is that the prions get too large to be transmitted to daughter cells. Such sequestration of molecular scissors provides a potential approach to thwart the propagation of disease-causing infectious protein aggregates.

Prion domain of yeast Ure2 protein adopts a completely disordered structure: a solid-support EPR study

Amyloid fibril formation is associated with a range of neurodegenerative diseases in humans, including Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and prion diseases. In yeast, amyloid underlies several non-Mendelian phenotypes referred to as yeast prions. Mechanism of amyloid formation is critical for a complete understanding of the yeast prion phenomenon and human amyloid-related diseases. Ure2 protein is the basis of yeast prion [URE3]. The Ure2p prion domain is largely disordered. Residual structures, if any, in the disordered region may play an important role in the aggregation process. Studies of Ure2p prion domain are complicated by its high aggregation propensity, which results in a mixture of monomer and aggregates in solution. Previously we have developed a solid-support electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) approach to address this problem and have identified a structured state for the Alzheimer’s amyloid-β monomer. Here we use solid-support EPR to study the structure of Ure2p prion domain. EPR spectra of Ure2p prion domain with spin labels at every fifth residue from position 10 to position 75 show similar residue mobility profile for denaturing and native buffers after accounting for the effect of solution viscosity. These results suggest that Ure2p prion domain adopts a completely disordered structure in the native buffer. A completely disordered Ure2p prion domain implies that the amyloid formation of Ure2p, and likely other Q/N-rich yeast prion proteins, is primarily driven by inter-molecular interactions.

Prions in yeast

The concept of a prion as an infectious self-propagating protein isoform was initially proposed to explain certain mammalian diseases. It is now clear that yeast also has heritable elements transmitted via protein. Indeed, the "protein only" model of prion transmission was first proven using a yeast prion. Typically, known prions are ordered cross-β aggregates (amyloids). Recently, there has been an explosion in the number of recognized prions in yeast. Yeast continues to lead the way in understanding cellular control of prion propagation, prion structure, mechanisms of de novo prion formation, specificity of prion transmission, and the biological roles of prions. This review summarizes what has been learned from yeast prions.

Characterization of an Nmr homolog that modulates GATA factor-mediated nitrogen metabolite repression in Cryptococcus neoformans

Nitrogen source utilization plays a critical role in fungal development, secondary metabolite production and pathogenesis. In both the Ascomycota and Basidiomycota, GATA transcription factors globally activate the expression of catabolic enzyme-encoding genes required to degrade complex nitrogenous compounds. However, in the presence of preferred nitrogen sources such as ammonium, GATA factor activity is inhibited in some species through interaction with co-repressor Nmr proteins. This regulatory phenomenon, nitrogen metabolite repression, enables preferential utilization of readily assimilated nitrogen sources. In the basidiomycete pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans, the GATA factor Gat1/Are1 has been co-opted into regulating multiple key virulence traits in addition to nitrogen catabolism. Here, we further characterize Gat1/Are1 function and investigate the regulatory role of the predicted Nmr homolog Tar1. While GAT1/ARE1 expression is induced during nitrogen limitation, TAR1 transcription is unaffected by nitrogen availability. Deletion of TAR1 leads to inappropriate derepression of non-preferred nitrogen catabolic pathways in the simultaneous presence of favoured sources. In addition to exhibiting its evolutionary conserved role of inhibiting GATA factor activity under repressing conditions, Tar1 also positively regulates GAT1/ARE1 transcription under non-repressing conditions. The molecular mechanism by which Tar1 modulates nitrogen metabolite repression, however, remains open to speculation. Interaction between Tar1 and Gat1/Are1 was undetectable in a yeast two-hybrid assay, consistent with Tar1 and Gat1/Are1 each lacking the conserved C-terminus regions present in ascomycete Nmr proteins and GATA factors that are known to interact with each other. Importantly, both Tar1 and Gat1/Are1 are suppressors of C. neoformans virulence, reiterating and highlighting the paradigm of nitrogen regulation of pathogenesis.

The yeast prion protein Ure2: insights into the mechanism of amyloid formation

Ure2, a regulator of nitrogen metabolism, is the protein determinant of the [URE3] prion state in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Upon conversion into the prion form, Ure2 undergoes a heritable conformational change to an amyloid-like aggregated state and loses its regulatory function. A number of molecular chaperones have been found to affect the prion properties of Ure2. The studies carried out in our laboratory have been aimed at elucidating the structure of Ure2 fibrils, the mechanism of amyloid formation and the effect of chaperones on the fibril formation of Ure2.

Study of amyloids using yeast

We detail some of the genetic, biochemical, and physical methods useful in studying amyloids in yeast, particularly the yeast prions. These methods include cytoduction (cytoplasmic mixing), infection of cells with prion amyloids, use of green fluorescent protein fusions with amyloid-forming proteins for cytology, protein purification and amyloid formation, and electron microscopy of filaments.

The yeast prions [PSI+] and [URE3] are molecular degenerative diseases

The yeast prions [URE3] and [PSI] are not found in wild strains, suggesting they are not an advantage. Prion-forming ability is not conserved, even within Saccharomyces, suggesting it is a disease. Prion domains have non-prion functions, explaining some conservation of sequence. However, in spite of the sequence being constrained in evolution by these non-prion functions, the prion domains vary more rapidly than the remainder of the molecule, and these changes produce a transmission barrier, suggesting that these changes were selected to block prion infection. Yeast prions [PSI] and [URE3] induce a cellular stress response (Hsp104 and Hsp70 induction), suggesting the cells are not happy about being infected. Recently, we showed that the array of [PSI] and [URE3] prions includes a majority of lethal or very toxic variants, a result not expected if either prion were an adaptive cellular response to stress.

The yeast prions [PSI+] and [URE3] are molecular degenerative diseases

The yeast prions [URE3] and [PSI] are not found in wild strains, suggesting they are not an advantage. Prion-forming ability is not conserved, even within Saccharomyces, suggesting it is a disease. Prion domains have non-prion functions, explaining some conservation of sequence. However, in spite of the sequence being constrained in evolution by these non-prion functions, the prion domains vary more rapidly than the remainder of the molecule, and these changes produce a transmission barrier, suggesting that these changes were selected to block prion infection. Yeast prions [PSI] and [URE3] induce a cellular stress response (Hsp104 and Hsp70 induction), suggesting the cells are not happy about being infected. Recently, we showed that the array of [PSI] and [URE3] prions includes a majority of lethal or very toxic variants, a result not expected if either prion were an adaptive cellular response to stress.

Amyloid of the Candida albicans Ure2p prion domain is infectious and has an in-register parallel β-sheet structure

Ure2p of Candida albicans (Ure2(albicans) or CaUre2p) can be a prion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, but Ure2p of Candida glabrata (Ure2(glabrata)) cannot, even though the Ure2(glabrata) N-terminal domain is more similar to that of the S. cerevisiae Ure2p (Ure2(cerevisiae)) than Ure2(albicans) is. We show that the N-terminal N/Q-rich prion domain of Ure2(albicans) forms amyloid that is infectious, transmitting [URE3alb] to S. cerevisiae cells expressing only C. albicans Ure2p. Using solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance of selectively labeled C. albicans Ure2p(1-90), we show that this infectious amyloid has an in-register parallel β-sheet structure, like that of the S. cerevisiae Ure2p prion domain and other S. cerevisiae prion amyloids. In contrast, the N/Q-rich N-terminal domain of Ure2(glabrata) does not readily form amyloid, and that formed upon prolonged incubation is not infectious.

Sequence specificity and fidelity of prion transmission in yeast

Amyloid formation is a widespread feature of various proteins. It is associated with both important diseases (including infectious mammalian prions) and biologically positive functions, and provides a basis for structural "templating" and protein-based epigenetic inheritance (for example, in the case of yeast prions). Amyloid templating is characterized by a high level of sequence specificity and conformational fidelity. Even slight variations in sequence may produce a strong barrier for prion transmission. Yeast models provide useful insight into a mechanism of amyloid specificity and fidelity. Accumulating evidence indicates that cross-species prion transmission is controlled by the identity of short sequences (specificity stretches) rather than by the overall level of sequence identity. Location of the specificity stretches determines the location and/or size of the cross-β amyloid region that controls patterns of prion variants. In some cases of cross-species prion transmission, fidelity of variant reproduction is impaired, leading to the formation of new structural variants. We propose that such a variant switch may occur due to choice of the alternatively located secondary specificity stretches, when interaction between the primary stretches is impaired due to sequence divergence.

Prion-forming ability of Ure2 of yeasts is not evolutionarily conserved

[URE3] is a prion (infectious protein) of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ure2p, a regulator of nitrogen catabolism. We show that wild S. paradoxus can be infected with a [URE3] prion, supporting the use of S. cerevisiae as a prion test bed. We find that the Ure2p of Candida albicans and C. glabrata also regulate nitrogen catabolism. Conservation of amino acid sequence within the prion domain of Ure2p has been proposed as evidence that the [URE3] prion helps its host. We show that the C. albicans Ure2p, which does not conserve this sequence, can nonetheless form a [URE3] prion in S. cerevisiae, but the C. glabrata Ure2p, which does have the conserved sequence, cannot form [URE3] as judged by its performance in S. cerevisiae. These results suggest that the sequence is not conserved to preserve prion forming ability.

Prion diseases of yeast: amyloid structure and biology

Prion "variants" or "strains" are prions with the identical protein sequence, but different characteristics of the prion infection: e.g. different incubation periods for scrapie strains or different phenotype intensities for yeast prion variants. We have shown that infectious amyloids of the yeast prions [PSI+], [URE3] and [PIN+] each have an in-register parallel β-sheet architecture. Moreover, we have pointed out that this amyloid architecture can explain how one protein can faithfully transmit any of several conformations to new protein monomers. This explains how proteins can be genes.

Prion amyloid structure explains templating: how proteins can be genes

The yeast and fungal prions determine heritable and infectious traits, and are thus genes composed of protein. Most prions are inactive forms of a normal protein as it forms a self-propagating filamentous β-sheet-rich polymer structure called amyloid. Remarkably, a single prion protein sequence can form two or more faithfully inherited prion variants, in effect alleles of these genes. What protein structure explains this protein-based inheritance? Using solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance, we showed that the infectious amyloids of the prion domains of Ure2p, Sup35p and Rnq1p have an in-register parallel architecture. This structure explains how the amyloid filament ends can template the structure of a new protein as it joins the filament. The yeast prions [PSI(+)] and [URE3] are not found in wild strains, indicating that they are a disadvantage to the cell. Moreover, the prion domains of Ure2p and Sup35p have functions unrelated to prion formation, indicating that these domains are not present for the purpose of forming prions. Indeed, prion-forming ability is not conserved, even within Saccharomyces cerevisiae, suggesting that the rare formation of prions is a disease. The prion domain sequences generally vary more rapidly in evolution than does the remainder of the molecule, producing a barrier to prion transmission, perhaps selected in evolution by this protection.

Relationship between prion propensity and the rates of individual molecular steps of fibril assembly

Peptides and proteins possess an inherent propensity to self-assemble into generic fibrillar nanostructures known as amyloid fibrils, some of which are involved in medical conditions such as Alzheimer disease. In certain cases, such structures can self-propagate in living systems as prions and transmit characteristic traits to the host organism. The mechanisms that allow certain amyloid species but not others to function as prions are not fully understood. Much progress in understanding the prion phenomenon has been achieved through the study of prions in yeast as this system has proved to be experimentally highly tractable; but quantitative understanding of the biophysics and kinetics of the assembly process has remained challenging. Here, we explore the assembly of two closely related homologues of the Ure2p protein from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces paradoxus, and by using a combination of kinetic theory with solution and biosensor assays, we are able to compare the rates of the individual microscopic steps of prion fibril assembly. We find that for these proteins the fragmentation rate is encoded in the structure of the seed fibrils, whereas the elongation rate is principally determined by the nature of the soluble precursor protein. Our results further reveal that fibrils that elongate faster but fracture less frequently can lose their ability to propagate as prions. These findings illuminate the connections between the in vitro aggregation of proteins and the in vivo proliferation of prions, and provide a framework for the quantitative understanding of the parameters governing the behavior of amyloid fibrils in normal and aberrant biological pathways.

Prion amyloid structure explains templating: how proteins can be genes

The yeast and fungal prions determine heritable and infectious traits, and are thus genes composed of protein. Most prions are inactive forms of a normal protein as it forms a self-propagating filamentous β-sheet-rich polymer structure called amyloid. Remarkably, a single prion protein sequence can form two or more faithfully inherited prion variants, in effect alleles of these genes. What protein structure explains this protein-based inheritance? Using solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance, we showed that the infectious amyloids of the prion domains of Ure2p, Sup35p and Rnq1p have an in-register parallel architecture. This structure explains how the amyloid filament ends can template the structure of a new protein as it joins the filament. The yeast prions [PSI(+)] and [URE3] are not found in wild strains, indicating that they are a disadvantage to the cell. Moreover, the prion domains of Ure2p and Sup35p have functions unrelated to prion formation, indicating that these domains are not present for the purpose of forming prions. Indeed, prion-forming ability is not conserved, even within Saccharomyces cerevisiae, suggesting that the rare formation of prions is a disease. The prion domain sequences generally vary more rapidly in evolution than does the remainder of the molecule, producing a barrier to prion transmission, perhaps selected in evolution by this protection.

Deletion of a Ure2 C-terminal prion-inhibiting region promotes the rate of fibril seed formation and alters interaction with Hsp40

Prions are proteins that can undergo a heritable conformational change to an aggregated amyloid-like state, which is then transmitted to other similar molecules. Ure2, the nitrogen metabolism regulation factor of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, shows prion properties in vivo and forms amyloid fibrils in vitro. Ure2 consists of an N-terminal prion-inducing domain and a C-terminal functional domain. Previous studies have shown that mutations affecting the prion properties of Ure2 are not restricted to the N-terminal prion domain: the deletion of residues 151-158 in the C-domain increases the in vivo prion-inducing propensity of Ure2. Here, we characterized this mutant in vitro and found that the 151-158 deletion has minimal effect on the thermodynamic stability or folding properties of the protein. However, deletion of residues 151-158 accelerates the nucleation, growth and fragmentation of amyloid-like aggregates in vitro, and the aggregates formed are able to seed formation of fibrils of the wild-type protein. In addition, the absence of 151-158 was found to disrupt the inhibitory effect of the Hsp40 chaperone Ydj1 on Ure2 fibril formation. These results suggest that the enhanced in vivo prion-inducing ability of the 151-158 deletion mutant is due to its enhanced ability to generate prion seeds.

Genetic and epigenetic control of the efficiency and fidelity of cross-species prion transmission

Self-perpetuating amyloid-based protein isoforms (prions) transmit neurodegenerative diseases in mammals and phenotypic traits in yeast. Although mechanisms that control species specificity of prion transmission are poorly understood, studies of closely related orthologues of yeast prion protein Sup35 demonstrate that cross-species prion transmission is modulated by both genetic (specific sequence elements) and epigenetic (prion variants, or 'strains') factors. Depending on the prion variant, the species barrier could be controlled at the level of either heterologous co-aggregation or conversion of the aggregate-associated heterologous protein into a prion polymer. Sequence divergence influences cross-species transmission of different prion variants in opposing ways. The ability of a heterologous prion domain to either faithfully reproduce or irreversibly switch the variant-specific prion patterns depends on both sequence divergence and the prion variant. Sequence variations within different modules of prion domains contribute to transmission barriers in different cross-species combinations. Individual amino acid substitutions within short amyloidogenic stretches drastically alter patterns of cross-species prion conversion, implicating these stretches as major determinants of species specificity.

Heterologous cross-seeding mimics cross-species prion conversion in a yeast model

Background

Prions are self-perpetuating, infectious, aggregated proteins that are associated with several neurodegenerative diseases in mammals and heritable traits in yeast. Sup35p, the protein determinant of the yeast prion [PSI⁺], has a conserved C terminal domain that performs the Sup35p function and a prion domain that is highly divergent. Prions formed by chimeras of the prion domain of various species fused to the C domain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae exhibit a 'species barrier', a phenomenon first observed in mammals, and often fail to transmit the prion state to chimeras with prion domains of other species.

Results

We focus on the chimera containing the prion domain of Pichia methanolica and examine how tight the 'species barrier' is between the chimera and S. cerevisiae. Although either of two Q/N-rich prions, [PSI⁺] or [PIN⁺], enhances the formation of the chimeric prion, [CHI⁺_PM], neither a non-Q/N-rich prion nor a non-prion Q-rich aggregate promotes the formation of [CHI⁺_PM]. [CHI⁺_PM] has many features characteristic of yeast prions: aggregation, cytoplasmic transmission and a two-level protein structure. [CHI⁺_PM] formed in the presence of [PSI⁺] can propagate independently of [PSI⁺] and forms at least two different variants of the prion, suggesting the generation and not transmission of new prion seeds.

Conclusion

Although the sequence similarity between the S. cerevisiae Q/N-rich prion determinants and the P. methanolica prion domain is low, we find that the chimera containing the prion domain of P. methanolica can occasionally be cross-seeded by [PSI⁺] to mimic crossing the species barrier, to form the [CHI⁺_PM] prion. Our data suggests that crossing the barrier occurs by a de novo formation of the foreign chimeric prion. Thus, the species barrier appears to be crossed by a heterologous seeding mechanism, wherein the infected prion protein uses the pre-existing seed as an inefficient template.

Disulfide bond formation significantly accelerates the assembly of Ure2p fibrils because of the proximity of a potential amyloid stretch

Aggregation of the Ure2 protein is at the origin of the [URE3] prion trait in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The N-terminal region of Ure2p is necessary and sufficient to induce the [URE3] phenotype in vivo and to polymerize into amyloid-like fibrils in vitro. However, as the N-terminal region is poorly ordered in the native state, making it difficult to detect structural changes in this region by spectroscopic methods, detailed information about the fibril assembly process is therefore lacking. Short fibril-forming peptide regions (4-7 residues) have been identified in a number of prion and other amyloid-related proteins, but such short regions have not yet been identified in Ure2p. In this study, we identify a unique cysteine mutant (R17C) that can greatly accelerate the fibril assembly kinetics of Ure2p under oxidizing conditions. We found that the segment QVNI, corresponding to residues 18-21 in Ure2p, plays a critical role in the fast assembly properties of R17C, suggesting that this segment represents a potential amyloid-forming region. A series of peptides containing the QVNI segment were found to form fibrils in vitro. Furthermore, the peptide fibrils could seed fibril formation for wild-type Ure2p. Preceding the QVNI segment with a cysteine or a hydrophobic residue, instead of a charged residue, caused the rate of assembly into fibrils to increase greatly for both peptides and full-length Ure2p. Our results indicate that the potential amyloid stretch and its preceding residue can modulate the fibril assembly of Ure2p to control the initiation of prion formation.

The cellular concentration of the yeast Ure2p prion protein affects its propagation as a prion

The [URE3] yeast prion is a self-propagating inactive form of the Ure2p protein. We show here that Ure2p from the species Saccharomyces paradoxus (Ure2p(Sp)) can be efficiently converted into a prion form and propagate [URE3] when expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae at physiological level. We found however that Ure2p(Sp) overexpression prevents efficient prion propagation. We have compared the aggregation rate and propagon numbers of Ure2p(Sp) and of S. cerevisiae Ure2p (Ure2p(Sc)) in [URE3] cells both at different expression levels. Overexpression of both Ure2p orthologues accelerates formation of large aggregates but Ure2p(Sp) aggregates faster than Ure2p(Sc). Although the yeast cells that contain these large Ure2p aggregates do not transmit [URE3] to daughter cells, the corresponding crude extract retains the ability to induce [URE3] in wild-type [ure3-0] cells. At low expression level, propagon numbers are higher with Ure2p(Sc) than with Ure2p(Sp). Overexpression of Ure2p decreases the number of [URE3] propagons with Ure2p(Sc). Together, our results demonstrate that the concentration of a prion protein is a key factor for prion propagation. We propose a model to explain how prion protein overexpression can produce a detrimental effect on prion propagation and why Ure2p(Sp) might be more sensitive to such effects than Ure2p(Sc).

Prion variants and species barriers among Saccharomyces Ure2 proteins

As hamster scrapie cannot infect mice, due to sequence differences in their PrP proteins, we find "species barriers" to transmission of the [URE3] prion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae among Ure2 proteins of S. cerevisiae, paradoxus, bayanus, cariocanus, and mikatae on the basis of differences among their Ure2p prion domain sequences. The rapid variation of the N-terminal Ure2p prion domains results in protection against the detrimental effects of infection by a prion, just as the PrP residue 129 Met/Val polymorphism may have arisen to protect humans from the effects of cannibalism. Just as spread of bovine spongiform encephalopathy prion variant is less impaired by species barriers than is sheep scrapie, we find that some [URE3] prion variants are infectious to another yeast species while other variants (with the identical amino acid sequence) are not. The species barrier is thus prion variant dependent as in mammals. [URE3] prion variant characteristics are maintained even on passage through the Ure2p of another species. Ure2p of Saccharomyces castelli has an N-terminal Q/N-rich "prion domain" but does not form prions (in S. cerevisiae) and is not infected with [URE3] from Ure2p of other Saccharomyces. This implies that conservation of its prion domain is not for the purpose of forming prions. Indeed the Ure2p prion domain has been shown to be important, though not essential, for the nitrogen catabolism regulatory role of the protein.

Protein inheritance (prions) based on parallel in-register beta-sheet amyloid structures

Most prions (infectious proteins) are self-propagating amyloids (filamentous protein multimers), and have been found in both mammals and fungal species. The prions [URE3] and [PSI+] of yeast are disease agents of Saccharomyces cerevisiae while [Het-s] of Podospora anserina may serve a normal cellular function. The parallel in-register beta-sheet structure shown by prion amyloids makes possible a templating action at the end of filaments which explains the faithful transmission of variant differences in these molecules. This property of self-reproduction, in turn, allows these proteins to act as de facto genes, encoding heritable information.

A regulatory role of the Rnq1 nonprion domain for prion propagation and polyglutamine aggregates

Prions are infectious, self-propagating protein conformations. Rnq1 is required for the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae prion [PIN(+)], which is necessary for the de novo induction of a second prion, [PSI(+)]. Here we isolated a [PSI(+)]-eliminating mutant, Rnq1Delta100, that deletes the nonprion domain of Rnq1. Rnq1Delta100 inhibits not only [PSI(+)] prion propagation but also [URE3] prion and huntingtin's polyglutamine aggregate propagation in a [PIN(+)] background but not in a [pin(-)] background. Rnq1Delta100, however, does not eliminate [PIN(+)]. These findings are interpreted as showing a possible involvement of the Rnq1 prion in the maintenance of heterologous prions and polyQ aggregates. Rnq1 and Rnq1Delta100 form a sodium dodecyl sulfate-stable and Sis1 (an Hsp40 chaperone protein)-containing coaggregate in [PIN(+)] cells. Importantly, Rnq1Delta100 is highly QN-rich and prone to self-aggregate or coaggregate with Rnq1 when coexpressed in [pin(-)] cells. However, the [pin(-)] Rnq1-Rnq1Delta100 coaggregate does not represent a prion-like aggregate. These findings suggest that [PIN(+)] Rnq1-Rnq1Delta100 aggregates interact with other transmissible and nontransmissible amyloids to destabilize them and that the nonprion domain of Rnq1 plays a crucial role in self-regulation of the highly reactive QN-rich prion domain of Rnq1.

Prions of fungi: inherited structures and biological roles

The term 'prion' means an infectious protein that does not need an accompanying nucleic acid. There are six fungal prions, including four self-propagating amyloids and two enzymes that are necessary to activate their inactive precursors. Here we explore the scope of the prion phenomenon, the biological and evolutionary roles of prions, the structural basis of the amyloid prions and the prominent role of chaperones (proteins that affect the folding of other proteins) and other cellular components in prion generation and propagation.