Modular and coordinated activity of AAA+ active sites in the double-ring ClpA unfoldase of the ClpAP protease

How the double-ring ClpAP protease motor grips the substrate to unfold and degrade stable proteins

Loops in the axial channels of ClpAP and other AAA+ proteases bind a short peptide degron connected by a linker to the N- or C-terminal residue of a native protein to initiate degradation. ATP hydrolysis then powers pore-loop movements that translocate these segments through the channel until a native domain is pulled against the narrow channel entrance, creating an unfolding force. Substrate unfolding is thought to depend on strong contacts between pore loops and a subset of amino acids in the unstructured sequence directly preceding the folded domain. Here, we identify such contact sequences that promote grip for ClpAP and use ClpA structures to place these sequences within ClpA's two AAA+ rings. The positions and chemical nature of certain residues within an unstructured segment that are positioned to interact with the D2 ring have major positive effects on substrate unfolding, whereas segments located within the D1 ring have little consequence. Within the D2-bound segment, two short elements are critical for accelerating degradation; one is at the "top" of D2 and consists of at least two properly positioned nonslippery residues. In contrast, the second D2 element, which can be as short as one residue, is positioned to contact pore loops near the "bottom" of this ring. Comparison with similar studies for ClpXP reveals that positioning a well-gripped substrate sequence within the major unfoldase motor is more important than its proximity to the folded domain and that charged, polar, and hydrophobic residues all contribute favorable contacts to substrate grip.

Structural and mechanistic studies on human LONP1 redefine the hand-over-hand translocation mechanism

AAA+ enzymes use energy from ATP hydrolysis to remodel diverse cellular targets. Structures of substrate-bound AAA+ complexes suggest that these enzymes employ a conserved hand-over-hand mechanism to thread substrates through their central pore. However, the fundamental aspects of the mechanisms governing motor function and substrate processing within specific AAA+ families remain unresolved. We used cryo-electron microscopy to structurally interrogate reaction intermediates from in vitro biochemical assays to inform the underlying regulatory mechanisms of the human mitochondrial AAA+ protease, LONP1. Our results demonstrate that substrate binding allosterically regulates proteolytic activity, and that LONP1 can adopt a configuration conducive to substrate translocation even when the ATPases are bound to ADP. These results challenge the conventional understanding of the hand-over-hand translocation mechanism, giving rise to an alternative model that aligns more closely with biochemical and biophysical data on related enzymes like ClpX, ClpA, the 26S proteasome, and Lon protease.

Deciphering the mechanism and function of Hsp100 unfoldases from protein structure

Hsp100 chaperones, also known as Clp proteins, constitute a family of ring-forming ATPases that differ in 3D structure and cellular function from other stress-inducible molecular chaperones. While the vast majority of ATP-dependent molecular chaperones promote the folding of either the nascent chain or a newly imported polypeptide to reach its native conformation, Hsp100 chaperones harness metabolic energy to perform the reverse and facilitate the unfolding of a misfolded polypeptide or protein aggregate. It is now known that inside cells and organelles, different Hsp100 members are involved in rescuing stress-damaged proteins from a previously aggregated state or in recycling polypeptides marked for degradation. Protein degradation is mediated by a barrel-shaped peptidase that physically associates with the Hsp100 hexamer to form a two-component system. Notable examples include the ClpA:ClpP (ClpAP) and ClpX:ClpP (ClpXP) proteases that resemble the ring-forming FtsH and Lon proteases, which unlike ClpAP and ClpXP, feature the ATP-binding and proteolytic domains in a single polypeptide chain. Recent advances in electron cryomicroscopy (cryoEM) together with single-molecule biophysical studies have now provided new mechanistic insight into the structure and function of this remarkable group of macromolecular machines.

FtsH degrades dihydrofolate reductase by recognizing a partially folded species

AAA+ proteolytic machines play essential roles in maintaining and rebalancing the cellular proteome in response to stress, developmental cues, and environmental changes. Of the five AAA+ proteases in Escherichia coli, FtsH is unique in its attachment to the inner membrane and its function in degrading both membrane and cytosolic proteins. E. coli dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) is a stable and biophysically well-characterized protein, which a previous study found resisted FtsH degradation despite the presence of an ssrA degron. By contrast, we find that FtsH degrades DHFR fused to a long peptide linker and ssrA tag. Surprisingly, we also find that FtsH degrades DHFR with shorter linkers and ssrA tag, and without any linker or tag. Thus, FtsH must be able to recognize a sequence element or elements within DHFR. We find that FtsH degradation of DHFR is noncanonical in the sense that it does not rely upon recognition of an unstructured polypeptide at or near the N-terminus or C-terminus of the substrate. Results using peptide-array experiments, mutant DHFR proteins, and fusion proteins suggest that FtsH recognizes an internal sequence in a species of DHFR that is partially unfolded. Overall, our findings provide insight into substrate recognition by FtsH and indicate that its degradation capacity is broader than previously reported.

AAA+ protease-adaptor structures reveal altered conformations and ring specialization

ClpAP, a two-ring AAA+ protease, degrades N-end-rule proteins bound by the ClpS adaptor. Here we present high-resolution cryo-EM structures of Escherichia coli ClpAPS complexes, showing how ClpA pore loops interact with the ClpS N-terminal extension (NTE), which is normally intrinsically disordered. In two classes, the NTE is bound by a spiral of pore-1 and pore-2 loops in a manner similar to substrate-polypeptide binding by many AAA+ unfoldases. Kinetic studies reveal that pore-2 loops of the ClpA D1 ring catalyze the protein remodeling required for substrate delivery by ClpS. In a third class, D2 pore-1 loops are rotated, tucked away from the channel and do not bind the NTE, demonstrating asymmetry in engagement by the D1 and D2 rings. These studies show additional structures and functions for key AAA+ elements. Pore-loop tucking may be used broadly by AAA+ unfoldases, for example, during enzyme pausing/unloading.

Division of labor between the pore-1 loops of the D1 and D2 AAA+ rings coordinates substrate selectivity of the ClpAP protease

ClpAP, an ATP-dependent protease consisting of ClpA, a double-ring hexameric unfoldase of the ATPases associated with diverse cellular activities superfamily, and the ClpP peptidase, degrades damaged and unneeded proteins to support cellular proteostasis. ClpA recognizes many protein substrates directly, but it can also be regulated by an adapter, ClpS, that modifies ClpA’s substrate profile toward N-degron substrates. Conserved tyrosines in the 12 pore-1 loops lining the central channel of the stacked D1 and D2 rings of ClpA are critical for degradation, but the roles of these residues in individual steps during direct or adapter-mediated degradation are poorly understood. Using engineered ClpA hexamers with zero, three, or six pore-1 loop mutations in each ATPases associated with diverse cellular activities superfamily ring, we found that active D1 pore loops initiate productive engagement of substrates, whereas active D2 pore loops are most important for mediating the robust unfolding of stable native substrates. In complex with ClpS, active D1 pore loops are required to form a high affinity ClpA•ClpS•substrate complex, but D2 pore loops are needed to “tug on” and remodel ClpS to transfer the N-degron substrate to ClpA. Overall, we find that the pore-1 loop tyrosines in D1 are critical for direct substrate engagement, whereas ClpS-mediated substrate delivery requires unique contributions from both the D1 and D2 pore loops. In conclusion, our study illustrates how pore loop engagement, substrate capture, and powering of the unfolding/translocation steps are distributed between the two rings of ClpA, illuminating new mechanistic features that may be common to double-ring protein unfolding machines.

Ultrafast pore-loop dynamics in a AAA+ machine point to a Brownian-ratchet mechanism for protein translocation

AAA+ ring–shaped machines, such as the disaggregation machines ClpB and Hsp104, mediate ATP-driven substrate translocation through their central channel by a set of pore loops. Recent structural studies have suggested a universal hand-over-hand translocation mechanism with slow and rigid subunit motions. However, functional and biophysical studies are in discord with this model. Here, we directly measure the real-time dynamics of the pore loops of ClpB during substrate threading, using single-molecule FRET spectroscopy. All pore loops undergo large-amplitude fluctuations on the microsecond time scale and change their conformation upon interaction with substrate proteins in an ATP-dependent manner. Conformational dynamics of two of the pore loops strongly correlate with disaggregation activity, suggesting that they are the main contributors to substrate pulling. This set of findings is rationalized in terms of an ultrafast Brownian-ratchet translocation mechanism, which likely acts in parallel to the much slower hand-over-hand process in ClpB and other AAA+ machines.

ClpAP proteolysis does not require rotation of the ClpA unfoldase relative to ClpP

AAA+ proteases perform regulated protein degradation in all kingdoms of life and consist of a hexameric AAA+ unfoldase/translocase in complex with a self-compartmentalized peptidase. Based on asymmetric features of cryo-EM structures and a sequential hand-over-hand model of substrate translocation, recent publications have proposed that the AAA+ unfoldases ClpA and ClpX rotate with respect to their partner peptidase ClpP to allow function. Here, we test this model by covalently crosslinking ClpA to ClpP to prevent rotation. We find that crosslinked ClpAP complexes unfold, translocate, and degrade protein substrates in vitro, albeit modestly slower than uncrosslinked enzyme controls. Rotation of ClpA with respect to ClpP is therefore not required for ClpAP protease activity, although some flexibility in how the AAA+ ring docks with ClpP may be necessary for optimal function.