Parallel vector memories in the brain of a bee as foundation for flexible navigation

Navigating space and the developing mind

In this article, we review the extensive and complex fabric of literature concerning the ontogenesis of spatial representations from earliest childhood to the elderly, including normal and abnormal aging (dementia and Alzheimer's disease). We also revisit fundamental concepts of the neuronal representations of space, egocentric vs. allocentric reference frames, and path integration. We highlight a thread of contradictions in spatial cognition from infant cognition to the first breakthrough at around the age of four. The contradictions reemerge in the literature on age-related decline in spatial cognition. We argue that these contradictions derive from the incorrect assumption that path integration is exclusively associated with allocentric frames of references, hence, signatures of path integration are often taken as evidence for allocentric perspective-taking. We posit that several contradictions in the literature can be resolved by acknowledging that path integration is agnostic to the type of reference frame and can be implemented in both egocentric and allocentric frames of reference. By freeing the frames of reference from path integration, we arrive at a developmental trajectory consistent across cognitive development studies, enabling us to ask questions that may dissolve the obscurity of this topic. The new model also sheds light on the very early stage of spatial cognition.

Vector-based navigation in desert ants: the significance of path-integration vectors

In the longstanding discussion of whether insects, especially central place foragers such as bees and ants, use metric representations of their landmark surroundings (so-called "cognitive maps"), the ability to find novel shortcuts between familiar locations has been considered one of the most decisive proofs for the use of such maps. Here we show by channel-based field experiments that desert ants Cataglyphis can travel such shortcuts between locations (defined by memorized goal vectors) just on the basis of path integration. When trained to visit two spatially separated feeders A and B they later travel the hitherto novel route A→B. This behavior may originate from the interaction of goal vectors retrieved from long-term memory and the current vector computed by the continuously running path integrator. Based on former experiments, we further argue that path integration is a necessary requirement also for acquiring landmark information (in form of learned goal-directed views). This emphasizes the paramount importance of path integration in these central place foragers. Finally we hypothesize that the ant's overall system of navigation consists in the optimal combination of path-integration vectors and view-based vectors, and thus handles and uses vectorial information without the need of constructing a "vector map", in which vectors are linked to known places in the environment others than to the origin of all journeys, the nest.

NSF Workshop Report: Exploring Measurements and Interpretations of Intelligent Behaviors Across Animal Model Systems

Defining intelligence is a challenging and fraught task, but one that neuroscientists are repeatedly confronted with. A central goal of neuroscience is to understand how phenomena like intelligent behaviors emerge from nervous systems. This requires some determination of what defines intelligence and how to measure it. The challenge is multifaceted. For instance, as we begin to describe and understand the brain in increasingly specific physical terms (e.g., anatomy, cell types, activity patterns), we amplify an ever-growing divide in how we connect measurable properties of the brain to less tangible concepts like intelligence. As our appreciation for evolutionary diversity in neuroscience grows, we are further confronted with whether there can be a unifying theory of intelligence. The National Science Foundation (NSF) NeuroNex consortium recently gathered experts from multiple animal model systems to discuss intelligence across species. We summarize here the different perspectives offered by the consortium, with the goal of promoting thought and debate of this ancient question from a modern perspective, and asking whether defining intelligence is a useful exercise in neuroscience or an ill-posed and distracting question. We present data from the vantage points of humans, macaques, ferrets, crows, octopuses, bees, and flies, highlighting some of the noteworthy capabilities of each species within the context of each species' ecological niche and how these may be challenged by climate change. We also include a remarkable example of convergent evolution between primates and crows in the circuit and molecular basis for working memory in these highly divergent animal species.

The neuroethology of ant navigation

Unlike any other group of animals, all ant species are social: individual ants share the food they gather with their nestmates and as a consequence they must repeatedly leave their nest to find food and then return home with it. These back-and-forth foraging trips have been studied for about a century and much of our growing understanding of the strategies underlying animal navigation has come from these studies. One important strategy that ants use to keep track of where they are on a foraging trip is 'path integration', in which they continuously update a 'home vector' that gives their estimated distance and direction from the nest. As path integration accumulates errors, it cannot be relied on to bring ants precisely home: such precision is accomplished by using views of the nest acquired before they start foraging. Further learning is scaffolded by home vectors or remembered food vectors, which guide a route and help in learning useful views experienced on the way. Many species rely on olfaction as well as vision for route guidance and the full details of their foraging paths have revealed how ants use a mix of innate and learnt multisensory cues. Wood ants, a species on which we focus in this review, take an oscillating path along a pheromone trail to sample odours, but acquire visual information only at the peaks and troughs of the oscillations. To provide a working model of the neural basis of the multimodal navigational strategies of ants, we outline the anatomy and functioning of major central brain areas and neural circuits - the central complex, mushroom bodies and lateral accessory lobes - that are involved in the coordination of navigational behaviour and the learning of visual and olfactory patterns. Because ant brains have not yet been well-studied, we rely on the work that has been done with other species - notably, Drosophila, silkworm moths and bees - to derive plausible neural circuitry that can deliver the ants' navigational strategies.