B protein of bacteriophage mu is an ATPase that preferentially stimulates intermolecular DNA strand transfer

Elucidating the Architectural dynamics of MuB filaments in bacteriophage Mu DNA transposition

MuB is a non-specific DNA-binding protein and AAA+ ATPase that significantly influences the DNA transposition process of bacteriophage Mu, especially in target DNA selection for transposition. While studies have established the ATP-dependent formation of MuB filament as pivotal to this process, the high-resolution structure of a full-length MuB protomer and the underlying molecular mechanisms governing its oligomerization remain elusive. Here, we use cryo-EM to obtain a 3.4-Å resolution structure of the ATP(+)-DNA(+)-MuB helical filament, which encapsulates the DNA substrate within its axial channel. The structure categorizes MuB within the initiator clade of the AAA+ protein family and precisely locates the ATP and DNA binding sites. Further investigation into the oligomeric states of MuB show the existence of various forms of the filament. These findings lead to a mechanistic model where MuB forms opposite helical filaments along the DNA, exposing potential target sites on the bare DNA and then recruiting MuA, which stimulates MuB's ATPase activity and disrupts the previously formed helical structure. When this happens, MuB generates larger ring structures and dissociates from the DNA.

Molecular basis for transposase activation by a dedicated AAA+ ATPase

Transposases drive chromosomal rearrangements and the dissemination of drug-resistance genes and toxins1-3. Although some transposases act alone, many rely on dedicated AAA+ ATPase subunits that regulate site selectivity and catalytic function through poorly understood mechanisms. Using IS21 as a model transposase system, we show how an ATPase regulator uses nucleotide-controlled assembly and DNA deformation to enable structure-based site selectivity, transposase recruitment, and activation and integration. Solution and cryogenic electron microscopy studies show that the IstB ATPase self-assembles into an autoinhibited pentamer of dimers that tightly curves target DNA into a half-coil. Two of these decamers dimerize, which stabilizes the target nucleic acid into a kinked S-shaped configuration that engages the IstA transposase at the interface between the two IstB oligomers to form an approximately 1 MDa transpososome complex. Specific interactions stimulate regulator ATPase activity and trigger a large conformational change on the transposase that positions the catalytic site to perform DNA strand transfer. These studies help explain how AAA+ ATPase regulators-which are used by classical transposition systems such as Tn7, Mu and CRISPR-associated elements-can remodel their substrate DNA and cognate transposases to promote function.

IS21 family transposase cleaved donor complex traps two right-handed superhelical crossings

Transposases are ubiquitous enzymes that catalyze DNA rearrangement events with broad impacts on gene expression, genome evolution, and the spread of drug-resistance in bacteria. Here, we use biochemical and structural approaches to define the molecular determinants by which IstA, a transposase present in the widespread IS21 family of mobile elements, catalyzes efficient DNA transposition. Solution studies show that IstA engages the transposon terminal sequences to form a high-molecular weight complex and promote DNA integration. A 3.4 Å resolution structure of the transposase bound to transposon ends corroborates our biochemical findings and reveals that IstA self-assembles into a highly intertwined tetramer that synapses two supercoiled terminal inverted repeats. The three-dimensional organization of the IstA•DNA cleaved donor complex reveals remarkable similarities with retroviral integrases and classic transposase systems, such as Tn7 and bacteriophage Mu, and provides insights into IS21 transposition.

Jumping Ahead with Sleeping Beauty: Mechanistic Insights into Cut-and-Paste Transposition

Sleeping Beauty (SB) is a transposon system that has been widely used as a genetic engineering tool. Central to the development of any transposon as a research tool is the ability to integrate a foreign piece of DNA into the cellular genome. Driven by the need for efficient transposon-based gene vector systems, extensive studies have largely elucidated the molecular actors and actions taking place during SB transposition. Close transposon relatives and other recombination enzymes, including retroviral integrases, have served as useful models to infer functional information relevant to SB. Recently obtained structural data on the SB transposase enable a direct insight into the workings of this enzyme. These efforts cumulatively allowed the development of novel variants of SB that offer advanced possibilities for genetic engineering due to their hyperactivity, integration deficiency, or targeting capacity. However, many aspects of the process of transposition remain poorly understood and require further investigation. We anticipate that continued investigations into the structure-function relationships of SB transposition will enable the development of new generations of transposition-based vector systems, thereby facilitating the use of SB in preclinical studies and clinical trials.

Target DNA bending by the Mu transpososome promotes careful transposition and prevents its reversal

The transposition of bacteriophage Mu serves as a model system for understanding DDE transposases and integrases. All available structures of these enzymes at the end of the transposition reaction, including Mu, exhibit significant bends in the transposition target site DNA. Here we use Mu to investigate the ramifications of target DNA bending on the transposition reaction. Enhancing the flexibility of the target DNA or prebending it increases its affinity for transpososomes by over an order of magnitude and increases the overall reaction rate. This and FRET confirm that flexibility is interrogated early during the interaction between the transposase and a potential target site, which may be how other DNA binding proteins can steer selection of advantageous target sites. We also find that the conformation of the target DNA after strand transfer is involved in preventing accidental catalysis of the reverse reaction, as conditions that destabilize this conformation also trigger reversal.

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21777.001

Pieces of DNA called transposons can move or copy themselves around the genome. Some viruses – such as HIV and Mu (a virus that infects bacteria) – act as transposons to hide their DNA by inserting it into their host’s genome.

Mu, HIV and many transposons all work in the same, somewhat unusual way. Like many chemical reactions, joining DNAs together needs a source of energy to make it happen, yet these viruses and transposons do not need high energy inputs to work. In addition, they do not look for a specific DNA sequence to insert their DNA into. This gives them the advantage of inserting copies of their DNA anywhere in the host’s genome, but also means that multiple copies might mistakenly insert into each other.

Visualizations of the insertion process show that the DNA that the viruses insert their DNA into is always bent like a U-turn. Why does this bending occur? It may be that the bending helps the virus to choose where in the DNA to insert and acts as a way to power the chemical reaction that joins the DNA. To investigate this possibility, Fuller and Rice performed experiments using purified fragments of DNA and the enzyme from Mu that does the DNA joining chemistry. The results revealed that making the insertion site DNA easier to bend made the insertion much faster. Furthermore, a mutant enzyme that struggled to bend the DNA had trouble keeping the chemistry going, and so the viral DNA would accidentally pop back out after it was joined. Thus the insertion site DNA is like a spring: the enzyme puts a lot of energy into bending it, but once the viral DNA has been inserted that energy is released to power the reaction to completion.

Fuller and Rice conclude that if other proteins were to pre-bend or otherwise make the DNA more flexible, this would tell the DNA-joining enzyme where to insert, which helps explain the roles of known targeting proteins for Mu and HIV. Further work is now needed to investigate whether these other targeting proteins exist for other viruses and transposons, and to identify them.

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21777.002

Mechanisms of Evolution in High-Consequence Drug Resistance Plasmids

The dissemination of resistance among bacteria has been facilitated by the fact that resistance genes are usually located on a diverse and evolving set of transmissible plasmids. However, the mechanisms generating diversity and enabling adaptation within highly successful resistance plasmids have remained obscure, despite their profound clinical significance. To understand these mechanisms, we have performed a detailed analysis of the mobilome (the entire mobile genetic element content) of a set of previously sequenced carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) from the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center. This analysis revealed that plasmid reorganizations occurring in the natural context of colonization of human hosts were overwhelmingly driven by genetic rearrangements carried out by replicative transposons working in concert with the process of homologous recombination. A more complete understanding of the molecular mechanisms and evolutionary forces driving rearrangements in resistance plasmids may lead to fundamentally new strategies to address the problem of antibiotic resistance.

The spread of antibiotic resistance among Gram-negative bacteria is a serious public health threat, as it can critically limit the types of drugs that can be used to treat infected patients. In particular, carbapenem-resistant members of the Enterobacteriaceae family are responsible for a significant and growing burden of morbidity and mortality. Here, we report on the mechanisms underlying the evolution of several plasmids carried by previously sequenced clinical Enterobacteriaceae isolates from the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (NIH CC). Our ability to track genetic rearrangements that occurred within resistance plasmids was dependent on accurate annotation of the mobile genetic elements within the plasmids, which was greatly aided by access to long-read DNA sequencing data and knowledge of their mechanisms. Mobile genetic elements such as transposons and integrons have been strongly associated with the rapid spread of genes responsible for antibiotic resistance. Understanding the consequences of their actions allowed us to establish unambiguous evolutionary relationships between plasmids in the analysis set.

Sleeping Beauty transposition: from biology to applications

Sleeping Beauty (SB) is the first synthetic DNA transposon that was shown to be active in a wide variety of species. Here, we review studies from the last two decades addressing both basic biology and applications of this transposon. We discuss how host-transposon interaction modulates transposition at different steps of the transposition reaction. We also discuss how the transposon was translated for gene delivery and gene discovery purposes. We critically review the system in clinical, pre-clinical and non-clinical settings as a non-viral gene delivery tool in comparison with viral technologies. We also discuss emerging SB-based hybrid vectors aimed at combining the attractive safety features of the transposon with effective viral delivery. The success of the SB-based technology can be fundamentally attributed to being able to insert fairly randomly into genomic regions that allow stable long-term expression of the delivered transgene cassette. SB has emerged as an efficient and economical toolkit for safe and efficient gene delivery for medical applications.

A set of mini-Mu transposons for versatile cloning of circular DNA and novel dual-transposon strategy for increased efficiency

Mu transposition-based cloning of DNA circles employs in vitro transposition reaction to deliver both the plasmid origin of replication and a selectable marker into the target DNA of interest. We report here the construction of a platform for the purpose that contains ten mini-Mu transposons with five different replication origins, enabling a variety of research approaches for the discovery and study of circular DNA. We also demonstrate that the simultaneous use of two transposons, one with the origin of replication and the other with selectable marker, is beneficial as it improves the cloning efficiency by reducing the fraction of autointegration-derived plasmid clones. The constructed transposons now provide a set of new tools for the studies on DNA circles and widen the applicability of Mu transposition based approaches to clone circular DNA from various sources.

Transposons to toxins: the provenance, architecture and diversification of a widespread class of eukaryotic effectors

Enzymatic effectors targeting nucleic acids, proteins and other cellular components are the mainstay of conflicts across life forms. Using comparative genomics we identify a large class of eukaryotic proteins, which include effectors from oomycetes, fungi and other parasites. The majority of these proteins have a characteristic domain architecture with one of several N-terminal 'Header' domains, which are predicted to play a role in trafficking of these effectors, including a novel version of the Ubiquitin fold. The Headers are followed by one or more diverse C-terminal domains, such as restriction endonuclease (REase), protein kinase, HNH endonuclease, LK-nuclease (a RNase) and multiple distinct peptidase domains, which are predicted to carry their toxicity determinants. The most common types of these proteins appear to have originated from prokaryotic transposases (e.g. TN7 and Mu) and combine a CDC6/ORC1-STAND clade NTPase domain with a C-terminal REase domain. Other than the so-called Crinkler effectors of oomycetes and fungi, these effectors are encoded by other eukaryotic parasites such as trypanosomatids (the RHS proteins) and the rhizarian Plasmodiophora, and symbionts like Capsaspora Remarkably, we also find these proteins in free-living eukaryotes, including several viridiplantae, fungi, amoebozoans and animals. These versions might either still be transposons or function in other poorly understood eukaryote-specific inter-organismal and inter-genomic conflicts. These include the Medea1 selfish element of Tribolium that spreads via post-zygotic killing. We present a unified mechanism for the recombination-dependent diversification and action of this widespread class of molecular weaponry deployed across diverse conflicts ranging from parasitic to free-living forms.

Sleeping Beauty Transposition

Sleeping Beauty (SB) is a synthetic transposon that was constructed based on sequences of transpositionally inactive elements isolated from fish genomes. SB is a Tc1/mariner superfamily transposon following a cut-and-paste transpositional reaction, during which the element-encoded transposase interacts with its binding sites in the terminal inverted repeats of the transposon, promotes the assembly of a synaptic complex, catalyzes excision of the element out of its donor site, and integrates the excised transposon into a new location in target DNA. SB transposition is dependent on cellular host factors. Transcriptional control of transposase expression is regulated by the HMG2L1 transcription factor. Synaptic complex assembly is promoted by the HMGB1 protein and regulated by chromatin structure. SB transposition is highly dependent on the nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway of double-strand DNA break repair that generates a transposon footprint at the excision site. Through its association with the Miz-1 transcription factor, the SB transposase downregulates cyclin D1 expression that results in a slowdown of the cell-cycle in the G1 phase, where NHEJ is preferentially active. Transposon integration occurs at TA dinucleotides in the target DNA, which are duplicated at the flanks of the integrated transposon. SB shows a random genome-wide insertion profile in mammalian cells when launched from episomal vectors and "local hopping" when launched from chromosomal donor sites. Some of the excised transposons undergo a self-destructive autointegration reaction, which can partially explain why longer elements transpose less efficiently. SB became an important molecular tool for transgenesis, insertional mutagenesis, and gene therapy.

An Atypical AAA+ ATPase Assembly Controls Efficient Transposition through DNA Remodeling and Transposase Recruitment

Transposons are ubiquitous genetic elements that drive genome rearrangements, evolution, and the spread of infectious disease and drug-resistance. Many transposons, such as Mu, Tn7, and IS21, require regulatory AAA+ ATPases for function. We use X-ray crystallography and cryo-electron microscopy to show that the ATPase subunit of IS21, IstB, assembles into a clamshell-shaped decamer that sandwiches DNA between two helical pentamers of ATP-associated AAA+ domains, sharply bending the duplex into a 180° U-turn. Biochemical studies corroborate key features of the structure and further show that the IS21 transposase, IstA, recognizes the IstB•DNA complex and promotes its disassembly by stimulating ATP hydrolysis. Collectively, these studies reveal a distinct manner of higher-order assembly and client engagement by a AAA+ ATPase and suggest a mechanistic model where IstB binding and subsequent DNA bending primes a selected insertion site for efficient transposition.

The N-terminal domain of MuB protein has striking structural similarity to DNA-binding domains and mediates MuB filament-filament interactions

MuB is an ATP-dependent DNA-binding protein that regulates the activity of MuA transposase and delivers the target DNA for transposition of phage Mu. Mechanistic insight into MuB function is limited to its AAA+ ATPase module, which upon ATP binding assembles into helical filaments around the DNA. However, the structure and function of the flexible N-terminal domain (NTD) appended to the AAA+ module remains uncharacterized. Here we report the solution structure of MuB NTD determined by NMR spectroscopy. The structure reveals a compact domain formed by four α-helices connected by short loops, and confirms the presence of a helix-turn-helix motif. High structural similarity and sequence homology with λ repressor-like DNA-binding domains suggest a possible role of MuB NTD in DNA binding. We also demonstrate that the NTD directly mediates the ability of MuB to establish filament-filament interactions. These findings lead us to a model in which the NTD interacts with the AAA+ spirals and perhaps also with the DNA bound within the filament, favoring MuB polymerization and filament clustering. We propose that the MuB NTD-dependent filament interactions might be an effective mechanism to bridge distant DNA regions during Mu transposition.

Deciphering the Roles of Multicomponent Recognition Signals by the AAA+ Unfoldase ClpX

ATP-dependent protein remodeling and unfolding enzymes are key participants in protein metabolism in all cells. How these often-destructive enzymes specifically recognize target protein complexes is poorly understood. Here, we use the well-studied AAA+ unfoldase-substrate pair, Escherichia coli ClpX and MuA transposase, to address how these powerful enzymes recognize target protein complexes. We demonstrate that the final transposition product, which is a DNA-bound tetramer of MuA, is preferentially recognized over the monomeric apo-protein through its multivalent display of ClpX recognition tags. The important peptide tags include one at the C-terminus ("C-tag") that binds the ClpX pore and a second one (enhancement or "E-tag") that binds the ClpX N-terminal domain. We construct a chimeric protein to interrogate subunit-specific contributions of these tags. Efficient remodeling of MuA tetramers requires ClpX to contact a minimum of three tags (one C-tag and two or more E-tags), and that these tags are contributed by different subunits within the tetramer. The individual recognition peptides bind ClpX weakly (KD>70 μM) but impart a high-affinity interaction (KD~1.0 μM) when combined in the MuA tetramer. When the weak C-tag signal is replaced with a stronger recognition tag, the E-tags become unnecessary and ClpX's preference for the complex over MuA monomers is eliminated. Additionally, because the spatial orientation of the tags is predicted to change during the final step of transposition, this recognition strategy suggests how AAA+ unfoldases specifically distinguish the completed "end-stage" form of a particular complex for the ideal biological outcome.

Heteromeric transposase elements: generators of genomic islands across diverse bacteria

Horizontally acquired genetic information in bacterial chromosomes accumulates in blocks termed genomic islands. Tn7-like transposons form genomic islands at a programmed insertion site in bacterial chromosomes, attTn7. Transposition involves five transposon-encoded genes (tnsABCDE) including an atypical heteromeric transposase. One transposase subunit, TnsB, is from the large family of bacterial transposases, the second, TnsA, is related to endonucleases. A regulator protein, TnsC, functions with different target site selecting proteins to recognize different targets. TnsD directs transposition into attTn7, while TnsE encourages horizontal transmission by targeting mobile plasmids. Recent work suggests that distantly related elements with heteromeric transposases exist with alternate targeting pathways that also facilitate the formation of genomic islands. Tn6230 and related elements can be found at a single position in a gene of unknown function (yhiN) in various bacteria as well as in mobile plasmids. Another group we term Tn6022-like elements form pathogenicity islands in the Acinetobacter baumannii comM gene. We find that Tn6022-like elements also appear to have an uncharacterized mechanism for provoking internal transposition and deletion events that serve as a conduit for evolving new elements. As a group, heteromeric transposase elements utilize diverse target site selection mechanisms adapted to the spread and rearrangement of genomic islands.

MuB gives a new twist to target DNA selection

Transposition target immunity is a phenomenon observed in some DNA transposons that are able to distinguish the host chromosome from their own DNA sequence, thus avoiding self-destructive insertions. The first molecular insight into target selection and immunity mechanisms came from the study of phage Mu transposition, which uses the protein MuB as a barrier to self-insertion. MuB is an ATP-dependent non-specific DNA binding protein that regulates the activity of the MuA transposase and captures target DNA for transposition. However, a detailed mechanistic understanding of MuB functioning was hindered by the poor solubility of the MuB-ATP complexes. Here we comment on the recent discovery that MuB is an AAA+ ATPase that upon ATP binding assembles into helical filaments that coat the DNA. Remarkably, the helical parameters of the MuB filament do not match those of the bound DNA. This intriguing mismatch symmetry led us to propose a model on how MuB targets DNA for transposition, favoring DNA bending and recognition by the transposase at the filament edge. We also speculate on a different protective role of MuB during immunity, where filament stickiness could favor the condensation of the DNA into a compact state that occludes it from the transposase.

MuB is an AAA+ ATPase that forms helical filaments to control target selection for DNA transposition

MuB is an ATP-dependent nonspecific DNA-binding protein that regulates the activity of the MuA transposase and captures target DNA for transposition. Mechanistic understanding of MuB function has previously been hindered by MuB's poor solubility. Here we combine bioinformatic, mutagenic, biochemical, and electron microscopic analyses to unmask the structure and function of MuB. We demonstrate that MuB is an ATPase associated with diverse cellular activities (AAA+ ATPase) and forms ATP-dependent filaments with or without DNA. We also identify critical residues for MuB's ATPase, DNA binding, protein polymerization, and MuA interaction activities. Using single-particle electron microscopy, we show that MuB assembles into a helical filament, which binds the DNA in the axial channel. The helical parameters of the MuB filament do not match those of the coated DNA. Despite this protein-DNA symmetry mismatch, MuB does not deform the DNA duplex. These findings, together with the influence of MuB filament size on strand-transfer efficiency, lead to a model in which MuB-imposed symmetry transiently deforms the DNA at the boundary of the MuB filament and results in a bent DNA favored by MuA for transposition.

Separate structural and functional domains of Tn4430 transposase contribute to target immunity

Like other transposons of the Tn3 family, Tn4430 exhibits target immunity, a process that prevents multiple insertions of the transposon into the same DNA molecule. Immunity is conferred by the terminal inverted repeats of the transposon and is specific to each element of the family, indicating that the transposase TnpA is directly involved in the process.However, the molecular mechanism whereby this protein promotes efficient transposition into permissive targets while preventing transposition into immune targets remains unknown. Here, we demonstrate that both functions of TnpA can be uncoupled from each other by isolating and characterizing mutants that are proficient in transposition (T+) but impaired in immunity (I-). The identified T+/I- mutations are clustered into separate structural and functional domains of TnpA, indicating that different activities of the protein contribute to immunity.Combination of separate mutations had synergistic effects on target immunity but contrasting effects on transposition. One class of mutations was found to stimulate transposition, whereas other mutations appeared to reduce TnpA activity. The data are discussed with respect to alternative models in which TnpA acts as a specific determinant to both establish and respond to immunity.

HIV DNA is heavily uracilated, which protects it from autointegration

Human immune cells infected by HIV naturally contain high uracil content, and HIV reverse transcriptase (RT) does not distinguish between dUTP and dTTP. Many DNA viruses and retroviruses encode a dUTPase or uracil-DNA glycosylase (UNG) to counteract uracil incorporation. However, although HIV virions are thought to contain cellular UNG2, replication of HIV produced in cells lacking UNG activity does not appear to be impaired. Here we show that HIV reverse transcripts generated in primary human immune cells are heavily uracilated (>500 uracils per 10 kb HIV genome). We find that HIV DNA uracilation, rather than being dangerous, may promote the early phase of the viral life cycle. Shortly after reverse transcription, the ends of the HIV DNA are activated by the viral integrase (IN) in preparation for chromosomal insertion. However, the activated ends can attack the viral DNA itself in a suicidal side pathway, called autointegration. We find here that uracilation of target DNA inhibits the strand transfer of HIV DNA ends by IN, thereby inhibiting autointegration and facilitating chromosomal integration and viral replication. When uracilation is increased by incubating uracil-poor cells in the presence of increasing concentrations of dUTP or by infecting with virus that contains the cytosine deaminase APOBEC3G (A3G), the proportion of reverse transcripts that undergo suicidal autointegration decreases. Thus, HIV tolerates, or even benefits from, nonmutagenic uracil incorporation during reverse transcription in human immune cells.

Phage Mu transposition immunity: protein pattern formation along DNA by a diffusion-ratchet mechanism

DNA transposons integrate into host chromosomes with limited target sequence specificity. Without mechanisms to avoid insertion into themselves, transposons risk self-destruction. Phage Mu avoids this problem by transposition immunity, involving MuA-transposase and MuB ATP-dependent DNA-binding protein. MuB-bound DNA acts as an efficient transposition target, but MuA clusters bound to Mu DNA ends activate the MuB-ATPase and dissociate MuB from their neighborhood before target site commitment, making the regions near Mu ends a poor target. This MuA-cluster-MuB interaction requires formation of DNA loops between the MuA- and the MuB-bound DNA sites. At early times, MuB clusters are disassembled via loops with smaller average size, and at later times, MuA clusters find distantly located MuB clusters by forming loops with larger average sizes. We demonstrate that iterative loop formation/disruption cycles with intervening diffusional steps result in larger DNA loops, leading to preferential insertion of the transposon at sites distant from the transposon ends.

Transposition of the human Hsmar1 transposon: rate-limiting steps and the importance of the flanking TA dinucleotide in second strand cleavage

Hsmar1 is a member of the mariner family of DNA transposons. Although widespread in nature, their molecular mechanism remains obscure. Many other cut-and-paste elements use a hairpin intermediate to cleave the two strands of DNA at each transposon end. However, this intermediate is absent in mariner, suggesting that these elements use a fundamentally different mechanism for second-strand cleavage. We have taken advantage of the faithful and efficient in vitro reaction provided by Hsmar1 to characterize the products and intermediates of transposition. We report different factors that particularly affect the reaction, which are the reaction pH and the transposase concentration. Kinetic analysis revealed that first-strand nicking and integration are rapid. The rate of the reaction is limited in part by the divalent metal ion-dependent assembly of a complex between transposase and the transposon end(s) prior to the first catalytic step. Second-strand cleavage is the rate-limiting catalytic step of the reaction. We discuss our data in light of a model for the two metal ion catalytic mechanism and propose that mariner excision involves a significant conformational change between first- and second-strand cleavage at each transposon end. Furthermore, this conformational change requires specific contacts between transposase and the flanking TA dinucleotide.

The SET complex acts as a barrier to autointegration of HIV-1

Retroviruses and retrotransposons are vulnerable to a suicidal pathway known as autointegration, which occurs when the 3′-ends of the reverse transcript are activated by integrase and then attack sites within the viral DNA. Retroelements have diverse strategies for suppressing autointegration, but how HIV-1 protects itself from autointegration is not well-understood. Here we show that knocking down any of the components of the SET complex, an endoplasmic reticulum-associated complex that contains 3 DNases (the base excision repair endonuclease APE1, 5′-3′ exonuclease TREX1, and endonuclease NM23-H1), inhibits HIV-1 and HIV-2/SIV, but not MLV or ASV, infection. Inhibition occurs at a step in the viral life cycle after reverse transcription but before chromosomal integration. Antibodies to SET complex proteins capture HIV-1 DNA in the cytoplasm, suggesting a direct interaction between the SET complex and the HIV preintegration complex. Cloning of HIV integration sites in cells with knocked down SET complex components revealed an increase in autointegration, which was verified using a novel semi-quantitative nested PCR assay to detect autointegrants. When SET complex proteins are knocked down, autointegration increases 2–3–fold and chromosomal integration correspondingly decreases ∼3-fold. Therefore, the SET complex facilitates HIV-1 infection by preventing suicidal autointegration.

When HIV-1 infects a cell, its genomic RNA is copied into DNA. The ends of the viral DNA are then activated by the viral integrase enzyme to enable DNA insertion into a host cell chromosome. However, the activated ends can alternately insert into the virus itself by a process called autointegration, which is a suicidal pathway that aborts the infection. How HIV-1 protects itself from suicidal autointegration is not known. Here we show that a cytoplasmic complex, called the SET complex, which contains three DNA digesting enzymes, binds to HIV-1 and protects it from autointegration.

Dissecting the roles of MuB in Mu transposition: ATP regulation of DNA binding is not essential for target delivery

Collaboration between MuA transposase and its activator protein, MuB, is essential for properly regulated transposition. MuB activates MuA catalytic activity, selects target DNA, and stimulates transposition into the selected target site. Selection of appropriate target DNA requires ATP hydrolysis by the MuB ATPase. By fusing MuB to a site-specific DNA-binding protein, the Arc repressor, we generated a MuB variant that could select target DNA independently of ATP. This Arc-MuB fusion protein allowed us to test whether ATP binding and hydrolysis by MuB are necessary for stimulation of transposition into selected DNA, a process termed target delivery. We find that with the fusion proteins, MuB-dependent target delivery occurs efficiently under conditions where ATP hydrolysis is prevented by mutation or use of ADP. In contrast, no delivery was detected in the absence of nucleotide. These data indicate that the ATP- and MuA-regulated DNA-binding activity of MuB is not essential for target delivery but that activation of MuA by MuB strictly requires nucleotide-bound MuB. Furthermore, we find that the fusion protein directs transposition to regions of the DNA within 40-750 bp of its own binding site. Taken together, these results suggest that target delivery by MuB occurs as a consequence of the ability of MuB to stimulate MuA while simultaneously tethering MuA to a selected target DNA. This tethered-activator model provides an attractive explanation for other examples of protein-stimulated control of target site selection.

Translation factor IF2 at the interface of transposition and replication by the PriA-PriC pathway

Bacteriophage Mu DNA synthesis is initiated during transposition by replication restart proteins PriA, DnaT and either PriB or PriC. The PriA-PriC pathway requires PriA's helicase activity and other host factors that promote the orderly transition from transpososome to replisome on the Mu DNA template. The host factor MRFalpha-PR, which removes obstacles to PriA binding and promotes the PriA-PriC pathway, was identified to be the translation initiation factor IF2. Purified isoform IF2-2, which is truncated at the N-terminal end, had full MRFalpha-PR activity whereas full-length IF2-1 was inactive. IF2-2 was bound to the Mu DNA template specifically at the step for prereplisome assembly. Prior steps in the orderly transition from transpososome were essential to promote efficient IF2-2 binding. Moreover, PriA helicase activity was subsequently needed to displace IF2-2, remodelling the template to permit replisome assembly. IF2's role in the transition mechanism as well as its function as G protein and translation factor suggest its potential to regulate DNA synthesis by this pathway.

The dynamic Mu transpososome: MuB activation prevents disintegration

DNA transposases use a single active center to sequentially cleave the transposable element DNA and join this DNA to a target site. Recombination requires controlled conformational changes within the transposase to ensure that these chemically distinct steps occur at the right time and place, and that the reaction proceeds in the net forward direction. Mu transposition is catalyzed by a stable complex of MuA transposase bound to paired Mu DNA ends (a transpososome). We find that Mu transpososomes efficiently catalyze disintegration when recombination on one end of the Mu DNA is blocked. The MuB activator protein controls the integration versus disintegration equilibrium. When MuB is present, disintegration occurs slowly and transpososomes that have disintegrated catalyze subsequent rounds of recombination. In the absence of MuB, disintegration goes to completion. These results together with experiments mapping the MuA-MuB contacts during DNA joining suggest that MuB controls progression of recombination by specifically stabilizing a concerted transition to the "joining" configuration of MuA. Thus, we propose that MuB's interaction with the transpososome actively promotes coupled joining of both ends of the element DNA into the same target site and may provide a mechanism to antagonize formation of single-end transposition products.

Interactions of phage Mu enhancer and termini that specify the assembly of a topologically unique interwrapped transpososome

The higher-order DNA-protein complex that carries out the chemical steps of phage Mu transposition is organized by bridging interactions among three DNA sites, the left (L) and right (R) ends of Mu, and an enhancer element (E), mediated by the transposase protein MuA. A subset of the six subunits of MuA associated with their cognate sub-sites at L and R communicate with the enhancer to trigger the stepwise assembly of the functional transpososome. The DNA follows a well-defined path within the transpososome, trapping five supercoil nodes comprising two E-R crossings, one E-L crossing and two L-R crossings. The enhancer is a critical DNA element in specifying the unique interwrapped topology of the three-site LER synapse. In this study, we used multiple strategies to characterize Mu end-enhancer interactions to extend, modify and refine those inferred from earlier analyses. Directed placement of transposase subunits at their cognate sub-sites at L and R, analysis of the protein composition of transpososomes thus obtained, and their characterization using topological methods define the following interactions. R1-E interaction is essential to promote transpososome assembly, R3-E interaction contributes to the native topology of the transpososome, and L1-E and R2-E interactions are not required for assembly. The data on L2-E and L3-E interactions are not unequivocal. If they do occur, either one is sufficient to support the assembly process. Our results are consistent with two R-E and perhaps one L-E, being responsible for the three DNA crossings between the enhancer and the left and right ends of Mu. A 3D representation of the interwrapped complex (IW) obtained by modeling is consistent with these results. The model reveals straightforward geometric and topological relationships between the IW complex and a more relaxed enhancer-independent V-form of the transpososome assembled under altered reaction conditions.

Retrotransposon suicide: formation of Ty1 circles and autointegration via a central DNA flap

Despite their evolutionary distance, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae retrotransposon Ty1 and retroviruses use similar strategies for replication, integration, and interactions with their hosts. Here we examine the formation of circular Ty1 DNA, which is comparable to the dead-end circular products that arise during retroviral infection. Appreciable levels of circular Ty1 DNA are present with one-long terminal repeat (LTR) circles and deleted circles comprising major classes, while two-LTR circles are enriched when integration is defective. One-LTR circles persist when homologous recombination pathways are blocked by mutation, suggesting that they result from reverse transcription. Ty1 autointegration events readily occur, and many are coincident with and dependent upon DNA flap structures that result from DNA synthesis initiated at the central polypurine tract. These results suggest that Ty1-specific mechanisms minimize copy number and raise the possibility that special DNA structures are a targeting determinant.

Complete genomic sequence of bacteriophage B3, a Mu-like phage of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Bacteriophage B3 is a transposable phage of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In this report, we present the complete DNA sequence and annotation of the B3 genome. DNA sequence analysis revealed that the B3 genome is 38,439 bp long with a G+C content of 63.3%. The genome contains 59 proposed open reading frames (ORFs) organized into at least three operons. Of these ORFs, the predicted proteins from 41 ORFs (68%) display significant similarity to other phage or bacterial proteins. Many of the predicted B3 proteins are homologous to those encoded by the early genes and head genes of Mu and Mu-like prophages found in sequenced bacterial genomes. Only two of the predicted B3 tail proteins are homologous to other well-characterized phage tail proteins; however, several Mu-like prophages and transposable phage D3112 encode approximately 10 highly similar proteins in their predicted tail gene regions. Comparison of the B3 genomic organization with that of Mu revealed evidence of multiple genetic rearrangements, the most notable being the inversion of the proposed B3 immunity/early gene region, the loss of Mu-like tail genes, and an extreme leftward shift of the B3 DNA modification gene cluster. These differences illustrate and support the widely held view that tailed phages are genetic mosaics arising by the exchange of functional modules within a diverse genetic pool.

Alternative interactions between the Tn7 transposase and the Tn7 target DNA binding protein regulate target immunity and transposition

The Tn7 transposon avoids inserting into a target DNA that contains a pre-existing copy of Tn7. This phenomenon, known as 'target immunity', is established when TnsB, a Tn7 transposase subunit, binds to Tn7 sequences in the target DNA and mediates displacement of TnsC, a critical transposase activator, from the DNA. Paradoxically, TnsB-TnsC interactions are also required to promote transposon insertion. We have probed Tn7 target immunity by isolating TnsB mutants that mediate more frequent insertions into a potentially immune target DNA because they fail to provoke dissociation of TnsC from the DNA. We show that a single region of TnsB mediates the TnsB-TnsC interaction that underlies both target immunity and transposition, but that TnsA, the other transposase subunit, channels the TnsB-TnsC interaction toward transposition.

Reorganization of the Mu transpososome active sites during a cooperative transition between DNA cleavage and joining

Transposition of mobile genetic elements proceeds through a series of DNA phosphoryl transfer reactions, with multiple reaction steps catalyzed by the same set of active site residues. Mu transposase repeatedly utilizes the same active site DDE residues to cleave and join a single DNA strand at each transposon end to a new, distant DNA location (the target DNA). To better understand how DNA is manipulated within the Mu transposase-DNA complex during recombination, the impact of the DNA immediately adjacent to the Mu DNA ends (the flanking DNA) on the progress of transposition was investigated. We show that, in the absence of the MuB activator, the 3 '-flanking strand can slow one or more steps between DNA cleavage and joining. The presence of this flanking DNA strand in just one active site slows the joining step in both active sites. Further evidence suggests that this slow step is not due to a change in the affinity of the transpososome for the target DNA. Finally, we demonstrate that MuB activates transposition by stimulating the reaction step between cleavage and joining that is otherwise slowed by this flanking DNA strand. Based on these results, we propose that the 3 '-flanking DNA strand must be removed from, or shifted within, both active sites after the cleavage step; this movement is coupled to a conformational change within the transpososome that properly positions the target DNA simultaneously within both active sites and thereby permits joining.

Effect of mutations in the C-terminal domain of Mu B on DNA binding and interactions with Mu A transposase

Bacteriophage Mu transposition requires two phage-encoded proteins, the transposase, Mu A, and an accessory protein, Mu B. Mu B is an ATP-dependent DNA-binding protein that is required for target capture and target immunity and is an allosteric activator of transpososome function. The recent NMR structure of the C-terminal domain of Mu B (Mu B223-312) revealed that there is a patch of positively charged residues on the solvent-exposed surface. This patch may be responsible for the nonspecific DNA binding activity displayed by the purified Mu B223-312 peptide. We show that mutations of three lysine residues within this patch completely abolish nonspecific DNA binding of the C-terminal peptide (Mu B223- 312). To determine how this DNA binding activity affects transposition we mutated these lysine residues in the full-length protein. The full-length protein carrying all three mutations was deficient in both strand transfer and allosteric activation of transpososome function but retained ATPase activity. Peptide binding studies also revealed that this patch of basic residues within the C-terminal domain of Mu B is within a region of the protein that interacts directly with Mu A. Thus, we conclude that this protein segment contributes to both DNA binding and protein-protein contacts with the Mu transposase.

Mu transpososome architecture ensures that unfolding by ClpX or proteolysis by ClpXP remodels but does not destroy the complex

The Clp/Hsp100 ATPases are protein unfoldases that both alter protein conformation and target proteins for degradation. An unresolved question has been how such seemingly destructive enzymes can "remodel" some protein substrates rather than destroy them. Here, we investigate the products of ClpX-mediated remodeling of a hyper-stable protein-DNA complex, the Mu transpososome. We find that although an oligomeric complex is maintained, release of some subunits accompanies ClpX action. Replacement of transposase's endogenous ClpX-recognition sequence with an exogenous signal reveals that the mechanism of remodeling is independent of both the recognition signal and the identity of the unfoldase. Finally, examination of the transposase-DNA contacts reveals only a localized region that is altered during remodeling. These results provide a framework for protein remodeling, wherein the physical attributes of a complex can limit the unfolding activity of its remodeler.

Direct observation of single MuB polymers: evidence for a DNA-dependent conformational change for generating an active target complex

MuB, an ATP-dependent DNA binding protein, is critical for selection of target sites on the host chromosome during Mu transposition. We have developed a system for observing the behavior of single MuB polymers bound to an immobilized molecule of DNA. We show that the individual polymers display a broad distribution of disassembly rates and exhibit regional variations in DNA binding. Additionally, ATP hydrolysis was obligatorily coupled to dissociation of MuB subunits from the DNA during polymer disassembly. We propose a model in which the formation of an active target complex is mediated by a conformational change within the MuB polymer that is influenced by the sequence of the DNA.

Dynamics of a protein polymer: the assembly and disassembly pathways of the MuB transposition target complex

MuB assembles into a polymer on DNA in the presence of ATP and is directly involved in the selection of an appropriate site on the Escherichia coli chromosome for the insertion of the bacteriophage Mu genome. We have developed an assay using fluorescently tagged proteins to monitor the polymeric state of MuB via fluorescence resonance energy transfer. We show that polymer assembly is initiated by the formation of an ATP-MuB complex. MuB then self-associates into a protomer before binding to DNA. Upon binding to DNA, a dramatic increase in energy transfer is observed, suggesting a conformational change within MuB. Polymer disassembly is much slower than assembly and is greatly stimulated by the MuA transposase. Additionally, MuB is readily exchanged between polymers, and ATP hydrolysis is directly coupled to polymer disassembly. Our data support a model in which a combination of rapid polymer assembly, MuA-mediated disassembly, followed by rapid reassembly of the polymer allows MuB to sample multiple DNA targets until an appropriate site is located for the insertion of the bacteriophage genome.

Sequence and positional requirements for DNA sites in a mu transpososome

Transposition of bacteriophage Mu uses two DNA cleavage sites and six transposase recognition sites, with each recognition site divided into two half-sites. The recognition sites can activate transposition of non-Mu DNA sequences if a complete set of Mu sequences is not available. We have analyzed 18 sequences from a non-Mu DNA molecule, selected in a functional assay for the ability to be transposed by MuA transposase. These sequences are remarkably diverse. Nonetheless, when viewed as a group they resemble a Mu DNA end, with a cleavage site and a single recognition site. Analysis of these "pseudo-Mu ends" indicates that most positions in the cleavage and recognition sites contribute sequence-specific information that helps drive transposition, though only the strongest contributors are apparent from mutagenesis data. The sequence analysis also suggests variability in the alignment of recognition half-sites. Transposition assays of specifically designed DNA substrates support the conclusion that the transposition machinery is flexible enough to permit variability in half-site spacing and also perhaps variability in the placement of the recognition site with respect to the cleavage site. This variability causes only local perturbations in the protein-DNA complex, as indicated by experiments in which altered and unaltered DNA substrates are paired.

DNA recognition sites activate MuA transposase to perform transposition of non-Mu DNA

Mu transposition occurs within a large protein-DNA complex called a transpososome. This stable complex includes four subunits of MuA transposase, each contacting a 22-base pair recognition site located near an end of the transposon DNA. These MuA recognition sites are critical for assembling the transpososome. Here we report that when concentrations of Mu DNA are limited, the MuA recognition sites permit assembly of transpososomes in which non-Mu DNA substitutes for some of the Mu sequences. These "hybrid" transpososomes are stable to competitor DNA, actively transpose the non-Mu DNA, and produce transposition products that had been previously observed but not explained. The strongest activator of non-Mu transposition is a DNA fragment containing two MuA recognition sites and no cleavage site, but a shorter fragment with just one recognition site is sufficient. Based on our results, we propose that MuA recognition sites drive assembly of functional transpososomes in two complementary ways. Multiple recognition sites help physically position MuA subunits in the transpososome plus each individual site allosterically activates transposase.

DNA transposition of bacteriophage Mu. A quantitative analysis of target site selection in vitro

The Mu transpositional DNA recombination machinery selects target sites by assembling a protein-DNA complex that interacts with the target DNA and reacts whenever it locates a favorable sequence composition. Splicing of a transposon into the target generates a 5-bp duplication that reflects the original target site. Preferential usage of different target pentamers was examined with a minimal Mu in vitro system and quantitatively compiled consensus sequences for the most preferred and the least preferred sites were generated. When analyzed as base steps, preferences toward certain steps along the 5-bp target site were detected. We further show that insertion sites can be predicted on the basis of additively calculated base step values. Also surrounding sequences influence the preference of a given pentamer; a symmetrical structural component was revealed, suggesting potential hinges at and around the target site.

Tn7: smarter than we thought

A notable feature of transposable elements--segments of DNA that can move from one position to another in genomes--is that they are highly prevalent, despite the fact that their translocation can result in mutation. The bacterial transposon Tn7 uses an elaborate system of target-site selection pathways that favours the dispersal of Tn7 in diverse hosts as well as minimizing its negative effects.

Effect of mutations in the Mu-host junction region on transpososome assembly

Mu transposition occurs through a series of higher-order nucleoprotein complexes called transpososomes. The region where the Mu DNA joins the host DNA plays an integral role in the assembly of these transpososomes. We have created a series of point mutations at the Mu-host junction and characterized their effect on the Mu in vitro strand transfer reaction. Analysis of these mutant constructs revealed an inhibition in transpososome assembly at the point in the reaction pathway when the junction region is engaged by the transposase active site (i.e. the transition from LER to type 0). We found that the degree of inhibition was dependent upon the particular base-pair change at each position and whether the substitution occurred at the left or right transposon end. The MuB transposition protein, an allosteric effector of MuA, was shown to suppress all of the inhibitory Mu-host junction mutants. Most of the mutant constructs were also suppressed, to varying degrees, by the substitution of Mg(2+) with Mn(2+). Analysis of the mutant constructs has revealed hierarchical nucleotide preferences at positions -1 through +3 for transpososome assembly and suggests the possibility that specific metal ion-DNA base interactions are involved in DNA recognition and transpososome assembly.

Differential role of the Mu B protein in phage Mu integration vs. replication: mechanistic insights into two transposition pathways

The Mu B protein is an ATP-dependent DNA-binding protein and an allosteric activator of the Mu transposase. As a result of these activities, Mu B is instrumental in efficient transposition and target-site choice. We analysed in vivo the role of Mu B in the two different recombination reactions performed by phage Mu: non-replicative transposition, the pathway used during integration, and replicative transposition, the pathway used during lytic growth. Utilizing a sensitive PCR-based assay for Mu transposition, we found that Mu B is not required for integration, but enhances the rate and extent of the process. Furthermore, three different mutant versions of Mu B, Mu BC99Y, Mu BK106A, and Mu B1-294, stimulate integration to a similar level as the wild-type protein. In contrast, these mutant proteins fail to support Mu growth. This deficiency is attributable to a defect in formation of an essential intermediate for replicative transposition. Biochemical analysis of the Mu B mutant proteins reveals common features: the mutants retain the ability to stimulate transposase, but are defective in DNA binding and target DNA delivery. These data indicate that activation of transposase by Mu B is sufficient for robust non-replicative transposition. Efficient replicative transposition, however, demands that the Mu B protein not only activate transposase, but also bind and deliver the target DNA.

Analysis of gain-of-function mutants of an ATP-dependent regulator of Tn7 transposition

The bacterial transposon Tn7 is distinguished by its unusual discrimination among targets, being particularly attracted to certain target DNA and actively avoiding other DNA. Tn7 transposition is mediated by the interaction of two alternative transposon-encoded target selection proteins, TnsD and TnsE, with a common core transposition machinery composed of the transposase (TnsAB) and an ATP-dependent DNA-binding protein TnsC. No transposition is observed with wild-type TnsABC. Here, we analyze the properties of two gain-of-function TnsC mutants that allow transposition in the absence of TnsD or TnsE. We find that these TnsC mutants have altered interactions with ATP and DNA that can account for their gain-of-function phenotype. We also show that TnsC is an ATPase and that it directly interacts with the TnsAB transposase. This work provides strong support to the view that TnsC and its ATP state are central to the control of Tn7 transposition.

Domain III function of Mu transposase analysed by directed placement of subunits within the transpososome

Assembly of the functional tetrameric form of Mu transposase (MuA protein) at the two att ends of Mu depends on interaction of MuA with multiple att and enhancer sites on supercoiled DNA, and is stimulated by MuB protein. The N-terminal domain I of MuA harbours distinct regions for interaction with the att ends and enhancer; the C-terminal domain III contains separate regions essential for tetramer assembly and interaction with MuB protein (IIIalpha and IIIbeta, respectively). Although the central domain II (the 'DDE' domain) of MuA harbours the known catalytic DDE residues, a 26 amino acid peptide within IIIalpha also has a non-specific DNA binding and nuclease activity which has been implicated in catalysis. One model proposes that active sites for Mu transposition are assembled by sharing structural/catalytic residues between domains II and III present on separate MuA monomers within the MuA tetramer. We have used substrates with altered att sites and mixtures of MuA proteins with either wild-type or altered att DNA binding specificities, to create tetrameric arrangements wherein specific MuA subunits are nonfunctional in II, IIIalpha or IIIbeta domains. From the ability of these oriented tetramers to carry out DNA cleavage and strand transfer we conclude that domain IIIalpha or IIIbeta function is not unique to a specific subunit within the tetramer, indicative of a structural rather than a catalytic function for domain III in Mu transposition.

Towards integrating vectors for gene therapy: expression of functional bacteriophage MuA and MuB proteins in mammalian cells

Bacteriophage Mu has one of the best studied, most efficient and largest transposition machineries of the prokaryotic world. To harness this attractive integration machinery for use in mammalian cells, we cloned the coding sequences of the phage factors MuA and MuB in a eukaryotic expression cassette and fused them to a FLAG epitope and a SV40-derived nuclear localization signal. We demonstrate that these N-terminal extensions were sufficient to target the Mu proteins to the nucleus, while their function in Escherichia coli was not impeded. In vivo transposition in mammalian cells was analysed by co-transfection of the MuA and MuB expression vectors with a donor construct, which contained a miniMu transposon carrying a Hygromycin-resistance marker (Hyg(R)). In all co-transfections, a significant but moderate (up to 2.7-fold) increase in Hyg(R) colonies was obtained if compared with control experiments in which the MuA vector was omitted. To study whether the increased efficiency was the result of bona fide Mu transposition, integrated vector copies were cloned from 43 monoclonal and one polyclonal cell lines. However, in none of these clones, the junction between the vector and the chromosomal DNA was localized precisely at the border of the Att sites. From our data we conclude that expression of MuA and MuB increases the integration of miniMu vectors in mammalian cells, but that this increase is not the result of bona fide Mu-induced transposition.

The solution structure of the C-terminal domain of the Mu B transposition protein

Mu B is one of four proteins required for the strand transfer step of bacteriophage Mu DNA transposition and the only one where no high resolution structural data is available. Structural work on Mu B has been hampered primarily by solubility problems and its tendency to aggregate. We have overcome this problem by determination of the three-dimensional structure of the C-terminal domain of Mu B (B(223-312)) in 1.5 M NaCl using NMR spectroscopic methods. The structure of Mu B(223-312) comprises four helices (backbone r.m.s.d. 0.46 A) arranged in a loosely packed bundle and resembles that of the N-terminal region of the replication helicase, DnaB. This structural motif is likely to be involved in the inter-domainal regulation of ATPase activity for both Mu A and DnaB. The approach described here for structural determination in high salt may be generally applicable for proteins that do not crystallize and that are plagued by solubility problems at low ionic strength.

Integrating DNA: transposases and retroviral integrases

Transposable elements appear quite disparate in their organization and in the types of genetic rearrangements they promote. In spite of this diversity, retroviruses and many transposons of both prokaryotes and eukaryotes show clear similarities in the chemical reactions involved in their transposition. This is reflected in the enzymes, integrases and transposases, that catalyze these reactions and that are essential for the mobility of the elements. In this chapter, we examine the structure-function relationships between these enzymes and the different ways in which the individual steps are assembled to produce a complete transposition cycle.

Phage Mu transposition immunity reflects supercoil domain structure of the chromosome

Transposition immunity is the negative influence that the presence of one transposon sequence has on the probability of a second identical element inserting in the same site or in sites nearby. A transposition-defective Mu derivative (MudJr1) produced transposition immunity in both directions from one insertion point in the Salmonella typhimurium chromosome. To control for the sequence preference of Mu transposition proteins, Tn10 elements were introduced as targets at various distances from an immunity-conferring MudJr1 element. Mu transposition into a Tn10 target was not detectable when the distance of separation from MudJr1 was 5 kb, and transposition was unencumbered when the separation was 25 kb. Between 5 kb and 25 kb, immunity decayed gradually with distance. Immunity decayed more sharply in a gyrase mutant than in a wild-type strain. We propose that Mu transposition immunity senses the domain structure of bacterial chromosomes.

Starvation-induced Mucts62-mediated coding sequence fusion: a role for ClpXP, Lon, RpoS and Crp

The formation of araB-lacZ coding sequence fusions in Escherichia coli is a particular type of chromosomal rearrangement induced by Mucts62, a thermoinducible mutant of mutator phage Mu. Fusion formation is controlled by the host physiology. It only occurs after aerobic carbon starvation and requires the phage-encoded transposase pA, suggesting that these growth conditions trigger induction of the Mucts62 prophage. Here, we show that thermal induction of the prophage accelerated araB-lacZ fusion formation, confirming that derepression is a rate-limiting step in the fusion process. Nonetheless, starvation conditions remained essential to complete fusions, suggesting additional levels of physiological regulation. Using a transcriptional fusion indicator system in which the Mu early lytic promoter is fused to the reporter E. coli lacZ gene, we confirmed that the Mucts62 prophage was derepressed in stationary phase (S derepression) at low temperature. S derepression did not apply to prophages that expressed the Mu wild-type repressor. It depended upon the host ClpXP and Lon ATP-dependent proteases and the RpoS stationary phase-specific sigma factor, but not upon Crp. None of these four functions was required for thermal induction. Crp was required for fusion formation, but only when the Mucts62 prophage encoded the transposition/replication activating protein pB. Finally, we found that thermally induced cultures did not return to the repressed state when shifted back to low temperature and, hence, remained activated for accelerated fusion formation upon starvation. The maintenance of the derepressed state required the ClpXP and Lon host proteases and the prophage Ner-regulatory protein. These observations illustrate how the cts62 mutation in Mu repressor provides the prophage with a new way to respond to growth phase-specific regulatory signals and endows the host cell with a new potential for adaptation through the controlled use of the phage transposition machinery.

Target joining of duplicated insertion sequence IS21 is assisted by IstB protein in vitro

Tandemly repeated insertion sequence IS21, located on a suicide plasmid, promoted replicon fusion with bacteriophage lambda in vitro in the presence of ATP. This reaction was catalyzed in a cell extract containing the 45-kDa IstA protein (cointegrase) and the 30-kDa IstB helper protein of IS21 after both proteins had been overproduced in Escherichia coli. Without IstB, replicon fusion was inefficient and did not produce the 4-bp target duplications typical of IS21.

Mobile DNA elements: controlling transposition with ATP-dependent molecular switches

Nucleotide-binding proteins are often used as molecular switches to control the assembly or activity of macromolecular machines. Recent work has revealed that such molecular switches also regulate the spread of some mobile DNA elements. Bacteriophage Mu and the bacterial transposon Tn7 each use an ATP-dependent molecular switch to select a new site for insertion and to coordinate the assembly of the transposition machinery at that site. Strong parallels between these ATP-dependent transposition proteins and other well-characterized molecular switches, such as Ras and EF-Tu, have emerged.

Mutational analysis of the Mu transposase. Contributions of two distinct regions of domain II to recombination

Mu transposase is a member of a protein family that includes many transposases and the retroviral integrases. These recombinases catalyze the DNA cleavage and joining reactions essential for transpositional recombination. Here we demonstrate that, consistent with structural predictions, aspartate 336 of Mu transposase is required for catalysis of both DNA cleavage and DNA joining. This residue, although located 55 rather than 35 residues NH2-terminal of the essential glutamate, is undoubtedly the analog of the second aspartate of the Asp-Asp-35-Glu motif found in other family members. The core domain of Mu transposase consists of two subdomains: the NH2-terminal subdomain (IIA) contains the conserved Asp-Asp-Glu motif residues, whereas the smaller COOH-terminal subdomain (IIB) contains a large positively charged region exposed on its surface. To probe the function of domain IIB, we constructed mutant proteins carrying deletion or substitution mutations within this region. The activity of the deletion proteins revealed that domains IIA and IIB can be provided by different subunits in the transposase tetramer. Substitution mutations at two pairs of exposed lysine residues within the positively charged surface of domain IIB render transposase defective in transposition at a reaction step after DNA cleavage but prior to DNA joining. The severity of this defect depends on the structure of the DNA flanking the cleavage site. Thus, these data suggest that domain IIB is involved in manipulating the DNA near the cleavage site and that this function is important during the transition between the DNA cleavage and the DNA joining steps of recombination.