The progesterone antagonist RU486 acquires agonist activity upon stimulation of cAMP signaling pathways

Steroid profile in patients with breast cancer and in mice treated with mifepristone

Progesterone receptors (PRs) are biomarkers used as prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer, but they are still not used as therapeutic targets. We have proposed that the ratio between PR isoforms A and B (PRA and PRB) predicts antiprogestin responsiveness. The MIPRA trial confirmed the benefit of 200 mg mifepristone, administered to patients with tumors with a high PRA/PRB ratio, but dose-ranging has not been conducted. The aim of this study was to establish the plasma mifepristone levels of patients from the MIPRA trial, along with the resultant steroid profiles, and compare these with those observed in mifepristone-treated mice using therapeutic schemes able to induce the regression of experimental mammary carcinomas with high PRA/PRB ratios: 6 mg pellets implanted subcutaneously, or daily doses of 12 mg/kg body weight. The plasma levels of mifepristone and other 19 plasma steroids were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectometry. In mifepristone-treated mice, plasma levels were lower than those registered in mifepristone-treated patients (i.e. day 7 after treatment initiation, pellet-treated mice: 8.4 ± 3.9 ng/mL; mifepristone-treated patients: 300.3 ± 31.7 ng/mL (mean ± s.d.; P < 0.001)). The increase in corticoid related steroids observed in patients was not observed in mifepristone-treated mice. The increase in progesterone levels was the most significant side effect detected in mifepristone-treated mice after 14 or 21 days of treatment, probably due to an ovarian compensatory effect not observed in postmenopausal patients. We conclude that in future clinical trials using mifepristone, the possibility of lowering the standard daily dose of 200 mg should be considered.

Luteotropic and Luteolytic Factors Modulate the Expression of Nuclear Receptor Coregulators in Bovine Luteal Cells Independently of Histone Acetyltransferase and Histone Deacetylase Activities

The aims of this study were to examine the effect of luteotropic and luteolytic factors on the mRNA and protein expression of the coactivators HAT: histone acetyltransferase p300 (P300), cyclic adenosine monophosphate response element-binding protein (CREB), and steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1) and the corepressor: nuclear receptor corepressor-2 (NCOR-2) in bovine luteal cells on days 6-10 and 16-20. HAT and HDAC activities were also measured. The obtained results showed that luteotropic and luteolytic factors influence changes in the mRNA and protein levels of the coregulators of PGRs. However, they did not affect the activity of related HAT and HDAC, respectively. Therefore, it is possible that these factors, through changes in the expression of nuclear receptor coactivators and corepressors, may affect the functioning of the nuclear receptors, including PGRs, in the bovine CL.

Comparison of mechanisms of angiostasis caused by the anti-inflammatory steroid 5α-tetrahydrocorticosterone versus conventional glucocorticoids

5α-Tetrahydrocorticosterone (5αTHB) is an effective topical anti-inflammatory agent in mouse, with less propensity to cause skin thinning and impede new blood vessel growth compared with corticosterone. Its anti-inflammatory effects were not prevented by RU38486, a glucocorticoid receptor antagonist, suggesting alternative mechanisms. The hypothesis that 5αTHB directly inhibits angiogenesis to a lesser extent than hydrocortisone was tested, focussing on glucocorticoid receptor mediated actions. New vessel growth from aortae from C57BL/6 male mice was monitored in culture, in the presence of 5αTHB, hydrocortisone (mixed glucocorticoid/mineralocorticoid receptor agonist) or the selective glucocorticoid receptor agonist dexamethasone. Transcript profiles were studied, as was the role of the glucocorticoid receptor, using the antagonist, RU38486. Ex vivo, 5αTHB suppressed vessel growth from aortic rings, but was less potent than hydrocortisone (EC50 2512 nM 5αTHB, versus 762 nM hydrocortisone). In contrast to conventional glucocorticoids, 5αTHB did not alter expression of genes related to extracellular matrix integrity or inflammatory signalling, but caused a small increase in Per1 transcript, and decreased transcript abundance of Pecam1 gene. RU38486 did not antagonise the residual effects of 5αTHB to suppress vessel growth or regulate gene expression, but modified effects of dexamethasone. 5αTHB did not alter expression of glucocorticoid-regulated genes Fkbp51 and Hsd11b1, unlike hydrocortisone and dexamethasone. In conclusion, compared with hydrocortisone, 5αTHB exhibits limited suppression of angiogenesis, at least directly in blood vessels and probably independent of the glucocorticoid receptor. Discriminating the mechanisms employed by 5αTHB may provide the basis for the development of novel safer anti-inflammatory drugs for topical use.

Membrane-Initiated Estrogen, Androgen, and Progesterone Receptor Signaling in Health and Disease

Rapid effects of steroid hormones were discovered in the early 1950s, but the subject was dominated in the 1970s by discoveries of estradiol and progesterone stimulating protein synthesis. This led to the paradigm that steroid hormones regulate growth, differentiation, and metabolism via binding a receptor in the nucleus. It took 30 years to appreciate not only that some cellular functions arise solely from membrane-localized steroid receptor (SR) actions, but that rapid sex steroid signaling from membrane-localized SRs is a prerequisite for the phosphorylation, nuclear import, and potentiation of the transcriptional activity of nuclear SR counterparts. Here, we provide a review and update on the current state of knowledge of membrane-initiated estrogen (ER), androgen (AR) and progesterone (PR) receptor signaling, the mechanisms of membrane-associated SR potentiation of their nuclear SR homologues, and the importance of this membrane-nuclear SR collaboration in physiology and disease. We also highlight potential clinical implications of pathway-selective modulation of membrane-associated SR.

Progesterone Receptors Promote Quiescence and Ovarian Cancer Cell Phenotypes via DREAM in p53-Mutant Fallopian Tube Models

CONTEXT

The ability of ovarian steroids to modify ovarian cancer (OC) risk remains controversial. Progesterone is considered to be protective; recent studies indicate no effect or enhanced OC risk. Knowledge of progesterone receptor (PR) signaling during altered physiology that typifies OC development is limited.

OBJECTIVE

This study defines PR-driven oncogenic signaling mechanisms in p53-mutant human fallopian tube epithelia (hFTE), a precursor of the most aggressive OC subtype.

METHODS

PR expression in clinical samples of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) lesions and high-grade serous OC (HGSC) tumors was analyzed. Novel PR-A and PR-B isoform-expressing hFTE models were characterized for gene expression and cell cycle progression, emboli formation, and invasion. PR regulation of the DREAM quiescence complex and DYRK1 kinases was established.

RESULTS

STICs and HGSC express abundant activated phospho-PR. Progestin promoted reversible hFTE cell cycle arrest, spheroid formation, and invasion. RNAseq/biochemical studies revealed potent ligand-independent/-dependent PR actions, progestin-induced regulation of the DREAM quiescence complex, and cell cycle target genes through enhanced complex formation and chromatin recruitment. Disruption of DREAM/DYRK1s by pharmacological inhibition, HPV E6/E7 expression, or DYRK1A/B depletion blocked progestin-induced cell arrest and attenuated PR-driven gene expression and associated OC phenotypes.

CONCLUSION

Activated PRs support quiescence and pro-survival/pro-dissemination cell behaviors that may contribute to early HGSC progression. Our data support an alternative perspective on the tenet that progesterone always confers protection against OC. STICs can reside undetected for decades prior to invasive disease; our studies reveal clinical opportunities to prevent the ultimate development of HGSC by targeting PRs, DREAM, and/or DYRKs.

The interaction between protein kinase A and progesterone on basal and inflammation-induced myometrial oxytocin receptor expression

Our previous work has shown myometrial PKA activity declines in term and twin-preterm labour in association with an increase in the expression of the oxytocin receptor (OTR). Here we investigate the action of cAMP/PKA in basal conditions, with the addition of progesterone (P4) and/or IL-1β to understand how cAMP/PKA acts to maintain pregnancy and whether the combination of cAMP and P4 would be a viable therapeutic combination for the prevention of preterm labour (PTL). Further, given that we have previously found that cAMP enhances P4 action we wanted to test the hypothesis that changes in the cAMP effector system are responsible for the functional withdrawal of myometrial P4 action. Myometrial cells were grown from biopsies obtained from women at the time of elective Caesarean section before the onset of labour. The addition of forskolin, an adenylyl cyclase activator, repressed basal OTR mRNA levels at all doses and P4 only enhanced this effect at its highest dose. Forskolin repressed the IL-1β-induced increase in OTR mRNA and protein levels in a PKA-dependent fashion and repressed IL-1β-activation and nuclear transfer of NFκB and AP-1. P4 had similar effects and the combination P4 and forskolin had greater effects on OTR and NFκB than forskolin alone. While PKA knockdown had no effect on the ability of P4 to repress IL-1β-induced OTR expression it reversed the repressive effect of the combination of P4 and forskolin and resulted in a greater increase than observed with IL-1β alone. These studies suggest that cAMP acts via PKA to repress inflammation-driven OTR expression, but that when PKA activity is reduced, the combination of cAMP and P4 actually enhances the OTR response to inflammation, promoting the onset of labour and suggesting that changes in the cAMP effector system can induce a functional P4 withdrawal.

Dopamine-induced interactions of female mouse hypothalamic proteins with progestin receptor-A in the absence of hormone

Neural progestin receptors (PR) function in reproduction, neural development, neuroprotection, learning, memory and the anxiety response. In the absence of progestins, PR can be activated by dopamine (DA) in the rodent hypothalamus to elicit female sexual behaviour. The present study investigated mechanisms of DA activation of PR by testing the hypothesis that proteins from DA-treated hypothalami interact with PR in the absence of progestins. Ovariectomised, oestradiol-primed mice were infused with a D1-receptor agonist, SKF38393 (SKF), into the third ventricle 30 minutes prior to death. Proteins from SKF-treated hypothalami were pulled-down with glutathione S-transferase-tagged mouse PR-A or PR-B and the interactomes were analysed by mass spectrometry. The largest functional group to interact with PR-A in a DA-dependent manner was synaptic proteins. To test the hypothesis that DA activation of PR regulates synaptic proteins, we developed oestradiol-induced PR-expressing hypothalamic-like neurones derived from human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs). Similar to progesterone (P4), SKF treatment of hiPSCs increased synapsin1/2 expression. This SKF-dependent effect was blocked by the PR antagonist RU486, suggesting that PR are necessary for this DA-induced increase. The second largest DA-dependent PR-A protein interactome comprised metabolic regulators involved in glucose metabolism, lipid synthesis and mitochondrial energy production. Interestingly, hypothalamic proteins interacted with PR-A, but not PR-B, in an SKF-dependent manner, suggesting that DA promotes the interaction of multiple hypothalamic proteins with PR-A. These in vivo and in vitro results indicate novel mechanisms by which DA can differentially activate PR isoforms in the absence of P4 and provide a better understanding of ligand-independent PR activation in reproductive, metabolic and mental health disorders in women.

Estrogenic Compounds or Adiponectin Inhibit Cyclic AMP Response to Human Luteinizing Hormone in Mouse Leydig Tumor Cells

Mouse Leydig Tumor cells (mLTC), transiently expressing cAMP-dependent luciferase, were used to study the influence of sexual steroids and of adiponectin (ADPN) on the cAMP response to luteinizing hormones (LH). While testosterone and progesterone had no significant effect, several molecules with estrogenic activity (17β-estradiol, ethynylestradiol, and bisphenol A) provoked a decrease in intracellular cyclic AMP accumulation under 0.7 nM human LH stimulation. Adiponectin exhibited a bimodal dose-effect on LH response: synergistic between 2–125 ng/mL and inhibitory between 0.5–5 µg/mL. In brief, our data indicate that estrogens and ADPN separately exert rapid (<1 h) inhibitory and/or synergistic effects on cAMP response to LH in mLTC-1 cells. As the inhibitory effect of each estrogenic molecule was observed after only 1-h preincubation, it might be mediated through the G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) membrane receptor, but this remains to be demonstrated. The synergistic effect with low concentrations of ADPN with human Luteinizing Hormone (hLH) was observed with both fresh and frozen/thawed ADPN. In contrast, the inhibitory effect with high concentrations of ADPN was lost with frozen/thawed ADPN, suggesting deterioration of its polymeric structure.

Progesterone-Related Immune Modulation of Pregnancy and Labor

Pregnancy involves a complex interplay between maternal neuroendocrine and immunological systems in order to establish and sustain a growing fetus. It is thought that the uterus at pregnancy transitions from quiescent to laboring state in response to interactions between maternal and fetal systems at least partly via altered neuroendocrine signaling. Progesterone (P4) is a vital hormone in maternal reproductive tissues and immune cells during pregnancy. As such, P4 is widely used in clinical interventions to improve the chance of embryo implantation, as well as reduce the risk of miscarriage and premature labor. Here we review research to date that focus on the pathways through which P4 mediates its actions on both the maternal reproductive and immune system. We will dissect the role of P4 as a modulator of inflammation, both systemic and intrinsic to the uterus, during human pregnancy and labor.

Progesterone and cAMP synergize to inhibit responsiveness of myometrial cells to pro-inflammatory/pro-labor stimuli

Progesterone (P4) acting through the P4 receptor (PR) isoforms, PR-A and PR-B, promotes uterine quiescence for most of pregnancy, in part, by inhibiting the response of myometrial cells to pro-labor inflammatory stimuli. This anti-inflammatory effect is inhibited by phosphorylation of PR-A at serine-344 and -345 (pSer^344/345-PRA). Activation of the cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) signaling pathway also promotes uterine quiescence and myometrial relaxation. This study examined the cross-talk between P4/PR and cAMP signaling to exert anti-inflammatory actions and control pSer^344/345-PRA generation in myometrial cells. In the hTERT-HM^A/B immortalized human myometrial cell line P4 inhibited responsiveness to interleukin (IL)-1β and forskolin (increases cAMP) and 8-Br-cAMP increased this effect in a concentration-dependent and synergistic manner that was mediated by activation of protein kinase A (PKA). Forskolin also inhibited the generation of pSer^344/345-PRA and expression of key contraction-associated genes. Generation of pSer^344/345-PRA was catalyzed by stress-activated protein kinase/c-Jun NH₂-terminal kinase (SAPK/JNK). Forskolin inhibited pSer^344/345-PRA generation, in part, by increasing the expression of dual specificity protein phosphatase 1 (DUSP1), a phosphatase that inactivates mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) including SAPK/JNK. P4/PR and forskolin increased DUSP1 expression. The data suggest that P4/PR promotes uterine quiescence via cross-talk and synergy with cAMP/PKA signaling in myometrial cells that involves DUSP1-mediated inhibition of SAPK/JNK activation.

Minireview: Tipping the balance: ligand-independent activation of steroid receptors

Steroid receptors are prototypical ligand-dependent transcription factors and a textbook example for allosteric regulation. According to this canonical model, binding of cognate steroid is an absolute requirement for transcriptional activation. Remarkably, the simple one ligand-one receptor model could not be farther from the truth. Steroid receptors, notably the sex steroid receptors, can receive multiple inputs. Activation of steroid receptors by other signals, working through their own signaling pathways, in the absence of the cognate steroids, represents the most extreme form of signaling cross talk. Compared with cognate steroids, ligand-independent activation pathways produce similar but not identical outputs. Here we review the phenomena and discuss what is known about the underlying molecular mechanisms and the biological significance. We hypothesize that steroid receptors may have evolved to be trigger happy. In addition to their cognate steroids, many posttranslational modifications and interactors, modulated by other signals, may be able to tip the balance.

Progestin and antiprogestin responsiveness in breast cancer is driven by the PRA/PRB ratio via AIB1 or SMRT recruitment to the CCND1 and MYC promoters

There is emerging interest in understanding the role of progesterone receptors (PRs) in breast cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the proliferative effect of progestins and antiprogestins depending on the relative expression of the A (PRA) and B (PRB) isoforms of PR. In mifepristone (MFP)-resistant murine carcinomas antiprogestin responsiveness was restored by re-expressing PRA using demethylating agents and histone deacetylase inhibitors. Consistently, in two human breast cancer xenograft models, one manipulated to overexpress PRA or PRB (IBH-6 cells), and the other expressing only PRA (T47D-YA) or PRB (T47D-YB), MFP selectively inhibited the growth of PRA-overexpressing tumors and stimulated IBH-6-PRB xenograft growth. Furthermore, in cells with high or equimolar PRA/PRB ratios, which are stimulated to proliferate in vitro by progestins, and are inhibited by MFP, MPA increased the interaction between PR and the coactivator AIB1, and MFP favored the interaction between PR and the corepressor SMRT. In a PRB-dominant context in which MFP stimulates and MPA inhibits cell proliferation, the opposite interactions were observed. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays in T47D cells in the presence of MPA or MFP confirmed the interactions between PR and the coregulators at the CCND1 and MYC promoters. SMRT downregulation by siRNA abolished the inhibitory effect of MFP on MYC expression and cell proliferation. Our results indicate that antiprogestins are therapeutic tools that selectively inhibit PRA-overexpressing tumors by increasing the SMRT/AIB1 balance at the CCND1 and MYC promoters.

Cyclic AMP enhances progesterone action in human myometrial cells

Cyclic AMP (cAMP) has been shown to promote progesterone and glucocorticoid action in a variety of cellular settings. In this study, we have used human myometrial cells to investigate whether cAMP potentiates the ability of progesterone to repress IL-1β-driven COX-2 expression. We found that forskolin enhanced progesterone-repression of IL-1β-driven COX-2 expression in association with delayed IL-1β-induced nuclear phospho-p65 entry and reduced NF-κB binding to the COX-2 promoter. Further, forskolin enhanced the progesterone-induced expression of FKBP5 and 11βHSD1, progesterone-driven activity of a progesterone response element (PRE) and progesterone receptor (PR)-B binding to a transfected PRE. In addition, forskolin treatment increased PR-B levels and reduced the PR-A:PR-B ratio while acutely decreasing the association between PR and nuclear receptor co-repressor (NCoR) and reducing NCoR levels after 6h. These findings are of importance in situations where enhancing progesterone activity is desirable, for example in the management of endometrial cancer, the promotion of endometrial receptivity or the maintenance of myometrial quiescence during pregnancy.

Phosphorylation: a fundamental regulator of steroid receptor action

Steroid hormone receptors (SHRs) are hormone-activated transcription factors involved in numerous cellular functions and in health and disease. Their activities depend on the cellular level of the receptor, the presence of coregulator proteins, and the cell signaling pathways that are active in the cell. SHRs and their coregulators are phosphorylated on multiple sites by a wide variety of kinases. Each site may contribute to multiple functions and the net effect of an individual phosphorylation depends on the activating kinase. Here we discuss functions of known SHR phosphorylation sites, kinase regulation, evidence of translational relevance, and crosstalk between SHRs and cell signaling pathways. Understanding how cell signaling pathways regulate SHRs might yield novel therapeutic targets for multiple human diseases.

Antiprogestins in breast cancer treatment: are we ready?

Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer death in females worldwide. It is accepted that breast cancer is not a single disease, but instead constitutes a spectrum of tumor subtypes with distinct cellular origins, somatic changes, and etiologies. Molecular gene expression studies have divided breast cancer into several categories, i.e. basal-like, ErbB2 enriched, normal breast-like (adipose tissue gene signature), luminal subtype A, luminal subtype B, and claudin-low. Chances are that as our knowledge increases, each of these types will also be subclassified. More than 66% of breast carcinomas express estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and respond to antiestrogen therapies. Most of these ER+ tumors also express progesterone receptors (PRs), the expression of which has been considered as a reliable marker of a functional ER. In this paper we will review the evidence suggesting that PRs are valid targets for breast cancer therapy. Experimental data suggest that both PR isoforms (A and B) have different roles in breast cancer cell growth, and antiprogestins have already been clinically used in patients who have failed to other therapies. We hypothesize that antiprogestin therapy may be suitable for patients with high levels of PR-A. This paper will go over the experimental evidence of our laboratory and others supporting the use of antiprogestins in selected breast cancer patients.

Genome-wide progesterone receptor binding: cell type-specific and shared mechanisms in T47D breast cancer cells and primary leiomyoma cells

Background

Progesterone, via its nuclear receptor (PR), exerts an overall tumorigenic effect on both uterine fibroid (leiomyoma) and breast cancer tissues, whereas the antiprogestin RU486 inhibits growth of these tissues through an unknown mechanism. Here, we determined the interaction between common or cell-specific genome-wide binding sites of PR and mRNA expression in RU486-treated uterine leiomyoma and breast cancer cells.

Principal Findings

ChIP-sequencing revealed 31,457 and 7,034 PR-binding sites in breast cancer and uterine leiomyoma cells, respectively; 1,035 sites overlapped in both cell types. Based on the chromatin-PR interaction in both cell types, we statistically refined the consensus progesterone response element to G•ACA• • •TGT•C. We identified two striking differences between uterine leiomyoma and breast cancer cells. First, the cis-regulatory elements for HSF, TEF-1, and C/EBPα and β were statistically enriched at genomic RU486/PR-targets in uterine leiomyoma, whereas E2F, FOXO1, FOXA1, and FOXF sites were preferentially enriched in breast cancer cells. Second, 51.5% of RU486-regulated genes in breast cancer cells but only 6.6% of RU486-regulated genes in uterine leiomyoma cells contained a PR-binding site within 5 kb from their transcription start sites (TSSs), whereas 75.4% of RU486-regulated genes contained a PR-binding site farther than 50 kb from their TSSs in uterine leiomyoma cells. RU486 regulated only seven mRNAs in both cell types. Among these, adipophilin (PLIN2), a pro-differentiation gene, was induced via RU486 and PR via the same regulatory region in both cell types.

Conclusions

Our studies have identified molecular components in a RU486/PR-controlled gene network involved in the regulation of cell growth, cell migration, and extracellular matrix function. Tissue-specific and common patterns of genome-wide PR binding and gene regulation may determine the therapeutic effects of antiprogestins in uterine fibroids and breast cancer.

6-arylcoumarins as novel nonsteroidal type progesterone antagonists: an example with receptor-binding-dependent fluorescence

Various 6-arylcoumarin derivatives were designed and synthesized as candidate nonsteroidal type progesterone antagonists. 6-Bromocoumarin derivatives were prepared from the corresponding 4-substituted 2-acetoxy-5-bromobenzaldehyde by employing the Still-Gennari modification of the Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons olefination reaction and were converted to 6-arylcoumarins by means of Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling reactions. The biological activities of these coumarin derivatives were evaluated by means of alkaline phosphatase assay in the T47D human breast carcinoma cell line. Among the synthesized compounds, 36 (IC(50) = 0.12 μM) and 38 (IC(50) = 0.065 μM), bearing a five-membered heterocycle, showed potent PR antagonist activity. Competitive binding assay showed that compounds 8 and 34 have potent PR binding affinity. The fluorescence of compound 8 was dependent on the solvent properties and was increased in the presence of PR ligand binding domain. This property might be applicable to the development of fluorescence probes for studies on PR.

Partial agonist activity of the progesterone receptor antagonist RU486 mediated by an amino-terminal domain coactivator and phosphorylation of serine400

Jun dimerization protein-2 (JDP-2) is a progesterone receptor (PR) coregulatory protein that acts by inducing structure and transcriptional activity in the disordered amino-terminal domain (NTD) of PR. JDP-2 can also potentiate the partial agonist activity of the PR antagonist RU486 by mechanisms that have not been defined. Functional mutagenesis experiments revealed that a subregion of the NTD (amino acids 323-427) was required for the partial agonist activity of RU486 induced by PR interaction with JDP-2. However, this subregion was not required for JDP-2 enhancement of the activity of progestin agonists. Mutation of phosphorylation sites within this region of the NTD showed that phosphorylation of serine 400 was required for the partial agonist activity of RU486 stimulated by JDP-2, but was not required for activity of hormone agonist, either in the presence or absence of JDP-2. Cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (Cdk2)/cyclin A is a novel PR coregulator that binds the NTD and acts by phosphorylating steroid receptor coactivator-1 and modulating steroid receptor coactivator-1 interaction with PR. Cdk2/cyclin A also potentiated the partial agonist activity of RU486; however, phosphorylation of serine 400 was not required, indicating that JDP-2 and Cdk2/cyclin A act by distinct mechanisms. We conclude that PR bound to RU486 and associated with JDP-2 adopts an active conformation in a subregion of the NTD requiring phosphorylation of serine 400 that is distinct from that promoted by progestin agonists. These data underscore the structural flexibility of the NTD of PR, and the ability of steroid ligands together with interacting proteins to affect the conformation and activity of the NTD.

Progesterone receptor A and c-Met mediates spheroids-endometrium attachment

BACKGROUND

Implantation in humans involves cross talk between an active blastocyst and receptive endometrium. The role of the endometrial receptors in this complex embryo-maternal interaction is still unclear. We tested gene and protein expression of endometrial receptors (Progesterone receptor (PR) and c-Met) and the effect of theses receptors in endometrial receptivity.

METHODS

Two endometrial cell lines were used: HEC-1A and RL95-2 considered as being of low and high receptivity, respectively. Western blot and RT-PCR analysis were utilized to study the receptor expression profile.The role of endometrial receptors in endometrial receptivity was studied by attachment and invasion assays of JAR spheroids (made of a trophoblast cell line) on endometrial cells. Different manipulations of inhibition and stimulation of the endometrial receptors were used including: inhibition by specific antibodies against the receptors, or antagonist of the receptors, as well as transfection with antisense for the endometrial receptors, stimulation by specific ligands for the receptors and transfection with the gene for endometrial receptors.

RESULTS

Different protein expression patterns of endometrial receptors were observed between the tested endometrial cell lines. The expression levels of PRA ratio to PRB, and the 50 kDa c-MET isoform were significantly lower in HEC-1A as compared with RL95-2. Attachment rates and growth of JAR spheroids into HEC-1A were significantly lower as compared with RL95-2. Stimulation of PR with progesterone altered attachment rates to HEC-1A. Inhibition of PR with RU-486 mildly increased attachment rate to HEC-1A whereas it slightly decreased attachment rate to RL95-2. c-Met inhibition decreased attachment rates only to HEC-1A cells that expressing high levels of Plexin-B1 (PB1). Immunoprecipitation studies revealed that c-Met and PB1 associate in complexes in the endometrial cell lines.

CONCLUSION

Differential endometrial receptor profiles are expressed during the receptivity period. The attachment and invasion processes are separately regulated. We suggest a biologically functional role for PRA in endometrial receptivity and in the attachment process. c-Met contribution is minor and related with creation of a complex with PB1.

Global gene expression profiling of progesterone receptor modulators in T47D cells provides a new classification system

Progesterone receptor modulators (PRMs) play an important role in women's health. They are widely used in oral contraception or hormone therapy, and provide an attractive treatment approach for gynecological disorders such as uterine leiomyomas, endometriosis or breast cancer. Due to the broad range of activities, various studies were conducted to assess progesterone receptor antagonists (PAs) and selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRMs) with respect to progesterone receptor (PR) agonistic and antagonistic activities in vivo. These properties are not always adequately reflected in classical in vitro models, especially differences in the agonistic potential of SPRMs, such as asoprisnil, J1042, and J912, and mixed antagonists, such as mifepristone, are not sufficiently substantiated. The effects of PRMs upon gene expression in progesterone target tissues such as breast epithelium and uterus are poorly understood. This study compares the properties of PR ligands using mammalian two-hybrid assays and gene expression profiling. The protein-protein interaction analyses in HeLa cells provide for specific ligand-induced PR conformations, whereas Affymetrix GeneChip HG-U133Plus2.0 analyses in T47D breast cancer cells indicate the transcriptional activity on the level of target genes. The analyses comprise the pure agonist R5020, the non-steroidal PR modulator PRA-910, SPRMs (J1042, asoprisnil, J912), the mixed antagonist mifepristone, classical antagonists (onapristone, ZK 137316) and the pure antagonist lonaprisan to consider all types of ligands described before. Marginal differences were identified in coactivator interaction profiles at all, but significant differences between SPRMs and PR antagonists (PAs) were observed in recruiting the LXXLL-motif containing peptide (LX-H10), very similar to in vivo activities in endometrial transformation in the rabbit (McPhail test). Global gene expression profiles demonstrated progesterone-independent effects for all PR modulators examined and emphasised similarities of asoprisnil and J1042 compared to J912 and all types of PR antagonists. In summary, the data support the popular concept of PR modulator classification in agonists, selective progesterone receptor modulators, mixed and pure antagonists. It further refines previous classification models and accentuates unique effects for each PR modulator.

Detection of potential (anti)progestagenic endocrine disruptors using a recombinant human progesterone receptor binding and transactivation assay

The present work describes the identification of (anti)progestin endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDC) using a two step screening system. In the first step a competitive binding assay was developed using recombinant human progesterone receptor (hPR). The tested chemicals were of various classes like insecticides, their metabolites, industrial chemicals and waste water treatment plant (WWTP) effluents. All the tested chemicals demonstrated a high affinity binding for hPR. The average IC50 values of the test chemicals were within the range of 1-25microM. In the second step of screening, a mammalian cell-based hPR transactivation assay was developed where HEK 293 cells were co-transfected with hPR and luciferase reporter gene under the control of progesterone-response element. Stimulation of the cells with progesterone resulted in about 25-fold up regulation of luciferase activity, with EC50 value of 4nM. Potent anti-progesterone, RU486, significantly inhibited progesterone-induced transactivation and non-progestagenic steroids failed to transactivate hPR till 1microM concentrations. The chemicals showing high binding affinities in competitive binding assays were then tested in transactivation assay and all of them were found to be anti-progestative except WWTP effluents. Transactivation assays using extracted water samples from five different WWTP effluents showed that it was rich in progestative compounds. The levels of induction caused by these effluents were in the range of 15-25% of induction by progesterone and they represented about 6ng/l equivalent progesterone activities. In conclusion, we demonstrated that this two step assay provides an efficient screening tool for the detection of (anti)progestative EDC in various samples.

Facilitation or inhibition of the oestradiol-induced gonadotrophin surge in the immature female rat by progesterone: effects on pituitary responsiveness to gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH), GnRH self-priming and pituitary mRNAs for the progesterone receptor A and B isoforms

Progesterone can either facilitate or inhibit the oestradiol (E(2))-induced gonadotrophin surge. We have previously developed immature female rat models to characterise and investigate the mechanisms of progesterone inhibition or facilitation. The aim of the present study was to determine the role of pituitary responsiveness to gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and GnRH self-priming under conditions of progesterone-facilitation and progesterone-inhibition, and whether the underlying mechanisms reflect changes in mRNAs encoding the A and B isoforms of the progesterone receptor (PR) in the pituitary gland. Pituitary responsiveness to GnRH, determined by measuring the luteinising hormone (LH) response to one i.v. injection of GnRH, was decreased by 60-80% (P < 0.001) in the progesterone-inhibition model. GnRH self-priming, estimated as the increment in the LH response to the second of two injections of GnRH separated by 60 min, was also significantly reduced (P < 0.05) in this model. In the progesterone-facilitation model, the LH response to GnRH injection was increased 2.5-3-fold (P < 0.05), an effect suppressed by the progesterone receptor antagonist, mifepristone. Progesterone-facilitation of LH release and increased pituitary responsiveness to GnRH were blocked by sheep anti-GnRH serum injected i.v. immediately after insertion of progesterone implants. The PR-B mRNA isoform, measured by solution hybridisation/RNase protection assay, was the predominant form in the pituitary of the immature female rat. PR-B was increased by E(2) and decreased by progesterone in both models. Thus, in immature female rats, progesterone-inhibition of the E(2)-induced LH surge is due to significant reduction in pituitary responsiveness to GnRH as well as in the magnitude of GnRH self-priming. Progesterone-facilitation of the E(2)-induced LH surge is due to increased pituitary responsiveness to GnRH, which is mediated by PR, and depends on endogenous GnRH release. The differences between progesterone-facilitation and progesterone-inhibition are not due to differences in regulation of pituitary PR-B mRNA.

5-(3-Cyclopentyl-2-thioxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-benzimidazol-5-yl)-1-methyl-1H-pyrrole-2-carbonitrile: A novel, highly potent, selective, and orally active non-steroidal progesterone receptor agonist

We have recently discovered 5-(3-cyclopentyl-2-thioxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-benzimidazol-5-yl)-1-methyl-1H-pyrrole-2-carbonitrile (14) as a potent, selective, and orally active non-steroidal progesterone receptor (PR) agonist. Compound 14 and its analog 13 possessed sub-nanomolar in vitro potency (EC(50) 0.1-0.5nM) in the T47D alkaline phosphatase assay, similar to that of the steroidal PR agonist medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA). In contrast to MPA, 14 was highly selective (>500-fold) for the PR over both glucocorticoid and androgen receptors. In the rat uterine decidualization and complement component C3 models, 14 had oral ED(50) values of 0.02 and 0.003mg/kg, respectively, and was from 6- to 20-fold more potent than MPA. In the monkey ovulation inhibition model, compound 14 was also highly efficacious and potent with an oral ED(100) of 0.03mg/kg.

Progesterone: Therapeutic opportunities for neuroprotection and myelin repair

Progesterone and its metabolites promote the viability of neurons in the brain and spinal cord. Their neuroprotective effects have been documented in different lesion models, including traumatic brain injury (TBI), experimentally induced ischemia, spinal cord lesions and a genetic model of motoneuron disease. Progesterone plays an important role in developmental myelination and in myelin repair, and the aging nervous system appears to remain sensitive to some of progesterone's beneficial effects. Thus, the hormone may promote neuroregeneration by several different actions by reducing inflammation, swelling and apoptosis, thereby increasing the survival of neurons, and by promoting the formation of new myelin sheaths. Recognition of the important pleiotropic effects of progesterone opens novel perspectives for the treatment of brain lesions and diseases of the nervous system. Over the last decade, there have been a growing number of studies showing that exogenous administration of progesterone or some of its metabolites can be successfully used to treat traumatic brain and spinal cord injury, as well as ischemic stroke. Progesterone can also be synthesized by neurons and by glial cells within the nervous system. This finding opens the way for a promising therapeutic strategy, the use of pharmacological agents, such as ligands of the translocator protein (18 kDa) (TSPO; the former peripheral benzodiazepine receptor or PBR), to locally increase the synthesis of steroids with neuroprotective and neuroregenerative properties. A concept is emerging that progesterone may exert different actions and use different signaling mechanisms in normal and injured neural tissue.

The evolution of progesterone receptor ligands

Progesterone is one of the first nuclear receptor hormones to be described functionally and subsequently approached as a drug target. Because progesterone (1) affects both menstruation and gestation via the progesterone receptor (PR), research aimed at modulating its activity is usually surrounded by controversy. However, ligands for PR were developed into drugs, and their evolution can be crudely divided into three periods: (1) drug-like steroids that mimic the gestational properties of progesterone; (2) drug-like steroids with different properties from progesterone and expanded therapeutic applications; and (3) non-steroidal PR ligands with improved selectivity and modulator properties and further expanded therapeutic applications. Although the latter have yet to see widespread clinical applications, their development is founded on a half century of research, and they represent the future for this drug target.

Progesterone receptor isoforms and proliferation in the rat mammary gland during development

Progesterone (P), acting through progesterone receptor (PR) isoforms A and B, plays an important role in normal mammary gland development and is implicated in the etiology of breast cancer. Because of significant similarities between human and rat mammary gland development and hormonal responsiveness of mammary cancers, we investigated P action in the rat mammary gland. By immunohistochemical methods we determined PRA and PRB expression at puberty, sexual maturity, pregnancy, and lactation and after postlactational involution and their functional roles in the regulation of proliferation. PRA expression was restricted to luminal epithelial cells, whereas PRB was expressed in both luminal and myoepithelial cells, indicating a novel role of PRB in myoepithelial cell regulation. The majority of PRA-positive (PRA+) cells coexpressed PRB. In the pubertal and adult virgin mammary gland, PRA+PRB+ cells also expressed nuclear cyclin D1 but did not contain the proliferation marker bromodeoxyuridine. Based on a lack of phosphorylated retinoblastoma protein expression and the expression patterns of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p21 and p27 in these cells, we conclude that PRA+PRB+ cells appear to be cell cycle arrested and do not proliferate. PRA+ cells were decreased in the adult gland and during and after pregnancy. The percentage of PRB+ cells was relatively constant throughout development, and in a significant proportion of cells, only PRB was detected. During development, and especially during pregnancy, a high percentage of PRB+ cells were positive for bromodeoxyuridine. From this observation, we conclude that these cells proliferate and that P acting through PRB may directly stimulate proliferation.

Kinases and protein phosphorylation as regulators of steroid hormone action

Although the primary signal for the activation of steroid hormone receptors is binding of hormone, there is increasing evidence that the activities of cell signaling pathways and the phosphorylation status of these transcription factors and their coregulators determine the overall response to the hormone. In some cases, enhanced cell signaling is sufficient to cause activation of receptors in medium depleted of steroids. Steroid receptors are targets for multiple kinases. Many of the phosphorylation sites contain Ser/Thr-Pro motifs implicating proline-directed kinases such as the cyclin-dependent kinases and the mitogen-activated kinases (MAPK) in receptor phosphorylation. Although some sites are constitutively phosphorylated, others are phosphorylated in response to hormone. Still others are only phosphorylated in response to specific cell signaling pathways. Phosphorylation of specific sites has been implicated not only in overall transcriptional activity, but also in nuclear localization, protein stability, and DNA binding. The studies of the roles of phosphorylation in coregulator function are more limited, but it is now well established that many of them are highly phosphorylated and that phosphorylation regulates their function. There is good evidence that some of the phosphorylation sites in the receptors and coregulators are targets of multiple signaling pathways. Individual sites have been associated both with functions that enhance the activity of the receptor, as well as with functions that inhibit activity. Thus, the specific combinations of phosphorylations of the steroid receptor combined with the expression levels and phosphorylation status of coregulators will determine the genes regulated and the biological response.

Distinct temporal and spatial activities of RU486 on progesterone receptor function in reproductive organs of ovariectomized mice

RU486 is an incomplete progesterone receptor (PR) antagonist due to its partial agonist activity. To investigate the tissue-specific effects of RU486 on PR function in an ovariectomized mouse model, we used the progesterone receptor activity indicator mouse and evaluated the key determinants of progesterone-dependent gene activity: PR, coregulators, and kinases. As might be expected, acute RU486 treatment (6 h after injection) reduced PR transcriptional activity in the uterus, compared with vehicle or progesterone (P4) treatments. Chronic RU486 treatment (3 d) had a distinctly different effect on PR-mediated transcription, elevating PR activity in both the uterus and mammary gland, whereas chronic P4 treatment reduced PR activity in both tissues. This elevated uterine PR activity was associated with increased modified forms of PR and total protein levels of steroid receptor coactivator (SRC)-1 without affecting SRC-2 or SRC-3 protein levels. In addition to increased levels of coactivators, chronic RU486 treatment activated the ERK-1/2 and c-Jun N-terminal kinase signaling pathways in the uterus in a manner comparable with P4 treatment. In contrast to our observations in the uterus, chronic RU486 treatment increased modified forms of PR and the SRC-3 protein levels (but not SRC-1 and SRC-2 levels) in luminal epithelial cells of the mammary gland. Chronic RU486 also activated the c-Jun N-terminal kinase, but not ERK-1/2, signaling pathways in mammary luminal epithelial cells. This report suggests that in comparison with chronic natural hormone (P4), a mixed antagonist/agonist (RU486) induces a distinct temporal and spatial pattern of cellular genetic regulators that accompany ligand-specific gene expression.

Cyclin dependent kinase 2 and the regulation of human progesterone receptor activity

The function of the S phase kinase cyclin A/Cdk2 in maintaining and regulating cell cycle kinetics is well established. However an alternative role in the regulation of progesterone receptor (PR) signaling is emerging. PR and its coactivators are phosphoproteins. Cyclin A/Cdk2 phosphorylates several of the PR phosphorylation sites in vitro and there is evidence that it participates in PR phosphorylation in vivo. Cyclin A/Cdk2 also functions as a PR coactivator. Overexpression increases PR transcriptional activity independent of PR phosphorylation. In the presence of hormone, cyclin A/Cdk2 is recruited to PR bound to DNA of target genes. Inhibition of Cdk activity prevents recruitment of the p160 coactivator steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1), suggesting that Cdk2 phosphorylates SRC-1. Consistent with this finding, phosphatase treatment of SRC-1 reduces its ability to interact with PR in vitro. Moreover, PR transcriptional activity is highest in S phase where cyclin A is expressed. In G1, PR activity is reduced and the capacity to recruit SRC-1 to a progestin responsive promoter is diminished. Future studies will focus on the importance of cyclin A/Cdk2 phosphorylation of other components of the PR transcription complex, such as the p160 coactivator SRC-1, and the specific role of Cdk2 target sites in the regulation of PR activity.

Nuclear factor-kappab (NF-kappaB): an unsuspected major culprit in the pathogenesis of endometriosis that is still at large?

Endometriosis, defined as the ectopic presence of endometrial glandular and stromal cells outside the uterine cavity, is a common benign gynecological disorder with an enigmatic pathogenesis. Many genes and gene products have been reported to be altered in endometriosis, yet some of them may not be major culprits but merely unwitting accomplices or even innocent bystanders. Therefore, the identification and apprehension of major culprits in the pathogenesis of endometriosis are crucial to the understanding of the pathogenesis and would help to develop better therapeutics for endometriosis. Although so far NF-kappaB only has left few traces of incriminating fingerprints, several lines of investigation suggest that NF-kappaB, a pivotal pro-inflammatory transcription factor, could promote and maintain endometriosis. Various inflammatory agents, growth factors, and oxidative stress activate NF-kappaB. NF-kappaB proteins themselves and proteins regulated by them have been linked to cellular transformation, proliferation, apoptosis, angiogenesis, and invasion. Interestingly, all existing and nearly all investigational medications for endometriosis appear to act through suppression of NF-kappaB activation. In endometriotic cells, NF-kappaB appears to be constitutively activated, and suppression of NF-kappaB activity by NF-kappaB inhibitors or proteasome inhibitors suppresses proliferation in vitro. Viewing NF-kappaB as a major culprit, an autoregulatory loop model can be postulated, which is consistent with existing data and, more importantly, can explain several puzzling phenomena that are otherwise difficult to interpret based on prevailing theories. This view has immediate and important implications for novel ways to treat endometriosis. Further research is warranted to precisely delineate the roles of NF-kappaB in the pathogenesis of endometriosis and to indict and convict its aiders and abettors.

Molecular properties and preclinical pharmacology of JNJ-1250132, a steroidal progesterone receptor modulator that inhibits binding of the receptor to DNA in vitro

Progesterone receptor modulators have diverse potential therapeutic uses, including the treatment of endometriosis, uterine fibroids and breast cancer. Here we describe the molecular properties and preclinical pharmacology of a new steroidal progestin antagonist, JNJ-1250132. The compound is a high affinity ligand for the progesterone receptor, possessing cross-reactivity with other steroid receptors comparable to that of steroidal antagonists such as mifepristone. It inhibits progestin-inducible alkaline phosphatase gene expression in T47D human breast cancer cells, and also inhibits their in vitro proliferation. It inhibits gestation in rats and progesterone-dependent endometrial transformation in rabbits with efficacies comparable to mifepristone. Like mifepristone, it is a glucocorticoid antagonist in vivo. In cell-free DNA binding assays, the compound inhibits binding of the human progesterone receptor to a progesterone response element, and thus is similar to onapristone in this regard. In contrast, as judged by proteolytic analysis, JNJ-1250132 induces a receptor conformation more similar to that induced by mifepristone, which promotes receptor binding to DNA. Therefore, JNJ-1250132 has unique effects on the progesterone receptor that may translate into a novel clinical profile.

Protective effect of spironolactone on endothelial cell apoptosis

Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) undergo apoptosis in response to serum deprivation. We show that the nonspecific mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, spironolactone, protects from caspase-3 activation induced by serum deprivation in contrast to the selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, eplerenone, that is nonprotective. We also demonstrate that progesterone, hydrocortisone, and dexamethasone all protect HUVECs from serum-deprivation-induced caspase-3 activation, whereas aldosterone and dihydrotestosterone have no effect. Spironolactone has been demonstrated to display agonist activity only to the progesterone receptor (PR), and we additionally show that spironolactone and progesterone, but not eplerenone, inhibit mitochondrial cytochrome c release and cleavage of nuclear poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) and increase cell viability. Additionally, the PR antagonist mifepristone (RU486) partially blocked the inhibitory effect of both spironolactone and progesterone on caspase-3 activation, cytochrome c release, and nuclear PARP cleavage. Nitric oxide (NO) protects HUVECs from apoptosis in response to various stimuli including serum-deprivation; however, the NO synthase inhibitor N-monomethyl-l-arginine, did not abolish inhibition of caspase-3 activation or PARP cleavage by spironolactone. Thus, we demonstrate that spironolactone protects HUVECs from serum-deprivation-induced apoptosis by inhibition of caspase-3 activity, cytochrome c release and PARP cleavage by a NO-independent mechanism; further, this effect is likely mediated by the agonist properties of spironolactone toward the PR.

Differential response of progesterone receptor isoforms in hormone-dependent and -independent facilitation of female sexual receptivity

Neurobehavioral effects of progesterone are mediated primarily by its interaction with neural progesterone receptors (PRs), expressed as PR-A and PR-B protein isoforms. Whereas the expression of two isoforms in the neural tissues is suggestive of their selective cellular responses and modulation of distinct subsets of PR-induced target genes, the role of individual isoforms in brain and behavior is unknown. We have previously demonstrated a critical role for PRs as transcriptional mediators of progesterone (ligand-dependent), and dopamine (ligand-independent)-facilitated female reproductive behavior in female mice lacking both the isoforms of PR. To further elucidate the selective contribution of the individual PR isoforms in female sexual receptive behavior, we used the recently generated PR-A and PR-B isoform-specific null mutant mice. We present evidence for differential responses of each isoform to progesterone and dopamine agonist, SKF 81297 (SKF), and demonstrate a key role for PR-A isoform in both hormone-dependent and -independent facilitation of sexual receptive behavior. Interestingly, whereas both the isoforms were essential for SKF-facilitated sexual behavior, PR-A appeared to play a more important role in the 8-bromo-cAMP-facilitated lordosis response, raising the possibility of distinct intracellular signaling pathways mediating the responses. Finally, we also demonstrate that antiprogestin, RU38486, was an effective inhibitor of PR-A-mediated, progesterone-dependent, but not SKF or 8-bromo-cAMP-dependent sexual receptivity. The data reveal the selective contributions of individual isoforms to the signaling pathways mediating female reproductive behavior.

Estradiol regulates different genes in human breast tumor xenografts compared with the identical cells in culture

In breast cancers, estrogen receptor (ER) levels are highly correlated with response to endocrine therapies. We sought to define mechanisms of estrogen (E) signaling in a solid breast tumor model using gene expression profiling. ER(+) T47D-Y human breast cancer cells were grown as xenografts in ovariectomized nude mice under four conditions: 1) 17beta-estradiol for 8 wk (E); 2) without E for 8 wk (control); 3) E for 7 wk followed by 1 wk of E withdrawal (Ewd); or 4) E for 8 wk plus tamoxifen for the last week. E-regulated genes were defined as those that differed significantly between control and E and/or between E and Ewd or control and Ewd. These protocols generated 188 in vivo E-regulated genes that showed two major patterns of regulation. Approximately 46% returned to basal states after Ewd (class I genes); 53% did not (class II genes). In addition, more than 70% of class II-regulated genes also failed to reverse in response to tamoxifen. These genes may be interesting for the study of hormone-resistance issues. A subset of in vivo E-regulated genes appears on lists of clinical ER discriminator genes. These may be useful therapeutic targets or markers of E activity. Comparison of in vivo E-regulated genes with those regulated in identical cells in vitro after 6 and 24 h of E treatment demonstrate only 11% overlap. This indicates the extent to which gene expression profiles are uniquely dependent on hormone-treatment times and the cellular microenvironment.

Dexamethasone upregulates the expression of the nuclear cofactor p300 and its interaction with C/EBPbeta in cultured myotubes

Muscle wasting during sepsis and other catabolic conditions is, at least in part, mediated by glucocorticoids and is associated with upregulated transcription of multiple genes in the ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway. In addition to transcription factors, nuclear cofactors, including p300, regulate gene transcription. We tested the hypothesis that glucocorticoids upregulate the expression of p300 in muscle cells. Treatment of cultured L6 myotubes, a rat skeletal muscle cell line, with dexamethasone resulted in a dose- and time-dependent increase in p300 protein and mRNA levels. Surprisingly, the effect of dexamethasone on p300 levels was not inhibited by the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) antagonist RU38486 and RU38486 exerted an agonist effect on p300, increasing its expression. Co-immunoprecipitation showed that treatment of the myotubes with dexamethasone resulted in protein-protein interaction between p300 and C/EBPbeta, but not C/EBPdelta. The present results suggest that glucocorticoids upregulate the expression of p300 and its interaction with C/EBPbeta in skeletal muscle. Increased expression and activity of p300 may be involved in the regulation of gene transcription in glucocorticoid-dependent muscle wasting.

Selective progesterone receptor modulators and progesterone antagonists: mechanisms of action and clinical applications

Since the discovery of the antiprogestin mifepristone, hundreds of similar compounds have been synthesized, which can be grouped in a large family of progesterone receptor ligands. This family includes pure agonists such as progesterone itself or progestins and, at the other end of the biological spectrum, pure progesterone receptor antagonists (PA). Selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRM) have mixed agonist-antagonist properties, and occupy an intermediate position of the spectrum. These compounds have numerous applications in female health care. Mifepristone is used to terminate pregnancy, and as such is commercially available in many countries. The negative abortion-related image of mifepristone has clearly limited the involvement of the major pharmaceutical companies in the development of PA and SPRM. Many PA and SPRM display direct antiproliferative effects in the endometrium, although with variable actions which seem product- and dose-dependent. This property justifies their use in the treatment of myomas and endometriosis. PA also suppress late follicular development, block the LH surge and retard endometrial maturation, which renders them potential estrogen-free contraceptive drugs. SPRM such as asoprisnil are not as effective in blocking the LH surge and appear to target the endometrium directly and produce amenorrhoea. Interestingly, clinical data show that treatment with these compounds is not associated with hypo-estrogenism and bone loss. The potential clinical applications of these compounds cover a broad field and are very promising in major public health areas. These include emergency contraception, long-term estrogen-free contraception (administered alone, or in association with a progestin-only pill to improve bleeding patterns), myomas (where they induce a marked reduction in tumour volume and produce amenorrhoea) and endometriosis. Further developments might also include hormone replacement therapy in post-menopausal women, as well as the treatment of hormone-dependent tumours.

Progesterone antagonists and progesterone receptor modulators

Since the discovery of the antiprogestin RU 486 (mifepristone), other compounds have been synthesised that function as pure progesterone antagonists or progesterone receptor modulators. The latter are mixed agonists-antagonists. Mifepristone is usually used to terminate pregnancy but these compounds have numerous other applications in female healthcare. Mifepristone is an excellent agent for emergency contraception. Many progesterone antagonists and progesterone receptor modulators display antiproliferative effects on the endometrium and thus have application in the treatment of endometriosis and uterine myoma without being associated with hypoestrogenism and bone loss. They also have contraceptive potential by suppressing follicular development, blocking the luteinising hormone surge and retarding endometrial maturation. Finally, they have clinical application in GeneSwitch system, a plasmid-based method enabling controlled expression of specific genes (e.g., erythropoietin) using a progesterone antagonist as the inducer.

Cyclin-dependent kinase activity is required for progesterone receptor function: novel role for cyclin A/Cdk2 as a progesterone receptor coactivator

Our studies examining the role of the cell cycle-regulated kinase cyclin A/Cdk2 in progesterone receptor (PR) action have demonstrated that cyclin-dependent kinase activity is required for PR function and that cyclin A/Cdk2 functions as a PR coactivator. Although Cdk2 can phosphorylate PR, elimination of these phosphorylation sites has little effect on the ability of cyclin A/Cdk2 to stimulate PR activity. PR interacts with cyclin A and recruits cyclin A/Cdk2 to progestin-responsive promoters, stimulating transcription. Inhibition of Cdk2 activity abolishes progesterone-dependent activation of PR target genes in part through inhibition of PR-dependent recruitment of steroid receptor coactivator 1 (SRC-1) and subsequent histone H4 acetylation at the target promoter. In vitro studies revealed that the interaction between SRC-1 and PR is dependent upon phosphorylation of SRC-1. This heretofore-unknown mechanism provides a potential means for integrating the regulation of PR activity with cell cycle progression. Moreover, the ability of PR to recruit cyclin A/Cdk2 to target promoters provides locally elevated levels of kinase, which can preferentially facilitate phosphorylation-dependent interactions and enzymatic activities of coactivators at the target promoter.

Reproductive tissue selective actions of progesterone receptors

The steroid hormone, progesterone, plays a central coordinate role in diverse events associated with female reproduction. In humans and other vertebrates, the biological activity of progesterone is mediated by modulation of the transcriptional activity of two progesterone receptors, PR-A and PR-B. These receptors arise from the same gene and exhibit both overlapping and distinct transcriptional activities in vitro. To delineate the individual roles of PR-A and PR-B in vivo, we have generated mouse models in which expression of a single PR isoform has been ablated. Analysis of the reproductive phenotypes of these mice has indicated that PR-A and PR-B mediate mostly distinct but partially overlapping reproductive responses to progesterone. While selective ablation of the PR-A protein (PR-A knockout mice, PRAKO mice) shows normal mammary gland response to progesterone but severe uterine hyperplasia and ovarian abnormalities, ablation of PR-B protein (PRBKO mice) does not affect biological responses of the ovary or uterus to progesterone but results in reduced pregnancy-associated mammary gland morphogenesis. The distinct tissue-specific reproductive responses to progesterone exhibited by these isoforms are due to regulation of distinct subsets of progesterone-dependent target genes by the individual PR isoforms. This review will summarize our current understanding of the selective contribution of PR isoforms to the cellular and molecular actions of progesterone in reproductive tissues.

Progesterone receptors induce cell cycle progression via activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases

Progestins induce proliferation of breast cancer cells and are implicated in the development of breast cancer. The effects of progestins are mediated by progesterone receptors (PRs), although it is unclear whether proliferative effects are delivered through activities as ligand-activated transcription factors or via activation of cytoplasmic kinases. We report that progestin induces S phase entry of T47D cells stably expressing either wild-type (wt) PR-B or a transcriptionally impaired PR-B harboring a point mutation at Ser294, a ligand-dependent and MAPK consensus phosphorylation site (S294A). Both wt and S294A PR are capable of activating p42/p44 MAPKs and promoting proliferation. However, cells expressing wt, but not S294A PR, exhibited enhanced proliferation in response to combined epidermal growth factor and progestin. S phase progression correlated with up-regulation of cyclin D1. The PR antagonist RU486 also induced MAPK activation, increased cyclin D1 expression, and stimulated S phase entry, which was blocked by inhibition of either p42/p44 or p38 MAPKs, whereas proliferation induced by R5020 was sensitive only to p42/p44 MAPK inhibition. MCF-7 cells stably expressing a mutant PR unable to bind c-Src and activate MAPK failed to support progestin-induced proliferation. These data suggest that PR mediate cell cycle progression primarily through activation of cytoplasmic kinases and independently of direct regulation of transcription, whereas the coordinate regulation of both aspects of PR action are required for enhanced proliferation in response to progestins in the presence of growth factors. Targeting the ability of steroid receptors to activate MAPKs may be beneficial for breast cancer patients.

Identification of Genes Regulated by Leukemia-Inhibitory Factor in the Mouse Uterus at the Time of Implantation

The endometrium is prepared for implantation by the actions of estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4). In mice the luminal epithelium (LE) only becomes fully receptive to the attaching blastocyst in response to the nidatory estrogen surge on d 4 of pregnancy. The cytokine leukemia-inhibitory factor (LIF) is rapidly induced by nidatory estrogen and has been shown to be the primary mediator of its action. Implantation fails in the absence of LIF, and injection of LIF on d 4 of pregnancy can substitute for the nidatory estrogen. In this study, we sought to identify genes regulated by LIF in the uterine epithelium. We used oligonucleotide microarrays to compare the transcript profiles of paired uterine horns from LIF-deficient MF1 mice after intraluminal injection of LIF or PBS on d 4 of pseudopregnancy. IGF-binding protein 3 was identified as a gene up-regulated by LIF; this was confirmed by RT-PCR. In situ hybridization showed that the primary site of IGF-binding protein 3 expression is the luminal epithelium (LE), the known site of LIF action in the uterus. We identified two other genes: amphiregulin and immune response gene-1, the expression of which were also up-regulated by LIF. Immune response gene 1 has recently been shown to be essential for implantation. Expression of all three of these genes in the LE is known to be regulated by P4. The expression of osteoblast-specific factor 2 and leukocyte 12/15 lipoxygenase, which are also expressed in LE under the control of P4, were not increased by LIF. This suggests that one of the actions of LIF on LE may be to enhance the expression of a subset of P4-regulated genes.

A new luciferase reporter gene assay for the detection of androgenic and antiandrogenic effects based on a human prostate specific antigen promoter and PC3/AR human prostate cancer cells

We developed a new mammalian cell-based luciferase reporter gene assay for androgenic and antiandrogenic activities of chemicals and environmental samples. Environmental samples usually have a complex matrix that may contain the constituents acting as androgen receptor (AR) agonists, AR antagonists or aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) agonists. AhR agonists are known to elicit the antiandrogenic effect through cross-talk between AR and AhR signal transduction pathways. In this study, PC3/AR human prostate carcinoma cells were transiently transfected with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) promoter-driven luciferase expression plasmid. The cells were treated with a test compound or an environmental sample for 24 h at 37 degrees C and then measured for luciferase activity. The luciferase activity was induced by dihydrotestosterone (DHT) in a concentration-dependent manner in a concentration range from 10 fM to 1 nM. R1881, a synthetic androgen receptor agonist, induced luciferase activity and its inductive effects was additive to that of DHT. The luciferase activity was not induced by cortisol, a glucocorticoid, progesterone, a progestin, and 17beta-estradiol, an estrogen in a concentration range of up to 1 microM. DHT-induced luciferase activity was reduced by bicalutamide and cyproterone acetate, AR antagonists, and also by benzo[a]pyrene, an aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonist, through AhR-mediated pathways. All of these findings indicate that the present assay system correctly responds to AR agonists, AR antagonists and AhR agonist and, therefore, it is a powerful tool for the sensitive and selective screening of chemicals and environmental samples for their androgenic and antiandrogenic activities. We developed the first assay system, in which the expression of luciferase was driven by the promoter of a prostate-specific antigen gene, a typical human androgen-regulated gene.

Screening of some anti-androgenic endocrine disruptors using a recombinant cell-based in vitro bioassay

The present work describes the development and optimization of a cell-based androgen reporter assay using the Chinese hamster ovarian cell line (CHO K1) in the 96-well format. The recent reports on increasing exposure of humans and wild-life to environmental endocrine disrupting chemicals (ED) prompt the need for high throughput screening systems for such compounds in environmental and biological samples. To this end, CHO cells were cotransfected with plasmids encoding mouse mammary tumour virus-neomycin-luciferase and human androgen receptor (hAR), and a stable cell line was established. After selection with neomycin, a highly active clone was obtained which stably expressed both the hAR and the androgen-responsive luciferase reporter. Stimulation of the cells with androgens for 24 h resulted in about 15-fold stimulation of luciferase activity, with the minimum effective dose of testosterone being 0.1 nmol/l. Potent steroidal and non-steroidal anti-androgens, such as hydroxyflutamide and cyproterone acetate, significantly inhibited the androgen-induced transactivation. Non-androgenic steroids like estradiol, progesterone, dexamethasone and cortisol showed weak activity at high concentrations. RT-PCR and western blot confirmed proper transcription and translation as well as stable expression of the AR gene in the cells. About 60 different chemicals (mostly pesticides or their metabolites, and common industrial chemicals) were screened with the cell line for their ability to stimulate luciferase activity or inhibit that evoked by 0.1 nmol/l R1881, used as a positive androgenic control. About 10 highly potent anti-androgenic chemicals were identified. The most potent anti-androgenic compounds identified in our assay included bisphenol A, alpha-hexachlorocyclohexane, vinclozolin and 4,4-DDE. These compounds had alone either no effect or were weak agonists (with cytotoxic effects at very high concentrations), but none showed any significant agonistic activity. In conclusion, we demonstrate that the bioassay based on this cell line provides a reliable test for detecting androgenic and anti-androgenic compounds. The 96-well plate format makes the assay suitable for high throughput screening.

Progesterone-dependent regulation of female reproductive activity by two distinct progesterone receptor isoforms

The steroid hormone, progesterone, is a central coordinator of all aspects of female reproductive activity. The physiological effects of progesterone are mediated by interaction of the hormone with specific intracellular progesterone receptors (PRs) that are expressed from a single gene as two protein isoforms and that are members of the nuclear receptor superfamily of transcription factors. Analysis of the structural and functional relationships of each isoform using in vitro systems has demonstrated that the PR-A and PR-B proteins have different transcription activation properties when liganded to progesterone. More recently, selective ablation of the PR-A and PR-B proteins in mice had facilitated examination of the contribution of the individual PR isoforms to the pleiotropic reproductive activities of progesterone. Analysis of the phenotypic consequences of these mutations on female reproductive function has provided proof of concept that the distinct transcriptional responses to PR-A and PR-B observed in cell-based transactivation assays are reflected in a distinct tissue-selective contribution of the individual isoforms to the reproductive activities of progesterone. In PR-A knock-out mice, in which the expression of the PR-A isoform is selectively ablated (PRAKO), the PR-B isoform functions in a tissue-specific manner to mediate a subset of the reproductive functions of PRs. Ablation of PR-A does not affect response of the mammary gland or thymus to progesterone but results in severe abnormalities in ovarian and uterine function leading to female infertility. More recent studies using PR-B knock-out (PRBKO) mice have shown that ablation of PR-B does not affect either ovarian, uterine or thymic responses to progesterone but results in reduced mammary ductal morphogenesis and alveologenesis during pregnancy. Thus, PR-A is both necessary and sufficient to elicit the progesterone-dependent reproductive responses necessary for female fertility, while the PR-B isoform is required to elicit normal proliferative and differentiative responses of the mammary gland to progesterone. This review will summarize our current understanding of the selective contribution of the two PR isoforms to progesterone action.