1
|
Kozlova S, Morozova N, Ispolatov Y, Severinov K. Dependence of post-segregational killing mediated by Type II restriction-modification systems on the lifetime of restriction endonuclease effective activity. mBio 2024; 15:e0140824. [PMID: 38980007 PMCID: PMC11324026 DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01408-24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2024] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Plasmid-borne Type II restriction-modification (RM) systems mediate post-segregational killing (PSK). PSK is thought to be caused by the dilution of restriction and modification enzymes during cell division, resulting in accumulation of unmethylated DNA recognition sites and their cleavage by restriction endonucleases. PSK is the likely reason for stabilization of plasmids carrying RM systems in the absence of selection for plasmid maintenance. In this study, we developed a CRISPR interference-based method to eliminate RM-carrying plasmids and study PSK-related phenomena with minimal perturbation to the Escherichia coli host. Plasmids carrying the EcoRV, Eco29kI, and EcoRI RM systems were highly stable, and their loss resulted in SOS response and PSK. In contrast, plasmids carrying the Esp1396I system were poorly stabilized; their loss led to a temporary cessation of growth, followed by full recovery. We demonstrate that this unusual behavior is due to a limited lifetime of the Esp1396I restriction endonuclease activity, which, upon Esp1396I plasmid loss, disappears approximately after two cycles of cell division, i.e., before unmethylated sites appear in significant numbers. Our results indicate that whenever PSK induced by a loss of RM systems, and, possibly, other toxin-antitoxin systems, is considered, the lifetimes of individual system components and the growth rate of host cells shall be taken in account. Mathematical modeling shows, that unlike the situation with classical toxin-antitoxin systems, RM system-mediated PSK is possible when the lifetimes of restriction endonuclease and methyltransferase activities are similar, as long as the toxic restriction endonuclease activity persists for more than two chromosome replication cycles.IMPORTANCEIt is widely accepted that many Type II restriction-modification (RM) systems mediate post-segregational killing (PSK) if plasmids that encode them are lost. In this study, we harnessed an inducible CRISPR-Cas system to remove RM plasmids from Escherichia coli cells to study PSK while minimally perturbing cell physiology. We demonstrate that PSK depends on restriction endonuclease activity lifetime and is not observed when it is less than two replication cycles. We present a mathematical model that explains experimental data and shows that unlike the case of toxin-antitoxin-mediated PSK, the loss of an RM system induced PSK even when the RM enzymes have identical lifetimes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Svetlana Kozlova
- Skolkovo Institute of
Science and Technology, Center for Molecular and Cellular
Biology, Moscow,
Russia
| | - Natalia Morozova
- Peter the Great St.
Petersburg Polytechnic University,
St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Yaroslav Ispolatov
- Physics Department,
University of Santiago of Chile, Center for Interdisciplinary Research
in Astrophysics and Space Science,
Santiago, Chile
| | - Konstantin Severinov
- Waksman Institute for
Microbiology and Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry,
Rutgers, State University of New
Jersey, Piscataway, New
Jersey, USA
- Institute of Gene
Biology, Moscow,
Russia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gulati P, Singh A, Patra S, Bhat S, Verma A. Restriction modification systems in archaea: A panoramic outlook. Heliyon 2024; 10:e27382. [PMID: 38644887 PMCID: PMC11033074 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Revised: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Restriction modification (RM) systems are one of the ubiquitous yet primitive defense responses employed by bacteria and archaea with the primary role of safeguarding themselves against invading bacteriophages. Protection of the host occurs by the cleavage of the invading foreign DNA via restriction endonucleases with concomitant methylation of host DNA with the aid of a methyltransferase counterpart. RM systems have been extensively studied in bacteria, however, in the case of archaea there are limited reports of RM enzymes that are investigated to date owing to their inhospitable growth demands. This review aims to broaden the knowledge about what is known about the diversity of RM systems in archaea and encapsulate the current knowledge on restriction and modification enzymes characterized in archaea so far and the role of RM systems in the milieu of archaeal biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pallavi Gulati
- Department of Microbiology, Ram Lal Anand College, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi 110021, India
| | - Ashish Singh
- Department of Microbiology, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi 110021, India
| | - Sandeep Patra
- Department of Microbiology, Ram Lal Anand College, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi 110021, India
| | - Shreyas Bhat
- Department of Microbiology, Ram Lal Anand College, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi 110021, India
| | - Anil Verma
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA-15213, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dimitriu T, Szczelkun MD, Westra ER. Evolutionary Ecology and Interplay of Prokaryotic Innate and Adaptive Immune Systems. Curr Biol 2021; 30:R1189-R1202. [PMID: 33022264 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.08.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Like many organisms, bacteria and archaea have both innate and adaptive immune systems to defend against infection by viruses and other parasites. Innate immunity most commonly relies on the endonuclease-mediated cleavage of any incoming DNA that lacks a specific epigenetic modification, through a system known as restriction-modification. CRISPR-Cas-mediated adaptive immunity relies on the insertion of short DNA sequences from parasite genomes into CRISPR arrays on the host genome to provide sequence-specific protection. The discovery of each of these systems has revolutionised our ability to carry out genetic manipulations, and, as a consequence, the enzymes involved have been characterised in exquisite detail. In comparison, much less is known about the importance of these two arms of the defence for the ecology and evolution of prokaryotes and their parasites. Here, we review our current ecological and evolutionary understanding of these systems in isolation, and discuss the need to study how innate and adaptive immune responses are integrated when they coexist in the same cell.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatiana Dimitriu
- Environment and Sustainability Institute, Biosciences, University of Exeter, Penryn TR10 9FE, UK.
| | - Mark D Szczelkun
- DNA-Protein Interactions Unit, School of Biochemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, UK.
| | - Edze R Westra
- Environment and Sustainability Institute, Biosciences, University of Exeter, Penryn TR10 9FE, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhu L, Shahid MA, Markham J, Browning GF, Noormohammadi AH, Marenda MS. Genome analysis of Mycoplasma synoviae strain MS-H, the most common M. synoviae strain with a worldwide distribution. BMC Genomics 2018; 19:117. [PMID: 29394882 PMCID: PMC5797395 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-018-4501-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2017] [Accepted: 01/28/2018] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The bacterial pathogen Mycoplasma synoviae can cause subclinical respiratory disease, synovitis, airsacculitis and reproductive tract disease in poultry and is a major cause of economic loss worldwide. The M. synoviae strain MS-H was developed by chemical mutagenesis of an Australian isolate and has been used as a live attenuated vaccine in many countries over the past two decades. As a result it may now be the most prevalent strain of M. synoviae globally. Differentiation of the MS-H vaccine from local field strains is important for epidemiological investigations and is often required for registration of the vaccine. RESULTS The complete genomic sequence of the MS-H strain was determined using a combination of Illumina and Nanopore methods and compared to WVU-1853, the M. synoviae type strain isolated in the USA 30 years before the parent strain of MS-H, and MS53, a more recent isolate from Brazil. The vaccine strain genome had a slightly larger number of pseudogenes than the two other strains and contained a unique 55 kb chromosomal inversion partially affecting a putative genomic island. Variations in gene content were also noted, including a deoxyribose-phosphate aldolase (deoC) fragment and an ATP-dependent DNA helicase gene found only in MS-H. Some of these sequences may have been acquired horizontally from other avian mycoplasma species. CONCLUSIONS MS-H was somewhat more similar to WVU-1853 than to MS53. The genome sequence of MS-H will enable identification of vaccine-specific genetic markers for use as diagnostic and epidemiological tools to better control M. synoviae.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ling Zhu
- Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, VIC 3030 Australia
| | - Muhammad A. Shahid
- Department of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Punjab 60800 Pakistan
| | - John Markham
- Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3000 Australia
| | - Glenn F. Browning
- Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010 Australia
| | - Amir H. Noormohammadi
- Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, VIC 3030 Australia
| | - Marc S. Marenda
- Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, VIC 3030 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ershova AS, Rusinov IS, Spirin SA, Karyagina AS, Alexeevski AV. Role of Restriction-Modification Systems in Prokaryotic Evolution and Ecology. BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) 2016; 80:1373-86. [PMID: 26567582 DOI: 10.1134/s0006297915100193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Restriction-modification (R-M) systems are able to methylate or cleave DNA depending on methylation status of their recognition site. It allows them to protect bacterial cells from invasion by foreign DNA. Comparative analysis of a large number of available bacterial genomes and methylomes clearly demonstrates that the role of R-M systems in bacteria is wider than only defense. R-M systems maintain heterogeneity of a bacterial population and are involved in adaptation of bacteria to change in their environmental conditions. R-M systems can be essential for host colonization by pathogenic bacteria. Phase variation and intragenomic recombinations are sources of the fast evolution of the specificity of R-M systems. This review focuses on the influence of R-M systems on evolution and ecology of prokaryotes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A S Ershova
- Belozerksy Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
The EcoKI type I restriction-modification system in Escherichia coli affects but is not an absolute barrier for conjugation. J Bacteriol 2014; 197:337-42. [PMID: 25384481 DOI: 10.1128/jb.02418-14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The rapid evolution of bacteria is crucial to their survival and is caused by exchange, transfer, and uptake of DNA, among other things. Conjugation is one of the main mechanisms by which bacteria share their DNA, and it is thought to be controlled by varied bacterial immune systems. Contradictory results about restriction-modification systems based on phenotypic studies have been presented as reasons for a barrier to conjugation with and other means of uptake of exogenous DNA. In this study, we show that inactivation of the R.EcoKI restriction enzyme in strain Escherichia coli K-12 strain MG1655 increases the conjugational transfer of plasmid pOLA52, which carriers two EcoKI recognition sites. Interestingly, the results were not absolute, and uptake of unmethylated pOLA52 was still observed in the wild-type strain (with an intact hsdR gene) but at a reduction of 85% compared to the uptake of the mutant recipient with a disrupted hsdR gene. This leads to the conclusion that EcoKI restriction-modification affects the uptake of DNA by conjugation but is not a major barrier to plasmid transfer.
Collapse
|
7
|
Mruk I, Kobayashi I. To be or not to be: regulation of restriction-modification systems and other toxin-antitoxin systems. Nucleic Acids Res 2013; 42:70-86. [PMID: 23945938 PMCID: PMC3874152 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 169] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
One of the simplest classes of genes involved in programmed death is that containing the toxin–antitoxin (TA) systems of prokaryotes. These systems are composed of an intracellular toxin and an antitoxin that neutralizes its effect. These systems, now classified into five types, were initially discovered because some of them allow the stable maintenance of mobile genetic elements in a microbial population through postsegregational killing or the death of cells that have lost these systems. Here, we demonstrate parallels between some TA systems and restriction–modification systems (RM systems). RM systems are composed of a restriction enzyme (toxin) and a modification enzyme (antitoxin) and limit the genetic flux between lineages with different epigenetic identities, as defined by sequence-specific DNA methylation. The similarities between these systems include their postsegregational killing and their effects on global gene expression. Both require the finely regulated expression of a toxin and antitoxin. The antitoxin (modification enzyme) or linked protein may act as a transcriptional regulator. A regulatory antisense RNA recently identified in an RM system can be compared with those RNAs in TA systems. This review is intended to generalize the concept of TA systems in studies of stress responses, programmed death, genetic conflict and epigenetics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iwona Mruk
- Department of Microbiology, University of Gdansk, Wita Stwosza 59, Gdansk, 80-308, Poland, Department of Medical Genome Sciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan and Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vasu K, Nagaraja V. Diverse functions of restriction-modification systems in addition to cellular defense. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2013; 77:53-72. [PMID: 23471617 PMCID: PMC3591985 DOI: 10.1128/mmbr.00044-12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 405] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Restriction-modification (R-M) systems are ubiquitous and are often considered primitive immune systems in bacteria. Their diversity and prevalence across the prokaryotic kingdom are an indication of their success as a defense mechanism against invading genomes. However, their cellular defense function does not adequately explain the basis for their immaculate specificity in sequence recognition and nonuniform distribution, ranging from none to too many, in diverse species. The present review deals with new developments which provide insights into the roles of these enzymes in other aspects of cellular function. In this review, emphasis is placed on novel hypotheses and various findings that have not yet been dealt with in a critical review. Emerging studies indicate their role in various cellular processes other than host defense, virulence, and even controlling the rate of evolution of the organism. We also discuss how R-M systems could have successfully evolved and be involved in additional cellular portfolios, thereby increasing the relative fitness of their hosts in the population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kommireddy Vasu
- Department of Microbiology and Cell Biology, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore
| | - Valakunja Nagaraja
- Department of Microbiology and Cell Biology, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore
- Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Bangalore, India
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lawrence JG, Retchless AC. The interplay of homologous recombination and horizontal gene transfer in bacterial speciation. Methods Mol Biol 2009; 532:29-53. [PMID: 19271178 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-60327-853-9_3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Bacteria experience recombination in two ways. In the context of the Biological Species concept, allelic exchange purges genic variability within bacterial populations as gene exchange mediates selective sweeps. In contrast, horizontal gene transfer (HGT) increases the size of the population's pan-genome by providing an influx of novel genetic material. Here we discuss the interplay of these two processes, with an emphasis on how they allow for the maintenance of genotypically cohesive bacterial populations, yet allow for the separation of these populations upon bacterial speciation. In populations that maintain genotypic similarity by frequent allelic exchange, horizontally transferred genes may initiate ecological barriers to genetic exchange. The resulting recombination interference allows for the accumulation of neutral mutations and, consequently, the imposition of a pre-mating barrier to gene transfer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey G Lawrence
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ohno S, Handa N, Watanabe-Matsui M, Takahashi N, Kobayashi I. Maintenance forced by a restriction-modification system can be modulated by a region in its modification enzyme not essential for methyltransferase activity. J Bacteriol 2008; 190:2039-49. [PMID: 18192396 PMCID: PMC2258900 DOI: 10.1128/jb.01319-07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2007] [Accepted: 01/02/2008] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Several type II restriction-modification gene complexes can force their maintenance on their host bacteria by killing cells that have lost them in a process called postsegregational killing or genetic addiction. It is likely to proceed by dilution of the modification enzyme molecule during rounds of cell division following the gene loss, which exposes unmethylated recognition sites on the newly replicated chromosomes to lethal attack by the remaining restriction enzyme molecules. This process is in apparent contrast to the process of the classical types of postsegregational killing systems, in which built-in metabolic instability of the antitoxin allows release of the toxin for lethal action after the gene loss. In the present study, we characterize a mutant form of the EcoRII gene complex that shows stronger capacity in such maintenance. This phenotype is conferred by an L80P amino acid substitution (T239C nucleotide substitution) mutation in the modification enzyme. This mutant enzyme showed decreased DNA methyltransferase activity at a higher temperature in vivo and in vitro than the nonmutated enzyme, although a deletion mutant lacking the N-terminal 83 amino acids did not lose activity at either of the temperatures tested. Under a condition of inhibited protein synthesis, the activity of the L80P mutant was completely lost at a high temperature. In parallel, the L80P mutant protein disappeared more rapidly than the wild-type protein. These results demonstrate that the capability of a restriction-modification system in forcing maintenance on its host can be modulated by a region of its antitoxin, the modification enzyme, as in the classical postsegregational killing systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satona Ohno
- Department of Medical Genome Sciences, Graduate School of Frontier Science and Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Shirokanedai, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Blakely GW, Murray NE. Control of the endonuclease activity of type I restriction-modification systems is required to maintain chromosome integrity following homologous recombination. Mol Microbiol 2006; 60:883-93. [PMID: 16677300 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05144.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
A type I restriction-modification enzyme will bind to an unmethylated target sequence in DNA and, while still bound to the target, translocate DNA through the protein complex in both directions. DNA breakage occurs when two translocating complexes collide. However, if type I restriction-modification systems bind to unmodified target sequences within the resident bacterial chromosome, as opposed to incoming 'foreign' DNA, their activity is curtailed; a process known as restriction alleviation (RA). We have identified two genes in Escherichia coli, rnhA and recG, mutations in which lead to the alleviation of restriction. Induction of RA in response to these mutations is consistent with the production of unmodified target sequences following DNA synthesis associated with both homologous recombination and R-loop formation. This implies that a normal function of RA is to protect the bacterial chromosome when recombination generates unmodified products. For EcoKI, our experiments demonstrate the contribution of two pathways that serve to protect unmodified DNA in the bacterial chromosome: the primary pathway in which ClpXP degrades the restriction endonuclease and a mechanism dependent on the lar gene within Rac, a resident, defective prophage of E. coli K-12. Previously, the potential of the second pathway has only been demonstrated when expression of lar has been elevated. Our data identify the effect of lar from the repressed prophage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Garry W Blakely
- Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Keatch SA, Su TJ, Dryden DTF. Alleviation of restriction by DNA condensation and non-specific DNA binding ligands. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:5841-50. [PMID: 15520467 PMCID: PMC528803 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkh918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
During conditions of cell stress, the type I restriction and modification enzymes of bacteria show reduced, but not zero, levels of restriction of unmethylated foreign DNA. In such conditions, chemically identical unmethylated recognition sequences also occur on the chromosome of the host but restriction alleviation prevents the enzymes from destroying the host DNA. How is this distinction between chemically identical DNA molecules achieved? For some, but not all, type I restriction enzymes, alleviation is partially due to proteolytic degradation of a subunit of the enzyme. We identify that the additional alleviation factor is attributable to the structural difference between foreign DNA entering the cell as a random coil and host DNA, which exists in a condensed nucleoid structure coated with many non-specific ligands. The type I restriction enzyme is able to destroy the 'naked' DNA using a complex reaction linked to DNA translocation, but this essential translocation process is inhibited by DNA condensation and the presence of non-specific ligands bound along the DNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven A Keatch
- School of Chemistry, The University of Edinburgh, The King's Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JJ, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Loenen WAM. Tracking EcoKI and DNA fifty years on: a golden story full of surprises. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 31:7059-69. [PMID: 14654681 PMCID: PMC291878 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkg944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
1953 was a historical year for biology, as it marked the birth of the DNA helix, but also a report by Bertani and Weigle on 'a barrier to infection' of bacteriophage lambda in its natural host, Escherichia coli K-12, that could be lifted by 'host-controlled variation' of the virus. This paper lay dormant till Nobel laureate Arber and PhD student Dussoix showed that the lambda DNA was rejected and degraded upon infection of different bacterial hosts, unless it carried host-specific modification of that DNA, thus laying the foundations for the phenomenon of restriction and modification (R-M). The restriction enzyme of E.coli K-12, EcoKI, was purified in 1968 and required S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet) and ATP as cofactors. By the end of the decade there was substantial evidence for a chromosomal locus hsdK with three genes encoding restriction (R), modification (M) and specificity (S) subunits that assembled into a large complex of >400 kDa. The 1970s brought the message that EcoKI cut away from its DNA recognition target, to which site the enzyme remained bound while translocating the DNA past itself, with concomitant ATP hydrolysis and subsequent double-strand nicks. This translocation event created clearly visible DNA loops in the electron microscope. EcoKI became the archetypal Type I R-M enzyme with curious DNA translocating properties reminiscent of helicases, recognizing the bipartite asymmetric site AAC(N6)GTGC. Cloning of the hsdK locus in 1976 facilitated molecular understanding of this sophisticated R-M complex and in an elegant 'pas de deux' Murray and Dryden constructed the present model based on a large body of experimental data plus bioinformatics. This review celebrates the golden anniversary of EcoKI and ends with the exciting progress on the vital issue of restriction alleviation after DNA damage, also first reported in 1953, which involves intricate control of R subunit activity by the bacterial proteasome ClpXP, important results that will keep scientists on the EcoKI track for another 50 years to come.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wil A M Loenen
- Department of Medical Microbiology, University Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
|
15
|
Makovets S, Powell LM, Titheradge AJB, Blakely GW, Murray NE. Is modification sufficient to protect a bacterial chromosome from a resident restriction endonuclease? Mol Microbiol 2003; 51:135-47. [PMID: 14651617 DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03801.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
It has been generally accepted that DNA modification protects the chromosome of a bacterium encoding a restriction and modification system. But, when target sequences within the chromosome of one such bacterium (Escherichia coli K-12) are unmodified, the cell does not destroy its own DNA; instead, ClpXP inactivates the nuclease, and restriction is said to be alleviated. Thus, the resident chromosome is recognized as 'self' rather than 'foreign' even in the absence of modification. We now provide evidence that restriction alleviation may be a characteristic of Type I restriction-modification systems, and that it can be achieved by different mechanisms. Our experiments support disassembly of active endonuclease complexes as a potential mechanism. We identify amino acid substitutions in a restriction endonuclease, which impair restriction alleviation in response to treatment with a mutagen, and demonstrate that restriction alleviation serves to protect the chromosome even in the absence of mutagenic treatment. In the absence of efficient restriction alleviation, a Type I restriction enzyme cleaves host DNA and, under these conditions, homologous recombination maintains the integrity of the bacterial chromosome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Svetlana Makovets
- Institute of Cell and Molecular Biology, Darwin Building, University of Edinburgh, King's Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3JR, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Affiliation(s)
- Brian M Wilkins
- Department of Genetics, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Murray NE. 2001 Fred Griffith review lecture. Immigration control of DNA in bacteria: self versus non-self. MICROBIOLOGY (READING, ENGLAND) 2002; 148:3-20. [PMID: 11782494 DOI: 10.1099/00221287-148-1-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 123] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Noreen E Murray
- Institute of Cell and Molecular Biology, Darwin Building, Mayfield Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JR, Scotland, UK1
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kobayashi I. Behavior of restriction-modification systems as selfish mobile elements and their impact on genome evolution. Nucleic Acids Res 2001; 29:3742-56. [PMID: 11557807 PMCID: PMC55917 DOI: 10.1093/nar/29.18.3742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 396] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2001] [Revised: 07/12/2001] [Accepted: 07/23/2001] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Restriction-modification (RM) systems are composed of genes that encode a restriction enzyme and a modification methylase. RM systems sometimes behave as discrete units of life, like viruses and transposons. RM complexes attack invading DNA that has not been properly modified and thus may serve as a tool of defense for bacterial cells. However, any threat to their maintenance, such as a challenge by a competing genetic element (an incompatible plasmid or an allelic homologous stretch of DNA, for example) can lead to cell death through restriction breakage in the genome. This post-segregational or post-disturbance cell killing may provide the RM complexes (and any DNA linked with them) with a competitive advantage. There is evidence that they have undergone extensive horizontal transfer between genomes, as inferred from their sequence homology, codon usage bias and GC content difference. They are often linked with mobile genetic elements such as plasmids, viruses, transposons and integrons. The comparison of closely related bacterial genomes also suggests that, at times, RM genes themselves behave as mobile elements and cause genome rearrangements. Indeed some bacterial genomes that survived post-disturbance attack by an RM gene complex in the laboratory have experienced genome rearrangements. The avoidance of some restriction sites by bacterial genomes may result from selection by past restriction attacks. Both bacteriophages and bacteria also appear to use homologous recombination to cope with the selfish behavior of RM systems. RM systems compete with each other in several ways. One is competition for recognition sequences in post-segregational killing. Another is super-infection exclusion, that is, the killing of the cell carrying an RM system when it is infected with another RM system of the same regulatory specificity but of a different sequence specificity. The capacity of RM systems to act as selfish, mobile genetic elements may underlie the structure and function of RM enzymes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Kobayashi
- Department of Molecular Biology, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Shirokanedai, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
The known nucleoside triphosphate-dependent restriction enzymes are hetero-oligomeric proteins that behave as molecular machines in response to their target sequences. They translocate DNA in a process dependent on the hydrolysis of a nucleoside triphosphate. For the ATP-dependent type I and type III restriction and modification systems, the collision of translocating complexes triggers hydrolysis of phosphodiester bonds in unmodified DNA to generate double-strand breaks. Type I endonucleases break the DNA at unspecified sequences remote from the target sequence, type III endonucleases at a fixed position close to the target sequence. Type I and type III restriction and modification (R-M) systems are notable for effective post-translational control of their endonuclease activity. For some type I enzymes, this control is mediated by proteolytic degradation of that subunit of the complex which is essential for DNA translocation and breakage. This control, lacking in the well-studied type II R-M systems, provides extraordinarily effective protection of resident DNA should it acquire unmodified target sequences. The only well-documented GTP-dependent restriction enzyme, McrBC, requires methylated target sequences for the initiation of phosphodiester bond cleavage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D T Dryden
- Department of Chemistry, University of Edinburgh, Joseph Black Building, The King's Buildings, Mayfield Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JJ, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Rocha EP, Danchin A, Viari A. Evolutionary Role of Restriction/Modification Systems as Revealed by Comparative Genome Analysis. Genome Res 2001. [DOI: 10.1101/gr.153101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Type II restriction modification systems (RMSs) have been regarded either as defense tools or as molecular parasites of bacteria. We extensively analyzed their evolutionary role from the study of their impact in the complete genomes of 26 bacteria and 35 phages in terms of palindrome avoidance. This analysis reveals that palindrome avoidance is not universally spread among bacterial species and that it does not correlate with taxonomic proximity. Palindrome avoidance is also not universal among bacteriophage, even when their hosts code for RMSs, and depends strongly on the genetic material of the phage. Interestingly, palindrome avoidance is intimately correlated with the infective behavior of the phage. We observe that the degree of palindrome and restriction site avoidance is significantly and consistently less important in phages than in their bacterial hosts. This result brings to the fore a larger selective load for palindrome and restriction site avoidance on the bacterial hosts than on their infecting phages. It is then consistent with a view where type II RMSs are considered as parasites possibly at the verge of mutualism. As a consequence, RMSs constitute a nontrivial third player in the host–parasite relationship between bacteria and phages.
Collapse
|
21
|
Murray NE. Type I restriction systems: sophisticated molecular machines (a legacy of Bertani and Weigle). Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2000; 64:412-34. [PMID: 10839821 PMCID: PMC98998 DOI: 10.1128/mmbr.64.2.412-434.2000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 332] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Restriction enzymes are well known as reagents widely used by molecular biologists for genetic manipulation and analysis, but these reagents represent only one class (type II) of a wider range of enzymes that recognize specific nucleotide sequences in DNA molecules and detect the provenance of the DNA on the basis of specific modifications to their target sequence. Type I restriction and modification (R-M) systems are complex; a single multifunctional enzyme can respond to the modification state of its target sequence with the alternative activities of modification or restriction. In the absence of DNA modification, a type I R-M enzyme behaves like a molecular motor, translocating vast stretches of DNA towards itself before eventually breaking the DNA molecule. These sophisticated enzymes are the focus of this review, which will emphasize those aspects that give insights into more general problems of molecular and microbial biology. Current molecular experiments explore target recognition, intramolecular communication, and enzyme activities, including DNA translocation. Type I R-M systems are notable for their ability to evolve new specificities, even in laboratory cultures. This observation raises the important question of how bacteria protect their chromosomes from destruction by newly acquired restriction specifities. Recent experiments demonstrate proteolytic mechanisms by which cells avoid DNA breakage by a type I R-M system whenever their chromosomal DNA acquires unmodified target sequences. Finally, the review will reflect the present impact of genomic sequences on a field that has previously derived information almost exclusively from the analysis of bacteria commonly studied in the laboratory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N E Murray
- Institute of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JR, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Handa N, Ichige A, Kusano K, Kobayashi I. Cellular responses to postsegregational killing by restriction-modification genes. J Bacteriol 2000; 182:2218-29. [PMID: 10735865 PMCID: PMC111271 DOI: 10.1128/jb.182.8.2218-2229.2000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Plasmids that carry one of several type II restriction modification gene complexes are known to show increased stability. The underlying mechanism was proposed to be the lethal attack by restriction enzyme at chromosomal recognition sites in cells that had lost the restriction modification gene complex. In order to examine bacterial responses to this postsegregational cell killing, we analyzed the cellular processes following loss of the EcoRI restriction modification gene complex carried by a temperature-sensitive plasmid in an Escherichia coli strain that is wild type with respect to DNA repair. A shift to the nonpermissive temperature blocked plasmid replication, reduced the increase in viable cell counts and resulted in loss of cell viability. Many cells formed long filaments, some of which were multinucleated and others anucleated. In a mutant defective in RecBCD exonuclease/recombinase, these cell death symptoms were more severe and cleaved chromosomes accumulated. Growth inhibition was also more severe in recA, ruvAB, ruvC, recG, and recN mutants. The cells induced the SOS response in a RecBC-dependent manner. These observations strongly suggest that bacterial cells die as a result of chromosome cleavage after loss of a restriction modification gene complex and that the bacterial RecBCD/RecA machinery helps the cells to survive, at least to some extent, by repairing the cleaved chromosomes. These and previous results have led us to hypothesize that the RecBCD/Chi/RecA system serves to destroy restricted "nonself" DNA and repair restricted "self" DNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Handa
- Department of Molecular Biology, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Shirokanedai, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lawrence J. Selfish operons: the evolutionary impact of gene clustering in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Curr Opin Genet Dev 1999; 9:642-8. [PMID: 10607610 DOI: 10.1016/s0959-437x(99)00025-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 169] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
The Selfish Operon Model postulates that the organization of bacterial genes into operons is beneficial to the constituent genes in that proximity allows horizontal cotransfer of all genes required for a selectable phenotype; eukaryotic operons formed for very different reasons. Horizontal transfer of selfish operons most probably promotes bacterial diversification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Lawrence
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, 15260, USA. jlawrenc+@pitt.edu
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Makovets S, Doronina VA, Murray NE. Regulation of endonuclease activity by proteolysis prevents breakage of unmodified bacterial chromosomes by type I restriction enzymes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999; 96:9757-62. [PMID: 10449767 PMCID: PMC22283 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.17.9757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
ClpXP-dependent proteolysis has been implicated in the delayed detection of restriction activity after the acquisition of the genes (hsdR, hsdM, and hsdS) that specify EcoKI and EcoAI, representatives of two families of type I restriction and modification (R-M) systems. Modification, once established, has been assumed to provide adequate protection against a resident restriction system. However, unmodified targets may be generated in the DNA of an hsd(+) bacterium as the result of replication errors or recombination-dependent repair. We show that ClpXP-dependent regulation of the endonuclease activity enables bacteria that acquire unmodified chromosomal target sequences to survive. In such bacteria, HsdR, the polypeptide of the R-M complex essential for restriction but not modification, is degraded in the presence of ClpXP. A mutation that blocks only the modification activity of EcoKI, leaving the cell with approximately 600 unmodified targets, is not lethal provided that ClpXP is present. Our data support a model in which the HsdR component of a type I restriction endonuclease becomes a substrate for proteolysis after the endonuclease has bound to unmodified target sequences, but before completion of the pathway that would result in DNA breakage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Makovets
- Institute of Cell and Molecular Biology, Darwin Building, King's Buildings, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JR, United Kingdom
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Bilcock DT, Halford SE. DNA restriction dependent on two recognition sites: activities of the SfiI restriction-modification system in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 1999; 31:1243-54. [PMID: 10096090 DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01266.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
In contrast to many type II restriction enzymes, dimeric proteins that cleave DNA at individual recognition sites 4-6 bp long, the SfiI endonuclease is a tetrameric protein that binds to two copies of an elongated sequence before cutting the DNA at both sites. The mode of action of the SfiI endonuclease thus seems more appropriate for DNA rearrangements than for restriction. To elucidate its biological function, strains of Escherichia coli expressing the SfiI restriction-modification system were transformed with plasmids carrying SfiI sites. The SfiI system often failed to restrict the survival of a plasmid with one SfiI site, but plasmids with two or more sites were restricted efficiently. Plasmids containing methylated SfI sites were not restricted. No rearrangements of the plasmids carrying SfiI sites were detected among the transformants. Hence, provided the target DNA contains at least two recognition sites, SfiI displays all of the hallmarks of a restriction-modification system as opposed to a recombination system in E. coli cells. The properties of the system in vivo match those of the enzyme in vitro. For both restriction in vivo and DNA cleavage in vitro, SfiI operates best with two recognition sites on the same DNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D T Bilcock
- Department of Biochemistry, School of Medical Sciences, University of Bristol, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Powell LM, Dryden DT, Murray NE. Sequence-specific DNA binding by EcoKI, a type IA DNA restriction enzyme. J Mol Biol 1998; 283:963-76. [PMID: 9799636 DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
The type I DNA restriction and modification enzymes of prokaryotes are multimeric enzymes that cleave unmethylated, foreign DNA in a complex process involving recognition of the methylation status of a DNA target sequence, extensive translocation of DNA in both directions towards the enzyme bound at the target sequence, ATP hydrolysis, which is believed to drive the translocation possibly via a helicase mechanism, and eventual endonucleolytic cleavage of the DNA. We have examined the DNA binding affinity and exonuclease III footprint of the EcoKI type IA restriction enzyme on oligonucleotide duplexes that either contain or lack the target sequence. The influence of the cofactors, S-adenosyl methionine and ATP, on binding to DNA of different methylation states has been assessed. EcoKI in the absence of ATP, with or without S-adenosyl methionine, binds tightly even to DNA lacking the target site and the exonuclease footprint is large, approximately 45 base-pairs. The protection is weaker on DNA lacking the target site. Partially assembled EcoKI lacking one or both of the subunits essential for DNA cleavage, is unable to bind tightly to DNA lacking the target site but can bind tightly to the recognition site. The addition of ATP to EcoKI, in the presence of AdoMet, allows tight binding only to the target site and the footprint shrinks to 30 base-pairs, almost identical to that of the modification enzyme which makes up the core of EcoKI. The same effect occurs when S-adenosyl homocysteine or sinefungin are substituted for S-adenosyl methionine, and ADP or ATPgammaS are substituted for ATP. It is proposed that the DNA binding surface of EcoKI comprises three regions: a "core" region which recognises the target sequence and which is present on the modification enzyme, and a region on each DNA cleavage subunit. The cleavage subunits make tight contacts to any DNA molecule in the absence of cofactors, but this contact is weakened in the presence of cofactors to allow the protein conformational changes required for DNA translocation when a target site is recognised by the core modification enzyme. This weakening of the interaction between the DNA cleavage subunits and the DNA could allow more access of exonuclease III to the DNA and account for the shorter footprint.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L M Powell
- Institute of Cell & Molecular Biology, University of Edinburgh, The King's Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JR, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Dybvig K, Sitaraman R, French CT. A family of phase-variable restriction enzymes with differing specificities generated by high-frequency gene rearrangements. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998; 95:13923-8. [PMID: 9811902 PMCID: PMC24968 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.23.13923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 105] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/1998] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The hsd genes of Mycoplasma pulmonis encode restriction and modification enzymes exhibiting a high degree of sequence similarity to the type I enzymes of enteric bacteria. The S subunits of type I systems dictate the DNA sequence specificity of the holoenzyme and are required for both the restriction and the modification reactions. The M. pulmonis chromosome has two hsd loci, both of which contain two hsdS genes each and are complex, site-specific DNA inversion systems. Embedded within the coding region of each hsdS gene are a minimum of three sites at which DNA inversions occur to generate extensive amino acid sequence variations in the predicted S subunits. We show that the polymorphic hsdS genes produced by gene rearrangement encode a family of functional S subunits with differing DNA sequence specificities. In addition to creating polymorphisms in hsdS sequences, DNA inversions regulate the phase-variable production of restriction activity because the other genes required for restriction activity (hsdR and hsdM) are expressed only from loci that are oriented appropriately in the chromosome relative to the hsd promoter. These data cast doubt on the prevailing paradigms that restriction systems are either selfish or function to confer protection from invasion by foreign DNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Dybvig
- Department of Comparative Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294-0019, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Akopyants NS, Fradkov A, Diatchenko L, Hill JE, Siebert PD, Lukyanov SA, Sverdlov ED, Berg DE. PCR-based subtractive hybridization and differences in gene content among strains of Helicobacter pylori. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998; 95:13108-13. [PMID: 9789049 PMCID: PMC23726 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.22.13108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 179] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Genes that are characteristic of only certain strains of a bacterial species can be of great biologic interest. Here we describe a PCR-based subtractive hybridization method for efficiently detecting such DNAs and apply it to the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori. Eighteen DNAs specific to a monkey-colonizing strain (J166) were obtained by subtractive hybridization against an unrelated strain whose genome has been fully sequenced (26695). Seven J166-specific clones had no DNA sequence match to the 26695 genome, and 11 other clones were mixed, with adjacent patches that did and did not match any sequences in 26695. At the protein level, seven clones had homology to putative DNA restriction-modification enzymes, and two had homology to putative metabolic enzymes. Nine others had no database match with proteins of assigned function. PCR tests of 13 unrelated H. pylori strains by using primers specific for 12 subtracted clones and complementary Southern blot hybridizations indicated that these DNAs are highly polymorphic in the H. pylori population, with each strain yielding a different pattern of gene-specific PCR amplification. The search for polymorphic DNAs, as described here, should help identify previously unknown virulence genes in pathogens and provide new insights into microbial genetic diversity and evolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N S Akopyants
- Departments of Molecular Microbiology and Genetics, Washington University Medical School, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Makovets S, Titheradge AJ, Murray NE. ClpX and ClpP are essential for the efficient acquisition of genes specifying type IA and IB restriction systems. Mol Microbiol 1998; 28:25-35. [PMID: 9593294 DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00767.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Efficient acquisition of genes that encode a restriction and modification (R-M) system with specificities different from any already present in the recipient bacterium requires the sequential production of the new modification enzyme followed by the restriction activity in order that the chromosome of the recipient bacterium is protected against attack by the restriction endonuclease. We show that ClpX and ClpP, the components of ClpXP protease, are necessary for the efficient transmission of the genes encoding EcoKI and EcoAI, representatives of two families of type I R-M systems, thus implicating ClpXP in the modulation of restriction activity. Loss of ClpX imposed a bigger barrier than loss of ClpP, consistent with a dual role for ClpX, possibly as a chaperone and as a component of the ClpXP protease. Transmission of genes specifying EcoKI was more dependent on ClpX and ClpP than transmission of the genes for EcoAI. Sensitivity to absence of the protease was also influenced by the mode of gene transfer; conjugative transfer and transformation were more dependent on ClpXP than transduction. In the absence of either ClpX or ClpP transfer of the EcoKI genes by P1-mediated transduction was impaired, transfer of the EcoAI genes was not.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Makovets
- Institute of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|