Localization of F plasmid SopB protein to positions near the poles of Escherichia coli cells

Identification of a Potential Membrane-Targeting Sequence in the C-Terminus of the F Plasmid Segregation Protein SopA

Stable maintenance and partitioning of the 'Fertility' plasmid or the F plasmid in its host Escherichia coli require the function of a ParA superfamily of proteins known as SopA. The mechanism by which SopA mediates plasmid segregation is well studied. SopA is a nucleoid-binding protein and binds DNA in an ATP-dependent but sequence non-specific manner. ATP hydrolysis stimulated by the binding of the SopBC complex mediates the release of SopA from the nucleoid. Cycles of ATP-binding and hydrolysis generate an ATPase gradient that moves the plasmid through a chemophoresis force. Nucleoid binding of SopA thus assumes a central role in its plasmid-partitioning function. However, earlier work also suggests that the F plasmid can be partitioned into anucleate cells, thus implicating nucleoid independent partitioning. Interestingly, SopA is also reported to be associated with the inner membrane of the bacteria. Here, we report the identification of a possible membrane-targeting sequence, a predicted amphipathic helix, at the C-terminus of SopA. Molecular dynamics simulations indicate that the predicted amphipathic helical motif of SopA has weak affinity for membranes. Moreover, we experimentally show that SopA can associate with bacterial membranes, is detectable in the membrane fractions of bacterial lysates, and is sensitive to the membrane potential. Further, unlike the wild-type SopA, a deletion of the C-terminal 29 amino acids results in the loss of F plasmids from bacterial cells.

Oscillating focus of SopA associated with filamentous structure guides partitioning of F plasmid

The F plasmid is actively partitioned to daughter cells by the sopABC gene. To elucidate the partitioning mechanisms, we simultaneously analysed movements of the plasmid and the SopA ATPase in single living cells. SopA, which is a putative motor protein assembled densely near nucleoid borders and formed a single discrete focus associated with less dense filamentous distribution along the long axis of the cell. The dense SopA focus oscillates between cell poles. The direction of the plasmid motion switches as the SopA focus switches its position. The velocity of the plasmid motion stays constant while it oscillates moving towards the SopA focus. The low density filamentous distribution of SopA persisted throughout the SopA oscillation. The focus associated with filamentous distribution of SopA was also observed in a cell without nucleoid. The SopA filament may guide the movement of the plasmid as a railway track and lead it to cell quarters.

The chromosome partitioning proteins Soj (ParA) and Spo0J (ParB) contribute to accurate chromosome partitioning, separation of replicated sister origins, and regulation of replication initiation in Bacillus subtilis

Soj (ParA) and Spo0J (ParB) of Bacillus subtilis belong to a conserved family of proteins required for efficient plasmid and chromosome partitioning in many bacterial species. Unlike most Par systems, for which intact copies of both parA and parB are required for the Par system to function, inactivating soj does not cause a detectable chromosome partitioning phenotype whereas inactivating spo0J leads to a 100-fold increase in the production of anucleate cells. This suggested either that Soj does not function like other ParA homologues, or that a cellular factor might compensate for the absence of soj. We found that inactivating smc, the gene encoding the structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) protein, unmasked a role for Soj in chromosome partitioning. A soj null mutation dramatically enhanced production of anucleate cells in an smc null mutant. To look for effects of a soj null on other phenotypes perturbed in a spo0J null mutant, we analysed replication initiation and origin positioning in (soj-spo0J)+, Deltasoj, Deltaspo0J and Delta(soj-spo0J) cells. All of the mutations caused increased initiation of replication and, to varying extents, affected origin positioning. Using a new assay to measure separation of the chromosomal origins, we found that inactivating soj, spo0J or both led to a significant defect in separating replicated sister origins, such that the origins remain too close to be spatially resolved. Separation of a region outside the origin was not affected. These results indicate that there are probably factors helping to pair sister origin regions for part of the replication cycle, and that Soj and Spo0J may antagonize this pairing to contribute to timely separation of replicated origins. The effects of Deltasoj, Deltaspo0J and Delta(soj-spo0J) mutations on origin positioning, chromosome partitioning and replication initiation may be a secondary consequence of a defect in separating replicated origins.

Subcellular Positioning of F Plasmid Mediated by Dynamic Localization of SopA and SopB

SopA, SopB proteins and the cis-acting sopC DNA region of F plasmid are essential for partitioning of the plasmid, ensuring proper subcellular positioning of the plasmid DNA molecules. We have analyzed by immunofluorescence microscopy the subcellular localization of SopA and SopB. The majority of SopB molecules formed foci, which localized frequently with F plasmid DNA molecules. The foci increased in number in proportion to the cell length. Interestingly, beside the foci formation, SopB formed a spiral structure that was dependent on SopA, which also formed a spiral structure, independent of the presence of SopB, and these two structures partially overlapped. On the basis of these results and previous biochemical studies together with our simulations, we propose a theoretical model named "the reaction-diffusion partitioning model", using reaction-diffusion equations that explain the dynamic subcellular localization of SopA and SopB proteins and the subcellular positioning of F plasmid. We hypothesized that sister copies of plasmid DNA compete with each other for sites at which SopB multimer is at the optimum concentration. The plasmid incompatibility mediated by the Sop system might be explained clearly by this hypothesis.

Plasmid segregation mechanisms

Bacterial plasmids encode partitioning (par) loci that ensure ordered plasmid segregation prior to cell division. par loci come in two types: those that encode actin-like ATPases and those that encode deviant Walker-type ATPases. ParM, the actin-like ATPase of plasmid R1, forms dynamic filaments that segregate plasmids paired at mid-cell to daughter cells. Like microtubules, ParM filaments exhibit dynamic instability (i.e., catastrophic decay) whose regulation is an important component of the DNA segregation process. The Walker box ParA ATPases are related to MinD and form highly dynamic, oscillating filaments that are required for the subcellular movement and positioning of plasmids. The role of the observed ATPase oscillation is not yet understood. However, we propose a simple model that couples plasmid segregation to ParA oscillation. The model is consistent with the observed movement and localization patterns of plasmid foci and does not require the involvement of plasmid-specific host-encoded factors.

Bacterial DNA segregation by dynamic SopA polymers

Many bacterial plasmids and chromosomes rely on ParA ATPases for proper positioning within the cell and for efficient segregation to daughter cells. Here we demonstrate that the F-plasmid-partitioning protein SopA polymerizes into filaments in an ATP-dependent manner in vitro, and that the filaments elongate at a rate that is similar to that of plasmid separation in vivo. We show that SopA is a dynamic protein within the cell, undergoing cycles of polymerization and depolymerization, and shuttling back and forth between nucleoprotein complexes that are composed of the SopB protein bound to sopC-containing plasmids (SopB/sopC). The dynamic behavior of SopA is critical for Sop-mediated plasmid DNA segregation; mutations that lock SopA into a static polymer in the cell inhibit plasmid segregation. We show that SopA colocalizes with SopB/sopC in the cell and that SopB/sopC nucleates the assembly of SopA and is required for its dynamic behavior. When SopA is polymerized in vitro in the presence of SopB and sopC-containing DNA, SopA filaments emanate from the plasmid DNA in radial asters. We propose a mechanism in which plasmid separation is driven by the polymerization of SopA, and we speculate that the radial assembly of SopA polymers is responsible for positioning plasmids both before and after segregation.

Multicopy plasmids affect replisome positioning in Bacillus subtilis

The DNA replication machinery, various regions of the chromosome, and some plasmids occupy characteristic subcellular positions in bacterial cells. We visualized the location of a multicopy plasmid, pHP13, in living cells of Bacillus subtilis using an array of lac operators and LacI-green fluorescent protein (GFP). In the majority of cells, plasmids appeared to be highly mobile and randomly distributed. In a small fraction of cells, there appeared to be clusters of plasmids located predominantly at or near a cell pole. We also monitored the effects of the presence of multicopy plasmids on the position of DNA polymerase using a fusion of a subunit of DNA polymerase to GFP. Many of the plasmid-containing cells had extra foci of the replisome, and these were often found at uncharacteristic locations in the cell. Some of the replisome foci were dynamic and highly mobile, similar to what was observed for the plasmid. In contrast, replisome foci in plasmid-free cells were relatively stationary. Our results indicate that in B. subtilis, plasmid-associated replisomes are recruited to the subcellular position of the plasmid. Extending this notion to the chromosome, we postulated that the subcellular position of the chromosomally associated replisome is established by the subcellular location of oriC at the time of initiation of replication.

Structure and segregation of the bacterial nucleoid

In bacteria, chromosome segregation and DNA replication occur concurrently and there is no clear equivalent of a eukaryote mitotic spindle. Chromosome segregation can be viewed as a two-step process. As the first step, the origin of replication regions are segregated actively, probably by a mechanism involving an as yet unidentified motor protein or proteins, and held in position. The second step is the separation and migration of the rest of the chromosome probably driven by forces generated from various cellular processes such as DNA replication, transcription and transertion.

Rv1818c-encoded PE_PGRS protein of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is surface exposed and influences bacterial cell structure

Identification of the novel PE multigene family was an unexpected finding of the genomic sequencing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Presently, the biological role of the PE and PE_PGRS proteins encoded by this unique family of mycobacterial genes remains unknown. In this report, a representative PE_PGRS gene (Rv1818c/PE_PGRS33) was selected to investigate the role of these proteins. Cell fractionation studies and fluorescence analysis of recombinant strains of Mycobacterium smegmatis and M. tuberculosis expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged proteins indicated that the Rv1818c gene product localized in the mycobacterial cell wall, mostly at the bacterial cell poles, where it is exposed to the extracellular milieu. Further analysis of this PE_PGRS protein showed that the PE domain is necessary for subcellular localization. In addition, the PGRS domain, but not PE, affects bacterial shape and colony morphology when Rv1818c is overexpressed in M. smegmatis and M. tuberculosis. Taken together, the results indicate that PE_PGRS and PE proteins can be associated with the mycobacterial cell wall and influence cellular structure as well as the formation of mycobacterial colonies. Regulated expression of PE genes could have implications for the survival and pathogenesis of mycobacteria within the human host and in other environmental niches.

Bacterial Mitotic Machineries

Here, we review recent progress that yields fundamental new insight into the molecular mechanisms behind plasmid and chromosome segregation in prokaryotic cells. In particular, we describe how prokaryotic actin homologs form mitotic machineries that segregate DNA before cell division. Thus, the ParM protein of plasmid R1 forms F actin-like filaments that separate and move plasmid DNA from mid-cell to the cell poles. Evidence from three different laboratories indicate that the morphogenetic MreB protein may be involved in segregation of the bacterial chromosome.

Effects of the chromosome partitioning protein Spo0J (ParB) on oriC positioning and replication initiation in Bacillus subtilis

Spo0J (ParB) of Bacillus subtilis is a DNA-binding protein that belongs to a conserved family of proteins required for efficient plasmid and chromosome partitioning in many bacterial species. We found that Spo0J contributes to the positioning of the chromosomal oriC region, but probably not by recruiting the origin regions to specific subcellular locations. In wild-type cells during exponential growth, duplicated origin regions were generally positioned around the cell quarters. In a spo0J null mutant, sister origin regions were often closer together, nearer to midcell. We found, by using a Spo0J-green fluorescent protein [GFP] fusion, that the subcellular location of Spo0J was a consequence of the chromosomal positions of the Spo0J binding sites. When an array of binding sites (parS sites) were inserted at various chromosomal locations in the absence of six of the eight known parS sites, Spo0J-GFP was no longer found predominantly at the cell quarters, indicating that Spo0J is not sufficient to recruit chromosomal parS sites to the cell quarters. spo0J also affected chromosome positioning during sporulation. A spo0J null mutant showed an increase in the number of cells with some origin-distal regions located in the forespore. In addition, a spo0J null mutation caused an increase in the number of foci per cell of LacI-GFP bound to arrays of lac operators inserted in various positions in the chromosome, including the origin region, an increase in the DNA-protein ratio, and an increase in origins per cell, as determined by flow cytometry. These results indicate that the spo0J mutant produced a significant proportion of cells with increased chromosome content, probably due to increased and asynchronous initiation of DNA replication.

Bacterial chromosome segregation

Recent studies have made great strides toward our understanding of the mechanisms of microbial chromosome segregation and partitioning. This review first describes the mechanisms that function to segregate newly replicated chromosomes, generating daughter molecules that are viable substrates for partitioning. Then experiments that address the mechanisms of bulk chromosome movement are summarized. Recent evidence indicates that a stationary DNA replication factory may be responsible for supplying the force necessary to move newly duplicated DNA toward the cell poles. Some factors contributing to the directionality of chromosome movement probably include centromere-like-binding proteins, DNA condensation proteins, and DNA translocation proteins.

Effects of the P1 plasmid centromere on expression of P1 partition genes

The partition operon of P1 plasmid encodes two proteins, ParA and ParB, required for the faithful segregation of plasmid copies to daughter cells. The operon is followed by a centromere analog, parS, at which ParB binds. ParA, a weak ATPase, represses the par promoter most effectively in its ADP-bound form. ParB can recruit ParA to parS, stimulate its ATPase, and significantly stimulate the repression. We report here that parS also participates in the regulation of expression of the par genes. A single chromosomal parS was shown to augment repression of several copies of the par promoter by severalfold. The repression increase was sensitive to the levels of ParA and ParB and to their ratio. The increase may be attributable to a conformational change in ParA mediated by the parS-ParB complex, possibly acting catalytically. We also observed an in cis effect of parS which enhanced expression of parB, presumably due to a selective modulation of the mRNA level. Although ParB had been earlier found to spread into and silence genes flanking parS, silencing of the par operon by ParB spreading was not significant. Based upon analogies between partitioning and septum placement, we speculate that the regulatory switch controlled by the parS-ParB complex might be essential for partitioning itself.

Pairing of P1 plasmid partition sites by ParB

The mechanisms by which bacterial plasmids and chromosomes are partitioned are largely obscure, but it has long been assumed that the molecules to be separated are initially paired, as are sister chromatids in mitosis. We offer in vivo evidence that the partition protein ParB encoded by the bacterial plasmid P1 can pair cis-acting partition sites of P1 inserted in a small, multicopy plasmid. ParB was shown previously to be capable of extensive spreading along DNA flanking the partition sites. Experiments in which ParB spreading was constrained by physical roadblocks suggest that extensive spreading is not required for the pairing process.

Green fluorescent protein--a bright idea for the study of bacterial protein localization

Use of the green fluorescent protein (GFP) of Aequorea victoria as a reporter for protein and DNA localization has provided sensitive, new approaches for studying the organization of the bacterial cell, leading to new insights into diverse cellular processes. GFP has many characteristics that make it useful for localization studies in bacteria, primarily its ability to fluoresce when fused to target polypeptides without the addition of exogenously added substrates. As an alternative to immunofluorescence microscopy, the expression of gfp gene fusions has been used to probe the function of cellular components fundamental for DNA replication, translation, protein export, and signal transduction, that heretofore have been difficult to study in living cells. Moreover, protein and DNA localization can now be monitored in real time, revealing that several proteins important for cell division, development and sporulation are dynamically localized throughout the cell cycle. The use of additional GFP variants that permit the labeling of multiple components within the same cell, and the use of GFP for genetic screens, should continue to make this a valuable tool for addressing complex questions about the bacterial cell.

The bacterial ParA-ParB partitioning proteins

A pair of genes designated parA and parB are encoded by many low copy number plasmids and bacterial chromosomes. They work with one or more cis-acting sites termed centromere-like sequences to ensure better than random predivisional partitioning of the DNA molecule that encodes them. The centromere-like sequences nucleate binding of ParB and titrate sufficient protein to create foci, which are easily visible by immuno-fluorescence microscopy. These foci normally follow the plasmid or the chromosomal replication oriC complexes. ParA is a membrane-associated ATPase that is essential for this symmetric movement of the ParB foci. In Bacillus subtilis ParA oscillates from end to end of the cell as does MinD of E. coli, a relative of the ParA family. ParA may facilitate ParB movement along the inner surface of the cytoplasmic membrane to encounter and become tethered to the next replication zone. The ATP-bound form of ParA appears to adopt the conformation needed to drive partition. Hydrolysis to create ParA-ADP or free ParA appears to favour a form that is not located at the pole and binds to DNA rather than the partition complex. Definition of the protein domains needed for interaction with membranes and the conformational changes that occur on interaction with ATP/ADP will provide insights into the partitioning mechanism and possible targets for inhibitors of partitioning.

Dynamic localization of bacterial and plasmid chromosomes

Plasmid-encoded partition genes determine the dynamic localization of plasmid molecules from the mid-cell position to the 1/4 and 3/4 positions. Similarly, bacterial homologs of the plasmid genes participate in controlling the bidirectional migration of the replication origin (oriC) regions during sporulation and vegetative growth in Bacillus subtilis, but not in Escherichia coli. In E. coli, but not B. subtilis, the chromosomal DNA is fully methylated by DNA adenine methyltransferase. The E. coli SeqA protein, which binds preferentially to hemimethylated nascent DNA strands, exists as discrete foci in vivo. A single SeqA focus, which is a SeqA-hemimethylated DNA cluster, splits into two foci that then abruptly migrate bidirectionally to the 1/4 and 3/4 positions during replication. Replicated oriC copies are linked to each other for a substantial period of generation time, before separating from each other and migrating in opposite directions. The MukFEB complex of E. coli and Smc of B. subtilis appear to participate in the reorganization of bacterial sister chromosomes.

DNA segregation in bacteria

Segregation of DNA in bacterial cells is an efficient process that assures that every daughter cell receives a copy of genomic and plasmid DNA. In this review, we focus primarily on observations in recent years, including the visualization of DNA and proteins at the subcellular level, that have begun to define the events that separate DNA molecules. Unlike the process of chromosome segregation in higher cells, segregation of the bacterial chromosome is a continuous process in which chromosomes are separated as they are replicated. Essential to separation is the initial movement of sister origins to opposite ends of the cell. Subsequent replication and controlled condensation of DNA are the driving forces that move sister chromosomes toward their respective origins, which establishes the polarity required for segregation. Final steps in the resolution and separation of sister chromosomes occur at the replication terminus, which is localized at the cell center. In contrast to the chromosome, segregation of low-copy plasmids, such as Escherichia coli F, P1, and R1, is by mechanisms that resemble those used in eukaryotic cells. Each plasmid has a centromere-like site to which plasmid-specified partition proteins bind to promote segregation. Replication of plasmid DNA, which occurs at the cell center, is followed by rapid partition protein-mediated separation of sister plasmids, which become localized at distinct sites on either side of the division plane. The fundamental similarity between chromosome and plasmid segregation-placement of DNA to specific cell sites-implies an underlying cellular architecture to which both DNA and proteins refer.

Plasmid and chromosome partitioning: surprises from phylogeny

Plasmids encode partitioning genes (par) that are required for faithful plasmid segregation at cell division. Initially, par loci were identified on plasmids, but more recently they were also found on bacterial chromosomes. We present here a phylogenetic analysis of par loci from plasmids and chromosomes from prokaryotic organisms. All known plasmid-encoded par loci specify three components: a cis-acting centromere-like site and two trans-acting proteins that form a nucleoprotein complex at the centromere (i.e. the partition complex). The proteins are encoded by two genes in an operon that is autoregulated by the par-encoded proteins. In all cases, the upstream gene encodes an ATPase that is essential for partitioning. Recent cytological analyses indicate that the ATPases function as adaptors between a host-encoded component and the partition complex and thereby tether plasmids and chromosomal origin regions to specific subcellular sites (i.e. the poles or quarter-cell positions). Two types of partitioning ATPases are known: the Walker-type ATPases encoded by the par/sop gene family (type I partitioning loci) and the actin-like ATPase encoded by the par locus of plasmid R1 (type II partitioning locus). A phylogenetic analysis of the large family of Walker type of partitioning ATPases yielded a surprising pattern: most of the plasmid-encoded ATPases clustered into distinct subgroups. Surprisingly, however, the par loci encoding these distinct subgroups have different genetic organizations and thus divide the type I loci into types Ia and Ib. A second surprise was that almost all chromosome-encoded ATPases, including members from both Gram-negative and Gram-positive Bacteria and Archaea, clustered into one distinct subgroup. The phylogenetic tree is consistent with lateral gene transfer between Bacteria and Archaea. Using database mining with the ParM ATPase of plasmid R1, we identified a new par gene family from enteric bacteria. These type II loci, which encode ATPases of the actin type, have a genetic organization similar to that of type Ib loci.

Plasmid and chromosome segregation in prokaryotes

Recent major advances in the understanding of prokaryotic DNA segregation have been achieved by using fluorescence microscopy to visualize the localization of cellular components. Plasmids and bacterial chromosomes are partitioned in a highly dynamic fashion, suggesting the presence of a mitotic-like apparatus in prokaryotes. The identification of chromosomal homologues of the well-characterized plasmid partitioning genes indicates that there could be a general mechanism of bacterial DNA partitioning.

Green fluorescent protein functions as a reporter for protein localization in Escherichia coli

The use of green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a reporter for protein localization in Escherichia coli was explored by creating gene fusions between malE (encoding maltose-binding protein [MBP]) and a variant of gfp optimized for fluorescence in bacteria (GFPuv). These constructs encode hybrid proteins composed of GFP fused to the carboxy-terminal end of MBP. Fluorescence was not detected when the hybrid protein was synthesized with the MBP signal sequence. In contrast, when the MBP signal sequence was deleted, fluorescence was observed. Cell fractionation studies showed that the fluorescent MBP-GFP hybrid protein was localized in the cytoplasm, whereas the nonfluorescent version was localized to the periplasmic space. Smaller MBP-GFP hybrid proteins, however, exhibited abnormal fractionation. Expression of the gene fusions in different sec mutants, as well as signal sequence processing assays, confirmed that the periplasmically localized hybrid proteins were exported by the sec-dependent pathway. The distinction between fluorescent and nonfluorescent colonies was exploited as a scorable phenotype to isolate malE signal sequence mutations. While expression of hybrid proteins comprised of full-length MBP did not result in overproduction lethality characteristic of some exported beta-galactosidase hybrid proteins, synthesis of shorter, exported hybrid proteins was toxic to the cells. Purification of MBP-GFP hybrid protein from the different cellular compartments indicated that GFP is improperly folded when localized outside of the cytoplasm. These results suggest that GFP could serve as a useful reporter for genetic analysis of bacterial protein export and of protein folding.

Transcriptional silencing in bacteria

Transcriptional silencing and repression are modes of negative control of gene expression that differ in specificity. Repressors, when present at promoter-specific binding sites, interfere locally with RNA polymerase function. Silencing proteins act by covering a continuous region of DNA, compete with a broader spectrum of proteins and are non-specific with respect to the promoters affected. Studies of transcriptional silencing promise an entrée to relatively unexplored areas of prokaryotic biology.

Green fluorescent protein as a reporter for macromolecular localization in bacterial cells

Green fluorescent protein (GFP) is a highly useful fluorescent tag for studying the localization, structure, and dynamics of macromolecules in living cells, and has quickly become a primary tool for analysis of DNA and protein localization in prokaryotes. Several properties of GFP make it an attractive and versatile reporter. It is fluorescent and soluble in a wide variety of species, can be monitored noninvasively by external illumination, and needs no external substrates. Localization of GFP fusion proteins can be analyzed in live bacteria, therefore eliminating potential fixation artifacts and enabling real-time monitoring of dynamics in situ. Such real-time studies have been facilitated by brighter, more soluble GFP variants. In addition, red-shifted GFPs that can be excited by blue light have lessened the problem of UV-induced toxicity and photobleaching. The self-contained domain structure of GFP reduces the chance of major perturbations to GFP fluorescence by fused proteins and, conversely, to the activities of the proteins to which it is fused. As a result, many proteins fused to GFP retain their activities. The stability of GFP also allows detection of its fluorescence in vitro during protein purification and in cells fixed for indirect immunofluorescence and other staining protocols. Finally, the different properties of GFP variants have given rise to several technological innovations in the study of cellular physiology that should prove useful for studies in live bacteria. These include fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) for studying protein-protein interactions and specially engineered GFP constructs for direct determination of cellular ion fluxes.

Intracellular localization of P1 ParB protein depends on ParA and parS

The P1 partition system promotes faithful plasmid segregation during the Escherichia coli cell cycle. This system consists of two proteins, ParA and ParB, that act on a plasmid site called parS. By immunofluorescence microscopy, we observed that ParB localizes to discrete foci that are most often located close to the one-quarter and three-quarters positions of cell length. The visualization of ParB foci depended completely on the presence of parS, although their visualization was independent of the chromosomal context of parS (in P1 or the bacterial chromosome). In integration host factor-defective mutants, in which ParB binding to parS is weakened, only a fraction of the total pool of ParB had converged into foci. Taken together, these results indicate that parS recruits a pool of ParB into foci and that the resulting ParB-parS complexes serve as substrates for the segregation reaction. In the absence of ParA, the position of ParB foci in cells is perturbed, indicating that at least one of the roles of ParA is to direct ParB-parS complexes to the proper one-quarter positions from a cell pole. Finally, inhibition of cell division did not inhibit localization of ParB foci in cells, indicating that the positioning signals in the E. coli host that are needed for P1 partition do not depend on early division events.

Dynamic movement of the ParA-like Soj protein of B. subtilis and its dual role in nucleoid organization and developmental regulation

The Spo0J and Soj proteins of B. subtilis belong to a widespread family of bacterial proteins required for accurate segregation of plasmids and chromosomes. Spo0J binds to several sites around the oriC region of the chromosome, which are organized into compact foci that may play a centromere-like role in active chromosome segregation. We now show that Soj has a role in organization or compaction of Spo0J-oriC complexes and possibly other regions of the nucleoid. This activity is accompanied by a dynamic localization pattern in which Soj protein undergoes assembly and disassembly into large nucleoid-associated patches on a timescale of minutes. The dynamic behavior of Soj, like its previously described transcriptional repression activity, is controlled by Spo0J. These interactions may constitute a checkpoint coupling developmental transcription to cell cycle progression.

Effect of growth rate and incC mutation on symmetric plasmid distribution by the IncP-1 partitioning apparatus

The incC and korB genes of IncP-1 plasmid RK2 encode homologues of ubiquitous ParA and ParB partitioning proteins of bacterial plasmids and chromosomes. Using immunofluorescence microscopy, we found that KorB, which binds to 12 widely distributed sites on the genome, is located in symmetrically placed foci in cells containing IncP-1 plasmids. When maintained by the low-copy-number P7 replicon, an RK2 segment including incC, korB and the kla, kle and korC regions encodes an efficient partitioning system that gives a pattern of foci similar to RK2 itself. Symmetrical distribution of KorB foci correlates with segregational stability conferred by either the IncP-1 or P7 partitioning systems; KorB distribution follows plasmid distribution. In the absence of a second partitioning system, incC inactivation resulted in paired or clumped foci that were not symmetrically distributed. At a slow growth rate, position analysis of foci showed a cycle from one central focus to two foci (at one- and three-quarter positions) and back, and at a high growth rate it showed a cycle from two foci to four and back. This pattern fits with the plasmid being coupled to the replication zones in the cell and being moved to successively younger zones by active partitioning, indicating a tight association between replication and partitioning.

Interaction between F plasmid partition proteins SopA and SopB

Two different yeast two hybrid systems were used to examine interaction between the partition proteins SopA and SopB of F plasmid as well as their self association. In one system, the yeast Gal4 protein DNA binding domain (Gal4-BD) is fused to the N-terminus of the bait protein, and the Gal4 activation domain (Gal4-AD) is fused to the N-terminus of the target protein (1). In the other system, the target hybrid remains unchanged but E. coli LexA protein (LexA) is fused to the C-terminus of the bait protein (2). It is found that C-terminus part of SopB is involved in interaction with itself, as an N-terminal truncation of SopB, SopB-(120-323) remains capable of self association. For interaction between SopA, deletion of the N-terminal part weakens but does not abolish the interaction. Interaction between SopB and SopA protein was also detected, but only by the use of the second system. Full length SopB [SopB-(1-323)] or SopB-(1-180) lacking the C-terminal region beyond amino acid 180 can interact with full-length SopA-(1-383) protein.

Gene silencing via protein-mediated subcellular localization of DNA

We previously reported that overexpression of SopB, an Escherichia coli F plasmid-encoded partition protein, led to silencing of genes linked to, but well-separated from, a cluster of SopB-binding sites termed sopC. We show here that in this SopB-mediated repression of sopC-linked genes, all but the N-terminal 82 amino acids of SopB can be replaced by the DNA-binding domain of a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein, provided that the sopC locus is also replaced by the recognition sequence of the DNA-binding domain. These results, together with our previous finding that the N-terminal fragment of SopB is responsible for its polar localization in cells, suggest a mechanism of gene silencing: patches of closely packed DNA-binding domains are formed if a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein is localized to specific cellular sites; such a patch can capture a DNA carrying the recognition site of the DNA-binding domain and sequestrate genes adjacent to the recognition site through nonspecific binding of DNA. The generalization of this model to gene silencing in eukaryotes is discussed.

Protein localization during the Caulobacter crescentus cell cycle

New research on bacterial cells has demonstrated that they have a dynamic and complex subcellular organization. Work in Caulobacter crescentus shows that essential and nonessential proteins localize to discrete positions in the cell as a function of cell-cycle progression. The flagellum and chemotaxis receptor are asymmetrically localized to a single pole in the predivisional cell by coordinated proteolysis and transcriptional regulation. Cell type- and compartment-specific localization of the CtrA global transcriptional regulator is essential for proper cell-cycle progression, and subcellular localization of key chromosome partitioning proteins is correlated with proper nucleoid segregation. Given this structural complexity, we are driven to ask how localization is achieved, and to what end.

Structural organization of virulence-associated plasmids of Yersinia pestis

The complete nucleotide sequence and gene organization of the three virulence plasmids from Yersinia pestis KIM5 were determined. Plasmid pPCP1 (9,610 bp) has a GC content of 45.3% and encodes two previously known virulence factors, an associated protein, and a single copy of IS100. Plasmid pCD1 (70,504 bp) has a GC content of 44.8%. It is known to encode a number of essential virulence determinants, regulatory functions, and a multiprotein secretory system comprising the low-calcium response stimulation that is shared with the other two Yersinia species pathogenic for humans (Y. pseudotuberculosis and Y. enterocolitica). A new pseudogene, which occurs as an intact gene in the Y. enterocolitica and Y. pseudotuberculosis-derived analogues, was found in pCD1. It corresponds to that encoding the lipoprotein YlpA. Several intact and partial insertion sequences and/or transposons were also found in pCD1, as well as six putative structural genes with high homology to proteins of unknown function in other yersiniae. The sequences of the genes involved in the replication of pCD1 are highly homologous to those of the cognate plasmids in Y. pseudotuberculosis and Y. enterocolitica, but their localization within the plasmid differs markedly from those of the latter. Plasmid pMT1 (100,984 bp) has a GC content of 50.2%. It possesses two copies of IS100, which are located 25 kb apart and in opposite orientations. Adjacent to one of these IS100 inserts is a partial copy of IS285. A single copy of an IS200-like element (recently named IS1541) was also located in pMT1. In addition to 5 previously described genes, such as murine toxin, capsule antigen, capsule anchoring protein, etc., 30 homologues to genes of several bacterial species were found in this plasmid, and another 44 open reading frames without homology to any known or hypothetical protein in the databases were predicted.

Mechanism of DNA segregation in prokaryotes: replicon pairing by parC of plasmid R1

Prokaryotic chromosomes and plasmids encode partitioning systems that are required for DNA segregation at cell division. The systems are thought to be functionally analogous to eukaryotic centromeres and to play a general role in DNA segregation. The parA system of plasmid R1 encodes two proteins ParM and ParR, and a cis-acting centromere-like site denoted parC. The ParR protein binds to parC in vivo and in vitro. The ParM protein is an ATPase that interacts with ParR specifically bound to parC. Using electron microscopy, we show here that parC mediates efficient pairing of plasmid molecules. The pairing requires binding of ParR to parC and is stimulated by the ParM ATPase. The ParM mediated stimulation of plasmid pairing is dependent on ATP hydrolysis by ParM. Using a ligation kinetics assay, we find that ParR stimulates ligation of parC-containing DNA fragments. The rate-of-ligation was increased by wild type ParM protein but not by mutant ParM protein deficient in the ATPase activity. Thus, two independent assays show that parC mediates pairing of plasmid molecules in vitro. These results are consistent with the proposal that replicon pairing is part of the mechanism of DNA segregation in prokaryotes.